ed 353 032 jc 930 067 title institution pub … · 40z fte generated 83.72 159.23 178.24 159.83...
TRANSCRIPT
DOCUMENT RESUME
ED 353 032 JC 930 067
TITLE Hunt Club Satellite Center Three Part Analysis.INSTITUTION Seminole Community Coll., Sanford, Fla.PUB DATE Jun 92NOTE 55p.PUB TYPE Reports Research/Technical (143) Statistical
Data (110)
EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage.DESCRIPTORS College Credits; Community Characteristics; Community
Colleges; Credit Courses; Full Time Equivalency;*Institutional Characteristics; Noncredit Courses;Program Descriptions; *Satellite Facilities; *StudentCharacteristics; Two Year Colleges; Two Year CollegeStudents
IDENTIFIERS *Seminole Community College FL
ABSTRACTConsisting primarily of data tables and charts, this
report on the Hunt Club Center (HCC) at Seminole Community College(SCC) in Sanford, Florida, presents information on course offeringsand full-time equivalency (FTE) production for academic years 1987-88through 1991-92; HCC area demographics; and student characteristicsduring fall terms 1990 and 1991, respectively. Study findings includethe following: (1) the majority of courses, student enrollments, andFTE generation at HCC are for college credit; (2) college creditcourses have had a greater enrolled class size than noncreditclasses; (3) though sporadic, growth at HCC has been fueled primarilyby evening classes; (4) generally, student FTE's increase in responseto increases in course offerings; (5) HCC is located close to thehighest growth areas in Orange and Seminole counties; (6) while thelower income areas of Orange county may resemble the more traditionalsources of community college students, such areas have a much smallerpopulation than their Seminole county equivalents, and targetingthese Orzage county areas may limit enrollment growth potential; (7)
over 25% of HCC enrolled students are attending on a full-time basisand are enrolled in college-credit courses; (8) approximately 50% ofHCC students also attend SCC; (9) in all typas of courses, HCCstudents generated more FTE at HCC than at SCC; (10) the majority ofHCC college credit and college preparatory students enrolledexclusively in evening classes, while the majority of continuingeducation and vocational/technical students enrolled exclusively inday classes; and (11) the HCC student body has a greater percentagesof white students than SCC. (PAA)
***********************************************************************
Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made* from the original document.************************************: c*** ****** *** * ********* ******* *****
5
.
1
1°I cn
SEMINOLE COMMUNITY COLLEGE
HUNT CLUB SATELLITE CENTERTHREE PART ANALYSIS
IAR JUNE 1992
"PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THISMATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY
A. P. Donsky
TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCESINFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)
BEST COPY MIELE
2
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONOffice 01 Eaucattonat Research and improvement
EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATIONCENTER tERICIr has been reproduced as
recened trom the person or OrpanilafiOn
C Minor changes bane been made to improvereproduction qualay
Points 01 mew Or opavons stated in th,sdocuwent do not necessarily represent of I.c.aiOEMpOsdonOrPohey
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PART I
Hunt Club in number of courses, students, and FTE generation ispredominately college credit.
- College credit courses have been more successful in percentagethat run and in enrolled class size.
- Primarily fueled by evening credit classes, Hunt Center growthhas been sporadic.
Generally, FTE increased in response to increased courseofferings.
PART II
- Hunt Club Center is positioned close to the highest growth areasin Orange and Seminole counties.
The lower income Orange county areas may resemble the moretraditional sources of community college students. However thesetracts have a much smaller population than their Seminole Countyequivalents and may limit growth potential.
PART III
- HC has primarily college credit and college preparatoryenrollments, with over one-fourth full-time college-creditstudents.
- Around 50% of the college credit and college preparatory studentsattend both Hunt Club and the main campus.
- HC students in all course types earn more FTE at HC than at maincampus.
- A very small percentage of adult/continuing ed andvocational/technical students attend both campuses.
- Majority of College credit/college preparatory students enrolledexclusively in evening classes.
Majority of adult/continuing eel and vocational/technical studentsenrolled exclusively in day classes. many of thevocational/tecnical students older women.
- Larger white HC student population and fewer blacks and Spanish,percentage-wise, than SCC as a whole.
HC student females outnumber males by a higher percentage thanSCC as a whole.
PART ICOURSE OFFERINGS AND FTE PRODUCTION
4
FORWARD
The following represents a summary of the enrollment patterns at
the Hunt Club Center. It is based on class enrollment filesaccessed in February of 1992 which display class enrollments backto Term III of 1986-87. ( The Center opened in Term II of 86-87.)It should be remembered that any changes made to these files since86-87 will be reflected in this data and make the data slightlydifferent from the original information. For the purposes of thiswork,though,the analysis represents an accurate portrayalof enrollment history.
The data presented in this study reflects four full year's
experience at the Center plus a portion of 91-92 (through February4, 1992). It is anticipated that this work will be followed up bya demographic analysis.
SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS
- Four course types have been offered at the Hunt Club Center:College Credit, College Preparatory, Adult & ContinuingEducation, and Vocation/Technical.
The total number of courses initially offered at the Centerin the period from 1987-88 to 1990-91 has a range of 367 to425. In 1991-92 the number offered as of February 4, 1992 was407, a drop from the 1990-S1 figure of 425. (Although the numbermay rise by the end of the report year.) (see table 2)
College Credit courses as of February 1992 represent over 70%of the FTE produced at the Center which has grown steadily froma low of 58% in 1988-89. The dominance of College Credit is morestriking with evening courses as opposed to day. (see table 4)
The tendency has been to increase the number of College Creditcourses initially offered each year relative to the other coursetypes, particularly in evening classes/Fall terms. (see table 3)
From 1987-88 to 1989-90, when there have been more initial courseofferings, the final FTE generated has also increased. This didnot occur in 1990-91, or thus far in 1991-92, although the impactof the number of offered courses on FTE production and coursecancellation will not be clear until the end of '91-92. (seetable 1)
In' only two of the five years examined have the number of initialday course offerings or evening course offerings increased overthe previous year. (see table 1)
Despite fluctuations in number of course offerings and FTE outputat the Hunt Club, its yearly FTE as a percentage of the total FTEof SCC has remained relatively constant at the 5% rangeafter the first full year of operation (starting in '88-89.)(see table 1)
Discounting College Prep (which represents only a small number ofcourses taught at the Center),from 1989-90 to present,CollegeCredit courses run in the evening have had the highest percentageof courses offered that ran. (see table 2)
Discounting College Prep (which represents only a :mall number ofstudents), from 19e7-88 to present College Credit has had alarger percentage of enrolled over potential students in eveningcourses relative to the other course types. (see table 5)
After the initial year of 1987-88, the cost per FTE has decreasedthrough 1989-90, but increased in 1990-91. When available, the1991-92 cost data will indicate whether this rise is a trend.(see table 6)
OBSERVATIONS
The Hunt Club Center, since its inception, appears to have beenfueled by evening Credit Courses. The growth has been somewhatsporadic as opposed to a straight linear increase. With theexception of 1990-91, the Center has increased FTE in response toincreased course offerings. The demographic portion of theanalysis should provide additional information.
HUNT CLUB REPORT
SUMMARY
YEAR TOTALS
Table 1
1987-88
1988-89
1989-90
1990-91
1991 -92
(Thru
2/04/92)
All Hunt Club Course Types'
# of Day Courses Offered
211
244
247
260
229
# of Day Courses Ran
128
188
195
195
163
Z of Day Courses Offered Ran
61Z
77%
79%
75X
7IZ
# of Possible Students
5768
6103
6734
6354
6023
il of Enrolled Students
1629
3000
3296
2872
2429
Z of Possible Students Enrolled
28Z
49Z
49X
452
40Z
FTE Generated
83.72
159.23
178.24
159.83
141.29
# of Evening Courses Offered
156
132
166
165
178
# of Evening Courses Ran
131
113
139
135
151
X of Evening Courses Offered Ran
04X
86Z
84X
82%
85%
# of Possible Students
3890
3390
4377
3952
4547
I of Enrolled Students
2008
1864
2401
2190
2478
% of Possible Students Enrolled
522
552
552
552
542
FTE Generated
99.4
116.89
148.61
144.32
162.05
Total H C FTE
183.12
276.12
326.85
304.15
303.34
Total SCC FTE
5487.59
5944.81
5895.38
5948.6
5886.03
2 of Total HE Generated by H C
32
5%
62
52
52
8
Amounts may not total due to rcunding
Source' Daily FTE's run February, 1992
8E51
CO
PY
RUNT CLUB REPORT
COURSES
bunt Club Day Courses'
College Credit
College Preparatory
Adult t Continuing Education
Vocatienal/Technical
TOTAL N C Oily Courses
Nunt Club Evening Courses'
College Credit
College "'reparatory
Adult & Continuing (Melon
Vocatlonal/Technic.1
TOTAL N C Evening Courses
bunt Clvb Day & Evening Courses'
College Credit
College Preparatory
Adult 4 Continuing Education
Vocatimil/Tethnical
TOTAL All M C Courses
1 0
Table 2
TEAR TOTALS
1917.18
1988-89
1989-90
1990-91
1991-92
(Theo
2/04/921
Number
Number
% of
Number
Number
% of
Number
Number
at of
Number
Number
1 of
Number
Number
.% of
Offered
Ran
Offered
Offered
Ran
Offered
Offered
Ran
Offered
Offered
Ran
Offered
Offered
Ran
Offered
Ran
Ran
Ran
Ron
Ran
101
51
500
86
60
700
12
71
772
97
73
752
102
/8
761
54
800
64
671
32
670
32
671
33
1001
51
25
410
49
42
860
66
52
790
70
57
810
60
34
570
54
48
891
103
82
800
86
70
811
90
63
700
64
48
750
211
121
611
244
188
Pt
247
195
790
260
1,5
751
229
163
711
75
58
772
95
11
852
111
98
881
115
102
891
121
(04
861
00
02
11
1002
44
1000
33
1001
88
1000
25
20
801
21
18
862
31
22
711
25
18
720
16
12
751
56
53
951
15
13
870
20
15
752
22
12
551
33
27
820
156
131
141
132
113
Ili%
166
139
141
165
135
820
178
151
851
176
109
621
161
141
782
203
169
832
212
175
830
223
182
820
54
801
75
712
76
862
65
831
11
11
1000
74
45
51t
70
60
861
97
74
740
95
75
790
76
46
410
110
101
920
118
95
11R
106
85
800
112
75
670
91
/5
771
367
259
711
316
301
BOX
413
334
Ill
425
330
782
407
314
771
1Sovrcel
Osily FTE's rum February, 1992)
BE
ST C
CM
,rr:
HU
NT
CLU
B R
EP
OR
TC
CO
XE
S O
FF
ER
ED
9.11
1131
FA
LL T
ER
MS
WIN
TE
R T
ER
ttS
Able 3
TE
RI
TE
RI
Mr
TE
MM
IT
EM
TE
MT
IMT
art
MO
Mel
Tan
Mr1
TE
MT
ER
IT
DM
alT
ER
IT
ER
riT
EM
863
173
183
193
903
864
874
684
194
904
171
881
891
901
911
872
882
892
902
912
(T)v
4
2/04
/92)
Amber of Day Courses Offered:
Col
lege
Cre
dit
ZS
1622
2323
128
68
931
2929
3135
3333
35
35
35
Col
lege
I -e
para
tory
11
00
01
00
00
33
21
10
21
Adu
lt &
Con
tinui
ng E
duca
tion
1014
2022
la0
00
00
1516
202z
1626
1926
26
Voc
atio
nal/T
echn
ical
3534
2733
270
00
00
2523
2125
2511
1035
3212
TO
TA
L H
.C. D
ay C
ours
es51
6569
7$61
131
6S
974
77
7579
77
7394
9795
75
*abe
t of P
ealn
; Cou
rses
Offe
red:
Col
lege
Cre
dit
1517
2527
V7
79
1210
7732
3637
4526
3911
3939
Col
lege
Pre
para
tory
00
00
20
00
00
01
22
30
02
13
Adu
lt &
Con
tinui
ng E
duca
tion
72
106
70
00
0o
a9
1010
s10
10It
94
Voc
atio
nal/T
echn
ical
206
22
30
00
00
20
6a
87
163
912
z)
TO
TA
L H
.C. E
veni
ng C
ours
es42
2538
3539
77
912
1055
4856
5760
5252
6361
69
16a
bet o
f Tot
al S
C C
ours
es O
ffere
d;C
olle
ge C
redi
t40
.33
47S
O50
1915
1520
1958
6165
6880
5971
7674
74
Col
lege
Pre
para
tory
11
00
21
00
00
34
43
40
23
35
Adu
lt &
Con
tinui
ng E
duca
tion
1716
3028
250
00
00
2325
3032
2136
1937
3530
Voc
atio
nal/T
echn
ical
3540
3035
300
00
00
4535
3233
3230
4344
44
35
TO
TA
L A
LL H
.C. C
ours
es93
9210
711
310
720
1515
2019
129
125
131
136
137
125
146
160
156
114
Sou
rce:
Dai
ly F
TE
's r
un F
ebru
ary,
199
2
12,
ts,
J. 43
BE
ST C
EO
r,-1
HU
NT
CL
UB
RE
POR
T
FIE
?M
ED
Hun
t Clu
b D
ay C
ours
es:
Col
lege
Cre
dit
Col
lege
Pre
para
tory
Adu
lt &
Con
tinui
ng E
duca
tion
Voc
al io
nal/T
echn
ical
TO
TA
L H
.C. D
ay C
ours
es
Hun
t Clu
b E
veni
ng C
ours
es:
Col
lege
Cre
dit
Col
lege
Pre
para
tory
Adu
lt et
Con
tinui
ng E
duca
tion
Voc
atio
nal/T
echn
ical
TO
TA
L H
.C. E
veni
ng C
ours
es
Hun
t Clu
b D
ay &
Eve
ning
Cou
rses
:C
olle
ge C
redi
tC
olle
ge P
repa
rato
ryA
duh&
Con
tinui
ngE
duca
tion
Voc
atio
nal/T
echn
ical
TO
TA
L A
LLH.C.
Cou
rses
Ste
1017
2. F
IE
14
Table 4
TE
M T
OT
AL
S
1987
4419
8849
1989
-90
1990
-91
1991
.92
(Thru
2104
192)
rrs
%of
%of
Fri
96 o
fX
of
FIE
15 o
f%
of
FTE
% o
t%
of
ra%
ofit
of
Tra
duce
d IN
K C
lab
All
Prod
uced
Hun
t Clu
bA
llPr
oduc
edHunt Club
All
Prod
uced
Hun
t Clu
bA
llPr
oduc
edH
unt C
lub
All
Tot
alSCC
Total
SCC
Total
SCC
Total
SCC
Total
SCC
42.6
83.
0723
%1%
61.0
922
%1%
86.6
1X
%It
85.4
828
11%
78.6
526
1it
14.55
21 8%
0%3.
811
012.
8it
0%2.
73It
0%2.93
it0%
23.42
13%
0%
68.81
25%
1%
71.37
2I1
1%
56.96
191
it
49.06
161.
It
43.72
46%
0%
25.53
9%
0t.
17.46
5%
01
14.66
5%
01
10.65
4%
Ot
2%
159.23
581
3%
178.24
55%
3%
159.83
531
3%
141.29
47%
21
66.51 0
36%
0%
1%
0%
100.17
36%
2%
130.46
401
2%
126.82
421
2%
143.99
471
2%
5.03
3%
1.73
1%
0%
5.74
21
0%
5.07
A0%
7.73
3%
Ot
27.86
15%
Ot 1%
4.16
2%0%
5.36
2%
0%
6.43
2%
Ot
4.1
it
01
99.4
54%
2%
10.83
116.19
4%
42%
0%
2%
7.05
148.61
2%
451
01 31
6
144.32
2%
471
01 2%
6.23
162.05
21
531
Ot
31
109.
193.07
19.58
51.2
8
60% 21
111
284
2% 0% 0% 11
261.
265.53
72.17
58% 2%
26%
3% 0% it
'
217.
078.54
76.73
66% 3%
23%
it 01 1%
212.
37.8
63.39
Mt
lt
214
4% 0% 1%
222.
6410
.66
53.16
73% 4t 18%
il 01 1%
1111.12
1001
3%
3636
276.12
131
11
24.51
7%
0%
20.66
71
0%
16.68
6%
eft
100
Si
126.85
1001
6%
304.15
1001
5%
303.34
1004
S%
5487
.59
5944
.81
5195
.38
5948
.658
86.0
3
Sour
ce: D
aily
FT
E's
run
Feb
ruar
y, 1
992
17ST
'"11
r A
NIA
,ilk
LE
HU
NT
CL
UB
RE
POR
TD
INO
LU
IDIT
S
7D.1
1 T
OM
S
Table 5
Hun
t Clu
b D
ay C
ours
es:
Col
lege
Cre
dit
Col
lege
Pre
para
tory
Adu
lt &
Con
tinui
ng E
duca
tion
Voc
atio
nal/T
echn
ical
TO
TA
L H
.C. D
ay C
ours
es.
____
_
Hun
t Clu
b E
veni
ng C
ours
es:
Col
lege
Cre
dit
Col
lege
Pre
para
tory
Adu
lt &
Con
tinui
ng E
duca
tion
Voc
atio
nal/T
echn
ical
TO
TA
L H
.C. E
veni
ng C
ours
er
Hun
t Clu
b D
ay &
Eve
ning
Cou
rses
:C
olle
ge C
redi
tC
olle
ge P
repa
rato
ryA
dult
& C
ontin
uing
Edu
catio
nV
ocat
ivru
d/T
echn
ical
TO
TA
L A
LL
H.C
. Cou
rses
1937
-00
Enrollments
Amber
% of
Possible Enrolled Possible
Enrolled
1988
49
Enrollments
Number
% of
Possible Enrolled Possible
Enrolled
1919
-90
1990
-91
Enrollments
Number
% of
Enrollments
Fossiple Enrolled Possible
Possible
Enrolled '
Number
Enrolled
t of
Possible
Enrolled
1991
-92
Mtn
2/O4t92)
Enrollments
Possible
Nunber
Enrolled
a of
Possible
Enrolled
2923 24
1477
1244
5763 75 0
677
1250
2002
2998
.
124
2154
2494
7770
569
46
314
700
1329 Se
0
303
1113
1171 62
746
622
1513
2K01
19%
37%
21%
56%
28%
771 0% 45%
65%
5% 21%
371
79%
61%
368
2216 109
1592
2186
6103 95 25 54
234
1
1003
2311 13
4
2134
2517
7106
311 57 776
1356
3000 31 26 34
3
131
542
192 $3
1118
1488
3532
37%
52%
4% 621
49%
8% 3041
63%
39%
5.8% 39%
62%
521
59%
50%
2455
1157
471
2327
6542
658
71
2362
955
40%
2096
1032
1142
6%18
60.
6731
32%
4%63
54
111
9838
811
5
92es
93%
79
779
342
44%
636
450
199
441
463
1432
725
51%
1293
2566
1255
491
2442
157
128
82%
150
3161
1297
41%
2732
2282
1341
5%23
2311
6640
214%
7647
1146 41 81
487
1
2872 10
2 76 258
113
549
1248 117
1072 98
4
3421
491
sat
39%
47%
45t
891
96%
41%
24t
421
51%
781
rt.
411
45%
2695 75
1875
1378
6023 12
1
199
425
710
1455
2816 27
4
23C
0
208.
8
7470
1057 69
716
507
2429 10
4
182
172
1% 654
1161 25
1
6811
703
3483
3% 9A yrt
41%
401.
Mt
911
401
281
45% 411
921
34-1
1
381
41%
Sour
ce: D
aily
FT
E's
run
Feb
ruar
y, 1
992 BE
ST C
OO
Table 6
HUNT CLUBFTE/COST SHEET
YEAR
FTE (TOTAL)
PERSONNEL
COST ft
CURR EXP. CAPITAL TOTAL
COST FTE
81-88 183.12 229812 107985 3162 340959 1861.9
88-89 276.12 247633 139394 387027 1401.7
89-90 326.85 255174 148596 2089 405859 1241.7
90-91 304.15 235881 157060 6020 398961 1311.1
91-92 303.34 NOT YET AVAILABLE
(THRU 2-4-92)
# BASED OH REPORT YEAR TERM 3 SUMMER THRU TERM 2 WINTER
BASED OH FISCAL YEAR JULY 1- JUNE 30 AND INCLUDES ONLY THOSE COSTS FOUND IN HUNT CLUB COST CENTER
PART IIHUNT CLUB AREA DEMOGRAPHICS
tY
SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS
The following represents an analysis of the population areas inSeminole and Orange counties that surround the Hunt Club SatelliteCenter. The data are represented in census tracts(the smallestdivisions for which such information is available) cross walked tozip codes and towns. The source of the information is the MarketProfile Analysis prepared by Donnelley Marketing InformationServices in 1990 and is based on 1990 estimates as opposed toactual 1990 Census data. We estimate the error factor to be slight.
The map representation displays the census tracts surrounding HuntClub in the form of a rectangle enclosing parts of Seminole andOrange. Chart 1 contains the data for the Seminole target tractsand is followed by Chart 2 s-hich describes the characteristics ofall of the 45 Seminole County Tracts. In the same way, Chart 3lists the Orange County Tracts in question and is followed by Chart4 containing all of the Orange County tracts. The following pointscan be made relative to the data:
Relative to Seminole and Orange
(1) While both the surrounding Orange and Seminole countypopulations share the same age range ( median age of approximately30 1980) the median household income of the Seminole tracts in 1990was higher than the Orange county ones. In addition, while thetarget tracts in both counties had high growth rates between 1980and 90, the high growth tracts in Seminole had substantially largerpopulations than the high growth ones in Orange(see Charts 1 and3).
Seminole County Specifically
(2) 3 of the 4 Seminole county census tracts surrounding Hunt Clubwere in the top 20% of all Seminole census tracts showing growthbetween 1980 and 1990(see Chart 1 and Chart 2).
(3) 2 of the 4 target tracts were within the top 10% of medianhousehold income for all Seminole tracts in 1990(see Chart 1 andChart 2).
(4) 3 of the 4 surrounding tracts were within the top 20% of 1980median age for all Seminole tracts(see Chart 1 and Chart 2).
Orange County Specifically
(5) 6 of the 10 Orange county census tracts surroundi g Hunt Clubwere in the top 20% of all Orange census tracts s7 ing growthbetween 1980 and 1990(see Chart 3 and Chart 4).
(6) The 6 high growth census tracts were in the top 40% of median
household income for all Orange tracts in 1990(see Chart 3 andChart 4).
(7) The 6 high growth census tracts were within the top 20% of 1980median age for all Orange tracts)see chart 3 and Chart 4).
Observations
The Hunt Club Satellite Center is positioned close to the highestgrowth areas in Orange and Seminole counties (1980-90). From acommunity college marketing standpoint, the lower income, Orangecounty areas adjoining Hunt Club may resemble the more traditionalsource of community college students. However these tracts have amuch smaller population than their Seminole county equivalents andmay therefore limit growth potential.
09 .4v1
.
Cen
sus
trac
ts s
urro
undi
ng th
e H
unt
Clu
b sa
telli
te c
ente
r
Sanf
ord
Lak
e M
178.
216.
021
r-S
emin
ole
Cun
ty17
717
8.03
176 17
5.02
217.
01H
unt C
lub
217.
0217
5.01
151.
02 1
51.0
1 15
2.01
155.
01
ran
eou
n
BE
ST C
OPY
AV
AIL
AB
I r
(1. r C
.)
SEMINOLE COUNTY CENSUS TRACTS SURROUNDING HUNT CLUB
%
TRACT TOO ZIP POPULATION
INCREASE
80-90
CHART 1
RANK OF
INC REL
TO OTHER 1990
TRACKS(45) POPULATION
MEDIAN HOUSE-
HOLD INCOME
1990
MEDIAN
MEDIAN
RANK
AGE
1980
MEDIAN RANK
(216.07)
(216.08)
216.03 ALTAMONTE SPG 32701 129% 5 19578 46031 6 31 9
ALTAMONTE SPG 32714
APOPKA 32703
LONGROOD 32750
LONGWOOD 32779
(216.04)
(216.05)
(216.06)
216.02 ALTAMONTE SPG 32701 95% 10 23818 60169 4 31 9
ALTAMONTE SPG 3714
APOPKA 32703
APOPKA 32712
CASSELBERRY 32708
LONGPOOD 32750
LONR403D 32779
(217.04)
(217.03)
217.01 ALTAMONTE SPG 32701 127% 6 11772 38760 15 32 8
ALTAMONTE SPG 32714
APOPKA 32703
APOPKA 32712
217.02 ALTAMONTE SPG 32701 15% 30 9586 37362 16 27 13
ALTAMONTE SPG 32714
MAITLAND 32751
ORLANDO 32809.
ORLANDO 32810
ORLANDO 32824
',Reflects Seminole County resider_es with Orange County Zip Codes
BEST COPY Atu../:7 E
CHART 2
SEMINOLE
CENSUS PERCENT
TRACK INCREASE RANK
MEDIAN
HCUSE
INCCIIE Rank
MEDIAN
1980
AGE RANK
213.01 192% 1 61761 2 33 7
208.01 182% 2 36173 17 35 5
208.02 138% 3 40155 11 30 10
216.01 136% 4 74623 1 32 8
216.03 129% 5 46031 6 31 9
217.01 127% 6 38760 15 32 8
214.02 111% 7 40348 10 30 10
214.01 110% 8 38985 14 30 10
201.01 109% 9 12830 43 42 3
216.02 95% 10 60169 4 31 9
212.01 91% 11 32080 23 35 5
222.02 84% 12 43665 8 33 7
212.02 80% 13 31190 25 33 7
205 75% 14 12353 44 23 14
221.02 73% 15 41240 9 30 10
209.03 67% 16 29790 27 29 11
215.03 59% 17 32686 22 35 5
219.01 58% 18 39087 13 34 6
210 49% 19 27830 31 33 7
218.01 48% 20 44905 7 34 6
206 46% 21 28520 29 36 4
207 44% 22 35121 19 33 7
213.03 44% 23 33160 21 34 6
211 43% 24 13200 42 27 13
209.02 36% 25 25000 33 31 9
215.04 27% 26 61403 3 34 6
215.02 27% 27 33202 20 27 13
215.01 25% 28 49058 5 31 9
220.01 24% 29 18826 38 28 12
217.02 15% 30 37362 16 27 13
209.01 12% 31 24798 35 28 12
202.02 11% 32 24959 34 29 11
221.01 9% 33 24762 36 35 5
203.02 9% 34 25275 32 31 9
213.02 9% 35 25275 32 32 8
218.02 5% 36 29241 28 32 8
219.02 5% 37 15966 41 32 8
203.01 3% 38 28057 30 43 2
220.02 3% 39 35553 18 35 5
202.01 1% 40 21744 37 47 1
204.01 0% 41 17374 40 29 11
201.02 -10% 42 18550 39 33 7
204.02 -14% 43 31666 24 28 12
220.03 -17% 44 39483 12 34 6
222.01 -18% 45 30839 26 35 5
33623.44 32.35555
CHART 3
ORANGE COUNTY CERSUS TRACTS SURROUNDING HUNT CLUB
TRACT TOWN
%
ZIP POPULATION
INCREASE
80-90
RANK OF
INC REL
TO OTHER 1990
TRACKS( 117) POPULATION
MEDIAN HOUSE
HOLD INCOME
1990
MEDIAN
MEDIAN
RANK
AGE
1980
MEDIAN RANK
177 APOPKA 32703 92 18 6996 32065 49 32 20
32712
178.03 APOPKA 32703 127% 9 8958 31494 52 27 25
32712
176 APOPKA 32703 34% 38 7101 18339 107 24 28
32712
175.02 APOPKA 32703 108% 14 8120 28849 64 29 23
32712
175.01 APOPKA 32703 36% 37 4521 21557 95 25 27
ORLANDO 32818
178.02 APOPKA 32703 100% 15 3632 35128 36 35 17
32712
PLYMOUYH 32768
151.01 ORLANDO 32808 66% 24 9748 32178 47 30 22
32810
32919
151.02 ORLANDO 32809 85% 19 4770 27527 71 30 22
32818
32808
32810
APOPKA 32703
152.01 ORLANDO 32810 37% 36 2883 29482 60 30 22
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS 32714*
ORLANDO 32805
MAITLAND 32751
155.01 MAITLAND 32751 -2% 60 4001 44614 12 34 18
*Reflects Orange County residences with Altamonte Springs Zip Code
6
CHART 4
ORANGE
CENSUS PERCENT
TRACK INCREASE RANK
MEDIAN
HOUSE
INCOME RANK
MEDIAN
1980
AGE RANK
148.03 253% 1 51116 7 31 21
170 252% 2 37236 28 28 24
146.03 236% 3 30632 56 26 26
171.02 234% 4 40784 18 34 18
164.01 208% 5 32119 48 26 26
124 170% 6 39050 23 30 22
167.01 162% 7 38185 25 29 23
148.01 147% 8 18679 106 32 20
178.03 127% 9 31494 52 27 25
135.01 124% 10 27768 67 28 24
136.01 123% 11 36623 30 29 23
167.02 118% 12 32974 42 26 26
164.03 116% 13 36299 32 28 24
175.02 108% 14 28849 64 29 23
178.02 100% 15 35128 36 35 17
148.02 99% 16 43375 13 33 19
135.02 99% 16 26156 74 36 16
167.04 97% 17 38682 24 31 21
177 92% 18 32065 49 32 20
151.02 85% 19 27527 71 30 22
165.02 85% 19 24860 80 24 28
165.01 75% 20 21666 94 24 28
150 73% 21 25143 79 26 26
167.03 71% 22 34312 38 30 22
173 67% 23 21849 93 30 22
151.01 66% 24 32178 47 30 22
149.02 66% 24 27941 66 33 19
104 59% 25 10663 115 26 26
134.01 55% 26 30748 54 27 25
106 54% 27 13017 113 28 24
155.02 46% 28 21959 91 23 29
133 45% 29 34933 37 31 21
123 44% 30 37773 27 28 24
132 43% 31 29413 61 33 19
147 42% 32 22278 89 27 25
146.01 41% 33 23791 84 21 30
149.01 41% 33 33592 40 31 21
156.01 39% 34 64082 3 40 12
157.02 38% 35 48113 9 37 15
152.01 37% 36 29482 60 30 22
171.01 36% 37 32740 44 29 23
168.01 36% 37 19541 100 26 26
178.01 36% 37 22862 88 28 24
179 36% 37 22109 90 34 18
136.02 36% 37 33355 41 29 23
175.01 36% 37 21557 95 25 27
166 36% 37 23605 85 31 21
139 30% 38 35766 33 36 16
176 34% 38 18339 107 24 28
2:1
CHART 4
ORANGE
CENSUS PERCENT
TRACK INCREASE RANK
MEDIAN
HOUSE
INCOME RANK
MEDIAN
1980
AGE RANK
141 28% 39 40466 19 35 17
169.01 31% 39 28995 63 26 26
171.03 31% 39 42500 14 33 19
162 23% 40 52728 5 36 16
172 21% 41 20172 97 33 19
117.01 21% 41 18852 103 25 27
103 20% 42 18795 104 48 4
146.02 17% 43 29916 58 21 30
107.01 14% 44 70224 1 49 3
125 12% 45 30812 53 48 4
174 12% 45 21354 96 31 21
113 11% 46 27414 72 36 16
102 11% 46 19182 101 35 17
108.02 10% 47 23097 87 41 11
138 9% 48 41302 17 33 19
119.01 9% 48 18707 105 23 29
137 8% 49 25749 77 29 23
107.02 8% 49 31703 51 43 9
118 7% 50 24559 81 32 20
129 7% 50 36592 31 48 4
130.02 7% 50 27646 69 27 25
158.02 7% 50 45995 11 41 11
112 6% 51 37842 26 40 12
161 6% 51 42012 16 49 3
127.01 5% 52 30076 57 40 12
164.02 4% 53 28684 65 31 21
126 3% 54 31877 50 47 5
159.01 3% 54 14080 112 30 22
158.01 3% 54 55163 4 46 6
111 2% 55 40050 20 42 10
128 2% 55 49427 8 45 7
144 2% 55 4000) 21 44 8
140 2% 55 52468 6 35 17
160.02 1% 56 46250 10 47 5
130.01 0% 57 N/A 117 20 31
117.02 0% 57 19898 99 25 27
121 -1% 58 26083 75 35 17
109 -2% 59 17611 109 53 2
156.02 -2% 59 68468 2 37 15
155.01 -2% 59 44614 12 34 18
131 -3% 60 36973 29 34 18
108.01 -3% 60 26437 73 34 18
116 -6% 61 24245 82 28 24
101 -7% 62 9653 116 45 7
152.02 -8% 63 32707 45 29 23
127.02 -8% 63 19955 98 35 17
145 -8% 63 27597 70 29 23
134.02 -8% 63 35323 35 28 24
153 -9% 64 27755 68 38 14
o0
CHART 4
ORANGE
MEDIAN MEDIAN
CENSUS PERCENT HOUSE 1980
TRACK INCREASE RANK 1NCO1E RANK AGE RANK
115 -9% 64 15822 111 29 23
122 -9% 64 42105 15 30 22
160.01 -10% 65 29090 62 28 24
114 -11% 66 17021 110 37 15
143.01 -12% 67 32844 43 30 22
105 -12% 67 12006 114 32 20
157.01 -12% 67 39417 22 45 7
142 -12% 67 35413 34 27 25
154.02 -13% 68 23587 86 37 15
120 -13% 68 34056 39 27 25
143.02 -13% 68 25235 78 28 24
163.02 -14% 69 29627 59 27 25
168.02 -15% 70 26081 76 23 29
159.02 -18% 71 18892 102 56 1
169.02 -19% 72 32644 46 28 24
154.01 -19% 72 23858 83 26 26
110 -23% 73 17931 108 33 19
163.01 -24% 74 30727 55 39 13
119.02 -25% 75 21923 92 31 21
117 30715.34 32.70940
PART IIISTUDENT PROFILE
Part I and II of the Hunt Club study dealt with course offeringsand FTE production, and Hunt Club area demographics, respectively.Part III develops the Hunt Club student profile.
For Part III, IAR Office looked at two representative terms, FallTerm of 1990-1991 and 1991-92.
- Generally, the changes in racial/ethnic mix at Hunt Club (HC) inthe two terms were minor. HC's racial/ethnic mix does notreflect the same pattern as Seminole Community College as awhole. See Tables 1 and 2.
Within course type, vocational/technical had a higher percentageof females.
Females account for 69% of the total HC enrollment, compared to54% for the entire college in Term 911 and 52% in Term 901.
Hunt Club has had a higher percentage of white enrollment(86% at HC in Term 911 and 87% in Term 901 compared to 80% forall of SCC.) Fewer blacks are represented with 3% at HC in bothterms compared to 7% total SCC.
- Though percentages changed between the two terms, consistently alarger percentage of HC college credit students enrolled in HCeveni ;g classes while HC day classes attracted the higherpercentages of HC adult/continuing ed and vocational technicalstudents. (See Table 3.)
The percentages of all HC students enrolled in both HC day andevening classes remained about the same, with more than a fourthof the HC college credit students enrolled in both HC's day andevening classes.
Around 50% of HC college credit students attended both maincampus and HC, whereas the majority of HC adult/continuing ed andvocational/technical students attended Hunt Club exclusively.
- Hunt Club students generated more FTE in both terms at the HuntClub than at the main campus in all course types. See Table 4.
In both terms studied, at least 28% of the HC college creditstudents were full-time SCC students, and the majority were inthe "traditional" college age bracket of under 25.
- Adult & continuing education and vocational/technical courseswere taken primarily by students 40 and over. Tables 5 and 6show the nercentage distribution of HC students relative totheir total SCC enrollment and portion of HC FTE earned.
Two full years, 1989-90 and 1990-91, were studied for HC students'residence by zip code. However, because of city/countyoverlap of some zip codes, 22% of the HC students'city/county of residence could not be determined in both years.Consequently these students are presented as a separate category.A Central Florida Zip Codes map from the Central Florida PhoneBook, 1992, is provided for reference.
- The largest groups of HC students in all course types came fromSeminole County. See Table 7 and 8.
- In both years, in the college credit and college preparatorycourses (type 1), most students positively identified fromSeminole County were under age 25. From Orange and Lakecounties most HC college credit students were 25 or older.
- Over 50% of the HC student population from both Orange andSeminole counties in both terms were enrolled in college creditand college preparatory courses.
- Numbers of both HC adult & continuing education (type 3) andvocational/technical (type 4) students were overwhelmingly overage 25 from the major represented geographical areas.
- In the case of both Orange and Seminole counties the majority ofHC students came from the targeted 1..:.gh growth zip codessurrounding Hunt Club. See Tables 9 and 10.
SCC HUNT CLUB UNDUPLICATED ENROLLMENT BY RACE and SEX
fall Term, 1990 -91
(Ter 901)
Talple 1
NUMBERS
WITHIN COURSE TYPE'
College Credit and
Mon-Resident Alien
Asian-Pacific Islander
American Indian
Slack (Non-Hispanic)
Spanish
White (Mon - Hispanic)
Total Students
Male
female
Total
Mole
female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
female
Total
Male
female
Total
Mole
female
Total
Male
female
Total
College Prep
11
27
916
33
65
14
19
18
25
43
236
472
708
270
524
194
Adult/Continuing Ed
423
29
44
80
I1
18
f14
17
31
60
164
224
85
217
302
Vocational/Technical
01
10
44
00
01
56
1I
247
143
210
49
114
22)
UNDUPLICATED TOTAL
725
32
11
14
27
34
71
21
34
33
43
74
343
784
1129
404
901
1305
PERCENTAGES
WHIN COURSE TYPE:
College Credit and
College Prep
002
02
12
11
22
02
02
12
It
22
22
031
51
30%
598
892
342
662
1002
Adult/Continuing Ed
22
82
102
It
12
32
002
01
02
32
32
58
62
102
201
548
741
282
128
1002
Vocational/Technical
02
00%
02
021
02
002
01
22
32
02
0It
211
70
948
222
7112
1002
UNDUPLICATED TOTAL
It
21
21
12
I2
21
01
Ot
It
12
22
32
32
32
42
242
402
872
312
491
1001
UNDUPLICATED SCC
(EXCLUDING ANS)
21
It
011
It
22
08
01
01
32
52
71
32
42
72
382
422
001
481
522
1002
Source'
STD/NC/COUNT
Report Q, STO/COUNT Report
2.
Percentage totals may not agree due to rounding
ONOUPLICATED TOTAL counts a student only once even though s/he
may be in more than one course type
BE
ST
CO
PY
E71
1/12
111
I I
SCC AUNT CLUB UNDUPLICATED ENROLLMENT BY RACE and SEX
Fall Term, 119142
(Term 911)
Tab
le2
NUMBERS
VITNIN COURSE TYPE'
College Credit and
Non-Resident Alien
Asian - Pacific !slender
American Indian
Black (Non-Hispanic)
Spanish
Uhlte (Non-Hispanic)
Total St:dents
Male
Female
Total
Kole
Female
Total
Kale
female .
Total
hale
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Kale
Female
Total
College Prep
00
05
38
66
12
10
12
22
17
34
51
222
503
725
260
558
818
Adult/Continuing Ed
421
25
23
51
01
53
812
20
32
56
119
175
80
166
246
Vocational/Technical
0I
I0
33
00
00
44
29
11
66
190
256
41
207
215
UNDUPLICATED TOTAL
422
26
79
16
76
13
15
19
)4
31
6)
04
342
801
1143
406
920
1326
PERCENTAGES
WITHIN COURSE TYPE'
College Credit and
College Prep
00
02
02
12
02
It
12
12
It
It
II
32
22
42
62
272
612
892
322
682
1002
Adult/Continuing Ed
22
92
101
12
it
22
02
02
0%
22
It
32
52
82
132
232
482
712
3)0
671
1001
Vocotimil/lechnical
02
01
02
02
II
11
02
02
02
02
It
12
12
32
42
242
611
932
252
752
1001
UNDUPLICATED TOTAL
02
22
72
12
It
It
12
02
It
12
12
32
22
50
71
261
602
la
312
692
1002
UNOUPLICAIEO SCC
(EXCLUDING ANS)
It
II
22
12
II
22
01
01
02
31
42
72
31
42
7I
372
432
801
462
542
1002
Source'
STD/MC/COUNT
Report 2, STD/COUNT Report 2
Percentage totals may not agree due to rounding
UNDUPLICATE0 TOTAL
coun
ta student only once even though s/he may be In more than one course type
BE
ST C
OPY
Er:
3
COURSE TYPE
Table 3
5CC HUNT CLUB DAY /EVENING ENROLLMENT
UNDUPLICATED STUDENTS WHIN COURSE TYPE
FALL TERMS 1990-11 (901) and 1991-92
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage
Total
Enrolled
Enrolled
Enrolled
Number
In Day
In Evening
in Both
Classes
Classes
Day/Evening
Term
Term
Term
Term
Term
Term
Term
Term
901
911
901
911
901
'II
901
911
College Credit and
College Prep
302
242
442
492
262
272
194
818
Adult/Continuing Ed
592
682
412
302
12
22
302
146
Vocational/Technical
782
732
142
202
92
72
223
275
ALL COURSES
442
422
382
12
172
182
1319
1339
Totals say not agree due to rounding.
Source,
STO/HC/DAYEVE Reports
BE
ST
CO
PY
r"..
Course Type
(Teri 901)
SCC HUNT CLUB STUDENTS' COURSE LOAD
Fall Term, 1510-1,11 and 1991-1992
!Nisbet of HC Students
FTC Generated by
Percentage of Total
HUMBER
Hunt Club Students
SCC Students Attending Hunt Club
Table 4
Humber
Humber
Total
Part-Time FullTime
Attending
Attending
At
At
Part-Time
Full-Time
Total
P-T
F-T
Number
(All SCC)
(All SCC)
Hunt Club
Runt Club G
Hunt Club
Slain Carpus
(All 5CC)
(All SCC)
(All SCC)
all SCC
all SCC all SCC
Eleinninely
Main COOVUS
College Credit and
College Fr-:
566
228
382
412
82.84
63.89
130
91
118
4485
2469
6954
Adult/Contir
295
7276
26
27.87
2.83
80
42
80
3808
174
3982
Yocatiof:1/
223
0194
29
5.96
0.51
50
01
48
4484
559
5043
TOTAL
1084
235
852
467
116.67
67.23
88
78
88
12777
3202
15919
,111
College Credit and
College Prep
589
229
414
404
84.75
62.80
129
91
119
5051
2636
1681
Adult/Continuing Ed
244
2278
18
25.43
15.45
6%
IX
68
3881
180
4061
Vocational /Technical
215
0204
66
6.16
1.39
11
08
dt
4174
521
4497
TOTAL
1108
231
851
488
116.34
71.64
110
78
HZ
13108
3337
16445
Sources STD/NC/SCHEDULES, STUNC/SSHCAIMT
Totals say not agree due to rounding
Ftr,
;::r:
4FJ
41
SCE NUM CCU ACE OROUP/FTE OiSTRIBUTION BY COURSE TYPE
Fall Ter., 1990-1991
Tem 901
Course Type/Age Range
Part-Time Enrollees at 5CC
Full -Tine Enrollees at SCC
HC FTC
Feoale
22
Male
MC FIE
Emile
MC FTC
PIT
PIT
Male
21
11
Students
HC FTE
I
i Total
I Total
College Cr.
iii College Prep
To-24
91
91
131
132
222
222
132
25-39
102
82
231
192
332
272
li
40 and Over
12
12
162
121
172
131
01
Total
202
172
512
451
712
632
141
Adult & Continuing Education
To-24
101
192
92
122
192
312
12
25-39
62
52
231
262
281
312
01
40 and Over
172
72
382
241
502
312
02
Total
272
312
702
622
972
932
12
Vocational/Technical
To-24
02
02
22
II
22
11
02
25-39
102
102
302
312
402
472
08
40 and Over
121
92
462
482
582
572
02
Total
222
192
782
811
1001
1001
02
Source'
STD/NC/SWOON% STO/DA1LYFTE
Percentage totals may not agree due to rounding
BE
ST C
OPY
Et,7
ZS:
T.E
Table 5
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
NUMBER
HC
HC FTC
HC FTC
F/T
f/T
STUDENTS
FTC I
NUMER
2 Students
HC FTC
%Total
%Total
162
122
172
252
3)2
373
22
22
22
31
42
281
02
12
I%
12
12
140
182
152
192
791
372
794
12
02
II
12
21
59
Ot
12
32
I%
32
89
It
02
11
12
22
154
22
21
52
32
72
302
02
02
02
02
02
4
02
02
01
02
02
89
02
01
01
02
02
130
02
at
ot
ot
ot
223
551
311
142
1002
87.84
332
341
332
1001
27.87
II
422
572
1001
5.96
SCC HUNT CLUS AGE GROUP/FTE TAKEN DISTRIBUTION BY COURSE TYPE
Fall Term, 1991-1992
Term 911
Table 4
Course Type/Age Range
Part-Time Enrollees at SCC
Full-Time Enrollees at SCE
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
NUMBER
HC
HC FTC
Male
HC FTE
Female
NC FTE
P/T
PIT
Male
11C FTC
resale
HC FTC
FIT
F/1
STUDENTS
FTE %
NUMBER
22
I2
Students
NC FTC
22
22 Students
HC FTC
2 Total
2 Total
I Total
2 Total
College Cr.
1, College Prep
To-24
102
92
161
162
262
252
101
132
142
182
242
312
404
562
25-39
82
72
222
192
291
262
22
22
22
22
32
31
261
291
40 and Over
32
22
142
122
172
142
02
02
11
12
12
11
141
152
Total
202
III
52Z
472
722
042
122
142
162
212
282
362
818
1001
84.75
Adult T. Continuing Education
To -24
112
152
Iii
III
222
261
02
02
01
01
02
01
53
262
25-39
112
142
212
222
332
362
02
01
OX
01
01
01
80
362
40 and Ouer
91
101
352
251
452
552
12
22
02
12
11
31
113
382
Total
121
192
672
502
992
972
It
22
Ot
12
12
32
246
1002
25.43
Vocational/Technical
Im.24
OR
2%
42
41
42
51
Ot
Ot
OR
Ot
Ot
02
12
52
25.39
101
92
292
291
401
381
01
02
01
01
Ot
02
109
381
40 and Over
142
112
422
462
562
562
01
02
00
02
02
02
154
561
Total
251
211
752
792
1002
1000
02
02
02
02
02
02
275
1002
4.16
Source,
STO/HC/SSHCOUNT, STO/DAILYFTE
Percentage totals may not agree due to rounding
BE
ST 1
:011
'Y
CENTRAL FLORIDA ZIP CODES
t""'RES CV
SUMMARY BY YEAR OF HC STUDENTS' RESIDENCE BY ZIP CODE
YEAR 1989-90 (893,894,901,9(2)
COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
OSCEOLA COUNTY
SEMINOLE COUNTY
VOLUSIA COUNTY
UNIDENT1FED COUNTY(NOT CLEARLY DEFINED)
GRAND TOTAL BYCOURSE TYPE:
COURSE TYPE
TOTAL LAKE COUNTY
TOTAL ORANGE COUNTY
TOTAL OSCEOLA COUNTY
TOTAL SEMINOLE COUNTY.
TOTAL VOLUSIA COUNTY
TOTAL ONIDENTIFP.
GRAND TOTAL FOR 1989-90
Course Type:1= Coil QeCrecitaidCoiIe9e Prep3= M itonflnung Eduattion4= Vocationalifechrical
Source: STD)NC/COUNT Report 4
1
34
1
34
1
34
1
34
1
34
1
34
TABLE 7
AGE 15- 24M F TOTAL
ACE 25- 39M F TOTAL
AGE 40 &OVEFIM F TOTAL
GRANDTOTAL!
2 1 3 3 7 10 2 5 7 200 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 20 1 1 1 3 4 3 2 5 10
2 2 4412 16 5 7 12 32
40 61 101 37 81 118 6 37 43 2628 13 21 7 26 33 11 23 34 883 6 9 19 47 66 19 55 74 149
51 80 131 63 154 217 36 115 151 499
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
0.0 0.0 0 0 0 3 3 3
270 314 584 91 214 305 22 159 181 107035 41 76 27 80 107 47 139 186 3694 13 17 47 112 159 66 199 265 441
: 309 368 ... _677 165 406 571 135 497 632 1880
0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1
.0 1 13 1 I 1 2 0 . 1 t 4
64 99 163 62 93 155 12 48 60 37829 16 45 13 37 50 20 50 70 1652 6 8 17 53 70 24 60 84 162
96 1 ... 2i6:i.::27S6i58. 214: 705
376 476 852 193 396 589 42 249 291 173272 70 142 47 145 192 78 215 293 6279 26 35 85 215 300 112 317 429 764
457 572 1029 325 756 1081 232 781 1013 3123
4 6
SUMMARY BY YEAR OF HC STUDENTS' RESIDENCE BY ZIP CODE
YEAR 1990-1991 (903,944,911,912)
COUNTY
LAKE COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
OSCEOLA COUNTY
SEMINOLE COUNTY
VOLUSIA COUNTY
UNIDENT1FED COUNTY(NOT CLEARLY DEFINED)
GRAND TOTAL BYCOURSE TYPE:
COURSE TYPE
34
TOTAL LAKE COUNTY
TOTAL ORANGE COUNTY
TOTAL OSCEOLA COUNTY
TOTAL SEMINOLE. COUNTY: Bill....
poTALvowsLoNcpulfiy.:-
34
1
34
1
34
1
1
3
TABLE 8
AGE 15- 24M F TOTAL
AGE 25- 39M F TOTAL
AGE 40 &OVERGIVNITM F TOTAL TOTAL
1 5 6 3 7 10 0 3 3 191 1 2 0 3 3 1 1 2 70 0 0 0 5 5 0 4 4 9
2 6 8 3 15 18 1 8 9 35
35 51 86 35 77 112 8 28 36 23414 10 24 11 18 29 10 27 37 89
1 9 10 13 50 63 9 32 41 114
50 70 120 59 145 204 27 87 114 437
1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:: 0 1; 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
271 352 623 105 207 312 38 163 201 113656 67 123 69 85 154 57 139 196 473
5 15 20 33 105 138 69 202 271 429
332', 4,14 ;.::: 7es: 207 397 604 164.504 668 2038
0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1
0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 I 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 >':3 8; : I 0 1 0 0 0 4
84 121 205 44 105 149 10 38 46 4001 16 27 43 28 30 58 22 37 59 160
1 10 11 11 30 41 30 60 90 142
101::1 ':::: 259; 83 :158.Ii::::::::: 248 62 133 :.: 195! 702:
392 529 921 1: 396 584 56 230 286 1791I 87 107 194 108 136 244 90 204 294 731t 7 35 42 57 190 247 108 298 406 e95
486 671 1157 353 722 1075 254 732 986 3217
TOTALINDENTIFEDCOUNIT
GRAND TOTAL FOR 1990-91
Course Type:1= Ca Credtand Wive Prep3= 'ruing Eciucabon4= Vocational/Tectrical
Source: STD/HC/COUNT Report 4
4 't
00
111111111111111 11111111111111111151 ' 11
111111111111111 11111111111111111111
111 .111
1 III
111111iiiM §
Ill
IIII,111111 1
J. J. J. J. J.
111111111111111 m1111111111111111111 1 1
46 (0 -A 46 Ca -A A (0 -6 44 (4 4 44 4 44 4. 4. (4 -6 4. W- 44 (4 -A 44 (0 44 C4 A .44 0
W
§
008h)080b1808088
... _, ., 0 co ti
CA 8 i h) h) 8 ft, 8 ER
_.
.. -. 1
n) CA t CA 8
i
N) CA t h) 8 8
E..
8
-. ii
8
8
R
000
000
o c) o c>
c) -. _. 0 -. CA CD CD C) 4 ..4 ..4 ...4 44 8
000c).-000.-.0o).N8
o -. -. 0 ro =2
o c> -. o) -. CO N) : 8
A
mg g
11
I
A Cl 4'
P
g6)
g Q)
9 g
CD CA 44 -4 *4 CA A. 0; 8 A
:: 8 co t3
CAN CA CA CA 8 8 8 SR 8 zt ;i: t3 iJ
g CON:1-NI*48521PI88Mg
SR
52
N)
4A4
t
8
A -74
000
- ON
"ONO
-. 0 4 A A CO - C) h) -4 C) -A CO CO 8
...4 -4 ......... .4 co 4 4 -4 0 0 6 40 4) CA h) N) C) 44 -4
-4-41.080
);
3:
2
tg
11
8 8
.3,2
F
iiii
g
g g
A CO -. ix A h) co co CA *4 44 (0 SI
CA
i CO a ) 8 C A D 8 S3 2 : SR Al 888 t 8
g CA *4 P3 8 8 SS V (1 .71 ;8 8 SS 8
8
(2i
8
il
o -. C)
CD C D -A
0 -. -. 0
0000-AN000040000W
........m 0 A 0 0 3 - a -A
co . . ,4 4 Cl) A CD N) 8 co K) 8 8 .I?
PI
X 719:'8
2
14
ti 4
* ? T 8 8 § .93 ii
-. -- co co -. co 4. ;8 61 !!
co I.) co 8 co co it t
1 ::
NU
MB
ER
OF
SR
/DE
NT
S IN
TA
RG
ET
CE
NS
US
TR
AC
KY
EA
R 1
90S
-90
ones
cacn
,ac
ZIP
AR
EA
CO
UN
TY
TY
PE
3275
1E
AS
TO
N/1
.LE
& M
AIT
LAN
D"
OR
AN
GE
/SE
MIN
OLE
1
3275
1E
AS
TO
NV
ILLE
& M
AIT
LAN
D*
OR
AN
GE
/SF
_MIN
OLE
332
751
EA
ST
ON
VLL
E &
MA
ITLA
ND
*OR
AN
GE
/SE
MIN
OLE
432
703
AP
OP
KA
OR
AN
GE
/SE
MIN
OLE
1
3270
3A
PO
PK
A*
OR
AN
GE
/SE
MIN
OLE
332
703
AP
OP
KA
OR
AN
GE
/SE
MIN
OLE
4
TA
RG
Eitt
fiSE
MilL
iOLE
CO
UM
VIW
OR
AN
GO
OO
NT
V/P
.CO
DE
S
TO
TA
L S
EM
INO
LE C
OU
NIY
1M71
-1 O
RA
NG
E C
OU
NT
Y Z
IP C
OD
ES
Cou
rse
Typ
e:1
Col
lege
Cre
dit a
nd C
olle
ge P
rep
3 A
dult/
Con
tinui
ng E
duos
tion
Voo
dion
elfr
edvd
cal
Sou
roe:
ST
D/H
C/C
OU
NT
Rep
ort 4
5 i)
AG
E 1
515
MF
24
TO
TA
L
AG
EM
25F
39
TO
TA
L
AG
E40
& O
VE
RM
F
TO
TA
LOT
AL
3RA
ND
77
142
13
02
219
10
13
25
310
1319
00
02
13
08
811
3961
100
3970
109
933
4225
123
1235
724
3111
2839
105
o6
67
2431
1537
5289
70-
8615
660
122
182
3811
815
649
4
360
448
808
228
560
788
171
612
783
2379
BE
ST C
O A
UE
ZIE
TA
BLE
9P
epe
2
0
1--
0
8qu7°--- ,t:-..,
,72.22§4q4488ARM2,
1.....
Q
W0<
1-O1
0 N N0(001-100,000.-N0.D0J00.4-(00c0,1-4-N 00,
Or0,--NOr-ONMOON- 000
8
8
0
,o.
CO
031,-)28,78f-.140,00
in428,0.imu,CIOVOMFic77WNNO't0
Wg3
LkNMW0<
I-0/-
.-o-NNN()WWNg3 8 0-0
rONW.--Nv-MOVDWr .-...--0
0.--0,-,ONW.:1-0 000
S
4
zigp-c:),38mq r..-01.00.t(0.-- ,--
W 8Wctp8RONcicomcf-N000(000.4.
U .
v-NWMw
4F'-
F-
.4,0,0-01.00sm,IN0000
cv.--0(.1000-0 wtm, 000
N000.,--0,-NOW0T-r- 000
%
4
2
8 wovoir14(08,0-07,..,
0 8(0-08,0,-."
8 (000,2FiNg3004000
CQ
4
NU
MB
ER
OF
ST
UD
EN
TS
IN T
AR
GE
T C
EN
SU
S T
RA
CK
YE
AR
199
0-19
91 (
903,
904,
911,
912)
ZIP
AR
EA
CO
UN
TY
TY
PE
3275
1E
AST
OW
IUE
& W
itTL
AN
D*
OR
AN
GE
/SE
MIN
OLE
1
3275
1E
AS
TO
NV
LLE
& M
AM
AN
D*
OR
AN
GE
/SE
MIN
OLE
332
751
EA
ST
ON
ILLE
& M
AM
AN
D*
OR
AN
GE
/SE
MIN
OLE
432
703
AP
OP
KA
* O
RA
NG
E/S
EM
INO
LE1
3270
3A
PO
PK
A*
OR
AN
GE
/SE
MIN
OLE
332
703
AP
OP
KA
* O
RA
NG
E/S
EM
INO
LE4
AG
E 1
5-24
MF
TO
TA
L
AG
E 2
5- 3
9M
FT
OT
AL
-ME
W)
&
OV
EFF
-j-G
AA
N61
MF
TO
TT
OT
AL
38
115
510
10
122
11
21
23
25
712
01
10
00
57
1213
5583
138
2073
934
2529
260
1019
2915
2540
1324
3710
61
56
316
199
1827
52
TA
BL
E 1
0Pa
ge 2
TA
RG
ET
ED
SE
MIN
OLE
CO
UN
TY
WIT
H O
RA
NG
E C
OU
NT
Y Z
IP C
OD
ES
TO
TA
L70
117
187
4412
116
534
7911
346
51
TO
TA
L S
EM
INO
LE C
OU
NT
Y W
ITH
OR
AN
GE
CO
UN
TY
ZIP
CO
DE
S38
250
488
626
654
280
819
159
178
224
75
Cou
rse
Typ
e:1=
Col
lege
Cre
dt a
nd C
olle
ge P
rep
3= A
dult
atra
ing
Edu
catio
n4=
Voc
atio
neirf
ectn
ical
Sou
rce:
SM
/HC
/CO
UN
T R
epor
t4