effects of revison of aga 3 part 2

57
EFFECTS OF APRIL 2000 REVISION OF API 14.3 PART 2 ORIFICE METER TUBES

Upload: kazuto-kawakita

Post on 12-Oct-2014

97 views

Category:

Documents


7 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

EFFECTS OFAPRIL 2000

REVISION OFAPI 14.3 PART 2

ORIFICE METERTUBES

Page 2: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

INTERNAL SURFACE FINISH

UPSTREAM LENGTH

STRAIGHTENING VANES

FLOW CONDITIONERS

8” PLATE THICKNESS

THERMOWELL LOCATION

STAGGERED TAPS

P LEAD LINES

INCREASED DIFFERENTIAL

GRANDFATHER CLAUSE

Page 3: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

INTERNAL FINISHINTERNAL FINISH

WAS 250 MICROINCH THROUGHOUT

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

•NOW SIZE AND BETA DEPENDENT

Page 4: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

METER TUBES TO 12” SIZE

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

INTERNAL SURFACE FINISH

Page 5: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

METER TUBES 16” & LARGER

INTERNAL SURFACE FINISH

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

Page 6: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

THOUGH UNDESIRABLE, ARE NOW ALLOWED,IF THEY DON’T

→EXCEED I.D. TOLERANCE

→EXCEED FINISH REQUIREMENT

PITS

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

Page 7: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

UPSTREAM LENGTH SELECTIONUPSTREAM LENGTH SELECTION

→BARE TUBE ( no vane or conditioner)

→SHORT TUBE WITH VANE

→LONG TUBE WITH VANE

→TUBE WITH CONDITIONER

4 CATEGORIES

Page 8: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

CATEGORY ( no vane or conditioner )

NOW IS 145D

UNIVERSAL “CATCH ALL” METER TUBE

Page 9: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

CATEGORY Bare Meter Tubes continued,

Shorter Lengths Possible For Specific Installations

CATEGORY Bare Meter Tubes continued,

Shorter Lengths Possible For Specific Installations

→Single 90º Elbow @ .75β ---44D

→(2) 90’s Out of Plane (close coupled) @ .5β --95D

→Concentric Reducer @ .75β --13D

→Tee (used as an elbow-not header) @ .75β --44D

Page 10: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

See

detail

CATEGORY

NO VANE OR

CONDITIONER

Page 11: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

MAX .46 BETA

CATEGORY SHORT VERSION WITH VANE

UNIVERSAL METER TUBE WITH VANE

Page 12: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

SHORT UPSTREAMLENGTH WITH TUBE

BUNDLE

COMPARISON OFOLD AND NEW

REQUIREMENTS

CATEGORY

Page 13: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

CATEGORY

Short upstream

with tube bundle

Page 14: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

CAREGORY LONG VERSION WITH VANE

MAX .67 BETA

UNIVERSAL METER TUBE WITH VANE

Page 15: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

CATEGORY

LONG UPSTREAM

WITH TUBE BUNDLE

Page 16: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

LONG UPSTREAMLENGTH WITH TUBE

BUNDLE

COMPARISON OF OLDAND NEW

REQUIREMENTS

CATEGORY

Page 17: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

THE METER TUBE LENGTH INFORMATION

CONTAINED IN THIS REVISION WAS BASED ON

THE RESULTS OF ACTUAL FLOW TESTING AT

12 LABS (DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL),

USING BOTH LIQUID AND GAS.

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

Page 18: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

TUBE BUNDLE STRAIGHTENING VANES

Page 19: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

19 CONCENTRIC SAME SIZE TUBES

NEW, TIGHTER TOLERANCES

TUBE BUNDLE STRAIGHTENING VANES

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

CONCENTRIC PATTERN

Page 20: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

HEX PATTERN

NOT ALLOWED

TUBE BUNDLE STRAIGHTENING VANES

HEX PATTERN

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

Page 21: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

END BANDS

NOT ALLOWED

TUBE BUNDLE STRAIGHTENING VANES

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

END BANDS

Page 22: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

7 TUBE BUNDLE

NOT ALLOWED

TUBE BUNDLE STRAIGHTENING VANES

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

7 TUBE BUNDLE FOR 2” SIZE

Page 23: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

FLOW CONDITIONINGFLOW CONDITIONING

Page 24: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

FLOW CONDITIONERS

REMOVE SWIRL AND CREATE A NEAR

FULLY DEVELOPED FLOW PROFILE

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

Page 25: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

THE DANIEL PROFILERTM

CONDITIONER PLATE

Page 26: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

Profiler™ Installation

Page 27: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

METER TUBE WITH PROFILER

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

Page 28: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

Meter tube upstream lengthsand beta ratio limits for usewith all flow conditionersother than the standard tubebundle will be established bythe manufacturer based onrequired testing

(ref. Par. 2.5.5.4 AGA-3/API 14.3 April2000)

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

Page 29: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

THE USE OF FLOWCONDITIONERS MAY ALLOWSHORTER UPSTREAM PIPELENGTHS

BUTA SERIES OF TESTS MUST BE RUNBEFORE OFFERING THE DEVICETO THE MARKET

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

Page 30: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

Disturbance TestsDisturbance Tests

→Good Flow Conditions

→Two 900 Elbows in Perpendicular Planes

→Gate Valve 50% Closed

→High Swirl

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

Flow Conditioner Qualification Test

Page 31: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

Flow Conditioner Qualification Test

•Good Flow Conditions - test evaluating impact of flowconditioner on fully developed velocity profile.

•Install the conditioner in the specified location preceding ameter tube where the installation has been shown to alreadyhave a swirl free, fully developed profile. This proves thedevice has no negative effect on flow.

Page 32: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

•Two 900 Elbows in Perpendicular Planes - testing of flowconditioner performance in handling combination of a modestswirl and a non-symmetrical velocity profile.

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

Flow Conditioner Qualification Test

Page 33: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

Gate Valve 50% Closed - test evaluating flow conditionerperformance in strongly non-symmetrical velocity profile

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

Flow Conditioner Qualification Test

Page 34: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

•High Swirl - test assessing flow conditioner performancein flows with high swirl angle (over 250).

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

Flow Conditioner Qualification Test

Swirl must be reduced to 2º Max

Page 35: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

Additional TestsAdditional Tests

– Orifice β ratio: Check swirl test at β=0.40 andβ=0.67

– Reynolds Number Sensitivity: Test at tworanges 10,000 < Re <500,000 and Re > 1MMwith approximately a 7:1 ratio.

– Scaling: Test at two sizes selected from D < 4” and D > 8”

Flow Conditioner Qualification Test

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

Page 36: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

ANY FLOW CONDITIONERCHOSEN SHOULD HAVE TESTDATA SHOWING COMPLIANCEWITH THE TESTING PROGRAMOUTLINED IN AGA/14.3

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

Page 37: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

WAS 12” TO 36” UPSTREAM OF VANE

NOW IS 36” MINIMUM UPSTREAM OF VANE

UPSTREAM THERMOWELL LOCATION

Page 38: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

STAGGERED PRESSURE TAPSSTAGGERED PRESSURE TAPS

NOT ALLOWED

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

STAGGERED PRESSURE TAPS

Page 39: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

PLATE THICKNESS CHANGE

→8” SIZE WAS 1/8” THICK

→NOW IS 1/4” THICK

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

Reason: differential was limited to 150” in an orifice fitting

Page 40: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

→Some 1/8” and 1/4”seal/plate assemblies may beinterchangeable in the samefitting, allowing installation ofthe wrong plate in the rightfitting

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

IMPACT OF 8” PLATE CHANGE TO 1/4” THICK

Page 41: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

→Plate carriers and/or seal rings forsome manufacturers’ fittings maybe different for 1/8” and 1/4” thickplates

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

IMPACT OF 8” PLATE CHANGE TO 1/4” THICK

Page 42: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

→Existing installations using1/8” thick plates will requirecareful organization if 1/4”units are added

IMPACT OF 8” PLATE CHANGE TO 1/4” THICK

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

Page 43: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

PLATE THICKNESS CHANGE

→24” SIZE WAS 3/8” THICK

→NOW IS 1/2” THICK

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

Reason: differential was limited to 150”

Page 44: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

DP TAP CONNECTION LINE LENGTHS

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

Page 45: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

→EQUAL LENGTH LINES

→SHORT AS POSSIBLE

DP TAP CONNECTION LINE LENGTHS

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

Page 46: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

DIFFERENTIAL TAP LINE LENGTHDIFFERENTIAL TAP LINE LENGTH

IF RESONANCE OR PULSATION IS SUSPECTED,– CALCULATE PROPER LENGTH USING THESE 5 EQUATIONS BASED ON

PULSATION FREQUENCY (f) AND SPEED OF SOUND IN FLUID (a)

length L = factor x a / (2 B f )

0.25

2.5

5.5

8.5

11.5

THE RESULTING LENGTH NEAREST THAT PREFERRED SHOULD BE USED

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

DP TAP CONNECTION LINE LENGTHS

Page 47: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

INCREASED DIFFERENTIAL PRESSUREINCREASED DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE

TABLES SHOWING MAXIMUM DP FORRECOMMENDED PLATE THICKNESSES

– 304SS AND 316SS

– TEMPERATURES TO 150ºF (65ºC)

– INSTALLED IN BOTH FITTINGS AND FLANGES• FLANGES ALLOW MUCH HIGHER DIFFERENTIALS

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

INCREASED DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURES

Page 48: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

INCREASED DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURECONTINUEDINCREASED DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURECONTINUED

SOME SIZES ALLOW UP TO 1000” DP

– VALUES BASED ON PLATE DEFLECTION ONLY

– ANY OPERATIONAL EFFECTS ON ORIFICE FITTINGS NOTCONSIDERED

ADDITIONAL TABLES FOR OTHER THAN STANDARD PLATETHICKNESSES IN APPENDIX

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

INCREASED DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURES

Page 49: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

POSSIBLEEFFECT OFDIFFERENTIALPRESSURESEXCEEDINGVALUESSHOWN

INCREASED DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURES

Page 50: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

GRANDFATHER CLAUSE

From API 14.3 Part 2, Par 2.1, April 2000

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

Page 51: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

It is strongly recommended that a copyof the new standard be obtained andread thoroughly as there are manydetails not covered in this presentation

It is strongly recommended that a copyof the new standard be obtained andread thoroughly as there are manydetails not covered in this presentation

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

Page 52: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

THE ENDTHE END

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

Page 53: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

TAP HOLE LOCATION TOLERANCE FROM 14.3

Page 54: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

HOW TO MEET 14.3 WITH A 1/4” THICK PLATE IN A FITTINGDRILLED FOR A 1/8” THICK PLATE

4” & LARGER

LIMIT BETA

TO .6

Page 55: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2
Page 56: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2

If distance “S” between 2 fittings is 22D or more,only the fitting nearest the orifice is considered

2.6.3.1

CHANGES TO API 14.3 - APRIL 2000

Page 57: Effects of Revison of AGA 3 Part 2