emission line surveys lecture 1 mauro giavalisco space telescope science institute university of...
DESCRIPTION
Disclaimer We wrote these lectures from the point of view of the “observer” We wrote these lectures from the point of view of the “observer” They do not aim at providing a complete review of emission line surveys and their results They do not aim at providing a complete review of emission line surveys and their results Rather, the choice of material is aimed at maximizing pedagogical value, illustrating current interesting problems, and at helping potential observers planning and designing their own emission line surveys Rather, the choice of material is aimed at maximizing pedagogical value, illustrating current interesting problems, and at helping potential observers planning and designing their own emission line surveys It also reflects our personal tastes and bias It also reflects our personal tastes and bias Readers are strongly encouraged to do further, comparative research in any specific subject discussed here Readers are strongly encouraged to do further, comparative research in any specific subject discussed hereTRANSCRIPT
Emission Line SurveysLecture 1
Mauro GiavaliscoMauro GiavaliscoSpace Telescope Science InstituteSpace Telescope Science Institute
University of Massachusetts, AmherstUniversity of Massachusetts, Amherst11
11From January 2007From January 2007
Outline DefinitionsDefinitions
Why emission linesWhy emission lines Types of surveys and methodologyTypes of surveys and methodology
Target surveysTarget surveys Blind surveysBlind surveys
SensitivitySensitivity Narrow-band imagingNarrow-band imaging Slit spectroscopySlit spectroscopy Slitless spectroscopySlitless spectroscopy
Observational techniquesObservational techniques Results from Emission Line SurveysResults from Emission Line Surveys
Historical notesHistorical notes Discussion of recent and ongoing surveysDiscussion of recent and ongoing surveys
MethodologyMethodology ResultsResults
Future prospectsFuture prospects
Disclaimer We wrote these lectures from the point of view of the We wrote these lectures from the point of view of the
“observer”“observer” They do not aim at providing a complete review of emission They do not aim at providing a complete review of emission
line surveys and their resultsline surveys and their results Rather, the choice of material is aimed at maximizing Rather, the choice of material is aimed at maximizing
pedagogical value, illustrating current interesting problems, pedagogical value, illustrating current interesting problems, and at helping potential observers planning and designing and at helping potential observers planning and designing their own emission line surveystheir own emission line surveys
It also reflects our personal tastes and biasIt also reflects our personal tastes and bias Readers are strongly encouraged to do further, comparative Readers are strongly encouraged to do further, comparative
research in any specific subject discussed here research in any specific subject discussed here
Why Emission Line Surveys To To effectivelyeffectively look for a specific class of sources in some look for a specific class of sources in some
pre-assigned volumepre-assigned volume of spaceof space and/or at some and/or at some pre-assigned pre-assigned point in timepoint in time
““effectively”: effectively”: with high yield (low contamination) and in with high yield (low contamination) and in large numberslarge numbers
Exploit the presence of emission line in the spectral Exploit the presence of emission line in the spectral energy distribution of most astrophysical sourcesenergy distribution of most astrophysical sources
Traditional flux selection plus follow-up spectroscopy Traditional flux selection plus follow-up spectroscopy highly inefficient to cull special classes of sources from highly inefficient to cull special classes of sources from the general countsthe general counts
Notations, Definitions, Reminders and World Model. I
Throughout these lectures, we use:Throughout these lectures, we use: F: flux, in units of erg/s/cmF: flux, in units of erg/s/cm22
ff: flux density, in units of erg/s/cm: flux density, in units of erg/s/cm22/Hz/Hz ff: flux density, in units of erg/s/cm: flux density, in units of erg/s/cm22//ÅÅ
ffff •• |d |d/d/d = f = f •• c/ c/22
1 1 ÅÅ = 10 = 10-8-8 cm cmc = 2.9979 c = 2.9979 • • 10101010 cm/s cm/s
Notations, Definitions, Reminders and World Model. II
Throughout these lectures, we use:Throughout these lectures, we use: L: luminosity, in units of erg/sL: luminosity, in units of erg/s ll: luminosity density, in units of erg/s/Hz: luminosity density, in units of erg/s/Hz ll: luminosity density, in units of erg/s/: luminosity density, in units of erg/s/ÅÅ
ff = l = l • (1+z)• (1+z) / 4/ 4 • D• DLL22(z)(z)
ff = l = l / 4/ 4 • D• DLL22(z) • (1+z)(z) • (1+z)
F = L / 4F = L / 4 • D• DLL22(z) (z)
• DDLL(z) = D(z) = DLL(z; (z; HH00, , mm, , ) : luminosity distance) : luminosity distance• z is the redshift defined as z = a(tz is the redshift defined as z = a(t00)/a(t) – 1)/a(t) – 1• t is the cosmic time and tt is the cosmic time and t00 is the age of the universe is the age of the universe
Notations, Definitions, Reminders and World Model. III
Throughout these lectures, we use:Throughout these lectures, we use: AB magnitudes: AB magnitudes:
mmABAB = -2.5 = -2.5 • • LogLog1010(f(f) - 48.595 ) - 48.595 • (Oke 1974; Oke & Gunn 1977)(Oke 1974; Oke & Gunn 1977)
ST magnitudesST magnitudesmmSTST = -2.5 = -2.5 • • LogLog1010(f(f) - 21.1) - 21.1
• (Walsh 1995)(Walsh 1995) World Model (when needed):World Model (when needed):
HH00 = 70 km/s/Mpc = 70 km/s/Mpcmm = 0.3; = 0.3; = 0.7 = 0.7
CCD and near-IR Detectors Most common devices used in emission line surveysMost common devices used in emission line surveys Photon counting devices:Photon counting devices:
DN = G DN = G • • NN DN: Calibrated Data Number, I.e. what we read from the detector after DN: Calibrated Data Number, I.e. what we read from the detector after
calibrationscalibrations G: inverse gainG: inverse gain NN: number of photons, in a finite wavelength interval : number of photons, in a finite wavelength interval
Detectors add their own “signal” and noise:Detectors add their own “signal” and noise: DNDNobsobs = DN + K + = DN + K +
is removed during calibration (bias + d.c. + …)is removed during calibration (bias + d.c. + …) is a random variable with is a random variable with
• <<• < < ronron22
rmsrms + d.c. + d.c.22rmsrms + … + …
• Typical values:Typical values:– [ron[ron22
rmsrms]]1/21/2 ~ a few (as low as ~1) to a few 10 e ~ a few (as low as ~1) to a few 10 e- - /pix/pix– [d.c.[d.c.22
rmsrms]]1/21/2 ~ 0.01 to a few e ~ 0.01 to a few e--/sec/pix/sec/pix Let’s assume G=1 in the followingLet’s assume G=1 in the following
The Finite Resolution element The smallest spatial scale or wavelength interval the instrumentation The smallest spatial scale or wavelength interval the instrumentation
can resolve:can resolve: Spatial (PSF): the seeing (ground) or diffraction limit (space)Spatial (PSF): the seeing (ground) or diffraction limit (space)
• Good (bad) seeing: 0.6 (2) arcsecGood (bad) seeing: 0.6 (2) arcsec• HST resolution (V band): 0.03 arcsecHST resolution (V band): 0.03 arcsec
Depends on the size of the telescope, wavelength and… luck!Depends on the size of the telescope, wavelength and… luck!• Poor image quality spreads photons over a large area, adds Poor image quality spreads photons over a large area, adds
noise (2x seeing = 4x noise)noise (2x seeing = 4x noise) Spectroscopic (resolution): the spectral resolution elementSpectroscopic (resolution): the spectral resolution element
Depends on the dispersion of the spectral element (prism, Depends on the dispersion of the spectral element (prism, grism, grating) and on the slit aperturegrism, grating) and on the slit aperture
If pixel size is well matched to resolution element (Nyquist If pixel size is well matched to resolution element (Nyquist sampling): FWHM (of PSF or LSF) covered by 4 pixelssampling): FWHM (of PSF or LSF) covered by 4 pixels
S/N: Signal-to-Noise Ratio
Most important metric to asses sensitivity.Most important metric to asses sensitivity. S/N in some finite wavelength interval S/N in some finite wavelength interval either the passband either the passband
width or the spectral resolution element width or the spectral resolution element since we detect (count) photons, uncertainty on photon counting since we detect (count) photons, uncertainty on photon counting
is simply is simply = N = N1/21/2, and thus:, and thus:
S/N = SS/N = S / [S / [S + B + B + N + N22]]1/21/2
SS: number of photons from source: number of photons from source BB: number of photons from background: number of photons from background NN: equivalent number of photons from additional sources of : equivalent number of photons from additional sources of
noise (typically detector)noise (typically detector)
Width of Emission Lines
The finite width of an emission line along the wavelength axis.The finite width of an emission line along the wavelength axis. Commonly measured by the Full Width at Half Maximum Commonly measured by the Full Width at Half Maximum
(FWHM). For a gaussian line profile:(FWHM). For a gaussian line profile: ~ 0.425 ~ 0.425 •• FWHM FWHM
The line width reflects the kinematics of the emission region The line width reflects the kinematics of the emission region (kinematics of the gas or of the individual sources in the case of (kinematics of the gas or of the individual sources in the case of integrated emission). If v is a measure of the velocity field within integrated emission). If v is a measure of the velocity field within the emission regionthe emission region / / = = v / cv / c
If source is at redshift z, wavelengths are “stretched” by (1+z), thus If source is at redshift z, wavelengths are “stretched” by (1+z), thus observed FWHM and rest-frame FWHM related by:observed FWHM and rest-frame FWHM related by: FWHM(obs) = FWHM(rest) FWHM(obs) = FWHM(rest) • • (1+z)(1+z)
Equivalent Width of Emission Lines
Metric to asses the strength of an emission line.Metric to asses the strength of an emission line. The width of a top-hat emission line of equal luminosity and peak The width of a top-hat emission line of equal luminosity and peak
value equal to the continuum at the line wavelengthvalue equal to the continuum at the line wavelength It represents the wavelength range over which the continuum It represents the wavelength range over which the continuum
luminosity equals the line luminosityluminosity equals the line luminosity
WW = L / l = L / l = F / f = F / f
Unaffected by extinction (line and continuum extinct by equal amount)Unaffected by extinction (line and continuum extinct by equal amount) If source is at redshift z, wavelengths are “stretched” by (1+z), but If source is at redshift z, wavelengths are “stretched” by (1+z), but
luminosity (number of photons) is conserved. Thus, observed Wluminosity (number of photons) is conserved. Thus, observed W and and rest-frame Wrest-frame W related by related by WW(obs) = W(obs) = W(rest) (rest) • • (1+z)(1+z)
How to Detect Emission Lines
Directly: observing the spectra of some Directly: observing the spectra of some class of candidatesclass of candidates
Indirectly: comparing the photometry of the Indirectly: comparing the photometry of the line through narrow-band passbands (on-line through narrow-band passbands (on-band images) to that of the continuum band images) to that of the continuum through either narrow or broad-band through either narrow or broad-band passbands (off-band images) passbands (off-band images)
How to Detect Emission Lines: Spectroscopy
Spectroscopy
Lyz=5.65
Vanzella et al., in prep.
How to Detect Emission Lines: Photometry
Finding galaxies at high-redshift: color selection
B435 V606 z850
Unattenuated Spectrum Spectrum
Attenuated by IGM
B435 V606 i775 z850
z~4
1. Color selection is very efficient in finding galaxies with specific spectral types in a pre-assigned redshift range
2. Wide variety of methods available, targeting a range of redshifts, galaxies’ SEDs:
• Lyman and Balmer break (Steidel et al., GOODS)
• BX/BM (Adelberger et al.,
COSMOS)• DRG (van Dokkum et al.,
GOODS)• BzK (Daddi et al.)• Photo-z (Mobasher et al)
Here, the case of “Lyman-break galaxies”
How to Detect Emission Lines: Photometry
How to Detect Emission Lines: Photometry
Source Selection
Source Selection
Emission-Line Sources
Weeding Out Interlopers
Spectroscopy Follow-up: the Interlopers
Spectroscopy Follow-up: the Targets
Spectroscopy Follow-up: the Targets