ecohydrology of root zone water fluxes and soil development in complex semiarid rangelands

Download Ecohydrology of root zone water fluxes and soil development in complex semiarid rangelands

Post on 11-Jun-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents

1 download

Embed Size (px)

TRANSCRIPT

  • HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSESHydrol. Process. 20, 32893316 (2006)Published online in Wiley InterScience(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6333

    Ecohydrology of root zone water fluxes and soildevelopment in complex semiarid rangelands

    Hugo A. Gutierrez-Jurado, Enrique R. Vivoni,* J. Bruce J. Harrison and Huade GuanDepartment of Earth and Environmental Science, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, New Mexico, 87801, USA

    Abstract:In semiarid complex terrain, the landscape creates spatial niches for different types of vegetation through the effectsof aspect, slope and curvature on the water and energy balance at the soil surface. The ecohydrology of rangelandsis defined by the interaction of soils, plants and climate occurring on a topographic surface. While these interactionshave been studied for subtle terrain, little is known about the controls exerted by terrain position, in particular terrainaspect, on ecosystem processes. Furthermore, differential plant establishment can lead to measurable differences inrates of soil development, which in turn can affect soil hydraulic properties and the surface water balance. In thisstudy, we outline the physical mechanisms affecting plant establishment, soil development and hydrologic fluxes insemiarid complex terrain. We illustrate the interactions between vegetation, root zone water fluxes and soil developmentusing, as an example, a small drainage basin in the Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge (SNWR), New Mexico. In thestudy basin, opposing hillslopes are characterized by marked differences in ecosystem composition and soil profileproperties, with the north-facing hillslope dominated by one seed juniper (Juniperus monosperma) and the south-facingslope consisting of creosote bush (Larrea tridentata). We assess the effect of terrain aspect on root zone hydrologicfluxes and soil development in the two ecosystems by using soil observations, hydraulic properties from pedotransferfunctions (PTFs), and numerical modelling of vadose zone fluxes. Modelling results show marked differences inroot zone fluxes in the north-facing juniper and south-facing creosote ecosystems. Differences in the amplitude andfrequency of soil water content and pressure correspond to changes in soil profile and vegetation characteristics. Forexample, soil properties of the calcium carbonate (CaCO3) horizons and differential plant water uptake impact thesimulated soil water pressure over an 8-year period in the opposing ecosystems. It is believed that these variations inwater fluxes reinforce the development of CaCO3 horizons present in the soil profiles, leading to a feedback betweenvegetation establishment, soil water fluxes and geomorphic processes in the catchment. Our results also indicate thatsoil properties and water fluxes compensate for large differences in evaporative demand and lead to similar actualevapotranspiration (AET) in the opposing slopes. Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.KEY WORDS biome transition; plantwater interactions; semiarid hydrology; pedogenesis; calcic soils; vadose zone

    modelling; evapotranspiration; New Mexico

    Received 30 April 2005; Accepted 4 October 2005

    INTRODUCTION

    Topographic and soil properties are considered to largely determine the spatial establishment and persistenceof terrestrial plants under a similar climate (e.g. Wierenga et al., 1987; Florinsky and Kuryakova, 1996; Engelet al., 2002; Coblentz and Riiters, 2004; Kim and Eltahir, 2004; Caylor et al., 2005). In arid and semiaridenvironments, low precipitation amounts lead to conditions where water availability and its interaction withterrain and soil characteristics control ecosystem processes such as transpiration, growth, species competition,and mortality (e.g. Allen and Breshears, 1998; Wainwright et al., 1999; Rodrguez-Iturbe et al., 2001a;Porporato et al., 2002; Wilcox et al., 2003a; Kerkhoff et al., 2004). As a result, the study of semiarid

    * Correspondence to: Enrique R. Vivoni, Department of Earth and Environmental Science, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology,801 Leroy Place, MSEC 244, Socorro, NM 87801, USA. E-mail: vivoni@nmt.edu

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

  • 3290 H. A. GUTI ERREZ-JURADO ET AL.

    watersheds characterized by complex terrain requires consideration of the combined effect of topography,soils and vegetation on the redistribution of available water (Loik et al., 2004; Reynolds et al., 2004; Ludwiget al., 2005; Newman et al., 2006). Despite their importance, interactions and feedbacks between terrainposition, soil properties and plant establishment have not been adequately documented in arid and semiaridregions, in particular with respect to the reinforcing effects of these interactions on soil development. Terrain-soil-plant interactions in water-limited ecosystems is an emerging research issue in ecohydrology, whichpresents a significant opportunity to understand both the short term (e.g. runoff response, seasonal growth)and long-term processes (e.g. soil evolution, plant succession) operating within watersheds.

    Topographic position is known to create spatial niches for the establishment of specific vegetation types (e.g.grasses, shrubs, trees) through the effects of slope, aspect and curvature on incident radiation and the transportof water and nutrients (Band et al., 1993; Moore et al., 1993; Mackay and Band, 1997; Dirnbock et al., 2002).For example, the effects of topography on soil water redistribution have been widely recognized to createregions of time-varying saturation near channels (Dunne and Black, 1970; Beven and Kirkby, 1979; Westernet al., 1999). Differences in lateral moisture distribution also lead to soil catenary relationships along hillslopesand transport of material downslope toward channel reaches (Milne, 1935; Birkeland, 1999). The preferentialredistribution of soil water, through overland or sub-surface pathways in accordance to landscape position,allows for vegetation species with different water use characteristics to coexist in a particular basin (e.g.Stewart and Harrison, 1987; van Wijk and Rodrguez-Iturbe, 2002; Kim and Eltahir, 2004). Once established,vegetation plays a critical role in modifying the hydrologic dynamics in a watershed over the hillslope andchannel reach scale through controls on the water balance and the physical characteristics of the landscape.

    Vegetation impacts on hydrologic dynamics include effects on precipitation due to interception and stemflow(Martnez-Mesa and Whitford, 1996; Abrahams et al., 2003); soil surface temperature due to plant shadowing(Breshears et al., 1998); moisture availability due to plant root water extraction (Scott et al., 2000; Smalland Kurc, 2003); surface resistance to winds and overland runoff (Reid et al., 1999; Breshears et al., 2003);infiltration capacity due to vegetation patches and root channels (Wilcox et al., 2003b; Bhark and Small,2003); contributions of plants to evapotranspiration (Boulanger, 2004; Huxman et al., 2005); and deep vadosezone percolation (Walvoord and Phillips, 2004; Seyfried et al., 2005). Since plants play a fundamental rolein controlling the surface energy and water balance, the differential establishment of vegetation across alandscape can lead to significant spatial variations in ecohydrological dynamics. While the individual effectsof different species on hydrologic dynamics have been investigated, many questions still exist regardingthe emergent vegetation patterns arising in semiarid regions (van Wijk and Rodrguez-Iturbe, 2002; Wilcoxet al., 2003a; Caylor et al., 2005). In this respect, understanding the controls exerted by topography and soildevelopment may lead to identifying the ecohydrological interactions resulting in vegetation patterns.

    Soil properties in the plant root zone are of considerable importance in mediating ecohydrological dynamics(e.g. Fernandez-Illescas et al., 2001; Dodd et al., 2002). An often-overlooked interaction between soilproperties and vegetation are the effects that plants have on material deposition and erosion. Vegetation controlson the production and transport of material have important implications on soil development over long periods(Shreve and Mallery, 1932; Gile et al., 1981). In complex terrain, this is further complicated by pedogenicprocesses that operate in hillslopes (Milne, 1935; Kirkby, 1978; Birkeland, 1999), with material transporteddownslope in response to vegetation-mediated fluxes. As a result, a critical factor in ecohydrological dynamicsis the influences that different plants may have on soil formation and the resulting soil properties (e.g. hydraulicconductivity, organic matter (OM), water retention capacity). As soil formation stores a long-term record ofsurface processes, an analysis of soil properties can provide time-integrated insights on the interaction ofcoexisting plants with geomorphic processes and the history of water fluxes on complex topographic surfaces.

    Soil characteristics controlled by terrain position and vegetation distribution have feedback effects on thesoil properties that determine water availability, retention, and transport (Brooks and Corey, 1964; Rawls andBrakensiek, 1985). For example, water infiltration in semiarid areas is directly related to soil characteristicsthat are mediated by depositional processes, plant litter, soil gas production (Gile et al., 1981; Abrahams andParsons, 1991; Wilcox et al., 2003b) and to some extent by the influence of fauna living under vegetation

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Hydrol. Process. 20, 32893316 (2006)DOI: 10.1002/hyp

  • ECOHYDROLOGY, HYDROLOGIC FLUXES AND SOIL FORMATION 3291

    mounds (e.g. burrowing animals). Soil hydraulic properties, such as conductivity and moisture retention, play acritical role in the partitioning of precipitation into infiltration, runoff,

Recommended

View more >