eatip: progress report, the road ahead and external ... · pdf fileeatip: progress report, the...
TRANSCRIPT
EATIP:Progress Report, the Road Ahead and
External CooperationExternal Cooperation
aqua-tnet - Socrates Thematic Network: Aquaculture, Fisheries and Aquatic Resource Management , Annual Event 2009
Hotel Eden Roc, Sant Feliu de Guixols, Spain, 5-7 October 2009
Torgeir EdvardsenSpecial Advisor, SINTEF Fisheries and Aquaculture, Norway
Board Director EATIP – Coordinator of Thematic Areas
OutlineOutline
� A Brief History
� Why EATIP – How to participate – EATIP Membership
� Strategy, Structure, Processes
� Actions Roadmap for 2009
� NOW: October, 2009� NOW: October, 2009
� focus your talk on what is happening now, moving forward with the EATiP, and your thoughts on how to integrate it with the AQUA-TNET network in specific.
� We have budgeted 40 minutes for this part, and would like to have at least 10-15 minutes discussion.
A Brief HistoryA Brief History
� 1st SM
� IWG
� 2nd SM
� Extended BoD
� TAs
European AquacultureEuropean AquacultureEuropean AquacultureEuropean Aquaculture
eatpTechnology PlatformTechnology PlatformTechnology PlatformTechnology Platform
European AquacultureEuropean AquacultureEuropean AquacultureEuropean Aquaculture
eatpTechnology PlatformTechnology PlatformTechnology PlatformTechnology Platform
� 3rd SM
� EATIP AISBL
Why Why eatipeatip
� EATIP provides a unique opportunity to develop the European
aquaculture value-chain through RTDI through:
� Multi-stakeholder debate and discussion
� Identifying needs, opportunities and gaps
� Developing a Vision for the future
� Providing Strategic Research AgendasProviding Strategic Research Agendas
� Providing Implementation Plans
� Communicating its conclusions and proposals
� To make the concept of EATIP work, appreciation of the goals
and commitment is needed
� This requires effort, positive input and establishing consensus from committed organisations and people
Members
� Commercial Companies � AKVA Group ASA, Norway
� BioMar A/S, Denmark
� Culmarex S.A., Spain
� Grupo Tinamenor SL, Spain
� Intervet Schering-Plough Animal Health, UK
� Inve Aquaculture SA, Belgium
� Marine Harvest AS, Norway
� Seachill Ltd, UK
� Selonda Group, Greece
� Skretting AS(Nutreco Group), Norway
� Research Community � HAKI - Research Institute for Fisheries, Aquaculture
and Irrigation, Hungary
� Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Greece
� IFREMER, France
� INRA, France
� Institute of Aquaculture (IOA), University of Stirling, UK
� Istituto Sperimentale Italiano "Lazzaro Spallanzani, Italy
� Marine Institute, Ireland
Nofima, Norway
List of organisations who have declared interest in Membership of the EATIP
(at 31/08/2008)
� Skretting AS(Nutreco Group), Norway
� Viviers de France SA, France
� Representative organisations � European Association of Fish Processors
� COPA-COGECA, Belgium
� European Feed Manufacturers' Federation (FEFAC), Belgium
� European Mollusc Producers Association, France
� Federation of European Aquaculture Producers (FEAP), France
� International Organisations � International Union for the Conservation of
Nature (IUCN), Spain
� Eurofish, Denmark
� Nofima, Norway
� Norwegian College of Fishery Science (NCFS), Norway
� Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
� Portuguese Institute of Sea and Fisheries Research (IPIMAR), Portugal
� SINTEF Fisheries & Aquaculture, Norway
� University of Ghent, Belgium
� Civil Society Organisations � European Aquaculture Society, Belgium
� AquaTT UETP, Ireland
� European Bureau for Conservation and Development, Belgium
Membership feesMembership fees
SMEs (*)
Turnover M€ QUOTA VOTES Individual Fee
up to 6,25 1 € 500
6,25-12,5 1 € 500
12,5-25 2 € 1,000
25-50 3 € 1,500
50-100 4 € 2,000
Large Companies (*)
RTD Institutions (*)
Aquaculture
researchers and
technicians QUOTA VOTES Individual Fee
1-5 1 € 500
6-10 2 € 1,000
11-20 3 € 1,500
21-40 4 € 2,000
41-80 5 € 2,500Large Companies (*)
Turnover M€ QUOTA VOTES Individual Fee
100-199 6 € 3,000
200-399 9 € 4,500
400-799 14 € 7,000
800-1599 20 € 10,000
1,600-3,200 30 € 15,000
>3,200 45 € 22,500
81+ 6 € 3,000
Associations and Federations
Representative of
aquaculture QUOTA VOTES Individual Fee
Block Fee 5 € 2,500
From CP via TAs to DeliveriesFrom CP via TAs to Deliveries
Core Priorities
� Establishing a strong relationship between aquaculture and the consumer
� The assurance of a sustainable industry� Consolidation of the role of aquaculture in society
Implementation
Plan
Implementation
Plan
Deliverables
VisionVision SRASRA
From CP via TAs to DeliveriesFrom CP via TAs to Deliveries
Process
Core Priorities
� Establishing a strong relationship between aquaculture and the consumer
� The assurance of a sustainable industry� Consolidation of the role of aquaculture in society
Process
Deliverables
Vision
Strategic Research Agenda
Implementation Plan
From CP via TAs to DeliveriesFrom CP via TAs to Deliveries
Thematic Areas
Core Priorities
� Establishing a strong relationship between aquaculture and the consumer
� The assurance of a sustainable industry� Consolidation of the role of aquaculture in society
The Role of Aquaculture in
Society
The Assurance of a
Sustainable Industry
Aquaculture and the
Consumer
Thematic AreasSocietyIndustry
Thematic AreasProduct quality & human safety and health
Technology and systems (engineering)
Managing the biological lifecycle
Sustainable feed production
Interactions with the environment
Aquatic animal health and welfare
Knowledge management
Deliverables
Vision
Strategic Research Agenda
Implementation Plan
Strategy, Structure, ProcessesStrategy, Structure, Processes
Board of Directors
Stakeholders Meeting
Secretariat
� Establishing a strong relationship between aquaculture and the consumer
� The assurance of a sustainable industry� Consolidation of the role of aquaculture in society
The Role of Aquaculture in
Society
The Assurance of a
Sustainable Industry
Aquaculture and the
Consumer
Operative Council
Thematic Areas
Working Groups
SocietyIndustry
Thematic AreasProduct quality & human safety and health
Technology and systems (engineering)
Managing the biological lifecycle
Sustainable feed production
Interactions with the environment
Aquatic animal health and welfare
Knowledge management
Work in the Thematic AreasWork in the Thematic Areas
� The TAs (& WGs) are the driving force of EATIP!
� Primary objective of the Thematic Areas: Develop the Strategic Research Agenda within their subject fields
� Chairs (industry) & Facilitators (research) are organisers and coordinators of the Tas, responsible for:and coordinators of the Tas, responsible for:
� Populating the Thematic Areas
� Proposing related Working Groups & their composition
� Convening meetings & reporting from them
� Providing recommendations to the Board
RoadmappingRoadmapping
Future state of art and practice
The RoadmapThe Gap Analysis
Current state of art and practice
The RoadmapThe Gap Analysis
Where are the RTDI voids?
Which are the current RTDI areas where little research is being conducted?
Which are the current RTDI areas that are heavily supported?
Rankings, Priorities, Scheduling
TA Product quality, human safety & healthTA Product quality, human safety & health
Quality
SafetyConsumer perceptions
& reputation Safety
Human Health & Nutrition
Industry’ s requirements
& reputation management
CORE
GROUP
Topics suggestedTopics suggested
Quality
SafetyFeed formulation
Supply chain impacts
Sensory qualities
Safety
Contaminants
Processes
Human Health & Nutrition
Dietary contribution Benefits
What is the Operating Council?What is the Operating Council?
� Chairs and Facilitators of the TAs
� Plus 2 Directors and General Secretary
� Plus observers (e.g. Commission)
� Operating Council has to agree on gaps in RTDI
� Define – Justify – Prioritise <--- = Roadmapping
� Provide recommendations to the Stakeholders Meeting & the Board
Positioning the EATIP in 2009Positioning the EATIP in 2009
SRA DevelopmentGaps in knowledgeTopicsBackgroundPrioritiesScheduling
Consultation
Drafting 1st EATiP
Promotion
Thematic Areas & WGs
3rd Stakeholder Forum
Jan-feb Mar-apr May-jun jul-aug Sep-okt Nov-dec
SchedulingDrafting 1 EATiP
Strategic Research
AgendaReview of Draft Vision Document
Positioning the EATIP in 2009Positioning the EATIP in 2009
SRA DevelopmentGaps in knowledgeTopicsBackgroundPrioritiesScheduling
Consultation
Drafting 1st EATiP
Promotion
Thematic Areas & WGs
EnablersEnablers� Cooperation
� Projects
� Becoteps
� Marcom+
CooperationCooperation•• Other Other ETPsETPs•• EASEAS•• AquaTTAquaTT UETPUETP•• AQUA AQUA TnetTnet??
3rd Stakeholder Forum
Jan-feb Mar-apr May-jun jul-aug Sep-okt Nov-dec
SchedulingDrafting 1 EATiP
Strategic Research
AgendaReview of Draft Vision Document
Marcom+
� AQASEM
� Aquainnova
� Funding of Operations
� Membership Fees
Intensified WG, TA
& OC work?
3rd Stakeholder Forum 4th Stakeholder Forum
Jan-feb Mar-apr May-jun jul-aug Sep-okt Nov-dec
FUNDING
being
established
Jan-feb Mar-apr May-jun jul-aug
Intensified WG, TA ?
4th Stakeholder Forum
Nov-dec
FUNDING
being
established
Jan-feb Mar-apr May-jun jul-aug
Intensified WG, TA
& OC work?
Implementation
Plan
Implementation
Plan
VisionVision
SRASRA
Intensified WG, TA ?
� Regional Policy (Structural Fund/Cohesion Fund)� European Agricultural fund for rural development� European Fisheries Fund� Marco Polo II Programme (transport)� FP7� CIP (Competitiveness and Innovation Framework
Programme - enterprises)� LIFE+ (Financial instrument for the environment)� Education and training programmes� Loan financing� ……
4th Stakeholder Forum
Nov-dec
FUNDING
being
established
Jan-feb Mar-apr May-jun jul-aug
Intensified WG, TA
& OC work?
Implementation
Plan
Implementation
Plan
VisionVision
SRASRA
Stakeholder investments
To sum up ……To sum up ……
Educational needs Educational needs
Aquaculture standing in society
Aquaculture standing in society
Research needs
Core Priorities
Educational needs in Aquaculture
Educational needs in Aquaculture
Management Capacity !!Management Capacity !!
Furthermore Furthermore
TP Evaluation Report:� Education and Training�
�
�
“…. ETPs have clearly
The Role of Aquaculture in
Society
The Assurance of a
Sustainable Industry
Aquaculture and the
Consumer
Thematic AreasProduct quality & human safety and health
Technology and systems (engineering) “…. ETPs have clearly underachieved on this matter so far.”
Technology and systems (engineering)
Managing the biological lifecycle
Sustainable feed production
Interactions with the environment
Aquatic animal health and welfare
Knowledge management
Furthermore Furthermore
The Role of Aquaculture in
Society
The Assurance of a
Sustainable Industry
Aquaculture and the
Consumer
Thematic AreasProduct quality & human safety and health
Technology and systems (engineering)
5th LEG Report:� Joint trans-national action
need to be identified and capitalized upon.
� need for more coordination and coherence between levels
Technology and systems (engineering)
Managing the biological lifecycle
Sustainable feed production
Interactions with the environment
Aquatic animal health and welfare
Knowledge management
and coherence between levels(EU, national, regional) and domains (education, research, environment..)
5th LEG Report: “Lisbon Strategy: Between revolution and illusion”
A possibility ……A possibility ……
The Role of Aquaculture in
Society
The Assurance of a
Sustainable Industry
Aquaculture and the
Consumer
Thematic AreasProduct quality & human safety and health
Technology and systems (engineering)Technology and systems (engineering)
Managing the biological lifecycle
Sustainable feed production
Interactions with the environment
Aquatic animal health and welfare
Knowledge management ?
I welcome …:I welcome …:
� A discussion on Cooperation EATIP – aqua-tnet
� EATIP is yours – use it
� Expression of Interest (?)
� Solving the Management Capacity challenge (+)
www.EATIP.eu
Thank you!
Torgeir EdvardsenEATIP Board of Directors – Coordinator of Thematic Areas
Address: SINTEF Fisheries and Aquaculture, N-7465 Trondheim, NorwayTelephone: +47 9111 6501 – E-mail: [email protected]
EATIP Purpose EATIP Purpose –– It’s MissionIt’s Mission
� Premise: Europe needs more fish!
� More fish from EU aquaculture ==> more RTDI
� An aquaculture sector with a common agenda will contribute to EU policies
� An aquaculture sector with a common agenda will contribute to EU policies
Therefore: Therefore: a New European Aquaculture RTDI drivea New European Aquaculture RTDI drive
………is needed………is needed
Therefore ……Therefore ……
� We need to integrate broader and better
� develop common priorities (= Vision and SRA), eg for RTDI;
� ensure better leverage to address particular issues (eg. legislation, international cooperation);
� efficient and effective use of resources (people, knowledge, capacities, capital);capacities, capital);
� develop umbrella organisation (= EATIP); representing the whole sector, all stakeholders;
� speak with one voice
All stakeholders must participateAll stakeholders must participate–– for the common goodfor the common goodTwo-way-learning
Win-win
Aquaculture AmbitionsAquaculture Ambitions
� To provide desirable products of the highest quality for the European consumer
� To use aquaculture processes that have minimal environmental impact
� High performance feeds and inputs that are safe and made from sustainable resourcesmade from sustainable resources
� Develop the technical, managerial and financial capacity to invest (…..in offshore and innovative production facilities….)
� Assurance of livestock welfare, at all life stages