effects of vertical mixing on phytoplankton blooms in xiangxi bay of three gorges reservoir:...
TRANSCRIPT
ww.sciencedirect.com
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 6 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 2 1 2 1e2 1 3 0
Available online at w
journal homepage: www.elsevier .com/locate/watres
Effects of vertical mixing on phytoplankton blooms in XiangxiBay of Three Gorges Reservoir: Implications for management
Liu Liu a, Defu Liu a,*, David M. Johnson b, Zhongqiang Yi a, Yuling Huang a
aEngineering Research Center of Eco-Environment in TGR Region, Ministry of Education, College of Hydraulic & Environmental Engineering,
China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, Chinab School of Natural Science & Mathematics, Ferrum College, VA 24088-9000, USA
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 23 August 2011
Received in revised form
5 January 2012
Accepted 23 January 2012
Available online 31 January 2012
Keywords:
Eutrophication
Phytoplankton succession
Mixing depth
Thermal stratification
Density current
Water level fluctuations
* Corresponding author. Tel.: þ86 (0) 7176392E-mail address: [email protected] (D. Liu
0043-1354/$ e see front matter ª 2012 Elsevdoi:10.1016/j.watres.2012.01.029
a b s t r a c t
Since the initial filling of Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR), serious phytoplankton blooms have
occurred in its tributary bays. Cyanobacteria blooms have been observed in a number of
tributary bays and threaten the drinking water security of residents in the TGR region. To
identify the key factors controlling phytoplankton blooms in tributary bays and propose an
effective management strategy, a one-year water quality study (November 2009 to October
2010) was conducted in Xiangxi Bay (XXB) of TGR. The results show that a rapid decrease in
mixing depth is associated with the spring bloom, fading of the fall bloom occurs with the
rapid increase in mixing depth, and an extremely shallow mixing depth is associated with
cyanobacteria blooms that predominate during the summer. Development of thermal
stratification in XXB is the major cause of seasonal variation in mixing depth and density
current intrusion from TGR is the major cause of short-term variation in mixing depth. The
seasonal thermal stratification of XXB is disrupted by sufficiently large water level fluc-
tuations in TGR. The density current is lifted from mid-depths to the surface and chloro-
phyll a concentrations rapidly decrease in response. Based on these findings, a conceptual
model is proposed for a management strategy to control phytoplankton blooms in tributary
bays via controlled releases from TGR.
ª 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction Numerous investigations of phytoplankton blooms in the
Since the initial filling of Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR) in June
2003, intense phytoplankton blooms have been observed in
some tributary backwaters. Both the frequency of phyto-
plankton blooms and the numbers of tributaries involved
increased as the normal high water level shifted upwards
(Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, 2011). Serious
cyanobacteria blooms have been observed in a number of
tributaries (Ministry of Environmental Protection of China,
2011), threatening the drinking water security of residents in
the TGR region.
100.).ier Ltd. All rights reserved
tributary bays of TGR have been conducted. Nutrient levels in
TGR are high and difficult to control because nitrogen and
phosphorus loading of several major tributaries above the
Three Gorges Dam come mainly from non-point source
pollution (Zheng et al., 2009). Minimum values of total
nitrogen and total phosphorusmeasured in TGRwere 0.80 and
0.07mg/L, respectively (Zhou et al., 2011). Intrusions from TGR
maintain high nutrient levels in tributary bays (Luo et al., 2007;
Ji et al., 2010) and nutrients are not the limiting factor for
phytoplankton blooms (Xu et al., 2010a). Xu (Xu et al., 2010b)
identified water temperature as the driving factor of spring
.
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 6 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 2 1 2 1e2 1 3 02122
blooms in Xiangxi Bay (XXB). However, intense cyanobacteria
blooms were observed in other tributary bays of TGR even
during the winter (Cao et al., 2009) and evidence that
temperature is the primary driver of spring blooms in tribu-
tary bays is not convincing. Li and Liao (Li and Liao, 2003)
concluded that decreased flow in TGR tributaries is the
primary driver for phytoplankton blooms. Seasonal thermal
stratification is strongly developed in TGR bays but weak in
TGR. These different hydrological conditions explain the lack
of phytoplankton blooms in TGR and the frequent blooms in
its tributary bays (Wang et al., 2011a).
The Critical Depth Model proposed by Sverdrup (Sverdrup,
1953) emphasizes that a decreasedmixing depth promotes the
onset of spring blooms in the ocean and this concept has been
applied to freshwaters. Seasonal development and disap-
pearance of temperature stratification in lakes result in
seasonal deepening of mixing depth and stimulate seasonal
onset and succession of phytoplankton blooms (Berger et al.,
2007; Fonseca and Bicudo, 2008). The ratio of euphotic depth
(Zeu) to mixing depth (Zmix) is often used as a measure of
illumination in the mixed layer (Jensen et al., 1994). Cushing
(Cushing, 1989) has succeeded in predicting seasonal succes-
sion of phytoplankton in Lake Ontario using Zeu/Zmix. A
phytoplankton bloom will generally not occur if Zeu/Zmix is
lower than the “critical value” (Scheffer et al., 1997).
Mixing depth of oceans and lakes generally depends on
thermal stratification and wind-induced circulation (Farmer
and Carmack, 1981; Kling, 1988). Yi (Yi et al., 2009) reported
significantwater temperaturestratification inXXBduringspring
and summer but the density current in XXB (Ji et al., 2010a)may
modify the natural condition because the layer receiving the
density current intrusion is well mixed. When an overflow
occurs, there is a sudden increase in mixing depth; plunging
depth of the density current may be an important determinant
of mixing depth in XXB. Research (Ji et al., 2010b) indicates that
the continuing increase ofwater level in TGRduring the late fall
impoundment period influences plunging depth of the density
current. Nonetheless, discharge restrictions are created by the
need forwaterdownstreamfromTGRduring thedry seasonand
the need for a pre-flood season drawdown of TGR. Thus,
increases in the long-term water level are limited and leave
short-term manipulation of water level as the only acceptable
hydrological option for controlling phytoplankton blooms. In
this study, the feasibility of using temporary water level fluctu-
ations in TGR to change plunging depth and Zeu/Zmix to exert
control on phytoplankton blooms in XXB is investigated.
Because of an incomplete understanding of phytoplankton
bloom mechanisms in the tributary bays of TGR, a practical
management strategy has not been developed. Resolving
phytoplankton bloom problems in tributary bays of TGR by
controlling nutrient loads can only be a long-term goal
because the TGR watershed is very large (1 million km2)
(Huang and Li, 2006). A practical measure for short-time (and
emergency) control of phytoplankton blooms is needed. The
goal of this research was to gain a fuller understanding of the
phytoplankton bloom mechanisms by studying the vertical
mixing regimes of XXB and the response of phytoplankton
blooms in XXB to transitory water level fluctuations in TGR. A
management strategy for phytoplankton blooms in tributary
bays is recommended based on the results.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Study area description and sampling methods
Xiangxi River, the largest tributary in the lower reach of TGR,
has a watershed area of 3095 km2, length of 94 km and annual
average flow 47.4 m3/s (Huang and Li, 2006). It originates in
Shennongjia National Park located in northwest Hubei Prov-
ince, and flows southward through Xingshan and Zigui
Counties and into TGR at Xiangxi Town (32 km from Three
Gorges Dam). After initial impoundment of TGR in June 2003 to
water level of 135 m, a deep riverine bay formed in XXB as the
lower 26 km were submerged by backwater; the backwater
reach extended to 40 km when the reservoir was filling to
normal water level (175 m) in October 2010. The sampling site
is located at the middle reach of XXB and 19 km from the
confluence of XXB and TGR (Fig. 1) because it receives small
direct impacts from TGR and upstream inflow. Depth of this
site varies between 19 and 49 m in response to water level
fluctuations of TGR throughout a year. Daily sampling was
conducted from November 2009 to October 2010.
Water level and discharge data were provided by China
Three Gorges Corporation. The TGR operational cycle can be
divided into four stages according to water level and discharge
(Fig. 2): dry season (November to April), drawdown (May to
early June), flood season (June to August) and impoundment
(September to October). Wind speed and direction data were
collectedusinga continuouswindspeedanddirectionrecorder
(ZDR-1F, China) fixed on the platform located at the middle
reachofXXB.The instrumentwasoperatedat a 1minsampling
interval. Secchi Depth (SD) was measured using a Secchi Disk
and Photosynthesis Active Radiation (PAR, 400e700 nm) was
measured by an underwater illuminometer (IL1400A, China).
Surfacewater samples (350mL)were collectedand transported
to the laboratory for chlorophyll a concentration (Chl. a) anal-
ysis using the national standard method (Wang et al., 2002).
Additional surface water samples (1 L) were collected for
phytoplankton identification and enumeration (Olympus
microscope, Japan; ShinesoAlgacount,China) and thedatawas
expressed as phytoplankton density (cells/L).
Simultaneous profiles of velocity and water quality were
measured from a boat equipped with an Acoustic Doppler
Vector velocimeter (ADV; Nortek, Norway) and a Hydrolab DS
5X multi-probe sonde (Hach, USA). Parameters profiled
included depth, water temperature and turbidity. Vertical
resolution of the measurements was 1 m. Using the method
proposed by Ma (Ma et al., 2011), flow velocities in east (Ve),
north (Vn) and vertical (Vu) directions were measured at
depths of 0.5 and 2 m and then to the bottom at 2 m intervals.
2.2. Data analysis
Zeu is generally calculated as the corresponding depth where
underwater PAR is 1% of the surface (Kirk, 1994). A linear
regression formula between Zeu and SD was obtained using
the underwater PAR in 2010 (Zeu ¼ 1.8021SD þ 1.8182,
R2 ¼ 0.8404) to calculate Zeu. The depth corresponding to
surface temperature gradient � 0.2 �C/m (Lawrence et al.,
2000) was computed as Zmix in this study.
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 6 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 2 1 2 1e2 1 3 0 2123
Layer depths of density currents were computed using
a set of moments with the upper limit of the underflow taken
as the zero velocity line for the integration (Garcıa et al., 2007).
The same method was applied to calculate layer depth and
depth of the interface of overflows and interflows.
Squared buoyancy frequency (N2) was computed using the
formula:
N2 ¼ ðg=r0Þðdr=dzÞ (1)
Where g is the gravitational acceleration ( g ¼ 9.8092597m/s2),
r0 is the water density at 3.98 �C and z is water depth using
water surface as origin of coordinates and vertical downwards
as positive direction.
Richardson number (Ri) was computed using the formula:
Ri ¼ N2=ðdU=dzÞ2 (2)
Where N2 is squared buoyancy frequency, U is synthesized by
Ve and Vn.
3. Results
3.1. Seasonal variations of euphotic depth and mixingdepth
Fig. 3 displays water depth (H), Zeu, Zmix, and Zeu/Zmix in
XXB during the study period. Zeu was larger than 5 m from
November 2009 to March 2010 and October 2010 but less
Fig. 1 e Map of study area and sampling site (areas submerged
and the areas submerged at an impoundment elevation of 175
interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, t
than 5 m in other months. The maximum value was
8.20 m in October and the minimum 2.87 m in August.
The seasonal cycling of Zmix in XXB was extreme with
mixing depth nearly to the bottom in January, decreasing
rapidly in April to a minimum of 1.08 m in August, and then
increasing again in the fall. The seasonal variation of Zeu/Zmix
was also large. During the winter dry season (November 2009
to March 2010), Zeu/Zmix was small (0.14e0.21) and began to
increase rapidly in April, peaking in May (1.77) and again in
August (2.66). Because seasonal variation of Zeu (2.87e8.20 m)
was much less than that of Zmix (1.94e39.04), the seasonal
variation of Zeu/Zmix was driven primarily by seasonal varia-
tion of Zmix.
3.2. Factors controlling euphotic depth and mixing depth
3.2.1. Factors influencing euphotic depthCorrelation of Zeu with turbidity and Chl. a is shown in Fig. 4.
The nonlinear correlation coefficient is higher than the linear,
and Chl. a (phytoplankton biomass) has the larger influence
on Zeu.
3.2.2. Influence of temperature stratification and wind onmixing depthFig. 5a indicates that temperature stratification in XXB began
in April, was strongest in August and began to diminish in
September. As shown in Fig. 5b, the velocity profiles of XXB in
winter (February) were extremely disordered and the flow
velocity very low (�0.06e0.02 m/s). In August the velocity
at an impoundment elevation of 145 m are tinted light blue
m are tinted green; isohypse resolution is 5 m). (For
he reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 2 e TGR operational cycle: water level and inflow
discharge curve.
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 6 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 2 1 2 1e2 1 3 02124
profile was stratified and indicates an interflow. The middle
layer (3e18 m) flowed into the bay while water flowed out of
the bay from the surface and bottom with a maximum
velocity of 0.13 m/s at the bottom.
Fig. 5c displays N2 and Ri profiles during weak temperature
stratification in winter (February 1, 2010) and strong temper-
ature stratification in summer (August 2, 2010). In February
2010, N2 of the water column ranged only from �5 � 10�5 to
2 � 10�4, displaying an increase from 30 m to the river bed. In
August 2010,N2 of thewater column ranged from 0 to 4� 10�3,
with large gradients in the surface and bottom layers and near
0 in the middle layer (12e22 m). In winter, temperature
stratification was weak and vertical stability low and, in
summer, temperature stratification was strong and vertical
stability high. In August, the low value of N2 in the middle
layer implies vertical stability was very low. This was a result
of the density current plunging into to middle layer and
consistent with the temperature profile in Fig. 5a and the
velocity profile in Fig. 5b.
In February 2010, the Ri profile (Fig. 5c) indicates low,
uniform values, until near the bottom. Below 27 m, there was
a sharp increase in Ri, exceeding 1 below 31m. In August, Ri for
theentirewater column inXXBranged from0.59 to188.21.With
the exception of the minimum value (0.59) occurring at the
bottom,Riwereall larger than1,withamaximumvalueat15m.
Both the Ri profile and N2 profile suggest that vertical
mixing in the upper 30 m in XXB was strong in winter
(February) and restrained in the summer (August) and that
turbulence was significantly lower in summer than in winter.
The peak value of Ri (15 m) and the minimum N2 values
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0 0
10
20
30
40
50
Zeu
/Zm
ix
Dep
th (
m)
Time (YY/MM/DD)
Zeu Zmix H Zeu/Zmix
Fig. 3 e Seasonal variations of depth (H), Zeu, Zmix and Zeu/
Zmix in XXB during the study period.
(12e22 m) indicate that the density current plunged into XXB
as a laminar flow.
3.2.3. Influence of density current on mixing depthSeasonal variation in plunging depth of the density current
was found to occur because of seasonal change of tempera-
ture stratification in XXB (Ji et al., 2010a). Within the density
current, physico-chemical properties are uniform and density
current plunges alter the physical and chemical properties of
the corresponding layer of XXB. Fig. 6 indicates the effect of
TGR intrusion on temperature stratification and Zmix in XXB
over 10 days (August 22e31, 2010). There were continuing
density currents in XXB during this period (flood season).
From August 22e24 the density currents were thin interflows,
plunging close to the surface (4.44e5.93 m). The density
currents changed to overflows August 25e29 with increased
thickness (19.14e22.50 m) and then changed back to an
interflow again on August 30 as thickness and plunging depth
decreased (9.52e12.10 m).
Fig. 6b shows that temperature stratification in XXB was
affected by the intrusions. When plunging depth of density
current changed, the temperature profile at the corresponding
depth was altered. For example, the interflow produced two
inflections in the temperature profile from August 22e24, but,
from August 25e29, water temperature at the surface was
approximately uniform as a result of the intrusion rising from
the middle layer to the surface.
Fig. 6c shows the upper and lower interfaces of the density
current and their depths relative to Zeu and Zmix. When the
interflow occurred from August 22e24, Zmix was shallow and
decreasing (5.60/2.23 m). Following the transition of the
intrusion from the middle layer to the surface on August 25,
there was a large increase in Zmix and it approached the lower
interface and increased with density current thickness from
August 25e29. On August 30, the intrusion plunged to the
middle layer again, but Zmix still reached to the lower interface
of the density current because of incomplete development of
surface temperature stratification. Zmix then declined sharply
and returned to above the upper interface of interflow until
the temperature stratification was fully developed on August
31. Variation of Zeu was small from August 22e31, implying
that the influence of intrusions is slight (2.72e3.26 m during
interflow, 2.72e3.17 m during overflow). The results indicate
that plunging depth of the density current exerts a strong
influence on Zmix but little influence on Zeu. When the intru-
sion rises to the surface, there is a large increase in Zmix and,
when the intrusion sinks to an interflow, there is a lag time in
the resulting decline in Zmix as thermal stratification is re-
established.
Fig. 6d shows how the Chl. a level in XXB changes in
response to water level daily fluctuation (WLDF) in TGR during
late August. The water level of TGR increased each day from
August 22e27 and the WLDF peaked at 3.8 m/d on August 25.
The WLDF then decreased, becoming negative on August 28.
The large increase in WLDF produced a rapid decrease in Zeu/
Zmix and had a dramatic impact on the phytoplankton
community; as WLDF peaked, Chl. a levels crashed. The rapid
decline of Chl. a is attributed to disruption of the normal
temperature stratification caused by the uplift of plunging
depth (Fig. 6a, b, c).
Fig. 4 e Correlation of Zeu with turbidity and Chl. a.
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 6 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 2 1 2 1e2 1 3 0 2125
3.3. Effects of vertical mixing on seasonal variation ofChl. a and phytoplankton succession
Fig. 7a shows the seasonal variation of Chl. a from April to
August, indicating peaks in May and August and low levels
from November to the following February (0.15e1.88 mg/m3).
Values of Zeu/Zmix and Chl. a were both low fromNovember to
Fig. 5 e Temperature stratification, flow velocity, and vertical st
indicate flow into the bay and the negative values indicate flow
February and intense phytoplankton blooms were associated
with rapid increases of Zeu/Zmix during spring and summer.
Fig. 7b displays the seasonal succession of phytoplankton
and the succession was associated with changes in the
vertical mixing regime. Diatoms and green algae predomi-
nated in spring and cyanobacteria in summer with a brief
dinoflagellate bloom in June produced by a sudden increase of
ability in XXB. For the flow velocity profiles, positive values
out of the bay.
Fig. 6 e Influence of density currents on temperature stratification and Zmix and influence of water level daily fluctuation
(WLDF) in TGR on Chl. a in XXB. a. White arrows indicate flow into XXB and black arrows indicate flow out of XXB; b.
variations of water temperature profile in response to changes of plunging depth of density current; c. Hupper indicates upper
interface of density current, Hlower indicates the lower; d. positive value of WLDF indicates rise of water level and negative
values a fall of water level.
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 6 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 2 1 2 1e2 1 3 02126
0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Zeu
/Zm
ix
Chl
. a (
mg/
m3 )
Chl.a Zeu/Zmix
a
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Time (YY/MM/DD)
Dinoflagellate Diatom Green algae Cyanobacteria The othersb
Fig. 7 e Influence of Zeu/Zmix on Chl. a and seasonal
succession in phytoplankton composition. a. Seasonal
variations of Chl. a and Zeu/Zmix; b. seasonal succession of
phytoplankton composition.
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 6 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 2 1 2 1e2 1 3 0 2127
Zmix. Variations of phytoplankton biomass and succession
were both associated with seasonal deepening of Zmix and
a predictive model for phytoplankton blooms can be
developed.
4. Discussion
Light extinction by water varies with wavelength. Shorter
wavelengths are absorbed near the surface and longer wave-
lengths penetrate to deeper water (Wetzel, 2001). The atten-
uation of light by lake water results from two factors:
scattering by suspended particles and absorption by phyto-
plankton. Scattering only changes direction of light propaga-
tion so the attenuation of light underwater is primarily due to
absorption by phytoplankton (Scheffer, 2004). The results in
XXB confirm previous studies; in turbid waters, the under-
water light attenuation coefficient was found to be closely
correlated with turbidity (Oliver et al., 2000). However, it
should be noticed (Fig. 3) that the turbidity of XXB water was
generally less than 10 NTU with a low average (5.54 NTU) and
the average Chl. a was relatively high (26.55 mg/m3). This
means phytoplankton growth is free from light limitation
caused by high turbidity in XXB.
A surface layer of water is created by seasonal temperature
stratification and it is thenmixed by wind that produces shear
forces on the surface. However, wind-induced mixing of the
surface layer increases Zmix and the increase depends onwind
speed and fetch (Tucker and Green, 1977). During this inves-
tigation the maximum wind speed was 7.2 m/s, the mean
wind speed was 2.5 m/s, and seasonal variation was not
significant. The influence of winds on Zmix of XXB is small
because XXB is narrow and winding with fetches always less
than 2 km. N2 reflects the change of density gradient along
vertical and Ri represents the relative buoyancy and inertial
force often used as measures of vertical stability and
turbulence of water (Holford and Linden, 1999). Vertical
turbulence is restrained when Ri > 0 (Omstedt and Murthy,
1994). When Ri > 1, vertical turbulence is completely
restrained and flow is laminar (Miles, 1986; Stull, 1988) and
when Ri < 0.25, laminar flow changes to turbulent flow
(Stewart, 2008). The results displayed in Fig. 5 indicate that
seasonal development of temperature stratification is the
main cause for the variations in vertical stability and turbu-
lence and intrusions can modify vertical structure of normal
stratification.
Thermal stratification and the accompanying decrease in
Zmix are known to cause the seasonal onset of phytoplankton
blooms (Sverdrup, 1953) and the seasonal succession of
phytoplankton (Lindenschmidt and Chorus, 1998). The find-
ings in XXB support the conclusions of previous studies.
Vertical mixing is suppressed when the water column is
strongly stratified and nutrients are depleted in the euphotic
zone (Sommer, 1985). When Zmix is larger than Zeu, algae are
carried out ofZeu bymixing and light limitations occur. Intense
phytoplankton blooms are frequently observed when Zeu/
Zmix¼ 1 if nutrients arenot limiting.A critical value forZeu/Zmix
was defined in the development of critical depth theory. Light
limitation will occur if Zeu/Zmix is lower than the critical value.
By integrating the equation of daily photosynthesis and
respiration rate of phytoplankton along mixing depth, Talling
(Talling, 1957) obtained the value of 0.30. A range of 0.20e0.35
for critical valuewas reportedbyOliver (Oliver et al., 2000), that
accounts for seasonal variation in length of day and sun angle.
There is significant difference of duration of daylight between
winter and summer becauseXXB is located in subtropical zone
and the critical value range of 0.20e0.35 is appropriate for XXB
(0.35 from late fall to early spring and 0.20 from late spring to
early fall). The corresponding values for Chl. a and Zeu/Zmix
displayed in Fig. 7a confirm the validity of using this range for
the critical value in XXB. The results support Sverdrup’s Crit-
ical Depth Theory (Sverdrup, 1953). Controlled releases from
TGR could potentially be used to disrupt cyanobacteria blooms
because cyanobacteria are particularly sensitive to variations
in Zmix (Huisman et al., 2004).
Previous studies (Kuang et al., 2004, 2005) on phyto-
plankton composition showed that diatoms and green algae
were the dominant phytoplankton species (approximately
80% for total) before and after the initial filling in June 2003 to
water level of 135 m. The results in XXB show this trend is
persistent. Diatoms and green algae are still the most
common phytoplankton species in XXB; Cyclotella sp., Melosira
sp. and Synedra sp. are the most frequently observed diatoms
and Chlorella sp. and Chlamydomonas sp. are the most
frequently observed green algae. After the initial filling, Peri-
diniopsis sp. and Cyclotella sp. were the predominant species
and produce serious spring blooms while no single species
was observed to predominate before filling (Kuang et al., 2005).
The spring blooms predominated by Peridiniopsis sp. and
Cyclotella sp.were observed in tributary bays of TGR every year
since filling (Cai and Hu, 2006) and the diel vertical migration
of Peridiniopsis sp. has been the subject of several investiga-
tions (Xu et al., 2010c; Yang et al., 2010a). Dinoflagellates were
limited primarily to a single species (Peridiniopsis sp.) in this
study, however, they were replaced by the green algae in
spring blooms. Serious cyanobacteria blooms (Microcystis
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 6 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 2 1 2 1e2 1 3 02128
aeruginosa) were observed in XXB for the first time in summer
2008 (Wang et al., 2009) after the second impoundment to
water level of 156 m in October 2006. Then cyanobacteria
blooms (Anabaena sp.) were found in XXB in summer 2010 as
a part of seasonal phytoplankton succession. The phyto-
plankton communities in TGR tributary bays are evolving year
by year since the recent completion of TGR (October 26, 2010).
However, the seasonal cycle of phytoplankton and yearly
cyanobacteria blooms in summer indicate the ecosystem of
the bays is stabilizing. To better understand developing
ecosystem of this large new reservoir, phytoplankton data
should be collected continuously in the future.
Significant differences in vertical mobility among phyto-
plankton species leads to predictable phytoplankton succes-
sion with seasonal change in vertical mixing conditions. Non-
buoyant algae, such as diatoms, predominate when strong
mixing and turbulence occur (Happey, 1970). Algae with
flagella or pseudo-vacuoles predominate when water is ther-
mally stratified (Baker and Brook, 1971; Reynolds, 1972). Cya-
nobacteria regulate buoyancy via pseudo-vacuoles and
descend to absorb nutrients and ascend to absorb PAR
(Kromkamp and Walsby, 1990). When Zmix is small, diatoms
sink below the mixed layer and are replaced by cyanobacteria
(Huisman et al., 2004). This is illustrated by the fact that
Anabaena sp. predominated in August when Zeu/Zmix
increased to its peak annual value (2.66) in XXB.
A large number of studies suggested that eutrophication of
lakes and reservoirs should be addressed by controlling and
reducing inputs of phosphorus and nitrogen (Schindler et al.,
2008; Conley et al., 2009). As noted earlier, this is feasible
only in the long term in TGR. Alternative approaches, such as
the use of artificial mixing to control cyanobacteria blooms by
increasing Zmix has been proposed (Visser et al., 1996; Imteaz
and Asaeda, 2000) based on knowledge of the response of
phytoplankton growth to Zeu/Zmix. However, the techniques
used in these investigations are expensive to apply on a large
scale. The effects of water level fluctuation on water quality in
reservoirs have been widely investigated. Based on these
results, water level management has been proposed as a tool
to control phytoplankton blooms (Coops and Hosper, 2002;
Naselli-Flores and Barone, 2005; Paillisson and Marion, 2010).
Zhou (Zhou, 2008) was the first to propose that water level
fluctuations in TGR, produced by reservoir operation, could be
used to control phytoplankton blooms in its bays.Wang (Wang
et al., 2011b) found that Zmix in XXB is sensitive to large water
level fluctuations of TGR. Previous studies during post-flood
season (fall) indicate that a continuous rise of water level in
TGR can effectively reduce the degree and the area of phyto-
plankton blooms (Ji et al., 2010b; Yang et al., 2010b). However,
the hydrodynamic conditions during impoundment are
exceptional and cannot be easily extended to the other periods.
The three-day rise in water level lifted the density current
from the middle layer to the surface and the overflow thick-
ness increased due to the continuously rising water level and
the intrusion remained at the surface for two days after water
level began to fall. The response of phytoplankton biomass in
XXB towater level fluctuations of TGR indicates good potential
for controlling phytoplankton blooms in tributary bays by
appropriate control of TGR discharge. However, the large
water level fluctuation in August resulted from retention of
a flood peak and it is unrealistic to apply a WLDF of 3.8 m/d as
an operational criterion. The response relationship between
water level fluctuations in TGR and phytoplankton blooms in
its tributary bays was discussed based on available field data,
but a quantitative relationship has not yet been developed. To
implement a hydrodynamic approach for controlling phyto-
plankton blooms, an eco-hydrodynamic model coupling
temperature, silt and nutrients must be developed and the
existing dataset must be extended in order to develop the
quantitative response of temperature stratification (and Zmix)
to water level fluctuation. Management rules for controlling
phytoplankton blooms in tributaries through water level
management in TGR (minimumWLDF, duration of water level
rise, etc.) can then be integrated into an optimal operational
strategy that includes navigation, power generation, flood
control and water supply.
5. Conclusions
Results from one-year intensive field monitoring show that
thermal stratification is themain cause of seasonal variation of
Zmix. However, plunging depth of the density current can cause
transitory changes of Zmix. Phytoplankton growth and succes-
sion in XXB are driven primarily by variation of Zmix. Short-
term impoundment of TGR can lift the plunging depth of
density currents and interrupt temperature stratification in
XXB. This temporarily increases Zmix and causes a dramatic
decrease in the Chl. a level. Thus, water level fluctuations in
TGR provide a possible means for controlling phytoplankton
blooms in its tributary bays, particularly the cyanobacteria
blooms that threaten regional drinking water supplies.
Management rules for controlling phytoplankton blooms in
tributary bays using water level management in TGR would
necessarily be integrated into anoperational strategy including
navigation, power generation, flood control and water supply.
Acknowledgements
The authors greatly appreciate the financial support
provided by National 11th Five-Year Science & Technology
Research Plan of China (No. 2008BAB29B09), National Critical
Projects in Control and Management of Water Pollution
(No. 2008ZX07104-004) and NSFC (No. 51009080, No. 51009081,
No. 51179095 &No. 50925932).We thank Yang Zhengjian and Ji
Daobin for their good suggestions to this study. We also thank
all the members of Engineering Research Center of Eco-
Environment in TGR Region, Ministry of Education, CTGU for
participating in the field monitoring.
r e f e r e n c e s
Baker, A.L., Brook, A.J., 1971. Optical density profiles as an aid tothe study of microstratified phytoplankton populations inlakes. Archiv Fur Hydrobiologie 69 (2), 214e233.
Berger, S.A., Diehl, S., Stibor, H., Trommer, G., Ruhenstroth, M.,Wild, A., Weigert, A., Jager, C.G., Striebel, M., 2007. Water
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 6 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 2 1 2 1e2 1 3 0 2129
temperature and mixing depth affect timing and magnitude ofevents during spring succession of the plankton. Oecologia150 (4), 643e654.
Cai, Q.H., Hu, Z.Y., 2006. Studies on eutrophication problem andcontrol strategy in the Three Gorges Reservoir. ActaHydrobiologica Sinica 30 (1), 7e11 (in Chinese).
Cao, C.J., Zheng, B.H., Zhang, J.L., Huang, M.S., Chen, Z.L., 2009.Systematic investigation into winter and spring algal bloomsin Daning River of three Gorges reservoir. EnvironmentalScience 30 (12), 3471e3480 (in Chinese).
Conley, D.J., Paerl, H.W., Howarth, R.W., Boesch, D.F.,Seitzinger, S.P., Havens, K.E., Lancelot, C., Likens, G.E., 2009.Controlling eutrophication: nitrogen and phosphorus. Science(Washington) 323 (5917), 1014e1015.
Coops, H., Hosper, S.H., 2002. Water-level management as a toolfor the restoration of shallow lakes in the netherlands. LakeReservoir Management 18 (4), 293e298.
Cushing, D.H., 1989. A difference in structure between ecosystemsin strongly stratified waters and in those that are only weaklystratified. Journal of Plankton Research 11 (1), 1e13.
Farmer, D.M., Carmack, E., 1981. Wind mixing and restratificationin a lake near the temperature of maximum density. Journal ofPhysical Oceanography 11 (11), 1516e1533.
Fonseca, B.M., Bicudo, C.E.M., 2008. Phytoplankton seasonalvariation in a shallow stratified eutrophic reservoir (Gar asPond, Brazil). Hydrobiologia 600 (1), 267e282.
Garcıa, C.M., Oberg, K., Garcıa, M.H., 2007. ADCPmeasurements ofgravity currents in the Chicago River, Illinois. Journal ofHydraulic Engineering 133 (12), 1356e1366.
Happey, C.M., 1970. Some physico-chemical investigations ofstratification inAbbot’s Pool, Somerset: thedistribution of somedissolved substances. The Journal of Ecology 58 (3), 621e634.
Holford, J.M., Linden, P., 1999. Turbulentmixing in a stratified fluid.Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans 30 (2e4), 173e198.
Huang, Z.L., Li, Y.L., 2006. Water Quality Prediction and WaterEnvironmental Carrying Capacity Calculation for Three GorgesReservoir. China Waterpower Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
Huisman, J., Sharples, J., Stroom, J.M., Visser, P.M.,Kardinaal, W.E.A., Verspagen, J.M.H., Sommeijer, B., 2004.Changes in turbulent mixing shift competition for lightbetween phytoplankton species. Ecology 85 (11), 2960e2970.
Imteaz, M.A., Asaeda, T., 2000. Artificial mixing of lake water bybubble plume and effects of bubbling operations on algalbloom. Water Research 34 (6), 1919e1929.
Jensen, J.P., Jeppesen, E., Olrik, K., Kristensen, P., 1994. Impact ofnutrients and physical factors on the shift fromCyanobacterial to Chlorophyte dominance in shallow Danishlakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51(8), 1692e1699.
Ji, D.B., Liu, D.F., Yang, Z.J., Xiao, S.B., 2010a. Hydrodynamiccharacteristics of Xiangxi Bay in Three Gorges reservoir.Science China: Physica, Mechanica Astronomica 40 (1),101e112 (in Chinese).
Ji, D.B., Liu, D.F., Yang, Z.J., Yu, W., 2010b. Adverse slope densityflow and its ecological effect on the algae bloom in Xiangxi Bayof Three Gorges Reservoir during the reservoir impounding atthe end of flood season. Shuili Xuebao (Journal of HydraulicEngineering) 41 (6), 691e696 (in Chinese).
Ji, X.P., Liu, D.F., Huang, Y.L., Ji, D.B., Yi, Z.Q., 2010. Nutrientdynamics of Xiangxi Bay and converse impact of the mainstream during drainage period of the Three Gorges Reservoir.Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering 4 (12),2687e2693 (in Chinese).
Kirk, J.T.O., 1994. Light and Photosynthesis in AquaticEcosystems. Cambridge University Press.
Kling, G.W., 1988. Comparative transparency, depth of mixing,and stability of stratification in lakes of Cameroon, WestAfrica. Limnology Oceanography 33 (1), 27e40.
Kromkamp, J., Walsby, A.E., 1990. A computer model of buoyancyand vertical migration in cyanobacteria. Journal of PlanktonResearch 12 (1), 161e183.
Kuang, Q.J., Hu, Z.Y., Zhou, G.J., Ye, L., Cai, Q.H., 2004.Investigation on phytoplankton in Xiangxi River watershedand the evaluation of its water quality. Journal of WuhanBotanical Research 22 (6), 507e513 (in Chinese).
Kuang, Q.J., Bi, Y.H., Zhou, G.J., Cai, Q.H., Hu, Z.Y., 2005. Study onthe phytoplankton in the Three Gorges Reservoir before andafter sluice and the protection of water quality. ActaHydrobiologica Sinica 29 (4), 353e358 (in Chinese).
Lawrence, I., Bormans, M., Oliver, R., Ransom, G., Sherman, B.,Ford, P., Wasson, B., 2000. Physical and nutrient factorscontrolling algal succession and biomass in BurrinjuckReservoir. Technical Report, National EutrophicationManagement Program, Land Water Resources Australia.
Li, J.X., Liao, W.G., 2003. Study of the primary evoked factor ofeutrophication in the Three Gorges Reservoir. Science andTechnology Review 2, 49e52 (in Chinese).
Lindenschmidt, K.E., Chorus, I., 1998. The effect of water columnmixing on phytoplankton succession, diversity and similarity.Journal of Plankton Research 20 (10), 1927e1951.
Luo, Z.X., Zhu, B., Zheng, B.H., Zhang, Y., 2007. Nitrogen andphosphorus loadings in branch backwater reaches and thereverse effects in the main stream in Three GorgesReservoir. China Environmental Science 27 (2), 208e212(in Chinese).
Ma, J., Liu, D.F., Ji, D.B., Yang, Z.J., Yi, Z.Q., 2011. Study on flowmeasurement methods under low flow velocity conditions oftributaries in Three Gorges Reservoir. Journal of Yangtze RiverScientific Research Institute 28 (6), 30e34 (in Chinese).
Miles, J., 1986. Richardson’s criterion for the stability of stratifiedshear flow. Physics Fluids, doi:10.1063/1.865812.
Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, 2011. Bulletin onthe Ecological and Environmental Monitoring Results of theThree Gorges Project (1997e2010). The bulletin was publishedin May each year since 1997 by Ministry of EnvironmentalProtection of China, Beijing. Available at: http://english.mep.gov.cn/down_load/Documents/.
Naselli-Flores, L., Barone, R., 2005. Water-level fluctuations inMediterranean reservoirs: setting a dewatering threshold asa management tool to improve water quality. Hydrobiologia548 (1), 85e99.
Oliver, R.L., Hart, B.T., Olley, J., Grace, M., Rees, C., Caitcheon, G.,2000. The Darling River: Algal Growth and the Cycling andSources of Nutrients. Murray-Darling Basin Commission.Project M386 1999.
Omstedt, A., Murthy, C.R., 1994. On currents and vertical mixingin Lake Ontario during summer stratification. NordicHydrology 25 (3), 213e232.
Paillisson, J.M., Marion, L., 2010. Water level fluctuations formanaging excessive plant biomass in shallow lakes. EcologicalEngineering 37 (2), 241e247.
Reynolds, C.S., 1972. Growth, gas vacuolation and buoyancy ina natural population of a planktonic blue-green alga.Freshwater Biology. 2 (2), 87e106.
Scheffer, M., Rinaldi, S., Gragnani, A., Mur, L.R., van Nes, E.H.,1997. On the dominance of filamentous cyanobacteria inshallow, turbid lakes. Ecology 78 (1), 272e282.
Scheffer, M., 2004. Ecology of Shallow Lakes. Springer.Schindler, D.W., Hecky, R.E., Findlay, D.L., Stainton, M.P.,
Parker, B.R., Paterson, M.J., Beaty, K.G., Lyng, M.,Kasian, S.E.M., 2008. Eutrophication of lakes cannot becontrolled by reducing nitrogen input: results of a 37-yearwhole-ecosystem experiment. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences 105 (32), 11254e11258.
Sommer, U., 1985. Seasonal succession of phytoplankton in LakeConstance. Bioscience 35 (6), 351e357.
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 6 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 2 1 2 1e2 1 3 02130
Stewart, R.H., 2008. Introduction to Physical Oceanography. TexasA & M University.
Stull, R.B., 1988. An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology.Springer.
Sverdrup, H.U., 1953. On conditions for the vernal blooming ofphytoplankton. ICES Journal of Marine Science 18 (3), 287e295.
Talling, J., 1957. The phytoplankton population as a compoundphotosynthetic system. New Phytologist 56 (2), 133e149.
Tucker, W.A., Green, A.W., 1977. A time-dependent model of thelake-averaged, vertical temperature distribution of lakes.Limnology Oceanography 22 (4), 687e699.
Visser, P., Ibelings, B., Van Der Veer, B., Koedood, J., Mur, R., 1996.Artificial mixing prevents nuisance blooms of thecyanobacterium Microcystis in Lake Nieuwe Meer, theNetherlands. Freshwater Biology 36 (2), 435e450.
Wang, L., Cai, Q.H., Zhang, M., Tan, L., Xu, Y.Y., Kong, L.H., 2009.Spatiotemporal dynamics and related affecting factors ofsummer algal blooms in Xiangxi Bay of Three GorgesReservoir. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 20 (8),1940e1946 (in Chinese).
Wang, L., Cai, Q.H., Zhang, M., Tan, L., Kong, L.H., 2011a.Longitudinal patterns of phytoplankton distribution ina tributary bay under reservoir operation. QuaternaryInternational 244 (2), 280e288.
Wang, L., Cai, Q.H., Xu, Y.Y., Kong, L.H., Tan, L., Zhang, M., 2011b.Weekly dynamics of phytoplankton functional groups underhigh water level fluctuations in a subtropical reservoir-bay.Aquatic Ecology 45 (2), 197e212.
Wang, X.F., Wei, F.S., Qi, W.Q., 2002. Water and WastewaterMonitoring and Analysis Methods, fourth ed. ChinaEnvironmental Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
Wetzel, R.G., 2001. Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystems, thirded. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
Xu, Y.Y., Cai, Q.H., Han, X.Q., Shao, M.L., Liu, R.Q., 2010a. Factorsregulating trophic status in a large subtropical reservoir,
China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 169 (1e4),237e248.
Xu, Y.Y., Cai, Q.H., Ye, L., Shao, M.L., 2010b. Asynchrony of springphytoplankton response to temperature driver withina spatial heterogeneity bay of Three Gorges Reservoir, China.Limnologica Ecology and Management of Inland Waters 41 (3),174e180.
Xu, Y.Y., Cai, Q.H., Wang, L., Kong, L.H., Li, D.F., 2010c. Dielvertical migration of Peridiniopsis niei, Liu et al., a new speciesof dinoflagellates in an eutrophic bay of Three-GorgeReservoir, China. Aquatic Ecology 44 (2), 387e395.
Yang, Z.J., Liu, D.F., Yi, Z.Q., Ma, J., Yang, X., Ji, D.B., 2010a. Diurnalvertical migration of Peridiniopsis sp. in Xiangxi Bay of ThreeGorges reservoir. Environmental Science Research 23 (1),26e32 (in Chinese).
Yang, Z.J., Liu, D.F., Ji, D.B., Xiao, S.B., 2010b. Influence of theimpounding process of the Three Gorges Reservoir up to waterlevel 172.5 m on water eutrophication in the Xiangxi Bay.Science China Technological Sciences 53 (4), 1e12.
Yi, Z.Q., Liu, D.F., Yang, Z.J., Ma, J., Ji, D.B., 2009. Watertemperature structure and impact of which on the bloom inspring in Xianxi Bay of Three Gorges Reservoir. Journal ofHydroecology 2 (5), 6e11 (in Chinese).
Zheng, B.H., Wang, L.J., Gong, B., 2009. Load of non-point sourcepollutants from upstream rivers into Three Gorges Reservoir.Environmental Science Research 22 (2), 125e131 (in Chinese).
Zhou, G.J., Zhao, X.M., Bi, Y.H., Liang, Y.B., Hu, J.L., Yang, M.,Mei, Y., Zhu, K.X., Zhang, L., Hu, Z.Y., 2011. Phytoplanktonvariation and its relationship with the environment in XiangxiBay in spring after damming of the Three Gorges, China.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 176 (1e4),125e141.
Zhou, J.J., 2008. Improvement of eco-environmental conditions ofThree Gorges Reservoir by optimal operations. Science andTechnology Review 26 (7), 64e71 (in Chinese).