electron cloud in final doublet ireng07) ilc interaction region engineering design workshop...

16
Electron cloud in Electron cloud in Final Doublet Final Doublet ILC Interaction Region Engineering Design Workshop ( IRENG07) IRENG07) September 17-21, 2007, SLAC Lanfa Wang

Upload: margaretmargaret-preston

Post on 18-Jan-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 Use 2005 field maps for SiD and GLD and older TESLA field for LDC  Use 14mrad total crossing angle, L*=3.51m for SiD detector and L*=4.51m for GLD and LDC  Use same FD structure, with FD quads and sextupoles rematched SiD field and FD with L*=3.5m GLD field and FD with L*=4.5m LDC field and FD with L*=4.5m Solenoid field in QD0 Bz Br Constant solenoid field was used

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Electron cloud in Final Doublet IRENG07) ILC Interaction Region Engineering Design Workshop (IRENG07) September 17-21, 2007, SLAC Lanfa Wang

Electron cloud in Final DoubletElectron cloud in Final DoubletILC Interaction Region Engineering Design

Workshop (IRENG07)IRENG07)

September 17-21, 2007, SLAC

Lanfa Wang

Page 2: Electron cloud in Final Doublet IRENG07) ILC Interaction Region Engineering Design Workshop (IRENG07) September 17-21, 2007, SLAC Lanfa Wang

to be prototypedduring EDR

MotivationMotivationIn 14mrad crossing angle (baseline), the two beams are separated at Final Doublet (SC) where electron cloud is one concern.

Quadrupole field can trap electrons by mirror field trapping; There are also strong solenoid field in QD0 which also may confine electrons.

QD0: G=140T/m

QF1: G=80T/m

Radius=10 mm

Page 3: Electron cloud in Final Doublet IRENG07) ILC Interaction Region Engineering Design Workshop (IRENG07) September 17-21, 2007, SLAC Lanfa Wang

Use 2005 field maps for SiD and GLD Use 2005 field maps for SiD and GLD and older TESLA field for LDCand older TESLA field for LDC

Use 14mrad total crossing angle, Use 14mrad total crossing angle, L*=3.51m for SiD detector and L*=3.51m for SiD detector and L*=4.51m for GLD and LDCL*=4.51m for GLD and LDC

Use same FD structure, with FD Use same FD structure, with FD quads and sextupoles rematchedquads and sextupoles rematched

SiD field and FD with L*=3.5m

GLD field and FD with L*=4.5m

LDC field and FD with L*=4.5m

Solenoid field in QD0Solenoid field in QD0

Bz

Br

Constant solenoid field was used

Page 4: Electron cloud in Final Doublet IRENG07) ILC Interaction Region Engineering Design Workshop (IRENG07) September 17-21, 2007, SLAC Lanfa Wang

Program & ModelProgram & Model

3D space charge solver (FEM)3D space charge solver (FEM) Various Magnetic and electric field

Beam field

Clearing electrode, Solenoid, Grooved chamber, Applied to various accelerators: SNS, PSR, KEKB,RHIC,

ILC DR…

CLOUDLAND: 3D PIC code for e-cloud

General 3-dimensional fields given by expression.Fields can also be import from other program using tableField solver for electrode, solenoid, etc Gaussian bunch in round chamber ( image charge is included) PIC method for general geometry

Page 5: Electron cloud in Final Doublet IRENG07) ILC Interaction Region Engineering Design Workshop (IRENG07) September 17-21, 2007, SLAC Lanfa Wang

Trapping phenomenon---in quadrupole Trapping phenomenon---in quadrupole magnetmagnet

Orbit of a trapped photoelectron in normal Orbit of a trapped photoelectron in normal quadrupole magnet during the quadrupole magnet during the train gaptrain gap (field gradient=0.5T/m)

3D orbit 2D orbit Field lines

Page 6: Electron cloud in Final Doublet IRENG07) ILC Interaction Region Engineering Design Workshop (IRENG07) September 17-21, 2007, SLAC Lanfa Wang

Turning points

Beam E-fieldPositron bunch

Trapping mechanism (2)Trapping mechanism (2) –– Short bunchShort bunch

Becm

l12

constBm m 2||2

1

Invariation value of motion

Trapping conditionReflective Points: ||=0

0

max20||

20

20

BB

FF

Btrap

1trap

tconsmmmW tan222

22||

2

Trap factor is constant if Trap factor is constant if no other no other forceforce (except B force) disturbs the (except B force) disturbs the electron and smaller than 1.0, electron and smaller than 1.0, no no trappingtrapping

1tanint

20||

20

20

tconspo

emissiontheattrap

mirror field mirror field trappingtrapping

Trap requirement for positron bunch Bunch length should be shorter than period of gyration motion

(a) 4mm (b) 4cm

)(/7.10)( TBmml

ILC bunch (300m) is short enough for trapping!

Trapped electrons in Quad k=10.3T/m (KEKB beam)

Page 7: Electron cloud in Final Doublet IRENG07) ILC Interaction Region Engineering Design Workshop (IRENG07) September 17-21, 2007, SLAC Lanfa Wang

Trapping mechanism (3) Trapping mechanism (3) –– resonance (bunch resonance (bunch spacing)spacing)

Distribution of period of the trapped electron cloud in quadrupole of KEKB LER during the train gap for 4mm bunch length

Bunch spacing=8ns Bunch spacing=12ns

~16ns ~24ns

Resonance of the interaction between e-cloud and positron bunch: Bunch spacing = 1/2 of the period of electron longitudinal motion ILC has very long bunch spacing 175ns, The probably of resonance is small.

Page 8: Electron cloud in Final Doublet IRENG07) ILC Interaction Region Engineering Design Workshop (IRENG07) September 17-21, 2007, SLAC Lanfa Wang

E-cloud in SuperB QuadrupoleE-cloud in SuperB Quadrupole

At end of bunch train At bunch gap (20 bunch spacing/40ns after the last bunch in the train)

Trapped electrons

Multipacting

(H. Fukuma)

Page 9: Electron cloud in Final Doublet IRENG07) ILC Interaction Region Engineering Design Workshop (IRENG07) September 17-21, 2007, SLAC Lanfa Wang

Electron seed (I): from surface of Electron seed (I): from surface of beam pipe (QD0)beam pipe (QD0)

Photon electron; Beam loss; etcPhoton electron; Beam loss; etc Large Peak secondaryLarge Peak secondary emission emission

yield =yield =2.02.0 Quad filed +Constant solenoid Quad filed +Constant solenoid

field (0.2T/1T) is used in QD0field (0.2T/1T) is used in QD0 Large initial electron seedLarge initial electron seed: : number electron per meter per e+ number electron per meter per e+

= 2.40E-3= 2.40E-3 Bunch length 300Bunch length 300mm Beam size 639nm/5.7nmBeam size 639nm/5.7nm Bunch intensity 2Bunch intensity 210101010

There is no multipacting due to There is no multipacting due to the long bunch spacingthe long bunch spacingThere is no trapping;There is no trapping;

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 900010

9

1010

1011

1012

Time (ns) e (m

-3)

Average densityCenter density

Electron cloud build-up in QD0

Results

Simulation Parameters

Page 10: Electron cloud in Final Doublet IRENG07) ILC Interaction Region Engineering Design Workshop (IRENG07) September 17-21, 2007, SLAC Lanfa Wang

Electron Distribution & OrbitElectron Distribution & Orbit

-620-600

-580

-100

102

4

6

8

Z (mm)

3D orbit of electron

X (mm)

Y (

mm

)

-10 0 10-10

-5

0

5

10

X (mm)

Y (

mm

)

-5 0 5-600

-595

-590

X (mm)

Z (

mm

)

-610 -600 -590 -5803

4

5

6

7

8

Z (mm)

Y (

mm

)

Energy gain 22eV;

Speed of 5eV electron=1e6m/s

Drift distance during one bunch spacing 175ns=230mm

Electron distribution in transverse plane

Electron orbit

Page 11: Electron cloud in Final Doublet IRENG07) ILC Interaction Region Engineering Design Workshop (IRENG07) September 17-21, 2007, SLAC Lanfa Wang

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 50000

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9x 107

Time (ns)

e (m

-3)

Average densityCenter density

Electron seed (II): IonizationElectron seed (II): Ionization

Peak SEY 2.0Peak SEY 2.0 Constant solenoid field 0.2/1TConstant solenoid field 0.2/1T 1nTorr Pressure1nTorr Pressure Cross section of ionization 2 Cross section of ionization 2

Mbarn Mbarn

0 0.5 1 1.5 2x 10

4

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3x 10

7

Time (ns)

e (m

-3) Average density

Center density

Electron cloud build-up in QD0

No multipactingNo multipacting Short time trappingShort time trapping;;The accumulated electron The accumulated electron density is smalldensity is small

Simulation Parameters

Results

Bz=0.2T

Bz=1T

Page 12: Electron cloud in Final Doublet IRENG07) ILC Interaction Region Engineering Design Workshop (IRENG07) September 17-21, 2007, SLAC Lanfa Wang

Orbit of Trapped electron (QD0)Orbit of Trapped electron (QD0)

Electron’s orbit in QD0 +1T Solenoid

Page 13: Electron cloud in Final Doublet IRENG07) ILC Interaction Region Engineering Design Workshop (IRENG07) September 17-21, 2007, SLAC Lanfa Wang

Escape from trapping (QD0)Escape from trapping (QD0)

Electron distributionElectron orbit

Page 14: Electron cloud in Final Doublet IRENG07) ILC Interaction Region Engineering Design Workshop (IRENG07) September 17-21, 2007, SLAC Lanfa Wang

Electron in QF1 Electron in QF1

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3x 10

4

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7x 10

6

Time (ns)

e (m-3

)

Average densityCenter density

Electron cloud build-up in QF1

Peak SEY 2.0Peak SEY 2.0 1nTorr Pressure1nTorr Pressure Cross section of ionization 2 Cross section of ionization 2

Mbarn Mbarn

No multipactingNo multipacting No trappingNo trapping;;The accumulated electron The accumulated electron density is VERY smalldensity is VERY small

Results

Simulation Parameters

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5x 104

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8x 10

10

Time (ns)

e (m-3

)

Average densityCenter density

seed: Ionizationseed: Ionization

seed: surfaceseed: surface

Page 15: Electron cloud in Final Doublet IRENG07) ILC Interaction Region Engineering Design Workshop (IRENG07) September 17-21, 2007, SLAC Lanfa Wang

SummarySummary

The e-cloud in FD is simulated with 3D The e-cloud in FD is simulated with 3D modelmodel

No multipacting due to long bunch spacingNo multipacting due to long bunch spacing No Mirror field trapping due to long bunch No Mirror field trapping due to long bunch

spacingspacing Some Trapped electrons in QD0 by the Some Trapped electrons in QD0 by the

solenoid, but the electron density is smallsolenoid, but the electron density is small (To model realistic solenoid field?)(To model realistic solenoid field?)

Page 16: Electron cloud in Final Doublet IRENG07) ILC Interaction Region Engineering Design Workshop (IRENG07) September 17-21, 2007, SLAC Lanfa Wang

Acknowledgements Acknowledgements

Thanks to A. Seryi, M. Pivi and M. WoodleyThanks to A. Seryi, M. Pivi and M. Woodley