early ju ras sic sauropod foot prints of the south er n

Geo log i cal Quar terly, 2009, 53 (4): 461–470

Early Ju ras sic sauropod foot prints of the South ern Carpathians, Ro ma nia:palaeo bio logi cal and palaeo geo graphi cal sig nif i cance

Grzegorz PIEŃKOWSKI, Mihai E. POPA and Artur KĘDZIOR

Pieńkowski G., Popa M. E. and Kędzior A. (2009) — Early Ju ras sic sauropod foot prints of the South ern Carpathians, Ro ma nia: palaeo -bio logi cal and palaeo geo graphi cal sig nif i cance. Geol. Quart., 53 (4): 461–470. Warszawa.

The di no saur foot prints cf. Parabrontopodus isp. Lockley, Farlow et Meyer, 1994, at trib uted to sauro pods, have been found inHettangian (ear li est Ju ras sic) al lu vial de pos its in Anina (Colonia Cehă Quarry, Reşiţa Ba sin), be long ing to the Getic Nappe in the South -ern Carpathians, West ern Ro ma nia. Heteropodous pes-manus sets and one short, nar row-gauge trackway have been rec og nized on alarge sand stone sur face tram pled by sauro pods. A greater load was car ried by the in ner dig its of the pes, par tic u larly digit I, and the heelpad is deeply im printed, which points to a sub-plantigrade pes and gravipodal pos ture, typ i cal for Eusaropoda. A pentadactyl manus im -print sug gests that manus dig its of early sauro pods might have been sep a rate and per haps more func tional when sup port ing walk ing onun sta ble, sticky ground. These tracks, the first find of Ju ras sic di no saur foot prints in Ro ma nia, add an im por tant site to the rel a tively rarere cord of ear li est Ju ras sic sauropod foot prints. These tracks also con firm that Pangaean is lands and pen in su las around the West ernTethys were in hab ited by early sauro pods. These pen in su las or is lands, in clud ing a hy po thet i cal “Moesian Is land”, must have been atleast tem po rarily con nected with the main land. The sizes of the Ro ma nian foot prints are sim i lar to the Hettangian Parabrontopodus isp.tracks de scribed from Po land (main land Pangaea — Eur asian area) and It aly (Tethyan do main) and do not in di cate in su lar dwarf ism.

Grzegorz Pieńkowski, Pol ish Geo log i cal In sti tute–Na tional Re search In sti tute, Rakowiecka 4, PL-00-975 Warszawa, Po land; e-mail:[email protected]; Mihai E. Popa, Uni ver sity of Bu cha rest, Fac ulty of Ge ol ogy and Geo phys ics, Lab o ra tory of Palae on -tol ogy, 1, N. Balcescu Ave., 010041, Bu cha rest, Ro ma nia; e-mail: [email protected]; Artur Kędzior, Pol ish Acad emy of Sci ence, In -sti tute of Geo log i cal Sci ences, Kraków Re search Cen tre, Senacka 1, PL-31-002 Kraków, Po land; e-mail: [email protected](re ceived: Oc to ber 27, 2009; ac cepted: De cem ber 12, 2009).

Key words: Parabrontopodus, sauro pods, Ro ma nia, Hettangian, gravipodal pos ture, palaeobiogeographyn.

INTRODUCTION

Rel a tively very few un equiv o cal ex am ples of sauropodtracks are known in Early Ju ras sic strata world wide (Lockley etal., 1994b), even though true sauro pods (Eusauropoda —Upchurch, 1993, 1994) bones are known from this ep och, suchas Vulcanodon karibaensis Raath 1972 from Af rica (Raath,1972; Cruickshank, 1975; Coo per, 1984) and frag men tary pre -served re mains from other con ti nents, in clud ing Sanpasaurus,Zizhongosaurus and Kunmingosaurus from China (Dong et al.,1983; Dong, 1992), Ohmdenosaurus from Ger many (Wild,1978), and Barapasaurus from In dia (Jain et al., 1979). Themost im por tant sites with Early Ju ras sic sauropod foot printscom prise Hettangian sites in North ern It aly (Leonardi andLanzinger, 1992; Dalla Vecchia, 1994; Avanzini and Petti,2008; Avanzini et al., 2008) and Cen tral Po land (Gierliński,1997; Gierliński and Sawicki, 1998; Gierliński and Pień kowski,

1999; Gierliński et al., 2004). Be sides Hettangian strata,sauropod tracks have been also found in Pliensbachian strata ofMo rocco (Ishigaki, 1989; Farlow, 1992). Finds of both body and trace fos sils, scat tered around the globe, sug gest that Early Ju ras -sic sauro pods were geo graph i cally wide spread. How ever, truesauropod (Eusauropoda) foot prints and body fos sils are ab sentfrom Early Ju ras sic de pos its in North Amer ica (Hunt et al., 1994; Olsen et al., 2002), sug gest ing the ex is tence of a bar rier sit u atedalong the Cen tral At lan tic Rift, which pre vented mi gra tion of di -no saurs to North Amer ica from the rest of Pangaea (Fig. 1). Anal ter na tive ex pla na tion would in volve cli ma tic dif fer ences, com -bined with hab i tat re quire ments of sauro pods (drier con di tions in North Amer ica), caus ing bioprovincialism of di no saurs. TheHettangian time in ter val was an im por tant stage in the evo lu tionof sauro pods, also in terms of prin ci pal pos ture changes in thefore- and hindlimbs, which in flu enced the shape of their foot -prints (Wil son and Sereno, 1998). There fore, any find ofsauropod tracks of that age is sig nif i cant in an swer ing both

462 Grzegorz Pieńkowski, Mihai E. Popa and Artur Kędzior

Fig. 1. A — Lo ca tions of the Reşiţa Ba sin and Colonia Ceh² Quarry on a geo log i cal map of the Anina Anticline; B — Early Ju ras sic palaeo ge ogra phy with ma jor sites of Early Ju ras sic sauro pods — bone re mains (Zim ba bwe) and foot prints; C — out lined area of “B” show ing palaeo ge ogra phy of the West ern Tethys with in ferred sauropod mi gra tion routes

Palaeo ge ogra phy af ter Golonka, 2004 (sim pli fied, mod i fied)

palaeo bio logi cal and palaeobiogeographical ques tions of theearly evo lu tion of these an i mals.

Thus we are pleased to an nounce the dis cov ery of the di no -saur foot prints cf. Parabrontopodus isp. Lockley, Farlow etMeyer, 1994, at trib uted to sauro pods in Hettangian (ear li est Ju -ras sic) al lu vial de pos its at Anina (Colonia Cehă Quarry andReşiţa Ba sin), in the South ern Carpathians of West ern Ro ma -nia. To date, no Ju ras sic di no saur foot prints have been found inRo ma nia. Re ports of Cre ta ceous di no saur foot prints were pub -lished by Vremir and Codrea (2002) from Maastrichtian con ti -nen tal beds of the Sebeş area (Transylvanian De pres sion),while ear lier Cre ta ceous foot prints of un known af fin ity werede scribed by Koch (1900) from Neocomian beds of Lăpuş(Maramureş area). Di no saur bones (Benton et al., 1997) werede scribed from Early Cre ta ceous (Berriasian) beds of theBrusturi-Cor net area, north west ern Ro ma nia, while bones andeggs (Grigorescu, 2005; Grigorescu and Csiki, 2008) were de -scribed from Up per Cre ta ceous (Maastrichtian) beds of theHaţeg Ba sin (Transylvania). The small size of these di no saurre mains from the Haţeg Ba sin points to an in su lar dwarf ism ofthese an i mals (Grigorescu, 2005; Grigorescu and Csiki, 2008),as well as for those of the Brusturi-Cor net area (Benton et al.,2006). Our new ev i dence, how ever, shows nor mal-sized sauro -pods and hence no signs of dwarf ism.

GEOLOGICAL SETTING

Anina (South ern Carpathians, West ern Ro ma nia), for merly known as Steierdorf, was an im por tant coal min ing lo cal ity inthe South Carpathians, oc cur ring in the cen tral area of theReşiţa Ba sin, Getic Nappe, and 35 km south of Reşiţa (Fig. 1).This area has been in ten sively mined since 1792 for Lower Ju -ras sic coals, and later for re frac tory clays and bi tu mi nousshales, all of these ac tiv i ties be ing al most to tally halted to day.The min ing was un der taken through ver ti cal shafts, ex ten siveand in tri cate un der ground works, and large open-cast mines,such as the Ponor, Colonia Cehă and Hildegard quar ries (Popa,2009). The Colonia Cehă Quarry is an im por tant open-castmine in the area, next to the Steierdorf old neigh bor hood ofAnina, and was opened for the ex trac tion of bi tu mi nous shalesin the early 1980s. The di no saur tracks cf. Parabrontopodusisp. Lockley, Farlow et Meyer, 1994 de scribed in this pa perwere re corded from its east ern and north ern flanks, alongsteeply in clined bed ding sur faces, ex posed in the up per mostlev els of the quarry and cut by trans verse faults (Figs. 2 and 3).

The Getic Nappe (Murgoci, 1905) rep re sents one of the main struc tural units of the South Carpathians in Ro ma nia, a nappeyield ing both a crys tal line base ment and a sed i men tary cover.The Getic Nappe oc curs be tween the Supragetic Nappe (west -wards) and the Severin and Danubian units (eastwards), as partsof a nappe pile overthrust from west to wards east in the SouthCarpathians. The Reşiţa Ba sin, also known as theReşiţa–Moldova Nouă Sed i men tary Zone, rep re sents the larg estsed i men tary ba sin of the Getic Nappe, oc cur ring in the SouthCarpathians, be tween Reşiţa and the Dan ube River (Fig. 1). This ba sin in cludes de pos its be long ing to Palaeozoic (Up per Car bon -if er ous–Lower Perm ian) and Me so zoic (Lower Ju ras sic–Lower

Cre ta ceous) strata, un con form ably over ly ing the crys tal linebase ment of the Getic Nappe. Dur ing Early Ju ras sic times, theReşiţa Ba sin with the de pos its of the whole Getic Nappe be -longed to a large Moesian–Rhodope Plat form, and ac cord ing topalaeo geo graphi cal maps (Scotese, 2002; Golonka, 2004;Golonka et al., 2005; Blackley, 2009), de vel oped on a shelf areawith is lands and pen in su las, in clud ing an emer gent “Moesian Is -land”, at lat i tudes of about 30 de grees N (Fig. 1).

The Me so zoic sed i men tary suc ces sion be gins with the con -ti nen tal Steierdorf For ma tion (Bucur, 1991, 1997; Popa andKędzior, 2008; Fig. 2), un con form ably over ly ing the crys tal -line base ment or the Up per Palaeozoic strata, and be ing con -form ably over lain by the brack ish-ma rine Uteriş For ma tion(Pliensbachian–mid dle Toarcian). The whole Steierdorf For -ma tion is 250 m thick in the north, and it de creases to 50–60 msouth wards, reach ing about 150–160 m in thick ness in the areaof the Colonia Cehă Quarry. The age of the Steierdorf For ma -tion is Hettangian–Sinemurian (Bucur, 1991, 1997; Popa,2000a, b, 2009; Popa and Kędzior, 2008). How ever, be cause of a lack of di ag nos tic fos sils in its lower part, the low er most partof the Steierdorf For ma tion (Dealul Budinic Mem ber, at leastin its lower part) may be older (?Up per Tri as sic/Rhaetian). Atthe top of the Dealul Budinic Mem ber, a pyroclastic layer oc -curs, in di cat ing a vol ca nic event. Above this layer, con ven tion -ally ac cepted as the bound ary marker be tween the DealulBudinic Mem ber and suc ceed ing Valea Tereziei Mem ber, thecol our of sed i ment changes into grey. Fur ther more, some 10 mabove (Fig. 2), the first coal seams ap pear, point ing to a sig nif i -cant cli ma tic change.

The sauropod tracks oc cur just above the pyroclastic levelmark ing the bot tom of the Valea Tereziei Mem ber, at the top ofa fine-grained sand stone (Figs. 2 and 3). The Valea TerezieiMem ber is late Hettangian–Sinemurian. In the Colonia CehăQuarry, the low er most part of the Valea Tereziei Mem ber (in -clud ing the foot print-bear ing ho ri zon) may be mid dleHettangian, be cause this part still lacks age-di ag nos tic fos sils;the in dex flo ral re mains ap pear some 10 metres above, in thecoal-bear ing strata. The Valea Tereziei Mem ber (ex cept for itslow er most 10 m) is the main coal-bear ing unit of the SteierdorfFor ma tion, con tain ing black, car bo na ceous sand stones, mud -stones, and clays of var i ous types, with abun dant fos sil plantsin di cat ing a up per Hettangian (a range zone with Thaumato -pteris brauniana) to Sinemurian age (an acmezone withNilssonia cf. orientalis) — Popa (1997, 2000a, b, c, 2005,2009); Popa and Van Konijnenbrug-Van Cittert (2006), Popaand Kędzior (2006). The ex cep tional fos sil con tent in di catesAnina as a fos sil Lagerstatte lo cal ity, both for di ver sity and forde gree of pres er va tion (Andrae, 1855). The clos est com pa ra ble flo ras to those of the Ro ma nian Early Ju ras sic flo ras be long ingto the Reşiţa, Sirinia, or other bas ins in the South Carpathiansare the co eval as sem blages of Iran and Af ghan i stan, which arealso the clos est flo ras palaeogeographically (Givulescu, 1998;Popa, 1998, 2000a). The Valea Tereziei Mem ber con tains 8main bi tu mi nous coal seams and a char ac ter is tic re frac tory clay bed and shows a con stant strati graphic po si tion and a wide lat -eral de vel op ment in the cen tral part of the Reşiţa Ba sin, thusserv ing as a valu able strati graphic marker for theHettangian-Sinemurian bound ary (Fig. 2). The re frac tory claybears a rich pol len and spore as sem blage (Antonescu, 1973),

Early Jurassic sauropod footprints of the Southern Carpathians, Romania: palaeobiological and palaeogeographical significance 463


Fig. 2. Geo log i cal/sedimentological pro files of the flu vial Steierdorf For ma tion with po si tion of sauropod foot prints shown

and marks a tem po rary but wide spread lac us trine sed i men ta -tion ep i sode within a gen er ally flu vial/al lu vial plain-swamp en -vi ron ment. Be sides rich plant fos sils with pre served or gans, in -ver te brate trace fos sils as well as ver te brate tracks(Batrachopus cf. deweyi) have been found in the ValeaTereziei Mem ber (Popa, 2000a, c, 2009).

SEDIMENTOLOGICAL BACKGROUNDOF THE STEIERDORF FORMATION

(HETTANGIAN–SINEMURIAN)

The lower part of the Dealul Budinic Mem ber rests on anero sional sur face, over ly ing ei ther ?Perm ian redbeds or crys tal -line base ment. It is mainly com posed of poorly sorted, ma -trix-sup ported con glom er ates and coarse-grained sand stones(Fig. 2). Peb bles (as much as 5 cm in di am e ter) are an gu lar tosub-an gu lar and are scat tered through out sand stone lay ers.Coarse-grained units are usu ally structureless, and in someplaces show large-scale cross strat i fi ca tion. Oc ca sion ally, up -per sur faces of sand stone bod ies have po lyg o nal struc tureswith sec ond ary fer ric ox ide crusts, in dic a tive of des ic ca tion.Fine-grained de pos its are sub or di nate, and are rep re sented byhor i zon tally lam i nated, red dish mudstones. Ad di tion ally, afire clay ho ri zon within this se quence has been found. Thesefea tures in di cate high vis cos ity flow, typ i cal of al lu vial fans.The age of the basal se quence of the Dealul Budinic Mem bercan not be pre cisely iden ti fied, due to the lack of fos sils, so itmay be ei ther of Late Tri as sic (Rhaetian) or ear li est Ju ras sic(Hettangian) age. The up per part of the mem ber shows a tran si -tion to a more sta ble, lower-en ergy sed i men tary re gime. Thede pos its be come finer, the first drifted flo ral re mains oc cur, and palaeosol ho ri zons ap pear. As the en ergy of de po si tion de -creased, al lu vial fans changed into an al lu vial plain en vi ron -ment. In the up per most, still red dish part of this mem ber, ver te -

brate bur rows have been found (Popa and Kędzior, 2006). Justabove these bur rows the pyroclastic level oc curs, mark ing thebound ary be tween the two mem bers.

The Valea Tereziei Mem ber is com posed mainly of sand -stones, with a few con glom er atic lay ers and sub or di natemudstones, claystones and coal seams. Flo ral re mains are veryrich and well-pre served, ex cept in the low er most part of themem ber. Sand stone bod ies are char ac ter ized by large-scaletrough cross-bed ding and part ing lineations, point ing to a highen ergy of river flow. Rip ple lami na tions oc cur at the top ofsome sand stone lay ers. Sand stone lay ers oc cur ring withinfine-grained de pos its (at trib uted to cre vasse-splay de pos its)show hor i zon tal or rip ple-drift lami na tions and are stronglybioturbated by roots. Drifted logs are abun dant and ori entedpar al lel to the bed ding. Tree roots and trunks in ver ti cal, life po -si tion have also been found. Sand stone bod ies showchannelized ge om e tries; they of ten pinch out lat er ally af tershort dis tances (~15 m). Traces of for est fires (fre quent char -coal frag ments) are also pres ent, and the so called “burntcoal-seam” forms a lo cal cor re la tive ho ri zon. These fea turespoint to a hu mid al lu vial plain en vi ron ment, with al ter nat ingflu vial and lac us trine/swamp sed i men ta tion. Hu mid cli matecon di tions dur ing the de po si tion of the Valea Tereziei Mem berare also in di cated by the flo ral re mains (Popa, 1997, 2000a, b,c, 2005, 2009; Popa and Van Konijnenbrug-Van Cittert, 2006;Popa and Kędzior, 2006). It should be noted, how ever, that theColonia Ceh² Quarry is af fected by a dense net work of faults,thus dif fer ent parts of the pro file, in volv ing both the up per mostDealul Budinic and the low er most Valea Tereziei mem bers,oc cur in lat eral con tact with each other (Fig. 3).

The sauropod foot prints, which oc cur at the top of the firstsand stone layer of the Valea Tereziei Mem ber, are cov ered by a grey mudstone con tain ing plant roots in its top most part. Thesauropod tracks were prob a bly left on the top of a wide spreadcre vasse-splay/cre vasse-delta layer.


Fig. 3. Front and lat eral view of the track-bear ing layer at the Colonia Ceh² Quarry

Note trans verse faults ex pos ing dif fer ent strati graphic lev els; v.b. — ver te brate bur rows of the up per most Dealul Budinic Mem ber (Popa and Kędzior,2006); s.t. — sauropod tracks shown on Fig ure 4; s.tw. — sauropod trackway shown on Fig ure 5 — the sur face is densely tram pled by sauro pods

SYSTEMATIC DESCRIPTION OF THE DINOSAUR FOOTPRINTS

cf. Parabrontopodus isp. Lockley, Farlow et Meyer, 1994(Figs. 4, 5)

(type ichnosp. Parabrontopodus mcintoshi Lockley, Farlow et Meyer, 1994)

M a t e r i a l. — Two plas ter casts LPB III ICH 76(pes-manus set) and LCB III ICH 77 (two-steps trackway) oforig i nal sur faces in the Colonia Cehă Quarry (Fig. 3), reposited at the Uni ver sity of Bu cha rest, Fac ulty of Ge ol ogy and Geo -phys ics, Lab o ra tory of Palae on tol ogy, 1, N. Balcescu Ave.,010041, Bu cha rest, Ro ma nia.

D e s c r i p t i o n. — LPB III ICH 76 — pes-manus sets(Fig. 4) and LCB III ICH 77 (Fig. 5) — a short, nar row-gaugesauropod trackway. Pes and manus foot print of small size, pesca. 40 cm long, 25 cm wide, manus ca. 15 cm wide and 10 cmlong. Pes is oval, strongly nar rowed in its pos te rior (heel) part.Manus oval (Fig. 4) or star-like, pentadactyl (Fig. 5). Pro -nounced heteropody, manus/pes area ra tio 1:5 or less. Pes im -prints show out wardly ro tated claw (or ungual) im pres sionscor re spond ing to digit I, II, III and IV. Digit I is ro bust, greaterthan the other dig its. Lead ing mar gin of the pes print (the me -dial side of the pes) is deeper that the trail ing (lat eral) mar gin ofthe pes. Heel pad is dis tinctly im pressed. All the tracks are sur -rounded by dis place ment rims.

The trackway (Fig. 5) is nar row-gauged, and shows marked heteropody. Both pes and manus are ro tated out wardly, the sec -ond pes-manus spac ing is shorter. Foot prints are deeply im -pressed, the first pes is sur rounded by a high dis place ment rim,the sec ond one was filled by upwelling, sat u rated sed i ment.The first pes is 32 cm long, the sec ond one lacks a clear heelpad be cause of oblit er a tion caused by sed i ment upwelling. Thefirst manus is pre served as an undertrack (up per part of thesand stone layer is miss ing); sec ond manus well pre served andmore or less pentadactyl in shape. The in ferred midline of thetrackway is curved, per haps due to pro gres sion on an un sta blesur face. The pes stride length for the step is ca. 80 cm, mea -sured be tween the mid dle points of two pedal im prints and thepes di ver gence an gle, rel a tive to the in ferred midline, is ir reg u -lar, from 0° (pos te rior pes) to 38° (an te rior pes).

D i s c u s s i o n. — The track-bear ing sand stone sur faceat the base of the Valea Tereziei Mem ber is densely tram pledby sauro pods, which makes indentification of in di vid ual tracksand trackways dif fi cult. How ever, in two places (Fig. 3) the last gen er a tion of tracks al low one to rec og nize two prob a blepes-manus sets in ferred to rep re sent a nar row-gauge trackway(Figs. 4 and 5). Par tic u larly, one pes foot print with digit im -prints is di ag nos tic (Fig. 4, where pes-manus set no. 2 is in themid dle). The pro nounced heteropody may also be di ag nos tic of Parabrontopodus isp. Lockley, Farlow et Meyer, 1994 — hereten ta tively la belled cf. Parabrontopodus. The best pre servedpes no. 2 (Fig. 4) shows other char ac ter is tic fea tures. A ro bustdigit I is typ i cal of the Eusauropoda, which can also point to alarge first ungual (Wil son and Sereno, 1998). More over, Wil -son and Sereno (1998) men tioned that the assymetrical ro bust -

ness of pedal dig its must be re lated to the un equal weight dis tri -bu tion across the sub-plantigigrade pes in Eusauropoda. In -deed, in the LPB III ICH 76 spec i men (Fig. 4), digit I is thedom i nant digit of the pes and the me dial (in ner) side of the pesis deeper, while the heel pad is sub stan tial. These fea tures arealso ob served in trackways pro duced by eusauropods (Pittmanand Gilette, 1989) and may re flect how a greater load was car -ried by the in ner dig its of the pes of these sauro pods. The sig -nif i cance of these fea tures is that the col lapse from digitigradeto a sub-plantigigrade (or gravipodal) pos ture was an im por tant turn over in the evo lu tion of sauro pods as the Eusauropodaevolved from basal Sauropoda in the Early Ju ras sic times (Wil -son and Sereno, 1998). Early and mid dle Hettangian sauropodfoot prints from Po land (Gierliński, 1997; Gierliński andSawicki, 1998; Gierliński and Pieńkowski, 1999; Gierliński etal., 2004; Pieńkowski, 2004) show sub stan tial heel pad andcon spic u ous traces of pes digit I. There is also a dif fer ence indepth be tween the deeper me dial and shal lower lat eral parts ofpedal im prints in sev eral tracks. Such a dif fer ence is not clear in the pho to graphs of sauropod tracks from It aly, where pes prints sug gest rather sym met ri cal dis tri bu tions of pres sure (Leonardiand Lanzinger, 1992; Leonardi and Avanzini, 1994; DallaVecchia, 1994; Avanzini and Petti, 2008; Avanzini et al.,2008). The Ro ma nian foot prints are sim i lar in age to the Ital ianones (mid dle–late Hettangian) and are some what youn ger thanmost of those from Po land. Ro ma nian finds sug gest that asub-plantigrade (gravipodal) pos ture of sauro pods de vel opedprob a bly by mid dle Hettangian times.

The nar row-gauge trackway (LCB III ICH 77, Fig. 5) isshort, in ferred to be com posed of only two manus-pes sets, andwas left in soft, sat u rated sed i ment, as shown by deeply-im -pressed tracks, high sed i ment-dis place ment rims, and in one case in fill ing of the track with sat u rated sed i ment. Be cause of the ir -reg u lar step, one might in fer a chang ing pes di ver gence an gle,and the bent midline of the short trackway. How ever, pre cisemea sure ments of trackway pa ram e ters could not be taken. Ir reg -u lar ity of the trackway may per haps point to an ir reg u lar pro -gres sion of the trace pro ducer, caused by a soft, un sta ble sub -strate. The track-bear ing layer could be fur ther dis torted by earlydiagenesis. The first or prox i mal pes is very deeply im pressed,and the cor re spond ing manus is rep re sented by an undertrack asthe up per part of the sand stone layer is miss ing in this part of thetrackway. The next pes is in com plete (due to sed i mentupwelling), whereas the sec ond manus is well pre served and hasre tained a pentadactyl shape with im pres sion of dig its. Digit im -prints in sauropod manus tracks are rarely pre served (Lockley etal., 1994a), al though noted from sev eral lo cal i ties (Lockley etal., 1992; Santos et al., 1994; Leonardi and Avanzini, 1994;Gierliński and Sawicki, 1998; Avanzini and Petti, 2008;Avanzini et al., 2008; Santos et al., 2009). Gierliński andSawicki (1998) and Gierliński and Pieńkowski (1999) il lus trated early Hettangian sauropod trackways of both adult and ju ve nilesauro pods, and in the adult sauropod trackways, some of themanus im prints were clearly pentadactyl. The manus de scribedherein bears re sem blance also to the Late Tri as sic Eosauropusisp. (Lockley et al., 2006), pro duced by mem bers of theSauropodomorpha (Hunt and Lucas, 2007). Dalla Vecchia(1999) and Dalla Vecchia and Tarlao (2000) sug gested threesauropod manus morphotypes based on the con fig u ra tion of


digit I — the manus de scribed herein ismost sim i lar to their Morphotype A,which com prises manus prints with awell-de vel oped im pres sion of digit I (see also Lockley et al., 1992, their fig. 2:print 3). As sum ing a soft and sat u ratedsub strate, such pres er va tion might sug -gest that man ual dig its of early sauro -pods might oc ca sion ally sep a rate or besplayed, per haps pro vid ing better sup -port on un sta ble ter rain. Sev eral au thorsbe lieve the sauropod manus prob a blyfunc tioned as a sin gle, rigid, block-likestruc ture with no intermetacarpal move -ments (McIntosh, 1990; Upchurch,1994; Bonnan, 2003), but the non-tu bu -lar, prim i tive manus of ear li est sauro -pods might have func tioned in a dif fer -ent way.

The ma te rial is con sis tent in termsof shape and size with known Hettan -gian Parabrontopodus isp. trackwaysre ported from North ern It aly (Leonardiand Lanzinger, 1992; Dalla Vecchia,1994; Avanzini and Petti, 2008;Avanzini et al., 2008) and Cen tral Po -land (Gierliński, 1997; Gierliński andSawicki, 1998; Gierliński and Pień -kowski, 1999). Re cently, Santos et al.(2009) dis cussed Sauropodomorphaichno- morphotypes — most of the fea -tures of our ma te rial (nar row-gaugetrackway, pes shape and its out wardlydi rected claw marks, high heteropody)fits the Parabrontopodus- like morpho -type. Fur ther more, the sin gle penta -dactyl manus im print would rather fittheir new Polyonyx-like morphotype(Santos et al., 2009).

PALAEOGEOGRAPHIC IMPLICATIONS

The palaeoclimatic and palaeogeographic in ter pre ta tion isbased largely on the rich Early Ju ras sic (Hettan -gian–Sinemurian) flora found in the coal-bear ing ValeaTereziei Mem ber. Givulescu (1998) re ferred the flo ral as sem -blage to var i ous co eval en vi ron ments of Iran and Af ghan i stan(north ern Tethyan rim). This au thor also sug gested that thepalaeovegetation in Anina oc curred along sea shores andbeaches, al though gen er at ing coals in pure limnic, fresh wa tercon di tions. Semaka (1962) and Givulescu (1998) em pha sizedthe paralic fea tures of the Steierdorf For ma tions, fol low ing pre -vi ous geo log i cal works (Răileanu et al., 1957) de scrib ing thecoal mea sures of the Steierdorf For ma tion as Gresten-type de -pos its. How ever, any fea tures sup port ing sea shore prox im itywere not dem on strated by the au thors. The first un equiv o calma rine in flu ences in the Me so zoic of the Reşiţa Ba sin oc cur inthe Uteriş For ma tion (Pliensbachian–Mid dle Toarcian in ter val

— Bucur, 1991, 1997; Popa, 2000a, 2009). There fore, an in ter -pre ta tion of a con ti nen tal intramontane (limnic) ba sin was pro -posed by Popa (2000a) and Popa and Kędzior (2008). Ac cord -ing to these au thors, dur ing Hettangian times, the bas ins of theGetic Nappe (Reşiţa) and of the Danubian Units (Sirina,Presacina and Cerna-Jiu) were con ti nen tal, closely re lated toeach other at a short dis tance.

Popa (1997, 1998), Popa and Van Konijnenburg-Van Cittert(2006) and Givulescu (1998) in di cated that the flora of Aninabe longs to the Eurosinian Re gion, Eu ro pean Prov ince sensuVakhrameev (1991). Popa and Van Konijnenburg-Van Cittert(2006) in ter preted the palaeolatitude of the Reşiţa Ba sin as be -tween 20° and 30° north. Mateescu (1958) re corded sec ond aryxy lem tis sues with pseudo-an nual growth rings in fusains fromRudăria, in the Sirinia Ba sin, Danubian Unit, a neigh bor ba sin ofthe Reşiţa Ba sin in the Hettangian, cit ing sim i lar fea tures inwood tis sues from Anina, Doman (Reşiţa Ba sin) and from theVul can-Codlea area (Holbav Ba sin). These rings in di cate mon -soonal con di tions at this time, an ap pro pri ate model for thenorth ern frame of the Tethys realm. Such pseudo -an nual growth


Fig. 4. Iso lated sauropod tracks (last track gen er a tion on the heavily tram pled sur face), deeperparts of the foot prints shad owed: note the pes-manus set (p2–m2), pes with four dig its im -printed, and prom i nent digit I; me dial (in ner) part of the pes is sig nif i cantly deeper, as in all pestracks on the sur face, and were pro duced by dif fer ent sauropod in di vid u als

rings were also re corded in permineralized co ni fers fromHolbav, Holbav Ba sin, part of the Getic Nappe, in di cat ing a sim -i lar cli mate. Popa (1998, 2000a) con cluded that the Early Ju ras -sic flora of the Reşiţa Ba sin oc curred on the north ern frame ofthe Tethys realm, within a typ i cal limnic intramontane de pres -sion, with out paralic in flu ences, whereas paralic in flu ences were stron ger in the bas ins of the Danubian Units.

The sauropod tracks come from the low er most 10 m of theValea Tereziei Mem ber. This part of the sec tion does not con -tain coal seams, thus, the cli ma tic con di tions of Ro ma niansauro pods could have been some what drier than the con di tionspre vail ing dur ing de po si tion of the main coal mea sures in theReşiţa Ba sin. Likely, it could have been a warm and hu mid sub -trop i cal (mon soonal) cli mate, per haps with a drier sea son.

Al though rel a tively few un equiv o cal nar row-gauge sauro -pods trackways are re corded from Early Ju ras sic strata world -wide (Hettangian: Leonardi and Lanzinger, 1992; DallaVecchia, 1994; Gierliński, 1997; Gierliński and Sawicki, 1998;Gierliński and Pieńkowski, 1999; Avanzini and Petti, 2008;Avanzini et al., 2008, and Pliensbachian strata of Marocco:Ishigaki, 1989; Farlow, 1992; see also Lockley et al., 1994b), itis clear that sauro pods roamed this re gion, in both the Pangaean(Af ri can, Eur asian) main land and sup posed is land/pen in sula ar -eas within the west ern/north ern Tethys do main (Fig. 1). The

palaeogeographic re con struc tions of Blackley (2009), Golonka(2004) and Golonka et al. (2005) show that the area which isnow the Ro ma nian Carpathians in cluded large is lands, em brac -ing both Hun gar ian and Ro ma nian coal-bear ing for ma tions(Fig. 1). The palaeogeographic map of Scotese (2002) shows arather pen in su lar area, but this map is much more gen er al ized.As men tioned above, in the Early Ju ras sic, the Getic Unit wouldbe long, to gether with the Danubian Units, to the larger MoesianPlat form, in clud ing the “Moesian Is land” of Golonka (2004).Such an is land could pro vide a hab i tat for lush sub trop i cal plantsand an i mals, but this hy po thet i cal is land must have been at leasttem po rarily con nected to main land Pangaea to al low mi gra tionof sauro pods. Mi gra tion routes of sauro pods would cross thewest ern and north ern frames of West ern Tethys, in clud ing Af -rica and Eur asia (Fig. 1). More over, the size of the sauropod cf.Parabrontopodus isp. foot prints from Ro ma nia is typ i cal ofEarly Ju ras sic sauro pods and does not dif fer from those from Po -land (main land Pangaea — Eur asia) and It aly (Tethyan car bon -ate plat form/sea shore). Thus, the size of the Ro ma nian foot -prints would speak against in su lar dwarf ism, with the lat ter con -di tion ex pected in the case of long-last ing is land con di tions. This is con trary to the finds of Maastrichtian di no saurs of the “HaţegIs land” in Ro ma nia, where di no saur bone re mains clearly in di -cate in su lar dwarf ism (Bojar et al., 2005; Csiki and Grigorescu,


Fig. 5. Short, one-step (two manus-pes sets) trackway with in ferred midline, dis torted in the soft, sat u rated sed i ment

Note bent midline, chang ing stride and di ver gence an gle (prob a bly re sult ing from pro gres sion on an un sta ble sur face) and deeplyim pressed foot prints with high sed i ment dis place ment rims; pentadactyl manus of the sec ond set (m2) shown in the in sert photo

2008). Pol ish and Ro ma nian Early Ju ras sic sauropod foot printscome from a con ti nen tal al lu vial en vi ron ment, whereas Ital ianand Mo roc can ones come from car bon ate tidal flat fa cies. Thissug gests a wide spec trum of en vi ron ments roamed by earlysauro pods and a great mo bil ity of these an i mals. As sum ing thismo bil ity and the var ied en vi ron ments, one can sup pose that theab sence of sauro pods from North Amer ica in the ear li est Ju ras sic times was rather caused by a per ma nent ob sta cle (rift) be tweenthis part and other parts (Af rica, Eur asia) of the frag ment ingPangaean land mass.

CONCLUSIONS

Early Ju ras sic cf. Parabrontopodus isp. tracks and an in -ferred nar row-gauge trackway de scribed herein rep re sent thefirst Ju ras sic di no saur foot prints de scribed in Ro ma nia. Ro ma -nian foot prints are of sim i lar age to Ital ian sauropod tracks(mid dle to up per Hettangian) and they are some what youn gerthan the early to mid dle Hettangian tracks from Po land. Asy -metrically im pressed pes prints with sub stan tial heel pads in di -cate that a greater load was car ried by the in ner dig its of the pesof sauro pods dur ing walk ing. This points to a sub-plantigrade(gravipodal) pos ture of the trace maker, and sug gests that sucha pos ture of sauro pods (Eusauropoda) de vel oped from digiti -grade to a sub-plantigrade by the mid Hettangian. The penta -dactyl manus may in di cate that the manus dig its were oc ca sion -ally func tional in Eusauropoda, per haps pro vid ing a better sup -

port when walk ing on un sta ble, sticky ground. In the ear li estJu ras sic, the “Moesian Is land” was at least tem po rarily at tached to the Pangaean (Eur asian) main land. More over, the nor malsizes (for Hettangian times) of the Ro ma nian sauropod foot -prints speak against in su lar dwarf ism of these an i mals. Basedon our find and on those of other sauropod tracks in the re gion,sauro pods roamed both the north ern and the south ern rim ofWest ern Tethys. This wide palaeogeographic and palaeo -environmental dis tri bu tion of sauropod foot prints in di cates that the ab sence of sauropod foot prints ob served in Early Ju ras sicstrata of North Amer ica was per haps caused by an geo graph ical ob sta cle (rift), rather than by cli ma tic fac tors.

Lastly, we ex pect that this find of di no saur foot prints cancon trib ute to the de vel op ment of geotourism and to the lo calecon omy in this part of Ro ma nia. Per spec tives of geotourism de -pend on fu ture sci en tific re search on di no saur tracks and on other fos sils such as plant and in ver te brate re mains in the re gion.

Ac knowl edge ments. The au thors wish to thank Prof. M.Sandulescu, Prof. T. Neagu and Dr. Z. Csiki, Uni ver sity of Bu -cha rest, for use ful dis cus sions and com ments. This pa per wassup ported by the CNCSIS (NURC) grant no. 436/1.10.2007(978) to one of the au thors (MEP). We ex press our thanks to A.Mar tin and M. Lockley for their most help ful re views and valu -able com ments. This is a con tri bu tion to the IGCP pro ject 506“Ma rine and Non-ma rine Ju ras sic: Global Cor re la tion and Ma -jor Geo log i cal Events”.

REFERENCES

ANDRAE C. (1855) — Beitrage zur kenntniss der fossilen Flora Sieben -burgens und des Banates. Abhandlungen der K. K. geologischenReichsanstalt, 3 (4): 1–48.

ANTONESCU E. (1973) — Quelques donnees sur la palynologie du Liassous fa cies de Gresten de Roumanie. 3rd In ter na tional PalynologicalCon fer ence, Mos cow: 13–17.

AVANZINI M., FRANCESCHI M., PETTI F. M., GIRARDI S.,FERRETTI P. and TOMASONI R. (2008) — New Early Ju ras sic(Hettangian–Sinemurian) sauropodomorph track from the Trento car -bon ate Plat form (South ern Alps, North ern It aly). Studi Trent. Sc. Nat., Acta Geol., 83: 317–322.

AVANZINI M. and PETTI F. M. (2008) — Up dat ing the di no saurtracksites from the Lower Ju ras sic Calcari Grigi Group (South ernAlps, North ern It aly). Studi Trent. Sc. Nat., Acta Geol., 83: 289–301.

BENTON M., COOK E., GRIGORESCU D. and TALLODI E. (1997) —Di no saurs and other tetra pods in an Early Cre ta ceous baux ite-filledfis sure, north west ern Ro ma nia. Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimat.,Palaeoecol., 130: 275–292.

BENTON M., MINTER N. J. and POSMOŞANU E. (2006) — Dwarf ismin ornithopod di no saurs from the Early Cre ta ceous of Ro ma nia. In:Trib utes to the Ca reer of Prof. Dan Grigorescu (ed. Z. Csiki): 79–87.Ars Docendi, Bu cha rest.

BLACKLEY R. C. (2009) — Global palaeo ge ogra phy.http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/rcb7/

BOJAR A.-V., GRIGORESCU D., OTTNER F. and CSIKI Z. (2005) —Palaeoenvironmental in ter pre ta tion of di no saur- and mam mal-bear ing con ti nen tal Maastrichtian de pos its, Haţeg ba sin, Ro ma nia. Geol.Quart., 49 (2): 205–222.

BONNAN M. F. (2003) — The evo lu tion of manus shape in sauropod di no -saurs: im pli ca tions for func tional mor phol ogy, forelimb ori en ta tionand phy log eny. J Verte. Paleont., 23: 595–613.

BUCUR I. I. (1991) — Prop o si tion pour une no men cla ture formelle des de -pots paleozoiques et mesozoiques de la zone de Reşiţa-Moldova Nouă(Carpathes Meridionales, Roumanie). Stud. Univ. Babeş-Bolyai.Geologie, 36 (2): 3–14.

BUCUR I. I. (1997) — Formaţiunile mesozoice din zona Reşiţa-MoldovaNouă. Cluj-Napoca.

COOPER M. R. (1984) — Re as sess ment of Vulcanodon karibaensis Raath(Dinosauria: Saurischia) and the or i gin of the Sauropoda. Palaeontol.Africana, 25: 203–231.

CRUICKSHANK A. R. I. (1975) — Or i gin of sauropod di no saurs. SouthAf ri can J. Sc., 71: 89–90.

CSIKI Z. and GRIGORESCU D. (2008) — The “Di no saur Is land” — newin ter pre ta tion of the Haţeg Ba sin af ter 110 years. Sargetia, 20: 5–26.

DALLA VECCHIA F. M. (1994) — Ju ras sic and Cre ta ceous sauropod ev i -dence in the Me so zoic car bon ate plat forms of the South ern Alps andDinarids. Gaia, 10: 65–73.

DALLA VECCHIA F. M. (1999) — A sauropod foot print in a lime stoneblock from the Lower Cre ta ceous of north east ern It aly. Ichnos, 6:269–275.

DALLA VECCHIA F. M. and TARLAO A. (2000) — New Di no saur tracksites in the Albian (Early Cre ta ceous) of the Istrian pen in sula(Croatia). Parte II — Pa le on tol ogy. Mem. Sc. Geol., 52: 227–292.

DONG Z. (1992) — Dino saur ian Fau nas of China. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

DONG Z., ZHOU S. and ZHANG Y. (1983) — The dino saur ian re mainsfrom Sichuan Ba sin, China. Palaeontol. Sinica, 162 C(23): 1–145.


FARLOW J. O. (1992) — Sauropod tracks and trackmakers: in te grat ingthe ichnological and skel e tal re cords. Zubia, 10: 89–138.

GIERLIŃSKI G. (1997) — Sauropod tracks in the Early Ju ras sic of Po -land. Acta Palaeont. Pol., 42 (4): 533–538.

GIERLIŃSKI G. and PIEŃKOWSKI G. (1999) — Di no saur track as sem -blages from Hettangian of Po land. Geol. Quart., 43 (3): 329–346.

GIERLIŃSKI G., PIEŃKOWSKI G. and NIEDZWIEDZKI G. (2004) —Tetrapod track as sem blage in the Hettangian of Sołtyków, Po land, andits Paleoenvironmental Back ground. Ichnos, 11 (3–4), Wil liam A. S.Sarjeant (1935–2002) A Cel e bra tion of His Life and IchnologicalCon tri bu tion. Spec. Is sue: Part 3, 195–213.

GIERLIŃSKI G. and SAWICKI G. (1998) — New sauropod tracks fromthe Lower Ju ras sic of Po land. Geol. Quart., 42 (4): 477–480.

GIVULESCU R. (1998) — Flora fosilă a Jurasicului in fe rior de la Anina.Editura Academiei Române, Bucureşti.

GOLONKA J. (2004) — Plate tec tonic evo lu tion of the south ern mar gin ofKurasia in the Me so zoic and Ce no zoic. Tectonophysics, 381: 235–273.

GOLONKA J., KROBICKI M. and TOMAŚ A. (2005) — PaleogeografiaKarpat centralnych i wewnętrznych — ujęcie rotacyjne. In: Wapienieorganiczne i organodetrytyczne w Karpatach Zewnętrznych i ichznaczenie dla rekonstrukcji paleogeograficznych (eds. M. Cieszkowski, J. Golonka): 41–45. Seminarium naukowe, Kraków, 21.04.2005.

GRIGORESCU D. (2005) — Re dis cov ery of a “for got ten land”. The lastthree de cades of re search on the di no saur-bear ing de pos its from theHaţeg Ba sin. Acta Palaeont. Romaniae, 5: 191–204.

GRIGORESCU D. and CSIKI Z. (2008) — A new site with megaloolithidegg re mains in the Maastrichtian of the Hateg Ba sin. Acta Palaeont.Romaniae, 6: 115–121.

HUNT A. P. and LUCAS S. G. (2007) — Late Tri as sic tetrapod tracks ofwest ern North Amer ica. In: Tri as sic of the Amer i can West (eds. S. G.Lucas and J. A. Spielmann). New Mex ico Mus. Natur. His tory Sc.Bull., 40: 215–230.

HUNT A. P., LOCKLEY M. G., LUCAS S. G. and MEYER C. A. (1994)— The global sauropod fos sil re cord. Gaia, 10: 261–279.

ISHIGAKI S. (1989) — Foot prints of swim ming sauro pods from Mo -rocco. In: Di no saur Tracks and Traces (eds. D. D. Gilette and M. G.Lockley): 83–86. Cam bridge Univ. Press. Cam bridge.

JAIN S. L., KUTTY T. S., ROYCHOWDHURY T. and CHATTERJEE S.(1979) — Some chararacteristics of Barapasaurus tagorei, a sauropoddi no saur from the Lower Ju ras sic of Deccan In dia. Procced. 4 In ter na -tional. Gond wana Symp., Cal cutta, 1: 204–216.

KOCH A. (1900) — Systematische Ubersicht der fossilien Wilbertierresteder Lander der Ungarischen Krone. Mag yar Orv. Es Term-Visg.Vandorgy Munkatalai, 30: 526–566.

LEONARDI G. and AVANZINI M. (1994) — Dinosauri in Italia. In: Iltempo dei dinosauri (ed. G. Ligaube). Le Scienze Quaderni, 76: 69–81.

LEONARDI G. and LANZINGER M. (1992) — Dinosauri nel Trentino:venticinque piste fossili nel Liassico di Rovereto (Trento, Italia).Paleocronache, 1: 13–24.

LOCKLEY M. G., FARLOW J. O. and MEYER C. A. (1994a) —Brontopodus and Parabrontopodus ichnogen. nov. and the sig nif i canceof wide- and nar row-gauge sauropod trackways. Gaia, 10: 135–145.

LOCKLEY M. G., LUCAS S. G. and HUNT A. P. (2006) — Eosauropus, anew name for a Late Tri as sic track: fur ther ob ser va tions on the LateTri as sic ichnogenus Tetrasauropus and re lated forms, with notes onthe lim its of in ter pre ta tion: In: The Tri as sic-Ju ras sic Ter res trial Tran si -tion (eds. H. D. Har ris, S. G. Lucas, J. A. Spielmann, M. G. Lockley, A. R. C. Milner and J. I. Kirkland). New Mex ico Mus. Natur. Hist. Sc.Bull., 37: 193–198.

LOCKLEY M. G., MEYER C. A., HUNT A. P. and LUCAS S. G. (1994b)— The dis tri bu tion of sauropod tracks and trackmakers. Gaia, 10:233–248.

LOCKLEY M. G., SANTOS V. F., RAMALHO M. M. and GALOPIM DECARVALHO A. M. (1992) — No vas jazidas de pegadas de dinossáu -rios no Jurássico su pe rior de Sesimbra (Por tu gal). Gaia, 5: 40–43.

MATEESCU I. (1958) — Studiul petrografic al cărbunilor de la Rudăria(Svinecea Mare). Anuarul Comitetului Geo logic, 31: 5–49.

McINTOSH J. S. (1990) — Sauropoda. In: The Dinosauria (eds. D. B.Weishampel, P. Dodson and H. Osmólska): 345–401. Univ. Cal i for niaPress, Berke ley.

MURGOCI G. M. (1905) — Sur l’existence d’une grande nappe derecouvrement dans les Carpathes meridionales. C. R. Acad. Sc., 7.

OLSEN P. E., KENT D. V., SUES H-D., KOEBERL C., HUBER H.,MONTANARI A., RAINFORTH E. C., FOWELL S. J., SZAJNA M. J. and HARTLINE W. (2002) — As cent of di no saur linked to an irid iumanom aly at the Tri as sic-Ju ras sic bound ary. Sci ence, 296: 1305–1307.

PIEŃKOWSKI G. (2004) — The epicontinental Lower Ju ras sic of Po land.Pol. Geol. Inst. Spec. Pap., 12.

PITTMAN J. G. and GILETTE D. D. (1989) — The Briar site: a newsauropod di no saur tracksite in Lower Cre ta ceous beds of Ar kan sas. In: Di no saur Tracks and Traces (eds. D. D. Gilette and M. G. Lockley):313–332. Cam bridge Univ. Press, Cam bridge.

POPA M. E. (1997) — Corystospermal pteridosperms in the Li assic con ti -nen tal de pos its of Ro ma nia. Acta Palaeont. Romaniae, 1: 81–87.

POPA M. E. (1998) — The Li assic con ti nen tal flora of Ro ma nia: sys tem at -ics, stra tig ra phy and paleoecology. Acta Bot. Horti Bucurestensis,(1997–1998): 177–184.

POPA M. E. (2000a) — Early Ju ras sic land flora of the Getic Nappe. Univ.Bu cha rest, Bu cha rest, unpubl. PhD The sis,.

POPA M. E. (2000b) — As pects of Ro ma nian Early Ju ras sic palaeobotanyand palynology. Part III. Phytostratigraphy of the Getic Nappe. ActaPalaeont. Romaniae, 2: 377–386.

POPA M. E. (2000c) — First find of Me so zoic tetrapod tracks in Ro ma nia.Acta Palaeont. Romaniae, 2: 387–390.

POPA M. E. (2005) — As pects of Ro ma nian Early Ju ras sic Palaeobotanyand Palynology. Part VI. Anina, an ex cep tional lo cal ity. Acta Palaeont. Romaniae, 5: 375–378.

POPA M. E. (2009) — Late Palaeozoic and Early Me so zoic con ti nen talfor ma tions of the Reşiţa Ba sin. Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti,Bu cha rest.

POPA M. E. and KĘDZIOR A. (2006) — Pre lim i nary ichnological re sultson the Steierdorf For ma tion in Anina, Ro ma nia. In: Me so zoic and Ce -no zoic ver te brates and paleoenvironments (ed. Z. Csiki): 197–201.Bucureşti.

POPA M. E. and KĘDZIOR A. (2008) — High res o lu tion paleobotany andsedimentology of the Steierdorf For ma tion, Reşiţa Ba sin. In: An nualSci en tific Ses sion “Ion Popescu Voiteşti” (eds. I. Bucur and S.Filipescu): 57–59. Cluj Univ.yPress, Cluj-Napoca.

POPA M. E. and VAN KONIJNENBURG-VAN CITTERT J. H. A. (2006)— As pects of Ro ma nian Early–Mid dle Ju ras sic palaeobotany andpalynology. Part VII. Suc ces sions and flo ras. Prog ress in Natur. Sc.,16: 203–212.

RAATH M. A. (1972) — Fos sil ver te brate stud ies in Rho de sia: a new di no -saur (Reptilia: Saurischia) from near the Trias-Ju ras sic bound ary.Arnoldia, 5: 1–37.

RĂILEANU G., NĂSTĂSEANU A. and MUTIHAC V. (1957) —Cercetări geologice n regiunea Anina — Doman (zonaReşiţa–Moldova Nouă–Banat). Ann. Ins. Geol. Roum., 2.

SANTOS V. F., LOCKLEY M. G., MEYER C. A., CARVALHO J.,GALOPIM DE CARVALHO A. M. and MORATALLA J. J. (1994) —A new sauropod tracksite from the Mid dle Ju ras sic of Por tu gal. Gaia,10: 5–13.

SANTOS V. F., MORATALLA J. J. and ROYO-TORRES R. (2009) —New sauropod trackways from the Mid dle Ju ras sic of Por tu gal. ActaPalaeont. Pol., 54: 409–422.

SCOTESE C. R. (2002) — Palaeomap pro ject; www.scotese.com

SEMAKA A. (1962) — Flora Liasică de la Anina (Banat). AnuarulComitetului Geo logic, 32: 527–569.

UPCHURCH P. (1993) — The anat omy, phy log eny, and sys tem at ics of thesauropod di no saurs. PhD. The sis, Univ. Cam bridge.

UPCHURCH P. (1994) — Sauropod phy log eny and palaeo ec ol ogy. Gaia,10: 249–260.

VREMIR M. and CODREA V. (2002) — The first Late Cre ta ceous(Maastrichtian) di no saur foot prints from Transylvania (Ro ma nia).Stud. Univ. Babe–Bolyai, Geologie, 47 (2): 93–104.

WILD R. (1978) — Ein Sauropoden-Rest (Reptilia, Saurischia) aus demPosidonienschiefer (Lias, Toarcium) von Holzmaden. Stuttgart. Beitr.Natur., (B), 41: 1–15.

WILSON J. A. and SERENO P. C. (1998) — Early Evo lu tion andHigher-level Phy log eny of Sauropod Di no saurs. J. Ver te bratePaleont., 18, Sup ple ment to No., 2: 1–68.


early ju ras sic sauropod foot prints of the south er n

Documents