durability in the uk mix design and specificationsncaupg/activities/2016...durability in the uk mix...
TRANSCRIPT
Durability in the UK Mix Design and Specifications 2016 NCAUPG Technical Conference, March 17-18, 2016 Indianapolis, IN
Daru Widyatmoko Technical Director, Pavement Design and Asset Management, Centre of Excellence for Asset Consultancy, Nottingham
March, 17 2016
1) Current practices
2) UK surfacing systems
3) Recent updates – case studies a) Next generation of asphalt surfacing b) Durability of preservative treatments
4) Concluding remarks
23 March, 2016 Presentation Title Page 2
Outline
– Standard route (harmonised EN, BS)
– Proprietary route (HAPAS, Highways Authority Product Approval Schemes) – Strategic Road Networks (SRN)
– Contract Documents and Specifications
– Performance related or guarantee?
Page 3
1) Current practices
(BBA) HAPAS (British Board of Agrément) Highways Authorities Product Approval Scheme
– Certification for proprietary products
– Asphalts and binders modified by polymers and other performance enhancing additives
– SG3 – Thin surface course systems
– SG4 – Modified binders
– Guidelines and certificates available on-line via www.bbacerts.co.uk
Main references
– Asphalt options: • European (harmonised) guides, eg: BS EN 13108 series • National guides, eg: BSI PD 6691 • (SRN) Proprietary products - HAPAS documents
– Installation requirements – national guides: • Laying - BS 594897 • Permanent works - SHW (August 2008), updates in 2016? • (SRN) Proprietary products - HAPAS documents
– Test methods: • European (harmonised) guides, eg: BS EN 12697 series • Current BS 598 series
BS EN 13108 – Bituminous Mixtures
Implemented since January 2008 Guidance on the use is detailed in BSI PD 6691
Reference to: • SHW Clause 900 and NG 900 Series • BS594897
Asphalt durability tests: according to EN
8
Wear Tests – simulative? CEN/TC227/WG1 – prCEN/TS 12697-50:2014
23 March, 2016 Page 9
– Asphalt materials are “live” products, subject to changes
– Resistance against degradation in service, due to changes in chemical-mechanical properties
– What causes these changes: • Thermal? Hot, cold, frost • Loss of volatile components? • Moisture? Winter maintenance?
Page 10
2) UK Surfacing System – Design for Durability
11
Balancing Act
Required Properties of Surfacing (UK Design Manual for Roads and Bridges)
– Durability
– Resistance to deformation
– Load spreading ability
– Texture depth
– Skidding resistance
– Low noise generation
– Layer adhesion
– Waterproofing
– Ease of laying
– Resistance to cracking
– Resistance to moisture damage
– Ride quality
Permitted Surfacing Options (UK Design Manual for Roads and Bridges)
– HAPAS – Bond coat
Current Test Methods – British Board of Agrèment HAPAS
14
LABORATORY
INSTALLED
23 March, 2016 Presentation Title Page 15
Requirements
23 March, 2016 Presentation Title Page 16
Update in 2016?
– Visual inspection, from 0, 12, 24 months
– Surface macrotexture, from 0, 12, 24 months
– In situ bond with substrate, early life
– Noise (if declared), between 12 – 24 months
– Air voids (if declared), up to 24 months
23 March, 2016 Page 17
Installation Trial – Performance Monitoring
– SHW Clause 942 – thin surface course system
– Visual condition during the first 2 years must be “Good”
– Free from fretting, ravelling, stripping and aggregate loss during the first 5 years
23 March, 2016 Page 18
Performance Guarantees
Performance Band Description Pass / Fail
criteria
Excellent No discernible fault Pass
Good No significant fault Pass
Suspect Seriously faulted Fail
Poor Requires remedial treatment
Fail
Bad
Requires immediate remedial treatment
Fail
Failures of Thin Asphalt Surfacing
19
Why treatment is required during <5 years?
Source: Neal ::0:::
Fretting, 61% Cracking, 35% Delamination, 4% Source: TRL Report 674 (2010)
Key requirements for durable surfacing
20
Source: J.C. Nicholls, “Permanent Potholes Repair”, Asphalt Professional No 60, 2014
A. Highways England/Mineral Product Associations/Eurobitume UK – research on durable thin surfacing (2015 – 2016)
B. Highways England/Defence Infrastructure/Associations of Directors for Economic, Environment, Planning and Transportation – research on asphalt preservative treatments (2010 – 2011, 2012 – 2013)
C. Highways England/Defence Infrastructure – research on durable surface treatments (antiskid/HFS/slurry surfacing) (2014 – 2015)
23 March, 2016 Page 21
3) Recent Updates
A – Research on durable thin surfacing (2015/2016) Developing the Clause 942 Thin Surface Course Replacement – more durable but retained good surface texture and low noise
Page 23
Desk Study – Collaborative Research
workmanship
Construction method
Traffic management
Joints
Impermeability Air voids
Dense
Macro texture
Specification
Mix design
QA/QC
Aggregate
Filler
Binder content
Quality
PMB, additives
Wet friction PSV
Case Studies & Feedbacks from: Australia – France – Germany – Netherland - New Zealand – England – Scotland – South Africa - USA
Binder
Layer thickness
Bond coat
Performance related criteria
Workshop – June 2015
– 6 Highways Authorities
– 10 major surfacing contractors (MPA)
– 4 major bitumen suppliers (Eurobitume UK)
– 3 research universities
– 10 major consultants
– 2 overseas – French and German designers
24
Summarised Concepts
25
Dual layer
Imprinted Texture
AC Surface
Market Additives
Blue Sky Additives
Modular/ Pre-fab
Coatings
Artificial Agg
Ease
of i
mpl
emen
tatio
n
Durability
Good Practice Applies to each Concept
– Better understanding of aggregate packing
– Improvements to mix design process
– Improving workmanship / operational upskilling / training
– Procurement and ‘risk sharing’ / investment in plant and equipment / visibility of programme
– Better feedback loop on performance
– Substrate condition
– Bond between layers
– Access / traffic management / full road closure – improved safety and joint workmanship / enable echelon paving
– Relationship with supply chain
– Temperature control (use of shuttle buggies)
26
Research on durable surfacing – progress to date
1. Two identified candidates – Next generation Hot Rolled Asphalt (HRA) – small size chipping – “Dual layer” premium asphalt surfacing – volumetric controls, AC-SMA?
2. Laboratory mix design trials – completed
3. Demonstration trial, planned for May
4. Other “parallel” works: – Binder spectroscopy at traffic speed – Volumetric assessment of installed thin surfacing – Simulative durability tests
27
– Benefits highlighted • Restore binder properties • Seal pavement from water ingress and oxidation • Improve durability by combination of the above
– Type of Pavement Preservation Materials • Sealers, to preserve and protect from further deterioration • Rejuvenators, as sealers but incorporate rejuvenating agent
B – Research on Preservative Treatments for Asphalt Surfacing
Questions
– Initial skid resistance?
– Reduction in permeability, how this may affect porous asphalt or PFC?
– Improve mechanical properties?
–Improve durability, resistance to age & moisture? – How long the “good” thing lasts? Is it effective?
– Acceptance criteria?
Further Questions
– Direct blending bitumen and preservative binder for lab test – does it represent what happens in situ?
– Initial softening (e.g. reduction in viscosity or increase in penetration) – is it a “good” thing?
– What kind of interaction is taking place initially and later in service?
– Representative sampling, top/bottom/middle?
– How long the “good” thing lasts? Is it effective?
What happens in practice?
23 March, 2016 Presentation Title Page 31
PPM
Surface course
Substrate
Diffusion? Slow process? f(time, temperature)?
23 March, 2016 Preservative Maintenance Page 33
Viscous to Elastic Transition (VET) Temperature (0.4Hz)
Samples for testing – laboratory
– Asphalt cores • Porous Asphalt/Friction Course
(PA/PFC) • Stone Mastic Asphalt (SMA) • Dense Asphalt Concrete
– Preservative materials: • Emulsion based - sealer • Solvent based - sealer • Emulsion based - rejuvenator
SATS – Saturated Ageing Tensile Stiffness
– Stiffness before SATS conditioning (ITSMu)
– Stiffness after SATS conditioning (ITSMc)
– Retained stiffness = 𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝑟𝑟 = 𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼
35
Modified condition: 0.5MPa, 85oC, 24 hours
The prefix AC, SMA and PFC denote asphalt concrete, stone mastic asphalt and porous friction course respectively The last two letters SS, ES, SR and ER denote solvent based sealer, emulsion based sealer, solvent based rejuvenator and emulsion based rejuvenator respectively.
Dense Semi-dense Porous
WAC leachate Asphalt Treatment Type Threshold Values
SS SS ES ER
WAC Inert Waste
WAC SNRHW and non-
hazardous deposited
in the same cell
WAC hazardous
waste
Limit of reporting
Co
ncu
lsio
ns
Inert waste result Less than inert
SNRHW result Less than SNRHW
WAC
Less than SNRHW
WAC
Hazardous waste Less than hazardous
Determined Values
WA
C D
eter
min
ed b
y L
each
ing
Arsenic 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.88 0.5 2 2.5 <0.1 Barium 1.2 1.2 0.89 51 20 100 300 <1 Cadmium 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 1 5 <0.02 Chromium 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.91 0.5 10 70 <0.1 Copper 1.0 0.9 1.1 4.1 2 50 100 <0.1 Mercury 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.02 0.01 0.2 2 <0.01 Molybdenum 0.1 0.1 0.1 3.2 0.5 10 30 <0.1 Nickel 0.23 0.13 0.15 8.3 0.4 10 40 <0.1 Lead 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.29 0.5 10 50 <0.1 Antimony 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.86 0.06 0.7 5 <0.02 Selenium 0.03 0.17 0.19 0.37 0.1 0.5 7 <0.02 Zinc 0.2 0.15 0.17 24.0 4 50 200 <1 Chloride 600 410 400 100 800 15000 25000 <1 Flouride 7.5 4.4 5.0 1.8 10 150 500 <3.5 Sulfate 850 994 816 110 1000 20000 50000 <200 Phenols 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 <1 Dissolve Organic Carbon 270 295 295 160 500 800 1000 <100 Total Dissolve Solids 3500 3816 3316 570 4000 60000 100000 <2
Notes Exceed Inert WAC Exceeds SNRHW
Note: SNRHW denotes stable non-reactive hazardous waste
SS, ES, SR and ER denote solvent based sealer, emulsion based sealer, solvent based rejuvenator and emulsion based rejuvenator respectively.
23 March, 2016 Page 37
Cook, J. 2015. Development of Maintenance Techniques and Specifications to Improve Performance, VFM and Sustainability of MOD Runways. 6th Global Airfield Engineering & Maintenance Summit, 9-10 September. London
– The binder ageing protocol is able to rapidly identify different PPM products by their ageing characteristics and indicates when re-treatment might be required.
– A suite of laboratory assessments which were carried out on highway and airfield materials before and after treated with different PPMs presented the benefits from applying the treatment at the correct application and frequencies.
– The effectiveness of these preservatives varies with each PPM type and the condition and type of asphalt surfacing which will receive the treatment.
23 March, 2016 Page 38
Summary of findings
a) Key to durability – complete circle & interdependent process, from specification, design, installation to in service performance
b) Durable surfacing system: requirement –v– practical challenges
c) “Fretting” on thin asphalt surfacing: good practices –v– design
d) Preservative treatment: sound screening –v– treatment plan
23 March, 2016 Page 39
4) Concluding Remarks
Disclaimers
– The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter and not necessarily those of the organisation he represents.
– The presented works and case studies were kindly supported by many parties and organisations; their contributions are gratefully acknowledged.
Thank You
[email protected] AECOM, Pavement Design and Asset Management, Centre of Excellence for Asset Consultancy
12 Regan Way, Chetwynd Business Park, Chilwell. Nottingham NG9 6RZ, United Kingdom
March, 2016