elke leuridan, md, phd center for the evaluation of ... for the evaluation of vaccination vaccine...
TRANSCRIPT
Maternal immunisation
Elke Leuridan, MD, PhD
Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination
Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute
Outline of the talk
1.General introduction
2. Pertussis vaccination in pregnancy
a) Safety
b) Immunogenicity
c) Interference/blunting
d) Effectiveness
3. Influenza vaccination in pregnancy
a) Safety
b) Effectiveness
4. Conclusion
1. General introduction
Vaccination during pregnancy: triple goal
• Protection of the pregnant woman (influenza)
• Protection of the foetus (influenza, CMV)
• Protection of the newborn (tetanus, pertussis, influenza, GBS, RSV)
• Newborns have an increased susceptibility to infectiousdiseases
• Augmenting the amount of maternal antibodiestransported towards the foetus
3
Advantages of vaccination usually outweigh the potential risk of a side effect.
Every woman should start a pregnancy in a perfectly protectedstatus: pre-conceptional consult (food- folic acid- vaccinationstatus- serological status- irregular antibodies…)
Vaccines containing inactivated material do not appear to beharmful to foetus or pregnant women. Attenuated vaccines are contra-indicated in pregnant women(1 mo anticonception in fertile aged women)
A few general rules
1. Maternal titer• Time since contact
vaccine/pathogen• Vaccination versus
disease• Dilution blood
volume in pregnancy
2. Placenta: • FcRn receptor• Disease of the
placenta
Faucette A N et al. Hum. Reprod. Update
3. Gestational age• Placental function
Malek 1996
Determinants of the amount of maternal antibodies in infants
Infants: 3 doses at 8-12-16 weeks + booster dose at 15 months(aP)
Children: 1 dose at 4-6 years (aP)
Adolescents: 1 dose at 14-16 years (since 2009) (aP)
Adults: 1 dose dTpa:
• For adults who did not receive the booster at 14-16 years
• Pregnant women every pregnancy between 24-32 weeks of gestation (since 2013)
• Adults in regular contact with infants (< 12 months)
Future parents
Grandparents
Personel in nurseries
Heatlh care personel
HGR-CSS: Belgium pertussis vaccination policy
10
National Reference Laboratory forPertussis
General introduction
Source: https://www.wiv-isp.be/pedisurv/AnnualReports/CurrentReport/jaarverslag_nl.pdf
UK: - N= 17.560 women: FU until 28 days post
vaccination- N= 6.185 women: FU until 44 weeks post-last
day menstruation- Risk assessment: stillbirth, maternal or
neonatal death, (pre-) eclampsia, haemorrhage, fetal distress, uterine rupture, placenta (vasa) praevia, C section, low birthweight, neonatal kidney failure, other severe diseases Donegan BMJ 2014
Safety
US, 2 California VSD sites (Tdap): Kharbanda Jama 2014
- Risk assessment: sga, prematurity, hypertensive disorders, chorioamnionitis
- N= 123.494 women- RR chorioamnionitis 1.19- 50% confirmed after revision of charts; no preterm birth association
VAERS chorioamnionitis (Tdap): Datwani Vaccine 2015
- Chorioamnionitis was found to be uncommonly reported, representing 1% (N=31) of pregnancy reports to VAERS
- No clear risk factor
Review (general): - No evidence for increased risk- Benefit> risk- Importance of background incidence rates- Surveillance necessary
Keller Stanlowski Vaccine 2014
Maertens & Leuridan et al, accepted, Vaccine 2016
Prospective study
Vaccine group (Boostrix): N= 57 women, 55 infants
Control group (no vaccine): N=42 women, 26 infants
Infants received Infanrix hexa
Interference/ blunting by maternal antibodies
15
- Blunting by high titers of maternal antibodies for tetanus and pneumococcal responses, yet not for aP responses (p0.14) (Jones et al Vaccine 2014)
- Interference of maternal antibodies has been described with infant immune responses to wP vaccines (Sako W TW Jama 1945; Provenzano NEJM 1965; Englund JA, Pediatrics 1995)
Pre- iMap: at 2 months before primary immunisationPost-iMap: at 5 months (one month after primary immunisation)Post P13-UK: at 5 months for historical cohort of infants whose mothers did not receive pertussis vaccine in pregnancyIMAP cohort: N= 141 infantsHistorical control: N= 203 infants
Ladhani et al CID 2015
Conclusion: high pre-immunization antibody concentrations, but blunting of subsequentresponses to pertussis toxinEffect on other components of infant vaccination schedule- CRM conjugated vaccines: less good
responses- MCC-TT and Hib-TT enhanced response
Study UK: prospective, historically controlled
19
0,00
20,00
40,00
60,00
80,00
100,00
120,00
Pregnancy 1 monthpostvacc
At delivery Cord Prevacc Postvacc Preboost Postboost
An
ti-P
T an
tib
od
y ti
ter
(IU
/mL)
Anti-PT antibodies
PT Vaccine group
PT Control group
0,00
50,00
100,00
150,00
200,00
250,00
Pregnancy 1 monthpostvacc
At delivery Cord Prevacc Postvacc Preboost Postboost
An
ti-F
HA
an
tib
od
y ti
ter
(IU
/mL)
Anti-FHA antibodies
FHA Vaccine group
FHA Control group
0,00
100,00
200,00
300,00
400,00
500,00
600,00
700,00
800,00
Pregnancy 1 monthpostvacc
At delivery Cord Prevacc Postvacc Preboost Postboost
An
ti-P
rn a
nti
bo
dy
tite
r (I
U/m
L)
Anti-Prn antibodies
Prn Vaccine group
Prn Control group
Light colour: Vaccine group
Dark colour: Control group
Star mark: Statistically significant
Maertens et al. Vaccine. Accepted for publication.
20
0,00
0,50
1,00
1,50
2,00
2,50
3,00
3,50
4,00
4,50
Pregnancy 1 monthpostvacc
At delivery Cord Prevacc Postvacc Preboost PostboostAn
ti-T
T an
tib
od
y ti
ter
(IU
/mL)
Anti-TT antibodies
TT Vaccine group
TT Control group
0,00
0,50
1,00
1,50
2,00
2,50
3,00
3,50
4,00
4,50
Pregnancy 1 monthpostvacc
At delivery Cord Prevacc Postvacc Preboost PostboostAn
ti-D
T an
tib
od
y ti
ter
(IU
/mL)
Anti-DT antibodies
DT Vaccine group
DT Control group
Light colour: Vaccine group
Dark colour: Control group
Star mark: Statistically significant
Maertens et al. Vaccine. Accepted for publication.
http://www.who.int/immunization/sage/meetings/2014/april/3_SAGE_April_Pertussis_Miller_Strategies.pdf?ua=1
Effectiveness on hospitalisation, caused by pertussis disease among young infants
Amirthalingam et al Lancet 2015
Groep 1: personen met risico voor complicaties, d.w.z.:
1. zwangere vrouwen die in het tweede of derde trimester van hun
zwangerschap zijn op het ogenblik van het griepseizoen. Zij worden gevaccineerd
vanaf het tweede trimester van de zwangerschap
2. alle patiënten vanaf de leeftijd van 6 maanden die lijden aan een
onderliggende chronische aandoening, ook indien gestabiliseerd, van de longen
(inclusief ernstig astma), het hart (uitgezonderd hypertensie), de lever, de nieren,
aan metabole aandoeningen (inclusief diabetes), aan neuromusculaire
aandoeningen of aan immuniteitsstoornissen (natuurlijk of geïnduceerd)
3. alle personen vanaf 65 jaar
4. alle personen die in een instelling opgenomen zijn
5. kinderen tussen 6 maanden en 18 jaar die een langdurige aspirinetherapie
ondergaan.
Groep 2: alle personen werkzaam in de gezondheidssector
Groep 3: personen die onder hetzelfde dak wonen als
1.de risicopersonen van groep 1
2.kinderen jonger dan 6 maanden.
Reasons for vaccination: - Higher susceptibility for influenza (Th1-Th2 shift And
physionomic: higher diaphragm, faster breathing frequencyand more superficial respiration)
- Pandemic flu: higher risk for hospitalisation on ICU, mechanical ventilation and mortality (up to 26% of allhospitalisations on ICU) (Siston JAMA 2010; Knight BJOG 2011)
- Postpartal still higher risk for severe disease (Mertz BMJ 2013)
- Congenital anomalies and IUGR, prematurity, missedabortions, stillbirths, spina bifida, split lip, limb reduction
Timing:- in USA all trimesters,
in BE only 2e/ 3e trimester- H1N1 study CH: N=188, at least 14 days before delivery(Blanchard Rohner PIDJ 2013)(Dubar PLoS One. 2010 )
- All considered safe except for the live attenuated vaccines
- Adjuvanted pandemic A/H1N1 2009 influenza vaccine: Denmark: N=54.585 pregnancies, no increased risk on fetal death, spontaneousabortion, stillbirth (Pasternak BMJ 2012)
- Seasonal vaccine: meta analysis: no increased risk on fetal death, spontaneous abortion, congenital malformation, but first trimester data are lacking (McMillan Vaccine 2015)
Safety
EffectivenessPregnant women:
- Bangladesh: 36% drop in respiratory infections (Zaman New Engl J
Med 2008)
- S Africa: 50% effectiveness against influenza , less in hiv + (Mahdi NEJM 2014)
- US: 50% reduction respiratory infections among vaccinatedpregnant women (Thompson CID 2013)
Foetus: positive effect on SGA and prematurity, more benefit for higherrisk profile (african american and lower SE situation) (Omer Saad Plos Medicine
2011) (Adedinsewo Vaccine 2013)
Neonate:
positive effect: protection from disease(Zaman N Engl J Med. 2008) (Eick Arch Ped Adolesc Med 2011) (benowitz CID 2010) (Galvao, ISRN Prev Med2013)
Overview: vaccinate safely?
Polio YES Haemophilus YES
Rubella Contraindicated Hepatitis YES
Measles Contraindicated Pneumococcus YES
Mumps Contraindicated Yellow fever Contraindicated
Tetanus/d YES Pertussis YES
Influenza YES Varicella Contraindicated
And more vaccines…
Rabies YES 100% lethal infection, vaccinate if necessary
Tick Borne Encephalitis
YES Seasonality: high risk in Eastern Europe
Japaneseencephalitis
YES Prevention mosquitos!
Meningococcus YES Seasonality! Men-afrivac recommendation in meningitis belt (WER 2011 jan)
Cholera Yes/No 50% immunogenicity, no obligation to immunize
TBC Yes/No Skintest/RX. Treatment treats fœtus!
Small pox No malformations
Anthrax No data
- No vaccine has ever been proven to have embryotoxic or teratogeniceffects
- Theoretically avoid live attenuated vaccine in pregnancy
- Accidental exposure to attenuated vaccines: no indication fordiscontinuation
- Adequate humoral immune response during pregnancy
- Active transplacental transport of maternal antibodies
- Pertussis vaccination during pregnancy
- offers increased antibody titers at birth which last at least until the infant’s first vaccination, thus closing the susceptibility gap
- minor blunting is noticed after infant vaccination
- Influenza vaccination increases the protection against ILI in pregnant women and has a positive effect on the infants’ protection
Take home messages