Emmanuel College’s

Total-Green Initiative

By: Owen Imparato and Barrett Wingard

EC Current State Front of House

Recycling in Cafeteria

LED Lights in Buildings

Paper/Cardboard/Printing Recycling Initiatives

SWOT Strengths:

Positive brand image

Fully sustainable facilities both help the earth and save money

Weaknesses: New sustainable ideas and large land

purchases can be very expensive

Urban setting present road blocks

SWOT cont. Opportunities:

Revenue gain from positive external perception

Purchasing land allows for free range modification for sustainability endeavors

Threats: Competition from business hosting retreats

Economy not focused on Green activity expansion

Method of Improvement

Purchase large amount of land for conservation

Build fully sustainable retreat style building

Use facility to teach sustainability benefits/practices through rental retreats

Triple Bottom Line The Company:

Can increase applicants and enrolment by 15%

Brand name will be first in “Green” institutions

The Earth: Large acreage of land conservations

Fully sustainable renewable resources, no non-renewable resources

The People: More people are interested in “Green” colleges

New and more common spread of “Green” Lifestyle

Concept Overview Fully Sustainable as

New Standard of Green Colleges

Solar/Well Water/Geothermal/Renewable resources

Stewardship Land Conservation

Overview of Solutions Using products that

are domestic/sustainable/clean

Education of sustainability lifestyle and benefits

Doing our partof stewardship

Future State Emmanuel College will

be the leading name in “Green Institutions”

New corporate and university relations

New advancements in education/internships/careers

6 Sigma Define: Emmanuel’s “Green” efforts are little to

none

Measure: Improvements in Boston are limited, can’t improve much on campus

Analysis: Campus is to small and has already established buildings for any significant changes

Improve: Purchase large land conservation with retreat for educational and financial profits

Control: School and outside institutes use and pay for learning services

Financial/Operations Map

Expenses: Revenue:Land $1,250,000.00 Weekend Rented 42Building $3,000,000.00 Cost/Week 15,000Employees $3,000,000.00 Total Rental/Year 630000Facility Eq. $150,000.00 Variable Revenue 110,000Total Cost $7,400,000.00 Total Year $740,000.00

Ten Year Break Even

Land17%

Building41%

Employees41%

Facility Eq.2%

Indicial Cost of Facilities

Process of Operations Summary

EC improvements

Retreat construction

Total “Green” financial and lifestyle success