1

ECS455 Chapter 2 Cellular Systems

2.2 Co-Channel Interference

Dr.Prapun Suksompongprapun.com/ecs455 -1-0.500.51

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

10

15

20

25

30

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Co-Channel Interference

2

Frequency reuse co-channel interference 

D

BC

AD 

B C

A

D

BC

AD

BC

A

D 

B C

A

D

BC

AD

BC

A

Consider only nearby interferers.

Power decreases rapidly as the distance increases.

In a fully equipped hexagonal-shaped cellular system, there are always K = 6 cochannel interfering cells in the first tier.

(Intercell)

Three Measures of Signal Quality

3

For noise-limited systems,

Consider both noise & interference:

The best cellular system design places users that share the same channel at a separation distance (as close as possible) where the intercell interference is just below the maximum tolerable level for the required data rate and BER.

Good cellular system designs are interference-limited, meaning that the interference power is much larger than the noise power.

noise

SNR rPP

interference

SIR rPP

interference noise

SINR rPP P

Signal-to-noise (power) ratio

Signal-to-interference-plus-noise (power) ratio

Signal-to-interference (power) ratio

“Reliable” vs. “tolerable”?

4

Subjective tests found that people regard an FM signal using a 30 kHz channel bandwidth to be clear if the signal power is at least sixty times higher than the noise/interference power.

1010log 60 17.78 18 dB

We will soon revisit and use these numbers for some more specific calculations

Co-channel cells, must be spaced far enough apart so that interference between users in co-channel cells does not degrade signal quality below tolerable levels.

[Klemens, 2010, p 54]

(Why not as far as possible?)

Review: Simplified Path Loss Model

5

is a unitless constant which depends on the antenna characteristics and the average channel attenuation

d0 is a reference distance for the antenna far-field Typically 1-10 m indoors and 10-100 m

outdoors.

γ is the path loss exponent. 2 in free-space model 4 in two-ray model [Goldsmith, 2005, eq.

2.17]

0r

t

dPP d

Capture the essence of signal propagation without resorting to complicated path loss models, which are only approximations to the real channel anyway!

[Goldsmith, 2005, Table 2.2]

0 1tr

P d kPd d d

SIR (S/I): Definition/Calculation

6

K = # co-channel interfering cells

The signal-to-interference ratio (S/I or SIR) for a mobile receiver which monitors a forward channel can be expressed as

Pr = the desired signal power from the desired base station

Pi = the interference power caused by the ith interfering co-channel cell base station.

Often called the carrier-to-interference ratio: CIR.Cau

tion:

Not

the

sam

e as

the

K u

sed

in S

ectio

n 1.

3

interferenceof the interferer

1

SIRth

ii

Kr rP P

P P

[Rappaport, 2002]

SIR: N = 3

7

Hexagon

8

R

R

R

R

R

2R

R

2R

3R

32R

32

R

32

R

3R

2 21 3 1 3 3Area 6 2 2.5982 2 2 2

R R R R

SIR: N = 3

9

Consider only cells in first tier.

Worse-case distance 

2R

 

32R 

D1 

D2  D3 

D4 

D5 D6 

2R 

4R 13R  

13R   7R  

7R  

1 1SIR1

1

2 7 2 13 2 4

i i ii

i i

k Rk D D D

R R

If N = 19, will the SIR be better or worse?

(Ignore co-channel cells that are too far away)

-3-2-10123

-4

-2

0

2

4

0

10

20

30

40

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

SIR: N = 3

10

Centers of cochannel cells when N = 3

SIR: N = 3

Observe that the SIR value is smallest when MS is at any of the corners of the hexagonal cell. At such locations, d = R (the cell radius).

1 1SIR1i i i

ii i

k dk D D D

d d

d = distance between MS and BS

-6-4-20246

-10

-5

0

5

10

0

10

20

30

40

50

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

SIR: N = 3 vs. N = 7

11

Centers of cochannel cells when N = 7

Centers of cochannel cells when N = 3

SIR: N = 3

SIR: N = 7

-1-0.500.51

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

10

15

20

25

30

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

SIR: N = 3

SIR: N = 7

Approximation

12

Consider only first tier.

Worse-case distance

Use the same D for Di

1SIRi

i

DR

Approximation

13

Consider only first tier.

Worse-case distance

Use the same D for Di

1IR 11S

i

DKR

DKD

RR

Notice that D/R is an important quantity!

1SIRi

i

DR

Center-to-center distance (D)

14

 

D 

3j R  3i R  

120 

2 2

2 2

3 3 2 3 3 cos 120

3 3

D i R j R i R j R

R i j ij R N

This distance, D, is called reuse distance.

Co-channel reuse ratio

3 .DQ NR

A B

2 2 2 12 cos ; cos 1202

D A AB B

Q and N

15

Co-channel reuse ratio

3 .DQ NR

Approximation: Crude formula

16

As the cell cluster size (N) increases, the spacing (D) between interfering cells increases, reducing the interference.

interferenceof the interfer r

1e

SIR

11 1

1 3

th

Kr r

i

i

i

i

P PP P

D DKR

RR

DK

NK

Summary: Quantity vs. Quality

17

total

cell

A SCA N

S = total # available duplex radio channels for the system

Frequency reuse with cluster size N

Tradeoff

m = # channels allocated to each cell.

“Capacity”

Path loss exponent

1SIR 3NK

SIR: N = 7

18

Better approximation…

SIR2 2 2

12 1 2 1 2

RD R D R D

Q Q Q

Again, 3 .DQ NR

Comparison

19

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 208

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

N

SIR

[dB

]

Di

DD+-1

6

1

1SIR6

1SIR

1S

2 1 1 2

IR

2

i

i

Q

Q

R

Q

D

Q

DQR

SIR Threshold

20

The SIR should be greater than a specified threshold for proper signal operation.

In the 1G AMPS system, designed for voice calls, the threshold for acceptable voice quality is SIR equal to 18 dB.

For the 2G digital AMPS system (D-AMPS or IS-54/136), a threshold of 14 dB is deemed suitable.

For the GSM system, a range of 7–12 dB, depending on the study done, is suggested as the appropriate threshold.

The probability of error in a digital system depends on the choice of this threshold as well.

[Sch

war

tz, 2

005,

p 6

4]