enabling observations of temperature and humidity profiles

21
Reising et al., A2P3 ESTF 2017, Caltech, Pasadena, CA June 13, 2017 1 Enabling Observations of Temperature and Humidity Profiles and Cloud Ice Particle Size Distribution in the Upper- Troposphere/Lower-Stratosphere from 6U- Class Satellites: Tropospheric Water and Cloud ICE (TWICE) NASA Earth Science Technology Forum (ESTF 2017) June 13-15, 2017 Caltech, Pasadena, CA Steven C. Reising 1 , Pekka Kangaslahti 2 , Erich Schlecht 2 , Jonathan Jiang 2 , Xavier Bosch-Lluis 1 , Mehmet Ogut 1 , Yuriy Goncharenko 1 , Sharmila Padmanabhan 2 , Richard Cofield 2 , Nacer Chahat 2 , Shannon T. Brown 2 , William Deal 3 , Alex Zamora 3 , Kevin Leong 3 , Sean Shih 3 , and Gerry Mei 3 1 Microwave Systems Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA 2 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA 3 Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems, Redondo Beach, CA, USA

Upload: others

Post on 19-Feb-2022

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Enabling Observations of Temperature and Humidity Profiles

Reising et al., A2P3 ESTF 2017, Caltech, Pasadena, CA June 13, 2017 1

Enabling Observations of Temperature and Humidity Profiles and Cloud Ice

Particle Size Distribution in the Upper-Troposphere/Lower-Stratosphere from 6U-Class Satellites: Tropospheric Water and

Cloud ICE (TWICE)

NASA Earth Science Technology Forum (ESTF 2017) June 13-15, 2017 Caltech, Pasadena, CA

Steven C. Reising1, Pekka Kangaslahti2, Erich Schlecht2, Jonathan Jiang2, Xavier Bosch-Lluis1, Mehmet Ogut1, Yuriy Goncharenko1,

Sharmila Padmanabhan2, Richard Cofield2, Nacer Chahat2, Shannon T. Brown2, William Deal3, Alex Zamora3,

Kevin Leong3, Sean Shih3, and Gerry Mei3

1Microwave Systems Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA 2Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA

3Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems, Redondo Beach, CA, USA

Page 2: Enabling Observations of Temperature and Humidity Profiles

Reising et al., A2P3 ESTF 2017, Caltech, Pasadena, CA June 13, 2017 2

•  NASA’s Earth Science Focus Areas: –  Climate Variability and Change –  Water & Energy Cycle

•  Addressing Scientific Needs: –  Measure water vapor and cloud ice at a variety of local times

•  Addresses limitations of current microwave sensors in sun-synchronous orbits

–  Enable global measurements throughout the diurnal cycle of: •  water vapor profiles in the upper troposphere / lower

stratosphere (UTLS) •  cloud ice particle size distribution and ice water content in both

clean and polluted environments. –  Current understanding of UTLS processes in general circulation

models (GCMs) is limited. Such measurements can improve both climate predictions and knowledge of their uncertainties.

Tropospheric Water and Cloud ICE (TWICE) Scientific Objectives

Page 3: Enabling Observations of Temperature and Humidity Profiles

Reising et al., A2P3 ESTF 2017, Caltech, Pasadena, CA June 13, 2017 3

TWICE Scientific Motivation

•  Aerosols and Clouds –  Clouds represent the largest uncertainty in climate model predictions. –  Clouds in polluted environments tend to have smaller water droplets and

ice crystals than those in cleaner environments (“first indirect effect”).

•  TWICE Radiometer Instrument In tandem with other instruments providing aerosol information, the TWICE instrument: –  Can provide cloud ice particle size

information in both polluted and clean environments

–  Can determine the influence of aerosol pollution on cloud particle size spectrum

−  Polluted clouds are less likely to generate rainfall, increasing the cloud water content (“second indirect effect”) and are brighter (have higher albedo) than clean clouds

:

Page 4: Enabling Observations of Temperature and Humidity Profiles

Reising et al., A2P3 ESTF 2017, Caltech, Pasadena, CA June 13, 2017 4

TWICE Cloud Ice Particle Size Information

–  High atmospheric opacity at sub-millimeter wavelengths allows the measurement of ice in clouds above the freezing level through scattering.

–  Measured brightness temperatures decrease due to ice particle scattering at sub-mm-wave frequencies.

–  Modeled brightness temperature decrease due to scattering shown at right; adapted from S. Buehler et al., QJRMS, 2007.

670 310 240 GHz

–  NASA’s A-Train provides limited cloud particle size information. •  CloudSat: 94-GHz radar (Estimate particle size from IWC & T for

particles > 1 mm) •  Aqua’s MODIS: 10-µm infrared radiometer (< 100 µm)

–  Sub-millimeter wave radiometry can fill the gap by providing cloud particle size information between ~50 µm and ~1 mm.

Page 5: Enabling Observations of Temperature and Humidity Profiles

Reising et al., A2P3 ESTF 2017, Caltech, Pasadena, CA June 13, 2017 5

Channel Center frequency ±Offset frequency Bandwidth1 118.75 1.1 0.42 118.75 1.5 0.43 118.75 2.1 0.84 118.75 5.0 2.05 183.31 1.0 0.56 183.31 3.0 1.07 183.31 6.6 1.58 243.20 2.5 3.09 310.00 2.5 3.010 380.20 0.75 0.711 380.20 1.80 1.012 380.20 3.35 1.713 380.20 6.20 3.614 664.00 4.20 4.0

(a)

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3Weight Function (K/m)

0

5

10

15

20

Alti

tude

(km

)

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3

0

5

10

15

20

Ch5Ch6Ch7

(b)

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3Weight Function (K/m)

0

5

10

15

20

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3

0

5

10

15

20

Ch10Ch11Ch12Ch13

(c)

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3Weight Function (K/m)

0

5

10

15

20

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3

0

5

10

15

20

Ch1Ch2Ch3Ch4

(d)

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3Weight Function (K/m)

0

5

10

15

20

Alti

tude

(km

)

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3

0

5

10

15

20

Ch8

(e)

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3Weight Function (K/m)

0

5

10

15

20

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3

0

5

10

15

20

Ch9

(f)

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3Weight Function (K/m)

0

5

10

15

20

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3

0

5

10

15

20

Ch14

183 GHz Water Vapor

380 GHz Water Vapor

118 GHz Temperature

Weighting functions (K/m)

TWICE Water Vapor Profiling

•  Measurements near water vapor absorption l ines provide vertical profile i n f o r m a t i o n t h r o u g h pressure broadening.

•  183 GHz and 380 GHz were chosen to retrieve w a t e r v a p o r i n t h e troposphere and upper t r o p o s p h e r e / l o w e r stratosphere (UTLS).

•  To constrain the water vapor retrievals, 118 GHz c h a n n e l s m e a s u r e in format ion about the temperature profile using the O2 absorption line. [J. Jiang et al., Earth and Space Science, in review, 2017].

Page 6: Enabling Observations of Temperature and Humidity Profiles

Reising et al., A2P3 ESTF 2017, Caltech, Pasadena, CA June 13, 2017 6

•  We have developed a simulation and retrieval system based on Bayesian methodology [Evans et al., 2002; 2012] for the 15 TWICE frequencies. Simultaneous retrievals are performed for the following quantities:

•  Cloud ice particle size (De), ice water content (IWC), water vapor Content (H2O), temperature (T) profiles, and relative humidity (RH) profiles.

•  Results show that the TWICE instrument is capable of retrieving ice particle size in the range of ~50 to 1000 �m with better than 50% uncertainty, filling the gap in ice cloud particle size retrieval using existing space-borne remote sensing modalities.

•  Uncertainties for other TWICE retrievals are about 1K for temperature, < 50% for IWC and < 20% for H2O.  

Simulation of Cloud Ice, Humidity and Temperature Measurements from TWICE

[J. Jiang et al., Earth & Space Science, in review, 2017]

Page 7: Enabling Observations of Temperature and Humidity Profiles

Reising et al., A2P3 ESTF 2017, Caltech, Pasadena, CA June 13, 2017 7

Simulated TWICE Radiance (K)

-140 -130 -120 -110 -100 -90Longitude

200

220

240

260

280

300

Radi

ance

(K)

Simulated TWICE Radiance (K)

-140 -130 -120 -110 -100 -90Longitude

200

220

240

260

280

300

Radi

ance

(K)

Ch 1

Ch 2

Ch 3

Ch 4

Ch5

Ch 6

Ch 7

Ch 8

Ch 9

Ch 10

Ch 11

Ch 12

Ch 13

Ch 14

0 50 100 150 200 250Mean Dme (µm)

02468

101214

Alti

tude

(km

)

-250 -150 -50 50 150 250Mean Dme Error (µm)

02468

101214

0 50 100 150 200Mean IWC (mg/m3)

02468

101214

Alti

tude

(km

)

-350 -250 -150 -50 50 150 250 350Mean IWC Error (mg/m3)

02468

101214

0 5 10 15 20Mean H2O (kg/kg)

02468

101214

Alti

tude

(km

)

-5 -3 -1 1 3 5Mean H2O Error (kg/kg)

02468

101214

200 220 240 260 280 300Mean T (K)

02468

101214

Alti

tude

(km

)-5 -3 -1 1 3 5

Mean T Error (K)

02468

101214

-5 -3 -1 1 3 5Mean T Error (K)

02468

101214

30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Mean RH (%)

02468

101214

Alti

tude

(km

)

-50 -30 -10 10 30 50Mean RH Error (%)

02468

101214

-50 -30 -10 10 30 50Mean RH Error (%)

02468

101214

Figure above: The simulated radiance brightness temperatures as “seen” by the TWICE frequency channels as it “flies” over a set of “truth” profiles provided by a WRF model output. Figure at right: Left column shows the mean truth (solid) and mean retrieved (dashed) profiles of Dme, IWC, H2O, T, and RH. Right column shows the mean retrieval error and RMS error of the mean profiles.

Results of Simulation of Cloud Ice and Humidity Measurements from TWICE

Page 8: Enabling Observations of Temperature and Humidity Profiles

Reising et al., A2P3 ESTF 2017, Caltech, Pasadena, CA June 13, 2017 8

Tropospheric Water and Cloud Ice Instrument Block Diagram

Page 9: Enabling Observations of Temperature and Humidity Profiles

Reising et al., A2P3 ESTF 2017, Caltech, Pasadena, CA June 13, 2017 9

Parameter

Channel Center Frequency 118 GHz sounder

183 GHz sounder 240 GHz 310 GHz 380 GHz

sounder 670 GHz

Channel Bandwidth

Offset frequencies

from +10 MHz to +8.5 GHz

Offset frequencies

from -10 MHz to

-8.5 GHz

10 GHz 10 GHz

Offset frequencies

from -10 MHz to

-8.5 GHz

20 GHz

Passband Ripple (max) ± 2 dB ± 2 dB ± 2 dB ± 2 dB ± 2 dB ± 5 dB

System Noise Figure (goal: minimize) ≤ 7 dB ≤ 7 dB ≤ 7 dB ≤ 7 dB ≤ 7 dB ≤ 13 dB

NEDT (� = 1s) (K) < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

DC Power (W) Proposed Spec. 8 0.6 4 0.6

CBE 4.53 0.35 2.31 0.54

Mass (kg) Proposed Spec. 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.5

CBE 0.55 0.1 0.3 0.09

TWICE Instrument Measurement Frequencies and Specifications

Quasi-Window Frequencies (3) for Cloud Ice Particle Sizing Temperature and Humidity Sounding Frequencies

Page 10: Enabling Observations of Temperature and Humidity Profiles

Reising et al., A2P3 ESTF 2017, Caltech, Pasadena, CA June 13, 2017 10

Mass and Power Consumption for each TWICE Subsystem

Subsystem Mass (kg) Power (W)

118-183 GHz Sounder 0.55 4.53

240 GHz & 310 GHz Radiometers

0.1 0.35

380 GHz Sounder 0.3 2.31

670 GHz Radiometers (H&V) 0.09 0.54

Back-end Board 0.13 0.73

Power Regulation Board 0.13 3.00

Optics 0.40 -

Calibration Target/Reflector 0.71 -

Scanning Motor 0.33 1.00

Totals 2.74 12.46

Page 11: Enabling Observations of Temperature and Humidity Profiles

Reising et al., A2P3 ESTF 2017, Caltech, Pasadena, CA June 13, 2017 11

Millimeter-wave Radiometers for Temperature & Water Vapor Sounding

RF WR-5

LNA Mixer LO WR-10

XRF LO I

Q

RF WR-8

LO WR-15

ASIC IF processor designed by B. Razavi (UCLA)

Technology developed and demonstrated for GeoSTAR and HAMMR airborne instruments

118 GHz Receiver Module 183 GHz Receiver Module

Page 12: Enabling Observations of Temperature and Humidity Profiles

Reising et al., A2P3 ESTF 2017, Caltech, Pasadena, CA June 13, 2017 12

Temperature and humidity sounders near 118 and 183 GHz, respectively, have been successfully demonstrated as part of the HAMMR instrument for 68 flight hours aboard Twin Otter aircraft. Flights were conducted over inland water bodies as well as nearly the entire U.S. west coast.

High-frequency Airborne Microwave and Millimeter-wave Radiometer

Page 13: Enabling Observations of Temperature and Humidity Profiles

Reising et al., A2P3 ESTF 2017, Caltech, Pasadena, CA June 13, 2017 13

TWICE Instrument for 6U-Class Satellites

-  Three frequency bands in one Gregorian quasi-optical subsystem -  Conical scanning with 9.5-cm primary reflector -  Cold sky and ambient target calibration each scan (60 rpm)

Primary reflector Secondary

reflector

Earth scene radiation

Receiver electronics

Cold Sky calibration (2.73 K)

Scanning mechanism

Ambient calibration

target

Radiometer receivers

6U-Class spacecraft

chassis 34 X 20 X 10 cm

Page 14: Enabling Observations of Temperature and Humidity Profiles

Reising et al., A2P3 ESTF 2017, Caltech, Pasadena, CA June 13, 2017 14

118-183 GHz feed horn and

integrated receiver Secondary

reflector

230-390 GHz feed horn and

integrated receiver

670 GHz receivers (two

orthogonal polarizations)

•  Large focal plane enabled by oversized secondary reflector.

•  Feed horns angled to minimize the total area of the antenna beams on the primary reflector.

•  Four feed horns, all fabricated inside front-end modules to minimize waveguide loss:

•  670 GHz (two orthogonal polarizations),

•  230‒390 GHz •  118–183 GHz

Primary reflector

TWICE Instrument Quasi-Optics Design

Page 15: Enabling Observations of Temperature and Humidity Profiles

Reising et al., A2P3 ESTF 2017, Caltech, Pasadena, CA June 13, 2017 15

•  All frequencies simulated, achieving main beam efficiencies > 90 % •  Half-power bandwidths from 1.5° to 0.6° across frequency range •  Corresponds to 16 km to 6 km footprint size (cross-track) from 400-km altitude

TWICE Feed Horn Patterns Simulated in Optical Subsystem

Page 16: Enabling Observations of Temperature and Humidity Profiles

Reising et al., A2P3 ESTF 2017, Caltech, Pasadena, CA June 13, 2017 16

TWICE Calibration Target Design

2

3 1

1 – Cold Sky Reflector. 2 – Calibration Target: Original Design. 3 - Calibration Target: Modified Design. Advantages of modified design:

•  Reduces size of antenna footprint, •  Partially shades target from solar intrusion, •  Reduces thermal inhomogeneity.

Page 17: Enabling Observations of Temperature and Humidity Profiles

Reising et al., A2P3 ESTF 2017, Caltech, Pasadena, CA June 13, 2017 17

TWICE Near Field Antenna Pattern Simulations

Antenna Near-Field Footprint (Optical Approach)

Antenna near-field footprint near 118 GHz

Antenna Footprint on the Horizontal Plane

Antenna Footprint on the 45°-Tilted Plane

Calibration Plane

Optical Approach

Page 18: Enabling Observations of Temperature and Humidity Profiles

Reising et al., A2P3 ESTF 2017, Caltech, Pasadena, CA June 13, 2017 18

TWICE Conical Scanning and Calibration Strategy

Page 19: Enabling Observations of Temperature and Humidity Profiles

Reising et al., A2P3 ESTF 2017, Caltech, Pasadena, CA June 13, 2017 19

TWICE Instrument Top-Level Interface Control Diagram

Analog Signals Digital Signals Power Supplies Ground Station

On-Board Computer

ScanningMotor

Thermistors

Radiometer Front-ends

C&DH Board

Power Regulation

Board Analog Signal Conditioning

(ADCs)

FPGA

Analog Digital

CubeSat DC Bus Voltage

GPS/IMU

Ground Station

UHF Communication (CubeSat Transceiver)

Page 20: Enabling Observations of Temperature and Humidity Profiles

Reising et al., A2P3 ESTF 2017, Caltech, Pasadena, CA June 13, 2017 20

•  The Tropospheric Water and Cloud ICE (TWICE) is a 6U-Class satellite instrument under development to enable global measurements of upper-tropospheric/lower stratospheric (ULTS) cloud ice and water vapor at a variety of local times.

•  These global measurements are expected to improve currently limited understanding of general circulation model (GCM) cloud processes, improving both climate predictions and knowledge of their uncertainty.

•  Cloud ice particle sizing is needed in both clean and polluted clouds to study the indirect effects of aerosols throughout the diurnal cycle.

•  TWICE will perform measurements at 15 frequencies from 118 GHz to 670 GHz to yield ice cloud particle size information and total ice water content as well as atmospheric profiling of temperature and water vapor.

•  Conical scanning will preserve the polarization basis and enable external calibration at all 15 frequencies using cold sky and an ambient target.

•  The TWICE instrument will meet the size, weight and power (SWaP) requirements for deployment in a 6U-Class satellite.

TWICE Summary

Page 21: Enabling Observations of Temperature and Humidity Profiles

Reising et al., A2P3 ESTF 2017, Caltech, Pasadena, CA June 13, 2017 21

Many thanks to George Komar, Bob Bauer, Parminder Ghuman, Keith Murray, Pam Millar, Charles Norton and many others at ESTO who have continually supported Earth Science technology development over the years.