eis 260 aa05261 2 proposed extensions to existing gravel ... 260_aa052612.pdfeis 260 aa05261 2...
TRANSCRIPT
EIS 260
AA05261 2
Proposed extensions to existing gravel removal operations
adjacent to portions 102 & 159, Parish of Tomerong, Shire of
Shoalhaven by W.J. Schofield & Sons
NS TMAR1 1NUSR1ES
AA05261 2
LANDSCAPE PLANNING SERVICES 10 EAST STREET NOWRA telephone (044) 212588 ROSS LAMOND AFFORESTATION PLANTATION SERVICES PAUL BISHOP pty limited Associates
AICHFtECTS + LANDSCAPE PLANNERS
Proposz)d Ext(~)ns~ons to EAsUng 0 rav R(~)movci
OperciUons AJjacent to Porfions 102&I'Qu
PcHsh of Tomerong Shm of Shodhaven
By W.J. Schofidd a Sons
MIF7
IF ifftJ
ILI
n ~'-- ~-tP' (' -/ (--, FORM 4
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT ACT, 1979 (section 77 (3) (d))
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
This Statement has been prepared by or on behalf of W.J. SCHOFIELD & SONS
being the applicant making the development application referred to below.
The Statement accompanies the development application in respect of the
development described as fo1lows=
Proposed Extension to Existing Gravel Removal Operations
at Tomerong.
The development application relates to the land described as follows:-
Crown Land adjoining Portions 102 and 159
Parish of Tomerong,
County of St. Vincent,
Shire of Shoalhaven
The contents of this statement as required by clause 34 of the Environmental
Planning and Assessment Regulation, 1980 are set forth in the accompanying
pages.
Name Qualifications and Address
of person who prepared Environmental
Impact Statement
PAUL BISHOP B.Sc (Arch) B.Arch
of Paul Bishop Pty Limited & Associates
Architects and Landscape Planners
10 East Street
Nowra 2541
I, P.R. BISHOP, of NOWRA
hereby certify that I have prepared the contents of this Statement in
accordance with clauses 34 and 35 of the Environmental Planning and
Assessment Regulation, 1980.
Signature
Date
CONTENTS
14
14
Page No.
BACKGROTJND INFORMATION 1.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 3.
DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT 13.
ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 16.
REQUIREMENTS OF DEPARTMENTS AND AUTHORITIES 19.
CONCLUSION 21.
ANNEXURES
Site Location 1.
Site Location 2.
General Site Layout
Existing Site Conditions
Photographs
D.E.P.
Development Approval, Existing Quarry
LANDSCAPE PLANNING SERVICES 10 EAST STREET NOWRA telephone (044) 21 288 ROSS LAMOND AFFORESTATION PLANTATION SERVICES PAUL BISHOP ptv limited & Associates
AICH[TECTS + LANDSCAPE PLANNERS
PROPOSED EXTENSION TO EXISTING GRAVEL REMOVAL OPERATION. ADJACENT TO PORTIONS 102 & 159 PARISH OF TOMERONG, SHIRE OF SROALHAVEN.
By W.J. Schofield & Sons
1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1.1 The Proposal
The Applicant, W.J. Schofield & Sons, presently operate a gravel
removal operation in an area commonly termed the "hell hole" at
TQmerong, south of Nowra.
They have worked this site, leased from the Department of Lands for
a period of four years and have now virtually worked out the present
lease. As of 1st November, 1984, there remains only approximately
100 cubic metres of poorer sub-base quality gravel stockpiled which
is expected to last only another month.
Applications were made to the Department of Lands last February, to
extend their current lease by approximately 14,000 m2 onto the
adjoining area of Crown Land to the west, and this has been approved
in principal, subject to compliance with the requirements of Shoalhaven
City Council and the Department of Environment and Planning.
A survey carried out by the Applicants, found this to be one of the
best remaining natural gravel deposits in the area and has the obvious
advantage of being conveniently situated adjacent to their current,
site, thus allowing for a continuous operation.
The gravel is to be used as a rough surfacing material principally in
the upgrading and maintenance of roads in the Commonwealth territory
around Jervis Bay and for general subdivision work in the Shoalhaven
Shire.
The proposal is that the Applicants be permitted to continue their
existing gravel removal operations on the adjacent site.
1.2 Location
The proposed extraction site is situated immediately to the south
of the Applicants existing lease and is approximately 22 kilometers
from Nowra.
The area is edged in red inannexures 3 and 4. In relation to the
nearest villages, it is approximately 11 kilometers from Klimpton
and 11 kilometers from Tomerong, kLimpton having a population of
approximately 50 and Tomerong having a population of approximately
150.
The nearest residence is on the highway approximately 7 kilometers
from the site.
1.3 Land Zoning and Tenure
The subject land is owned by the Crown and adjoins portion 102 in
- the Parish of Tomerong, County of St. Vincent.
The current zoning under Shoalhaven City Council Interim Development
Order No. 1 is "Non-urban lA' and its proposed zoning under Council's
Draft Local Environment Plan is "Rural 1A".
-2--
-3-
2
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
2.1 Characteristics and Economic Significance of the Resource
As noted previously, the gravel in the proposed pit area is of
particularly good quality. It represents one of the very few
remaining sites within the Shoalhaven area producing gravel.
which complies with the compaction and grading tests for roadbuilding
purposes required by the various Authorities.
The material from the proposed extraction site complies with the
requirements of the Australian Department of Housing and Construction,
and as such, is suitable for their road construction purposes.
As yet, the material has not been tested to see if it complies with
the Department of Main Roads Form No. 744 (as amended) being the
"Specification for the Supply of Natural Gravel or Crushed Rock for
Road Pavements, (Bitumen Surfaced)" or Form No. 801 being for
"Specification for the Supply of Natural Gravel or Crushed Rock for
Road Pavements, (not Bitumen Surfaced)". However, gravel from
Council's pit in the same area when mechanically stabilised with 436
micron sand has been found to comply with Form No. 801 and the
grading rule test for Al gravel.
Although the various consumers of road building material within
Shoalhaven City Council area rely primarily on the gravel deposits
at Tomerong, known locally as ironstone ridge gravel, this material
can vary considerably in quality over a very small area. Deposits
range from those tested as Al to deposits (such as from Council's
pit) requiring expensive mechanical stabilisation with up to 337 added
sand volume.
A survey of the area carried out by the Applicant, has indicated that
the proposed site represents probably the best of the remaining
deposits. The depth varies from 300 mm to 1200 mm covered by
approximately 300 mm of overburden allowing for easy and economical
removal. Other sites investigated in the area were either too shallow
or of poor quality.
-.4-
The deposit also contains an ideal amount of sandy overburden,
sandstone, ironstone and gravel which when correctly mixed
together assists in the resulting gravel mix attaining the
required test results without having to resort to mechanical
stabilization methods. Material excavated several years ago
from this same ridge was tested and shown to comply with D.M.R.
standards.
At the present time, the closest natural gravel deposits of
comparable standard or better are located at Batemans Bay
representing considerable cost penalties for transportation.
The proposed lease from the Department of Lands for this
extension of gravel removal operation will extend over an area
of approximately 14,000 sq. m. and the allowable depth for
extraction will be a maximum of 1 metre. Allowing for the
varying depths of the deposits and other indeterminate factors,
it is estimated that approximately 5,000 cubic metres will be
extracted from the site over a two year life expectancy, resulting
in a payment of approximately $3,000.00 in royalties alone.
The red gravel from the new pit is also particularly desired by the
Department of Housing and Construction for the continuing upgrading
and maintenance of roads within the Commonwealth Territory surrounding
Jervis Bay because it matches the colour and consistency of the
existing gravel (which came from the existing pit operated by the
Applicants on the adjoining site to that proposed) and because of
if its higher than average quality.
Potential contracts for the supply of the gravel for roadbuilding and
surfacing are assured not only with the Department of Housing and
Construction, but with other Public Authorities and Private Companies.
This proposed extension of an existing gravel removal area represents
probably one of the last remaining sites which can produce high quality
gravel at a relatively cheap price. The alternatives are to mechanically
mix the poorer quality gravels with other materials or to crush and mix
sandstone, siltstone, or basalt, all of which result in a higher priced
product.
-5-
As a comparison, gravel from the proposed site can be delivered
to Jervis Bay for a price of $12.00 per cubic metre compared to
crushed siltstone from South Nowra for $20.00 per cubic metre and
$32.00 per cubic metre for crushed basalt from Kiama. Even though
the end product of these crushedrock products may be somewhat
superior in quality, they would not provide the required aesthetic
result on the existing red gravel roads around Jervis Bay and other
similar areas,
2.2 Methods of Extraction and Types of Equipment Used
The method of extraction will be similar to that employed by the
Applicants in their existing operation on the adjacent site.
A portion of the site is firstly cleared of larger timber and
undergrowth by bulldozing onto a previously cleared portion of the
site where it will be burnt and the ashes spread over therevegetation.
area. During bushfire periods the material is stockpiled until fire
restrictions are lifted. Only enough timber is cleared to permit the
immediate removal operations. If the site were to be totally cleared,
as has been the case with the other pits in the area, the removal of
the trees and roots tends to either dry out the sub-base or allow
greater water infiltration both of which affects the end quality of the
gravel. The topsoil and nutrient material is then scraped onto an area
previously mined where some will be spread over the surface to assist
in plant regeneration and the remainder stockpiled for future respreading
over the area currently mined. Not all the overburden is removed as a
small portion is retained in-situ to assist in achieving a good gravel
mix when excavated.
The excavation process involved working to a face not stripping off in
layers.
The applicants have found that the best gravel mix is achieved by
working to the full depth of the face (approximately 1 metre deep)
by shaving at an angle with a bulldozer over a maximum width of 10 metres.
Some of the sandy loam overburden is then mixed with the ironstone,
sandstone and gravel to produce a gravel mix of very high quality.
LA
They have also found that the gravel should not be stockpiled for
more than a month as it tends to deteriorate rapidly when it dries
out or becomes saturated with rainwater.
The best method is to shave off the material and load it directly onto
a truck as required. It seems that this is the only way the moisture
level can be maintained at an ideal level.
The shaving method also tends to break up the large ironstone rocks
which may be encountered, whereas if the area is scraped, these rocks
would normally be merely pushed away.
If these procedures are correctly implemented, then the gravel once laid,
watered and the compacted, produces a very hard surface.
It is anticipated that the following equipment will be used on the site:
caterpillar D6 Bulldozer
955 trackscavator
- (c) 4 bogey-wheel tip trucks in peak periods with an overall average
of only two trucks.
There would be on average, four, eight tonne truck trips to and from
the site each day intermittently when the pit is being used with a
peak capacity of about eight truck trips per day. The bulldozer would
normally be stored at the applicants workshop and depot at Bomaderry
and be brought to the site at monthly intervals or otherwise as required
to mix and stockpile the gravel. The loader would also be transported to
and from the site as required on the back of a tip truck. No equipment
is left on site when the pit is not being worked.
2.3 Transportation
As can be seen from the accompanying site plan, vehicles using the
proposed extraction site will travel by public road. The road is
generally in a well maintained condition and serves the other gravel
pits in the area as well as for forestry purposes.
-7-
Sight line distances at all intersections are excellent.
The proposed extension to the gravel removal operation will not
increase the volume of traffic using the road as the application
merely involves the relocation of the current operation onto the
adjoining site.
2.4 Life of the Operation
The site will be worked intermittently depending on demand and it
is anticipated that the deposit will be depleted within two years.
2.5 Number of Persons Employed
When fully operational in peak periods, there will be two plant
operators and four truck drivers working on the site.
2.6 Noise
The noise generated will come from the machinery used for extraction,
loading and transporting the material.
It is expected that noise levels from the site equipment will measure
81-86 dB (A) at 15 metres. This would be similar to the other existing
gravel operations in the area and is somewhat insignificant when
compared to the blasting operations which occur on the adjacent sandstone
quarry site.
The large distance away from houses means that there will be only very
minor nuisance value caused to residents by noise and the level will not
be increased beyond that which presently exists.
2.7 Hours of Operation
It is intended that the site will be operated only during normal working
hours, 7.00 a.m. to 4.00 p.m., Monday to Friday.
1. 2.8 Dust
Work at the construction site will cause dust. However, the type of
extraction process proposed involving small areas being worked at a
time and only small stockpiles of material on site, means that the
dust generation aspect would be fairly minimal compared to the much
larger quarry operations in the area.
It is proposed also that a landscaped tibufferl? will be retained around
the perimeter of the site and this will help in abating any dust
problems. Vehicles travelling to and from the site will also generate
dust, but once again this proposal will not increase the current level
or road transport using the road and the large distance to the nearest
houses should mean that the dust nuisance problem would be minimal.
2.9 Proposals for Rehabilitation
At present, the Department of Lands requires that, once mining operations
have been completed, the stockpiled overburden material be respread over the
disturbed area and the whole surface ripped with a bulldozer to a depth
of 300 mm. The ripping operation allows for the aeration of the sub-base
and the infiltration of rainwater as well as a means by which roots of
the young self sown plants can establish quickly in the very hard sub-base
material.
To ensure that this work in restoring the existing land area is correctly
carried out and the whole area rehabilitated generally, the Department
currently holds a $1,500.00 bond.
Should the Applicant be permitted to extend the gravel removal operations
onto the adjacent site, the Department would require that the same
rehabilitation methods be employed and a similar bond would be kept as
assurity.
The Applicant propose that the following work will be carried out to
restore the existing worked out area.
1. The naturally vegetated buffer strip retained alongside Parma Creek
Fire Trail will be cleaned up by dozer only where necessary to push
away any remaining tree trunks and overburden material.
S
Care will be taken not to damage any existing vegetation and sapling
regrowth or to disturb the natural nutrient and surface compost layers.
The sides of the existing pit will then be shaved to an angle of
incline not exceeding about 150 to limit any erosion problems that
may occur and the whole distrubed surface shaped as necessary to
approximately the finished levels. The stockpiled overburden material
will then be spread over the entire surface to ensure a uniform
cover. Once these operations have been dompleted the surface will
then be deep ripped.
It is not proposed that all of the existing mined out area will be
rehabilitated at this time as a portion of the site will be required
for the stockpiling of gravel and overburden material proposed to be
removed from the adjoining site.
To ensure that the natural self sown forest regrowth will occur
as quickly as possible, the Applicant proposed to take suitable
measures to ensure that the area is no longer disturbed. This
would involve the placing of logs or other suitable barriers across
several open areas between the trees fronting the roadway where cars
or other vehicles could have previously entered. In addition, if it
can be shown not to be a hazard to any animals in the area, the large
width of the existing pit area will be traversed with a steel star peg
fence between log straining posts with two plain wire strands and cloth
markers clearly defining its position. This fence will separate the
restored area from the work area and will be progressively moved across
the site to follow the continuing mining operation.
As can be seen from the accompanying photographs, a portion of the site
is traversed after heavy rain by stormwater runoff from the road.
This is obviously the lowest point of the site and represents a natural
drainage route to the gulley and creek beyond. The road catchment area
is relatively small as the gradient is minimal along that section of
road and there is only a very gentle cross fall over the site so the
small flow of water is not of any great concern to vehicles needing to
cross over. The water is never more than several centimetres deep and
the hard gravel surface does not turn boggy. Erosion potential is also
very low due to the very hard sub-base material.
4
-10-
Measures which will be taken to reduce the effect of this
runoff include the placing of logs and rocks down the slope
from the roadway into the old pit area approximately 800 mm
below, to slow down the flow rate and reduce the potential for
Scouring.
As an interim measure the course would be relocated approximately
5 metres to the north by gentle shaping with a dozer blade so
that it goes well clear of the proposed gravel and overburden
stockpile from the proposed pit extension. As the pit moves
progressively to the south and the stockpiles are no longer required
in that area the whole of the surface will then be partially ripped
at approximately 5 metre intervals tranverse to the flow of the
water to allow for some regrowth yet at the same time not break up
the surface to an extent where there is a risk of erosion. Even
though the watercourse has flowed over the site now for several years
without any measures taken to restrict or influence its flow, there
is virtually no indication of any erosion problems as a result.
At present, the access road into the site forms the boundary between
the existing pit area and the proposed extension to the pit. It also
serves as the access into the gravel and sandstone pits on the
adjoining portion 102. Although there is no formal "right of way"
across the subject crown land giving access to the adjoining private
holding, and there are several other existing but unused tracks into
portion 102 from the road well clear of the Applicants mining operations
the Applicant will still maintain this access through the gravel pit.
To enable the area beneath the existing road to be mined, where the
depth of gravel is approximately 1200 mm, the road will need to be
temporarily relocated several metres to the north through the mined
out pit area. No trees or vegetation will be distrubed during this
work and the Applicant has indicated that the road area could be
completely mined and the new access road reinstated in the same
position but at the lower level within one day if necessary to lessen
the inconvenience caused to the adjoining property holders.
-11-
As mentioned previously, the mining operation involves the periodic
clearing of the site and mining only as the gravel is required.
To ensure a product of the highest standard, trees should not be
removed from the mine area for more than several months prior to
mining and for similar reasons, gravel should not be stockpiled on
site for more than one month. This means that the mining operation
is a continuing process.
Should the Applicant be permitted to extend his gravel removal operation
after the adjoining site then the rehabilitation process is proposed
to be continuous as we].l,
Once the trees and shrubs have been removed, they are to be burnt on
the adjacent mined area & the residue spread over the previously
topsoiled and ripped surface to assist further in seed distribution of
the native species. The topsoil and overburden will be stripped and
stockpiled and then, after mining, it will be spread over the site beforE
ripping. The main difference between the operation on the existing leas€
and that proposed for the new area will be that the rehabilitation proceE
will be continuous rather than delayed until the completion of the entirE
mining operation. To protect the newly rehabilitated areas, the star
post fence previously discussed will be relocated to alongside the
northern side of the access roadway.
Much of the overburden material scraped off the adjoining privately
owned site has been deposited over the proposed boundary of the
Applicants lease. This material will be scraped to a much less angle
of recline and tidied up generally to assist regrowth. Tree trunks
and rubbish deposited on the site will also be removed by the
Applicant and burnt.
The proposed extension to the lease allows for a 20 metre wide buffer
strip of natural forest to be retained along the full length of the
road frontage and the adjoining portion 102. The Applicant undertakes to
maintain this buffer in a natural state and to take steps to prevent
its distubance by vehicles by the placing of log barriers etc, across
existing and potential access points.
4
4 -12-
Other depleted gravel pits in the area which have •not been
rehabilitated at all have shown a substantial self sown
vegetation cover within a 2 year period indicating that if
appropriate steps are taken to prevent casual encrouchment
or disturbance by vehicles, an appropriate rehabilitation of
the Applicants site will be satisfactorily completed within
a similar period.
-13-
3. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
3.1 Existing Site Conditions
The Applicant has operated a gravel extraction pperation on the
adjoining site for the past four years.
The area is renowned for its high quality gravel and is, therefore,
characterized by several depleted and existing gravel removal
operations.
Within the immediate area, there are two very large operational
gravel pits. One adjoins the subject land on Portion 102 and
extracts both gravel and sandstone for crushing, and the other is
operated by Shoalhaven City Council on a site approximately 1
kilometer away.
As can be seen from the enclosed Topographical map for the area, the
J(II)((t. flht( Is IO(tlt(d Ofl a Hulal I H dge With a p,(flL ly ('FOSS tall to
the north west. Approximately 300 metres from the western boundary.
the land drops steeping away over a sandstone cliff edge into a
gorge formed by Parma Creek. Minor overflow of stormwater goes
through the pit to flow mt Parma Creek and the existing pit area
does not inhibit this flow to the north west.
The nearest features of cultural or social significance to the site are
the villages of Tomerong with a population approximately 100 and
Klimpton with a population of approximately 50. Both are small rural
residential communities and both are approximately 7 kilometers away in
a straight line. The nearest residence to the site is at the "Log Cabin'
Roadhouse on the highway approx. 6 km away. There is also a "Bike Farm"
for trail bike enthusiast. situated approximately 6 kilometers away.
The only feature of economic significance in the area apart from the
other gravel pits, is the Forestry Commission operation along Blackbutt
Ridge Fire Trail, the main access road to the site off the highway.
There are no farms in the area due to the nature and lack of topsoil
+
-14-
The access road to the site is principally used by trucks servicing
the gravel pits in the area and for forestry purposes. Although
the road eventually links through to Trunk Road 96 to Braidwood,
it deteriorates to a very poor condition after 6 kilometers from
the subject site at a crossing over Parma Creek. From here the
road is passable only by the most avid of adventurers in four
wheel drive vehicles.
There is no indication that the-area has any tourist resource and as
such, the site would not be subject to scrutiny from passsng traffic.
The proponents are not aware of any features within or adjacent to
the site of archeological significance.
3.2 Vegetation
The area of the proposed gravel pit extension has been recently affected
by fire. Consequently plant species present are relatively immature.
Eucalyptus gummifera and Eucalyptus eugeniodes are the dominant species.
Banksia serrata and Syncarpia glomulifera are prevalent throughout
the site. Associated species include:
Banksia spinulosa
Lamberia formosa,
Persoonia levis
Patersonia glabrata
Acacia stricta
Hakea sericea
Boronia reticulata
Boronia ledifolia
Cassinia longifolia
Acacia longifolia
Isopogon anethifolios
Telopea speciosissima
Pimilea humilis
Xanthorrhoea australis
Compholobium latifolium
Daviesia ramosissima
-15--
From an environmental point of view, significant damage has already
occured in the area due to logging operations over many years.
It has been an important pit prop producing area for at least 50
years with many mills once scattered throughout the area mainly
seeking turpentine, ironbank and spotted gum.
Although virtually every mill has long since vanished, the area is
still extensively logged by the Forestry Commission,
An extensive area along the access road to the gravel pit site has
recently been selectively cleared by the Commission. A controlled
"Trickle burn" has been allowed to go through the understory and
undesirable largerspecies such as Eucalpptus gummifera, have been
ringbaked so as to encourage the growth primarily of Eucalyptus
macculata and Eucalyptus pilularis. This cycle for pit prop production
is usually repeated every 8 to 10 years.
Whereas the native forest provides for, and for some species even
relies on a bushfire every couple of years, for regeneration,
- the trickle burn process and selective logging practises represent
a highly debatable problem in ecological terms. It would be relatively
- safe to say, however, that these forestry operations do have a
significant effect on the natural ecology of the area and the forest is
no longer in a natural state.
From an economic point of view, the immediate area of the proposed gravel
pit has been previously logged and there are no longer any trees of
sufficient value to warrant their preservation for forestry purposes.
As previously mentioned, the main species remaining are Eucalyptus
gummifera and Eucalpytus eugeniodes and these have no intrinsic
commercial value.
4, -16-
4, ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
4.1 Erosion and Siltation
The small volume and velocity of the stormwater runoff from the
road which presently crosses the pit area after heavy rain does
not appear to present any significant erosion problems. The
sub-base material is very hard and the Applicants will take several
measures to reduce even further the potential of erosion.
The Water Resourses Commission have indicated that the proposed
extensions to the gravel removal operation onto the adjacent site
will not increase the current siltation levels in Parma Creek and
would have no impact on the quality of the domestic water, supply
of farms further downstream.
4.2 Possible Cumulative Effects
As the proposed gravel pit is merely the continuation of an existing
operation to be carried out on the adjacent site, no cumulative
- effects are anticipated.
4.3 Flora and Fauna
Approximately 35% of the site will be retained in its natural state to
act as a buffer to the roadway and the adjoining private holding.
The remainder of the site will be gradually cleared over the estimated
2 year life of the operation
Rehabilitation work on the existing quarry will be carried out almost
immediately and re-establishment of the native underbrush should
occur naturally within 2 to 3 years.
Native fauna would suffer to the extent that they would be deprived of
that area as a living and feading habit. However, the native
animals which may frequent this area would already be accustomed to
the workings of machinery on the two adjoining sites and the passing
of traffic and no adverse affects can be foreseen.
-17-
* 4.4 Aboriginal Sites
The National Parks and Wildlife Service has indicated that
nothing of any significance has been recorded in the area of
the subject site. Even though there is a very low likelihood of
finding anything of significance, they still request that a survey
of the site be carried out should the Development Application be
approved.
4.5 Noise and Dust
As previously stated, the noise and dust levels from machinery
working on site and from trucks travelling to and from the site
will not be increased beyond current levels. The nearest residences
are at least 6 kilometers away and there should be little if any
nuisance value.
4.6 Trucking Levels and Highways
Overall, the level of operation will remain the same as presently
exists and should not have any impact. All the roads are well
maintained and sight distances are excellent.
4.7 Waste Material Disposal
As there is very little stripping required prior to reaching good
gravel (approximately 300 mm) and as all the stripped material will
be stockpiled on site, for future restoration work, there will be no
waste products produced. Timber and undergrowth removed during the
initial clearing operations will be burnt on previously cleared land
and in such a manner so as not to create a fire hazard or contravene
restrictions imposed in high fire danger periods.
l8
4.8 Landscaping and Visual Impact
Although the work site will be only 20 metres from the roadway,
it will be visually screened to an extent by the natural
vegetation retained in this buffer zone. The proposed quarry is
also very small in comparison with others in the area and should
therefore, have a lesser impact. The methods previously discussed
by which the Applicants will protect these landscaped buffer zones
from damage and rehabilitate the disturbed areas after mining should
ensure that the operation will have only a minimum impact especially
since the access road is only used generally by trucks servicing the
gravel pits in the area and for forestry purposes.
-19-
5. REQUIREMENTS OF DEPARTMENTS AND AUTHORITIES
5.1 Lands Office
The Department of Lands approves in principal to the granting of
a Quarry Licence subject to compliance with any conditions imposed
on the Development Application.
5.2 Water Resources Commission
As the existing levels of siltation in Parma Creek will not be
substantially increased by the Development, no objection to the
proposal is raised.
5.3 National Parks and Wildlife Service
The service reports that they have nothing on record to suggest
that there is anything of aboriginal significance in the area,
however, they would still wish to conduct a survey, should the
proposal be approved.
5.4 Department of Public Works
As the site is adjacent several other operational gravel pits and the
proposal is merely to extend an existing operation onto an adjacent
site, the Department can see no objection with the proposal at this
stage but have asked to see a more detailed analysis of the proposal.
The subject site is not within any Environmental Protection Zones
including:
Wetlands Protection
Estuarine Wetlands Protection
Water Catchmerit Areas Protection
7(dl) Scenic Protection
7(d2) Special Scenic Protection
7(e) Escarpment Protection
7(fl) Coastal Protection
4
-20-
7(f2) Coastal Reservation
7(f3) Foreshore Protection
5.5 Shoalhaven City Council
The Council is the consent Authority for the proposal.
-21-
6. CONCLUSION
The proposal involves merely the extension of existing gravel
removal operations onto an adjacent site of only approximately
14,000 m2. As such, the Environmental Impact of the development
will be almost minimal.
- - IN -
\ ( Cambewarra\_~h ~tby, I %%
- t 2-6 i'° a er y warral.t Tapitallee
17g0, 0 ç0PD, 23
1' —
° C 0o J TI, 12 2
r ow
4
Wogamia , FtocI
\ (J
Bamaran9 I-?
11 '" TAT FO ES
\J'IndhtrI Ete'
EL pIr
W.
20
11.9
umbaa co o L0 O'K.(.t (Z
F rerara
4 (
4
qrooha o L
e. .
"
reenwe - B Ufl ee
9-1 t. 1-7 71
Pyrer O0 4 4
Wor igee yi w 0kjF ..Schooi
)t 9/21
0
Pdg
. - 14
# fl 4
4
42
Cree ) k 50
r4 -roy
:-....... 14
iIF oi
4
uj stwterwamp
Air oCl
ub-
2.2 ico
H.N. S. A I Es '12 6
tation
Park
ARMA 2.5/?
WILLOCt % ( /;
\ 7/ ->7/ (6\ 41-5 2-3
SS;My OI0
oc Wool1amia PA50N
¶-Qti L7 H
7.5 CO
STATE
D 135 / 2
Th
217 p0ITE 0'
f
3 34 22 ..
58 / -- 'ER J yIod 2)1 / - 70 \R
D. f 22O' i 60ookout
/
_-' 72 — 'çofl'on \ /TOfl1' ng P,Nc 7 EvcLN/ *- / - / PbSo9 -8 1 3-8 &3. I
- - DOiiip TUR 141 20 LDL1FE SANCTUARY 061,
- - . ' ATTUNGA e I A/I~NdDRIVE
Ole Hway 01ut1lofNoiv
Suffolk i 4 4 6
25 Stge
Sryt and
I \c\ \ Tip / CP
\ 21 13 9 sPe/icanPt- — .
- , -' i"!. /s/andPt.i-'.-- h1 1/ J r L kopt —
- e Wand a B ewo n Ba sin1 Sepicra h l
-. 1. PAD IV GadeJ //J1 -.. 28 — 8
18 c ree ' Jliy Picnic Pt Mac/pans Pt
..w CuR I / 'I
S B A
Site Location 2 SLE:
2km
159 tP OF CUFFS-
ri
&LVM C%T'( 4C4L- &1L. %T
Ptl-.
Ui 2 J
V5H 9, CAVL
.EMOVAL LkR'(
SOui4tRY APPRc,X.
102 CLEtRD
LZED - OP-
ORiC.F.EE 11EE
75 ri RED EDGE: quarry license for gravel removals-
11 WJSCHOFIELD & SONS BLUE EDGE about 1 ha. Ii application for additional area.
PARRrS\-i - i tic cY.JN7I( - S V1 E--1r L'3t2 DTPJCT JQW Crr'c' - SHoU-IVEKJ.
107
General Site Layout SCQE 100 200 300m
(1 1OCCO)
POR 102
$
oc-P LE. IOQ Q -
POR 159
Xt1G GQ'L fl-
L. cOCPL
fl
Exis ing Site Condition
I I SCALE 10 20 30m
(1: 1000)
RED EDGE quarry licence for gravel remwc AMA WJ, SCHOFIELD & SONS
BLUE EDGE: application for additionat are
-TOMc-QOt-G COQN1X- 5+. LM-D 3TQCT- -IO\VQ..&. CITY -
TYPICAL VEGETATION PROPOSED PIT AREA
Existing access road showing old pit on the right and the proposed pit area on the left.
Note: stormwater runoff from Parma Creek Fire Trail following heavy rain.
Natural buffer retained to visually screen existing pit area.
Existing access road looking back to Parma Creek Fire Trail,
Note: Depth of gravel deposits at face, approximately 1100 mm This face will be the first area worked as part of the proposed pit extension. I
Existing pit area which is now depleted and is to be covered with the stockpiled overburden material and ripped approximately 100 m to allow for natural forest regeneration.
EXISTING PIT
:
Stormwater runoff from Parma Creek Fire Trail following heavy rain.
Mined out area due to be revegetated.
EXISTING PIT
r r'
Existing access road through existing pit area to privately owned gravel and sandstone mine in background.
Existing privately owned gravel removal operation on adjacent site (Portion 102).
Adjacent existing pit showing existing tree buffer.
Road where it crosses Parma Creek approximately 7 m from proposed pit
becomes passable only by four wheel drive vehicles.
PARMA CREEK ROAD.
Fluge area of Council's pit in comparison to proposed quarry.
Note: Large stockpiled reserves and surface water.
Secondary access road.
Note: road surface water discharging onto site.
EXISTING PIT OPERATED BY SHOALHAVEN CITY COUNCIL
Approximately 5 kilometres further up Parma Fire Trail from proposed pit.
Intersection looking south
Intersection looking north
SIGHT LINES INTERSECTION OF BLACKBUTT FIRE TRAIL AND PRINCES HIGHWAY
SHDALHAVEN CITY COUNCIL
low OUR REF.: 82/2359 GP:JR ENQUIRIES: Mr G Ponton YOUR REF.:
CITY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTRE
OOX 42, P.O. NOWRA, N.S.W. 2541
PHONE: [044] 216011 TELEX 22488
hUb 1983 W J Schofield & Sons 18 Meroo Road BOMADI:unY ;'';'i 1
Dear, Sir,
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT ACT, 1979 NOTICE TO APPLICANT OF DETERMINATION OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
To: W J Schofield & Sons of 18 Meroo Road, Bomaderry being the applicant in respect of development application No. 82/2359 (Extractive Industry - Removal of Gravel), relating to the land described as follows:
Vacant Crown Land - Adjacent to Portions 159 & 102, Parish of Tomerong, County of St Vincent
Pursuant to Section 92 of the Act, notice is hereby given that the development application has been determined by granting of consent, subject to conditions.
The conditions of the consent and reasons for such conditions are set out as follows:-
Conditions of the City Planner:
Compliance with Standard Conditions, copy of which is attached.
All stripped topsoil shall be stockpiled for use in reinstating the subject site upon completion of quarrying.
Excavation shall not take place within 20 metres of the adjacent freehold land to the west.
4• No trees shall be removed within 20 metres of the public road.
To prevent ponding) excavation shall only be undertaken in a manner which does not obstruct the discharge of natural drainage.
The point, or points of surface water runoff shall be designed in a manner which prevents scour or erosion.
To facilitate restoration, the excavation shall be carried out in a proper workmanlike manner with sides battered at a slope not steeper than 1:4.
Blasting shall be carried out only in accordance with Ordinance 143 made under the Local Government Act.
'I
OUR REF.: CITY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTRE
ENDUIRIES: BOX 42, P.O. NOWRA, N.S.W. 2541
YOUR REF.: PHONE: [044) 216011 TELEX 22488
-2- W J Schofield & Sons ----------------------------------
15 AUG 1% -----------------------------------
8. Upon completion of quarrying operations, the area worked shall be filled and topsoiled and revegetated with flora indigenous to the area. All restoration work shall be completed to the satisfaction of Council.
Endorsement of date of CONSENT AUG
NOTES
This consent is valid for two years from the date hereon, unless an environmental planning instrument prohibiting the development is gazetted within one year of the date hereon. Then the consent is only valid for one year from the date that instrument comes into force.
Section 97 of the Act confers on an applicant who is dissatisfied with the determination of a consent authority a right of appeal to the Land and Environment Court exercisable within twelve (12) months after receipt of this notice.
Yours faithfully,
W. G. LAMOND, Town Cler
End.
New South Wales Government
Deportment of Environment and Planning Am
Remington Centre 1/5 Liverpool Street, Sydney 2000 Box 3927 C PC, Sydney 2001
Mr. P. R. Mahedy, DX.l5Sydney
Paul Bishop and Associates, 10 East Street, Telephone 02) 266 7111 Ex
NOWRA 2541 7568 Contact.
G. Reffell Our reterence:
84/305 5 Your reterence
Dear Sir,
Proposed Extension to Gravel Removal Operations adjacent to Portions 102 and 159, Parish of Tomerong. Shire of Shoalhaven. By W. J. Schofields and Sons.
Thank you for your letter dated 22nd June, 1984 which indicates that you are consulting with the Director with regard to the preparation of an environmental impact statement (E.I.S.).
As development consent is necessary for the proposal and it is designated development within the meaning of Schedule 3 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation, 1980, it is necessary that an E.I.S. accompany the development application to Council and to assist in comprehension, a copy of the Director's requirement should be appended to the E.I.S.
The basic requirement is that an E.I.S. be prepared in accordance with Clause 34 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation, 1980, and that it bear a certificate required by Clause 26(1)(b) of the Regulation.
With regard to the form and content of the E.I.S. it is advised the Director requires that you take into account matters specified in the attachment to this letter. These matters are to be adequately addressed in the statement and taken into account in the determination of the proposal by Council with whom we suggest you confer.
There are legislative requirements for the preservation of relics and aboriginal places. Where there is a possibility of these being encountered in development, the incorporation of an aboriginal archaeological survey as part of an environmental impact statement may be necessary. Where aboriginal archaeolog-ical surveys are needed, it is a requirement that they be undertaken by persons who are professionally qualified archaeologists or anthropologists, or who are members of the Association of Consulting Archaeologists. If in doubt on this matter, a proponent should consult with the National Parks and Wildlife Service.
Where matters are likely to come within the scope of legislation relative to air, water and noise control as administered by the State Pollution Control Commission, the view of the Commission should be sought. If aspects of the proposal significantly affect agricultural land or agricultural industry, the views of the Department of Agriculture should also be sought and appropriately addressed in the E.I.S.
Should you require any further information regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us again.
Yours fthfu1ly
Manager, 2sses- sments Branch DJe_iQITheDiretQi
NEW SOUTH WALES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING
11AQEALE
Proposed Extension to Gravel Removal Operations adjacent to Portions 102 and 159 Parish of Tomerong, Shire of Shoalhaven. By W.J. Schofields & Sons.
A comprehensive environmental impact statement should adequately cover all the matters specified in Clause 34 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation, 1980.
These matters should be clearly and succinctly outlined in the text and where appropriate supported by adequate maps, plans, diagrams or other descriptive details to enable all concerned to gain a clear understanding of the full scope of the development and its likely impact on the environment.
The following particular matters should be included in its coverage:
Background information.
Location of works. Broad nature and extent of works proposed. Land tenure, boundaries, site details in relation to environmental planning instrument zonings and any other land use ('OUSt 1,I hit
Detailed description of the proposal.
This description should not only describe the proposal at the site but also describe any associated operations such as winning and transport of materials, processes involved, disposal of wastes, rehabilitation, landscaping and use of the end product if likely to have environmental implications.
Particular matters to be covered include:
Characteristics and economic significance of the resource. Possible availability of alternative sources. Methods of extraction/plans of operations. Type of machinery and equipment to be used. Expected life of the operation. Number of persons to be employed. Hours of operation. Location and quantity of any necessary stockpiling. Access arrangements - truck routes and number of truck movements. Quantity of materials to be extracted. Noise levels. Proposals for rehabilitation and assurances of effective completion.
c? S4j-o.
Description of the environment.
This description should provide details of the environment in the vicinity of the development site and also of aspects of the environment likely to be affected by any facets of the proposal. In this regard, physical, natural, archaeological and economic aspects of the environment should be described to the extent necessary for assessm ent of the environmental impact of the proposed development.
Assessment of environmental impact and measures to be taken to reduce the impact especially with respect to:-
Details of proposed site drainage and treatment of the wat&course that runs through the proposed pit site. Any likely cumulative effects of the proposed operation when considered together with other operations in the vicinity. Possible effects of flooding on the operations. Effects on fauna and flora Likely noise disturbance caused by the operations, including transport operations, on nearby residences. Other impacts of trucking movements, (cL1.- uj ,i ifirmJ. Dust control and any nuisance likely to be caused. Water treatment and other pollution control measures.
o Disposal of waste material. Landscaping measures and effects on the visual environment. The proposed final use of the site, intended rehabilitation procedures and likely effectiveness of rehabilitation. Any likely affectation of sites of aboriginal archaeological or heritage value if located in the vicinity of the operations.
5. Authorities contacted.
Th.e names of authorities contacted should be listed. Any comments relating to specific matters of interest raised by such authorities should be declared, including those in relation to possible cumulative environmental problems that may result.
J SCJICFIEL .Nfl S
Fropod EXtEflS1OflS tO O;.iStiOO
rav2 rovai operatio.E a.jcei 12 rrcnr -
Frrower's namtj ______
MEO
J SiiOFiELD ND
Proposed extnsrs to YitiflQ
rEocva! orotons Jcert to pors
102 & 1:1 Parish Tomeri-Ong,