eft approach for the electron edm at two loops
TRANSCRIPT
1
EFT approach for the electron EDMat two loops
Marc RiembauUniversité de Genève
HEFT, April 2019
Based on 1810.09413, with G. Panico and A. Pomarol
3
relativistic limit
Nonvanishing d breaks CP
SM prediction:
e e3
1
2 2
3SM contribution is ridiculously small,EDM is a clear sign of New Phisics
SM
4Hints for this simplicity are old, coming from non-violations of accidental and approximate SM symmetries.In particular, CP:
6
Translation of ACME constraints to particle physics:
Two loops Chirality flip log enhanced
Relevant constraints even at two loops.
We want to characterize all effects that enter with
This is the key to help organize the contributions
9
It is useful to write the parameters in a more physical wayIt is useful to write the parameters in a more physical way
Due to approximate accidental cancellation, 1/2+2 Qe sin^2 0.04, Z boson ∼ 0.04, Z boson
contribution negligible.
12
This one is interesting, since a two loop, log^2 contribution competes with the single loop, no log contribution
Compared with 1loop,
which is O(1) for 5TeV
18
Leptoquarks
EDM sets strong constraints to leptoquarks that couple to both left and right leptons
19
Supersymmetry: 1 loop + tree
One loop EDMs are very important in SUSY.Exact expressions are very complicated, but now we know superpartners are heavy.
20
Supersymmetry: 2 loop + tree
At two loops, a Barr-Zee diagram gives sensitivity to stops.
Also understood via RGE of AFF to dipole. After integrating out the stops,
Nakai, Reece, 1612.08090
21
Supersymmetry: 1 loop + 1loop, HHFF
Since the decoupling 1/scalars^4, EDM via HHFF relevant in Split SUSY
For tan beta ~ CP phases ~ O(1)
22
Supersymmetry: 1 loop + 1loop, luqe
Contribution to luqe via squark-gauginos loop
with
For degenerate superpartner masses,
23
Consequences for Composite models
Take SO(5)/SO(4):
CMS B2G-16-019-pas
G.Panico, MR, T.Vantalon 1712.06337
31
HL-LHC projections:Constraints from ACME II
Electron EDM constraints and comparison with direct searches
Im(ct) has to be of order 0.01 if we want to be within LHC reach
34Evolution of electron EDM constraints
- After some time of promises of improvements with nothing happening, it seems that there will be further progress in a short time scale.- If there is a positive signal, we’ll have confirmation very quickly.- There are some proposals for a total breakthrough.
Projected datesare approximate
36Conclusions
- Map of the most relevant effects at two loops:
- Bounds of 1-100TeV for generic theories of leptoquarks
- Characterization of relevant constraints for the MSSM
- In composite models, CPV from top sector important. Top partners pushed outside LHC range, unless they have CP preserving couplings
- Unless there is a reason why, contrary to SM, BSM sector respects CP, ACME result makes these theories much less natural
- CPV in Higgs sector pushed way outside any current or future collider reach
37Conclusions
- Map of the most relevant effects at two loops:
- Bounds of 1-100TeV for generic theories of leptoquarks
- Characterization of relevant constraints for the MSSM
- In composite models, CPV from top sector important. Top partners pushed outside LHC range, unless they have CP preserving couplings
- Unless there is a reason why, contrary to SM, BSM sector respects CP, ACME result makes these theories much less natural
- CPV in Higgs sector pushed way outside any current or future collider reach
Thanks!
39Selection rules for the RGEs
Elias-Miro, Espinosa, Pomarol, 1412.7151
Cheung, Shen, 1505.01844
Rodrigo Alonso, Jenkins, Manohar, 1409.0868
Since Tom Melia already talked about it yesterday,let me just state again the recipe...
41
Recipe by Cheung, Shen, 1505.01844
Recipe is not final...The steps are necessary, but clearly not sufficientThe recipe does not have flavour
An increasing group of people is trying to bake a better one
42Dimension 8
If , dim 8 operators are parametrically leading
Only interested in wrong hypercharge 4fermion operators
43Finite contributions
Phases in the Yukawas of 3rd family fermions enter only via threshold correctionsat the EW scale.Due to their relevance, we include them despite being 2 loop and no log.
Both give similar result, since mt infinity with mt/mh fixed in both.→infinity with mt/mh fixed in both.
Finite contribution for electron Yukawa larger than log enhanced due to accidental cancelations, but only for below 10TeV.
44Finite contributions
Phases in the Yukawas of 3rd family fermions enter only via threshold correctionsat the EW scale.Due to their relevance, we include them despite being 2 loop and no log.
Double log enhancement for bottom, tau...(loop)^2 RGE after integrating out the Higgs
( For the bottom, the RGE below the EW scale has to be compared with the accidental cancellation in the RGE above the EW scale for the ledq operator! )
45
A word on
Neither the Weinberg operator nor its SU(2) counterpart can be generated at one loop by weakly coupled, spin ≤ 1 theories. At least, one needs two loops!
Couplings to field strength have to be modified, so extra loop seems to be always needed...