draft fy 2015 annual land use control monitoring report ...mec munitions and explosives of concern...

Draft

2015 Annual Land Use Control Monitoring Report, RVAAP-01 Ramsdell Quarry Landfill

and RVAAP-05 Winklepeck Burning Grounds

Camp Ravenna Joint Military Training Center

Former Ravenna Army Ammunition Plant Portage and Trumbull Counties, Ohio

Contract No. W912QR-13-C-0031

Prepared for:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Louisville District

Prepared by:

December 7, 2015

Draft 1 2015 Annual Land Use Control Monitoring Report, 2

RVAAP-01 Ramsdell Quarry Landfill 3 and 4

RVAAP-05 Winklepeck Burning Grounds 5 6

Camp Ravenna Joint Military Training Center 7 Former Ravenna Army Ammunition Plant 8

Portage and Trumbull Counties, Ohio 9 10

Contract No. W912QR-13-C-0031 11 12 13 14

Prepared for: 15

16 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 17

Louisville District 18 19

20

Prepared by: 21

22

23 24

December 7, 2015 25 26 27

28

Draft FY2015 Annual Land Use Control Monitoring Report, RVAAP-01 Ramsdell Quarry Landfill and RVAAP-05 Winklepeck Burning Grounds Camp Ravenna, Ohio

\\BUFFALONAS\ContractFiles\Technical\VISTA_Reports\LUC_Reports\FY2015_LUC_Reports\Combined Annual Report\Draft\Draft_FY15_ANNUAL_LUC_RPT.docx

DISCLAIMER STATEMENT 29 30

This document is a work prepared for the United States Government by Vista Sciences 31 Corporation. In no event shall either the United States Government or Vista Sciences Corporation 32 have any responsibility or liability for any consequences of any use, misuse, inability to use, or 33 reliance on the information contained herein, nor does either warrant or otherwise represent in any 34 way the accuracy, adequacy, efficacy, or applicability of the contents hereof. 35

36 37 38 39

40



41

Place Holder for 42

Ohio EPA Approval Letter 43

44 (Letter will be inserted upon approval) 45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58



DOCUMENT DISTRIBUTION 59 For the 60

Draft 2015 Annual Land Use Control Monitoring Report, 61 RVAAP-01 Ramsdell Quarry Landfill and RVAAP-05 Winklepeck Burning Grounds 62

63 Camp Ravenna Joint Military Training Center 64

Former Ravenna Army Ammunition Plant 65 Portage and Trumbull Counties, Ohio 66

67

Name/Organization Number of Printed

Copies Number of

Electronic Copies

Mark Leeper, ARNG-ILE Clean Up 0 1

Kevin Sedlak, ARNG and Katie Tait, OHARNG 1 1

Andrew Kocher, Ohio EPA Project Manager – NEDO-DERR 1 3

Justin Burke, Ohio EPA – CDO-DERR 0 Email w/o attachments0

Quyet La, USACE - Louisville 1 1

Administrative Record – RVAAP Restoration Program 2 2

68 ARNG-ILE = Army National Guard Environmental Programs Division 69 OHARNG = Ohio Army National Guard 70 Ohio EPA-NEDO-DERR = Ohio Environmental Protection Agency-Northeast District Office –Division of 71 Environmental Response and Revitalization 72 Ohio EPA-CDO-DERR = Ohio Environmental Protection Agency-Central District Office –Division of 73 Environmental Response and Revitalization 74 USACE = United States Army Corps of Engineers 75 RVAAP = Ravenna Army Ammunition Plant 76



Page i

TABLE OF CONTENTS 77 SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 78

1.1 Report Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 79 1.2 Facility Location ................................................................................................................... 1 80

1.3 Facility History ...................................................................................................................... 2 81

1.4 Land Use Controls, Monitoring, And Reporting Requirements ........................................... 3 82

1.5 Annual LUC Inspection and Monitoring Report Requirement ............................................. 3 83

SECTION 2.0 ANNUAL LUC MONITORING REPORT FOR RAMSDELL QUARRY 84 LANDFILL ............................................................................................................................... 5 85

2.1 Ramsdell Quarry Landfill...................................................................................................... 5 86

2.2 RQL Annual Inspection Form ............................................................................................... 6 87

SECTION 3.0 ANNUAL LUC MONITORING REPORT FOR WINKLEPECK 88 BURNING GROUNDS ............................................................................................................... 10 89

3.1 Winklepeck Burning Grounds ............................................................................................. 10 90 3.2 LUC Quarterly Inspection and Report Mechanisms for WBG ........................................... 10 91

3.3 Land Use Control Awareness Training ............................................................................... 12 92

3.4 Camp Ravenna Perimeter Fence ......................................................................................... 12 93

SECTION 4.0 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................. 14 94 4.1 General LUC Training ........................................................................................................ 14 95

4.2 Land Use Consistency and Land Use Control Effectiveness at RQL ................................. 14 96

4.3 Land Use Consistency and Land Use Control Effectiveness at WBG ................................ 14 97

4.4 Land Use Control Deficiency Corrective Action at RQL and WBG .................................. 15 98 4.5 Land Use Control Effectiveness Certification .................................................................... 15 99

SECTION 5.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................. 16 100

101

102

LIST OF APPENDICES 103

Appendix A Weekly RQL Inspection Reports 104 Appendix B RQL Soil Repair Memo 105 Appendix C Quarterly RQL Inspection Reports 106 Appendix D RQL Access Logs 107 108



Page ii

LIST OF APPENDICES, continued 109 Appendix E RQL Annual Inspection Photographs 110 Appendix F FY 2015 Quarterly Land Use Control Index Maps 111 Appendix G Final FY 2015 First Quarter Land Use Control Inspection, RVAAP-05 112

Winklepeck Burning Grounds 113 Appendix H Final FY 2015 Second Quarter Land Use Control Inspection, RVAAP-05 114

Winklepeck Burning Grounds 115 Appendix I Final FY 2015 Third Quarter Land Use Control Inspection, RVAAP-05 116

Winklepeck Burning Grounds 117 Appendix J Final FY 2015 Fourth Quarter Land Use Control Inspection, RVAAP-05 118

Winklepeck Burning Grounds 119 Appendix K FY 2015 Perimeter Fence Defect Call Outs Identified and Repaired 120 121



Page iii

LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 122

ACM Asbestos Containing Material 123 AOC Area of Concern 124 AR Army Regulation 125 ARNG Army National Guard 126 bgs below ground surface 127 Camp Ravenna Camp Ravenna Joint Military Training Center 128 CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability 129

Act 130 C.F.R. Code of Federal Regulations 131 DFFOs Director’s Final Findings and Orders 132 FWSAP Facility-Wide Sampling and Analysis Plan 133 FWGWMPP Facility-Wide Groundwater Monitoring Program Plan 134 FY Fiscal Year 135 GIS Geographical Information System 136 IRP Installation Restoration Program 137 LUC Land Use Control 138 MK Mark 139 MEC Munitions and Explosives of Concern 140 MRS Munitions Response Site 141 NCP National Contingency Plan 142 NBC Nuclear, Biological, Chemical 143 Ohio EPA Ohio Environmental Protection Agency 144 OHARNG Ohio Army National Guard 145 PMP Property Management Plan 146 RD Remedial Design 147 RDX Research Department Explosive 148 ROD Record of Decision 149 RQL Ramsdell Quarry Landfill 150 RVAAP Ravenna Army Ammunition Plant 151 SOP Standard Operating Procedure 152 TNT Trinitrotoluene 153 U.S.C. United States Code 154 USP&FO United States Property and Fiscal Officer 155 UXO Unexploded Ordnance 156 WBG Winklepeck Burning Grounds 157

Draft 2015 Annual Land Use Control Monitoring Report RVAAP-01 Ramsdell Quarry Landfill and RVAAP-05 Winklepeck Burning Grounds Camp Ravenna, Ohio


Page 1

SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION 158

1.1 Report Introduction 159 As of September 2015, two areas at the former Ravenna Army Ammunition Plant (RVAAP), 160 now known as the Camp Ravenna Joint Military Training Center (Camp Ravenna) have 161 designated Land Use Controls (LUCs); Ramsdell Quarry Landfill (RQL) and Winklepeck 162 Burning Grounds (WBG). As explained in greater detail in Sections 1.4 and 1.5, annual reports 163 are required for the areas at Camp Ravenna that utilize LUCs to protect the integrity of an 164 environmental remedy (if present), human health, and the environment by limiting the activities 165 that may occur at those areas. 166

The following sections present the 2015 Annual Report for Land Use Controls Inspections, 167 RVAAP-01 Ramsdell Quarry Landfill and RVAAP-05 Winklepeck Burning Grounds, Camp 168 Ravenna Joint Military Training Facility, Former Ravenna Army Ammunition Plant, Portage and 169 Trumbull Counties, Ohio. This annual report is laid out as follows: 170

Section 1.0 – General introduction to the facility, and a general description of Land Use 171 Controls, monitoring and annual reporting requirements. 172 Section 2.0 – Annual Report for RQL. 173 Section 3.0 – Summary of FY2015 Quarterly LUC Inspection Reports for WBG. 174 Section 4.0 – Conclusions 175 Section 5.0 – References 176

1.2 Facility Location 177 Camp Ravenna is located in northeastern Ohio within Portage and Trumbull counties, and is 178 approximately three miles east/northeast of the City of Ravenna and one mile north/northwest of 179 the City of Newton Falls. The facility is approximately 11 miles long and 3.5 miles wide. The 180 facility is bounded by State Route 5, the Michael J. Kirwan Reservoir, and the CSX System 181 Railroad to the south; Garret, McCormick, and Berry Roads to the west; the Norfolk Southern 182 Railroad to the north; and State Route 534 to the east, as shown in Figure 1. In addition, the 183 facility is surrounded by the communities of Windham, Garrettsville, Charlestown, and 184 Wayland. 185

186



Page 2

187

Figure 1.0 Map of Camp Ravenna Joint Military Training Center 188 (Former Ravenna Army Ammunition Plant) 189

190

1.3 Facility History 191 RVAAP was a load, assemble, and pack facility built to produce large-caliber artillery projectiles 192 and bombs. Although RVAAP downsized after World War II, plant production lines were 193 reactivated during the Korean and Vietnam Wars. Additionally, the plant conducted nearly 194 continuous demilitarization of war stocks, refurbishment of inventoried ammunition, and minor 195 research and development projects. By 1992, the installation's status changed from "inactive but 196 maintained" to that of "caretaker." 197

The Department of Defense established the Installation Restoration Program (IRP) to provide 198 guidance and funding for the investigation and cleanup of potential contamination and past 199 operations caused by historical activities at military installations. The IRP began at RVAAP in 200 1989. Administrative accountability for the initial acreage of the facility was transferred to the 201 United States Property and Fiscal Officer (USP&FO) for Ohio in May 1999 with subsequent 202 transfers to follow. To date, administrative accountability for the entire 21,683-acre facility has 203 been transferred to the USP&FO for Ohio and subsequently licensed to the Ohio Army National 204 Guard (OHARNG) for use as a military training site, Camp Ravenna. The RVAAP restoration 205 program involves cleanup of former production/operational areas throughout the facility related 206 to former activities conducted under the RVAAP. The restoration program is currently managed 207 by the Army National Guard (ARNG) with support from the OHARNG. 208



Page 3

1.4 Land Use Controls, Monitoring, And Reporting Requirements 209 All work, plans, and documentation for the RVAAP IRP at Camp Ravenna must be in 210 conformance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability 211 Act (CERCLA) [42 United States Code (U.S.C.) §9601, et seq.], the National Contingency Plan 212 (NCP) [40 Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) Part 300], and the Director's Final Findings and 213 Orders (DFFOs) [June 10, 2004]. If residual contamination is left in place after the CERCLA 214 remediation process is complete and the contamination still poses a potential for unacceptable 215 risks or exceeds cleanup standards, then the Record of Decision (ROD) for the Areas of 216 Concern/Munitions Response Sites (AOC/MRS) will require LUCs in accordance with the 217 approved Remedial Design (RD). 218

LUCs include any physical, legal, or administrative mechanism that places restrictions on the use 219 of, or limits access to, real property to prevent exposure to contaminants at concentrations greater 220 than permissible levels or other safety issues. The intent of using these controls is to protect the 221 integrity of the remedy (if present), human health, and the environment by limiting the activities 222 that may occur at an AOC/MRS. When implemented, these LUCs provide protection to 223 individuals using or working at the AOC/MRS by limiting and/or preventing activities which 224 could potentially result in risks to those individuals. The Army is responsible for controlling 225 land use on active installations such as Camp Ravenna and can internally restrict the use of such 226 property. LUCs may include engineering controls such as fences, Seibert markers and signs, or 227 administrative controls such as awareness training and restrictions on use including type of use 228 and duration. 229 The Property Management Plan (PMP), dated August 2012, identifies LUCs and restrictions for 230 specific AOCs/MRSs at Camp Ravenna and provides mechanisms to implement and manage 231 those LUCs. The PMP is required under Army Regulation (AR) 210-20 and satisfies 232 requirements of the DFFOs. The PMP lists general performance objectives of LUCs at Camp 233 Ravenna as well as AOC/MRS specific LUCs detailed to address the concerns present on that 234 particular AOC/MRS. According to Section 1.3 of the PMP, it is the responsibility of the Army 235 to implement, inspect, maintain and enforce LUCs set forth under the RVAAP Restoration 236 Program. 237

1.5 Annual LUC Inspection and Monitoring Report Requirement 238 The PMP requires that the Army conduct a minimum of an annual inspection of the LUCs to 239 confirm that the LUCs remain effective and still meet the LUC objectives, and also requires that 240 the results of the annual LUC inspection be included in an Annual LUC Monitoring Report to be 241 submitted to the Ohio EPA for review and approval. The Annual LUC Monitoring Report is 242 required to evaluate the status and effectiveness of LUCs with a description of how LUC 243 deficiencies, including inconsistent land uses, were addressed. The Annual LUC Monitoring 244 Reports will be used in the preparation of the CERCLA 121(c) Five-Year Review. This Annual 245 LUC Monitoring Report presents the following: 246

• The FY 2015 Annual Report for the Ramsdell Quarry Landfill. The LUCS were 247 instituted for RQL in December 2014. This is the first annual LUC report for RQL. 248



Page 4

• A summary of the monitoring conducted during the Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 Quarterly 249 LUC Inspection Reports for WBG. This is the third annual report completed in 250 accordance with the Final PMP dated August 2012. 251

Additionally, the PMP requires that a written certification will be submitted with the Annual 252 Monitoring Report that states whether or not the LUCs remain in place and are effective. The 253 written certifications for both the RQL and WBL LUCs are presented in Section 4.4. 254



Page 5

SECTION 2.0 ANNUAL LUC MONITORING REPORT FOR RAMSDELL 255 QUARRY LANDFILL 256

2.1 Ramsdell Quarry Landfill 257 RQL encompasses approximately 14 acres in the northeastern portion of Camp Ravenna. RQL 258 was initially a stone quarry that was excavated 30 to 40 feet below existing grade until ceasing 259 quarrying operations in 1941. From 1946 to the 1950s, the bottom of the quarry was used to 260 burn waste explosives from Load Line 1. Between 1941 and 1989, the western and southern 261 sections of the abandoned quarry were used for landfill operations. No information is available 262 regarding landfill disposal activities from 1941 to 1976, and no information is available on other 263 activities at the quarry from the 1950s to 1976. Only nonhazardous solid waste was deposited in 264 RQL from 1976 until it was closed in 1989. In 1978, a portion of the abandoned quarry was 265 permitted as a sanitary landfill by the State of Ohio. The sanitary landfill closed in 1990 under 266 State of Ohio solid waste regulations, and was covered by a clay cap covering approximately 267 four acres. 268

Although post-closure requirements for RQL under State of Ohio solid waste regulations only 269 require that a quarterly inspection be conducted, weekly inspections have been conducted at the 270 site as a best management practice. The weekly inspections assess the condition of various 271 aspects of the RQL, including (but not limited to) vehicular access, gate and fence condition, 272 landfill and cap integrity, and groundwater monitoring well security. The weekly inspection 273 sheets from December 1, 2014 through October 15, 2015 are presented in Appendix A. 274

A large amount of construction and miscellaneous debris was discovered during soil remediation 275 and removal activities in the quarry bottom in June 2010. A portion of the debris was found to 276 have asbestos-containing material (ACM) in them. After removing and disposing of the soil and 277 construction debris (all considered as ACM), the area was backfilled and graded to the pre-278 excavation elevation. 279

RQL is managed as Restricted Access due to residual asbestos and contamination and the closed 280 landfill. Permissible exposure parameters have been established for personnel accessing the 281 RQL, and are defined as one hour/day for 250 days/year for 25 years. In order to enforce the 282 Restricted Access status of the RQL, the following LUCs were established in December 2014: 283

• All digging or excavation within the quarry bottom is prohibited. 284 • Digging and excavation on the landfill cap will be regulated by the post-closure care plan 285

and the Ohio solid waste regulations. 286 • Permanent warning signs will be installed and maintained around RQL on the gates and 287

on the chain-link and high tensile wire fence at 300 ft. centers to warn of the ACM hazard 288 in the quarry bottom. The signs will meet the requirements of OAC 3745-20-289 07(B)(1)(b). 290

• As no soil disturbing activities are allowed within the quarry bottom, OSHA asbestos 291 training set forth at 29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(9)(vii) is not required. Any personnel entering 292 the quarry bottom will be briefed of the asbestos hazards. 293



Page 6

In order to track exposure, personnel entering the LUC area sign an access log sheet each time 294 they enter and exit the LUC area. 295

2.2 RQL Annual Inspection Form 296

Camp Ravenna Joint Military Training Center (Camp Ravenna)/ Former Ravenna Army 297 Ammunition Plant (RVAAP) Land Use Control (LUC) Inspection Form for RVAAP-01 298

Ramsdell Quarry Landfill AOC 299

In accordance with the Camp Ravenna/former RVAAP PMP (dated August 2012) and Appendix 300 A-2 and the Final Remedial Design for Soil and Dry Sediment at RVAAP-01 Ramsdell Quarry 301 Landfill (RQL), a LUC inspection of RQL was conducted by Allan Brillinger (Vista Sciences 302 Corporation) on behalf of Camp Ravenna on October 15, 2015. 303 304 According to LUCs set forth in the Final Remedial Design for Soil and Dry Sediment at 305 the RVAAP-01 Ramsdell Quarry Landfill, dated 9 April 2014, and memorialized in the PMP, 306 periodic monitoring of LUCs, in the form of site inspections, is required to be conducted by 307 the Army to confirm that the LUCs remain effective and still meet LUC objectives for 308 continued remedy protectiveness. Site inspections are required to be conducted on an 309 annual basis and inspections of the solid waste landfill are conducted in accordance with State 310 of Ohio solid waste regulations and the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA) 311 Director’s Final Findings and Orders (Ohio EPA 2004). Additional LUC inspections may 312 be conducted when landfill inspections are conducted as needed. The required Annual LUC 313 Report is to be submitted to the Ohio EPA for review and approval. 314

315 The inspections shall include the following: 316

• Review of LUC training/inbriefs/maintenance and access logs and other documentation 317 as applicable to RQL. 318

• Evaluation of activities at RQL to ensure that all activities executed within RQL are 319 in compliance with the established digging restrictions and established exposure limits 320 (Security Guard/Maintenance Worker - one (1) hour/day for 250 days/year for 25 years). 321

o All digging or excavation within the quarry bottom is prohibited due to residual 322 asbestos and contamination. 323

o Digging and excavation on the landfill cap will be regulated by the post closure 324 care plan and the Ohio solid waste regulations. 325

o Due to not meeting the industrial/commercial standard, exposure monitoring 326 for the full-time facility employee must be conducted to ensure and document 327 that exposure at the AOC is not above the established exposure limit set 328 for the Security Guard/Maintenance worker of one (1) hour/day for 250 329 days/year for 25 years. 330

• Inspection of warning signs on gates and fencing. 331 • Inspection of RQL fencing and gates. 332

333 LUC deficiencies or inconsistent land uses that are identified must be reported and identified 334 on the inspection form/report and must also be reported to the Army National Guard 335 (ARNG)/Ohio Army National Guard (OHARNG). 336

337


38 Review of LUCs – Management/Corrective Action

Activities and Land Use: a) This AOC is to be managed as Restricted Access and is restricted from residential land

use. Has residential use occurred? Have other land uses or land use changes occurred?

No residential land use has occurred at the RQL. There have been no other land uses or land use changes over the past year.

b) What activities have occurred at RQL since last Inspection? Has any maintenance been performed at the AOC?

This is the first annual inspection of the RQL since the LUCs were instituted in December 201. The high tensile wire fence was repaired due to single strand breaks in December 2014 and January 2015. In mid-January, three eroded areas within the LUC enclosure (but off the landfill cap) were filled with clean soil, and were seeded April 2015 once the snow cover melted (Appendix B). Annual mowing was conducted for the RQL in early October. Additional minor eroded/settled areas inside the LUC enclosure (but off the landfill cap) were filled with clean soil and seeded in October 2015.

Weekly inspections were conducted in accordance with Ohio solid waste regulations. The weekly inspection forms are presented in Appendix A. Quarterly inspections were conducted by the Portage County Health Department. The quarterly inspection letters are presented in Appendix C.

Semi-annual groundwater monitoring activities were conducted at the RQL in March 2015 and July 2015.

c) Are activities at RQL being conducted in compliance with established digging restrictions and established exposure limits (exposure for full-time employees who access RQL must be tracked)?

The activities taking place at RQL are being conducted in accordance with the established digging restrictions. The exposure limits to personnel who must access the RQL LUC area are being tracked with Log In sheets that every person entering the LUC area must fill out when entering and exiting the LUC area. The completed Access Log sheets for December 2014 through October 15, 2015 are presented in Appendix D.

d) Are the warning signs in place and functional? Please note condition and any deficiencies.

The warning signs are posted on the RQL LUC fence and gate as required. Signs that read “DANGER – Unauthorized Personnel Keep Out” and “Danger – Asbestos Waste Disposal Site – Do Not Create Dust – Breathing Asbestos is Hazardous to Your Health” are posted on the LUC fence and gate at 300 ft. centers.


Page 7

3



Page 8

e) Is the RQL fencing and gates intact and in good condition? Please note condition and any deficiencies.

The RQL fencing and gate are intact and in good condition. There are no deficiencies with the fence and gates.

Inspections and Reporting Inspections are required on an annual basis. Periodic monitoring inspections may be conducted as needed. Are annual inspections being conducted as required? Have any additional inspections been completed?

The annual LUC inspection was conducted on October 15, 2015. As per Ohio solid waste regulations, The RQL is inspected weekly. The weekly RQL inspection forms are presented in Appendix A. Additionally, the Portage County Health Department conducts a quarterly inspection of the RQL. The Portage County Health Department inspection letters are presented in Appendix D. Photographs of the RQL LUC area taken during the annual inspection are presented in Appendix E.

An Annual Report is required. Has the annual report been completed and submitted to the Ohio EPA?

The RQL LUCs were instituted in December 2014. This is the first annual inspection and report for the RQL LUCs.

Training/Inbriefs (as applicable to RQL): Are RQL LUC training and/or inbriefs (for those who need to access RQL) being conducted as applicable? Describe the training (content/who attended/who provided/documentation of training).

LUC training is provided annually to all Camp Ravenna staff and tenant units at Camp Ravenna, and was conducted on March 3rd and 5th, 2015. The LUC training is typically provided by Katie Tait and/or Tim Morgan, Camp Ravenna-Environmental. The training provides an overview of the history of the facility, the ongoing cleanup work, the location of the cleanup sites, any land use controls/restrictions on AOCs/Munitions Response Sites (MRS), and specific LUC and other restrictions for RQL, as well as other areas at Camp Ravenna. Training materials and rosters are on file in the Camp Ravenna Environmental Office. Training will be conducted for additional Camp Ravenna staff and contractors that missed the March training dates as needed.

A “Land Use Control (LUC) Brief for Contractors/Personnel” was conducted for all personnel that entered the RQL LUC area. The training consisted of a review of the RQL site history, the environmental hazards present at the RQL, the LUC s that have been instituted, and the requirements of all personnel that enter the LUC area. All personnel that have received the brief sign the briefing form that states that they have been briefed and understand the RQL



Page 9

LUC requirements, and that they will comply with all requirements. The signed briefing forms are kept on file at the Camp Ravenna Environmental office.

If training was not provided, explain why and what corrective actions were initiated.

N/A

Is access to RQL for full-time employees of the facility being logged in order to track exposure? Please review access logs to ensure exposure is within the established exposure limits.

Access for all personnel entering the RQL LUC area are being tracked with the Access Log. The established exposure limits are one (1) hour/day for 250 days/year for 25 years. The most any one worker was working inside the RQL area from December 1, 2014 through October 15, 2015 was 41 hours for a Maintenance Worker. The Maintenance Worker that had the 41 hours within the LUC area spent 4.5 hours conducting soil repairs and 36.5 hours mowing.

LUC Violations (if any): Description of any observed/noted LUC violation(s) as identified.

The top wire of the 5-wire fence was observed to be broken on December 19, 2014 and again on January 30, 2015.

Date of Notification of LUC violations (if applicable) to ARNG/OHARNG:

The above-noted fence wire breaks were reported to ARNG/OHARNG on December 19, 2014 and January 30, 2015.

Description of any corrective actions taken to remedy observed LUC violations or recommended corrective actions:

The fence was repaired on December 30, 2014 and again on March 13, 2015.

Additional Notes/Comments:

Original Inspection Completed by:

Signature:

Printed Name: Allan B. Brillinger Title: Program Manager Organization: Vista Sciences Corporation Date: October 15, 2015

339



Page 10

SECTION 3.0 ANNUAL LUC MONITORING REPORT FOR WINKLEPECK 340 BURNING GROUNDS 341

3.1 Winklepeck Burning Grounds 342 As described in the Property Management Plan (PMP), WBG encompasses 211.66 acres and is 343 located in the central portion of Camp Ravenna (see Appendix F maps). The burning grounds 344 area has been in operation since 1941. Prior to 1980, burning was conducted on the bare ground 345 and the ash was abandoned at the site. Wastes treated in the area included Research Department 346 Explosive (RDX), antimony sulfide, Composition B, lead azide, trinitrotoluene (TNT), 347 propellants, black powder, waste oil, sludge from the load lines, domestic wastes, and small 348 amounts of laboratory chemicals. From 1980 until 1998, periodic burning of scrap explosives, 349 propellants, and explosive-contaminated waste materials (e.g., wipe rags, paper, and cardboard) 350 was conducted in raised refractory-lined metal trays within a 1.5-acre area. A Part-B permit 351 covering the active portion of the site was withdrawn in 1994. The burn trays along the 90-day 352 storage unit of Building 1601 were closed in accordance with Ohio Environmental Protection 353 Agency (Ohio EPA) guidance in 1998. Munitions and Explosives of Concern (MEC) is present 354 in the Area of Concern (AOC). The previously applied remedy at the WBG AOC consisted of 355 excavation of contaminated soil to preclude likely exposure through human contact. A portion 356 of that remedy resulted in hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remaining greater 357 than levels that allow unlimited use and unrestricted exposure. Therefore, a component of the 358 remedial action at the WBG AOC includes LUCs which are detailed in Section A-1.6 of the 359 PMP. 360

Per the PMP, the land use for the WBG is Small Arms Range (including the existing Mark [MK] 361 19 Grenade Machinegun Range) for the OHARNG Military Use and Training. The Department 362 of the Army has classified the Small Arms Range as an Operational Range at the WBG AOC. 363 The Small Arms Range Land Use, in terms of the Risk Assessment, was created to assess 364 specific training activities that would occur on a small arms range and was developed to assess 365 risks to OHARNG personnel. In addition to the small arms training, certain activities are 366 required to sustain and maintain the area as a range, such routine maintenance and activities are 367 permitted if conducted by authorized personnel. More specific maintenance activities that are to 368 be performed by the National Guard Range Maintenance Soldier and/or other similar authorized 369 personnel on the WBG AOC can be found in the PMP. 370

3.2 LUC Quarterly Inspection and Report Mechanisms for WBG 371 The PMP states that site inspections will be conducted on a quarterly basis at WBG. The WBG 372 Inspectors Quarterly Inspection Report Form completed for each quarter of FY 2015 states that 373 all quarterly inspections include evaluation of the following: 374

• Review of LUC training and documentation as applicable to WBG. 375 • Evaluation of the facility perimeter fence to ensure that it is maintained in a manner that is 376

protective and effective and deters trespassers. 377 • Evaluation of activities at WBG to ensure that all activities executed within WBG are in 378

compliance with OHARNG range safety regulations/standard operating procedures (SOPs), 379 established digging restrictions, and established exposure limits. All digging, intrusive 380



Page 11

activities, or excavation on the WBG AOC outside of the Unexploded Ordnance (UXO)/ 381 MEC-cleared areas within the MK-19 Grenade Machinegun Range is prohibited with the 382 following exceptions: 383

o Routine maintenance of roads, ditches, culverts and activities listed in A-1.4 of the 384 PMP (maintenance of targetry and associated lifting mechanisms, range maintenance 385 activities including removal of practice rounds, vegetation management, compatible 386 natural resource management activities, nuisance wildlife control, drainage 387 maintenance, wetland delineation, grassland management, scientific research and 388 sampling activities); 389

o Ground surface repairs by authorized range personnel in support of authorized range 390 activities; 391

o Digging along target array areas by authorized range personnel to a depth of one (1) 392 foot below ground surface (bgs). 393

This shall also include evaluation of required range signage. The range is required to be 394 marked with signage in conformance with the requirements of the current Department of 395 Army regulations. 396

• Evaluation of groundwater activities to ensure that any groundwater activities are being 397 conducted in a manner consistent with established LUCs. Groundwater use or extraction of 398 groundwater located at or underlying the WBG AOC or any portion thereof is prohibited, 399 except for the following: 400

o The installation, development, purging, and sampling of new or existing monitoring 401 wells in accordance with the most recent Facility-Wide Sampling and Analysis Plan 402 (FWSAP) as part of the AOC-specific IRP or Facility-Wide Ground Water 403 Monitoring Program Plan (FWGWMPP). 404

o The abandonment and replacement of monitoring wells damaged by activities 405 conducted on the Installation and wells no longer utilized as part of IRP or 406 FWGWMPP activities, in accordance with Ohio EPA guidance, the most recent 407 FWSAP, and applicable Ohio Administrative Code requirements. 408

409 Four quarterly LUC inspection were conducted during FY 2015. The LUC inspections generally 410 consisted of the following: 411

• An inspection of the Camp Ravenna perimeter fence. 412 • A review of current land uses at WBG to determine if they are in compliance with the 413

LUCs. 414 • A review of activities at WBG since the previous inspection to determine if they are in 415

compliance with the LUCs. 416 • A review of required warning signage. 417 • A review of training applicable to WBG LUCs. 418 • A description of any noted LUC deficiencies, any corrective actions taken to remedy the 419

LUC deficiencies, and/or any recommended corrective action. 420 The following WBG quarterly inspections were conducted in FY 2015 by Don Trocchio of Vista 421 Sciences Corporation: 422

• FY 2015 First Quarter Land Use Control Inspection, RVAAP-05 Winklepeck Burning 423 Grounds (report dated April 3, 2015, inspection completed December 17, 2014). This 424 report is included in Appendix G. 425



Page 12

• FY 2015 Second Quarter Land Use Control Inspection, RVAAP-05 Winklepeck Burning 426 Grounds (report dated July 23, 2015, inspection completed March 31, 2015). This report 427 is included in Appendix H. 428

• FY 2015 Third Quarter Land Use Control Inspection, RVAAP-05 Winklepeck Burning 429 Grounds (report dated October 30, 2015, inspection completed June 15, 2015). This 430 report is included in Appendix I. 431

• FY 2015 Fourth Quarter Land Use Control Inspection, RVAAP-05 Winklepeck Burning 432 Grounds (report dated TBD, inspection completed August 13, 2015). This report is 433 included in Appendix J. 434

3.3 Land Use Control Awareness Training 435 Section 4.2 of the PMP, Land Use Control Awareness Training, describes requirements and 436 guidelines for LUC awareness training at the facility. LUC awareness training for Camp 437 Ravenna staff and tenant units was conducted on March 3rd and 5th, and is provided annually to 438 all Camp Ravenna staff and tenant units at Camp Ravenna. Formal LUC training has been 439 conducted since 2006 and refresher training is given annually to all personnel. The LUC training 440 is typically provided by Katie Tait and/or Tim Morgan, Camp Ravenna-Environmental. The 441 training provides an overview of the history of the facility, the ongoing cleanup work, the 442 location of the cleanup sites, any land use controls/restrictions on AOCs/Munitions Response 443 Sites (MRS), and included specific restrictions for WBG. Annual training is conducted 444 throughout the year as needed for additional Camp Ravenna staff and contractors that missed the 445 March training dates. 446

Using units also receive an in-brief prior to firing on the range. Using units and tenant units at 447 Camp Ravenna are not allowed down range. Environmental contractors who access WBG are 448 also provided with an in-brief which informs them of the LUCs/restrictions at the AOC. They 449 must read and sign the in-brief form. Training records are kept on file in the Camp Ravenna 450 Environmental Office. 451

3.4 Camp Ravenna Perimeter Fence 452 Currently, the only facility-wide engineering control for the AOCs/MRSs is the perimeter fence, 453 as listed in Section 4.1.1 of the PMP. The Camp Ravenna perimeter fence is situated mostly in 454 Portage County, Ohio, with a small portion (see maps in Appendix F – FY 2015 Quarterly Land 455 Use Control Index Maps) extending easterly into western Trumbull County, Ohio. The entire 456 perimeter fence was inspected for each of the FY 2015 quarterly inspections. 457

The majority of the original Camp Ravenna perimeter fence is approximately seventy years old. 458 Most, but not all, of the perimeter fence situated within Trumbull County is less than 459 approximately ten years old. Typically, but not all, of the perimeter fence consists of a six foot 460 high chain link fence fabric with steel I-beam shaped posts set on 10 to 12 foot centers set in 461 concrete footers. The top and bottom of the fence fabric is reinforced with a horizontal pipe 462 running along the entire length. On top of each post is a V bracket with six strands of 15-gauge 463 barb wire, three strands inward facing and three strands outward facing. Twenty-six access gates 464 are scattered throughout the approximate 30 miles of perimeter fencing evaluated (see maps in 465



Page 13

Appendix F – FY 2015 Quarterly Land Use Control Index Maps). Most of the former railroad 466 access gates have been welded shut along with a few vehicle access gates that are no longer used. 467

In addition to documenting compliance with training, operation, and maintenance requirement 468 set forth in the PMP, quarterly inspections also identify, document, and map major defects along 469 the perimeter fence for future repair. In the inspector’s judgment, a major defect was considered 470 a breach in the fence through which an adult could gain unlawful access to the facility. 471 Additionally, during the evaluation, major defects noted in previous inspections were visited and 472 repairs logged if completed or ongoing. Geographical Information System (GIS) raw field data 473 collected from the inspections were reduced and compiled in ESRI Arc Map. Index Maps 474 depicting the call outs along with Detail Maps and photographs of each call out were prepared 475 and submitted along with the WBG Inspectors Quarterly Inspection Report Form. Final 476 approved versions of each FY 2015 Quarterly LUC Inspection Report are included in 477 Appendices G, H, I and J of this report. 478

The four quarterly inspections performed in FY 2015 reported a total of 20 documented major 479 defects in the perimeter fence. A total of 13 documented defects from the FY 2014 quarterly 480 inspections had not yet been repaired at end of the FY 2014 reporting period. Of this total, 29 481 repairs were performed and documented in the subsequent (FY 2015) quarterly inspection 482 reports. See Appendix K for a table of all perimeter fence defect call outs identified and repaired 483 in FY 2015. When a major defect is noted during the LUC field inspection the Army is notified 484 via email detailing the date and location. The date of notification is included in the quarterly 485 LUC inspection report under “Section 6. Date of notification of LUC violation (if applicable).” 486

The Camp Ravenna maintenance crews are limited to making only minor fence repairs. Repair 487 logs make reference to “contractor needed” on some call out sections where more extensive 488 repairs are required. An example would be storm washouts (i.e., SE2A) along the perimeter road 489 that continue to damage the perimeter fence. Culvert pipe inlets and outlets become clogged 490 with debris, old corrugated metal culvert pipes have rusted and collapsed and some pipe sizes are 491 unable to handle the storm runoff, all contributing to the washouts along the perimeter road. 492

It should be noted that only repairs of defects called out and included in previous LUC 493 Inspection Reports are conveyed in the detail sheets of the subsequent LUC Inspection Reports. 494 These repairs are documented in repair logs kept by the Camp Ravenna Maintenance Crews and 495 are included with the quarterly reports in Attachment 2 – Camp Ravenna Fence Repair Log 496 (Appendices G, H, I and J of this report). Numerous minor repairs (consisting of patching 497 smaller openings in the fence fabric, replacing missing/broken barb wire, repairing frost heaved 498 posts, removing fallen trees and branches resting on top of the fence) that were not sited during 499 the LUC field inspection, were, and continue to be, repaired by the Camp Ravenna 500 staff/maintenance crew and are not documented in repair logs. Overall, the perimeter fence at 501 Camp Ravenna is intact and in good condition, and is an effective LUC for the WBG. 502



Page 14

SECTION 4.0 CONCLUSION 503

4.1 General LUC Training 504 The OHARNG provided training to all Camp Ravenna staff and tenant units including an 505 overview of the history of the facility, the ongoing cleanup work, the location of the cleanup 506 sites, any land use controls/restrictions on AOCs/MRSs, and specific restrictions for RQL and 507 WBG (See Section 2.2 and 3.3). All training requirements presented in the PMP were met by the 508 OHARNG in FY 2015. Training compliance is demonstrated in the RQL Inspection Form 509 (Section 2.2) and in the FY 2015 Quarterly LUC Inspection Reports for WBG that are included 510 in Appendices G, H, I and J of this report. Training materials and rosters are on file in the Camp 511 Ravenna Environmental Office. 512

4.2 Land Use Consistency and Land Use Control Effectiveness at RQL 513 The land use at RQL is Restricted Access due to residual asbestos, contamination and the closed 514 landfill. Based on the completed weekly, quarterly and annual inspections at RQL, there are no 515 inconsistent uses or activities discovered or reported at RQL during the time when the LUCs 516 were instituted in December 2014 through when the annual inspection was conducted on October 517 15, 2015. All activities conducted within the RQL LUC area were performed in compliance with 518 established digging restrictions, and established exposure limits as described in the PMP. This 519 indicates current LUC objectives are being met to ensure the remedy is effective and protective. 520

An in-brief was provided to all personnel entering the RQL LUC area that included an overview 521 of the history of the RQL, the land use controls/restrictions, and specific restrictions for RQL. 522 All training and maintenance requirements specific to the RQL LUC were met by the OHARNG 523 during this reporting period and is documented in the pages of this report. 524

4.3 Land Use Consistency and Land Use Control Effectiveness at WBG 525 Per the PMP, the land use for the WBG is Small Arms Range (including the existing MK-19 526 Grenade Machinegun Range) for the OHARNG Military Use and Training. Based on the 527 completed inspections during FY 2015, there were no inconsistent uses or activities discovered 528 or reported at WBG. All training and activities conducted within the WBG AOC were 529 performed in compliance with OHARNG range safety regulations/SOP, established digging 530 restrictions, and established exposure limits as described in the PMP. This indicates current 531 LUC objectives are being met to ensure the remedy is effective and protective of human health 532 and the environment. 533

The LUCs for the WBG AOC were evaluated quarterly in FY 2015 as stated in the PMP using 534 the parameters listed in Section 3.1 LUC Quarterly Inspection and Reporting Mechanisms for 535 WBG. These Quarterly LUC Inspections show all LUCs requirements presented in the PMP for 536 WBG remained in place and were effective through FY 2015. 537

Units that utilize the range at WBG also receive an in brief prior to firing on the range and are 538 not allowed down range. Environmental contractors who access WBG are also provided with an 539 in-brief which informs them of the LUCs/restrictions at the AOC. All training, operation, and 540 maintenance requirements specific to WBG presented in the PMP were met by the OHARNG in 541



Page 15

FY 2015 and is documented in the FY 2015 Quarterly LUC Inspection Reports included in 542 Appendix G, H, I and J of this report. 543

4.4 Land Use Control Deficiency Corrective Action at RQL and WBG 544 The main purpose of inspecting and monitoring LUCs is to identify and correct LUC deficiencies 545 and violations. LUC inspection reports allow the OHARNG to document consistent land use, as 546 well as corrective action if deficiencies are encountered. 547 548 For the RQL, inspections were conducted by personnel familiar with the RQL so that changes (if 549 present) were readily noted. Minor fence repairs and soil cover deficiencies were noted and 550 corrected as weather conditions allowed. There repairs were tracked throughout the year to 551 monitor their effectiveness. 552

For the WBG, each quarterly inspection has been conducted using the same parameters, resulting 553 in a uniform and concise system of identification and repair of perimeter fence defect call outs. 554 Of the total number of perimeter fence defect call-outs identified, approximately 80% were 555 repaired by the next quarterly inspection. 556

4.5 Land Use Control Effectiveness Certification 557 This certifies that to the best of my knowledge and belief all of the information contained in this 558 Annual LUC Monitoring Report is accurate, and that the Land Use Controls instituted for the 559 Ramsdell Quarry Landfill and the Winklepeck Burning Grounds are in place and remain 560 effective. 561 562 563 / 564 (signature) (date) 565 566 567 568 (printed name) 569 570 571 572 (Title). 573



Page 16

SECTION 5.0 REFERENCES 574 Final Property Management Plan for the Designated Areas of Concern and Munitions Response 575 Sites, Volume One – Version 1.0. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. August 2012. 576 577 Ravenna Army Ammunition Plant Restoration Program website: www.rvaap.org 578 Final Remedial Action Report for Soil and Dry Sediment at RVAAP-01 Ramsdell Quarry 579 Landfill, Ravenna Army Ammunition Plant, Portage and Trumbull Counties, Ohio. US Army 580 Corps of Engineers. January 30, 2015 581

582 583

http://www.rvaap/



584

585

586

587

588

589

Appendix A 590

Weekly RQL Inspection Reports 591

592

WEEKI..Y INSPECTION OF RAMS.DELL QUARRY LANDFILL

Weather Conditions I Recent P

Tune: Started ,o l '-' 0 . -- ..,.

Tvoe of:. ·-· / .. ,..,.....v,~

1. Vehicular Access

2.Entrance

a. Gate/Chain

3. Landfi11 Site/Cap

a. Vegetative Cover

b. Standing Water on Cap

c. Animal Distmbances

d. Woody Vegetation

e. Gully Erosion/Soil Cover

f. Runott: Siltation

g.Leacbate

14. Monitoring Wells (5) a. Locks inplace?

c. Well ID Legible

5.Commems:

J

. .. . -·

- ..u-' l- \\~00

SiteWalk Other

Statua/Condillon

\.j •

"'A A ,n y '

Ud2..C:... u-~ .

\J

' • ofD . - •. • Action needed:6. D

WE.EKLY INSPECTION OF RAMSDELL QUARRY LANDnLL

Date: Or 1 I.. -f \$. 1.-015

I. - . bv: A\ l:Sc;, \\Y')c..a..r. ......

Weather Conditions I Recent P. (.}

,: .$..,'{\(\'-'I... b2° ('a,; n ...§2 ~+~cJe.u.{ FvYi. u I

Tune: Started I: 'f S lamJdm) \;Of . ·" : 2.'.i-0 (am/Dffll .Type or· 11: Wllldshield ,--Stte walk) Other

Inspected StatuslCondillo Commelds

1. Vehicular Access 400d v

2. Entrance

a. Gate/Chain ~d

. " .,_3. Landfill Site/Cao:

a Vegetative Cover qp~J "(".e. L.12...,1"\ \-\...., VVI-OweJ ...... v ' b. Standing Water on Cap 'Vl,..Oh/)

c. Animal Distw:baoces Y\OY\.Jl.. d. Woody Vegetation \IL..O'(U/

e. Gully Erosion/Soil Cover ~oc) yv\..:1.(\C( (~(S (o+f c:.o.p) Ar;~ . £ Runoff; Siltation ~oJ

g.Leachat.e ~

v 4. Monitoring Wells (5)

a Locks in place? wlS

b. Condi.tion ofC'.J11mna ~~ -c. Well ID Legible Ul2~

0

5. Comments:

'IC LUC. c,....J o-.Jl.A ov\

WEE.KLY INSPECTION OF RAMSDELL QUARRY LANDFILL

Date: Oc.-h:::,\".la_f 2 ?-DIS

I, : bv: A-I 8',. ,·j/,'nt:.a/

(.J. . ..

Weather Conditions I Recent P. ,. 'iB" clove/q · YJt'J ,a..,,.'n fi?,P v. 2 tf h,s - ' .... ' .,Tune: Started /0: l>U ·~ '-~!Iii l .... 1':f\?o .= ~ _..JIIJ

.. -Type of i. 11: rW"llldsh~ C--SiteWalk'' Other

' -s,·fe wa.,fJ:. NW ~rnt?r CMl"I

v Inspected StatuslCondltlo Comme11ts

1. Vebicular Aca:ss 0r0cd (/

2.Entrance

a. Gate/Chain 9':0l)d ""u.J. ~c....,*e_ oee n for ~wil'lo, . v u . u.3. Landfill Site/Cap- ..~

a. Vegetative Cover ~cJ - c..vrr-etrt fl '1.- lu, i n oi WUJW-'1cf v u ll

b. Standing Water on Cap novi.P

c. Animal Distw:baoces ~ d. Woody Vegetation YU/vu?

e. Gully ErosionlSoil Cover ~d wuY\il, ~s 1u b P,· Ile) a.Fkr ~. u ~

f. Runoff: Siltation ~

g.Leachate ~

4. Monitorinfl Wells (5)

a. Locks in place? u.os b. Condi.ti.on ofC'sunna ~rJ c. Well ID Legiole ~>

LI

5. Comments:

C,cJrO:'wf/

WEEKLY INSPECTION OF RAMSDELL QUARRY LANDFILL

Date: .·~

1. Vehicular Acoess

2. Entrance

a. Gate/Chain

a. Vegetative C.over


c. Animal DistuibaDces

d. Woody Vegetation


f. Runofl: Siltation

g.Leachate

a. Locks inplace?

b. Condltion of

c. Well ID Legtl>le

6. · "onof emedial Action needed:

WEEKLY INSPECTION OF RAMSDELL QUARRY LANDffl..L

Date: .s~~+,.D.VV"'\.h D f \


Date: 9-//-LS -I, bv: A-I Br; //,~c:;e.,- -w

. . ..J . -·Weather Conditions I Recent ; . s.., V'\ ~ oJ.- 7.3 0 IVO r@t'ort+ {'a..,c r"\ \J

• • _JTime: Started J/:o. ~ l 11:30 rz:i::'1- rl)

Tvoeofi. . ... Wmdshield SifeWalk) Other

'

lnapec:lad StatualConditlo Comments

1. Vehicular Access 6\oocJ

2.Entrance

a. Gate/Chain Gsn,,..\ .... _ .3. Landfill Site/Cao w

a Vegetative Cover ~ooeJ '1 '1 Cf. '~ +o '=, ' ~

- -


Date: s~'rt""\k_, 3 2...c:)\S. .I, bv: A\ -e:,, ; \ h V')~


Date:~ - ~'b -d-._6\:)

Ins -!bv: \S ~t-~'\ 'Y\ ~\f\.4

WEEKLY INSPECTION OF RAMSDELL QUARRY LANDn:LL

Date: 20,s.Av"l.cJor-S1 2.. I .. bv•I, - . vA-t Br; I/,' 11 -..12..r

u. . .. . ~00Weather Conditions I Recent :- Sv....,~ /,•a, "1fr"a...in Pr-e v. 'Z. i k.,,,.~. \,J . .............. . . - I.- I, .~Irrune: Started 3:35 _;,d •- 'S:Sv

-~-· -L

·--~ Type of:. . -, .. ·~n....,..,_ SiteWalk Other -

c) ru.Je ~ a.,rot.J~ th>-b.i' ~ cO f- LUC~~ Inspected StatalSfCondltion Comments

1. Vehicular Access a~oJ u

2. Entrance

a. Gate/Chain ct.eocJ lo~cic.~':. c...t.o~ ..) ~ \.o::>~~J u ....,.3. Landfill Site/Cap " -.,

,...._a. Vegetati.ve Cover ....

.\ V~ · V(). ..\-a b' ~

WEEKI.Y INSPECTION OF RAMSDELL QUARRY LANDnLL

Date: 1-tJa..u&"t \~ '2.o I '4-. _. / bv:I, A' o,\ \'~ "'c:J.._' \..J. . .

Weather Condition& I Recent ;-- ,: ""') 0 !=,•t\ './ S,u"lt'\


Date: /lu °lv.5 f 7 70 J.5 -. ~bv:I, A, Br,· I J; 11 c. cv, Weather Conditiona I Recent ; . ·· .. ,:

CJ P"~ tl...i vlo vcJ ~ 73° nn reu:,,rz f ,rc...i rt

.u ' . . . ITime: Started 12:00 (aml.offl) /~:Zc) (amlaml

.. -n-Tvoe of i. .. ·--~ SiteWalk Other ' -

lnspect8d 8tatuelCondltio Commetll:s

1. Vehicular Access oA3od 0

2.Entrance

a. Gate/Chain °!

----


Date: ..L; \\I\--- 3, Z.ol.5 '-' . -" bv:I, A\ -Sr;\ \,V)o. ~

....J . . Weather Conditions I Recent ;-. ,: 5-:,nlf').c,1_ ~c; 0 1'1:n fa.An orev. 2'/ h,s. .- .. I I I' , . ~ I •. --=-,.Time: Started 12:w ·~-~ 12:'-lo IUJ - .. • ..,,.c" ••• '),.Type of it ,.: /W'l'HftMR.-.J SiteWalk other

\...

lnspedad .....ISICondltlon Commelds

1. Vehicular Access o...Dod v

2. Entrance

a Gate/Chain ...... _,....,,.~ Eo..e:.\ Q,. c..:le.. \a..t-c."'- c.d \u~tee) s.o +"-..d . v ~ loc..~ "\"" •'tS. '""' ,~~ \i.:,c.l:. l"T. 3. umdfill Site/Cap ... ..

_, a Vegetative Cover ci.ood \Jee,.. . \JD ~ k.;x~~

u u '-J b. Standing Water on Cap Yl..DY\.() c. Animal Disturbaoces ~ d. Woody Vegetation YUN,()

e. Gully ErosioolSoil Cover \/\..Ov\.Q.

f. RlDlOff: Siltation vw-Q

g.Leachatc ~

f4. Monitorin2 Wells (5) a Locks in place? .J2.S.

b. ~onofC'-ino ~ ......

c. Well ID Legible v\)2.S

\J

5. Comments:

. . . 6. n of- •. • Adion needed:

I


Date: J0 \'""'- '2.t..\ '2. 01S

! bv: \j A\ "13r\ \ \\Yl~.12....r

CJ. . ...Weather Conditions I Recent ; I : ,POA:i\* $..,Y\n...._ 'o~0 .'}'1.Zl ('e.LJ.l Yl-~ '"°>1P ,. • !"\ \j ' ' ~. ~ . ITime: Started z:..oo (am/; I z:2..0 ·-·~,

. ....-..-,~--Twe ot· ,.: / .,... SiteWalk Other ~ -

lnspectad ~ Commelds

1. Vehicular Access ~~d

2. Entrance '--'

a. Gate/Chain .eo.s.+ ~~('!_ - ..... "\' °"-~rt --Car ~ ~~ W£S.t ca c.&e ot ..._ " v 3. Landfill Site/Cao ... _,

a. Vegetative Cover o.ooJ \J Q Q/\ • v ,p --\a .."J h..A';:\h. v u " b. Standing Water on Cap vv:::, v-.Q

c. Animal Disturbances ~ (\A " {)d. Woody Vegetation .

e. Gully Erosioa/Soil Covec ~ f. RlDlOtf, Siltation ~

g.Leacbate . . ~

~.M .... Wells(S)

a. Loeb in place? w:s b. Condi.ti.on of• ....,;.,.•• ~d

0

c. Well ID l..egt"ble t.-\.9'.S>

\J

s. Comments:

. ~· .• Acuon needed: 6. D ·• ··- of .... & £a.::,t ~o.:1-e. n.ud5 chc,.;_ ~ !'.;...,.. /a~l... Jo·d::.. ~.p ........ -4- +'.4 . , -In \a-\-c.~

http:Condi.ti.on

WEEKI..Y INSPECTION OF RAMSDELL QUARRY LANDFILL

Date: j \) \"4 11 2015 I, - _. bv: \\ A- ( r3r,· t J,· t1 c.. (LA

u. ·Weather Conditions I Recent ;-- ,. ClflrJ~rA I i'i ht ,a..,in 72 ° . v . v .____1••Time: Started 10:00 (am/pm) - /0:u)~--· ; L

. .. -;-,') .., w n

'-

ITwe ot:. . . / ---...,._,. ...._.... SiteWalk Other-

........... Stat11slCondNloi1 Comme11ts 1. Vehicular Access CW06

u 2.Entrance

a. Gate/Chain q,ooJ a,cJ: '2!, l O C Ke J v u

3. umdfilJ Site/Cap"" . ·

a. Vegetative Cover q,eroJ Vfl-~. UP +o ~ J-f, fu'e:d, u u I u b. Standing Water on Cap V1...0 Ylf2

c. Animal Disturbances MnO d. Woody Vegetation yt f7YC£)

e. Gully ErosioalSoil Cover Vltn-10 f. Runoff, Siltation Vt..()n0

g.Leacbate ~

f4. Monitoring Wells (5) a. Locks in place? () ,JL.~

b. Condiµon of f"-.ina y~ c. Well ID Legal>J.e ~

u

5. Comments: J t) (' _.\! .() V} f (} I \'"\+-c....l';f- \/~.'::>~l.loIA!~ 0 .

. . . .....6. n of ..... ~· .~ Aedon needed·

;


Date: J0\" \0 '2;015 .l....l

I, bv: At 'Br ; I I;Yl ""...e...r ~

Weather Conditions I Recent ;--• ,. c lovrlu t,b°F t"-t!. '24 f- ,a-,; '7 ~- . V. .. ...,_ ,.Tme: Started 10:10 _mJ I 10: 2 s .. ~-JIJ

.. ·--~ •• ""lr..Tweot;. ... , ......... ...,... SiteWalk Other .....' lnapectecl StablSICondltlun Comments

___ _.l 1. Vehicular Access • 1'.J

v 2. Entrance

a. Gate/Chain ,?l,F)DJ a...r.. -1:-e..5 l O c),corJ u u

3. I.andtiJJ Site/Cao. . ·a. Vegetative Cover - -..- _) \Jee,.. uP "t"O 4' ~St,~. '-' b. Standing Water on Cap

IJ u '\A • -..,.(')

c. Animal Disturbances \\J""° d. Woody Vegetation ~

e. Oully Erosion/Soil Cover ~

f. Runoff, Siltation ~

g.Leacbate . - ()

14. Monitorin2 Wells (5)

a. Locks in place? ""\.A5

b. Condi.tion of

WEEKLY INSPECTION OF RAMSDELL QUARRY LANDffl...L

I, · by: \l A-I 'Br ; I J,· n~

Weather Conditions/ Recent;-._ .:. .. --~,: {o(o O / J ,., ,AcL-- ,,, .1, rr. ·.i"'I 0(-e.d. '2 '-{ h{~

. __ _..-_ -~)~Tvoe or;. ,. .,...._. SiteWalk Other

\-------lnspectltd 8tatuslConditto

1. Vehicular Access evood u

2.Entrance

a. Gate/Chain - -- / . v u3. LandfiU Site/Can T

a. Vegetative Cover ~---cJ uu u

b. Standing Water on Cap 'A O "'-- ()

c. Animal Disturbaoces "'- ~ ,-,.(?

d. WoodyV . .. ~ e. Gully Erosioa/Soil Cover ~

~

f. Runoft Siltation .__ ~..- n

g.Leacbate ·"'--'~ .4. Monitoring Wells (5)

a. Locks in place? "'\,t.S,

b. Condnion Of ('A

WEEKLY INSPECTION OJi' RAMSDELL QUARRY LANDFILL

Date: 20,sJ0n-e.. '1...lo .I, • bv: A\ 'Br:\\,v)~

. . .uWeather Conditions I Recent ; . ,. .'.:,-,0Y'W''\'-"- 11 OF (C.\.r. .Po.n\~pr '"n ,_, •n\

I • & -~ r L """'-'12:55 .-~:,o

-ITune: Started .....a I I

. -~ Twe or;. ... ..,.,.,...... ·-.....--..-.~ SleWalk other (_

lnapecllld StaluelColMliOD Comments

1. Vehicular Access qeVc) u

2.Entrance

a. Gate/Chain loc...6r\

3.1.andfiU Site/Cap hi"- . .., a. Vegetative Cover a.cod '\.k?~ .( 1J'J p .A \ )() +.o 4'

' hJ."""1...,1 u

b. Standing Water on Cap ~

c. Animal Disturbances ~ .

d. WoodyV 'wl..1.~

e. Gully ErosioolSoil Cover ~

f. Runoff, Siltation ~

g.Leacbate

... Wells(S)~-" . . ~

a. Locks in place? llv(..S b. Condnion ofC'.A.ana ~

u

c. Well ID Lem"ble l..AL-11.. \J

5. Comments: fe"'r() \" -- __,~+l(.AI'\ QC>:::, ol.;,~"eJ \-rf).,.,. Q~~ e.J.

. . .6. D of'ft - •. • Action needed:


Date: j vne.. \ 9 '2..01'S

Tme: 11:,0 -~. IJ Corr .. __. I }!z5 -~_;....,,i

Type of;. SiteWalk Other

1. Vehicular A~

2.Entrance \.)

a. Gate/Chain u u

3. Landfil1 Site/Cap T

a. Vegetative Cover u \,.J


c. Animal Distmbances

d. Woody Ve1_~·on

e. Oully ErosioolSoil Cover

£ Runoff: Siltation

g.Leacbate

4. Monitorill2 Wells (5)

a. Locks in place?

b. Condiµ,on ofr .....ina

c. Well ID Leaal>le

s. Comments:

6. n • • ofD . - ,.•.• Action needed·

I

WEEKI.Y INSPECTION OF RAMSDELL QUARRY LANDFILL

Date: Jvt\ e. \1- '2015 .I, _. bv: A, Be ; \ \ , ..,,q,...c.r

1....1 Weather Conditions I Recent :--I

........ ,: -p~,- ..Ll .. 1 d"\udc,\.. ~20 I,~ ""1 \- ,c.....1."' or~". ·v-t \-u' r:l -

Tame: Started 11·.oo . - ·I \,OI' •\..l . \J

JI :c/S · . flJ Twe or. . ,: Windshield rSiteWali> other

lnllpeclld 8tautlCondillon Commelds

1.·Vehicular Access - .) l..)

2.Entrance

a. Gate/Chain c.-cJh~~ loc.te.d 3. I.andfilJ Site/Cap! ... .. u

a. Vegetative Cover ~oJ \J


Date: JJf\JL 5 20,s

- •bv:I, Al "Br~\\ 'Vl a.J2.f

. •. IJ... ,. -,30Weather Conditions I Recent :-. Sv VI "'

---

I

WUKLY INSPECTION OF RAMSDELL QUARRY LANDFILL

Date: MOM 2.g ?.l'J ,; \

_. bv: (-\\ 13, i \, in c...er

.l.! .

Weather Conditions I Recent ;--I . 5'-.lv,V, V\_ 12. 0 Y\Jl.o..\/'-'L- (CM.'('\ D.cd-e.:> lock J 3. I.andfill s~~- ~ '.,.,. v

a. Vegetative Cover o.,,.e-,oc) l".l/'\r. c.,_s \ I

"> ~~ ~ \..)

b. Standing Water on Cap ~N o~\Jed

c. Animal Distumaoces novui. ob~\Ja.J

d. WoodyV . on ~

e. Oully F..rosionlSoil Cover ~

f. Runoff: Siltation ~-o\o~"J

g.Leacbate ~ olo~veJ...

14. Monitorina Wells (5)

a. Locks in place? \A.fl..> b, Condijion OfC'Aana ~J

u c. Well ID I .ea1nle Vi.QC:.,.

!j

5. Comments:

. . . - •. • Action needed·6. D -, or'

WEEKLY INSPECTION OP RAMSDELL QUARRY LAND.FILL

Date: tv\ Glv! 2J z..o,s. . .I, _. bv: A, ~; \ \ \ Y\CO_r

9 ·- .Weather Conditions I Recent ;--. ,: too"' c:....lo


Date: 1"10

WEEKI,Y INSPECTION OP RAMSDELL QUARRY LANDFILL

Date: tv1 c......, 8 20 ,.s I .I, bv: A1 Be ~ \ \ , Y\ c r12

. ~ .. -· ,BoWeather Conditions I Recent :--. . s ... V'\""-"" : V\...D .fee n y'\.± D(€c_',D . I. . .!Tune: Started \O;~ ~ \0:£0

Tweofit .. :~~· SiteWalk Other

lnepectad StatualCondillo Camme11ta

1. Vehicular Access Qf"")od

u

2.Entrance

a. Gate/Chain ~oc) q.cu\e_"> \ oc...\:.or)

v u.3.l.andfiHSite/CapT ,y

a. Vegetative Cover ~c:J v

b. Standing Water on Cap "'\It~ c. ADuna, Disturbances ~ d. Woody Vegetation ~

e. Gully Erosion/Soil Cover ~

f. Runoff: Siltation ~

g.Leachate ~

14. Monitorin2 Wells (5) a. Locks in place? '11-> b. Condiµon ofC'.JLuno ~ .., c. Well ID' .-hie '-Vl- ...

.....

s. Comments:

. .. . .... ~- n of..... •. • Action nmled:

'

WEEKI..Y INSPECTION OF RAMSDELL QUARRY LANDFILL

Date: Mo-t \ . 2Dl5

I, . bv: Al t3r;l /,v,~r u .. ..Weather Conditions I Recent ;-. ,:

Tune: Started 11:1...s -~ ,\ _..... I &,2 0 • ::,vnn

- -


Date: '~Ot'"i I 23 2015 lnsoected bv: (-JI ,3, ,· !J,·n < o.,,, Weather Conditions I Recent Preci~ion: J,~ 1-? f ::>vz-ow / TG...-\ n- c)..ovc/1,1 37

11

Time: Started 10:35 '0-m) Com Dieted J0.'$0 ~·-ft ..... ~.,..,.n) Type of;. ··on: ,,,-Wtndsh~ Site Walk Other

d. Woody Vegetation . ·- "-e. Gully Erosion/Soil Cover a,.o-od

u

f. Runoff, Siltation ~,(")-f')J g. Leachate ~-

u - -J

l)

4. Monitorin.2 Wells (5)

a. Locks in place? 1-" c....

b. Condition ofCasing ~c) u

c. Well ID Legible vULC... u

5. Comments:

& •6. Description ofO '!lemedial Action needed:

~ (\ "nr.


Date: Aor,. l 17 zo,s. Ins "bv: Al Mr; JJi' Y?c. 0/7

u.Weather Conditions I Recent P, _ . . ••• ~a·F vlovd'A. r c..... i Y? A ~ .f./1 i rt.~ /2ttJj v. Z '1 '\.A.A -. -· (am/pm) u ITime: Started //.'~ ....~..,..., Completed ' u

Type of ins- - ~· n: (Windshield Site Walk Other vev-..-t,J .!>; +c. Lc..)a.J ..

ovh.;~ ~.e..,,, c..J;) I

Inspected Status/Condition Comments

1. Vehicular Access ~ad u

2. Entrance

a. Gate/Chain \o~J.. c.-Ood ' v

3. Landfil1 Site/Cap Integrity

a. Vegetative Cover ~od u

b. Standing Water on Cap "' -'""' (') 0 k,~"e. J

c. Animal Disturbances 'V\.~O DY?~v-e.lJ t":l. -- ___,d. Woody Vegetation

...... " e. Gully Erosion/Soil Cover ""-.,.e,-vJ

u f. Runoff, Siltation a..,-0oc)

u g. Leachate (1,afir)

u 4. Monitoring Wells (5)

a. Locks in place? (..{ ..Q_ ~

b. Condition ofCasing 0 Ct .-.}-f)d 0

c. Well ID Legible c,t Cl

WEEKI,Y INSPECTION O.F RAMSDELL QUARRY LAND.FILL

Date: Al')(",·/ JO 20/S,I _. bv:I

. . . It.Weather Conditions I Recent -;-• 57° /?Ge.Av, (h..ee..11"" J +;~) {.),-evicJv.S z da.......5

v II ./"""\, . . ... ITune: Started II! 10 ._ __JJJ

,

,,:as le 1..1..Jl.~ u

s. Comments: .... "'t


Date: Aa,J 2 I . 20,s

Ins:: - _. bv•- . At ?5r,·1Iin 1?it2, Weather Conditions I Recent Precioiti'tion: 00 ° o

WEEKI.Y INSPECTION OF RAMSDELL QUARRY LANDFILL

Date: Mn f\r.V\ 21 Z.01$ '

I, ·bv: Al 1:fr,· / /in ero r zqoWeather Conditions I Recent P,(} ;.. · ,: I,., h + :5YUJw' .,

,.:::::.',__ ,,,.....--...,,Time: Started 11:20 U3111f .... ll/ Completed I t:'{o ·-IJll f,11 /1J-.Type of ins -,: (Windshield~ Site Watk Other

__,,........


1. Vehicular Access 6\-0C'.>d u

2. Entrance G\-06d

a. Gate/Chain \:>Jt.i GI_,. +es l C)c...6 ) u

3. Landfill Site/Cap lnte2J'ity

a. Vegetative Cover ~J u

b. Standing Water on Cap q.-Qod

c. Animal Distmbances ~od u

d. Woody Vegetation C\Oad u •

e. Gully Erosion/Soil Cover 0~ Jr (" v

f. Runoff, Siltation C>ifY')r_

g. Leachate ~o~J v

4. Monitoring Wells (5)

a. Locks in place? v\Q.S,

b. Condition ofCasing ~~j c. Well ID Legi'ble ~"

\J

5. Comments:

.6. Description of n ""' •. ~ Action needed: 3 Areas f'.RJ}C

- -


Date: Mo./\c.,\n 20 'Z-o1.S

Inspected by: A I !3,r"i°/ J.-.,,.,,M (.)

Weather Conditions I Recent Precipitation: Cl oud'1 / , c, J,..if yvt....-iS f 37° u v

Time: Started I/! ID (@Dllpm) Completed 1/:30 ~/pm)

Type of insoection: r'Windshi~ Site Walk Other '


1. Vehicular Access C\oad


Date: Md.l)c...,\,,.. 13 '2-015 .

l,~edbv: A/ S,,· J/iY'}o,,L.f'

u ... -Weather Conditions I Recent P on: C) OtJd "L ~i) " u I

Time: Started IZ: 1S Cam/mffl ComDieted /2:35 (am/tin)

Tvce of i, .. ,windshield) Site Walk Other \.


I. Vehicular Access ~o6d 2.Entrance

a. Gate/Chain (;rood

3. Landfill Site/Cao Integrity

a. Vegetative Cover no+ v'i~; blR WU>.sf /'( ( "J' 'lo ·Jo ) !:>Jtto,..) ui v~f b. Standing Water on Cap 'IL()t ,1,:Sil::,/p / c. Animal Disturbances K.i> f- v.,-S ; b (o d. Woody Vegetation 111.-0 + v' ,':,; b l_p

I

I e. Gully Erosion/Soil Cover .-u>+ ilj$, t,"' f. Runoff, Siltation 'V\..D t- vi!,; b ~ g. Leachate .........., +- v,.s; b4' ~

4. Monitorill2 Wells (5)

a. Locks in place? 0\,,0 oJ I i..µ.s u

b. Condition ofCasing "'v~. u

· c. Well ID Legible t.'1~S

v

5. Comments:

6. Description ofR • _/D ~· ·' Action needed:

',¥ Ea.:~h~.,"" S-w-,


Date: l'I\ CULJ"l h , '2.D 15'

IJ~edbv: Al 13r~ \ h""'lc:..oJ-Weather Conditions I Recent;-;-_:. . .,,: /C}D F '> l ' s h-0 c..J c...D .., IV)

Time: Started IZ: OC> lam/Dffl) Com · · ~ 12:zo ,--,J6m)

Type of;, ·on: ,,.--W1ndshleld Site Walk Other

'


1. Vehicular Access roa.cl ,.s o\ov.:ieJ 11n!es a...e..~,olav»J~' ,,," 2. Entrance

a. Gate/Chain \oc.uJ acJ:e ..,, sn:uwe.J '"' 3~ Landfi11 Site/Cap Integrity

a. Vegetative Cover t\.J\-- Vis: ~lp lo...vid-+\ \l is Si.t...0w-c:.vvQNIJ ~ +'..-a"'9"' I\ " ""b. Standing Water on Cap VLO-\: \J i s,l I:,.lo

c. Animal Disturbances l,U)+ ",s-.1.;.la • \\ ,, .,

d. Woody Vegetation


u:.)°t

Y\Oi"

v ; s ', l.;,le

'llj5',l.:.lo

,.

.. ,,

.. " ..

"

..

f. Runoff, Siltation

g. Leachate

ltt.l't"

rto-l.

.Jis,b~

Iii 51 l:,lo

,,

. ,,

IA

,,

.. ~

.

4. Monito~ Wells (5)

a. Locks in place? ~':, v

b. Condition ofCasinR ~ odJ ......

c. Well ID Legible l.1t.-.$ u

5. Comments:

. ID6. Description of'""~- _.. • Action needed: Eo..?-\-e. r ..r'\ +-e. VJ u:, +on wirCL o.f S·wi '"'~-- ~ .....Ii\ +e."'c..: le

./

1.C.e..v1rn b

___


Date: FrtJnu F~h. 21 2.,ot~•

Inspected by: A\ :Br;\\ ,-nc;e.r-Weather Conditions I Recent Preci · ,--,. "(!) ,ece.'ll'l.t Sl'\.OW~ Q O (sVt.Ot.,.J covett ) ,0. Time: Started ,o~4o (GmJ/pm) Com .. ~ ,,:ou ((ab,.......'--n)

-Type of n ·:n: JNindshieJ(I Site Walk Other

....


1. Vehicular Access f~c- R.c..wis.At0\l ~~) ~ J1ln..ueJ' \.\·w\.atd Jr\..tc:_c;~ '

2. Entrance

a. Gate/Chain - ..1 u

3. Landfill Site/Cap Integrity \a..-J~\\ cov~J w\ -svwv.J ("> \') a. Vegetative Cover ~i\e. ObS,av~ ~ -\-,re~

-b. Standing Water on Cap \M.)-v,


Date: Fr; Jl1...J F-e.Jo


Date: ~v~'1- /3. z..o,s l1~edbv: wed e:.~ a.c:c.~is."-Ci '.... 2. Entrance

a. Gate/Chain '°'ood-3. Landfill Site/Cao Integrity

a. Vegetative Cover Y'\-bt- ";:,'\\;,\.e_ ~\-\-e.. \!, :,.~- (.()v eAad b. Standing Water on Cap ""'-a\- '1 ,~·, \,U2 ... .. c. Animal Distmbances vu,\ ",~··l;:.Lcz..

,.. I d. Woody Vegetation G:t.-.oJ-e. Gully Erosion/Soil Cover ~-\- -.J,5~ \p\o .s:..\....::. ,s. C:..IAJ::,w c..oJQ,,Qrl

. f. Runoff, Siltation ""o-\ '1;S,~.P \ ... ,_

" g. Leachate nn-\- '1i5\'d..P ...

,._ .. 4. Monitoring Wells (5)

a. Locks in place? I ).A C...,

b. Condition ofCasing 0 - ~ - ":l. c. Well ID Legible

u~, \.l

5. Comments:

,...6. Descri.Dtion of~ -- •• •1 Action needed;

.. I 1 (.J J W, (4!? o+- e..a. !:>-h;,


Date: F..p 1,,. '? 201


Date: Ja. ..00..,"f 3o, 2.DIS

Inspected by: A1 'Br, I\ ,Y'l-=i 2-C

-~

Weather Conditions I Recent Precipitation: ,·1 u. \ i"l \,\-\: s ~"" (""' 2·3 Sl'Ulw \~ \c.., \,,le,

d. Woody Vegetation ~

e. Gully Erosion/Soil Cover ~ vi~,b~

f. Runoff, Siltation ~ v-.5,61(;,

g. Leachate ~ visib~


a. Locks in place? ua_~

b. Condition ofCasing ad u

c. Well ID Legible t.J\9-S ..

5. Comments: RQL '\ 5 Sl'U>v..> c..av ~d a...v,.ttY +


Date: _j (~ .(\ IIn tu-..- 2.'3 2c)15 Inspected by: A\ Br~\ t nc..n.r

0 2..-C> ,., 3 q ,(21Weather Conditions I Recent Precipitation: 'o ' G,L.o v j "\ .s )'\..() w OV"\ IJ_ I-,psTime: Started 10\~ _(~m) Completed Jim/pm)

Type of inspection: ,,-Wincfshield/ Site Walk Other -···


1. Vehicular Access a..-ind J

2. Entrance

a. Gate/Chain qood

3. Landfill Site/Cap Integrity 5~ C...CNQI\Q~

a. Vegetative Cover II

b. Standing Water on Cap l I

c. Animal Disturbances 'I

d. Woody Vegetation \\

e. Gully Erosion/Soil Cover s ee w-m~ ho,(o..J f. Runoff, Siltation - {


Date:

leted ~·. 33 Other


1. Vehicular Access

2. Entrance

a. Gate/Chain

3. Landfill Site/Cap Integrity

a. Vegetative Cover


c. Animal Disturbances

d. Woody Vegetation

e. Gully Erosion/Soil Cover ~ t,,-.--~~~~~~~~~~-f-;i.....,;~..........~~~1L41,-.q..u..~-.\-~~~~~~~~~~~~--1

f. Runoff, Siltation

g. Leachate


a. Locks in place?

b. Condition of Casing

c. Well ID Legible

5. Comments:

6. Description ofRepairs/Remedial Action needed:

WEEKI.. Y INSPECTION OF RAMSDELL QUARRY LANDFILL

Date: Je1.-r, \,) ClJv:I., " 1.o\,S Inspected by: A.Br~\ \,Y)c.a,

" Weather Conditions I Recent Precipitation: \t, 0


Date: So P.ec.e""" ba, 20\ L/ lnsoected bv: A\ lSr~\ h"'-~or . \Sm~ t\1'1ld (ol-\A12..JcJ

u

Weather Conditions I Recent Precipitation: On.-.k-lu C::.1-v,.ntA 2no II

Time: Started l'.IS


Date: I)e (.'l IO\\-;;,.£!./ ·2 "-\ . '2.o 1l(

Inspected by: At fr;\\,Y1C..O/" u

Weather Conditions I Recent Precipitation: 52° \\',; ""'+ ~.$+-Time: Started q:oo cc. .a.~-\


Date: 1:::e c...e VT')b.e , \ 9 , '2.o , '-( 4lnsoected by: A\ 'i:!:,,c--, \ '''°'~V ~~ec:.c..c... \-\.c....V'\4~

- '-J Weather Conditions I Recent Precipitation: c..\o~a~ a.o·

'2. 1 1-:o \)

z:YsTime: Started V'\tl ob~ved

c. Animal Disturbances ~ do':::f2A.,JeJ d. Woody Vegetation o...ood \'Le""2. o hSa.a.,1e,l ~ C:.CJ';J,- . e. Gully Erosion/Soil Cover AA.,-oJ .... r>re.'1 tc..:>s.\~. \,t,,.4,o A' e...od..Dd f. Runoff, Siltation vt.o\d'00""2 g. Leachate Y\-C>v-.e c~"ed


a Locks in place? \Al!,':::,

b. Condition of Casing ~d ... c. Well ID Legible ~::,-

-~ 5. Comments: ~:11< +e...... ,. 0 \Vl+c...c...\- .&1 _,, .. a+ c._., \:,rob "' -\oo '-Al~~ e_ ( l \oc..._.t.:IN\)

oc..~-\- e:.1 J...a o+- ~e.vi CJ2 ,.\ Cl.A.ao...,


~ -ce.,o,.\,,,J ,.. - -- a.. (3,) -tc> be +:, \\e J WhQ"' c..nDrnJeJ ..C:i\\ J'ir-\- ,s o.va.ll.cd..lo .

.

·~

http:o.va.ll.cdhttp:o+-~e.vi


Date: D.e.c e )'>"\\,.Q.r I Z... • Zzn '-f

lnsoected bv: Al 'Br;\"""~I .., Weather Conditions I Recent Precipitation: 308 c..\o.JJ~ Y\.C f-e.Cef\+ nre.c...Xo.

\J 10·.~ l('.o 5Time: Started _(~pm) Completed Jam/pm)

Tvoe of insoection: (WindshiekLJ Site Walk Other


1. Vehicular Access o.ood ..., 2. Entrance

a. Gate/Chain "\cod bcr+~ q~~ \oc..\:eJ ...., 3. Landfill Site/Cap Integrity

a. Vegetative Cover ~J b. Standing Water on Cap "'/1..c-Nl. 0 b~ve.J c. Animal Disturbances ~ o\..::>5,Q.r,.ved

d. Woody Vegetation Oiecd ~~ olo~ve.J ,.,,,_ c~ ~a e. Gully Erosion/Soil Cover a.r.,.,J ""'nre..vtoL.)C'.,.\" ..-.o\eJ ,en:,~ O,...,.A"'-S ...., . . f. Runoff, Siltation ~ ~t-e9

g. Leachate ~ 0~11eJ

4. Monitoring Wells (5) '

a Locks in place? '\(ls-b. Condition ofCasing ~J

v

c. Well ID Legible v\a.? \J

5. Comments:

ff ..,, _c,,"' ,.. " \ "'k,.+


* t.rnW~ (~) ..L... \,.,. ~i\~J ..l\.vJ 'V\ o_.nnrav~ Ci ll ch,+ ·,s I '

Q.Jn !\,.W11


Date: s \) -L l- ~ C::i\ \..\ Inspected by: ~ Q'"V~\ \\. ~\l'\t'1. f J\\ ~'("·,\\·\''f\.1\



593

594

595

596

597

598

Appendix B 599

RQL Soil Repair Memo 600

601

Memo To: Tim Morgan, State Environmental Supervisor

From: Al Brillinger, Program Manager, Vista Sciences Corporation

cc: Katie Tait (OHARNG), Kevin Sedlak (NGB), Quyet C. La (USACE)

Date: January 23, 2015

Re: Camp Ravenna Ramsdell Quarry Landfill Cap Repairs

Vista Sciences Corporation (VSC) filled 3 areas at the Ramsdell Quarry Landfill (RQL) with clean, approved soil on January 21, 2015. A drawing of the RQL and the repaired areas is attached to this memo.

Two (2) of the areas (labeled "A" and "B" on the attached figure) were located on the Ramsdell Quarry Landfill cap, and consisted of shallow (

/ I

I ~

" I c; ~ ~ \ ~ d

\ T" ... 6 \ ,I) c; i \ ~ - \ ~ j \ i \ ":;)

~ ~

5 I --,:..t:. 1 ~

i;:

-1 \ ..,.. ... d \ ? 0 - \

/ /

----

"\

\ J

- - ..........

I \

i\ 1 ~

........

\ \ J

/ uO

p II

~

i 'D 0 _. 0 rJ QI _. - '&. t'I

1 r" ..._ d ., t; -d ·~ -,

FIELD CHANGE REQUEST (FCR) FCR-RV AAPB1200-002

FCR NO. FCR-RVAAPB1200-002 DATE INITIATED 10/24/14 PROJECT Building 1200 and Anchor Test Area Remedial Action CONTRACT NO. GSA Contract No. W912QR-04-D-0028 Delivery Order No. 0001

REQUESTOR IDENTIFICATION NAME Jed Thomas ORGANIZATION --Leidos PHONE 330-405-5802 --;::::.__--TITLE Deputy Project Manager SIGNATURE ;__w __ l...i:_-.:.+z'!..~~==::---------BASELINE IDENTIFICATION

BASELINE($) AFFECTED D Cost D Scope D Milestone igi Method of Accomplishment

AFFECTED DOCUMENT (TITLE, NUMBER AND SECTION) Remedial Design for Soil, Sediment. and Surface Water at RV AAP-13 Building 1200 and RV AAP-48

Anchor Test Area {Section 8.1)

DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE: Section 8.1 of the referenced Remedial Design indicates the a previous backfill source will be utilized for backfill once the cleanup goals are attained during the soil excavation at the Building 1200 and Anchor Test Area AOCs. However, the backfill source specified in the Remedial Design is no longer available for use. Accordingly, Leidos identified and sampled a new backfill source at Patrick Excavating and Trucking at 5839 State Route 5, Ravenna, Ohio.

On September 11, 2014, the staged backfill source at Patrick Excavating and Trucking was sampled. One ISM sample {B12bf-060M-0014M-SO) was collected and analyzed for RVAAP full suite parameters except voes. One discrete sample {B12bf-060-0015-SO) was collected and analyzed for voes.

The results of the analyses are attached to this FeR. Data was screened using the RVAAP surface soil background values and Resident Receptor cleanup goals (CUGs) at 10-6 risk. The EPA Regional Screening Level for resident for soil {10-6 risk) (May 2014) was used if an analyte did not have a CUG. A brief summary of the results are presented below.

1) All analyte concentrations were below either the surface background values or the screening level.

2) All pesticide. PCB, explosive, and VOC analyte concentrations were either not detectable or had estimated concentrations.

3) All SVOC analyte concentrations were either not detectable or were below the screening level. with the exception of benzo

draft fy 2015 annual land use control monitoring report ...mec munitions and explosives of concern...

Documents