117_y_.indd 28

The Significance of Wittgenstein’s Analysis of Memory to His Philosophical Development
In this paper, I will discuss the significance of Wittgenstein’s analysis of memory to his philosophical development. The main aim of this paper is to examine John Cook’s view that Wittgenstein has remained a neutral monist and that he tried to reconcile empiricismphenomenalismand ordinary language in later years. To begin with, I will clarify his phenomenological reductionist accounts of memory and his picture theoryverification principlein his early and middle philosophy in relation to Russell’s skepticism about memory. Then, I will explain his later analysis of memory within the framework of his language game theory and contexualism. Finally, I will consider whether his later accounts of memory are characterized by phenomenological indeterminism.
1
29 254







1




3

1 243315









1 2



1

WL3032, p. 61

Solipsismus
reiner RealismusTLP, 5. 64
1929
PB,
WL3233, 22
192930
hat Realität

4 4

4 4

Daß die Welt meine Welt ist, das zeigt sich darin, daß die
Grenzen der Spracheder Sprache, die allein ich verstehedie
Grenzen meiner Welt bedeutenTLP, 5. 62

experience of each moment
our present world
6
7




36

247



4 4
LSD, p. §25




PG, §48


TLP, 2.1514, 2.1515, 5.526

Gegenstand
sensible quality





38

245

11

4 4
§58, cf. BB, p. 31
§57

12



4
4


1
39 244


1931 6 1933



memory-image
WL3032, p. 48


multiplicity

PG-I,








cf. WL3032, p. 48.

PB, p. 118

1
41 242
Bild
PU-I, §604






42

241





1



TLP,
4.22





1
43 240

TLP,
3
4



4 4 4




P 22




PB, §1

Phänomenologie








PB, §43





PB, §282, 283
WL3032,
p. 110PB, §228



25

PB, §57





PB, §49

1
47 236
26



cf. PB, §58








PB,
§48



…
scheinenIrrtum


optische
TäuschungFehler

Aussehen



sachlich






1
G
19321935WL3233
1932193322


4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
4 4 4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
1927 29








52

231


5
31
5







I

34





36
37






38
39








56

227


WWK,




bPB, §49
41

1
57 226



bWWK, p.53, cf. PB,
§49a



b1
cf. PB, §49







sense-data
58

225
remember 42
a





43

PU-II, xi, 222g., h.,
i.
222g, h222i.
2
44




WL, 3233, §24
WL, 3233, §25
PB, §56









……









cf. PB, §57



Bild
PB, §52




PB, §49
62

221






PB, §49
1
63 220


4









2






2
1





…
PB, §19
66

217

…

4 4 4 4 4 4
bedeutenPB, §16






X Y

X Y


b








1931
recognition
b autono-
mous
c




e






c

d



isterscheinen





de



1
bautonomous
d





……







LPE, p. 80
MWL3033.193233
MWL3033, p. 266




autonomous


48











1
73 210






Z,





1 Norman Malcolm, Memory and Mind, Conell University Press, 1977 2 cf.
74

209
1916 radical empiricism neutral monism John W. Cook, Wittgensetin’s METAPHYSICS, Cambridge University Press, 1994, Introduction xv.
3
4 222j
5 Bertrand Russell, On the Nature of Acquaintance1914, reprinted in Logic and Knowledge, ed. Robert C. MarshAllen and Unwin, 1956, p. 133.
6 Ibid., p. 133 7 Op. cit., p. 134 8 cf.…
LSD, p. 109 9
PU-I, §87
10 1984 12 56
1
75 208
11 universal
sensible qualityparticular sense data Bertrand Russell, The Problems of PhilosophyOxford University press, 1912, pp. 99101 1964101104
12 Ibid., p. 95. 98 13
be acquainted withOp. cit., p. 101. 104 14 I
cf. PU-I, 47 15 cf
John Locke, An Essay concerning Human Understanding, ed. by Nidditch, P. H.
Oxford, 1975III, i. 3. J 1976
16 Op. cit., III, ii, 1. 17 Op. cit., III, ii, 6. 18 Op. cit., I, ii, 10. 19 Op. cit., II, x, 2. 20 iiiiii
1980 common use 89
76

207
21 1932 WWK, pp. 209210
22 cf.RLP,pp.35f. 23

4 4 4 4
it must be possible some- how to accommodate what we commonly say by the use of tensesCook, Wittgensetin’s METAPHYSICS, p. 245
24
25 cf. WWW, p. 159. 26
1 110 2008 2
27 Bertrand Russell, The Analysis of Mind1921, reprinted 1995 by Routlege, Lecture IX MEMORY, Outline of Philosophy1927, reprinted 1989 by Routlege, 10. Imagination and Memory
28 G.E. Moore, “Wittgenstein’s Lectures in 193033” in Philosophical Papers London, 1959.
29 misleading
1
77 206
Outline of Philosophy, op. cit., pp, 5f. 30 The Analysis of Mind, op. cit., pp. 159f
1993188 31

WL3233, 22 32 Outline of Philosophy, op. cit., p. 6. 33 193233 22
meaningless
22 WL3233, §22 Bild

34 The Analysis of Mind, op. cit., pp. 159160. 188 35 David Hume, A Treatise of Human NatureOxford, 1978, I, III, iv.
1968135 36


37 The Analysis of Mind, op. cit., p. 163 192 38 Ibid., p. 165. 196 39 Op. cit., p. 159. 187 40 Op. cit., pp. 163f 193 41
cf. WL3033, IIIG
42 The Problem of Philosophy1912, reprinted 1959 by Oxford University, pp. 48f. 195449
43 cf. PB, §86. A
44 199246 4849
1
79 204
… It seems to me WL3032, p. 83
45 Cook 46cf. Wittgenstein’s METAPHYSICS, pp. 247f
46 The Ultimated Constituents of Matter1915, reprinted in Mysticism and LogicAllen and Unwin, 1986pp. 128f. 4 19591467

2002 262 54 Nunc stans

Arthur Schopenhauer, Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung, Werke in Zwei Bänden I, Hanser, 1977, S. 54. 451978259 Ibid,. §54. 511
80

203
Op. cit., S. 54. 510 68 Op. cit., S. 68. 654 Reale Objekte gibt es aber nur in der GegenwartOp. cit., S. 54. 509
4 4 4 4 4
Die gegenwärtige Erfahrung nur hat RealitätPB, §54 Op. cit., S. 54. 509
27 2002 2007

47 Wittgensetin’s METAPHYSICS, p. 290. 48 n
→ →
1
81 202
49 12 2006
2 110 2009