electromagnetic shearing of ultra high strength steels
TRANSCRIPT
Electromagnetic Shearing of Ultra High Strength Steels
PIs: Brad Kinsey, UNHJyhwen Wang, TAMU
Executive Summary:
• Objective/Industrial Need: effective shearing of UHSS (>1 GPa)
• Approach: electromagnetic shearing with durable coil fabrication
• Deliverables: assessment of shear edge condition and coil life
• Budget and Timeline: $150k for 1.5 years; supports one RA
• Comments: close collaboration with Bmax on project for experiments; integrates with additional project on “Prediction of trimmed edge stretching performance”
NSF I/UCRC Planning Meeting Slide 2
10. Electromagnetic Shearing of Ultra High Strength Steels
Industrial Need and Relevance:
• Shearing of UHSS components in a manner that will not cause downstream failures, e.g., edge cracking, is challenging.
• Electromagnetic (EM) shearing is dominated by bending/compression deformation versus shear fracture in conventional shearing.
• While EM shearing is a promising alternative, coil life and strength are concerns.
NSF I/UCRC Planning Meeting Slide 3
10. Electromagnetic Shearing of Ultra High Strength Steels
Conventional shearing
Electromagnetic shearing
Uhlmann and Scholz, 2003, Dortmund Colloquium
10. Electromagnetic Shearing of Ultra High Strength Steels
Project Objectives:
• Effectively shear UHSS (> 1 GPa)
• Characterize shear edge condition through microstructural analyses
• Extend EM coil strength and life so can be effectively implemented in a production environment
NSF I/UCRC Planning Meeting Slide 4
Combined forming and shearing operation
10. Electromagnetic Shearing of Ultra High Strength Steels
Approach/Methodologies:• To create more a durable EM coil, take
advantage of electromagnetics in process.
• Electrical energy is only concentrated on the outer edge of the coil cross-section in the skin depth area. Thus, this is the only location in the cross-section where the highly conductive, lower strength material is required.
• Credit for this idea is given to Erman Tekkaya’s group at TU-Dortmund, Germany.
NSF I/UCRC Planning Meeting Slide 5
Failure of insulator material
Failure of coil material
Golovashchenko, JMEP, 2007
10. Electromagnetic Shearing of Ultra High Strength Steels
Approach/Methodologies:
• Skin depth calculated from:
• Typical values ~1-1.5 mm
NSF I/UCRC Planning Meeting Slide 6
𝛿 = 2𝜌
𝜇0𝜇𝑟𝜔
ρ = Electrical resistivity of coil materialµr = Permeability of coil materialµ0 = Permeability of free space (4π×10−7 N/A2)ω = Angular frequency of the circuit (e.g., ω=8.1x104 rad⁄s)
Normalized current densities
Steel base
Outer Cu layer
• Electroplating will be used to create thin Cu layer on outer edge of steel EM coil
10. Electromagnetic Shearing of Ultra High Strength Steels
Approach/Methodologies:
• Once coil is fabricated, both conventional (for comparison) and EM shearing experiments will be conducted.
NSF I/UCRC Planning Meeting Slide 7
Kamal and Daehn, JMSE, 2007
Coil with leads to capacitor back
Coil embedded in epoxy
Thibaudeau, MS Thesis 2011
10. Electromagnetic Shearing of Ultra High Strength Steels
Deliverables:
• Assessment of shear edge condition from both EM and conventional processes
• Plated, durable electromagnetic coil
• Analyses of coil strength and life
• Criteria and empirical guidelines for process implementation
NSF I/UCRC Planning Meeting Slide 8
Thibaudeau, MS Thesis 2011
10. Electromagnetic Shearing of Ultra High Strength Steels
Budget and Timeline:
Estimated cost of the project is $150k for 1.5 year.
Includes RA support, costs for coil fabrication, and testing
NSF I/UCRC Planning Meeting Slide 9
Task / MilestoneYear 1 Year 2
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Fabricate coil
EM shearing & coil life testing
Conventional shearing tests
Shear edge characterization
10. Electromagnetic Shearing of Ultra High Strength Steels
Discussion:
– Are the industrial need and relevance accurately captured?
– Are the objectives realistic and complete?
– Are the approaches technically sound and appropriate?
– Are there alternative implementation paths or better approaches?
– Are the deliverables impactful to industrial partners?
– Are the budget and timeline reasonable?
– Are there conflicts with intellectual property or trade secrets?
NSF I/UCRC Planning Meeting Slide 10