eart160 planetary sciences
DESCRIPTION
EART160 Planetary Sciences. Introductions. Course Overview. Foundation class for Planetary Sciences pathway Introduction to formation and evolution of planetary bodies in this Solar System Focus on surfaces, interiors and atmospheres of planetary bodies, especially solid ones. Course Outline. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
EART160 Planetary Sciences
Introductions
Course Overview• Foundation class for Planetary Sciences pathway• Introduction to formation and evolution of planetary
bodies in this Solar System• Focus on surfaces, interiors and atmospheres of
planetary bodies, especially solid ones
Course Outline• See syllabus.
Logistics• Website: http://people.ucsc.edu/~igarrick/EART160• Optional text – Hartmann, Moons & Planets, 5th ed.• Prerequisites
– One of: Math 11B or 19B; and– One of: Phys 6A or Phys 5A.
• WARNING: I am going to assume a good working knowledge of single-variable calculus and freshman physics. You will need to be able to set up and solve “word problems”. Don’t be under any illusions – this is a quantitative course.
• Grading – based on weekly homeworks (25%), midterm (25%), term paper (25%), final (25%).
• Homeworks due weekly• Plagiarism – see Syllabus for policy (posted on web)• Office hours – see Syllabus, or by appointment, A137 E&MS
(email: [email protected])• TA: None• Questions? - Yes please!
Expectations• Homework typically consists of 3 questions
• If it’s taking you more than 1 hour per question on average come and see me
• Late homework penalized by 10% per day
• Midterm/finals consist of short (compulsory) and long (pick from a list) questions
• Showing up and asking questions are usually routes to a good grade
Summer Research Opportunities• There are a number of programs, usually paid, for
summer undergraduate research positions in planetary science
• I will put a list of some of these programs on the class website
http://people.ucsc.edu/~igarrick/EART160
Next two classes• Introductory stuff• Highlights• Formation of the solar system and planets:
• What is the Solar System made of?• How and how fast did the planets form?• How have they evolved subsequently?• [How typical is our Solar System?]
Don’t hesitate to ask questions – it’s what I’m here for
Apollo: the birth of planetary science
Highlights (1)1. The surface of Titan 2. Itokawa
Sample return.
What is thefluid?
Highlights (2)3. Subsurface oceans
How do we know?
Highlights (3)4. Enceladus geysers 5. Direct imaging of exoplanets
250 km diameter
What is the energy source?
HR8799
Any Earths out there?
Extrasolar planets• Sun-like star Gliese 370 and its “Goldilocks” planet 85512b.• 3.6 times as massive as the Earth. • 36 light-years away, in the constellation Vela.• How do we know if
it supports water?
Selected MissionsMission Target Dates Agency NotesCassini/Huygens Saturn 1997- NASA/ESA
MER Mars 2003- NASA 1 still going . . .
Mars Express Mars 2003- ESA First Mars radar
MESSENGER Mercury 2004- NASA In orbit
Rosetta Comet 2004- ESA In orbit
New Horizons Pluto 2006- NASA Complete
Dawn Vesta/Ceres 2007- NASA Vesta ‘12/Ceres 15
L.R.O./GRAIL Moon 2009/2011 NASA Lunar orbiters
Kepler Exoplanets 2009 NASA Completed
M.S.L. Mars 2012- NASA On surface
Maven Mars 2013 NASA In orbit
Insight Mars 2016 NASA
OSIRISRex Asteroid 2018 NASA Sample return
Mission HighlightsMoon
Kaguya (Japan)
Chandrayaan-1 (India)
Chang’e (China)
Mercury, the last unknown (MESSENGER)
Mission HighlightsGRAIL
Other lunar missions
Chandrayaan 2Chang’e-3
LADEE
Mars Science Laboratory
Kepler (2009-2013)• 0.3 percent sky field of
view. Transit method.• > 100 confirmed
exoplanets, >3000 unconfirmed.
• By inference, 17 billion Earth-sized planets in the galaxy (2 billion habitable).– 1021 in the universe.
• $550 million 95 Mpixels
NASA budget, the James Webb Telescope, and the future of robotic
exploration.
Titan mare explorer, ~$500M
James Webb - $8B
Micro Moon Impactors, ~$25M
What I work on
Lunar samples
Lunar swirls
Low cost missions
Lunar cubesat impactor
Berkeley CINEMA cubesat
CINEMA 1 & P-POD
Measures: 1) Magnetic fields and 2) Particle fluxes.
Scheduled launch September 2012
NSF funding one unit, Air Force funding two more
units. Kyung Hee University (Korea) building two more.
http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/cinema/
NPSCuL Integration
Assembled STEIN Flight Instrument
STEIN 32-pixel detector & ASIC electronics
CINEMA instruments1 m boom
magnetometer
What does the Solar System consist of?
• The Sun is 99.85% of the mass (78% H, 20% He)
• Eight Planets
• Satellites• A bunch of other stuff (dwarf planets, comets,
asteroids, Kuiper Belt Objects etc.)
Where is everything?
J S U N P
1 AU is the mean Sun-Earth distance = 150 million kmNearest star (Proxima Centauri) is 4.2 LY=265,000 AU
KB
Me V E Ma
Note log scales!
Inner solar system
5 AU1.5 AU
Outer solar system
30 AU
Note logarithmic scales!Me V MaE
Gas giants Ice giants Terrestrial planets
Basic dataDistance (AU)
Porbital (yrs)
Protation
(days)
Mass (1024kg)
Radius (km)
(g cm-3)
Sun - - 24.7 2x106 695950 1.41
Mercury 0.38 0.24 58.6 0.33 2437 5.43
Venus 0.72 0.62 243.0R 4.87 6052 5.24
Earth 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.97 6371 5.52
Mars 1.52 1.88 1.03 0.64 3390 3.93
Jupiter 5.20 11.86 0.41 1899 71492 1.33
Saturn 9.57 29.60 0.44 568 60268 0.68
Uranus 19.19 84.06 0.72R 86.6 24973 1.32
Neptune 30.07 165.9 0.67 102.4 24764 1.64
Pluto 39.54 248.6 6.39R 0.013 1152 2.05See e.g. Lodders and Fegley, Planetary Scientist’s Companion
Solar System Formation
• The basic characteristics of this Solar System – composition, mass distribution, angular momentum distribution – are mainly determined by the manner in which the solar system originally formed
• So to understand the subsequent evolution of the planets (and other objects), we need to understand how they formed
In the beginning . . .• Elements are generated by nucleosynthesis within stars• Heavier elements (up to Fe) are formed by fusion of
lighter elements: H -> He -> C -> O• Elements beyond Fe are produced by nuclei absorbing
neutrons• Elements are scattered during stellar explosions (supernovae) and form clouds of material (nebulae) ready to form the next generation of stars and planets
Elem
ental abundance(log scale)
From Albarede, Geochemistry: An introduction
Solar System Formation - Overview• Some event (e.g. nearby supernova) triggers
gravitational collapse of a cloud (nebula) of dust and gas• As the nebula collapses, it forms a spinning disk (due to
conservation of angular momentum)• The collapse releases gravitational energy, which heats
the centre; this central hot portion forms a star• The outer, cooler particles suffer repeated collisions,
building planet-sized bodies from dust grains (accretion)• Young stellar activity (T-Tauri phase) blows off any
remaining gas and leaves an embryonic solar system• These argument suggest that the planets and the Sun
should all have (more or less) the same composition• Comets and meteorites are important because they are
relatively pristine remnants of the original nebula
Motivation/Observations
Motivation/Observations
~4 light years in length
An Artist’s Impression
The young Sun gas/dustnebula
solid planetesimals
Jeans Collapse• A perturbation will cause the density to increase locally• Increased density -> increased gravity -> more material
gets sucked in -> runaway process (Jeans collapse)
Gravitational potential energy R
GM 2
~Collapsing cloud
R
M,
Thermal energy M
kTkTN ~~
Equating these two and using M~R3 we get:
2~
RG
kTcrit
Does this make sense?
Example: R=60 light years T=50 K gives crit~10-20 kg m-3 This is 6 atoms per c.c. (a few times the typical interstellar value)
M=mass =densityk=Boltzmann’s constant=atomic weightN=no. of atomsT=temperature (K)
Sequence of events• 1. Nebular disk formation• 2. Initial coagulation, orderly growth
(~1-10km, ~104 yrs)
• 3. Runaway growth (to Moon size, ~105 yrs)
• 4. Oligarchic growth to “embryos” (to Mars size, ~106 yrs), gas loss (?) (10s to 100s of Moon to Mars size bodies)
• 5. Late-stage collisions (~107-8 yrs, giant impacts, planets form)
Accretion timescales (1)
Planet density
PlanetesimalSwarm, density s
RfR
vorb
fvRdtdM s2~/
• Consider a protoplanet moving through a planetesimal swarm. We have where v is the relative velocity and f is a factor which arises because the gravitational cross-sectional area exceeds the real c.s.a.
f is the Safronov number:
))/8(1(
))/(1(22
2
vRG
vvf e
Where doesthis come from?
where ve is the escape velocity, G is the gravitational constant, is the planet density. So:
))/8(1(~/ 222 vRGvRdtdM s
Accretion timescales (2)• Two end-members:
– 8GR2 << v2 so dM/dt ~ R2 which means all bodies increase in radius at same rate – orderly growth
– 8GR2 >> v2 so dM/dt ~ R4 which means largest bodies grow fastest – runaway growth
– So beyond some critical size (~10 km size), the largest bodies will grow fastest and accrete the bulk of the mass
a, AU s,g cm-2 n, s-1 , Myr
1 10 2x10-7 5
5 1 2x10-8 500
25 0.1 2x10-9 50,000
Approximate timescales to form an Earth-like planet. Here we are using f=10, =5.5 g/cc. In practice, f will increase as R increases. Here is the nebular density per unit area and n is 2/orbital period.
Note that forming Neptune is problematic!
•Growth timescale increases with increasing distance (why?):
Late-Stage Accretion• Once each planet has swept up debris out of the area where its gravity
dominates that of the Sun (its feeding zone, or Hill sphere), accretion slows down again: start of oligarchic growth (not covered in detail) Growth from lunar to Mars-size at 1 AU in millions of years.
• Finally, collisions only occur because of mutual perturbations between planets, timescale ~107-8 yrs – planetary dynamics.
Agnor et al. Icarus 1999
How did the Moon form?
• Why didn’t it fall back into the Earth?
• Would we be here without a Moon?
• Why does Venus rotate so slowly?
Last impacts – Topography of Mars
Giant Impact on Mars
Lunar impacts
South Pole Aitken basin
Complications• 1) Timing of gas loss
– Presence of gas tends to cause planets to spiral inwards, hence timing of gas loss is important
– Since outer planets can accrete gas if large enough, the relative timescales of planetary growth and gas loss are important
• 2) “Snow line”– More solid material is available beyond the snow line, which allows planets to
grow more rapidly
• 3) Jupiter formation– Jupiter is so massive that it significantly perturbs the nearby area e.g. it
scattered so much material from the asteroid belt that a planet never formed there
– It must have formed early, while the nebular gas was still present.
Nice model• Solar system formed compact
• Icy Pluto-like planetesimals abundant outside the four gas/ice giants
• Planetesimals interact with JSNU
• Jupiter shifts inward as it scatters objects
• Jup. and Sat. enter mean motion resonance, increasing their eccentricities after ~500 My
• Destabilizes the entire system
• Quicktime movie
Nice Model
Simulation showing the outer planets and planetesimal belt: a) early configuration, before Jupiter and Saturn reach a 2:1 resonance; b) scattering of planetesimals into the inner Solar System after the orbital shift of Neptune (dark blue) and Uranus (light blue); c) after ejection of planetesimals by planets.
Simulation showing the outer planets and theKuiper belt: a) Before Jupiter–Saturn 2:1 resonance. b) Scattering of Kuiper belt objects into the Solar System after the orbital shift of Neptune. c) After ejection of Kuiper belt bodies by Jupiter. Planets shown: Jupiter (green circle), Saturn (orange circle), Uranus (light blue circle), and Neptune (dark blue circle). Simulation created using data from the Nice Model.
Observations (2)• We can use the present-
day observed planetary masses and compositions to reconstruct how much mass was there initially – the minimum mass solar nebula
• This gives us a constraint on the initial nebula conditions e.g. how rapidly did its density fall off with distance?
• The picture gets more complicated if the planets have moved . . .
• The observed change in planetary compositions with distance gives us another clue – silicates and iron close to the Sun, volatile elements more common further out
Cartoon of Nebular Processes
• Scale height increases radially (why?)
• Magnetic field slows the stellar spin rate (how?)
• Temperatures decrease radially – consequence of lower irradiation, and lower
surface density and optical depth leading to more efficient cooling
Polar jets
Stellar magnetic field (sweeps innermost disk clear, reduces stellar spin rate)
Disk cools by radiation
Dust grains Infallingmaterial
Nebula disk(dust/gas)
Hot, high
Cold, low
T-Tauri Star
• ~10 My phase of stellar evolution before a star starts to burn hydrogen (main sequence star).
• Anomalously bright due to:– Large surface area (still-collapsing)– Large release of gravitational energy
• Blows away nebula gases very rapidly via intense stellar winds
Observations (1)• Early stages of solar system formation can be imaged directly – dust
disks have large surface area, radiate effectively in the infra-red
• Unfortunately, once planets form, the IR signal disappears. Until very recently we couldn’t detect planets (now we know of >1000)
• Timescale of clearing of nebula (~1-10 Myr) is known because young stellar ages are easy to determine from mass/luminosity/age relationships.
This is a Hubble image of a young solarsystem. You can see the vertical greenplasma jet which is guided by the star’smagnetic field. The white zones are gasand dust, being illuminated from inside bythe young star. The dark central zone is where the dust is so optically thick that the light is not being transmitted.
Thick disk
What is the nebular composition?• Why do we care? It will control what the planets are
made of!• How do we know?
– Composition of the Sun (photosphere)
– Primitive meteorites (see below)
– (Remote sensing of other solar systems - not yet very useful)
• An important result is that the solar photosphere and the primitive meteorites give very similar answers: this gives us confidence that our estimates of nebular composition are correct
Solar photosphere• Visible surface of the Sun
• Assumed to represent the bulk solar composition (is this a good assumption?)
• Compositions are obtained by spectroscopy
• Only source of information on the most volatile elements (which are depleted in meteorites): H,C,N,O
Note sunspots(roughly Earth-size)
1.4
mil
lion
km
Primitive Meteorites• Meteorites fall to Earth and can be analyzed• Radiometric dating techniques suggest that they formed
during solar system formation (4.56 Gyr B.P.)• Carbonaceous (CI) chondrites contain chondrules and
do not appear to have been significantly altered
1cm chondrules
• They are also rich in volatile elements
• Compositions are very similar to Comet Halley, also assumed to be ancient, unaltered and volatile-rich
Meteorites vs. Photosphere
Basaltic Volcanism Terrestrial Planets, 1981
• This plot shows the striking similarity between meteoritic and photospheric compositions
• Note that volatiles (N,C,O) are enriched in photosphere relative to meteorites
• We can use this information to obtain a best-guess nebular composition
Nebular Composition• Based on solar photosphere and chondrite compositions,
we can come up with a best-guess at the nebular composition (here relative to 106 Si atoms):
Data from Lodders and Fegley, Planetary Scientist’s Companion, CUP, 1998This is for all elements with relative abundances > 105 atoms.
Element H He C N O Ne Mg Si S Ar Fe
Log10 (No. Atoms)
10.44 9.44 7.00 6.42 7.32 6.52 6.0 6.0 5.65 5.05 5.95
Condens.
Temp (K)
180 -- 78 120 -- -- 1340 1529 674 40 1337
• Blue are volatile, red are refractory• Most important refractory elements are Mg, Si, Fe, S
Planetary Compositions• Which elements actually condense will depend on the
local nebular conditions (temperature)• E.g. volatile species will only be stable in solid form
and able to accrete beyond a “snow line”. This is why the inner planets are rock-rich and the outer planets gas- and ice-rich
• The compounds formed from the elements will be determined by temperature (see next slide)
• The rates at which reactions occur are also governed by temperature. In the outer solar system, reaction rates may be so slow that the equilibrium condensation compounds are not produced
Three kinds of planets . . .• Nebular material can be divided into “gas” (mainly
H/He), “ice” (CH4,H2O,NH3 etc.) and “rock” (including metals)
• Planets tend to be dominated by one of these three end-members
• Proportions of gas/ice/rock are roughly 100/2/1 (Lodders 2003)
• The compounds which actually condense will depend on the local nebular conditions (temperature)• E.g. volatile species will only be stable beyond a “snow line”. This is one reason why the inner planets are rock-rich and the outer planets gas- and ice-rich.
Gas-rich
Ice-rich
Rock-rich
Temperature and Condensation
Temperature profiles in a young (T Tauri) stellar nebula, D’Alessio et al., A.J. 1998
Nebular conditions can be used to predict what components of the solar nebula will be present as gases or solids:
Condensation behaviour of most abundant elements of solar nebula e.g. C is stable as CO above 1000K, CH4 above 60K, and then condenses to CH4.6H2O.From Lissauer and DePater, Planetary Sciences
Nebula mid-plane
Solar photosphere
Earth Saturn
Terrestrial (silicate) planets
• Consist mainly of silicates ((Fe,Mg)SiO4) and iron (plus FeS)
• Mercury is iron-rich, perhaps because it lost its mantle during a giant impact (more on this later)?
• Volatile compounds (H2O,CO2 etc.) uncommon in the inner solar system because of the initially hot nebular conditions
• Some volatiles may have been supplied later by comets
• Satellites like Ganymede have similar structures but have an ice layer on top (volatiles are more common in the outer nebula)
Mercury
Venus Earth
Moon
Mars
Ganymede
Io
Gas and Ice Giants• Jupiter and Saturn consist mainly of He/H with a
rock-ice core of ~10 Earth masses
• Their cores grew fast enough that they captured the nebular gas before it was blown off
• Uranus and Neptune are primarily ices (CH4,H2O,NH3 etc.) covered with a thick He/H atmosphere
• Their cores grew more slowly and captured less gas.
Figure from Guillot, Physics Today, (2004). Sizes are to scale. Yellow is molecular hydrogen, red is metallic hydrogen, ices are blue, rock is grey. Note that ices are not just water ice, but also frozen methane, ammonia etc.
90% H/He
75% H/He
10% H/He
10% H/He
Forming Jupiters• Individual gas giants probably form by gas accreting
onto a pre-existing large solid planet• How big does the initial solid planet have to be?
Gravitational P.E. per unitmass of gas R
GM~R
Thermal energy per unit mass of gas
kTN~
Equating these two and using M~R3 we get:
2/12/3
~
G
NkTM crit
Does this make sense?
M=mass =densityk=Boltzmann’s constantN=no. of atoms per kgT=temperature (K)
M,Solid core
Gas
Example: =5000 kg m-3 T=1000 K gives Mcrit~ 6x1023 kg (=Earth)This is actually a bit low – real value is more like 8-10 MEarth
How old is the solar system?• We date the solar system using the decay of long-lived radioactive
nuclides e.g. 238U-206Pb (4.47 Gyr), 235U-207Pb (0.70 Gyr)• These nuclides were formed during a supernova.• The oldest objects are certain meteorites, which have an age of
4567 Myr B.P. (see figure)
• Some meteorites once contained live 26Al, which has a half-life of only 0.7 Myr. So these meteorites must have formed within a few Myr of 26Al production (in the supernova).• So the solar system itself is also 4567 Myr old Meteorite isochron (from Albarede,
Geochemistry: An Introduction)
Summary• Solar system formation involved collapse of a large gas
cloud, triggered by a supernova (which also generated many of the elements)
• Solar system originally consisted of gas:ice:rock in ratio 100:2:1 (solar photosphere; primitive meteorites)
• Initial nebula was dense and hot near the sun, thinner, colder further out
• Inner planets are mainly rock; outer planets (beyond the snow line) also include ice and (if massive enough) gas
• Planets grow by collisions; Mars-sized bodies formed within ~1 Myr of solar system formation
• Late-stage accretion is slow and involved large impacts
Important Concepts• Minimum mass solar nebula• Stellar nucleosynthesis• Solar photosphere• Jeans collapse• T-Tauri phase & gas loss• Nice model• Carbonaceous chondrite• Accretion• Escape velocity• Snow line• Planetesimals• Runaway growth• Astronomical unit (AU)
End of Lecture
Hertzprung-Russell Diagram