elizabeth godfrey 1. periodic assessment of results appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency,...

17
Evaluating the success and sustainability of curriculum and pedagogical innovation Elizabeth Godfrey 1

Upload: kory-mcdaniel

Post on 29-Dec-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended

Evaluating the success and sustainability of curriculum and

pedagogical innovation

Elizabeth Godfrey

1

Page 2: Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended

Periodic assessment of results• Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability

Identifies intended and unintended effects Identifies what worked and what didn’t Provides level of judgement about the overall worth of

intervention Key to project improvement Influence decision-making or policy formulation through

the provision of empirically-driven feedback sustainability

Evaluation – gathering of information to understand and make judgements about the project and its outcomes

Page 3: Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended

What is the purpose and scope of the evaluation?

Why is the evaluation being done? How will the information be used? What evaluation form and approach will be most

suitable for this study?

Formative – monitoring progress to improve approaches

Summative – overall perspective – focus on value or worth of project and designed for accountability or continuation purposes

Page 4: Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended

4

Page 5: Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended

Evaluation and assessment have many meanings…one definition:

• Assessment - is gathering evidence

• Evaluation - is interpreting data and making value judgements

Examples of assessment and evaluation• Individual’s performance (grading)

• Program’s effectiveness (accreditation)

• Project’s progress and success (monitoring and validating)

Evaluation and Assessment

Page 6: Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended

Effective evaluation starts with carefully defined project

goals and expected outcomes Goals provide overarching statements of project intention

• What is your overall ambition? • What do you hope to achieve?

Expected outcomes identify specific observable results for each goal

• How will achieving your “intention” reflect changes in student behavior?

• How will it change their learning and their attitudes?

Evaluation and Project Goals/Outcomes

Page 7: Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended

Goals → Expected outcomes → Evaluation questions

Questions form the basis of the evaluation process

Evaluation process collects and interprets data to answer evaluation questions

Goals, Expected Outcomes, and Evaluation Questions

Page 8: Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended

To what extent has the project been implemented as planned? How well has the project been co-ordinated across different institutions? To what extent have the intended outcomes been achieved? Were there any unintended outcomes? How well have the needs of staff been met? To what extent have the intended student learning outcomes been achieved? What measures if any have been put in place to promote sustainability of the

project’s focus and outcomes? Are students better able to describe the effects of changing some feature in a simple

problem as a result of the intervention? What lessons have been learned from this project and how might these be of

assistance to other institutions?

Evaluation Questions like…

Page 9: Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended

How will the information be collected, analysed and presented?

What type of data is most appropriate?

What are the most appropriate methods of data collection?

How will data be analysed and presented?

What ethical issues are involved in the evaluation?

Page 10: Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended

Surveys • Forced choice or open-ended responses

Observations• Actually monitor and evaluate behavior

Interviews• Structured (fixed questions) or in-depth (free flowing)

Concept Inventories• Multiple-choice questions to measure conceptual understanding

Rubrics for analyzing student products• Guides for scoring student reports, test, etc.

Focus groups• Similar to interviews but with group interaction

Examples of Tools for Evaluating Learning Outcomes 

Page 11: Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended

An Intelligent Tutoring System for Engineering Mechanics Tanja Mitrovic, Charles Fleischmann, Brent Martin, Pramudi Suraweera

The planned evaluation will focus on the following questions: Is the developed ITS effective? Does it support learning better than the traditional approach? Does the system increase students motivation? �We will compare performances of two groups of students. One group will

learn the material in the traditional way, via lectures and tutorials. The other group will attend lectures, but the tutorials would be replaced by interaction with the system. Time will be controlled. We will require students to sit pre- and post-tests, to measure their knowledge. We will also collect data about their actions while solving problems, and analyze the data.

A NZ exemplar

Page 12: Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended

Judgements will be required for each key evaluation question

Need to develop indicators or targets - standards and levels regarded as acceptable

Could use benchmarks – location or source of best practice for comparison

What are the criteria for making judgements about the project and its outcomes?

Page 13: Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended

Who?

key question underpinning the budget

Should it be an individual or a team? Insiders or outsiders? Skills – qualitative and/or quantitative Prepare an evaluation brief or terms of reference When to involve the evaluator?

What resources and skills are required to conduct the evaluation?

Page 14: Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended

NSF’s User Friendly Handbook for Project Evaluation http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2002/nsf02057/start.htm

Australian Learning and Teaching Council Grants Scheme – Evaluating Projectshttp://www.altc.edu.au/extras/altc-gsep/evaluation_plan.pdf

Student Assessment of Their Learning Gains (SALG)http://www.salgsite.org/

Other Sources

Page 15: Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended

Think about evaluation, purpose and scope from the beginning of the project

Ensure appropriate data is collected eg pre/post intervention

Evaluation provides supporting evidence to influence decision-making or policy formulation through the provision of empirically-driven feedback sustainability

Summary

Page 16: Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended

Questions…

Page 17: Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended

Thank you

Elizabeth GodfreyEngineering Education Research and Project Management

[email protected]