effects of self-assessment in networked university learning
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 Effects of Self-Assessment in Networked University Learning
1/12
Effects of self-assessment in
networked university learningMg. Laura Llull
Dr. Gustavo D. Constantino
-
8/3/2019 Effects of Self-Assessment in Networked University Learning
2/12
Assessment and self-assessment
Process of on-line education differs from the
presencial.
Assessment must be coherent with the different ways
of teaching and of learning to form a quality process.
Beyond the specific ends of the assessment, it
produces effects, generates impacts in teachers and
pupils (Centeno, Primogerio, Llull, 2007).
-
8/3/2019 Effects of Self-Assessment in Networked University Learning
3/12
Effects of assessment
They can be not awaited or deliberately looked.
Some effects related with motivation, consolidation,
anticipation (Barber, 2006)
The assessment serves like a device for the
improvement of educational results when it turns
into SELF-ASSESSMENT, for pupils, teachers and
authorities.
-
8/3/2019 Effects of Self-Assessment in Networked University Learning
4/12
Self regulated learning
Active and constructive process
Where students regulate and control their cognitive
processes, motivation and behavior according to their
goals and the context (Pintrich, 2000).
Components: regulation of metacognitive strategies,administration of efforts and cognitive strategies to
learn (Pintrich and Of Groot, 1990)
Typical of the expert pupils.
It is needed a positive o favorecedor educational
context and a positive perception of the students
motivation: FORMATIVE EVALUATION.
-
8/3/2019 Effects of Self-Assessment in Networked University Learning
5/12
Feedback and assessment
Feedback propitiates the self-assessment
It feeds the self-regulation processes and the
metacognitive conscience: goal of the formativeevaluation.
Used by autonomous and successful learners.
Feedback: key point of on-line interactionbetween pupils and teachers.
-
8/3/2019 Effects of Self-Assessment in Networked University Learning
6/12
Objective
To show the relation between assessment,
self-assessment and self regulated learning
from the consideration of the effects
according to what students and teachers said
of three on-line academic programs and its
relation with the feedback gave by the
teachers.
-
8/3/2019 Effects of Self-Assessment in Networked University Learning
7/12
Hipotesis
The assessment is a regulation tool and itmust promote self regulated learningbecoming self assessment.
The feedback given might be a key for this.
The validity and significativity of universitylearning depends on the possibility of thepupils to empower their learning.
-
8/3/2019 Effects of Self-Assessment in Networked University Learning
8/12
Method
Qualitative study
Effects that took place according to pupils and
teachers after having received feedback.
Aspects that promote effective feedback.
Three careers of higher education dictated on-line in
Argentina.
Questionnaires to 14 teachers and 109 pupils.
-
8/3/2019 Effects of Self-Assessment in Networked University Learning
9/12
Results I: Effects in learning according
to pupils
Fix knowledge and to clarify concepts.
Reflect on their performance.
Reinforce ways of learning.
More inclined to read and to look for extra information. Reflect on their responsibility in the study.
Transfer learnings out of the classroom.
Motivate to continue the studies.
Improve formal presentation Modify their personal attitude
Work colaborativamente
-
8/3/2019 Effects of Self-Assessment in Networked University Learning
10/12
Results II
Effects in learning according to the teachers:
Their activity level increased and their participationswere better.
They corrected errors. They identified study topics that need to improve.
They improved academic writing. They modified its points of view about some topics. Better valuation of the learned.
Effects in the teaching:
Modification of activities or in the consignas. Modification and enlargement of bibliography and
study materials.
Times adequacy.
More reflection on the teaching process.
-
8/3/2019 Effects of Self-Assessment in Networked University Learning
11/12
Feedback and self regulation
Feedback like comments and explanations,
especially written.
Detailed, punctual comments linked to every
item of the test.
Feedback given on time.
Possibility of re-writing or of redoing its works.
Clearly delimited and well-known
communicated criteria.
-
8/3/2019 Effects of Self-Assessment in Networked University Learning
12/12
Conclusions
The evaluation produces positive effects in the students afterthey received feedback from their teachers.
These effects were linked to learning self regulation processes(motivational, cognitive and metacognitive) not specifics of theon-line education.
On-line feedback must have certain characteristics to beeffective and to promote self-assessment and progress inlearnings.
Also the assessment serves as a teaching regulatory strategyand improve the confidence in students that they were beingwell evaluated.
Evaluation self-assessment - self-regulation: equalizepossibilities to be expert students capable of confrontingthe life long learning and re significate university learningand teaching