effluenttreatment in thetextile industry -...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Effluent Treatment
in the Textile Industry
2
“ … The textile industry is one of the most wastewater
intensive industries - if not the most wastewater relevant
one at all worldwide. …”
� “ … Therefore there is hardly a sector of industry known which needs
more to consider and to take care for providing measures of
sustainability in terms of the aquatic environment. … “
Wolfgang Höhn (Dipl. Ing. (FH))
3
“ .... Sustainability of waste water management in the textile industry:
It can be confidently achieved only by a well organized companyconcept comprising permanently optimized methods ofproduction integrated wastewater minimization, effluentclearing and waste water recycling.
This is nowadays a crucial challenge for the holisticenvironmental management of a textile finishing company, theimportance of which is permanently increasing over the years. …”
Senior technical consultant and Owner Hoehn Textile Engineering
What will you learn now?
4
1. Effluent minimization within the textile production…
2. Effluent minimization after the textile production...
Find your position in the textile chain!
5
1. Textile industry effluent - situation report
2. Effluent impact by the textile industrya) Most relevant effluent impacts by the textile industryb) Fibre focussed impact: Cellulosic, protein and synthetic fibresc) Make up focussed impact: yarn, knitgood, woven fabric
3. Effluent regulations an guidelines for the textile industrya) Global and municipal governmental effluent regulationsb) Governmental regulations vs. guidelines of private organizations
4. Effluent management in the textile industry
a) Survey of processes for effluent cleaning
b) Types of processes for effluent recycling
c) Textile effluent reduction by production integrated methods
e) Ideal waste water concept
Table of contents
6
Chapter 1:Situation of worldwide textile industry effluent
Textile industry effluent – situation report
7
The textile industry is the most effluent relevant industry segment worldwide
The effluent costs amount currently in average 10% of the total textile companycosts
• Effluent fees• Effluent treatment costs
Continuously more restrictive effluent laws and pressure by private regulations-> Efficient effluent management more and more important-> Permanently increasing price of textile product
Effluent discharge types• Direct discharge: appr. 5-10 % (tendency increasing)• Indirect discharge: appr. 90-95 % (tendency decreasing)
8
Chapter 2:Effluent impact by the textile industrydifferentiated by substrate
Most relevant effluent impactsby the textile industry
9
Color
High COD (DOC) value
Low bioeliminable (persistent/refractory) substances
Aquatoxic substances, inclusive
- Heavy metal ions (particularly Cr(III), Co(III) and Cu(II))
- AOX contributing substances
- APEO
- Sulphur containing substances
Bioaccumulating substances
Eutrophicating substances: Inorganic and organic N and P
Extreme pH values
High electrolyte concentrations
CMR (carcinogenic, mutagenic, reproduction toxic) substances
Origins of COD contribution by the textile industry
10
Sizes, Preparation agents, Fibre impurities
Pretreatment agents (Detergents)
Auxiliaries for dyeing/finishing
Colorants
50 - 60%
< 10%15 - 20%
Source: 3031ke.ppt
15 - 20%
Fibre specific impact to effluent(apart of preparations)
11
Native cellulosic fibres:
Native fibre impurities->COD
Mainly washing auxiliaries/sequestrants->COD
Salt->Electrolyte
Alkali->pH value
Dyestuff (reactive and sulphur dyeings)->Color
Quaternary polyammonia compounds->aquatoxic
Regenerated cellulosic fibres:
Same as native ones but without native fibre
impurities and washing auxiliaries/sequestrants
Protein fibres:
Native fibre impurities->COD
Washing and dyeing auxiliaries->COD
Cr, Co ->toxicity
Acid->pH value
Polyamide fibres:
See protein fibres but without fibre impurities
Polyester:
Washing and dyeing auxiliaries->COD
Alkali-> pH value
Org. and inorg. sulphur->Sulfite, Sulfide, Sulphate
Polyacrylnitrile:
Washing and dyeing auxiliaries ->COD
Acid-> pH value
Fibre blends:
See individual fibre impacts
Make up specific impact to effluent (preparations)
12
Yarn:
Lower amounts of mineral oil based
and synthetic preparations -> Low COD contribution
Knitgoods:
Higher amounts of mineral oil based and
synthetic preparations inclusive silicone -> Medium COD contribution
Woven fabrics:
High amounts of sizes:
- Synthetic sizes and warp waxes: -> High COD contribution
-> Bad bioleliminability
- Native sizes (starch and starch derivatives): -> Very high COD contribution
13
Chapter 3Effluent regulations and guidelines for thetextile industry
Global and regional governmental effluent regulations
14
In most countries the legal bases for discharge of waste water are defined in a general waste water law of government
This law is usually concretized for textile plants in a legal decree (for directdischargers) or by municipal statutes (for indirect dischargers) by definition of
- Commandments- Prohibitions- Limit values for different waste water parameters (ingredients)- Waste water fees
There are different regulations for direct and indirect discharge
Worldwide there is a tendency for these regulations to become step by stepmore severe and restrictive
Legal effluent regulations versus effluentguidelines of private organisations
15
Waste water limits by legal regulations
(government); e.g. App. 38 AbV, Germany
Waste water limits by guidelines of
private organizations (e.g. ZDHC,
Bluesign, GOTS, Li & Fung)
Reflect high expertise in waste water management Reflect usually minor expertise in waste water
management
In average the regulations are less severe and much
more feasible
In average the guidelines are more severe and less
feasible
Details:
- Clear differentiation between indirect and direct
discharge
- Only the really relevant parameters are regulated
- Mostly the limit values are higher to much higher
compared with private guidelines
Details:
- Mostly no clear differentiation between indirect and
direct discharge
- Often much more parameters are regulated
- Often the limit values are lower to much lower
- Some private organizations don’t claim that if their
limit values are higher than those of the government,
the lower limit values of the government have to be
followed->legal danger for dyehouses (e.g. pH value of
indirect or direct discharge being – exceptionally -
often more severly restricted by the law than by
private organizations)
16
Chapter 4Effluent management in the textile industry
Compensation
processes
Substance
separating processes
Substancedestructing
processes
Combined
processes
Effluent cleaning methods
(end of pipe)
Generally accepted
rulesof technology
State of art State of science
Effluent cleaning – Survey of methods
17
Hydraulic compensation
Compensation of concentrations
Compensation of temperature
Compensation of pH value,
supported by flue gas
In case of ventilation:sulphur
detoxification
Quantitative
compensationQualitative compensation
� Elementary and cheap „cleaning“ step against load peaks
� Minimum equipment for every indirect discharger
� No real cleaning effect apart of partial sedimentation of suspended particles
Compensating processes (in buffer, neutralization basins and tanks
Effluent cleaning –Compensation processes
18
Substance separating and concentrating processes
Coagulation/Precipitation
(Flocculation)
Conventional inorg. coagulants
Modern inorganic coagulants
Modern organic coagulants
Adsorption and filtration
Course filtration
Adsorption/Ion exchange
Membrane filtration
Other technologies of
Substance separation
Ion pair extraction
Evaporation Freezing out
Emulsion separation
Foaming out
Cheap Universal For indirect discharge Much sludge generation
Expensive Direct discharge Recycling
Less importantfor textile industry
Effluent cleaning – separating processes
19
Substance destructive processes
Oxidative processes:
Aerobic biology Chemical oxidation (e.g. ozone)
Chemical oxidation with pressure(wet oxidation)
Reductive processes:
Inaerobic biology
Chemical reduction- sulphur based
- sulphur free
Simultaneous oxidative
and reductive processes:
Electrocoagulation
Aerobic biology: good COD reduction but poor decolorization
Chemical oxidation:
Only for decolorization and cracking of persistent
components
Wet oxidation: Total mineralization
Anaerobic biology always
combined withaerobic biology; since no
mineralization but crackingof persistent components
Reduction only useful for
Decolorization and removal ofHeavy metal ions
Combines oxidative,reductive and flocculation/
flotation processes
Well modularly expendable (eg by membrane filtration) for
waste water recycling/reuse
Effluent cleaning – Destructive processes
20
Combination of processes
Best state of art for
- Direct discharge
- Recycling of effluent
Basic Scheme
1. Compensating processes
2. Substance destructing processes
3. Substance separating processes(polish steps)
Effluent cleaning – combined processes
21
Recycling of waste water mix
Recycling methods(intermediate position)
Recycling of partial flowwaste water
Reuse of low contaminated rinsing liquors
Reuse of treating liquors
End of pipe effluent clearing
Production integrated methods
of reduction of waste water
E
co
n
om
y
F
le
x
ib
i
l
i
t
y
Types of processes foreffluent recycling
22
New dyes, auxiliaries:
Dyes with optimized degrees of fixation
Use of ecotoxicologically best dyes, auxiliaries, chemicals and recipes for the individual application;
as far as no inherent technical and economical disadvantages
New/improved finishing processes:
Plasma pretreatment without water (GRINP, IT)
Pretreatment for better dyestuff fixation
Dyeing at low liquor ratio
Combination of preparation/dyeing and finishing in one bath
Dyeing systems free of water-CO2 fabric dyeing (DYCOO, NL)- Digital yarn dyeing (TWINE, IL)
Optimized aftersoaping and –rinsing processes“
Substitution of inecological processes
Production integrated measures of
waste water reduction;
example. dyeing
Production integrated methods
23
Ideal waste water concept
24
25
Questions & Answers
Please get in direct contact for further information: