effect of corn plant spacing on ovt results
DESCRIPTION
EFFECT OF CORN PLANT SPACING ON OVT RESULTS. Daryl Bowman. RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN FURROW OPENER, CORN PLANT SPACING, AND YIELD. D.C. Erbach , D.E. Wilkins, and W.G. Lovely Agronomy Journal 65:702-704. FINDINGS. LOOKING AT IMPROVING YIELD BY IMPROVING PLANT SPACING UNIFORMITY - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
EFFECT OF CORN PLANT SPACING ON OVT RESULTS
Daryl Bowman
RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN FURROW OPENER, CORN
PLANT SPACING, AND YIELDD.C. Erbach, D.E. Wilkins, and W.G. Lovely
Agronomy Journal 65:702-704
FINDINGSLOOKING AT IMPROVING YIELD BY
IMPROVING PLANT SPACING UNIFORMITY
ON A FIELD SCALE, WITH CORN PLANTED ON 38” ROWS, IMPROVING INTRA-ROW PLANT SPACING MAY NOT SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVE TOTAL YIELD
RESPONSE OF CORN TO UNEVEN EMERGENCE
Emerson D. Hafziger, Paul R. Carter and E.E. Graham
Crop Science 31:811-815
MATERIALS AND METHODS7 ENVIRONMENTSILLINOIS AND WISCONSINTWO HYBRIDSHAND PLANTED AT 3 DIFFERENT
TIMES TO SIMULATE UNEVEN EMERGENCE
RESULTSLATE-EMERGING PLANTS DID NOT
CAUSE YIELD LOSS COMPARED TO INCOMPLETE STANDS
UNEVEN EMERGENCE DID CAUSE YIELD LOSS
NO BENEFIT IN REPLANTING UNLESS LESS THAN HALF STAND
INFLUENCE OF WITHIN-ROW VARIABILITY IN PLANT
SPACING ON CORN GRAIN YIELD
J.M. KRALL, H.A.ESECHIE, R.J. RANEY, S. CLARK, G. TENEYCK, M. LUNDQUIST, N.E.
HUMBURG, L.S. AXTHELM, A.D.DAYTON, AND R.L. VANDERLIP.
AGRONOMY JOURNAL 69:797-799
MATERIALS AND METHODS4 YEARS3 IRRIGATED LOCATIONSMEASURED WITHIN-ROW VARIABILITY AND CALCULATED SD
RESULTSGRAIN YIELDS DECREASED WITH INCREASED IN-ROW VARIABILITY
ESTIMATING CORN YIELD LOSSES FROM UNEVENLY
SPACED PLANTINGG. CARLSON, T. DOERGE, AND D. CLAY
SITE-SPECIFIC MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES37
CONCLUSIONSEXPECT A SD OF 2 INCHES AS THE BEST THAT A CORN FARMER CAN ACHIEVE
YIELDS CAN BE EXPECTED TO GO DOWN WITH SD ABOVE 2.0 INCHES
STAND ESTABLISHMENT VARIABILITY IN CORN
R.L. NIELSENDEPT. OF AGRONOMY,PURDUE
AGRY-91-01
CONCLUSIONSA SD OF 2 INCHES IS ABOUT THE BEST ONE CAN EXPECT
EFFECT OF PLANT SPACING VARIABILITY ON CORN
GRAIN YIELDR.L. NIELSEN
PURDUE
MATERIALS AND METHODSTWO CORN HYBRIDSONE FLEX EAR HYBRIDONE FIXED EAR HYBRIDONE YEAR5 LOCATIONS5 PLANT SPACINGS GIVING
VARYING UNIFORMITY
RESULTSHYBRID X VARIABILITY
INTERACTION AT 3 OF 5 LOCATIONS
NO CONSISTENT HYBRID DIFFERENCE WHERE INTERACTIONS OCCURRED
UNEVEN PLANT SPACING DID NOT FAVOR ONE HYBRID OVER THE OTHER CONSISTENTLY
FEASIBILITY STUDIES ON PLANTING CORN TRIALS
TO A STAND D. T. BOWMAN
CROP SCI. 27:1231-1234
MATERIALS AND METHODS10 RANDOM HYBRIDS IN 3
MATURITIES7 ENVIRONMENTSTHINNED TO A STAND VERSUS
PLANTING TO A STAND AT 110%
THINNING RESULTED IN MORE UNIFORM STANDSMATURITY TREATME
NTGRAIN YIELD
% STAND SD
EARLY THIN 5455 96 10.3**
NO THIN 5401 96 11.3
MEDIUM THIN 7991 98 10.5**
NO THIN 7956 98 12.3
LATE THIN 6525 100** 11.5**
NO THIN 6446 104 13.5
NO SIGNIFICANT ENTRY X TRT INTERACTION
MATURITY DF MS
EARLY 9 574471
error 120 486084
MEDIUM 9 699373
error 135 504835
LATE 9 546082
error 120 686359
CONCLUSIONSTHINNING RESULTED IN A MORE
UNIFORM STANDTHIS DID NOT RESULT IN A
HYBRID X TREATMENT INTERACTION
I.E. THE BEST HYBRIDS WERE ALWAYS ON TOP AND THE DOGS WERE ALWAYS ON THE BOTTOM
MY CONCLUSIONSNO ONE HAS SHOWN A CONSISTENT
HYBRID X SPACING INTERACTIONALL ENTRIES ARE TREATED THE
SAME IN OVTsSURE PERFECT SPACING MAY
INCREASE YIELDS BUT NO ONE HAS SHOWED VARIABLE PLANT SPACING AFFECTS RELATIVE CORN PERFORMANCE