effects of self-assessment in networked university learning

Upload: laura-llull

Post on 06-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 Effects of Self-Assessment in Networked University Learning

    1/12

    Effects of self-assessment in

    networked university learningMg. Laura Llull

    Dr. Gustavo D. Constantino

  • 8/3/2019 Effects of Self-Assessment in Networked University Learning

    2/12

    Assessment and self-assessment

    Process of on-line education differs from the

    presencial.

    Assessment must be coherent with the different ways

    of teaching and of learning to form a quality process.

    Beyond the specific ends of the assessment, it

    produces effects, generates impacts in teachers and

    pupils (Centeno, Primogerio, Llull, 2007).

  • 8/3/2019 Effects of Self-Assessment in Networked University Learning

    3/12

    Effects of assessment

    They can be not awaited or deliberately looked.

    Some effects related with motivation, consolidation,

    anticipation (Barber, 2006)

    The assessment serves like a device for the

    improvement of educational results when it turns

    into SELF-ASSESSMENT, for pupils, teachers and

    authorities.

  • 8/3/2019 Effects of Self-Assessment in Networked University Learning

    4/12

    Self regulated learning

    Active and constructive process

    Where students regulate and control their cognitive

    processes, motivation and behavior according to their

    goals and the context (Pintrich, 2000).

    Components: regulation of metacognitive strategies,administration of efforts and cognitive strategies to

    learn (Pintrich and Of Groot, 1990)

    Typical of the expert pupils.

    It is needed a positive o favorecedor educational

    context and a positive perception of the students

    motivation: FORMATIVE EVALUATION.

  • 8/3/2019 Effects of Self-Assessment in Networked University Learning

    5/12

    Feedback and assessment

    Feedback propitiates the self-assessment

    It feeds the self-regulation processes and the

    metacognitive conscience: goal of the formativeevaluation.

    Used by autonomous and successful learners.

    Feedback: key point of on-line interactionbetween pupils and teachers.

  • 8/3/2019 Effects of Self-Assessment in Networked University Learning

    6/12

    Objective

    To show the relation between assessment,

    self-assessment and self regulated learning

    from the consideration of the effects

    according to what students and teachers said

    of three on-line academic programs and its

    relation with the feedback gave by the

    teachers.

  • 8/3/2019 Effects of Self-Assessment in Networked University Learning

    7/12

    Hipotesis

    The assessment is a regulation tool and itmust promote self regulated learningbecoming self assessment.

    The feedback given might be a key for this.

    The validity and significativity of universitylearning depends on the possibility of thepupils to empower their learning.

  • 8/3/2019 Effects of Self-Assessment in Networked University Learning

    8/12

    Method

    Qualitative study

    Effects that took place according to pupils and

    teachers after having received feedback.

    Aspects that promote effective feedback.

    Three careers of higher education dictated on-line in

    Argentina.

    Questionnaires to 14 teachers and 109 pupils.

  • 8/3/2019 Effects of Self-Assessment in Networked University Learning

    9/12

    Results I: Effects in learning according

    to pupils

    Fix knowledge and to clarify concepts.

    Reflect on their performance.

    Reinforce ways of learning.

    More inclined to read and to look for extra information. Reflect on their responsibility in the study.

    Transfer learnings out of the classroom.

    Motivate to continue the studies.

    Improve formal presentation Modify their personal attitude

    Work colaborativamente

  • 8/3/2019 Effects of Self-Assessment in Networked University Learning

    10/12

    Results II

    Effects in learning according to the teachers:

    Their activity level increased and their participationswere better.

    They corrected errors. They identified study topics that need to improve.

    They improved academic writing. They modified its points of view about some topics. Better valuation of the learned.

    Effects in the teaching:

    Modification of activities or in the consignas. Modification and enlargement of bibliography and

    study materials.

    Times adequacy.

    More reflection on the teaching process.

  • 8/3/2019 Effects of Self-Assessment in Networked University Learning

    11/12

    Feedback and self regulation

    Feedback like comments and explanations,

    especially written.

    Detailed, punctual comments linked to every

    item of the test.

    Feedback given on time.

    Possibility of re-writing or of redoing its works.

    Clearly delimited and well-known

    communicated criteria.

  • 8/3/2019 Effects of Self-Assessment in Networked University Learning

    12/12

    Conclusions

    The evaluation produces positive effects in the students afterthey received feedback from their teachers.

    These effects were linked to learning self regulation processes(motivational, cognitive and metacognitive) not specifics of theon-line education.

    On-line feedback must have certain characteristics to beeffective and to promote self-assessment and progress inlearnings.

    Also the assessment serves as a teaching regulatory strategyand improve the confidence in students that they were beingwell evaluated.

    Evaluation self-assessment - self-regulation: equalizepossibilities to be expert students capable of confrontingthe life long learning and re significate university learningand teaching