emergent bilingual data and report in ilwhole child whole school whole community 12 2019 bilingual...

Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 1

Emergent Bilingual Data and Report in IL

Dr. Seon H. Eun, Data Strategies and AnalyticsDr. Shuwan Chiu, Research and Evaluation

Illinois State Board of Education

Multilingual Illinois 2019 ConferenceDecember 5, 2019

Hilton/Oak Brook Hills Conference CenterOak Brook, IL


Agenda

❑Emergent Bilingual (EB) Data Collection

❑Bilingual Ed. Program Delivery Report

❑Emergent Bilingual Data Reports

❑Demographic, Program, Placement, Funding, Performance data

❑Questions


A Brief about Bilingual Ed. Program Delivery Report (PDR)

❑ Annual Data collection for Bilingual Education Program Implementation in IL Districts.

❑ District level data collection❑ Districts that received state and/or federal funds for EL program

services have been required to submit the report. ❑ Approximately 300 or more districts have been identified and

required to PDR submission every year.❑ Located in IWAS under Annual Reporting❑ Collection Timeline: May-July❑ The Bilingual Ed. PDR collections have been modified to reflect

changes in federal and state rules and regs and to streamline data collection.

❑ Generates data for federal and state reports.


Bilingual Ed. PDR: How to Login to IWAS- Go to ISBE.NET

• Access the PDR through ISBE’s Web Application Security System (IWAS)

• Link to IWAS from ISBE’s Homepage: https://www.isbe.net/

https://www.isbe.net/


How to Login to IWAS- Enter Login Info.

• Enter Login information or select the Sign Up Now link


How to Login to IWAS-System Listing


How to login to IWAS- Bilingual ED. PDR


PDR Communication via IWAS


PDR Submission Follow up


Bilingual Ed. PDR Submission Rate

2019 Bilingual Ed. PDR Cohort Districts (*updated) SD # SD %

EBF ($5,000 or higher) only 76 SDs 25%

EBF ($5,000 or higher) and Title III LIPLEPs 223 SDs 72%

Title III LIPLEPs only 9 SDs 3%

Total 308 SDs 100%

Bilingual Ed. PDR Submission Rate

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (*updated)

PDR cohort 304 SDs 310 SDs 307 SDs 310 SDs 308 SDs

Submitted 304 SDs 310 SDs 303 SDs 310 SDs 308 SDs

Not Submitted 0 0 4 SDs 0 0

Submission Rate 100% 100% 99% 100% 100%

Illinois Districts that received State TBE/TPI and/or Title III LIPLEPs were required for The PDR submission. Due to changes in state funding formula, there is no TBE/TPI funds. Districts that received EBF ($5,000) and/or Title III LIPLEPs have been required for 2019 PDR Submission.


2019 Bilingual Ed. PDR in IWAS


2019 Bilingual Ed. PDR StructureIL Districts that received $5,000 or more of state Evidence-Based Funding (EBF) and/or federal Title III LIPLEPs funds in FY2019 MUST submit this report.

A. Type of Program Funding (Select only one)

State EBF for EL services only ($5,000 or more) State EBF for EL services ($5,000 or more) and Federal Title III LIPLEPs Federal Title III LIPLEPs only

B. Program areas

• Question 1: EL Teachers in the current year

• Question 2: EL Teachers in the future years

• Question 3: EL Topics of Staff Development

• Question 4: Participants of Staff Development

• Question 5: Resources for EL parents/families

• Question 6: Extended program services to ELs


Other Bilingual Data Collections• Student Information System (SIS): student level data Language, Race,

Country,

EL Placement,

EL Services provided,

EL Program models,

Dual Language,

EL Screener,

ACCESS Scores,

Immigrant Education

Program,

Seal of Bilieracy,

etc…


Emergent Bilingual Data Reports

• Consolidated State Performance Report (CSPR): – Annual data report for IL performance submitted to ED. – Reporting multiple programs, service delivery and performance that

received federal Title funding. EB data section is a part of it.

• State Statistical Data Reports:– Annual data reports: Annual Report, Annual Statistical Report,

Bilingual Statistical Report, etc…

• Reports include EL enrollment, funding, program, demographics, student performance…

https://www.isbe.net/Pages/Data-Analysis-Reports.aspx

This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed

https://www.isbe.net/Pages/Data-Analysis-Reports.aspx

http://www.oraclehome.com.br/2013/05/01/crs_stat-obsoleto-em-11gr2-e-quais-o-substituiram/


2018 Emergent Bilinguals by Language

Language # %

1 Spanish 176,271 71.41%

2 Arabic 9,298 3.77%

3 Polish 6,910 2.8%

4 Urdu 3,855 1.56%

5 Pilipino (Tagalog) 2,295 0.93%

6 Gujarati 2,242 0.91%

7 Russian 1,942 0.79%

8 Mandarin (Chinese) 1,920 0.78%

9 French 1,656 0.67%

10 Telugu (Telegu) 1,611 0.65%

11 Others 38,848 15.74%

Total 246,848 100%


Emergent Bilinguals Trend by Language

Top 10 Languages Spoken in IL

Native Language 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Spanish 166,594 165,152 174,401 173,482 174,971 176,271

Arabic 5,832 6,436 7,306 7,867 8,735 9,298

Polish 5,849 6,025 6,762 6,866 6,709 6,910

Urdu 2,824 2,820 3,307 3,584 3,788 3,855

Pilipino (Tagalog) 1,822 1,770 1,964 2,081 2,130 2,295

Gujarati 1,688 1,645 1,857 2,000 2,039 2,242

Russian 1,273 1,278 1,452 1,549 1,695 1,942

Mandarin (Chinese) 1,303 1,434 1,705 1,752 1,841 1,920Vietnamese 1,325 1,288 1,399 1,410 1,448 1,484

Cantonese (Chinese) 1,314 1,384 1,429 1,381 1,383 1,253


2018 Emergent Bilinguals By Location

30.44%

25.23%10.88%

8.40%

8.35%

4.04%

2.14%1.82%

1.04%1.02%

6.64%

2018 Emergent Bilinguals by Location

City of Chicago SD 299 Cook Kane Lake

Dupage Will Winnebago McHenry

Champaign Rock Island Other Counties


2018 Emergent Bilinguals by Race

Race/ Ethnicity

American Indian or

Alaska NativeAsian

Black or African

American

Hispanic or Latino

Two or More Races

Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Island

White Total

# 1,238 24,831 6,554 183,734 2,204 317 27,970 246,848

% 0.5% 10.1% 2.7% 74.4% 0.9% 0.1% 11.3% 100.0%

0.50% 10.10%2.70%

74.40%

0.90%

0.10%11.30%

2018 Emergent Bilinguals by Race

American Indian or Alaska Native Asian

Black or African American Hispanic or Latino

Two or More Races Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Island

White


2018 Emergent Bilinguals by GradeGrade # %

PreK 22,769 9.22%

K 26,768 10.84%

1 28,143 11.40%

2 28,193 11.42%

3 29,769 12.06%

4 29,332 11.88%

5 17,391 7.05%

6 11,683 4.73%

7 10,526 4.26%

8 9,352 3.79%

9 10,224 4.14%

10 9,481 3.84%

11 7,563 3.06%

12 5,654 2.29%

Total 246,848 100.00%

PreK K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Series1 9.22% 10.84 11.40 11.42 12.06 11.88 7.05% 4.73% 4.26% 3.79% 4.14% 3.84% 3.06% 2.29%

0.00%

2.00%

4.00%

6.00%

8.00%

10.00%

12.00%

14.00%

Enro

llmen

t %

Grade

2018 Emergent Bilinguals by Grade


Emergent Bilinguals by Disability (2018)

Grade No Disability Disability Total

# % # # # %

PreK 16,197 6.56% 6,572 2.66% 22,769 9.22%

KG 22,778 9.23% 3,990 1.62% 26,768 10.84%

1 24,018 9.73% 4,125 1.67% 28,143 11.40%

2 23,785 9.64% 4,408 1.79% 28,193 11.42%

3 25,128 10.18% 4,641 1.88% 29,769 12.06%

4 24,596 9.96% 4,736 1.92% 29,332 11.88%

5 13,019 5.27% 4,372 1.77% 17,391 7.05%

6 7,868 3.19% 3,815 1.55% 11,683 4.73%

7 6,961 2.82% 3,565 1.44% 10,526 4.26%

8 6,125 2.48% 3,227 1.31% 9,352 3.79%

9 7,103 2.88% 3,121 1.26% 10,224 4.14%

10 6,877 2.79% 2,604 1.05% 9,481 3.84%

11 5,201 2.11% 2,362 0.96% 7,563 3.06%

12 3,469 1.41% 2,185 0.89% 5,654 2.29%

Total 193,125 78.24% 53,723 21.76% 246,848 100.00%


EB Trend_ Top EB Districts

School District Name 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

City of Chicago SD 299 69,705 70,962 73,976 72,520 72,243 75,136

SD U-46 10,532 10,602 11,330 11,995 12,162 12,929

Cicero SD 99 7,408 6,973 7,043 6,836 6,466 6,717

Aurora East USD 131 5,655 5,339 5,376 5,233 5,553 5,881

Waukegan CUSD 60 5,303 5,167 5,615 5,557 5,585 5,849

Rockford SD 205 3,673 3,633 3,927 4,101 4,388 4,835

CUSD 300 2,671 2,498 3,125 3,224 3,277 3,654

Schaumburg CCSD 54 3,039 3,087 3,444 3,595 3,593 3,440

Palatine CCSD 15 2,795 2,817 2,982 3,116 3,228 3,405

Wheeling CCSD 21 2,629 2,525 2,772 2,794 2,786 2,944Other Large EB districts include Aurora West USD 219, Indiana Prairie CUSD 204, Comm Cons SD 59, etc..


2018 EB Placement_StatewideDistrict * Student**

# % # %

TBE Full time 266 16.53% 116,183 47.07%

TBE Part time 293 18.21% 58,163 23.56%

TPI 464 28.84% 54,598 22.12%

Other/Alternative*** 270 16.78% 1,594 0.65%

Parent Refused 307 19.08% 16,271 6.59%

No EL Placement 9 0.56% 39 0.02%

Total 1609 100.00% 246,848 100.00%

* Duplicated District EL Placement** Unduplicated student placement count*** Other/Alternative Placement: data concern

Data source: 2018 SIS


2018 EL Program Models_Statewide

4.7%

8.1%

19.7%

24.9%6.0%

22.2%

14.3%

0.02%

2018 EB Program Models

Dual language-Two Way (01) Dual language-One way (02)

Transitional Bilingual Program - Self Contained (03) Transitional Bilingual Program - Collaboration (04)

Transitional Program in English - Self-Contained (05) Transitional Program in English - Collaboration (06)

None of the Above (00) Missing Program Type


2018 District FundingNumber and Percentage of School Districts, by Type of Program Funding and EL

Enrollments

Type of EL Program funding Districts EL Enrollments

NumberPCT of Total Number PCT of Total

State -EBF funding 490 76.6% 245,790 99.6%

State -EBF funding only 255 39.8% 10,002 4.1%

State -EBF funding and Federal Title III LIPLEP funding 235 36.7% 235,788 95.5%

No State EBF funding 150 23.4% 1,058 0.4%

Total 640 100.0% 246,848 100.0%

*2018 State EBF (Evidence Based Funding) includes Base, Supplemental and Tier funding for ELS.* Out of a total of 866 SDs, 640 SDs report ELs in their district* Total SD 866 SDs (Including Elementary, High school, and Unit Districts plus State Charters)* Data source: 2018 Bilingual Education Program Delivery Report, SIS


2019 Seal of Biliteracy Awards

Commendation Seal Total

# % # % # %

Non-ELs 2,725 94.7% 6,108 98.25% 8,833 97.14%

ELs 151 5.25% 109 1.75% 260 2.86%

Total 2,876 100% 6,217 100% 9,093 100%

Student received Commendation

Student received Seal

Total

# % # % # %

2,876 31.63% 6,217 68.37% 9,093 100%

Seal of Biliteracy Award Total

Seal of Biliteracy Award By EL Status


2019 Seal of Biliteracy by languageLanguage Commendation Seal Total

# % # % # %

Arabic 10 0.3% 24 0.4% 34 0.4%

Bulgarian 0 0.0% 5 0.1% 5 0.1%

Cantonese (Chinese) 0 0.0% 5 0.1% 5 0.1%

English 2 0.1% 0 0.0% 2 0.0%

French 418 14.5% 437 7.0% 855 9.4%

German 160 5.6% 92 1.5% 252 2.8%

Greek 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 1 0.0%

Hebrew 9 0.3% 15 0.2% 24 0.3%

Hindi 2 0.1% 10 0.2% 12 0.1%

Italian 23 0.8% 31 0.5% 54 0.6%

Japanese 13 0.5% 35 0.6% 48 0.5%

Karen (S'gaw) 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 1 0.0%

Korean 5 0.2% 23 0.4% 28 0.3%

Latin 59 2.1% 55 0.9% 114 1.3%

Latvian 0 0.0% 2 0.0% 2 0.0%

Lithuanian 0 0.0% 3 0.0% 3 0.0%

Maay or Mai Mai 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 1 0.0%

Mandarin (Chinese) 37 1.3% 149 2.4% 186 2.0%

Other 9 0.3% 1 0.0% 10 0.1%

Pilipino (Tagalog) 0 0.0% 2 0.0% 2 0.0%

Polish 77 2.7% 135 2.2% 212 2.3%

Portuguese 4 0.1% 3 0.0% 7 0.1%

Russian 13 0.5% 37 0.6% 50 0.5%

Spanish 2033 70.7% 5144 82.7% 7177 78.9%

Swahili 0 0.0% 2 0.0% 2 0.0%

Thai 2 0.1% 1 0.0% 3 0.0%

Urdu 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 1 0.0%

Vietnamese 0 0.0% 2 0.0% 2 0.0%

Total 2876 100.0% 6217 100.0% 9093 100.0%


2019 Seal of Biliteracy by SchoolSchool Name Commendation Seal Total

J Sterling Morton East High School 101 298 399Barrington High School 182 137 319Glenbrook South High School 56 153 209Adlai E Stevenson High School 47 162 209York Comm High School 105 88 193

Bolingbrook High School 101 73 174

New Trier Township High School 0 154 154Lane Technical High School 0 149 149Lincoln-Way East High School 85 62 147Hinsdale Central High School 43 101 144

Lake Forest High School 67 69 136West Aurora High School 57 68 125Evanston Twp High School 47 76 123

South Elgin High School 90 31 121Young Magnet High School 0 120 120

Warren Township High School 49 71 120Glenbrook North High School 42 71 113Lake Park High School 64 49 113

Larkin High School 66 37 103J Sterling Morton West High School 31 71 102

Other IL High Schools 1,643 4,177 5,820Total 2,876 6,217 9,093


2018 EB Teacher Licensure

Type of Certificate All EL Teachers

Number of EL Teachers currently working in Title III

Language Instruction Educational Programs

NumberPCT of Total Number

PCT of All Teachers

Certificate with ESL Endorsements and/or Approval 4231 25.1% 4225 25.1%

Certificate with Bilingual Endorsements and/or Approval 2774 16.5% 2774 16.5%

Both ESL and Bilingual Endorsements 8193 48.6% 8193 48.7%

Type 29 (Transitional Bilingual Certificate) 32 0.2% 32 0.2%

English as a New Language (ENL) (Secondary only) 10 0.1% 10 0.1%

English as a New Language -Bilingual (Secondary only) 1445 8.6% 1444 8.6%

Visiting International Teaching Certificate 86 0.5% 86 0.5%

Other Certifications* 73 0.4% 73 0.4%

TOTAL: 16844 100.0% 16837 100.0%


2018 Professional Development on EL topics

180

132 127

107

56

185

152 147157

113 109

82

151

24

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

Dis

tric

t #

PD Topics

2018 PD Topics_Title III LIPLEP funded Districts


2018 PD Participants

60%19%

4%

4%

7%

1%1%

3%

2018 PD Participants

General Education teachers

EL classroom teachers

Principals

Administrators other than principals

Non-teaching staff/paraprofessionals

Non-administrative school personnel

Community Based OrganizationPersonnel

Other


ACCESS by PL

* K-12th only *Others includes ELs with Alt. ACCESS, Not tested, missing ACCESS scores.

12.61%

17.87%

38.14%

25.49%

5.42%

0.48%

8.12%

2018 ACCESS for ELLs by PL

Level 1- Emerging

Level 2-Beginning

Level 3-Developing

Level 4-Expanding

Level 5-Bridging

Level 6- Reaching

Others*


EB Exit (4.8 on ACCESS) by Grade

KG 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Total

Exit 2.90% 3.48% 5.87% 8.77% 25.78% 15.28% 1.71% 2.76% 3.19% 6.49% 6.60% 4.36% 2.81% 8.40%

No Exit 97.10% 96.52% 94.13% 91.23% 74.22% 84.72% 98.29% 97.24% 96.81% 93.51% 93.40% 95.64% 97.19% 91.61%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Grade

2018 EB Exit on ACCESS

No Exit Exit


EB Trend Data_ Exit RateSchool Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Exit cut on ACCESS 4.8/4.2 4.8/4.2 5.0/4.2/4.2 5.0/4.2/4.2 5.0/4.2/4.2 4.8 4.8

Exit Rate 18.7% 22.2% 12.7% 16.6% 16.3% 5.7% 8.4%

Year ELP cut score on ACCESS for ELLs

…2008 4.0 OCPL (Overall Composite PL) +local decision

2009 4.8 OCPL/4.2 LCPL (Literacy Composite PL)

2010 4.8 OCPL/4.2 LCPL

2011 4.8 OCPL/4.2 LCPL

2012 4.8 OCPL/4.2 LCPL

2013 4.8 OCPL/4.2 LCPL

2014 5.0 OCPL/ 4.2 Reading and 4.2 Writing

2015 5.0 OCPL/4.2 Reading and 4.2 Writing

2016 5.0 OCPL/4.2 Reading and 4.2 Writing

2017 4.8 OCPL

2018 4.8 OCPL

2019 4.8 OCPL


EB on PARCC and SAT2018 EB vs. Non-EBs on PARCC and SAT_ Reading

2018 Reading (% Meet or Exceed)

ELs Non-ELs

Grade 3_PARCC 18.2 41.6




Grade 7_PARCC 3 42.3


Grade 3-8_PARCC 11.4 40.2

Grade 11_SAT 1.4 38.4

Grade3_PARCC

Grade4_PARCC

Grade5_PARCC

Grade6_PARCC

Grade7_PARCC

Grade8_PARCC

Grade 3-8_PARCC

Grade11_SAT

ELs 18.2 17.7 3.8 1.9 3 2.3 11.4 1.4

Non-ELs 41.6 43.4 39.4 36.5 42.3 38.4 40.2 38.4

18.2 17.7

3.8 1.9 3 2.3

11.4

1.4

41.6 43.439.4

36.5

42.338.4 40.2 38.4

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

% M

eet

or

Exce

ed

2018 Reading (% Meet or Exceed): ELs vs. Non-ELs

ELs Non-ELs


EB on PARCC and SAT2018 EBs vs. Non-EBs on PARCC and SAT_ Math

2018 Math (% Meet or Exceed)

ELsNon-ELs



Grade 5_PARCC 5.1 34




Grade 3-8_PARCC

11.6 33.9

Grade 11_SAT 3.7 35.7

Grade3_PARCC

Grade4_PARCC

Grade5_PARCC

Grade6_PARCC

Grade7_PARCC

Grade8_PARCC

Grade 3-8_PARCC

Grade11_SAT

ELs 21.8 13.4 5.1 3.1 3.7 4.1 11.6 3.7

Non-ELs 41.8 35.8 34 28.8 32.6 32.2 33.9 35.7

21.8

13.4

5.1 3.1 3.7 4.1

11.6

3.7

41.8

35.8 3428.8

32.6 32.2 33.9 35.7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

% M

eet

or

Exce

ed

2018 Math (% Meet or Exceed):ELs vs. Non-ELs

ELs Non-ELs


Former EB on PARCC and SAT2018 Non EB vs. Former EBs on PARCC and SAT_ Reading

Grade3_PARCC

Grade4_PARCC

Grade5_PARCC

Grade6_PARCC

Grade7_PARCC

Grade8_PARCC

Grade 3-8_PARCC

Grade11_SAT

Non-ELs 41.6 43.4 39.4 36.5 42.3 38.4 40.2 38.4

Former ELs 78.86 75.68 41.33 31.19 38.37 32.37 49.63 22.91

41.6 43.439.4

36.542.3

38.4 40.2 38.4

78.8675.68

41.33

31.19

38.3732.37

49.63

22.91

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

% M

eet

or

Exce

ed

2018 Reading (% Meet or Exceed): Non-ELs vs. Former ELs

Non-ELs Former ELs

2018 Reading (% Meet or Exceed)

Non-ELs Former ELs







Grade 3-8_PARCC 40.2 49.63

Grade 11_SAT 38.4 22.91


Former EB on PARCC and SAT2018 Non-EB vs. Former EBs on PARCC and SAT_ Math

2018 Math (% Meet or Exceed)

Non-ELsFormer ELs



Grade 5_PARCC 34 38.36



Grade 8_PARCC 32.2 27.86Grade 3-8_PARCC 33.9 44.50

Grade 11_SAT 35.7 25.38

Grade3_PARCC

Grade4_PARCC

Grade5_PARCC

Grade6_PARCC

Grade7_PARCC

Grade8_PARCC

Grade 3-8_PARCC

Grade11_SAT

Non-ELs 41.8 35.8 34 28.8 32.6 32.2 33.9 35.7

Former ELs 80.02 65.64 38.36 26.31 28.82 27.86 44.50 25.38

41.835.8 34

28.832.6 32.2 33.9 35.7

80.02

65.64

38.36

26.31 28.82 27.86

44.50

25.38

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

% M

eet

or

Exce

ed

2018 Math (% Meet or Exceed): Non-ELs vs. Former ELs

Non-ELs Former ELs


Former ELs by Year on Academic Assessment

1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year

NotProficient 36% 71% 69% 65%

Proficient 64% 29% 31% 35%

36%

71% 69%65%64%

29% 31%35%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

% O

F M

EET

OR

EX

CEE

D

YEAR AFTER EXIT

2018 Former ELs_Reading

NotProficient Proficient


Former ELs by Year on Academic Assessment

1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year

NotProficient 42% 73% 74% 73%

Proficient 58% 27% 26% 27%

42%

73% 74% 73%

58%

27% 26% 27%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

% O

F M

EET

OR

EX

CEE

D

YEAR AFTER EXIT

2018 Former ELs_Math

NotProficient Proficient


Questions

THANK YOU!

emergent bilingual data and report in ilwhole child whole school whole community 12 2019 bilingual...

Documents