ee 110-1 b 8 th

11/4/21

1

Gerry RauFall 2021

Class 8

1

1

2

2

Endnote/Citations� Helpful, useful, easier, saves time, …� The more references you have, the more useful it is

� 3 references – some� 30 references – very � 300 references – essential

� Forgot the steps, don’t know how to …� Many more class days and assignments to practice, ask

3

3

TA� TA helped solve problems

4

4

Getting better� Understanding whole structure – feels good

� English getting better� Exponential growth (or maybe logistic)

� Reaches a certain point, rapid noticeable change

54 8 12 16

5

6

6

11/4/21

2

Common problems� What is the difference?

� “Three of my articles follow IPTC format.”� “All three of my articles follow IPTC format.”

� “Topic sentences with component markers”� Used in textbook, Ch. 4 – excellent exemplar

� Topic sentence = first sentence in paragraph� Most of your examples are not ‘topic sentences’

� Use “Sentences” or “Examples”

7

7

Common problems� Table 1-3

� Tables

� Align columns of numbers: which is better?

8

Leftalign Centeralign Rightalign Decimalalign1 1 1 122 22 22 22333 333 333 3334444 4444 4444 444455555 55555 55555 55555

8

Common problems� Staggered

� Refers to physical structure only� Ideas: repeated cyclically, recurrent

9

9

Table structure� Similar contents – similar structure

� All component analysis� Introduction – only one section � Other divisions – section/paragraph

10

10

Graphics Types and Locations

Good Tables and Titles

Work Time(Citations

and Graphics,

Corrections)

Assignment

Visualizing your Work

11

8.1-4

12

12

11/4/21

3

Exemplar presentations (Th)� Introduction 10/7 Richard Sammy� Process/Method 10/14 Hsuan Kent� T&C / R&D 10/21 Corn Jenny� Citations 10/27 Han� Graphics 11/4 Matthew

13

13

Using present research for support

Prepared by: Chieh Deng

Modified by: Gerald Rau

14

Evidence from current researchTransitions

• How sharp is the transition between past and present research?• Sharp, uniform location in science (between Introduction and Method)• Not that clear in engineering (within Process somewhere)

• Where can you find transitions most often?• Between framework and research details• Marker like “we propose” or “in this paper”

• Where should I look (decreasing clarity)• Beginning of section, first sentence (In this section we …)• Beginning of subsection, first sentence (We next describe …)• Beginning of paragraph, first sentence (Building on this, we …)• Hidden within a paragraph• No marker between old and new (Common in math, extension)

15

15

Evidence from current researchPresent support

16

ExamplesEquations

Data Collection

Data

16

Evidence from current researchExamples and Equations

17

ExamplesEquations • Numbered or bulleted examples or equations

17

Evidence from current researchData Collection

18

ExamplesEquations

Data Collection

• Numbered or bulleted examples or equations

• Details and sources of materials• Details of present research design and procedures• Details of new design, intermediate testing of parts• Details of proof, lemmas, mathematical argument, algorithm• Detailed description of data collection and testing procedures

18

11/4/21

4

Evidence from current researchData

19

ExamplesEquations

Data Collection

Data• Data summary or highlight in text• Data patterns visualized in graphics• Data comparison, sometimes using statistical test results

• Numbered or bulleted examples or equations

• Details and sources of materials• Details of present research design and procedures• Details of new design, intermediate testing of parts• Details of proof, lemmas, mathematical argument, algorithm• Detailed description of data collection and testing procedures

19

Evidence from current researchGraphics

20

Graphics

Figures

GraphsTables Illustrations

20

GraphicsGraphics and text

21

Graphics and text should supplement each other, but not just duplicate the information.

Detail Summary

DetailSummary

21

GraphicsTitles

22

Title aboveSeparate lineSmall capsCentered

Title belowSame lineSentenceLeft justify

22

GraphicsTable format

• No vertical lines• Horizontal lines

• Top and bottom• Below heading

• Unit in parenthesis• Unit for column in separate line• Use space to separate groups

23

23

GraphicsTable layout

• Compare numbers in a column, words across a row

24

Frequency (GHz) 1 2 3 4 5 6

Magnitude (dB) 9.82 12.21 3.50 10.33 6.28 11.41

Frequency(GHz)

Magnitude(dB)

1 9.82

2 12.21

3 3.50

4 10.33

5 6.28

6 11.41

For words, think about the way you read, and the answer would be clear!

Forwords,thinkaboutthewayyouread,

andtheanswerwouldbeclear!

24

11/4/21

5

Section 8.5

25

25

Location of graphics� Comparison of sample articles

� Tables and Graphs common in R

26

IMRD(Effects of Rainfall)I M R D

TablesNumerical 9

FiguresGraphsIllustrations

26


� Tables and Graphs common in R

27

IMRD(Effects of Rainfall)I M R D

TablesNumerical 9

FiguresGraphsIllustrations Map

27


� Tables and Graphs common in R or T

28

IMRD(Effects of Rainfall)

IPTC(Voronoi Neighbors)

I M R D I P T CTables

Numerical 9Figures

Graphs 11Illustrations Map

28


� Tables and Graphs common in R or T� Far more illustrations in I, P of IPTC

29

IMRD(Effects of Rainfall)

IPTC(Voronoi Neighbors)

I M R D I P T CTables

Numerical 9Figures

Graphs 11Illustrations Map 2 5

29

Tables in 40 IEEE articles

30

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Tables

Component

Tables per journal, by component

CAD EC MW PA PD SG BM MI

30

11/4/21

6

Graphs in 40 IEEE articles

31

020406080100120140160180

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Graph

s

Component

Graphs per journal, by component


31

Illustrations in 40 IEEE articles

32

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Illustrations

Component

Illustrations per journal, by component


32

Graphics in 40 IEEE articles

33

050100

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Tables

050100150200

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Graphs

050100150

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Illustrations

33

Citations in 40 IEEE articles

34

0

50

100

150

200

250

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Cita

tions

Component

Median citations per journal, by component


34

Section 24.3

35

35

Good Numerical Table

36

Natural direction to compare numbers

Space guides reading

36

11/4/21

7

Good Numerical Table� Vertical (columns)

� Quantities you want to compare� Allows quick impression of size based on first digit

� Often results

� Horizontal (rows)� Categories to be compared, in logical order

� Ascending, descending, sequential, alphabetical� Often treatments

37

37

Table Formatting� Unit on last line of Header, in parentheses� Round data to the same number of decimal places

� Or significant digits

� Do not split words� Eliminate blank space

� Fit the column size of journal� See Instructions to Authors

38

Separatio

n

38

Table Dividing Lines� No vertical dividing lines

(Historical reason – difficulty of typesetting)� Occasionally between Row Headings and Data� Use space instead

� Few horizontal dividing lines1. Table Title /Column Headings2. Column Headings /Data3. Data /Summary4. Table /Footnotes or bottom

39

1

2

4

(No summary)

39

Sample Table

target strain !within !3% error" can be accurately imposed to the sample. Figure 2 showsa typical plot of the applied strain history in the non-reversing flow. The imposition timeti for each target strain is approximately 0.06 s, which satisfies the criterion ti"#R#Venerus !2005"$. All the data reported in this work represent the average from twoindependent measurements, and the corresponding error bars are also plotted. To mini-mize the effect of residual stress, the rest time between two separate experimental runswas kept to be no less than ten times of the reptation time. Moreover, the reported datawere noted to be free from the effect of polymer degradation, and good data reproduc-ibility was observed for all sample solutions studied.

TABLE II. Discrete relaxation spectra for samples I and II, respectively,at T=25 °C.

i$i

!s"

Sample I Sample II

Gi

!Pa"Gi

!Pa"

1 0.003 1719 32242 0.01 212.3 4.43 0.03 558.4 532.34 0.10 556.0 276.15 0.30 583.4 411.96 1.0 775.7 391.57 3.0 542.9 507.88 10.0 721.9 533.99 30.0 495.6 615.110 100 8.1 377.811 300 2.3 69.412 1000 0.1 0.1

FIG. 2. The applied strain history in non-reversing double-step strain flow for sample II. In this case, the timeinterval between %1=7 and %2=7 is 15.0 s and the inset shows the detailed deformation history of the secondstrain.

785CHAIN STRETCH IN ENTANGLED SOLUTIONS

40

Good: Horizontal lines(Units)Align on decimal

40

Graphics problems� File on ECourse2

41

41

What could be improved?

42

Too many lines!

Why feet?

Explains odd distances in cm

Align units

42

11/4/21

8


43

Exponent,Alignment

Not data (col. 1)Order?

Different precision

43


44

Organize!

(Units) in parenthesis, no “in”.

Why are proposed schemes in middle?Why are proposed

schemes in middle?

44


45Unnecessary Align on decimal

Put as “unit” Units as second header line

Unnecessary precision, report all to same level

45


46

Exponents: Same, in unit (header)

Tilde instead of dash: Not all journals accept

Not same namesComparison of what?

Is comparison between simulation/expt. relevant?

No vertical lines

46

Sample Table

47

TABLE 1. Dominating contribution (|cia|2) for Δq equal to 1 and 3 of the L mode of

cumulenes, polyynes, Na chains, and dimerized Na chains for different numbers of atoms n. � � � � � � � � �

Cumulenes Polyyenes Na chains Dimerized Na chains

� Δq=1 Δq=3 Δq=1 Δq=3 Δq=1 Δq=3 Δq=1 Δq=3

n= 8 0.94 0.01 0.06 0.99 0.06 0.77 0.77 0.16 n=16 0.95 0.02 0.1 0.99 0.09 0.56 0.56 0.43 n=24 0.93 0.02 0.16 0.98 0.16 0.57 0.57 0.42

!

0.10 or?Same level of precisionUse “n” as header Leave more space

between types than 1/3

47

Sample Table

monitoring [M + H]+ to [M + H - deoxyribose]+ ions basedon the peak areas of [15N3]εdCyd in these two H-SRMtransitions (Figure 1, fourth and sixth panels).

There are a number of enzyme hydrolysis conditions used inthe literature for releasing DNA adducts from double-strandedDNA. We previously reported that different enzyme hydrolysisconditions could affect the efficiency of adduct release fromDNA.29,30 It could be the result of the types and the amounts ofenzymes used. In this study, we compared three enzyme hydroly-sis conditions used for etheno adducts.31–33 Method A was usedfor εdAdo,31 and method B was for εdAdo and εdCyd analysis byLC-ESI/MS/MS.32 Method C was modified from that used foranalyzing εdAdo and εdCyd by the 32P-postlabeling technique33

with the addition of alkaline phosphatase and adenosinedeaminase with the amount used in method A. The formerconverts the adducted nucleotide 3′-monophosphates to thecorresponding nucleosides and the latter transforms normaldAdo into deoxyinsosine, which mostly eluted earlier in theSPE column to minimize interfering with the nanoLC/NSI/MS/MS analysis because dAdo has the same molecular weightas εdCyd. Because the enzyme hydrolysis conditions employedfor 1,N2-εdGuo by Loureiro and co-workers34 used less amountof enzymes and shorter incubation time than those of methodsA-C, it was not included for comparison.

Table 1 summarizes the adduct levels of a human placentalDNA sample measured using methods A, B, and C under theH-SRM conditions described above. It shows that method Areleases 19%-55% more etheno adducts than methods B and Cexcept that the levels of 1,N2-εdGuo measured by method A and

B are similar. In addition, reproducibility of the analysis usingmethod A is generally lower than using methods B and C.Thus, Method A was used throughout this study.

Assay Sensitivity and Calibration. Monitored under theoptimized H-SRM transitions, this nanoLC-NSI/MS/MS assayachieved attomole-level sensitivity with the on-column detectionlimit of 0.73, 160, and 3.4 amol (S/N ) 3) for the respectivestandard εdAdo, εdCyd, and 1,N2-εdGuo. Except εdCyd for whichthe sensitivity was sacrificed to overcome the interferenceproblem, the ultrahigh sensitivity for εdAdo and 1,N2-εdGuowas mainly attributed to the nanoLC system using a 75 µmi.d. column, coupled with the nanospray (or nanoelectrospray)ionization source, by increasing the concentration of the analyteand efficient ionization in the MS. Lowering the columndiameter further is not practical in use because it results inhigh column back pressure. An ultraperformance LC (UPLC)system with sub-2-µm particles in a column with an innerdiameter of 100 µm or smaller coupled with NSI/MS/MS,providing high column resolution with high assay, should bea valuable tool in the field of DNA adduct analysis in whichclinical tissues are limited.

The calibration curves were obtained by mixing a fixed amountof εdAdo, εdCyd, and 1,N2-εdGuo (100 pg each) with variousamounts of standard etheno adducts, going through the C18SPE enrichment, and analyzed by the nanoLC-NSI/MS/MS.The calibration curves demonstrated good linearity with thecorrelation coefficient (R2) of 0.9983, 0.9948, and 0.9984 forεdAdo, εdCyd, and 1,N2-εdGuo, respectively (Figure 3). Thecalibration curves pass through the origin because no analyteswere detectable in the sample containing only the isotopes. Thequantification limit for the entire assay, defined as the lowestamount of analyte showing linearity, was 0.18, 4.0, and 3.4 fmolof εdAdo, εdCyd, and 1,N2-εdGuo, respectively, correspondingto 0.19, 4.2, and 3.6 adducts in 108 normal nucleotides,respectively, starting with 30 µg of DNA (Table 2). The factthat only 2 µL of the reconstituted eluant from the SPE column(in 10 µL) was injected to the LC/MS system contributes to thedifference between detection and quantification limits.

Assay Validation. A control sample containing the threeisotopes only was passed through the SPE column and analyzedto make sure the LC system is clean and the ionization efficiencyof the MS is optimal. A positive control sample was performedthe same way as the real sample except that DNA was omitted. Itcontains the three isotopes, buffers, and hydrolytic enzymes. It

(34) Loureiro, A. P.; Marques, S. A.; Garcia, C. C.; Di Mascio, P.; Medeiros,M. H. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2002, 15, 1302–1308.

Figure 2. Daughter ion scan spectra of εdCyd and [15N3]εdCyd.

Table 1. Levels of εdAdo, εdCyd, and 1,N2-εdGuo inHuman Placental DNA Hydrolyzed by Methods A, B,and C

adducts levels (adducts/108 nucleotides),a,b

mean ± SD (RSD, %)

εdAdo εdCyd 1,N2-εdGuomethod A 27.8 ± 0.2 (0.6%) 44.4 ± 0.7 (1.6%) 8.1 ± 0.2 (3.0%)method B 20.7 ± 1.0 (4.6%) 28.6 ± 0.8 (2.7%) 8.2 ± 0.4 (4.7%)method C 23.3 ± 0.9 (4.1%) 34.4 ± 3.9 (11%) 6.5 ± 0.7 (11%)

a Each experiment started with 30 µg of human placental DNA, andan equivalent of 6 µg of DNA hydrolysate was subjected to the nanoLC-NSI/MS/MS analysis. b Adduct levels are presented as mean ±standard deviation (SD) from triplicate experiments. The percentagestandard deviation (RSD) is expressed in parentheses.

4490 Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 82, No. 11, June 1, 2010

48

b repeats information in header

Capitalize headersCluttered

48

11/4/21

9

Sample Table

encoding scheme is proposed as shown in Fig. 8(d).At most, 186 keys can be stored in a two-level 17-way search tree. The root block encodes 16 keys(16-bit representation of prefixes) without the asso-ciated port numbers. The port numbers correspond-ing to the prefixes in the root block are stored in theunused 2-byte area in the second level. In addition,we also distribute the default port number over theunused area of every second level block. InFig. 8(d), the entries denoted by indices 11P, . . . ,176P are the original unused 2-byte areas that nowstore the port numbers of the 11th, . . . , 176th prefixin the list, respectively, and the default segment portnumber. Since the default port is not stored in theroot block, searches in a 2-level 17-way search treealways take three memory accesses.

The hierarchical structures based on the pro-posed encoding schemes can be extended to morethan 2 levels. As we know, the cache line size canbe 32, 64, or 128 bytes, and the results are shownin Table 1. We briefly describe formats 5, 6, and 7by using the block of size 32 bytes as follows. In for-mat 5, the blocks in all the levels contain 10 prefixesand their associated port numbers. In format 6, onlythe root block which records 16 prefixes with theassociated port numbers are stored in the second-level blocks. In format 7, the root block and the sec-ond-level blocks which contain 16 prefixes withoutassociated port numbers are distributed over thethird-level blocks accordingly.

Default port of a segment. We have shown thatthe delete and insert processes have the worst-casetime complexity of O(N) for a list of N prefixes.Using the 16-bit segmentation table allows us toreduce the worst-case update complexity to O(Nseg),where Nseg, much less than N, is the maximum num-ber of prefixes among all 65,536 segments. The pre-

fixes of length less than or equal to 16 are not usedto generate auxiliary prefixes. The total number ofthe auxiliary prefixes is reduced. Thus, the searchand update performance is improved.

Consider an example in which there are 11 origi-nal prefixes in one segment. Assume that one prefixencloses the other 10 disjoint prefixes. If we use themethod proposed in Section 3 to build the sequen-tial list, 10 auxiliary prefixes at most may be gener-ated, and the total number of prefixes will be 21.Thus, the worst-case number of memory accesseswill be three (one to the segmentation table andtwo to the list), assuming format 2. If we makethe port of the enclosure prefix the default port,no auxiliary prefix is generated. Consider the 32-byte block and format 1. The port and the corre-sponding enclosure prefix can be stored in the Portfield of the segmentation table entry and the unused2-byte area of the root block. The worst-casenumber of memory accesses will be two (one tothe segmentation table and one to the list). Thistechnique can be applied to other formats.

For 32-byte cache lines, the maximum degree ofthe tree in the proposed multiway schemes is 11 or17 depending on whether or not the port numbersare stored along with the prefixes in the memoryblocks. The maximum degree of the tree becomes22 or 33 and 43 or 65 for the cache lines of 64-byteand 128-byte, respectively. This is a big improve-ment over the multiway range search and multiwayrange tree. Notice that the maximum degree of themultiway range tree [22] is smaller than that of themultiway range search because each cache lineneeds to record the heads of the equal list and thespan list. Please refer to the definitions of equaland span lists in [22]. Therefore, the multiway rangetree is deeper than the tree based on the multiway

Table 1The numbers of prefixes in different segment formats

Format Tree level n = Number of entries in the segment Block index/16-bit prefix Port

CLS 32 64

0 0 0 0 0 0 Default port #0 0 1 1 1 Prefix Port #1 1 2 – k1 2–10 2–21 Index Default port #2 2 k1 + 1–CLS 11–32 22 ! 64 Index Default port #3 2 CLS + 1 – (k1 + 1)2 " 1 33–120 65–483 Index n/a4 2 (k1 + 1)2 – (k2 + 1)(k1 + 1) " 1 121–186 484–725 Index n/a5 3 (k2 + 1)(k1 + 1) – (k1 + 1)3 " 1 187–1330 726–10,647 Index n/a6 3 (k1 + 1)3 – (k2 + 1)(k1 + 1)2 " 1 1331–2057 10,648–15,971 Index n/a

CLS = cache line size in bytes, k1 = bCLS/3c, k2 = bCLS/2c.n/a = Not applicable, bxc = floor of value x.

600 Y.-K. Chang / Computer Networks 51 (2007) 588–605

49

Last 2 columns could be in text, poor spacing

Consider centering columns or?

Oops!

49

Sample Table

Table 1 Raw fluorescence signal, measured in pharo multiplier tube counts. The fluorescence intensity is measured from ODs on the PC both when it is in resonance and out of resonance with the incident beam. After subtracting the background in both cases, the enhancement due ro the enhanced near-fields (enhanced excitation) and the enhancement due to coherent scattering (enhance extraction) are determined.

Signal Backgroond Enhancement On PC Off PC On PC (8,) Off PC (B,) (S, - - B,)

10,160.93 + 362.92 705.31 + 8.80

131.78 + 2.91 72.52 + 0.93

336.03 + 9.14 25.33 + 0.89

41.52 + 1.13 21.04 + 0.48

108.89 + 4.09 13.21 + 0.26

50

Make sure all type is readableat the scale it will be printed – this

was in one column, tiny

50

Sample Table

51Can anyone figure out what this is trying to show?

Column header or row headers?

51

Sample Table

Fig. 4. Control block diagram of the static var compensator function.

Fig. 5. DQ coupling current control block diagram for PV-AF-STATCOM system.

III. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS A voltage source PWM inverter, with 6 IGBTs, was

used as the power conversion system of the PV-AF-STATCOM system, and its control was realized with a Texas Instruments DSP. The DSP controller consists of an A/D unit with sampling of voltage and current, a digital PWM unit, and a Phase-Locked-Loop (PLL) unit. The C code based DSP was utilized for implementation of the PV-AF-STATCOM system control. The PWM converter should have a high switching frequency in order to supply accurate compensating currents. The switching frequency of the PV-AF-STATCOM system is 10 kHz. Experiments were carried out to confirm the proposed operating principle. The PWM inverter is controlled with the feedback loops of the output current of inverter, and optimal values of PI gains and filter constants are tuned to obtain proper responses. Harmonic currents were generated by a three–phase diode rectifier with a capacitive load. A dc inductor is directly connected in parallel to the dc side of the diode rectifier. As a result, the diode rectifier, seen from the ac side, can be characterized as a harmonic source.

Table I describes the specifications of PV array used for the experiment. Table II describes the specifications of real built-in hardware for the experiment.

TABLE I SPECIFICATIONS OF THE PV ARRAY

PV array

Rated power 600W Open circuit voltage 150V Short circuit current 7A

Connection 4 (Each 150W)

TABLE II SPECIFICATIONS OF THE PV-AF-STATCOM SYSTEM

PV-AF-

STATCOM

system

Type DC/AC 3-phase inverter

Devices IGBT 6EA Control DSP(TMS320F2812)

Switching Frequency 10kHz

Photovoltaic arrays installed on the top of a building in

Changwon national university is shown in Fig. 6. Fig. 7 shows real built-in full hardware for the experiment of the PV-AF-STATCOM system.

Fig. 8 shows the experimental waveform of utility current including harmonic component when no shunt active filter function is activated, and FFT result of utility current connected to a non-linear load supplied by a three-phase diode rectifier is given in Fig. 9.

Fig. 10 shows the experimental results of the AF function compensating harmonic currents. This case, for an example, corresponds to the operational status of the system under no irradiance condition. The output of inverter has the only compensating harmonic components. The experimental waveform of utility current after operating AF function under nonlinear load condition is shown in Fig. 10. The comparison result of FFT analysis of both cases is given in Fig. 11. It was verified that compensating current eliminates the harmonic currents generated by nonlinear load.

Fig. 6. PV panels installed in Changwon National University.

Fig. 7. Real built-in full hardware of the PV-AF-STATCOM system used for the experiment.

52Common form of table, although could be text

52

Section 24.3

53

53

Title Formats

54

1 2CENTERED Left aligned. Title on same line.

TITLE ON FOLLOWING LINE

SMALL CAPITALS Sentence caseRoman numeral Arabic numeral

No period after number Period after number.Title short, no period Title is long, ends with a period.

1

2

54

11/4/21

10

Title Formats� Compare the title/caption formats in your exemplar

with someone else (preferably a different field)

� Title centered over table or left aligned?� Title on same line as number or following line?� Title in CAPITAL/SMALL CAPITAL or Capital/small� Arabic or Roman numerals? (2 or II)� Punctuation after number? (2 or 2. or 2:)� Period at end of title/caption?

� Same for Table and Figures or different?55

55

Table Title� General principles

� Self-sufficient (summarize what the Table shows)� First word (only) capitalized

� Exceptions: pH, mRNA, etc.� Exceptions: SE, DNA� Exceptions: Sometimes ‘title case’ with small caps

� Positioned above the Table � (Table, Title, Top)

� Follow exemplar articles for number of words, format� Usually brief noun phrase, no verb

56

56

Citationsand

Graphics

Corrections

57

57

Citations� Compare

� Frequency of citations for each component� Tables – are they clear?� Descriptions – do they have a claim, support?

58

58

Using Endnote� Download references� Attach pdfs� Add citations and references to your paper

� Add references to groups (add one to several groups)

59

59

Graphics� Exercise 8.1 Where are the break points past/present?� Exercise 8.2 Where are the equations?

ØExercise 8.3 Where are the graphics?� Table(s) – All articles, one or three tables

� Summary: where you find support from present work� Summarize any important information from 8.1, 8.2� Point to table(s) for 8.3

60

60

11/4/21

11

Corrections/Add to 3 Divisions� Corrections

� Ask about anything you do not understand

� Add sections on Citations, Graphics� Summary paragraph and 1-3 tables for each� Show all exemplars, you decide table format

61

61

62

62

Turn in� Nothing

� Complete descriptions due following week (11/15)

63

63

Complete description (11/15)� Title and author� Overall structure (Exercises 2.1, 3.2)� Component analysis (what is present, where, markers)

� Introduction division (Exercise 4.1)� Method or Process division (Exercise 5.1)� R&D or Testing and Conclusion divisions (Exercise 6.1)

� Support � Past research (Exercise 7.1)� Present research (Exercises 8.1-4, 24.1-3 – as applicable)

� References and citationsFormatted well (headers, titles, table format, …)Remove Track changes, Comments

64

64

Bring� Draft of complete descriptions� One final check before turning in

� Partner� Questions for me or TA

65

65

Read� Chapter 16 Oral presentations

66

66

ee 110-1 b 8 th

Documents