e4e nys teacher evaluation memo.2012.02.15

7
1 of 7 Memorandum Executive Summary Educators 4 Excellence, a teacher-led, student-focused organization, convened over 100 teachers for a conversation with David Wakelyn, your Deputy Secretary for Education, on Thursday, February 2, 2012. The conversation was moderated by three New York City public school teachers and focused on the reasons for, and solutions to, the current impasse in negotiations about teacher evaluations. Additionally, teachers in the audi- ence shared their ideas about what should be included in an evaluation system, their hopes for how a new system could help their students, and their fears about the chal- lenges of implementation. Throughout the event we polled the teachers in attendance and the following recommendations represent the ideas and suggestions they generated. I. What is the purpose of a teacher evaluation system? “I want an evaluation system that acknowledges my impact on my students and gives me feedback about how I can continue to grow as a professional.” –New York teacher Teacher Insight All teachers want to continuously improve, but we cur- rently do not receive meaningful feedback about our prac- tice or targeted development to help us grow. Evaluations offer the opportunity to create a common language for feedback and a structure to help principals better support their teachers’ growth. Recommendations Evaluation systems must include structured sup- port systems to guarantee teachers receive mean- ingful feedback about their practice. Teachers should receive at least 5 observations each year so that supervisors can provide feedback regularly and track progress. Student survey data should be included as a measure of teacher effectiveness. To: From: Date: Re: Governor Andrew Cuomo Educators 4 Excellence February 15, 2012 New York State Teacher Evaluation Polling Data 96 percent agree with the statement: “A fair and equitable evaluation system is necessary to elevate the profession.”

Upload: educators-4-excellence

Post on 10-Oct-2014

77 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: E4E NYS Teacher Evaluation Memo.2012.02.15

1 of 7

Memorandum

Executive SummaryEducators 4 Excellence, a teacher-led, student-focused organization, convened over 100 teachers for a conversation with David Wakelyn, your Deputy Secretary for Education, on Thursday, February 2, 2012. The conversation was moderated by three New York City public school teachers and focused on the reasons for, and solutions to, the current impasse in negotiations about teacher evaluations. Additionally, teachers in the audi-ence shared their ideas about what should be included in an evaluation system, their hopes for how a new system could help their students, and their fears about the chal-lenges of implementation. Throughout the event we polled the teachers in attendance and the following recommendations represent the ideas and suggestions they generated.

I. What is the purpose of a teacher evaluation system?

“I want an evaluation system that acknowledges my impact on my students and gives me feedback about how I can continue to grow as a professional.” –New York teacher

Teacher Insight

All teachers want to continuously improve, but we cur-rently do not receive meaningful feedback about our prac-tice or targeted development to help us grow. Evaluations offer the opportunity to create a common language for feedback and a structure to help principals better support their teachers’ growth.

Recommendations

Evaluation systems must include structured sup-port systems to guarantee teachers receive mean-ingful feedback about their practice.

Teachers should receive at least 5 observations each year so that supervisors can provide feedback regularly and track progress.

Student survey data should be included as a measure of teacher effectiveness.

To:

From:

Date:

Re:

Governor Andrew Cuomo

Educators 4 Excellence

February 15, 2012

New York State Teacher Evaluation

Polling Data

96 percent agree with the statement:

“A fair and equitable evaluation system is necessary to elevate the profession.”

Page 2: E4E NYS Teacher Evaluation Memo.2012.02.15

2 of 7

II. What role should student growth data play in a new evaluation system?

“Although tests are not perfect, they are one meaningful measure of the growth my students make.” – New York teacher

Teacher Insight

We have reservations about the use of test scores because we know they can’t measure everything that goes on in our classroom. But, they are the only objective measure of our impact on students over the course of the year and should be one component of many that help paint an accurate picture of our performance. We know that our impact on our stu-dents’ matters and should be reflected in our evaluation.

Recommendation

Student growth data, based on a well-developed val-ue added model, should be one of multiple mea-sures included in any evaluation system.

III. What are teachers’ biggest concerns about evaluation?

“My principal is already overwhelmed - how is she going to be able to critically observe me, support me, and help me grow?” – New York teacher

Teacher Insight

We know that the success of any evaluation system will lie in how it is implemented. We are concerned that our principals and administrators will not be properly trained to evaluate us and to give us useful feedback. If the system is designed to help us grow as professionals, our school leaders need to have the skills to implement the system correctly. If not, we run the risk that evaluation will just become a punitive mea-sure.

Polling Data

96 percent agree with the statement:

“Growth in student learning should be a part of a teacher’s evaluation.”

Polling Data

38 percent worry that principals won’t be adequately trained.

38 percent are concerned that the system will be punitive, not supportive.

Page 3: E4E NYS Teacher Evaluation Memo.2012.02.15

3 of 7

Recommendations

Principals need to undergo rigorous training on how to properly observe teach-ers and how to give constructive feedback.

An online monitoring system needs to be developed to continually norm and verify the accuracy and reliability of principal observations across the state and over time.

Conclusion

Governor Cuomo, thank you for sending your Deputy Secretary for Education, David Wakelyn, to listen to and learn from E4E teachers. We are energized by your recent focus on finally implementing a teacher evaluation system that was promised to us two years ago. Our current system is broken and we want and need meaningful feedback to help us continue to grow as professionals. We hope that you will take our recommenda-tions into account as you finalize your plans around evaluation. We look forward to con-tinuing to share the voices of classroom teachers with New York’s “Students Lobbyist.”

Page 4: E4E NYS Teacher Evaluation Memo.2012.02.15

4 of 7

Appendix: Polling Questions

15+ years10-14 years4-9 years1-3 years

Q1. I have ____ years of experience.

43%48%

5%4%

Q2. I teach...

Early childhood

4%

25%

36%28%

6%

Elementaryschool

Middle school

Highschool

Other

Q3. To what extent do you agree: “A fair and equitable evaluation and support system is necessary to elevate the teaching profession.”

Stronglyagree

82%

14%

0%0%4%

Somewhatagree

NeutralSomewhatdisagree

Stronglydisagree

Page 5: E4E NYS Teacher Evaluation Memo.2012.02.15

5 of 7

Appendix: Polling Questions

Q4. To what extent do you agree that growth in student learning should be a part of a teacher’s evaluation?

Stronglyagree

45%40%

7%6%2%

Somewhatagree

NeutralSomewhatdisagree

Stronglydisagree

Q5. What is your greatest hope for a new evaluation system?

16%11%10%

63%

Increase teaching’s

prestige

Opportunities for professional

growth

Acknowledge effective teaching

Providesmeaningfulfeedback

Q6. What is your greatest concern about a new evaluation system?

38%

13%11%

38%

Will be punitiveand not

supportive

One componentwill outweigh

others

Teachers’ ideaswon’t beincluded

Principals won’tbe adequately

trained

Page 6: E4E NYS Teacher Evaluation Memo.2012.02.15

6 of 7

Appendix: Polling QuestionsQ7. To increase collaboration in schools,

new evaluations should include:

13%

60%

11%38%

Individualcontributions

to schoolcommunity

Peer to peerfeedback

A standardizedrubric

Multipleobservations

Page 7: E4E NYS Teacher Evaluation Memo.2012.02.15

7 of 7

About Educators 4 Excellence

For far too long, education policy has been created without a critical voice at the table – the voice of classroom teachers.

Educators 4 Excellence, a teacher-led and student-focused organization, is changing this dynamic by placing teacher voice and ideas at the forefront of the conversations that shape our classrooms and careers. Through Educators 4 Excellence, teachers can learn about education policy issues and research, network at our events with like-minded colleagues and policymakers to bridge the gap between policy and practice and take action by advocating for teacher-created policy ideas that lift student achievement and our profession.

To learn more, visit Educators4Excellence.org.