effects of biodiveristy on ecosystem functioning john bruno [email protected] 962-0263
Post on 21-Dec-2015
222 views
TRANSCRIPT
What is biodiversity?
Genetic
Species & species richness (#/unit area)
Higher taxonomic level
Functional group
What is ecosystem functioning?
Primary production (g/m2)
Primary productivity (g/m2/hour)
Secondary production
Resource use efficiency
Resistance and resiliance, stability
Invasibility
Tilman’s study of the effect of plant diversity on productivity
Manipulated plant diversity (0 to 16 species) by adding seeds and extensive weeding Measured productivity as biomass (above and below ground)
• Plant diversity has strong positive effects on primary production
• Transgressive overyielding is common
• Selection effects are positive and partially drive biodiversity effects
• The most productive species dominate polycultures
“Plant biodiversity paradigm”
Jamaica photosynthesis measurements
Temperature: 27-28ºC
Flow: 4-8 cm/s
Salinity: 35 ppt
Light: 800-1000 uE
red algae green algae
brown algae
Sample size: 10
Duration: 10 days (January 2003)
Starting wet weight: 60g
P < 0.001P = 0.35
North Carolina Identity Richness RYT
Mesocosm experiment I 0.68 0 1.15
Mesocosm experiment II 0.76 0.01 1.43
Mesocosm experiment III 0.07 0.07 1.21
Field experiment I 0.55 0 1.05
Field experiment II 0.53 0.09 1.24
Photosynthesis experiment 0.28 0 na
Jamaica
Field experiment 0.497 0.003 1.18
Photosynthesis experiment 0.437 0.008 na
Effect size
• Plant diversity effects are relatively weak and frequently undetectable
• Compositional effects are much stronger
• Transgressive overyielding is rare
• Selection effects are often negative and reduce net biodiversity effects
• The most productive species rarely dominate polycultures
Englehardt and Richie 2002Hector et al. 2002-other BIODEPTH papersCallaway et al. 2003Hooper and Dukes 2004Fridley 2002Downing 2004Bruno et al. 2005
“New Consensus”
Duffy and Hay’s amphipod study
From Duffy and Hay 2000. Ecological Monographs 10:237-263
Dr. Emmett Duffy
Duffy’s test of the herbivore diversity hypothesis
Manipulated micrograzer diversity (0-6 species)Used outdoor mesocosms at VIMSMeasured effects on a variety of ecosystem parameters (algal biomass, sediment organic content, benthic diversity)
No grazersNo grazers Idotea onlyIdotea only
Erichsonella onlyErichsonella onlyAll six speciesAll six species
Duffy’s test of the herbivore diversity hypothesis
0 2 4 6
AFDM (g)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0 2 4 6
AFDM (g)
0
5
10Algal biomass
0 2 4 6
% dry sediment mass0.1
0.2
0.3
0 2 4 6
Taxon richness10
15
20
Benthic diversity
Grazer biomass
Sediment organic C
EB
D GIC
E BD G
I
C
E
B
D
G
I
C
E
BD
G
I
C
AFDM (g)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6 Botryllus biomass
E
B
D G
IC
E
B
D
G
IC
Grazer species richness
0 2 4 6
Dominance ratio0.0
0.5
1.0
Trophic groupdominance
Grazer species richness
Main findings:1) Most of the herbivores specialized
on one or a few types of algae
2) Increasing micrograzer diversity reduced primary production
3) The mechanism appears to be diet complimentarity
Duffy’s test of the herbivore diversity hypothesis
Duffy et al. 2004 Ecology Letters
Predicted effects of increasing predator diversity on herbivores and plants, categorized as mechanisms that increase or decrease plant biomass
– Herbivory, + Plant biomass
1) dietary complementarity
2) facilitation among predators
3) selection of a keystone predator
4) reduction of intraspecific competition
5) change in prey behavior (a TMII)
+ Herbivory, – Plant biomass
1) intraguild predation
2) cannibalism
3) predator emigration
4) change in predator behavior
5) omnivory
Predators ((((
Herbivores
Plants
_
_
shrimp blennies killifish crabs pinfish
isopods amphipods
green algae red algae brown algae
_
+