drivecam ® program march 15, 2011. outline overview of drivecam fleet overview chronology of...
TRANSCRIPT
DriveCam®
Program
March 15, 2011
Outline
• Overview of DriveCam
• Fleet Overview
• Chronology of Program
• Coaching Outcomes
• Financial Outcomes
• Case Studies
• Summary
Outline
• Overview of DriveCam
• Fleet Overview
• Chronology of Program
• Coaching Outcomes
• Financial Outcomes
• Case Studies
• Summary
Overview of DriveCam
• A vehicle is equipped with a DriveCam.
• DriveCam recorder only “saves” recording when triggered by a G-Force event.
• DriveCam staff reviews each video recording for safety violations, violations of statute, or violation of Orange County Administrative Rules and Regulations
Overview of DriveCam
• Department/Division designated “coaches” meet with employees to show them their actions and develop solutions to improve their driving behaviors
• If violations are severe or chronic, the department/division disciplines the employee in accordance with County policy
Outline
• Overview of DriveCam
• Fleet Overview
• Chronology of Program
• Coaching Outcomes
• Financial Outcomes
• Case Studies
• Summary
Fleet Overview
Orange County Vehicle Inventory
1433
419
164
Non-CommercialVehicles
Commercial Vehicles
Fire & RescueVehicles
Fleet Overview
DriveCam Allocation by Vehicle Type
403
224
153Non-CommercialVehicles
Commercial Vehicles
Fire & RescueVehicles
Fleet Overview
Criteria for Vehicle Selection
• Emergency Response Vehicles
• High Risk Vehicles
• High Mileage Vehicles
• Take Home Vehicles
• Do not allocate to pool vehicles
Outline
• Overview of DriveCam
• Fleet Overview
• Chronology of Program
• Coaching Outcomes
• Financial Outcomes
• Case Studies
• Summary
Chronology of Program
• 5/2007-8/2007 Pilot program conducted with 30 vehicles
• Sept 2007 Board of County Commissioners approvesimplementation of program to include 750 DriveCam units installed over three (3) years
• March 2008 250 DriveCam units installed• December 2008 250 DriveCam units installed (530 total
units in use Countywide)• October 2009 Final 250 DriveCam units installed• January 2011 Fire and Rescue begins using Fleet
Management system to track Fire Marshall and Logistics vehicles
Outline
• Overview of DriveCam
• Fleet Overview
• DriveCam Review
• Chronology of Program
• Coaching Outcomes
• Case Studies
• Financial Outcomes
• Summary
Coaching Outcomes
Top 5 Monthly Coachable Incidents
1. Following too Close 55 per month
2. Failure to Scan Roadway 30 per month
3. Rolling Stop 25 per month
4. Stop Sign/Red Light Violations 20 per month
5. Cellphone Use while Driving 6 per month
Outline
• Overview of DriveCam
• Fleet Overview
• Chronology of Program
• Coaching Outcomes
• Financial Outcomes
• Case Studies
• Summary
Financial Outcomes
Historical Automobile Liability Costs
*FY 08-09 includes $200,000 loss from vehicle not equipped with Drivecam
Total Incurred Cost
$0$100,000$200,000$300,000$400,000$500,000$600,000$700,000$800,000$900,000
FY03-04
FY04-05
FY05-06
FY06-07
FY07-08
FY08-09
FY09-10
Financial Outcomes
Historical Automobile Liability Frequency
Annual Number of Claims
050
100150200250300350400
Financial Outcomes
Return on Investment
• DRIVE CAM has a GSA contract
• Under contract County has paid $1.13 mil for equipment, licenses, and maintenance
• Total savings under the program is 1.19 mil*
• Annual cost of Managed Services and Licenses is $152,000
*Average Annual Cost of $700,000per year prior to Drive Cam. Savingsdo not include reduction in workers compensation claims or maintenance costs
Outline
• Overview of DriveCam
• Fleet Overview
• Chronology of Program
• Coaching Outcomes
• Financial Outcomes
• Case Studies
• Summary
Dangerous Behaviors
Dangerous Behaviors
Policy Violations
Policy Violations
Accidents
Exonerations
Exonerations
Outline
• Overview of DriveCam
• Fleet Overview
• Chronology of Program
• Coaching Outcomes
• Financial Outcomes
• Case Studies
• Summary
Orange County Program Summary
• Coaching of drivers significantly improved their drivingbehaviors as indicated by the 60% reduction in “coachable”behaviors
• Safety violations are being handled as any other employee safety procedure violations
• There has been a reduction of 76% in the frequency ofautomobile accidents.
• There has a been a reduction of 81% in the severity of automobile accidents since implementation of DriveCam.
DriveCam®
Program
March 15, 2011