목차 · 2016. 1. 26. · 30 2016 gastroenterology winter school. take-home message looking on the...
TRANSCRIPT
목차
빈틈없고 안아프게 대장내시경 하기 ………………………………… 7
대장 염증성 병변의 진단 …………………………………………… 35
대장 종양성 병변의 진단과 치료 ………………………………… 73
2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Session 3. 대장
빈틈없고 안아프게
대장내시경 하기
김 은 란
2016 gastroenterology Winter School
통증을 유발하는 원인
과신전에 의한 내장통
- 삽입된 내시경이 대장을 밀어 붙이는 기계적인 힘
- 과다한 공기의 주입
환자 스스로 느끼는 지각과민
대장의 해부학
고정되는 부위 : 직장의 복막 반 이하, 하행결장, 상행결장
고정되지 않는 부위 : 직장 상부, S 자 결장, 횡행결장
고정점 : 하부직장, S자-하행결장 접합부, 비만곡부, 간만곡부, 맹장
대장내시경 검사를 시작하기에 앞서..
빈틈없이 안 아프게 하는 대장내시경
Eun Ran Kim, M.D. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine Samsung Medical Center
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 7
Ideal Distance
Cotton PB et al. Practical gastrointestinal endoscopy: the fundamentals. 6th ed. UK. Blackwell Publishing, 2008
대장의 해부학적 구조
8 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
대장이 과도하게 긴 경우
- 여성 > 남성, 고령환자, 만성변비환자
유동성이 심한 경우
- 성인의 약 15% : 태아발생과정에서 하행결장의 장간막 고정변이
- 횡경막결장인대의 유동성이 심한 경우
장 유착이 있는 경우
- 자궁 적출술과 같은 부인과 수술, 복막염 동반한 복부수술
게실질환이 있는 경우
장의 팽창에 대해 민감성이 높은 경우 (e.g. 과민성 장 증후군..)
대장 정결이 제대로 안 되었거나 적절한 전처치 약물의 투여가 안된 경우
★ 자신의 실력과 포기할 timing을 잘 알아야 한다!!!
이런 환자는 내시경이 어렵다!!!
안 아프게 하는 대장내시경
Eun Ran Kim, M.D. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine Samsung Medical Center
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 9
Neutral or straight (중립)
대장내시경 삽입의 기본 수기
선단부 굴절 (Tip deflexion)
밀어넣기와 뒤로 빼기 (Push-in and pull-back)
축 비틀기 (Torque)
송기와 흡인 (Suction air frequently, less air)
가볍게 흔들기 (Jiggling)
주름걸어 당기기 (Hooking the fold)
시계방향으로 축 회전 (Right turn shortening)
미끄러져 들어가기 (Push-through and sliding)
복부압박 (External compression)
체위변화 (Position change)
Always neutral or straight
10 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Air suction (공기 흡인)
굴곡이 있는 부위의 앞쪽에서는 흡인 조작을 충분히
해서 굴곡을 최소한으로
상행결장 삽입시 유용: 공기 흡인 만으로 내강이 끌어
당겨 지면서 밀어 넣는 효과
Torque (축 비틀기)
한쪽으로 비틀어 통과한 후에는 반드시 반대쪽으로 비틀어 중립상태로
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 11
Pull-back in transverse colon
Push-in and pull-back (밀어 넣기와 뒤로 빼기)
내시경을 빼는 목적
- 충분한 시야확보
(무리한 전진은 합병증으로 연결된다.)
- loop를 풀기 위해
내시경을 밀기만 하면 다양한 형태의 loop가 만들어 질 수 있다.
12 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Hooking the fold (주름걸어 당기기)
Jiggling (rapid to and fro motion, 가볍게 흔들기)
장을 단축하거나 직선화시키고 싶은 경우 언제나
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 13
Right turn shortening (시계방향 축 회전)
내시경의 축을 시계방향으로 비틀면서 뒤로 빼는 동작
그러나 atypical loop가 형성된 경우에는 시계반대방향으로 비틀면서
뒤로 빼는 동작이 유용하기도
Hooking the fold (주름걸어 당기기)
14 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
N loop of the Sigmoid Colon
Cotton PB et al. Practical gastrointestinal endoscopy: the fundamentals. 6th ed. UK. Blackwell Publishing, 2008
Clockwise twist and Withdrawal
Loop of the Sigmoid Colon
Cotton PB et al. Practical gastrointestinal endoscopy: the fundamentals. 6th ed. UK. Blackwell Publishing, 2008
N loop (79%/47%) α loop (12%/12%)
reverse α loop (11%/6%)
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 15
External compression (복부압박)
Sliding (미끄러져 들어가기)
굴곡이 심한 부위에서 모든 수단을 동원해도 관강이 보이지 않는 경우,
관강이 있을 것으로 생각되는 방향을 정확히 예측할 수 있다면
내시경 선단부를 그 방향으로 굴절시킨 후 관강을 보지 못한 상태에서
내시경을 밀어서 장관 벽을 따라 미꾸러져 들어가기도 한다
.
16 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Take-Home Message
충분한 대장 정결
첫 1-2분이 가장 중요
공기의 주입은 최소한으로
삽입보다는 단축
Torque와 Right turn shortening을 적절히 이용
같은 동작은 3회 이상 반복하지 않기
자세변화와 복부압박을 적절히 이용
Position change (체위변화)
우측와위 : S-자 결장-하행결장 이행부와 비만곡부 통과시
앙와위 : 횡행결장 통과시
좌측와위 : 간만곡부 통과시
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 17
빈틈없이 하는 대장내시경
Eun Ran Kim, M.D. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine Samsung Medical Center
24
Take-Home Message
절 대 무 리 하 지 않 는 다 !!!
18 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Scrutinize : 면밀히 검사하다
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 19
Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps : a prospective multicenter study of back to back colonoscopy
Endoscopy 2008; 40: 284-290
Polyp Miss Rates by Tandem Colonoscopy : A systemic review
Rijn J. Am J Gastro 2006;101:343-350
20 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
What is optimal withdrawal technique?
Two experienced endoscopists (miss rate 17% vs 48%)
Video-taped 10 consecutive colonoscopic withdrawals- assessed
by 4 experts
Rex DK. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:33-36
Criterion 17% 48% p
Looking on the proximal sides of folds 31.5 19.6 <0.001
Adequacy of cleaning 33.1 21.9 <0.001
Adequacy of distention 33.5 24.0 <0.001
Adequacy of time spent viewing 32.4 21.0 <0.001
Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polys : a prospective multicenter study of back to back colonoscopy
Endoscopy 2008; 40: 284-290
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 21
Viewing behind the Fold
대장내시경의 맹점부위
22 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Withdrawal Times and Adenoma Detection during Screening Colonoscopy
N Engl J Med 2006;355:2533-41
Impact of withdrawal speed on polyp yield
Simmons DT, et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006: 24, 965–971
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 23
Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate
Gastrointest Endosc 2013;77:381-9
Long mean withdrawal time is associated with increased adenoma detection
Lee TJ Wet al. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 20–26
24 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Detection of Adenomas in Asymptomatic Individuals
Continuous Quality Improvement Targets
- Adenoma prevalence rates detected during colonoscopy in
persons
undergoing first-time examinations
25% in men older than 50
15% in women older than 50
Rex DK Gastrintest Endosc 2006;63(suppl):S16-S28
NHS BCSP Publication No 6 February 2011
Withdrawal Times
Continuous Quality Improvement Targets
- Mean withdrawal times should average at least 6-10 min.
Mean inspection time ≥ 6 minutes on withdrawal from caecal pole to
anus in negative procedures.
Recommend that the average withdrawal time is audited during
screening colonoscopies and propose a minimum of 6 minutes
in at least 90% of purely diagnostic examinations.
Rex DK (ASGE) Gastrintest Endosc 2006;63(suppl):S16-S28
Rembacken B et al. (ESGE) Endoscopy 2012; 44: 957–968
NHS BCSP Publication No 6 February 2011
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 25
Polyp detection rate is improved with position change
East J. GIE 2007;65:263-269
Proposed minimum colonoscopic withdrawal time
26 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
East J. GIE 2007;65:263-269
Polyp detection rate is improved with position change
Polyp detection rate is improved with position change
East J. GIE 2007;65:263-269
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 27
Wide angle colonoscopy
A. Standard (140 angle of view) B. wide angle (170 angle of view)
Third eye retroscope
Potential methods to improve detection
See behind folds better See flat lesions better
Wide angle colonoscopy Chromoendoscopy
Colonoscopy in retroflexion High definition
Cap-fitted colonoscopy Narrow band image
Third eye retroscope Autofluorescence
28 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
The efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in polyp detection and cecal intubation
: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107:1165– 1173
Forest plot on the proportion of patients with polyps detected.
Cap-fitted colonoscopy
Various imaging colonoscopy
A.White light B. Autofluorescence C. NBI D. Chromoendoscopy
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 29
Transparent Cap-Assisted Colonoscopy Versus Standard Adult Colonoscopy
: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55: 218–225
The efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in poly detection and cecal intubation
: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107:1165– 1173
Forest plot on the proportion of patients with adenomas detected.
30 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Take-Home Message
Looking on the proximal sides of folds
Adequate of cleaning
Adequate of distention : air , position changes
Adequate of time spent viewing
: a minimum of 6 minitues
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 31
대장 염증성 병변의 진단
김 영 호
2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Stomach
Bx : No malignant cell H. pylori-associated
chronic gastritis
Tx : PPI
염증성 장질환
Winter School 2016
성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 소화기내과
김영호
6
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 35
Today’s Topic
Colonoscopy with biopsy is not enough.
Colon
Bx : No malignant cell, Chromic active inflammation
Tx : Steroid/Mesalazine
PMH : Oral ulcer
36 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Endoscopic Features of UC
Mild
loss of vascular tranasluscency, fine granularity, redness, minute yellow spots
Moderate
coarse mucosal erosions, small ulcers, friability, attachment of mucopurulent exudates
Severe
extensive ulcers, profuse spontaneous bleeding
“Continuous, superficial inflammation from rectum” “confined to rectum and colon”
Ulcerative Colitis
• Bloody diarrhea
• Abdominal pain
• Urgency
• Tenesmus
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 37
Endoscopic Findings of Ulcerative Colitis
Endoscopic Findings of Ulcerative Colitis
38 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Histologic Findings of Ulcerative Colitis
Mayo Endoscopic Subscore
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;7:15
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 39
Hemorrhoids
Differential Diagnosis of Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding
• Inflammatory bowel disease
• Benign anorectal disease : hemorrhoids, anal fissure, fistula-in-ano, varices
• Neoplasia
• Diverticular disease
• Arteriovenous malformation
• Radiation enterocolitis
40 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Nonspecific Colitis
Hemorrhoids
• Hemorrhoids – bright red blood – not mixed with stool – on the toilet tissue – dripping into the toilet
when straining or at the end of defecation
• Ulcerative colitis - diarrhea
- mucoid stool
- urgency
- tenesmus
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 41
Case
• 69 yr old man
• 8 days ago, lower abdominal pain
• 6 days ago, diarrhea with fever
• 3 days ago, hematochezia
• WBC 15240/L, CRP 24.08 g/dL
Nonspecific Colitis
42 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Infectious Colitis
• Symptoms – acute onset – fever, vomiting, abd pain, frequent bowel
movement • Endoscopy
– severe hyperemia, profuse exudate – rectal sparing, patchy distribution
Stool Culture : Shigella sonnei
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 43
Infectious Colitis
• Regardless of the etiology, clinical symptoms are quite
similar.
• It is hard to prove the existence of pathogens.
• Patients whose symptoms have not improved within 1
week should undergo a sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy.
Infectious Colitis
• Pathologic findings suggesting UC
– crypt architecture distortion
– mixed lamina propria cellularity
– basal lymphoid aggregates
– villous surface
– crypt atrophy
– surface erosion
44 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Colonoscopic Findings of Infectious Colitis
• UC (ulcertive colitis)-like
– Shigella, Salmonella, Campylobacter, Amoeba
• CD (Crohn’s disease)-like
– Salmonella, Campylobacter, Yersinia, Amoeba
M/52 • 5 days ago, mild fever, mucoid stool, diarrhea, low abdominal
pain • PMH : Tx with pneumonia 3 weeks ago • C. difficele toxin assay (+)
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 45
Salmonellosis
UC-like CD-like
Infectious Colitis
Shigella UC-like
Yersinia CD-like
46 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Case
• 51 yr old man
• Previously healthy
• 1 day ago, sudden onset of abdominal pain, followed by
hematochezia
Amoebic Colitis
UC-like CD-like
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 47
Ischemic Colitis
• Old age • Sudden onset of abdominal pain & hemtochezia • Endoscopy
– hyperemia, edema, ulceration – rectal sparing – resolved within 1-2 weeks – Bx : coagulation necrosis
48 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Case
• 29 yr old female
• 2001.1. cervix ca -> radiation + chemotherapy
• 2001.8. hematochezia
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 49
Radiation Colitis Vienna Rectoscopy Score
• Telangiectasia: Grade 0: none; Grade 1: single telangiectasia; Grade 2: multiple non-confluent telangiectasia; Grade 3: multiple confluent telangiectasia
• Congested mucosa: Grade 0: none; Grade 1: focal reddening of the mucosa combined with edematous mucosa; Grade 2: diffuse non-confluent reddening of the mucosa combined with edematous mucosa; Grade 3: diffuse con-fluent reddening of the mucosa combined with edematous mucosa
• Ulceration: Grade 0: none; Grade 1: micro-ulceration with or without superficial < 1 cm2; Grade 2: superficial > 1 cm2; Grade 3: deep ulceration; Grade 4: fistula, perforation
• Stricture: Grade 0: none; Grade 1: more than two-thirds of the regular diameter; Grade 2: One-third to two-third of the regular diameter; Grade 3: less than one-third of the regular diameter; Grade 4: complete obstruction
• Necrosis: Grade 0: none; Grade 1: necrosis
• Types of mucosal reactions were then subsumed according to the Vienna Rectoscopy Score (Score 0–5; Table 1).
Wachter S et al. Radiother Oncol 2000;54:11
Radiation Colitis
• Radiation history due to cervix ca or prostatic ca
• Endoscopy
– proximal rectum & distal sigmoid colon
– mucosal friability
– granularity with spontaneous bleeding
– multiple telangiectasia
50 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
• 48 yr old female
• 10 years ago, constipation with straining
• Anal bleeding, mucoid stool, tenesmus, lower
abdominal pain
Case
Radiation Colitis Vienna Rectoscopy Score
Wachter S et al. Radiother Oncol 2000;54:11
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 51
Defecography
Colonoscopy
Colonoscopic Biopsy : Tubular Adenoma with Erosion
52 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome
• Histology – characteristic – obliteration of lamina propria by fibromuscular
proliferation of the muscularis mucosa – streaming of fibroblasts and muscle fibers up between
crypts – thickening of muscularis mucosa – branching, distorted glandular crypts – diffuse collagen infiltration of lamina propria
Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome
• A chronic course characterized by rectal bleeding, disordered
defecation, tenesmus and mucorrhea
• Endoscopy
– anterior wall, 4 to 15 cm from the anal verge
– shallow ulcers with white, sloughy base surrounded by a
thin rim of erythematous mucosa
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 53
Case
• 37 yr old female
• 2001.9. hematochezia -> sigmoidoscopy
– Diagnosed as ulcerative proctitis
• Maintenance with 5-ASA suppository
• 2003.1. RLQ pain -> colonoscopy
Skip ? Patchy ? Rectal Sparing ?
Endoscopic Findings
Ulcerative colitis Crohn’s disease
Ractal sparing rarely frequently
Continuous disease yes occasionally
Cobblestone no yes
Granulaoma on biopsy no occasionally
54 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Crohn’s Disease
• Aphthous ulcer • Longitudinal ulcer • Cobblestone appearance
“Discontinuous, transmural inflammation from esophagus to rectum”
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 55
Crohn’s Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity
크론병 진단기준개정안 (일본후생청, 1995)
56 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 57
Crohn’s Disease
58 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Crohn’s Disease
Crohn’s Disease
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 59
Tuberculous Colitis
Tuberculous Colitis
60 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Prospective Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of Interferon-ɣ Assay in the Differential Diagnosis of ITB & CD
Kim BJ et al, Inflamm Bowel Dis 2011;17:1308
결핵성 장염_조직 검사
• 어디서 ? – 균배양 : 궤양 저부 – 건락성 육아종 : 궤양 저부와 변연부
• 크론병과 다른 점 – AFB +, Caseating granuloma + – 육아종이 많고 크다. – 육안적으로 정상인 부위에서 조직 검사를 하면 정상 소견이다.
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 61
Case
• Male, 34 years old • Abdominal pain, diarrhea & weight less (5 Kg) for 2 months • Past history of anal fistula
• CRP 9.67 mg/dL
Diagnosis of Tuberculous Colitis_Korean Guideline
62 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Case
• Colonoscopic biopsy – focal active inflammation with non-caseating granuloma – AFB smear (-) – M. tuberculosis PCR (-)
• Tuberculin skin test (-)
Case
• Focal active inflammation with non-caseating granulomas and erosions
• AFB (1+) 1-9/100HPF
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 63
Tuberculous Colitis
Case • Therapeutic trial with anti-TB medication • Colonoscopy F/U 2 mo later
64 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Behçet’s Disease
Intestinal Tuberculosis vs Crohn’s Disease
Lee YJ, et al. Endoscopy 2006;38:592
Characteristic of Tb Involvement of fewer than 4 segments A patulous IC valve Transverse ulcers Scars or pseudopolyps
Characteristic of CD Anorectal lesions Longitudinal ulcers Aphthous ulcers Cobblestone appearance
PPV for CD : 94.9% PPV for TB : 88.9%
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 65
Behçet’s Disease
Lee CR, et al. Inflammatory Bowel Disease 2001;7:243
Behçet’s Disease
66 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Behçet’s Disease
Behçet’s Disease
Typical colonoscopic finding ;
Single or a few deep round/oval ulcers with discrete
margin in ileocecal area
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 67
M/52 • Low abdominal discomfort
Bx : focal active inflammation, terminal ileum
Lee SK et al, Endoscopy 2009;41:9
Sensitivity 94.3% Specificity 90.0%
Differential Diagnosis of Crohn’s Disease & BD by Colonscopic Findings
68 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
F/24 • 2개월 전 외부 병원에서 건강 검진으로 대장내시경 시행
M/52 • Diarrhea (-) Hematochezia (-) Wt loss (-) Oral ulcer (-)
• ESR/CRP : normal
• “복통이나 설사가 심해지거나 혈변이 생기면 들리세요”
Colonoscopy, 1 year later
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 69
Conclusion
Colonoscopy with biopsy is not enough.
F/24 • 현재 특이 증상 없음 • 건강 검진 1주일전 발열, 복통, 설사
Colonoscopy 6 mo later
70 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
대장 종양성 병변의 진단과 치료
장 동 경
2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Colon Polyps (Epithelial origin)
Neoplastic Non-neoplastic
Premalignant polyp Mucosal tagTubular adenoma HyperplasticTubulovillous adenoma InflammatoryVillous adenoma Juvenile
Carcinoma in situ: D01.0~01.2 (by 2010 AJCC staging)High-grade dysplasiaIntraepithelial cancer (CIS)Intramucosal cancer (infiltrating into lamina propria)
Invasive carcinoma: C18 ~20Submucosal cancer (Malignant polyp) –beyond the m.m.
Sungkyunkwan University, School of MedicineSamsung Medical Center
Dong Kyung Chang
2016 Winter School
대장 종양성 병변의 진단과 치료
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 73
Adenomatous Polyp
Ip Isp Is
0.2 cm
IIa
Paris endoscopy classification for superficial (type 0) lesions (tumors with superficial invasion:M,SM)
*Protruding lesions are elevated more than 2.5 mm.
Ip
74 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Classification of LSTs
LST-G (granular) 46%
LST-NG (non-granular) 54%
Kudo: LST-G-H (homogeneous)Paris: IIa 30%
LST-G-M (nodular mixed)IIa + Is 16%
Kudo: LST-NG-F(flat elevated)Paris: IIa 41%
LST-NG-PD (pseudodepressed)IIc + IIa, IIa + IIc 13%
Kudo S. 1993Kudo S et al. Stomach and Intestine. 2005. 40;1367Kudo S et al. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;68(S4):S3
LST: Lateral spreading tumor (> 1cm)
G-H (Granular type – Homogeneous) NG-F (flat elevated)
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 75
Multifocal submucosa-invading cancer
LST-G: 1/7 (14.3%)LST-NG: 5/20 (25.0%)
Shinji Tanaka 2006. Basic Technique of EMR and ESD for colorectal tumors
LST-GLST-G-H M 22.9 13.5 39.5
SM 1.8 1.0 3.4LST-G-M M 33.5 25.4 38.0
SM 18.0 5.1 25.0
LST-NGLST-NG-F M 12.7 11.3 17.9
SM 4.1 1.9 11.9LST-NG-PD M 23.5 19.6 31.8
SM 25.0 15.2 45.5
M/SM total (%) < 2 cm(%) > 2 cm(%)
Proportion of M/SM cancers according to the type and the size of the LST
Yamano H et al. Stomach and Intestine. 2007.
76 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Rectal LST-G-M, 5 cm
Adenocarcinoma, (well differentiated) in the pre-existing adenoma
Adenoma size: 5.0 x 4.5 cmCancer Size: 0.4 x 0.2 cm
Depth of invasion: intraepithelial carcinoma(pTis)
LST-G-MN type
An invasive cancer focus in the large nodule
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 77
Hyperplastic Polyp
Neoplastic vs. Non-neoplastic
Neoplastic : benign vs. malignant
Malignant : mucosal vs. submucosal or deeper
Three steps to observe polyps for treatment plan
Methods:
Gross endoscopic appearance
Vascular pattern analysis
Pit pattern analysis etc.
78 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Inflammatory polyp
Tuberculosis scar
Cecum
Ascending colon
Inflammatory polyp
Ulcerative colitis
Ascending colon
Sigmoid colon
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 79
Cecal fold thickening ? tubular adenoma
Adenomatous
Polyp
Hyperplastic
Polyp
80 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Serrated Adenoma, ascending colon
염증? Tubular adenoma with High grade dysplasia!
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 81
Endoscopic Appearance of Depressed type Early Colon Cancers
Color change: hyperemic,
rarely whitish (ddx. with hyperplastic polyp)
Spontaneous bleeding, or bleeding induced by air-inflation
Wall deformity
Irregular-edged depression
Early colon cancer: IIc+IIa
de-novo cancer ?
82 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Increased air volume Decreased air volume
Air-induced deformity in M/SM1 cancer
Gross Endoscopic Appearances suggestive ofMassive Malignant Submucosal Invasion
Size & Gross type: depressed >1 cm, flat or superficial elevated > 2 cm, protruded or LST > 3 cm
Hardness, stiffness, or rigiditySevere depression, erosion, or ulcerPolyp on polyp (Buddha) appearanceFold convergenceLoss of air-induced deformityPit pattern : type Vn (nonstructural)
Non-lifting sign
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 83
Adenocarcinoma, W/D- extension to submucosa
Fold convergence, Polyp on polyp appearance…
Adenocarcinoma, W/D- extension to the Muscularis Propria
Hardness, non-lifting…
84 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
바늘이 고유근층을 뚫으면 융기되지 않는다. cf) Non-lifting sign (+)인 경우: 주위 점막은 잘 융기.
Fold convergence, hardness, erosions,
Loss of air-induced deformity, non-lifting…
Adenocarcinoma, W/D- extension to submucosa
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 85
Pit Pattern Classification & Treatment
I: normal II: stellate
IIIL : large tubular IIIS :small round
VI : irregular VN : non-structural
IV: branched, gyriform
Kudo S et al, Endosccopy 2001;33:367
Non-neoplastic : No treatment
Adenoma: Endoscopicresection
SM Cancer: Surgery
Cancer: Endoscopic resection(en bloc)
Do not try submucosal injection if you are not prepared to do complete resection!
D0 D7Fibrosis 생겨서 en bloc resection 안 됨.
-> Piecemeal EMR과 coagulation으로 제거
LST는 ESD를고려하는경우라면 biopsy도 1 – 2 개만가볍게!!
86 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
NBI international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) classification
Tanaka S, Sano Y. Dig Endosc. 2011 May;23 Suppl 1:131-9
EndoscopicResection
SurgeryNo treatmentor Endoscopic Resection
NBI – Vascular pattern: Sano classification
Tanaka S, Sano Y. Dig Endosc. 2011 May;23 Suppl 1:131-9
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 87
Hyperplastic polyp, ascending colon
Sungkyunkwan University, School of MedicineSamsung Medical Center
Dong Kyung Chang
Serrated Polyps
88 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Sessile Serrated Adenoma, ascending colon
Sessile Serrated Adenoma, ascending colon
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 89
Study Data source Total detected cancers, n
Interval cancers
Overall, n (%)
Proximal, n (%)
Distal, n (%)
Baxter et al2011
Ontario Ca Registry (2000–2005) 34,312 1260 (9.0) 676 (12.4) 584 (6.8)
Singh et al2010
Manitoba Ca Registry(1992–2008) 4883 388 (7.9) 225 (11.3) 147 (5.3)
Cooper et al 2012
SEER-Medicare DB (1994–2005) 57,839 4192 (7.2) 2851 (9.9) 1253 (4.5)
Frequency and Location of Interval CRCs
Patel SG, Ahnen DJ. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2014; 12:7-15
Colonoscopies have resulted in an overall reduction of
-CRC-related deaths by 29%-Deaths from distal CRC by 47%
-No observed reduction in deaths caused by proximal CRC
* More right-sided CRC cases in the setting of previousnegative colonoscopic examinations (interval carcinomas)
PROBLEM POSING
Singh H, Nugent Z, Demers AA, et al. The reduction in colorectal cancer mortality after colonoscopy varies by site of the cancer. Gastroenterology 2010;139:1128-37
90 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
• Serrated = saw-tooth like
• 36% of colonic polyps
• Past: Hyperplastic polyp - the only recognized serrated polyp
• A heterogeneous family of polyps
- Hyperplastic polyp
- Sessile Serrated adenoma/polyp
- Traditional Serrated adenoma
SERRATED POLYPS
Pabby et al21 and Robertson et al37
•50% - 75% of interval CRCs : missed or incompletely resected lesions•less than 30% : rapidly progressing lesions.
Missed LesionsAdenoma detection rates (ADRs) : 17 – 47% (serrated polyps : 1 – 18%)Tandem colonoscopy (van Rijn et al 2006)/colonoscopy in tandem with CT colonography (Pickhardt et al 2003)
overall adenoma miss rate : 22%, miss rate for adenomas of 10 mm or greater : 2% - 12%
Incomplete PolypectomyOverall incomplete resection rate: 10.1% (6.5%–22.7%) (Pohl et al 2013)
- Larger polyps :5.8% (for 5-7mm) vs 23.3% (for 15- 20 mm)- Sessile serrated polyps (vs adenomas): 31% vs 7.2%
Rapid ProgressionLynch syndrome MSI, CIMP, and lower rates of KRAS mutations serrated polyp pathwaySessile serrated polyps : common in the right colon, missed frequently during endoscopy, and a higher rate of incomplete resection.42
Etiology of Interval Colorectal Cancers
Patel SG, Ahnen DJ. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2014; 12:7-15
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 91
Hyperplastic polyp (Microvesicular type)
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY 2013:77(3);360 -375
Normal colon
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY 2013:77(3);360 -375
92 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
- 5% (1 ~ 9%) of all colonic polyps
- median 62years, 50 – 65% in women
Sessile Serrated Adenoma/Polyp (SSA/P)
Sessile serrated adenoma/polyp (SSA/P)
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY 2013:77(3);360 -375
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 93
Histological features- serrations in the whole length of crypts- boot-, inverted T- shaped, horizontally oriented crypt bases- tends to lack both a thickened subepithelial collagen table and
a prominence of neuroendocrine cells
Recent expert consensus opinions have simplified thediagnostic difficulties:
First, a single crypt with unequivocal dilation, distortion, and/orhorizontally branched crypt is sufficient to establish a dx of SSA/P
Second, clinicians are advised to manage any hyperplasticpolyp >10 mm proximal to the sigmoid as an SSA/P.
SSA/P
Endoscopic features
- predilection for the right colon- flat or sessile- usually > 5 mm- tends to be redder than the other serrated polyps,
(less red than the conventional adenomas)- a yellow-tinged mucus cap, a rim of debris or bubbles,alteration of mucosal fold contour, indistinct borders, andobscuring of submucosal vasculature
“SSA/P is typically flat with indistinct borders, makingrecognition and complete excision challenging.”
Pit pattern : type II open–shape pit pattern (type II-O)- represent dilated crypt bases (wider and rounder)
SSA/P
94 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
- Precancerous lesion as itself
- A greater polyp burden, and synchronous and metachronousneoplastic lesions
“Identification of SSA/Ps requires increased vigilance for lesions elsewhere in the colon”
- Common cause of interval cancer
* Interval cancer- Missed precursor lesions- Incomplete subtotal polyp resection- Rapidly growing precursor lesions Small, flat, indistinct-bordered, and right-sided polyps (suchas SSA/Ps) are a high risk of interval cancer
Clinical significance of SSA/P
Nomenclature
Why SSA/P? (SSA = SSP)
The term “adenoma” historically implied low-grade dysplasia
SSA/P without cytologic dysplasia lacks the cytologic featurestypically seen in low-grade dysplasia in the tubular adenoma
- “sessile serrated polyp” : no or serrated dysplasia(not conventional dysplasia)
- “sessile serrated adenoma” : malignant potential
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 95
Traditional serrated adenoma, Descending colon
- TSA was introduced in 1990- < 1% of all colonic polyps
Endoscopically,- usually left-side predominant,- pedunculated or sub-pedunculated- usually > 5 mm- granulonodular and lobular appearance (like
conventional adenoma)
Pit pattern:often combined pit patterns: type II and/or IIIS/IIIL(not common in the conventional adenoma)
Traditional serrated adenoma (TSA)
96 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Sessile serrated neoplastic pathway
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY 2013:77(3);360 -375
MOLECULAR ASPECTS OF THE SERRATED NEOPLASTIC PATHWAY
Molecular genetics of CRC - 3 most established pathways
(1) Chromosome instability pathway: APC, K-RAS-P53
(2) DNA mismatch repair pathway:
MMR(MSH2, MLH1, MSH6, PMS2) MSI
(3) CpG island hypermethylation (CIMP) pathway the
central defect of the serrated pathway of neoplasia.
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 97
- 1.8 – 4 % of colonoscopy patients
- Median ages: 50 – 62 years
- Up to nearly 40% risk of CRC
A study of 4,462 polyps from 100 pts with serrated polyposis- 83% were serrated polyps
(156 MVHPs, 25 GCHPs, 138 SSAs, 18 TSAs)- 17% were conventional adenomas
(55 tubular adenomas, 14 tubulovillous adenomas).
Serrated polyposis
Serrated polyposis (formerly, hyperplastic polyposis)
WHO criteria for serrated polyposis
- At least 5 serrated polyps proximal to the sigmoid colon,at least 2 polyps 10 mm, or
- Any number of serrated polyps proximal to the sigmoidcolon in an individual who has a first-degree relative withserrated polyposis, or
- 20 serrated polyps of any size distributed throughoutthe colon
98 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Management of Serrated Polyposis
All proximal colon polyps or all serrated polyps > 5 mmshould be completely removed, if numerous diminutivepolyps are observed.
Colon resection can be advised for colorectal cancer orwhen endoscopic control of polyps is no longer feasible.
Given the malignant potential of the SSA/P, TSA, and filiformSA, complete endoscopic resection is critical.
- All proximal serrated polyps (proximal to the sigmoidcolon) should be removed
- All proximal serrated polyps > 10 mm diagnosed ashyperplastic polyps should be clinically managed as SSA/Ps
When SSA/P margins cannot be fully resected, residualtissue can be removed by cold forceps or burned by APC,and close endoscopic follow-up is advised- 1 year per the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force guidelines- 3 ~ 6 months per expert consensus opinions
CLINICAL MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 99
Natural History of Untreated Polyp
• A study using serial sigmoidoscopy for tattooed colorectal polyps < 1 cm(not all of which would have been adenomas) over the course of 3 to 5 years
– 4% increased in size – 70% remained unchanged – 8% were smaller– 18% disappeared
• A diminutive adenoma(<0.5 cm) requires 2 to 3 years to reach 1 cm size
Kozuka S. Dis Colon Rectum 1975
대장용종조직검사 vs. 용종제거술
100 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Surgical polypectomies Colonoscopic polypectomiesAdenoma Size
<1cm 1.3% 0.5%1-2cm 9.5% 4.6%>2cm 46.0% 10.8%
Histologic Typetubular 4.8% 2.8%villotubular 22.5% 8.4%villous 40.7% 9.5%
Degree of dysplasiamild 5.7% 2.8%moderate 18.0% 8.4%severe 34.5% 9.5%
Percentage of containing cancer in adenoma
Muto T. Cancer 1975
Cumulative risk for cancer in 1cm adenoma
- 2.5% at 5 yrs, - 8% at 10 yrs, - 25% at 20 yrs
Carroll RLA Prev Med 1980
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 101
Incidence/mortality of CRC and screening uptake rates over time (US)
Source: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2014; 12:7-15 (DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2013.04.027 ) Copyright © 2014 AGA Institute
Winawer, S. J. et al. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1977-1981
Cumulative Incidence of Colorectal Cancer in the National Polyp Study Cohort
- 76 ~ 90 % reduction in cancer incidence -
102 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
• Two-stage polypectomy에서 조직 결과 불일치율: 15 – 30 %
• 대장 용종의 60 – 70 %가 선종: 결국 다수에서 용종제거 필요
• 미소대장암에서 겸자 생검이 조직 구조를 파괴하여 다음의EMR을 곤란하게 할 수 있다.
• Second-stage 에서 용종을 찾지 못하는 경우가 적지 않다.
:생검 결과가 암인데, 찾을 수 없다면 심각한 낭패
• One-stage polypectomy: 환자의 불편, 시간-경제적 손실 감소
One-stage polypectomy의 장점
용종의 최종 진단은 조직학적 검사 필요.
• 겸자 생검 후, 종양성 용종만 제거할 것인가?: Two-stage polypectomy
• 발견 즉시 제거할 것인가? : One-stage polypectomy
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 103
그렇다면, 용종을 모두 one-stage로 제거할 것인가?
Rex RK. et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy.Gastrointestinal endoscopy 63:4;S16 -S28: 2006
• Consistent referral of small “routine” colorectal polyps identified during diagnostic colonoscopy for repeat colonoscopy and polypectomy by others is unacceptable.
• Referral of technically difficult polyps to more experienced endoscopists for endoscopic resection is encouraged.
104 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Rectosigmoid area의 명백한 multiple hyperplastic Polyps
불필요한 용종 제거는 하지 말자
명백한 Inflammatory Polyps
불필요한 용종 제거는 하지 말자
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 105
내시경으로 제거해서는 안 되는 용종도 있다.
:내시경으로 완치 불가능한 악성 용종
• 림프절 전이
• 원격 전이
Biopsy only!
점막하층 암세포 대량 침윤-> 림프절 전이율 10 %
“점막하 대량 침윤이 강력히 의심되면, 내시경 절제하지 말자”
자신이 없으면 제거하지 말자 Biopsy only!
기술적 한계 : Endoscopist-dependent
• 절제가 어려운 위치에 있는 용종
:간만곡부 원위부 내측, 비만곡부 원위부 하방, 경사진 위치 등. -> 시야 확보 곤란, 올가미 접근 곤란
• 너무 큰 용종
• 편평형 또는 함몰형으로 완전 절제가 어려운 용종
: Two-stage polypectomy or Surgery
106 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Clinical Significance of Small Colorectal Polyps
High risk adenomas (Atkin et al. 1992. NEJM 326: 658)those containing >25 percent villous architecture, those with severe dysplasia, and those over 10 mm in size.
2,066 (49) 2,002 51 2
418 (67) 359 50 4
496 (77) 235 211 26
<6 4,381
6 - 10 666
>10 675
Total 5,722 2,980 (54) 2,596 312 32
2 (0.1)
1 (0.2)
21(4.2)
24 (0.8)
39
15
89
143
Neoplastic (%)
TA TVA VASize (mm)
n Cancer (% Neoplastic)
Severe dysplasia
4.4%
15.6%
100%
High Risk
Church JM 2004. Dis Colon Rectum 47:481
적어도선종은크기와상관없이제거하는것을권장.
Diminutive polyp (<5 mm)의 절제는 필요한가, 불필요한가?
Risk vs. Benefit
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 107
Independent risk factors for failed endotherapy
Feature Statistical association (n=479)Previous intervention OR: 3.75; 95% CI 1.77 to 7.94; p=0.001Ileocaecal valve involvement OR=3.38; 95% CI 1.20 to 9.52; p=0.021Difficult position OR=2.17; 95% CI 1.14 to 4.12; p=0.019Lesion size >40 mm OR=4.37; 95% CI 2.43 to 7.88; p<0.001Previous APC use OR=3.51; 95% CI 1.69 to 7.27; p=0.001
APC, argon plasma coagulation.
Rutter MD et al. British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctologists of Great Britain and Ireland guidelines for the management of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps. Gut. 2015; 64(12): 1847–1873. Moss A, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2011;140:1909–18.
• Endoscopic differential diagnosis for polyps has limitations• Tissue diagnosis is mandatory for confirmation• Symptomatic polyps should be removed.• Neoplastic polyps should be removed.• Asymptomatic, definite non-neoplastic polyps can be followed-up.• Removal of diminutive polyps: controversial ->cold biopsy or snaring• If prepared, one-stage polypectomy is desirable.• Malignant polyps that are highly suggestive of massive submucosal invasion
should be surgically removed. (Non-lifting sign)• Safe endoscopy skill provides wide range of management options.
(One-stage polypectomy, two-stage polypectomy, or surgery)
Summary: Tips for polyp treatment
108 2016 gastroenterology Winter School
Non-pedunculated colorectal polyps
Rutter MD et al. British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctologists of Great Britain and Ireland guidelinesfor the management of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps. Gut. 2015; 64(12): 1847–1873.
Major histopathological considerations in the management of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs).
Rutter MD et al. British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctologists of Great Britain and Ireland guidelinesfor the management of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps. Gut. 2015; 64(12): 1847–1873.
2016 gastroenterology Winter School 109
Endoscopic management
Rutter MD et al. British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctologists of Great Britain and Ireland guidelinesfor the management of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps. Gut. 2015; 64(12): 1847–1873.
110 2016 gastroenterology Winter School