effects of learning space design on call pedagogy

41
CALICO 2010 1 Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy Angelika Kraemer & Scott Schopieray Michigan State University CALICO, Amherst, June 10, 2010

Upload: schopie1

Post on 29-Nov-2014

433 views

Category:

Education


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Angelika Kraemer & Scott Schopieray Michigan State University CALICO, Amherst, June 10, 2010

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 1

Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

Angelika Kraemer & Scott Schopieray

Michigan State University

CALICO, Amherst, June 10, 2010

Page 2: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 2

Overview

Learning space design researchResearch studyLearning space design revisited Implications and recommendations

Page 3: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 3

Learning Space Design Research

“use of the physical environment is perhaps the least understood and the

most neglected”

- Banning and Canard (1986)

Page 4: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

21st Century Learning Spaces

Demand flexibility

Have a social component

Have embedded technology

Are inspirational

CALICO 2010 4

Walls, Schopieray, Devoss, 2009

Page 5: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

Issues with Classroom Space

Our classrooms are often stuck in industrial revolution era designs

After elementary school we often give the physical environment very little thought when considering student development

Our spaces often communicate: What happens in a classroom is, and should be, abstracted from what is happening outside its walls

CALICO 2010 5

Page 6: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

Themes from Literature

CALICO 2010 6

Static Design

Un-Wired

Teacher Centered

Individual Work

Flexible Design

Wired

Learner Centered

Collaborative Work

“Learning/Information Commons”

Page 7: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 7

CALL Learning Spaces

Redesigned learning studios coincide with:

Reformed curriculum Changes in pedagogy

and They seem to empower students to

collaborate and communicate in ways they had not previously done.

Tom et al. (2008)

Page 8: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 8

Poll

Look at the following pictures. >

Which classroom setup do you like and why?

Which classroom setup do you think students like and why?

Page 9: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 9

Research Study

Use of instructional spaceInstructor and student perceptionsSuggestions for redesigned spaces

Page 10: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 10

Context

Michigan State University No university-wide language requirement 2-year requirement in Arts & Letters Students are required to own a computer Over 30 languages offered Move toward hybrid language instruction 2 Mac language labs, 27 computer labs 84% of classrooms are technology-enhanced

Page 11: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 11

Participants: Instructors (N = 8)

Page 12: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 12

Participants: Students (N = 48)

Page 13: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 13

Instruments

Online surveysLikert-scale questionsShort-answer questionsDemographic information

Open-ended interviews with studentsProbes based on surveysComments on pictures

Page 14: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 14

Quantitative Results

Classroom setupsOverall impressionComfort of roomEase of teaching/learning in roomTechnology providedFurnitureEffects of setup on teaching/learning

Page 15: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 15

Classroom Setups - General

All (N=167) Lg courses (N=96)

Seats in rows 46 43

Seats in semi-circles 39 32

Tables in rows 30 9

Labs in rows 18 4

Pods 17 5

Labs in pods 11 1

Auditoriums 5 0

Large table 2 2

Angelika Kraemer:

Is this slide necessary?

Angelika Kraemer:

Is this slide necessary?

Page 16: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 16

Classroom Setups - Study

OHP 3

Tech Podium 6

Smart Board 1

Lab in rows 1

9 rooms have individual seats in rows, easy to modify

1 room has large tables with chairs, easy to modify

Page 17: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 17

Page 18: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 18

Classroom Setups - Inst Favorite

Page 19: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 19

Classroom Setups - Ss Favorite

Page 20: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 20

Quantitative Results

Page 21: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 21

Effects of Setup on Teaching/Learning

Instructors Yes: 100%

Access to and interaction with Ss

View of teacher Movability Natural light Technology

Students Yes: 87%

Positive: 53% Negative: 25% Neutral: 22%

No: 7% Maybe: 6%

Comfort Semi-circle Size

Page 22: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 22

Qualitative Results

Effects of setup on teaching/learningPositive and negative aspects about

roomsSuggested changesComments on pictures (interviews)Additional comments

Page 23: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 23

Effects of Setup on Teaching/Learning

I think the way a classroom is structured affects the methods I can use when teaching. For instance, if I'm not able to easily move furniture I can be stuck teaching in only one style. The ease of technology use is also a factor, the technology can't be something that I have to spend a lot of time setting up. (T8)

It's hard to have more than a notebook open on the surface of the desk/chair, and it's grating. Many times during class my concentration is broken by having to juggle stuff around so that I can write comfortably, or someone else has dropped their books, pens, pencils, etc. all over the floor. (S13)

It should harbor co-operative, student centered learning, providing a multitude of opportunities for the instructor to easily give over control of the class to the students by have there not be a front of the room, always occupied by the instructor. (S38)

Page 24: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

Positive Aspects about the Rooms

CALICO 2010 24

Page 25: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 25

Positive Aspects about the Rooms

Instructors Room Setup – space

to move, boards, windows

Ability to move Furniture

Technology

Students Windows/Natural

Light Writing Spaces –

Blackboards/Whiteboards

Ability to move furniture around

Technology

Page 26: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

Negative Aspects about the Rooms

CALICO 2010 26

Page 27: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 27

Negative Aspects about the Rooms

Instructors Temperature Noise Classroom Setup Technology – not

working

Students Furniture – size,

style, blocked vision Way space is kept –

dirty, small, unorganized

Technology – not working

Temperature

Page 28: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

Suggested Changes

CALICO 2010 28

Page 29: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 29

Suggested Changes

Instructors Room Setup Furniture Temperature

Students Furniture Room Setup Technology Temperature

Page 30: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 30

Comments on Pictures

Page 31: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 31

Additional Comments

Page 32: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 32

Learning Space Design Revisited

Page 33: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 33

Implications and Recommendations

Instructors ABC Students do not seem to have a

preference for a specific spaceStudents are concerned with the

teaching

=> Room design should impact pedagogy positively instead of trying to influence students

Page 34: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 34

Limitations

Small sample sizeLacking diversity of classroomsLacking diversity of language courses

Page 35: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 35

Future Directions

Continuation of study includingMore instructors and studentsStudents of different subjects

Examining changes in perceptions over time

Page 36: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 36

Thank you

Scott Schopieray

Director for Educational Technology

College of Arts and Letters

Michigan State University

[email protected]

Angelika Kraemer

Co-Curricular and Outreach Coordinator

Center for Language Teaching Advancement

Michigan State University

[email protected]

Page 37: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy
Page 38: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy
Page 39: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 39

Page 40: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy

CALICO 2010 40

Page 41: Effects of Learning Space Design on CALL Pedagogy