education plaza: online communities of practice for educators
TRANSCRIPT
Education Plaza:Online communities of practice for educators
Tryggvi Thayer6. June, 2016
What I’m going to do...
How do we address educators’ professional development needs in times of increasingly rapid technological and social change?
1. Education Plaza
a. Online communities of practice
2. Samspil 2015
a. Rationale
b. Description of the project
c. Outcomes
d. Recommendations
3. The future for teachers’ professional development
Education Plaza(Menntamiðja - http://menntamidja.is)
Develop and promote new practices for continuing professional development
Support teachers’ CoPs - online and offline
Promote and support digital habitats for CoPs
Social media
Websites
Digital resources
Facilitate and support knowledge sharing
EduCamps
Design workshops
Partners: University of Iceland, Teachers’ Union, City of Reykjavík, Ministry of Education, Federation of Municipalities.
A theoretical lens - Smooth & striated space(Deleuze & Guattari, 1987)
Nomading smooth spaces
Education Plaza seeks to create nomadic spaces
● Smoothing the terrain○ Access to people○ Access to information○ Access to dialogue
● Harnessing the power of the “difference”○ “... information [...] is a difference which makes a difference” (Bateson, 1972).○ IT smoothes the spaces that we inhabit to allow us to identify and explore
differences.
“... difference, and not similarity, [is] the driving force in becoming” (Roy, 2003)
Communities of practice (CoPs) online(Wenger et al, 2009)
CoPs are groups of people with mutual interests who have decided to share their knowledge and experience to facilitate professional development.
Online CoPs use a range of tools to construct digital habitats for constructing, collecting and diffusing knowledge.
CoPs rely on individual members to assume responsibility for roles needed to maintain the digital habitat.
CoPs come and go as needed.
Digital habitats support CoPs
JOINT ENTERPRISEnegotiated enterprise, mutual accountability, interpretations, rhythms, local response
MUTUAL ENGAGEMENTengaged diversity, doing things together, relationships, social complexity, community maintenance
SHARED REPERTOIREstories, styles, artifacts, tools, actions, discourses, concepts, historical events
Samspil 2015:A collaborative teacher-training initiative on ICT for teaching & learning
Target audience:
Teachers and administrators
Teachers at preschool, compulsory and upper-secondary levels
Teachers in all parts of the country
Goal:
Low cost/high impact
Practical knowledge/experience
What can we do within a CoP framework to leverage Education Plaza's existing resources and knowledge?
Samspil 2015: The primary challenge
Exponential rate of technological change!
Samspil 2015: Framing learning needs & goals
Rapid technological and social change raises questions about learning needs.
How does change affect teaching & learning?
How do educational systems react to change?
How do teachers and school leaders react to change?
Goals:
Form dynamic self-sustaining CoPs.
Develop capacity for proactive action with regards to technological change.
Promote forward-looking values and attitudes within communities.
Samspil 2015: Another challengeReaching the appropriate audience:
Adapted from Linda McKeown
Samspil 2015: Addressing the challenges
Address learning needs in a proactive & future-oriented manner:
The past:Facts, history, reality.
The future:Experimental, possibilities, innovation.
Reactive:Look toward the Now from perspective of the past.
Proactive:Look from the Now toward the future.
Samspil 2015: Structure of the course
Samspil 2015: Example of learning activities for 1 month
Samspil 2015: Outcomes
About 350 participants
Very positive reactions
Majority claims to have “learned a lot”
Keen interest in maintaining community
Have energized previously existing communities
New knowledge-sharing practices diffused
EduCamps are very popular
New blogs about education
Increased activity on social media
Sense of community
We’re all engaged in a constant learning process
Easier to locate relevant knowledge
Platforms for those who want to share
Samspil 2015: Pros & cons of our approach
Pros Cons
● Able to cover broad range of topics.
● Dynamic resources emerge in the learning process.
● Learn anytime, anywhere.
● Connect with learners where they are.
● FUN, FUN, FUN!
● Too long?
● Hard to keep everyone engaged.
● Requires a lot of work.
● Local contacts not all engaged.
● When do instructors disengage?
● How do we measure outcomes?
● Some never really got how the programme was intended to work.
What would I change?
More emphasis on local networks.
Split into series of 3 month long courses.
Make better use of “meatspace”/more face-to-face opportunities.
Better monitoring of learners.
Higher price tag.
What next for online CoPs?
Need to use digital resources for professional development. There is no other realistic way to stay up-to-date.
Current online CoPs:
Sharing knowledge & experience on social platforms.
Access to broad range of resources.
Digital agents help diffuse information.
Future CoPs:
Creative communities interacting in digital spaces.
Virtual & augmented reality to construct new environments.
Artificial intelligence analyzes learning needs.
Artificial intelligence produces information.
CoP engaged in constructing visions for the future.