drs estudio comparativo sobre la fuerza de drag y downforce (equivalente de lift)
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Drs estudio comparativo sobre la fuerza de drag y downforce (equivalente de lift)](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559d33f91a28abfd6a8b46dc/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Universidad San Francisco de Quito
Aerodinámica
Erik Proaño
![Page 2: Drs estudio comparativo sobre la fuerza de drag y downforce (equivalente de lift)](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559d33f91a28abfd6a8b46dc/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Marco Teórico
![Page 3: Drs estudio comparativo sobre la fuerza de drag y downforce (equivalente de lift)](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559d33f91a28abfd6a8b46dc/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: Drs estudio comparativo sobre la fuerza de drag y downforce (equivalente de lift)](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559d33f91a28abfd6a8b46dc/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: Drs estudio comparativo sobre la fuerza de drag y downforce (equivalente de lift)](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559d33f91a28abfd6a8b46dc/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: Drs estudio comparativo sobre la fuerza de drag y downforce (equivalente de lift)](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559d33f91a28abfd6a8b46dc/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
![Page 7: Drs estudio comparativo sobre la fuerza de drag y downforce (equivalente de lift)](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559d33f91a28abfd6a8b46dc/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Alerón Trasero (DRS desactivado)
![Page 8: Drs estudio comparativo sobre la fuerza de drag y downforce (equivalente de lift)](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559d33f91a28abfd6a8b46dc/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Superficies
![Page 9: Drs estudio comparativo sobre la fuerza de drag y downforce (equivalente de lift)](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559d33f91a28abfd6a8b46dc/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Streamlines
![Page 10: Drs estudio comparativo sobre la fuerza de drag y downforce (equivalente de lift)](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559d33f91a28abfd6a8b46dc/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Campo Vectorial de Velocidades
![Page 11: Drs estudio comparativo sobre la fuerza de drag y downforce (equivalente de lift)](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559d33f91a28abfd6a8b46dc/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
![Page 12: Drs estudio comparativo sobre la fuerza de drag y downforce (equivalente de lift)](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559d33f91a28abfd6a8b46dc/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Pressure Coutour
![Page 13: Drs estudio comparativo sobre la fuerza de drag y downforce (equivalente de lift)](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559d33f91a28abfd6a8b46dc/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
𝐿𝑖𝑓𝑡 = −6172,68202 [ 𝑁 𝑚]
𝐷𝑟𝑎𝑔 = 8358,291163 [ 𝑁 𝑚]𝑀𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑖𝑙 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟 = 1069,92881 [𝑁]
𝑀𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑖 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟 = 666,98191[𝑁]
Lift to Drag ratio
𝐿 𝐷 = 0,73851
Cálculos
![Page 14: Drs estudio comparativo sobre la fuerza de drag y downforce (equivalente de lift)](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559d33f91a28abfd6a8b46dc/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Alerón Trasero (DRS activado)
![Page 15: Drs estudio comparativo sobre la fuerza de drag y downforce (equivalente de lift)](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559d33f91a28abfd6a8b46dc/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Superficies
![Page 16: Drs estudio comparativo sobre la fuerza de drag y downforce (equivalente de lift)](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559d33f91a28abfd6a8b46dc/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Streamlines
![Page 17: Drs estudio comparativo sobre la fuerza de drag y downforce (equivalente de lift)](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559d33f91a28abfd6a8b46dc/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Campo Vectorial de Velocidades
![Page 18: Drs estudio comparativo sobre la fuerza de drag y downforce (equivalente de lift)](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559d33f91a28abfd6a8b46dc/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: Drs estudio comparativo sobre la fuerza de drag y downforce (equivalente de lift)](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559d33f91a28abfd6a8b46dc/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Pressure Coutour
![Page 20: Drs estudio comparativo sobre la fuerza de drag y downforce (equivalente de lift)](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559d33f91a28abfd6a8b46dc/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
𝐿𝑖𝑓𝑡 = −3100,25735 [ 𝑁 𝑚]
𝐷𝑟𝑎𝑔 = 3686,293587 [ 𝑁 𝑚]𝑀𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑖𝑙 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟 = 409,81225 [𝑁]
𝑀𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑖 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟 = 311,90727[𝑁]
Lift to Drag ratio
𝐿 𝐷 = 0,841023
Cálculos
![Page 21: Drs estudio comparativo sobre la fuerza de drag y downforce (equivalente de lift)](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070323/559d33f91a28abfd6a8b46dc/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Abbott, I., & Von Doenhoff, A. (1959). Theory of Wing Sections. New York: Dover Publications.
Anderson, D. (2010).Fundamentals of Aerodynamics. Maryland .McGraw Hill.
White, F. (2008). Fluid Mechanics (6th ed.). Rhode Island: McGraw Hill.
Referencias