drp-104, a novel broad acting glutamine antagonist, induces … · 2020-03-20 · antigen...
TRANSCRIPT
****
* ** **
****** *** *** **
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700
1000
2000
3000
Days post the start of treatment
Tum
or S
ize
(mm
3 )
Vehicle Anti-PD-L1DRP-104 1.4 mg/kgDRP-104 Anti-PD-L1+DRP-104 1.4 mg/kgDRP-104 0.7 mg/kgAnti-PD-L1+DRP104 0.7 mg/kg
** **
****
****** *** ***
Vehicle o.5 hr 4 hr 24 hr0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
Glu
tam
ate/
Glu
tam
ine
Glutamate/Glutamine_single dose
DRP-104 0.5 mg/kg
*
Figure 5. CT26 cells were inoculated s.c. in BALB/c mice. When tumor size reached ~400 mm3, mice were treated withDRP-104 (0.5 mg/kg) or vehicle s.c., q.d. for 5 days and/or anti-PD-1 Ab (10 mg/kg) at day1 and 4. Phenotypic analysesof tumor infiltrating immune cells and tumor cells were performed by flow cytometry. Data indicate mean+/- SEM. *:p<0.05; ***: p<0.001; ***: p<0.0001.M1 polarized TAM and decreased MDSCs were only observed in DRP-104 treated tumors.
Glutamine is a conditionally essential amino acid for rapidly proliferating cancer cells, thus depriving the same fuel from immune cells and contributing to tumor immune evasion. DRP-104 was designed as a novel prodrug of the broad acting glutamine antagonist 6-Diazo-5-oxo-L-norleucine (DON). DRP-104 is inert in its prodrug form, affords high levels of plasma and gastro-intestinal (GI) tissue stability; has high tumor cell permeability and preferential tumor versus plasma/GI tissue distribution for DON. Here we sought to (1) compare immunological modulation of DRP-104 to anti-PD-1Ab, and (2) evaluate the combination effect of DRP-104 with PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors.DRP-104 treatment in CT26 mouse colon carcinoma model showed broad immune cell modulation effects including increased T, NK, and macrophages; while anti-PD-1Ab affected mainly CD8+T cells. Cytokine modulation in tumor and plasma revealed that DRP-104 decreased pro-tumorigenic cytokines such as VEGF and KC(IL-8) while anti-PD-1Ab showed either no change or slight increase in these cytokines. CT26 bearing mice treated with anti-PD-1Ab alone, DRP-104, and the combination showed tumor growth inhibition at day 12 of 48%, 90%, and 94%, respectively. Median survival days were 31.5, 36, and 56 days, respectively (vehicle; 17.5 days). Notably 9 mice treated with combination of anti-PD-1 with DRP-104 were tumor free at end of the experiment (day 77) and 100% of these mice rejected a CT26 tumor re-challenge. In the H22 HCC cancer model, mice were treated with either anti-PD-L1 Ab, DRP-104, or combination. While anti-PD-L1Ab did not show tumor growth inhibition in this model, DRP-104 significantly inhibited tumor growth and the combination further enhanced efficacy, illustrated by extended survival for both DRP-104 alone (50 days) and combination (96 days) treatment groups compared to vehicle (33 days) and anti-PD-L1 alone (33 days). Combination treatment also resulted in long term durable cures in 50% of the mice.
DRP-104, A Novel Broad Acting Glutamine Antagonist, Induces Distinctive Immune Modulation Mechanisms and Synergistic Efficacy in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Blockade
Yumi Yokoyama, Ph.D., Michael Nedelcovych, Ph.D. and Robert Wild, Ph.D.Dracen Pharmaceuticals Inc., 780 Third Ave, 45th Floor, New York, NY 10017
Summary
Background
ConclusionsvBoth DRP-104 and the active form DON showed Glutamine dependent inhibition
of in vitro cancer cell growth (poster P816: Sat, Nov 9, 7:00am – 8:30pm).vDRP-104 achieved 6x tumor/plasma ratio for DON in CES-1 ko mice (poster P816:
Sat, Nov 9, 7:00am – 8:30pm).vDRP-104 treatment showed dramatic immuno-oncology and metabolism related
gene modulations.vImmuno-phenotypical analysis showed that DRP-104 induced substantial and
broad changes in various immune cell infiltrates, such as increased TIL, T, NK and NKT cells, whereas an effect of anti-PD-1 Ab was limited to CD8+T cells. DRP-104 also polarized TAMs to M1 phenotype, and decreased immunosuppressive mMDSC in the TME.
vPro-tumorigenic proteins, such as VEGF, KC (IL-8), MCP-1, LIF and IL-6 were decreased by DRP-104. Combination showed significant increase in IFN-g in TME.
vFinally DRP-104 inhibited tumor growth as a single agent in CT26 and H22 tumor models which are non-responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Combination with either anti-PD-1 Ab or anti-PD-L1 Ab enhanced efficacy and achieved significantly extended survival.
vThis data support clinical development of DRP-104 in combination with anti-PD-1 Ab or anti-PD-L1 Ab immune checkpoint inhibitors including settings of non-response to IO therapies.
DRP-104 Single Administration Yields Time-Dependent Changes in Plasma Glutamine Metabolites
Figure 2. MC38 tumor bearing animals were dosed s.c. with DRP-104 0.5 mg/kg, and tumors were obtained at the indicated time after dosing. Glutamate/Glutamine in plasma was measured by Glutamine/Glutamate Glo Assay (Promega).Significant time-dependent changes in plasma Glutamate/Glutamine levels were observed linking DRP-104 treatment to target engagement. Data indicate mean+/- SEM. *: p<0.05
DRP-104 Treatment In Vivo Results in Dramatic Modulation of Multiple Relevant Tumor and Immune Cell Scores as Measured by NanostringIO360 and Metabolism Panels
Undirected Groups: differential expression in
DRB T1 vs. baseline of DRB V
Costimulatory Signaling 8.923
Myeloid Compartment 8.494
Antigen Presentation 8.473
Immune Cell Adhesion and Migration 8.326
Lymphoid Compartment 7.944
Cytokine and Chemokine Signaling 7.394
Hypoxia 7.372
JAK-STAT Signaling 7.268
Interferon Signaling 7.024
Cytotoxicity 6.699
NF-kappaB Signaling 6.577
PI3K-Akt 6.44
TGF-beta Signaling 6.272
Metabolic Stress 6.107
Matrix Remodeling and Metastasis 5.869
MAPK 5.835
Autophagy 5.6
Epigenetic Regulation 5.335
Wnt Signaling 5.001
Apoptosis 4.905
Hedgehog Signaling 4.863
Angiogenesis 4.527
Notch Signaling 4.51
Cell Proliferation 4.134
DNA Damage Repair 3.966
IO360 (Tumor) Metabolism (Tumor)
Figure 3. MC38 cells were inoculated s.c. in C57BL/6 mice. When tumor size reached ~400 mm3, mice were treatedwith DRP-104 (0.5 mg/kg) or vehicle s.c., q.d. for 5 days. mRNA was extracted from tumors and analyzed byNanostring IO360 Panel. ****: p<0.0001DRP-104 treatment was associated with dramatic modulation of multiple relevant tumor and immune cell scoressuggesting direct anti-tumor effects while stimulating immune cell function.
IO360 (Tumor)
IO360 (Tumor)
DRP-104 Treatment Shows Distinct Immuno-phenotypic Changes Compared to anti-PD-1 in the MC38 Syngeneic Model (TIL, Lymphocyte)
0 1 2 3 40
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Days after treatment
Tu
mo
r V
olu
me (
mm
3)
Vehicle 10 ml/kg s.c. QDx5
* **
DRP-104 0.5mg/kg s.c. QDx5
DRP-104 1.4mg/kg s.c. QDx5
DRP-104+anti-PD-1
Figure 4. CT26 cells were inoculated s.c. in BALB/c mice. When tumor size reached ~400 mm3, mice were treated withDRP-104 (0.5 mg/kg) or vehicle s.c., q.d. for 5 days and/or anti-PD-1 Ab (10mg/kg) at day1 and 4. Phenotypic analysesof tumor infiltrating immune cells and tumor cells were performed by flow cytometry. *: p<0.05; ***: p<0.001; ***:p<0.0001. Distinct immunological modulation by DRP-104 and anti-PD-1 Ab was observed.
CT265x105cells/mouse
Tumor Size(~400mm3)
Harvest 1hr after the last dosing• Immuno-phenotyping (tumor)• Plasma for Luminex
Anti-PD-1DRP-104
Tumor Growth Inhibition
Vehicl
e
DRP-104
anti-P
D-1
DRP-104+
anti-P
D-10
10
20
30
40
TIL
(CD4
5+%
in L
ive
cells
) ***
*
TIL CD8+T
Vehicl
e
DRP-104
anti-P
D-1
DRP-104+
anti-P
D-10
2
4
6
8
10
CD8+ T
cel
l (%
in C
D45+ c
ells
)
** **** **
NK Cell
CD4+T
Vehicl
e
DRP-104_
0.5
anti-P
D-1
DRP-104+
anti-P
D-10
2
4
6
8
10
CD4+ T
cel
l (%
in C
D45+ c
ells
)
** **
Vehicl
e
DRP-104
anti-P
D-1
DRP-104+
anti-P
D-10
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
Ki67
in C
D8+
cell
(MFI
)
**
Vehicl
e
DRP-104
anti-P
D-1
DRP-104+
anti-P
D-10
10000
20000
30000
Ki67
in C
D4+
cell
(MFI
)
******
Vehicl
e
DRP-104
anti-P
D-1
DRP-104+
anti-P
D-10
1
2
3
4
5
NK c
ell (
% in
CD4
5+ cel
ls)
Vehicl
e
DRP-104
anti-P
D-1
DRP-104+
anti-P
D-10
10000
20000
30000
40000
Ki67
in N
K cel
l (M
FI)
**
**
Proliferation
CD8+T CD4+T NK Cell
NKT Cell
Vehicl
e
DRP-104
anti-P
D-1
DRP-104+
anti-P
D-10.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
NKT
cell
(% in
CD4
5+ cel
l)
**
***
TAM M1 Macrophage
gMDSC+Neutrophil mMDSC
Vehicl
e
DRP-104
_0.5
anti-
PD-1
DRP-104
+anti-
PD-10
20
40
60
80
100
Mac
roph
age
(% in
CD
45+
cells
)
** *
**
Vehicl
e
DRP-104
anti-P
D-1
DRP-104+
anti-P
D-10
50
100
M1
(MH
C II
+ CD
206- )
Mac
roph
age
(%)
******* ***
*
Vehicl
e
DRP-104
_0.5
anti-
PD-1
DRP-104
+anti-
PD-10
2
4
6
8
gMD
SC
+Neu
trop
hil
(% in
CD
45+
cells
)
Vehicl
e
DRP-104
anti-P
D-1
DRP-104+
anti-P
D-10
10
20
30
40
mM
DSC
(% in
CD
45+ c
ells
)
** *****
DRP-104 Showed Distinctive Modulation of In Vivo Cytokines in TME Compared to Anti-PD-1 Ab
Vehicl
e
DRP-104
anti-P
D-1
DRP-104+
anti-P
D-10
2
4
6
IFN
-g (p
g/m
g)
IFN-g*
Vehicl
e
DRP-104
anti-P
D-1
DRP-104+
anti-P
D-10
5
10
15
IL6
(pg/
mg)
IL6
*
Vehicl
e
DRP-104_
0.5
anti-P
D-1
DRP-104+
anti-P
D-10
50
100
150
200
KC
(pg/
mg)
KC*
Vehicl
e
DRP-104_
0.5
anti-P
D-1
DRP-104+
anti-P
D-10
50
100
150
200
250
MC
P-1
(pg/
mg)
MCP-1**
Vehicl
e
DRP-104
anti-P
D-1
DRP-104+
anti-P
D-10.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.03.54.0
IL1b
(pg/
ml)
IL-1b
Vehicl
e
DRP-104
anti-P
D-1
DRP-104+
anti-P
D-10.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
IL2
(pg/
mg)
IL2
Vehicl
e
DRP-104
anti-P
D-1
DRP-104+
anti-P
D-10
2
4
6
8
LIF
(pg/
mg)
LIF
**
Vehicl
e
DRP-104
anti-P
D-1
DRP-104+
anti-P
D-10
5
10
15
20
25
VEG
F (p
g/m
g)
VEGF*
Figure 6. Cytokines in tumor lysates from CT26 study were measured by Luminex. Data indicate mean+/- SEM. *:p<0.05; **: p<0.01.Distinct immunological modulation by DRP-104 and anti-PD-1 Ab and enhanced IFN-g production in combination wasobserved.
Combination of DRP-104 with Anti-PD-1 Ab Enhanced Anti-Tumor Efficacy and Survival in CT26 Colon Cancer Model
***
*
**
**0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Days post the start of treatment
Tum
or v
olum
e (m
m3 )
Vehicle q.d.x28, s.c.
Group2:anti-PD-1Ab 10 mg/kg, q4dx8, i.p.
Group3: DRP-104 1.4mg/kg 5-days ON 2-days OFF x 4 cycles, s.c.
Group4:DRP-104 1.4mg/kg 5-days ON 2-days OFF x 4 cycles, s.c. + anti-PD-1Ab 10 mpk q4d x 8, i.p.
Group5: DRP-104 0.5mg/kg 5-days ON 2-days OFF x 4 cycles, s.c.
Group6: DRP-104 0.5mg/kg 5-days ON 2-days OFF x 4 cycles, s.c. + anti-PD-1Ab 10 mpk q4d x 8, i.p.
***** ** ******
** ******* ***
*****
9 Cures and 8 naïve mice re-
challenged with CT26
without additional treatment
Re-challenge
Combination of DRP-104 with Anti-PD-L1 Ab Enhanced Anti-Tumor Efficacy and Survival in the H22 HCC Cancer Model
Figure 8. H22 mouse hepatocellular carcinoma cells were inoculated s.c. in BALB/c mice. When tumor size reached 50-100 mm3, mice were randomized and treated with DRP-104, anti-PD-L1Ab, or DRP-104/anti-PD-L1Ab combination. Anti-PD-1Ab did not show any effect in this model, while DRP-104 alone showed potent single agent efficacy and combination with anti-PD-L1 Ab further inhibited tumor growth and significantly improved OS and long term durable cures.(Mean+/- SEM. n=10, *: p<0.05, **: p<0.01, ***: p<0.001)
DRP-104 Treatment Shows Distinct Immuno-Phenotypic Changes Compared to Anti-PD-1 Ab in the CT26 Syngeneic Model (TIL, Lymphocyte)
DRP-104 Treatment Shows Distinct Immuno-Phenotypic Changes Compared to Anti-PD-1 Ab in the CT26 Syngeneic Model (Macrophage and Tumor)
0 20 40 60 800
20
40
60
80
100
Days post the start of treatment
Per
cent
sur
viva
l
**********
****
****
497
Dracen’s Glutamine Antagonist, DRP-104, Preferentially Delivers DON to Tumors Leading to Broad Glutamine Pathway Inhibition
Figure 1. A. DRP-104 is a prodrug of the broad acting glutamine antagonist DON (6-Diazo-5-oxo-L-norleucine). DRP-104 is inactive in its prodrug form with high plasma and GI tissue stability. DRP-104 is preferentially distributed in tumors where it is biotransformed and activated to the active moiety DON. B. Glutamine dependent pathways inhibited by DON. Enzymes targeted by DON are shown in blue bold letters.
Figure 7. CT26 mouse colon carcinoma cells were inoculated s.c. in BALB/c mice. When tumor size reached 50-100 mm3, mice were randomized and treated with DRP-104, anti-PD-1Ab, or DRP-104/anti-PD-1Ab combination. Anti-PD-1Ab showed marginal effect, while DRP-104 alone showed potent single agent efficacy and combination with anti-PD-1 Ab further inhibit tumor growth and significantly improved OS and long term durable cures (p<0.001 vs monotherapy).(Mean+/- SEM. n=10, **: p<0.01; ***: p<0.001; ****: p<0.0001). Cured animals from the combination group were re-challenged with CT26 tumor cells. 100% of the mice rejected the tumor implant suggesting potential long term immune memory response elicited by DRP-104 and PD-1 combination treatment.
A B
Vehicle DRP-104-4
-2
0
2
4
Cytotoxicity
Cyt
otox
icity
Sco
re
Vehicle DRP-104-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
Metabolic Stress
Met
abol
ic S
tres
s S
core
Vehicle DRP-104-4
-2
0
2
4
Apoptosis
Apo
ptos
is S
core
Vehicle DRP-104-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
Cell Proliferation
Cel
l Pro
lifer
atio
n S
core
Vehicle DRP-104-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
Antigen Presentation
Ant
igen
Pre
sent
atio
n S
core
********
****
******** ****
Vehicle DRP-104-10
-5
0
5
10
Cytokine and Chemokine Signaling
Cyt
okin
e an
d C
hem
okin
e S
core
Treatment (Vehicle or DRP-104, 0.5 mg/kg, q.d.x5)
MC382x105cells/mouse
Tumor Size(~400mm3)
Harvest 1hr after the last dosing• Nanostring analysis (tumor)
0 20 40 60 80 1000
20
40
60
80
100
Days
Perc
ent s
urvi
val
***
***
****
VehicleDRP-104, 0.5 mg/kg, s.c. q.d.x5Anti-PD-1 Ab 10 mg/kg, i.p., q4dx2DRP-104+Anti-PD-1 Ab