elk run interchange design-build project s.p. 2505- 48 (th 52) elk run interchange design-build...
TRANSCRIPT
Elk Run Interchange Elk Run Interchange Design-Build ProjectDesign-Build ProjectS.P. 2505- 48 (TH 52)S.P. 2505- 48 (TH 52)
PROJECT INFORMATIONAL MEETING
March 26, 2010
INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION
Terry Ward, Mn/DOT District 6Terry Ward, Mn/DOT District 6
Mn/DOT Project ManagerMn/DOT Project Manager
DISCLAIMERDISCLAIMER
What is discussed today is informational only, meant What is discussed today is informational only, meant to assist interested teams in the pursuit of this project.to assist interested teams in the pursuit of this project.
The ultimate contract requirements will be included in The ultimate contract requirements will be included in the Request for Proposals (RFP). the Request for Proposals (RFP).
There may be changes between now and the time the There may be changes between now and the time the RFP is issued.RFP is issued.
Project PartnersProject Partners
City of Pine IslandCity of Pine Island WSNWSN
Olmsted CountyOlmsted County
Goodhue CountyGoodhue County
Federal Highway AdministrationFederal Highway Administration
Design-Build ProposersDesign-Build Proposers
HNTB HNTB –– Design-Build Contract Development Design-Build Contract Development
SRF SRF Preliminary Geometric LayoutsPreliminary Geometric Layouts Environmental DocumentsEnvironmental Documents
Tower Investments, LLCTower Investments, LLC
Other firms listed in RFQOther firms listed in RFQ
AgendaAgenda
Previous RFQ / SOQ ProcurementPrevious RFQ / SOQ ProcurementProject BackgroundProject BackgroundDesign-Build ProcurementDesign-Build ProcurementDesign-Build ActivityDesign-Build ActivityQuestionsQuestions
•
Cancelled Procurement Letter on DB WebsiteCancelled Procurement Letter on DB Website
SOQ’s are confidential until project awardSOQ’s are confidential until project award
SOQ evaluation materials are confidential until project SOQ evaluation materials are confidential until project awardaward
SOQ’s will not be returned to contractors until after SOQ’s will not be returned to contractors until after awardaward
Previous RFQ / SOQ Procurement
Elk Run Interchange ProjectElk Run Interchange Project Background Background
Trunk Highway 52 Freeway PartnershipTrunk Highway 52 Freeway Partnership
Project LocationProject Location
EA Preferred Alternative - 2003EA Preferred Alternative - 2003
Elk Run AUARElk Run AUAR
Elk Run AUARElk Run AUAR
Full Build-Out – 5,157 AcresFull Build-Out – 5,157 Acres
Residential – 3,860 acresResidential – 3,860 acresCommercial – 680 acresCommercial – 680 acresBioScience – 208 acresBioScience – 208 acresInstitutional – 410Institutional – 410Park and ROW – included in ResidentialPark and ROW – included in Residential
Elk Run Project Location
Elk Run BackgroundElk Run Background
Elk Run Concept
Elk Run Land Use
EA UpdateEA Update
Phase I - Preferred Option - OldPhase I - Preferred Option - Old
Elk Run Interchange ProjectElk Run Interchange Project Layouts Layouts
City of Pine IslandCity of Pine Island
Abraham Algadi, City Administrator Abraham Algadi, City Administrator
Project IssuesProject Issues Development IssuesDevelopment Issues
Elk Run Interchange ProjectElk Run Interchange Project Design Build Procurement Design Build Procurement
BackgroundBackground
http://www.dot.state.mn.us/designbuild/
Information for BiddersInformation for Bidders
http://www.dot.state.mn.us/designbuild/elkrun/index.html
Information for BiddersInformation for Bidders
Project Informational Meeting PresentationProject Informational Meeting Presentation
Preliminary Geometric LayoutPreliminary Geometric Layout
Utilities LayoutUtilities Layout
Value Engineering StudyValue Engineering Study
Tower Right-of-Way MapTower Right-of-Way Map
Bridge 97287 Design FilesBridge 97287 Design Files
Soil Boring informationSoil Boring information
Public MeetingsPublic Meetings
Initial RFQ materials – Addendums etc.Initial RFQ materials – Addendums etc.
BackgroundBackground
Conflict of InterestConflict of Interest
Conflict of InterestConflict of Interest
Letters of Interest (LOI) ReceivedLetters of Interest (LOI) Received
Alliant Engineering, Inc.Alliant Engineering, Inc.C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc.C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc.Duininck IncorporatedDuininck IncorporatedEdward Kraemer & Sons, Inc.Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc.Hoffman Construction Co.Hoffman Construction Co.JacobsJacobsLunda Construction CompanyLunda Construction CompanyMathiowetz Construction CompanyMathiowetz Construction CompanyMinnowa Construction, Inc.Minnowa Construction, Inc.PBS&JPBS&JPierce Pini & Associates, Inc.Pierce Pini & Associates, Inc.
Letters of Interest (LOI) ReceivedLetters of Interest (LOI) ReceivedReilly Construction Co., Inc.Reilly Construction Co., Inc.RLK IncorporatedRLK IncorporatedRochester Sand & GravelRochester Sand & GravelSEHSEHShafer Contracting Co., Inc.Shafer Contracting Co., Inc.Stanley Consultants, Inc.Stanley Consultants, Inc.TKDATKDAUlland Bros., inc.Ulland Bros., inc.URSURSValley Paving incorporatedValley Paving incorporatedWestwoodWestwoodWSNWSNYaggy Colby AssociatesYaggy Colby Associates
ScheduleScheduleTentative Tentative –– Subject to Change Subject to Change
ACTIVITY Due DateACTIVITY Due Date
Issue RFQ March 17, 2010Issue RFQ March 17, 2010
SOQ Due Date April 9, 2010 SOQ Due Date April 9, 2010
Determine Short List April 23, 2010Determine Short List April 23, 2010
Issue RFP April 29, 2010Issue RFP April 29, 2010
Project Letting July 30, 2010Project Letting July 30, 2010
ScheduleScheduleTentative Tentative –– Subject to Change Subject to Change
Design-Build Best-ValueDesign-Build Best-Value
Request for Qualifications (RFQ)Request for Qualifications (RFQ)Short-listingShort-listingRequest for Proposals (RFP)Request for Proposals (RFP)
Technical ProposalTechnical Proposal
POSSIBLE CRITERIA:POSSIBLE CRITERIA: QualityQuality SafetySafety Innovation – Roadway Geometric DesignInnovation – Roadway Geometric Design Schedule IntegrationSchedule Integration Public RelationsPublic Relations
Alternate Technical ConceptsAlternate Technical Concepts
Price ProposalPrice Proposal
Request for QualificationsRequest for QualificationsIssued March 17, 2010Issued March 17, 2010
Project Goals:Project Goals:1.1. Design and Construct a Quality product.Design and Construct a Quality product.
2.2. Increase Long Term Performance using Quality Increase Long Term Performance using Quality Materials and Construction Methods.Materials and Construction Methods.
3.3. Design and Construct a Safe project.Design and Construct a Safe project.
4.4. Maximize the roadway geometric design via Maximize the roadway geometric design via Innovation for cost effectiveness and efficiency.Innovation for cost effectiveness and efficiency.
5.5. Integrate Interchange project schedule with Integrate Interchange project schedule with development schedule.development schedule.
6.6. Public RelationsPublic Relations
Request for QualificationsRequest for Qualifications
Added Olmsted CSAH 12 RealignmentAdded Olmsted CSAH 12 Realignment
RFP Stipend RFP Stipend –– $150,000 $150,000
Page limit increased from 15 to 17Page limit increased from 15 to 17
Electronic SOQ SubmittalElectronic SOQ Submittal
Modified some Key PersonnelModified some Key Personnel
ScoringScoring
100 pt. scale100 pt. scale
Request for QualificationsRequest for Qualifications
Estimated Cost $35 - $40 millionEstimated Cost $35 - $40 million
Maximum Price Cap - $40 millionMaximum Price Cap - $40 million
Mn/DOT Single Point of ContactMn/DOT Single Point of Contact [email protected]
Elk Run Interchange ProjectElk Run Interchange Project Design Build Activity Design Build Activity
StatusStatus
FundingFunding
Right of Way Right of Way Tower ROWTower ROW Olmsted County PropertyOlmsted County Property Other ParcelsOther Parcels
GeotechnicalGeotechnical
UtilitiesUtilities
Roadway Geometric LayoutRoadway Geometric Layout
EA UpdateEA Update
Municipal ConsentMunicipal Consent
Tower Development ROW
Design-Build Design-Build General Discussion PointsGeneral Discussion Points
Staged Approach to DeliveryStaged Approach to Delivery All construction completed by 2012.All construction completed by 2012.
Co-Housing – probably not.Co-Housing – probably not. Teams need to think about communications and Teams need to think about communications and
issue resolution. May required Design-Builder to issue resolution. May required Design-Builder to co-locate during Design Phase co-locate during Design Phase
Roadway Design FlexibilityRoadway Design Flexibility
RoundaboutsRoundabouts
New Elk Run Interchange LocationNew Elk Run Interchange Location
New Interchange Location – looking NB
Proposer Project Site AccessProposer Project Site Access
Contact: Terry WardContact: Terry Ward
May need a Mn/DOT Permit May need a Mn/DOT Permit
Handouts Handouts
Questions ?Questions ?