dredging contracts - htg-online · rotterdam’sworld-class port. ... por position bcg matrix: dog,...
TRANSCRIPT
Alleen tekst
Dredging Contracts
Contents:
1. Short introduction to the Port of Rotterdam
2. Asset Management
3. Basic dredging capacity vs. peak demands
4. Marketing and type of contract-choices
5. Risk-distribution
6. Performance measurement
7. Sustainability in dredging contracts
1 maart 2017|2
Afbeelding (XL)
Port development
1400 - 1800
1800 - 1900
1906 - 1922
1934 - 1946
1929 - 1949
1948 - 1957
1960 - 1970
1970 - 2008
2008 - 2030
1 maart 2017|4
Tekst + afbeelding (S)
Port in figures
Port of Rotterdam engine of the economy
• Total port area 12,500 ha (net 6,000 ha)
• Total employment 180,000 people
• Total added value € 21 billion (3.2% GNP)
• 3,000 companies
• Largest port in Europe, 8th port worldwide
• Throughput approx. 465 million tons;12 million TEU (containers)
• Depth up to 75 ft (= 24 m)
1 maart 2017|5
Employment
Object (XL)
Top 20 world ports
1 maart 2017|6
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
x 1 million tons (2015) Source: Port Authorities
Afbeelding (XXL) + Tekstkader (Linksboven)
26 november 2015|8
Mission:
The Port of Rotterdam Authority createseconomic and social value by workingtogether with clients and stakeholders on the realisation of sustainable growth in Rotterdam’s world-class port.
Alleen tekst
Asset Management
• A management paradigm and a body of management practices
• That is applied to the entire portfolio of assets at all levels of the organization
• That seeks to minimize the total cost of acquiring, operating, maintaining and renewing the assets
• Within an environment of limited resources
• While continuously delivering the service levels customers desire and regulators require
• At an acceptable level of business risk to the organization.
1 maart 2017|9
Object (XL)
Asset Management
1 maart 2017|10
• Expected/agreed Performance
• Acceptable Costs
• Without predicted Risks
Tekst + afbeelding (S)
Sedimentation: a natural process
Is a result of natural and therefore unpredictable process
Occurs at low current velocity
Typical for fluvial delta’s
Influx of marine sediments from tidal pumping, storms
Sedimentation takes place in almost every port
Object (XL)
Basic dredging capacity vs. peak demands
1 maart 2017|13
0
2.000.000
4.000.000
6.000.000
8.000.000
10.000.000
12.000.000
19
82
19
83
19
84
19
85
19
86
19
87
19
88
19
89
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
Totaal Regio's
Maasvlakte
Europoort
Botlek
Pernis
Fruitport
Eem-Waalhaven
Stadshavens
2e Maasvlakte
Dordrecht
Annually dredged quantities 1982 - 2016
Object (XL)
Basic dredging capacity vs. peak demands
1 maart 2017|14
-
50.000
100.000
150.000
200.000
250.000
300.000
350.000
400.000
450.000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52
Weekly dredged volume
m³ volume
Average
Alleen tekst
Basic dredging capacity vs. peak demands
1 maart 2017|15
• Basic dredging capacity:
• Long-year contract for minimum demand (> 3-5 years)
• When possible divide in different lots for different contractors
• Keep possibilities for additional works open
• Flexible shell:
• Use long-term contractor(s) for extra deployment (first refusal)
• Framework contracts with fixed hourly rates
• Framework contracts for additional equipment (plough, wid, cranes, barges)
Alleen tekst
Basic dredging capacity vs. peak demands
1 maart 2017|16
Basic capacity contract:
• When tendering:
• Define mimimum purchase level (amounts guaranteed)
• Share historical information about annual quantities
• Set demands for “quick response time” (incident management)
• Imply the right of first refusal in case of extra demands
• After granting:
• Agree on basic deployment schedule (allowing for mutual flexibility)
• Set up an “early-warning” and alternative deployment
• Agree on process for first refusal
Tekst + afbeelding (S)
Marketing: Supply profile
Total marketvolume worldwide €11 billion, Europe €1,8 billion
Active on (Western-European) Dutch market:
2 large Dutch parties (Boskalis, Van Oord): strong international focus (90% of turnover abroad). Large
fleet with both large and smaller dredgers. PoR position BCG matrix: dog, but interesting because of
image, spin-off, and home-market
2 large Belgian parties (J. de Nul, DEME):. strong international focus, limited activities in Dutch market.
Large fleet with both large and smaller dredgers. PoR-position BCG matrix: dog, not a lot of competitive
offers
2 smaller Dutch parties (vd Kamp, Dutch Dredging) limited fleet of smaller dredgers. PoR-positie BCG
matrix: cash cow
Outsiders: Danish company Rohde Nielsen fleet of smaller to medium-sized dredgers, and Van den
Herik (NL) 2 smaller dredgers
Market Characteristics:
Homogeneous oligopoly: limited number of suppliers with an equivalent product
Limited number of clients: (port) authorities) like Rijkswaterstaat, other seaports, water-controlboards
Motivations of suppliers:
Maximization of occupancy
Combining different contracts (flexibility in project-planning is important)
Tabel markt & BCG
Bedrijf Omzet 2013 Omzet 2012 Werknemers FTE 2013
Winst 2013 Winst 2012
Boskalis (NL) € 3,5 miljard € 3,1 miljard 13.832 € 366 mln. € 250 mln.
Van Oord (NL)
€ 1,641 miljard
€ 1,715 miljard
4.195 € 130 mln. € 118 mln.
Jan De Nul (B)
€ 2,124 miljard
€ 2,114 miljard
6.173 € 123 mln. € 116 mln.
Van der Kamp (NL)
DEME (B) € 2,53 miljard
€ 1,92 miljard
+/- 4500 € 109,1 mln. € 89,43 mln.
De Boer (NL) € 60-70 mln.
Rohde Nielsen (DK)
€ 113,5 mln. 137,0 mln. 37 € 5,8 mln. € 10,5 mln.
Tekst + afbeelding (S)
Marketing: Demand profile
Continuous demand
Large area, with high annual quantities
Combined demand with RWS for larger marketshare
Payment method “ex-situ” (i.e. in means of transport)
Guaranteed minimal workload (working-hours)
Client with good facilities, contractmanagement, ICT-tooling, Dredging Desk, hydrographic capacity
Combined with sandmining
Flexible demand
Dynamic area, with unpredictable sedimentation-patterns
Need for quick actions/response-times
Different types of dredgers needed (grabs, bed-levellers)
Framework contract for on-the-spot demands
Tekst + afbeelding (S)
Marketing: Kraljic and strategy
Kraljic strategic quadrant, this theory gives options for strategy:
a) Reduction of demand
D.IY.;
Researching for different product specifications (maintenance concepts)
Develop alternative suppliers
b) Intensify cooperation with suppliers
Long-term contracts
Develop common programs with supplier
c) Cooperate with other clients to increase puchasing power.
Kraljic matrix
Tekst + afbeelding (S)
Marketing: Lessons learned
From maintenance contracts:
Freedom in planning/ combining other contracts is very important for contractor
Advantage sitting contractor: proper knowledge of area also an important factor for contractor
Negotiating terms can be profitable for both parties
Allocate risks very carefully.
From projectcontracts (capital dredging)
Clear terms about survey methods, including presentation and payment
Clear terms about tolerances, interfaces with other works/area’s
Small projects
Reserve “flexibilty” in contract (and execution-period) for smaller extra projects
Methodiek Category plan
Richting voor Category plan
Leerpunten: plannings-
vrijheid, kennisdeling, samenwerking
Kraljic: afbouwen
behoefte en partnering
HbR inkoop-strategie:
Partnering en
flexibiliteit
Alleen tekst
Marketing: recommendations
Basic capacity
Intensify cooperation with RWS and projects dpt.
• Share knowledge about market, area, defenitions, execution methods etc.
• Work together on sharing supervision, planning, tooling, etc.
• Better understanding of each other’s interests
Tender for long term contract(s), to ensure continuous supply with flexibilty
• Allow for contractpartner to rely on “agreed flexibilty” vs. Response-time
• Collect and secure knowledge of total port-industrial area
• Consider setting up a “market-place” for flexible demands
Framework contract for additional dredging
• Shorter tendering-phases, possiblity to negociate, no “Alcatel”
• Apply for smaller modification works, or peak sedimentation
• Quick, flexible deployment because of pre-concluded contract, based on fixed tariffs.
Tekst + Object (S)
Risk management
Client Contractor Cost impact
•Siltation quantitiesX €€€€€
•Siltation ratesX €€
•Soil typeX €€€
•Sediment quality (contamination)X €€
•Infrastructural modificationsX €
•Sailing distanceX €€
•Production ratesX €€€€
•Efficient dredger typesX €€
•Availability for Maintenance/Response timeX €
•Traffic intensitiesX €
Alleen tekst
Risk management
Choice for best contract types based on:
• Putting the risks with the party that is best equipped to manage/mitigate them
• Compliancy with strategic vision of port authority, e.g. responsibility for contractual depths
• Organizational know-how of contractmanagement
• Organizational manpower for contractmanagement
• Do things right and do the right things
• A combination of the above
Alleen tekst
Joined contract with RWS
1 maart 2017|24
Percelen:
•H = Nieuwe Maas / Waterweg +
aanliggende havens
•G = Maasmond + Calandkanaal +
Beerkanaal
•Z = Hbr (Maasvlakte+Europoort)
Tekst + afbeelding (S)
Joined contract with RWS
Motivation for joined contract
• Maintenance area’s of RWS and PoR share large borders, sediment dynamicsand –risks
• Maintenance dredging is carried out for the same system of ports, rivers andfairways
• Maintenance dredging is carried out with the same equipment.
• Combining the dredging assignments in one campaign will be more efficient forboth contractors and clients
• Directional contract type more appropriate for this type of maintenance areas(not performance-based)
|25
Tekst + Object (S)
Joined contract with RWS
Contract characteristics combined tender
• Contractors are guaranteed minimum working hours, not exclusivity
• Divided into 2 parcels: Parcel G and Parcel H
• Payment per dredged volume:– M³s - 1,2 t/m³ (PoR)– TDS (RWS)
• Additional combined sandmining:– Included in assignments PoR– Contractors own responsibilty in assignments RWS
• Additional services:– Surveying of maintenance area in parcel H (RWS)
• MARS (2) System applies on all parcels
1 maart 2017|26
Tekst + afbeelding (M)
Sustainability
• Company goals or social responsibility?
• Minimal tresholds for reducing:
• CO2, Sox, Nox, PM ?
• How to weigh effect when tendering?
• How to include incentives in contract?
• PoR: rewarded “proposal with significant reduction” with contract extensions!
1 maart 2017|27
Tekst + afbeelding (S)
Performance measurement:
Ex-situ (hopper volumes):
− Sounding lead, TDS systems, etc.
− Relatively easy to accuire
− Executed by client, contractor or third party
− Requires manpower for measuring or managing the system (IT)
− Not nessecarily a measure for performance on harbour-bed
In-situ (echosoundings)
− Mulitbeam echosoundings
− In-situ density and/or shear stress measurements
− Executed by client, contractor of third party
− Influenced by bulking-effect, currents/tides, shipping, other dredging activities
• Exact relation between the two is often hard to find
• Requires in-depth knowledge of matter
Tekst + afbeelding (S)
Performance measurement:
Quality management demands:
− System assessments (ISO)
− All the required certificates and logs up-to-date
− Compliancy with local regulations (permits)
− Health & Safety management
Specific performance measurements
− General “report-grades” for reporting, communication
− Evaluate process-data
− Task analasys
Client-interaction performance
− Response to incidents/disruptions
− Non-conformities and issue management
Alleen tekst
Dredging contracts
Conclusions/recommendations
• Every contract starts with:
• Assessment of your own situation: risks, needs, mandate, legal frame
• Assessment of the market situation: supply / demand profiles, availabilty
• Assessment and development of opportunities for coorporation with other clients/stakeholders
• Every contract should include:
• Balanced risk distribution that is more than insurance
• Clear scope, management of expectations
• Definite terms where needed, flexibility when possible (or needed)