economic theory: growth of firms

6
1 6. The Growth of Firms 4/28/2011 1 Raffles Institution Raffles Institution Methods of Comparing Size of Firms Motives for Growth Methods of Growth Optimum Size of Firms Existence of Small Firms 4/28/2011 2 6 The Growth of Firms Flow Measures Quantity of Output (theoretical) Sales Turnover (‘Total Revenue’) Stock Measures Capital Stock Number of Employees 4/28/2011 Raffles Institution 3 6.1 Measurement of Size of Firms Other Measures Concentration Ratio Comparing SingTel and StarHub Measure Sales Turnover 16.8 billion (SGD) 2.15 billion (SGD) Concentration Ratio (mobile phone market only) 0.457 0.30 Capital Stock* 37.9 billion (SGD) 1.73 billion (SGD) Number of employees 4000 2702 2010 figures *Estimated 4/28/2011 Raffles Institution 4 Comparing Apple and Microsoft Measure Sales Turnover 65.2 billion (USD) 62.5 billion (USD) Capital Stock* 75.2 billion (USD) 86.1 billion (USD) Number of employees 49,400 89,000 2010 figures *Estimated 4/28/2011 Raffles Institution 5 Raffles Institution Motives for growth Exploit economies of scale more fully (reduce cost) Market domination (increase price) Reduce risk 4/28/2011 6 6.2 Motives for growth

Upload: weichen-christopher-xu

Post on 10-Dec-2015

228 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

H2 EconomicsThe Growth of Firms and Market Structures

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Economic Theory: Growth of Firms

1

6. The Growth of Firms

4/28/2011 1Raffles Institution Raffles Institution

Methods of Comparing Size of Firms

Motives for Growth

Methods of Growth

Optimum Size of Firms

Existence of Small Firms

4/28/2011 2

6 The Growth of Firms

Flow Measures

� Quantity of Output (theoretical)

� Sales Turnover(‘Total Revenue’)

Stock Measures

� Capital Stock

� Number of Employees

4/28/2011 Raffles Institution 3

6.1 Measurement of Size of Firms

Other Measures

� Concentration Ratio

Comparing SingTel and StarHub

Measure

Sales Turnover 16.8 billion (SGD) 2.15 billion (SGD)

Concentration Ratio(mobile phone market only)

0.457 0.30

Capital Stock* 37.9 billion (SGD) 1.73 billion (SGD)

Number of employees 4000 2702

2010 figures*Estimated

4/28/2011 Raffles Institution 4

Comparing Apple and Microsoft

Measure

Sales Turnover 65.2 billion (USD) 62.5 billion (USD)

Capital Stock* 75.2 billion (USD) 86.1 billion (USD)

Number of employees 49,400 89,000

2010 figures*Estimated

4/28/2011 Raffles Institution 5 Raffles Institution

Motives for growth

Exploit economies of scale

more fully(reduce cost)

Market domination

(increase price)

Reduce risk

4/28/2011 6

6.2 Motives for growth

Page 2: Economic Theory: Growth of Firms

2

Exploit (Internal) Economies of

Scale� Assume flour is the only ingredient in bread

and no fixed cost

� 80 � 10 � $3x10=$30 � ATC = $0.375

� 8000 �1000�$2x1000=$2000�ATC=$0.25

� [bulk-buying]

4/28/2011 Raffles Institution 7

Market Dominance

� Increase market share

� Increase market power

� Increase price

4/28/2011 Raffles Institution 8

Reduce Risk

� Diversification reduces market risk

� Market risk includes risk of market demand falling

� Increased market valuation reduce risk of take-over

� Market Valuation = Share Price x No. of shares

� Take-over = Change of ownership where another firm buys up the target firm’s shares and becomes the majority shareholder

� High share price = High market valuation = More difficult to be taken over

4/28/2011 Raffles Institution 9 Raffles Institution

Methods of growth

Internal Growth External Growth

Merger

1. Horizontal integration2. Vertical integration

- Forward

- Backward3. Conglomeration

Take-over/ Acquisition

4/28/2011 10

6.2

Internal Growth

� Build up productive capacity

� Build a bigger plant (or more plants)

4/28/2011 Raffles Institution 11

External GrowthTake-over/ Acquisition

� One firm buying another firm

Merger

� Two firms forming one entity

“Formed in 2000, when Chase Manhattan Corporation merged with J.P. Morgan & Co.”

4/28/2011 Raffles Institution 12

Page 3: Economic Theory: Growth of Firms

3

External Growth: M&A

Vertical IntegrationBackward

� Firms extend into previous stage of production

4/28/2011 Raffles Institution 13

VIMALA RELIANCE PRODUCT

External Growth: M&A

Vertical IntegrationForward

� Firms moves into succeeding stage of production

=news ‘producer’

=news distributor

4/28/2011 Raffles Institution 14

External Growth: M&A

Horizontal Integration� Firm takes

over/merges with another firm at the same stage of production

� E.g.Daimler-Benz + Chrysler = DaimlerChrysler [1998]

4/28/2011 Raffles Institution 15

External Growth: M&A

Conglomeration� Neither vertical nor

horizontal

� Combination of firms not directly related

� E.g.Google bought over YouTube (2006)

4/28/2011 Raffles Institution 16

Raffles Institution4/28/2011 17

� It all depends on the amount of IEOS available relative to market demand

6.4 The Optimum Size of the Firm

10.18

The minimum efficient scale and market

demand� The minimum efficient scale (mes) is the output at

which a firm’s long-run average cost curve stops falling.

� The size of the mes relative to market demand has a strong influence on market structure

DLAC1

LAC2

LAC3

Output

£

Page 4: Economic Theory: Growth of Firms

4

10.19

The minimum efficient scale and market

demand� The minimum efficient scale (mes) is the output at

which a firm’s long-run average cost curve stops falling.

� The size of the mes relative to market demand has a strong influence on market structure

DLAC1

LAC2

LAC3

Output

£

q2 q3 Q1q1

P1=C1

Q2

10.20

The minimum efficient scale and market

demand� If market demand is Q1 = 1000

� The firm’s LRAC is LAC1 and its MES is q1=10,

� Then there will be 100 firms in the industry that achieves MES???

� Many firms relative to market demand

DLAC1

LAC2

LAC3

Output

£

Q1=1000q1=10

P1=C1

10.21

The minimum efficient scale and market

demand� If market demand is Q2 = 700

� The firm’s LRAC is LAC3 and its MES is q3=800,

� Then the industry can support 1 firm ??

DLAC1

LAC2

LAC3

Output

£

q3=800Q2=700

10.22

The minimum efficient scale and market

demand

DLAC1

LAC2

LAC3

Output

£

Q2=350 Q2=700

� If market demand is Q2 = 700

� The firm’s LRAC is LAC2 and its MES is q2=350,

� Then the industry will achieve 2 firms MES???

� A few large firms relative to industry’s demand

10.23

The minimum efficient scale and market

demand� The minimum efficient scale (mes) is the output at

which a firm’s long-run average cost curve stops falling.

� The size of the mes relative to market demand has a strong influence on market structure

DLAC1

LAC2

LAC3

Output

£

q2 q3 Q1q1

P1=C1

Q2

10.24

The minimum efficient scale and market

demand� The minimum efficient scale (mes) is the output at

which a firm’s long-run average cost curve stops falling.

� The size of the mes relative to market demand has a strong influence on market structure

DLAC1

LAC2

LAC3

Output

£

q2 q3 Q1q1

P1=C1

Q2

Page 5: Economic Theory: Growth of Firms

5

4/28/2011 Raffles Institution 25

6.5 Existence of Small Firms

Demand Side

Supply Side

Factors

00:00:06

4/28/2011 Raffles Institution 26

Supply side factors

1) Internal diseconomies of scale

D

LAC

Output

£

Q

E.g. Hair dressing, dental clinic

00:00:30

4/28/2011 Raffles Institution 27

Supply side factors

2) Banding

• Group of firms band together to gain the advantages of bulk buying

• Examples: Market cooperatives such as iEcon

00:01:17

4/28/2011 Raffles Institution 28

Supply side factors

3) Vertical disintegration

• Small firms emerge when an entire production process is broken into a series of separate processes• Examples: Hollywood firms

• Studios used to handle everything from production to theatrical presentation• Now, with lighting companies, post-production companies, props and editing industries, etc.

00:01:19

4/28/2011 Raffles Institution 29

Supply side factors

4) Low barriers to entry Costs ($)

Quantity0

LRAC1

Examples: Foot wear, accessories stores

LRAC2

Q1 Q2Q3

00:02:38

4/28/2011 Raffles Institution 30

Supply side factors

5) Managerial Attitudes

• Risk-averse• Desire to keep firms under family control• Example:

• Lim Chee Guan prior to 2009

00:03:05

Page 6: Economic Theory: Growth of Firms

6

4/28/2011 Raffles Institution 31

Demand side factors

1) Nature of the product

• BULKY, eg. Bricks & fresh fish

• Perishable eg. Grocery/fruit stalls

00:03:20

4/28/2011 Raffles Institution 32

Demand side factors

1) Nature of the product

• Demand for Variety, e.g. Rolex watches, Mont Blanc Pen

• Personalised services, e.g. custom-made to order furniture/clothes• Specialised products, e.g. lab equipment• Prestige markets, e.g. Vertu,

00:00:09

4/28/2011 Raffles Institution 33

Demand side factors2) Niche markets

• A subset of the market which a firm carves out for itself• Examples:

• Educational travel industry/eco-tourism• Organic food products• Gaming mouse

00:00:24

4/28/2011 Raffles Institution 34

Demand side factors

3) Geographical limitations

• Bulky products where transport costs will be high relative to total production costs.• Examples:

• Supermarkets operating in Russia• Not feasible for them to cater to the whole market due to poor transport infrastructure

00:00:36

Raffles Institution

6.5 Existence of Small Firms

Demand SideSupply Side1. Nature of the product

• Bulky, perishable

• Demand for variety

• Personal services

• Specialised products

• Prestige markets

2. Niche markets

3. Geographical limitations

1. Internal economies of scale limited relative to market demand

2. Banding

3. Vertical disintegration

4. Barriers to entry low

5. Managerial attitudes

4/28/2011 35

00:00:52

Raffles Institution

� How do small firms survive?

� Why do small firms exist?

� Why do firms choose to remain small?

� What are the factors that encourage the existence of small firms?

� Why do firms merge?

4/28/2011 36

Food for thought:

00:00:53