easy grid analysis method (egam)

1
Easy Grid Analysis Method (EGAM) for a central observing and controlling system in the low voltage grid for E-Mobility and Renewable Integration Methods In this case a DC load flow analysis method including elec- tric current iteration with following adoptions is chosen: Demand of consumers and sources are stated. All loads are symmetric and therefore the positive- sequence polyphase system can be used. Radial grid systems without intermeshing. Project KOFLA This easy grid analysis method is developed in the project KOFLA, which is funded by the program “ways2go“ of the Austrian Federal Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Tech- nology. Centralized broker mediates between the moving electric vehicles (EV) requesting service and the recharging sta- tions offering recharge capacity. Find the best match for each user and balance the electric grid load between recharg- ing stations. Abstract: DC load flow analysis method including electric current iteration for calculation the available power of each charging station in the low voltage grid. EGAM is imple- mented in a routing and charging system, which avoid grid overloads by scheduling EV charging loads. Figure 1: Model grid of a radial system Methods and Equations Electric Current Iteration: Results (1) Low voltage grid in the city of Bregenz, Vorarlberg - Austria, with households, companies and several offices. Simulation software NEPLAN with an extended Newton Raphson calculation. Figure 3: Compari- son results of the load calculation with correction values Results (2) Node Voltage failure between 0.22% and 0.14% 72% of all calculations have a max. grid losses failure ±5%, but the total failure can be up to 25% Figure 4: Comparison results of the reactive power Conclusions and Outlook Calculation results of the load flow are exact and compu- tation times are fast enough. Grid losses computations get only recommendations for saving energy in the grid and no exact values. Grid Losses: Figure 5: Overall grid losses over the charging power of two charging stations “Kooperative Fahrerunterstützung für Lademanagement von elektrischen Fahrzeugen” Figure 2: Flow chart of the Easy Grid Analysis Method DC-LF: Institute of Energy Systems and Electrical Drives Vienna University of Technology Gusshausstr. 25 / 370-1, 1040 Vienna, Austria http://www.ea.tuwien.ac.at Andreas SCHUSTER, MSc Project assistant E: [email protected] T: +43 1 58801 370134

Upload: others

Post on 22-Dec-2021

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Easy Grid Analysis Method (EGAM)

Easy Grid Analysis Method (EGAM) for a central observing and controlling system in the low voltage grid for E-Mobility and Renewable Integration

Methods

In this case a DC load flow analysis method including elec-

tric current iteration with following adoptions is chosen:

Demand of consumers and sources are stated.

All loads are symmetric and therefore the positive-

sequence polyphase system can be used.

Radial grid systems without intermeshing.

Project KOFLA This easy grid analysis method is developed in the project

KOFLA, which is funded by the program “ways2go“ of the

Austrian Federal Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Tech-

nology.

Centralized broker mediates between the moving electric

vehicles (EV) requesting service and the recharging sta-

tions offering recharge capacity.

Find the best match for each user and balance the electric

grid load between recharg-

ing stations.

Abstract: DC load flow analysis method including electric current iteration for calculation the available power of each charging station in the low voltage grid. EGAM is imple-mented in a routing and charging system, which avoid grid overloads by scheduling EV charging loads.

Figure 1: Model grid of a radial system

Methods and Equations

Electric Current Iteration:

Results (1)

Low voltage grid in the city of Bregenz, Vorarlberg -

Austria, with households, companies and several offices.

Simulation software NEPLAN with an extended Newton

Raphson calculation.

Figure 3: Compari-son results of the load calculation with correction values

Results (2)

Node Voltage failure between –0.22% and 0.14%

72% of all calculations have a max. grid losses failure

±5%, but the total failure can be up to –25%

Figure 4: Comparison results of the reactive power

Conclusions and Outlook

Calculation results of the load flow are exact and compu-

tation times are fast enough.

Grid losses computations get only recommendations for

saving energy in the grid and no exact values.

Grid Losses:

Figure 5: Overall grid losses over the charging power of two charging stations

“Kooperative Fahrerunterstützung für Lademanagement von elektrischen Fahrzeugen”

Figure 2: Flow chart of the Easy Grid Analysis Method

DC-LF:

Institute of Energy Systems and Electrical Drives

Vienna University of Technology

Gusshausstr. 25 / 370-1, 1040 Vienna, Austria

http://www.ea.tuwien.ac.at

Andreas SCHUSTER, MSc

Project assistant

E: [email protected]

T: +43 1 58801 370134