efficacy of ftir analysis in determining co2 loading on

26
48th International Conference on Environmental Systems July 2018, Albuquerque, NM 1 Roger Huang – KBR Wyle/ NASA ARC Mark Silveria – KBR Wyle/ NASA ARC Jessica Kong – KBR Wyle/ NASA ARC Grace Belancik – NASA ARC Darrell Jan – NASA ARC Efficacy of FTIR Analysis in Determining CO 2 Loading on Diglycolamine ICES Paper 2018-262

Upload: others

Post on 30-Nov-2021

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

48th International Conference on Environmental Systems July 2018, Albuquerque, NM 1

Roger Huang – KBR Wyle/ NASA ARC

Mark Silveria – KBR Wyle/ NASA ARC

Jessica Kong – KBR Wyle/ NASA ARC

Grace Belancik – NASA ARC

Darrell Jan – NASA ARC

Efficacy of FTIR Analysis in Determining CO2 Loading on Diglycolamine

ICES Paper 2018-262

Outline

• Liquid amine background

• Microgravity adaptation

• FTIR motivation

• Experimental Method

• pH Desorption

• FTIR Analysis/ Calibration

• Results

• Discussion

48th International Conference on Environmental Systems July 2018, Albuquerque, NM 2

Liquid Amine Background

• Industrial plant gas sweetening (H2S, CO2 removal)

• Liquid amine systems used in submarines since the 1950s• Monoethanolamine (MEA) scrubbers

• Maintained CO2 concentration at 1% of the atmosphere

• Advantages over solid sorbent bed systems• Power and volume savings

• Potential usage in human spaceflight• JSC evaluation of various liquid amines in FY16

48th International Conference on Environmental Systems July 2018, Albuquerque, NM 3

48th International Conference on Environmental Systems July 2018, Albuquerque, NM 4

Liquid Amine Background

Typical CO2 removal plant process diagram

Gravity-dependent design

48th International Conference on Environmental Systems July 2018, Albuquerque, NM 5

Microgravity Adaptation

Goal: design a liquid amine-based CO2 capture system that can operate in microgravity

• Contactor designs for adsorbing and desorbing• Captured liquid flow• CO2 mass flux• Separation of gas and liquid

48th International Conference on Environmental Systems July 2018, Albuquerque, NM 6

Microgravity Adaptation

Adsorb vs Degas (regeneration) mechanics for Diglycolamine (DGA)• Tasks split between JSC and ARC

Focal points for ARC:• Degas rate

• Temperature• Surface Area• Liquid Flowrate (contact time)• CO2 loading• H2O concentration

48th International Conference on Environmental Systems July 2018, Albuquerque, NM 7

Degasser Design

Liquid Input

Liquid Output

V-channel

Instrumentation Ports

Glass V-tube

Goal: Design a scaled-down v-channel contactor that facilitates characterization of DGA degas mechanics

48th International Conference on Environmental Systems July 2018, Albuquerque, NM 8

Degasser Design

𝜃 ≈ 2.3°

DGA sampling batch 3-headed flask

Sample Port

Infrared Lamp ≈ 5.5” away from V-tube(directed at the side of the V-tube)

Peristaltic Pump

1/8” OD hose1/8” OD hose

Pre-heat input DGAThermocouples

Continuous flow sampling

48th International Conference on Environmental Systems July 2018, Albuquerque, NM 9

FTIR Motivation

How do we measure CO2 loading in the DGA?• Solution pH level• Viscosity• Raman Spectroscopy• Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

• MEA CO2 loading (Einbu, Aslak, et al., 2012)• pH desorption method (Rogers, Tanya, et al., 2017)

• “Acid desorption” “Acid Test”• 96%-98% CO2 recovery (Zhou, Shan, et al., 2010)

pH desorption requires ~1mL of solutionFTIR can potentially only require ~100µL

48th International Conference on Environmental Systems July 2018, Albuquerque, NM 10

FTIR Procedure

Buck Scientific demountable IR window liquid cell• 4mm ZnSe crystal windows• 0.015mm sample spacer• Samples loaded with luer lock

gastight syringe• Entire window disassembled

and cleaned with DI water and isopropanol between sample analysis runs

48th International Conference on Environmental Systems July 2018, Albuquerque, NM 11

FTIR Procedure

Mattson Galaxy 6020 FTIR using WinFIRST v2.10• Transmittance collected at 10kHz• Wavenumbers 400 – 4000 cm-1

• Resolution = 4

Spectragryph V1.1.0• Baselines and pre-loaded calibration

standards• Experimental samples normalized on peak

at 894 cm-1

• Peak that remained consistent in all samples of DGA

48th International Conference on Environmental Systems July 2018, Albuquerque, NM 12

FTIR Calibration

48th International Conference on Environmental Systems July 2018, Albuquerque, NM 13

FTIR Calibration

Calibrate against pH desorption for range of CO2 % loading on DGA

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

%C

O2

Exposure time to CO2 (minutes)

pH Desorption of Standards

Pure DGA

Aqueous DGA

48th International Conference on Environmental Systems July 2018, Albuquerque, NM 14

FTIR Calibration

Calibration points for DGA run at various concentrations of water solution (0%, 4%, and 8%)

48th International Conference on Environmental Systems July 2018, Albuquerque, NM 15

Results

Initial baseline – pure DGA, 85°C, ~0.4mL/min flowrate, continuous flow sampling, no sweep gas

48th International Conference on Environmental Systems July 2018, Albuquerque, NM 16

Results

Modified baseline – pure DGA, 85°C, ~0.8mL/min flowrate, continuous flow sampling, no sweep gas

48th International Conference on Environmental Systems July 2018, Albuquerque, NM 17

Results

Discoloration of evaporated (and re-condensed) DGA

48th International Conference on Environmental Systems July 2018, Albuquerque, NM 18

Results

Experimental – pure DGA, 105°C, ~0.8mL/min, continuous flow sampling, no sweep gas

48th International Conference on Environmental Systems July 2018, Albuquerque, NM 19

Results

Baseline – pure DGA, 85°C, ~0.8mL/min, continuous flow sampling, no sweep gas

48th International Conference on Environmental Systems July 2018, Albuquerque, NM 20

Results

Experimental – pure DGA, 85°C, ~0.8mL/min, continuous flow sampling, 400mL/min N2 sweep gas

48th International Conference on Environmental Systems July 2018, Albuquerque, NM 21

Results

Experimental – 35% H2O + 65% DGA, 85°C, ~0.8mL/min, continuous flow sampling, no sweep gas

48th International Conference on Environmental Systems July 2018, Albuquerque, NM 22

Discussion and Current/Future Work

Moderate success using FTIR spectroscopy to analyze CO2 % loading on DGA• Repeatability• Reducing sampling volume

35% H2O + 65% DGA solution• Single pass flow• Scaling up• Bubbling• Re-capturing evaporated H2O and DGA

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to the team at JSC, especially Tanya Rogers and Giraldo Alvarez, who provided valuable insights and inputs throughout the experimental testing process.

48th International Conference on Environmental Systems July 2018, Albuquerque, NM 23

48th International Conference on Environmental Systems July 2018, Albuquerque, NM 24

Backup Slides

48th International Conference on Environmental Systems July 2018, Albuquerque, NM 25

Microgravity Adaptation

Potential design solution: “V-channel” direct air contactor

48th International Conference on Environmental Systems July 2018, Albuquerque, NM 26

𝜃 ≈ 2.3°

DGA sampling batch 3-headed flask

Sample Port

Infrared Lamp ≈ 5.5” away from V-tube(directed at the side of the V-tube)

Peristaltic Pump

1/8” OD hose1/8” OD hose

Pre-heat input DGAThermocouples

Degasser Design

Single-pass flow sampling