emergency response issues in sport- john boulay - csts march 2011

45
EMERGENCY RESPONSE ISSUES IN SPORT John Boulay B.Sc., CAT(C), EMT-P, D.O. (Q) Certified Athletic Therapist, Paramedic, Osteopath First Responder/EMR Instructor-Trainer OTTAWA March 25 th ,2011

Upload: kinemedics

Post on 25-Jun-2015

336 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


6 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

EMERGENCY RESPONSE ISSUES IN SPORT

John Boulay B.Sc., CAT(C), EMT-P, D.O.(Q)Certified Athletic Therapist, Paramedic, Osteopath

First Responder/EMR Instructor-Trainer

OTTAWA March 25th,2011

Page 2: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011
Page 3: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

EMERGENCY RESPONSE ISSUES IN SPORT

1. Remain current2. Level of training 3. Skill sets4. Airway management5. Sports equipment removal6. Away venue7. Home venue8. Mock-up / simulations

Page 4: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

1. REMAIN CURRENT• Practice and standards are always improving.• New approaches to old problems are being

developed.• Change in major standards every 5 years and

we just entered the transition period ILCOR, PHTLS etc.

Page 5: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

Primary Survey ILCOR OCTOBER 2010

UEMS/911 CABdDEFIB

Secondary Survey Head to toe / PMSCx 4 / Vital Signs

D E F G Disability (head / spine) Epidermis Fracture General

Page 6: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011
Page 7: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

Research in Emergency Response

• Research on decades old skills/myths in progress.

• New possibilities exist with advances in electronic monitoring. Movement that was difficult to measure in the past now possible.

• Training and knowledge of performance a useful future training tool for rescuers.

Page 8: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

Position Papers USA vs CANADA

• Standards vary and USA positions papers don’t always reflect the Canadian realities.

• For years it has been mentioned to keep the equipment on until arrival at the ER. Recently modified if “affects resuscitation efforts”

• Why wait until then to orderly remove the equipment on-site by trained personnel?

• Most ER trauma teams don’t have personnel with expertise in sports equipment extrication.

Page 9: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

2. LEVEL OF TRAINING• Since 2001 the basic standard has become First Responder (FR)• Most groups now employ some type of FR training and similar

skill sets.• SKILL SET include: CPR, AED, airway adjuncts, ventilation, O2 admin, suction, bleeding/wounds, fracture/spinal management, medical emergencies, anaphylaxis, etc.• FR now required: CAT(C): exam/games applications SPC, Sport Chiro, Sport Masso: membership• EMR: within 5 years may become the basic standard of care.

Page 10: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

Standards Consensus

• Pre-hospital consensus among groups, regions difficult

• Important to follow local guidelines and be aware of variances in other regions.• When a visitor, use local approach, as long as it is safe and is sports specific.• Need to know variations, what works and

what doesn’t.

Page 11: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011
Page 12: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

EMS vs Sports Med Intervention

• If time, training ,equipment and staff permit...don’t delay immobilization and packaging.

• Spinal transfer and immobilization is best performed by a skilled on-site sport med team than a pair of paramedics.

• MSK injuries are much better managed by skilled sport med team members than paramedics with little training in this area

• On-field responders should stay within comfort level with respect to training, available equipment and resources.

Page 13: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

3. SKILL SETS eg: SPINAL MANAGEMENT Head stabilization: Head Hold (head squeeze), Trap Hold (trap squeeze)Cervical Collar- sizing/application: supine, standing, seated, four-point Supine Emergency Log Roll - Emerg LR-1, Emerg LR-2 (vomit)Prone Emergency Log Roll - Emerg LR-1, Emerg LR-2 (no pulse/breathing)Supine Lift & Slide- technique of choice, better than log roll: L&S-8, L&S-6, L&S-4 Supine Log Roll - more movement than L&S, requires fewer rescuers: LR-5, LR-4, LR-2 Supine Straddle-Lift - applicable in tight spaces, uneven surfaces: SL-5, SL-4Prone Log Roll-rescuers on spine board lunge back & pull patient onto board: PR-4Standing Take Down-collar, patient brought down on board,2 rescuers,1 spotterSeated Take Down - collar first, patient brought down on board with 3-5 rescuers Four-Point Take Down - collar first, patient brought down with 3 rescuers 4-point lateral/roll, 4-point prone/rollStrapping: (PHTLS) Torso-2 straps cross, ASIS-1 strap horz., Mid-Femur-1 strap horz., Leg/feet-Fig. 8 (ITLS) Torso-2 straps cross, Pelvis-2 straps cross, Legs-1 strap horz. Repositioning on board: (PHTLS) lateral then vertical, (ITLS) V-slide

Page 14: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

8-Person LIFT - SUPINE

1 Responder at head, 6 persons at sides, 1 person at board (caudal)“1-2-3 Lift”(6 inches), “STOP”, “SLIDE BOARD”, “STOP”, “1-2-3 DOWN”

Page 15: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

Head Stabilization

• Head Hold (squeeze) VS. Trap Hold• A topic of discussion over past 25 years.• Head Hold: best hold during transfers• Trap Hold: best hold for agitated spinal victim

• Ref: New original research: Clin Jour Sport Med

Page 16: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

METHODS

Head Squeeze Trap Squeeze

Best hold duringTransfers and lifts

Best hold to stabilize Agitated victim

Causes less movementthan log roll, requires6-8 rescuers

Less effective thanL&S, can be performedby 2 rescuers (ambulance)

Page 17: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

4. AIRWAY MANAGEMENT• Head-Tilt Chin-lift (non-spinal)• Trauma Jaw thrust (spinal suspect)• Trauma Chin lift (temporary access, spinal suspect)

• Rescue Airway (King LT) for sports physicians• Provides definitive blind intubation in the field.• One of most important roles of sports med doc on the

field: provide/maintain definitive/patent airway.• Certain risk sports also need doc to be able to manage surgical airway.

Page 18: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

Airway management approach

• Clinical circumstances• Skill of responders• Physician/Available resources

• *As per CMPA, physicians role on the field of play is as a “FIRST RESPONDER”

Page 19: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

Extraglottic Rescue Airway Devices

• Supraglottic airway devices– LMA– ILMA

• Infraglottic airway devices– Combitube– King LT

Page 20: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

Supraglottic airway devices

LMA ILMA

Page 21: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011
Page 22: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

Infraglottic airway devices

Combitube placement King LT placement

Page 23: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

Combitube and King LT• Seal Larynx between esophageal and oropharynx balloon• Combitube has 2 pilot balloons; King LT has 1• Success rate: 98-100%

• Combitube not for children <4 feet tall• King LT comes in children sizes• No optimum protection against aspiration• OK to use in upper GI and upper airway hemorrhage, and in facial burns

KING LT IS “RESCUE” AIRWAY OF CHOICEFOR SPORT PHYSICIANS IN THE FIELD

Page 24: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

5. SPORTS EQUIPMENT REMOVAL

• Trained/rehearsed in extrication of equipment within 30 days of start of season.

• Equipment should be removed sooner than later depending on available resources.

• If only one trained rescuer, provide basic life support as required, consider removal upon

arrival of paramedic team

Page 25: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

The faceguard (facemask) should always be removed first for a suspected spinal.

Research has shown there is less movement of the head/neck during helmet removal when the facemask is removed first.

This is especially true with obese players (ie: linemen) because their helmets tend to fit

so tight (skin folds and fat fit all parts of the helmet).

Long face masks also present a challenge with pads still in place and helmet rotation needed to clear face is limited.

Page 26: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011
Page 27: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011
Page 28: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011
Page 29: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011
Page 30: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

6. AWAY VENUE• At mercy of local emergency response• eg: NHL practice venue model (since 2009) ensures a fully equipped trauma kit is available to

visiting teams for their practices.• eg: Francophone games in Madagascar, there was

no real EMS or host medical at venues. During the marathon, Canada ended covering for all teams along the route.

• Never rely exclusively on host medical to provide all of your needs.

Page 31: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

SIDEWALK HAZARDS IN THEATHLETE’S VILLAGER

COVERING THE MARATHON ROUTE

Page 32: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

OPENING CERMONIESOF THE GAMESINCLUDED RELEASE OF “ZEBU” INTO THE CROWD.

FRANCOPHONE GAMES Madagascar

Page 33: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

PART OF THE “GAMES MISSION”AND LEGACY WAS TO TRAINHOST MEDICAL IN EVENT COVERAGESKILLS.

CANADA ALSO LEFT BEHINDDEVELOPMENT-FUNDED MEDICAL EQUIPMENTINCLUDING OUR FOUR-WHEELDRIVE AMBULANCE WHICHWE HAD SHIPPED OVER.

Page 34: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011
Page 35: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

7. HOME VENUE• Many advantages of home based games

Example: Vancouver 2010• Globally excellent medical care and access.• But as in every games, some issues with Field of Play access.• There were also some issues with certain pre-hospital skills applied to field of

play.• A video entitled “Protect the cord” was being circulated as the skill set for the

2010 games. Unfortunately it was primarily aquatic based and not appropriate for winter games .

• There was also para-medical coverage and safety issues at the Whistler sliding center as far as a year prior the pre-opening ceremonies fatality.

• There is no blame intended, as this is mentioned to illustrate the challenges that are present at every event, even one as great as the 2010 games.

Page 36: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

MMUWorld Class Care

Page 37: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011
Page 38: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011
Page 39: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011
Page 40: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

8. MOCK-UP / SIMULATIONS

Page 41: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011
Page 42: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011
Page 43: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

Need to constantly strive to improve our preparation & enhance our interventions.

Page 44: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011
Page 45: Emergency response issues in sport- John Boulay - CSTS MArch 2011

KEEP THEM SAFE!