dragon slides_david baker
TRANSCRIPT
Anatomy
• Two heads:
• increasing admin burden
• decreasing capacity to measure
• One body:
• no information (data) flows
Researchproposal
Researchactivity
PersonResearch
results
Financialreporting
Funderpolicies
Institutionalpolicies
Data management plans & infra
Impacts –social, economic
& culturalSubstantive
reportingMetrics
Researchservices data
BudgetResearch
classificationHQP
trainingData
IDPerson
ID
Outcomes(e.g. Knowledgeadvancement)
Regulatoryrequirements
Ethics approval& monitoring
Peerreview
OrganizationID
Contributorroles
Collaborativetypes
Outputs
Some elements of a complex ecosystem that we trackRESEARCH ADMINISTRATION DATA
All Funding Agencies are…
All Institutions are…
All Governments are…
All Industry Partners are…
...but each in a silo
•Substantivereporting
•Metrics
•Impacts –social, economic& cultural
•Outcomes(e.g. Knowledgeadvancement)
•Data ID
•Person ID
•Outputs
•Researchclassification
•Funderpolicies
•Financialreporting
RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION DATAThe players and how they use research admin data
ID-ing, Defining, Classifying, Grouping:
People, Orgs, Projects,
Equipment, Investments,
Outputs, Impacts
•Budget
•DataManagement plans & infra
•Regulatoryrequirements
•Ethics approval& monitoring
•Collaborativetypes
•Peerreview
•Contributorroles
•HQPtraining
•Researchservicesdata
All Funding Agencies are…
All Institutions are…
All Governments are…
All Industry Partners are…
ID-ing, Defining, Classifying, Grouping:
People, Orgs, Projects,
Equipment, Investments,
Outputs, Impacts
•Budget
•DataManagement plans & infra
•Regulatoryrequirements
•Ethics approval& monitoring
•Collaborativetypes
•Peerreview
•Contributorroles
•HQPtraining
•Researchservicesdata
•Substantivereporting
•Metrics
•Impacts –social, economic& cultural
•Outcomes(e.g. Knowledgeadvancement)
•Data ID
•Person ID
•Outputs
•Researchclassification
•Funderpolicies
•Financialreporting
RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION DATABenefits of a practical, standards-based view
HOW DOES THE PROBLEM IMPACT KEY STAKEHOLDERS?
IMPLICATIONS
• RESEARCH TEAMS - time-
consuming to adhere to largely
common administrative
requirements; retype the same
data repeatedly when applying or
reporting; 42% overhead
• ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGERS -
lack robust data to track their
operations and have evidence of
the difference their interventions
make.
• POLICYMAKERS/EVALUATORS -
consistently frustrated by an
inability to draw meaningful
conclusions from a growing
mountain of disconnected data
• TOOL SUPPLIERS - must build
customized tools for each
stakeholder based on ‘silos’;
harder to scale and launch in
new markets; more expensive for
each funder or institutional client.
Mu
ltip
lici
ty o
f G
oo
ds
Mu
ltip
ilic
ity
of
met
ho
ds
for
tran
spo
rtin
g/s
to
rin
g
Do
I wo
rry ab
ou
t ho
w
go
od
s interact
(e.g. co
ffee b
eans n
ext to
spices)
Can
I transp
ort
qu
ickly and
sm
oo
thly
(e.g. fro
m b
oat
to train
to tru
ck)Cargo Transport Pre-1960
? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Also an NxN Matrix
Mul
tiplic
ity o
f G
oods
Mul
tiplic
ity o
f m
etho
ds f
or
tran
spor
ting/
stor
ing
Do I w
orry about how
goods interact (e.g. coffee beans
next to spices)
Can I transport quickly and
smoothly
(e.g. from boat to train to truck)
Solution: Intermodal Shipping Container
…in between, can be loaded and unloaded, stacked, transported efficiently over long distances, and transferred from one mode of transport to another
A standard container that is loaded with virtually any goods, and stays sealed until it reaches final delivery.
and spawned an Intermodal Shipping Container Ecosystem
• 90% of all cargo now shipped in a standard container• Order of magnitude reduction in cost and time to load
and unload ships• Massive reduction in losses due to theft or damage• Huge reduction in freight cost as percent of final goods
(from >25% to <3%)massive globalizations • 5000 ships deliver 200M containers per year
INSTITUTIO
N? ? ? ? ?
INSTITUTIO
N? ? ? ? ?
INSTITUTIO
N? ? ? ? ?
FUNDER ? ? ? ? ?
FUNDER ? ? ? ? ?
FUNDER ? ? ? ? ?
INDUSTRY ? ? ? ? ?
INDUSTRY ? ? ? ? ?
FUNDER FUNDERINSTITUTIO
N
INSTITUTIO
NINDUSTRY
RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION INTEROPERABILITY NXN PROBLEM
INSTITUTI
ON
INSTITUTI
ON
INSTITUTI
ON
FUNDER
FUNDER
FUNDER
INDUSTRY
INDUSTRY
FUNDER FUNDERINSTITUTI
ON
INSTITUTI
ONINDUSTRY
CASRAI VIEW OF RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION
• Neutral body convening/facilitating the table
• Known community leaders (chairs) as champions coordinators (volition)
• Representative subject experts (working groups) focus on the content
• Scope containment - small projects that fit into a larger whole
• Unambiguous agreements for IT/software experts
• Standardize the policy agreements - a common reporting format
• Least imperfect solution to a hard problem
WHERE OPEN STANDARDS FIT