draft design report / environmental assessment · draft design report / environmental assessment...

DRAFT DESIGN REPORT /ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

APPENDIX IMISCELLANEOUS

U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONANDREW M. CUOMO, Governor JOAN MCDONALD, Commissioner

Highway ProjectP.I.N. 4390.13

NYS Route 390/I-490/NYS Route 31Interchange Improvements

Monroe CountyTown of Gates, Town of Greece and

City of Rochester


PROJECT HISTORY

NYS 390 / I-490 / NYS 31 Interchange Improvements Draft Design Report / Environmental Assessment PIN 4390.13

1

Project HistoryThe following is a summary of the project’s evolution up to the start of Preliminary Design Phases I-IV asdefined in the New York State Department of Transportation’s (NYSDOT or Department) ProjectDevelopment Manual (PDM). Design Phases I-IV involves the steps necessary to determine what projectimprovements should be built and includes environmental classification, public involvement andalternative development. Design Phases I-IV will culminate with the final publication of this report andidentification of a Preferred Alternative. Design Phases V-VI complete the final (or detailed) design of thepreferred alternative.

A Major Investment Study (MIS), as required at the time by the Intermodal Surface TransportationEfficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA), was conducted by the NYSDOT and completed in 1998. The MISaddressed pavement and bridge conditions as well as traffic operations and safety along the NY 390corridor from I-490 to NY 104. The MIS Report was called “Route 390, From I-490 to Route 104, MajorInvestment Study – Initial Range of Alternatives & Screening”. The MIS involved the public in theplanning process, evaluated environmental issues, and considered a range of multi-modal solutions. Thepurpose of the MIS was to insure that all reasonable solutions to address transportation problems wereidentified, analyzed, and the information presented to community decision-makers. The MISrecommended dropping all but the following three alternatives from further consideration:

1. Rehabilitate/Reconstruct NYS Route 3902. Rehabilitate/Reconstruct NYS Route 390 with 390/490 interchange improvements3. Rehabilitate/Reconstruct NYS Route 390 with 390/490 interchange improvements and one

additional through lane in each direction from I-490 to Route 104 (widening from 6 to 8 lanes)

The Genesee Transportation Council (GTC), designated as the Metropolitan Planning Organization(MPO) for the Genesee-Finger Lakes Region, published Resolution 98-5 on September 9, 1998, whichdirected NYSDOT to continue with detailed analysis of the three remaining alternatives. A copy of theMIS resolution and the MIS are included in Appendix A of the Expanded Project Proposal (EPP), datedApril 2003.

The NYSDOT prepared the EPP to document the development and evaluation of the three alternativesand provide recommendations for advancement to the preliminary design phase (Phases I-IV). The EPPwas called “NY Route 390 Project – Expanded Project Proposal” (PIN 4040.38) and published in April2003. The EPP further evaluated these alternatives as well as additional options and sub-options. TheEPP includes alternatives for mainline NY 390, all interchanges from the 390/490 interchange to the NY390/NY 104 interchange, and alternatives along NY 31 from Long Pond Road to the City of Rochestermunicipal boundary line.

Also included in the EPP are alternatives for a multi-use trail linking the NY 390 Trail to the Erie CanalHeritage Trail (Canalway Trail). The NY 390 Trail runs along NY 390 north of NY 104 and the CanalwayTrail crosses under NY 390 just south of Lexington Avenue. This multi-use trail has since been separatedfrom this project as a standalone P.I.N. (See Section 2.2.1.3. for further discussion). All alternativesconsidered are described and summarized in Chapter III of the EPP.

The EPP recommended the following two major build alternatives for the 390/490 and 390/31interchanges as feasible alternatives to improve the transportation system:

1. Alternative 2: Improved Three Level NYS Route 390/490 Interchange2. Alternative 3: Improved Three Level NYS Route 390/490 Interchange with Single Point Urban

Interchange at NYS Route 31

Alternative 2 included reconstructing NY 390 with six (6) mainline lanes from Lyell Avenue to NY 104,construction of auxiliary lanes connecting on and off ramps between Lyell Avenue and Ridgeway Avenue,an improved three level 390/490 interchange, and minor improvements to the Lexington Avenue,Ridgeway Avenue, and NY 104 interchanges. Alternative 3 had the same features as Alternative 2


2

except that the 390/31 interchange was to be reconstructed as a Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI),which controls traffic entering and exiting the expressway with one centrally located traffic signal.

Subsequent to the publication of the EPP, the preliminary design process commenced (Phases I-IV)culminating with the “NYS Route 390, Trolley Boulevard to NYS Route 104 – Draft Design Report”, datedNovember 2005. The report was never completed or published as emerging program priorities and fiscalconstraints state wide led the NYSDOT and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to focus their effortson developing alternatives for the 390/490 and 390/31 interchanges that address critical non-standardgeometric features and operational deficiencies directly affecting motorist safety in a prioritized, costeffective manner. Furthermore, in 2001, the shoulders of the NY 390 mainline were resurfaced, and in2003, after the development of the EPP, mainline NY 390 was resurfaced between Lyell Avenue and NY104, improving ride quality and reducing the frequency of complaints received from the public.

In August 2005, a re-evaluation study was initiated culminating with the “NYS Route 390 Project –Expanded Project Proposal Amendment”. The report was never completed or published as the projectwas put on hold in October 2006. The re-evaluation study introduced and compared several new andrevised interchange improvement alternatives that provided the greatest possible benefit for the costincurred, which could be built in a staged manner. Among the highest priorities identified were theoperational and safety issues associated with the northbound and southbound weaving areas on NY 390between I-490 and Lyell Avenue. The turbulence and associated accident patterns experienced withinthese weaving sections is a by-product of the short interchange separation between what is truly onesystem-to-system connection (390/490) and one system-to-service connection (390/31).

The re-evaluation was performed in close coordination between the NYSDOT and FHWA, and inaccordance with FHWA 23 CFR 771.129 Re-evaluation, SEQR 17 NYCRR Part 15 Regulations, and theNYSDOT Project Development Manual (PDM) Appendix 11. All alternatives considered in the EPPAmendment are described and summarized in Chapter 3 of this report.

A Value Engineering (VE) study was conducted in September 2007 by an independent team to evaluatethe alternatives presented in the unpublished EPP Amendment. This is standard practice on large-scaleprojects such as this one. The objective of the study was to assess existing and new ideas, and generatecombinations of changes that address the basic highway and interchange functions, and result in the bestvalue considering non-economic benefits and life cycle costs. Goals included elimination of NB weave,improve or eliminate SB weave, minimize ROW acquisition, achieve LOS D to E, reduce accidents, andpreserve existing bridges. The VE study culminated with the publishing of the “NYS Route 390/I-490Interchange - Value Engineering Study Report”, dated September 2007. The VE team determined that allof the original design alternatives depicted in Appendix B of the VE Report would benefit from additionalimprovement elements to provide complete solutions. Only the reconstruction of the entire interchange(Alternative 6) eliminates all of the current deficiencies. However, the team rejected Alternative 6because of its complexity and cost. Only two alternatives offered reasonable cost-effective solutions; thecombined Alternative 2A & 2B and the combined Alternative 3A & 3B. The VE team revised the costs ofthese two alternatives to include the modified improvement elements, for comparing them to the costs ofthe new VE alternatives.

The VE team also developed two new alternatives (V-A and V-B) for consideration by NYSDOT and thedesign team. Both alternatives addressed the two most critical deficiencies in the interchange that causethe most accidents and congestion, the northbound and southbound weave areas. Both alternatives alsoprovided dedicated lanes for NB and SB through traffic and retained most of the existing infrastructure.Alternative V-A, which eliminated the NB weave and improved the SB weave, appeared to be thepreferred alternative because of its lower capital cost. It was also determined that Alternative V-A couldbe constructed in three phases at a cost of roughly $30 million per phase. One downside of thisalternative was that several properties had to be acquired in the northwest quadrant of the 390/31interchange to construct the loop ramp to southbound NY 390. All alternatives considered in the VEReport are described and summarized in Chapter 3 of this report.

Subsequent to the VE Study, the Department performed a validation review of Alternatives V-A and V-B.The validation review revealed that generally the VE alternatives would work acceptably. Some


3

adjustments had to be made to meet American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials(AASHTO) ramp terminal spacing requirements, and in some cases the limits of work had to be extended.The Department rejected Alternative V-B due to the extended southerly work limits on I-390, resulting inthe need to replace the Buffalo Road and CSX bridges. In May 2008, the Departments’ recommendationwas to maintain Alternative V-A, but merge it with part of Alternative V-B (Lee Road exit flyover bridgeconfiguration). This combined alternative was named A1.

In September 2010, the Preliminary design process commenced (i.e. Phases I-IV), which will culminatewith the final publication of this report and identification of a Preferred Alternative.

The project is not part of an approved Congestion Management Process (CMP), nor has it followed theInterim Congestion Management System (ICMS) process. See Section 2.2.2.4 for further discussion onthis topic and transportation plans.

Public Involvement activities during the EPP phase of the project are summarized in Appendix G.Meeting Minutes for the public meetings held during the EPP phase are included in Appendix B of theExpanded Project Proposal (EPP), dated April 2003.

As indicated in Section 1.7, the Public Involvement Process resumed in 2010 for Phases I-IV of therefined project study area (390/490 and 390/31 interchanges). Meeting Minutes for all public involvementactivities that occurred during the preliminary design phase (Phase I-IV) are included in Appendix G.


EXISTING GUIDE RAILING, MEDIAN BARRIERS,AND IMPACT ATTENUATORS

Exhibit 2.3.3.8-1 I-390 Northbound

Existing Guide Railing, Median Barriers, and Impact Attenuators

Type Location/Side Length (ft) Condition

Corrugated Guide Rail

Right side, south of Conrail bridge to

Conrail bridge 670 Good, several posts out

Box Beam Guide Rail

Right side, Conrail bridge to I-390 NB/SB

diverge 1745 Good, several posts out

Corrugated Beam Median Barrier

Left side south of Conrail Bridge to I-390

NB/SB diverge 2160 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Left side, Ramp SE to I-490 EB

823 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Right side, Ramp SE to I-490 EB

328 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Left side, ramp SW to I-490 WB

174 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Right side, ramp SW to I-490 WB

406 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Left side, I-490 WB to ramp WN

655 Good, several posts out

Box Beam Guide Rail

Right side, I-490 WB to ramp EN

229 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Right side, ramp EN to ramp DD

2055 Good

Exhibit 2.3.3.8-2 I-390 Southbound



Box Beam Guide Rail

Right side, south of Conrail Bridge

440 Good


Right side, north of Conrail bridge

984 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Right side, north of Conrail bridge

863 Good


Left side, south of Conrail bridge

2301 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Right side, adjacent to I-490 EB

459 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Left side, adjacent to I-490 EB

409 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Left side, adjacent to I-490 WB

256 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Right side, adjacent to I-490 WB

235 Poor, upstream end has been struck,

many posts missing

Exhibit 2.3.3.8-3 NYS Route 390 Northbound



Box Beam Guide Rail

Left side, ramp WN to Lyell Avenue

888 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Right side, ramp DD to ramp DE

458 Good

Box Beam Median Barrier

Left side, Lyell Avenue bridge pier

109 Fair-Good, corroded


Right side, Lyell Avenue to ramp DA

281 Fair, bent


Left side, ramp DA merge

164 Poor, corroded


Right side, south of Trolley Blvd.

962 Poor to fair, several 150’-200’ sections

deformed


Left side, south of Trolley Blvd.

258 Poor-Fair, corroded


Left side, north of Trolley Blvd.

258 Fair, corroded


Left side, south of Erie Canal

228 Fair, corroded

Box Beam Guide Rail

Right side, Trolley Blvd to Erie Canal

548 Fair, corroded


Left side, north of Erie Canal

57 Fair, corroded

Box Beam Guide Rail

Right side, north of Erie Canal

57 Fair, corroded


Right side, ramp EA to Lexington Ave

409 Fair, corroded


Left side, ramp EA to Lexington Ave

293 Fair, corroded

Box Beam Guide Rail

Right side, ramp EA to Lexington Ave

132 Fair, corroded

Exhibit 2.3.3.8-4 NYS Route 390 Southbound




Right side, between ramp DC and Lyell Ave

273 Poor, 50’ – 100’ missing posts and out

of alignment

Corrugated Median Barrier

Left side, between ramp DC and Lyell Ave

40 Good


Right side, between Lyell Ave and ramp DB

261 Fair


Left side, between Lyell Ave and ramp DB

136 Fair, corroded


Left side, adjacent to ramp DB

171 Good


Right side, between Trolley Blvd and ramp

DB 839 Fair, corroded

Box Beam Guide Rail

Right side, south of Trolley Blvd

105 Fair, corroded

Box Beam Guide Rail

Right side, adjacent to Erie Canal bridge

921 Fair, corroded

Box Beam Guide Rail

Left side, north of Erie Canal bridge

146 Fair

Box Beam Guide Rail

Right side, between Lexington Ave and

ramp EC 189 Good

Exhibit 2.3.3.8-5 I-490 Eastbound



Box Beam Guide Rail

Right side, between Howard Road and

ramp WN 892 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Left side, between ramp WN and I-390 SB

1185 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Right side, between ramp WS and I-390 SB

210 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Left side, between I-390 SB and ramp NE

150 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Right Side, between I-390 SB and ramp NE

531 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Left side, east of bridge over I-390 NB

82 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Left side, between ramp SE and Erie Canal

379 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Right side, between ramp SE and Erie Canal

379 Good

Concrete Median Barrier

Between Erie Canal and rail bridge

1603 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Right side, adjacent to concrete barrier

121 Good

Concrete Barrier Right side, between Erie Canal and rail

bridge 690 Good

Exhibit 2.3.3.8-6 I-490 Westbound



Box Beam Guide Rail

Right side, between Howard Rd & ramp NW

752 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail/Median Barrier

Left side, between Howard Rd & ramp NW

1805 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Right side, between ramp NW & WN

113 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Left side, between ramp NW and WN

115 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Right side, between ramp WN and SW

253 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Right side, between ramp SW and EN

247 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Left side, between ramp SW and EN

262 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Left side, between ramp EN and SW

381 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Right side, between Erie Canal and ramp EN

276 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Left side, between Erie Canal and ramp EN

232 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Left side, east of Erie Canal

343 Fair, overall good condition but end is

damaged due to vehicle strike

Box Beam Guide Rail

Right side, east of Erie Canal

335 Good

Concrete Barrier Right side, between Erie Canal and rail

bridge 768 Good

Exhibit 2.3.3.8-7 I-390/I-490 Ramps



Box Beam Guide Rail

Ramp SE, right side 1640 Fair overall, posts out in several

locations

Box Beam Guide Rail

Ramp SE, left side 675 Fair, many posts out

Box Beam Guide Rail

Ramp WS, right side 507 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Ramp NE, left side 285 Fair, impact attenuator damaged

Box Beam Guide Rail

Ramp NE, left side 384 Fair, impact attenuator damaged

Box Beam Guide Rail

Ramp NE, right side 303 Fair

Box Beam Guide Rail/Concrete

Barrier Ramp ES, right side 108

Fair, temporary concrete barrier may not meet flare rate requirements

Box Beam Guide Rail

Ramp ES, left side 128 Fair

Box Beam Guide Rail

Ramp SW, left side, end of ramp

212 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Ramp SW, left side 709 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Ramp SW, right side 537 Poor, impact attenuator damaged,

many posts out


Ramp EN, right side 434 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Ramp WN, left side, before bridge

2211 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Ramp WN, left side, after bridge

891 Good overall, several posts out

Box Beam Guide Rail

Ramp WN, right side, before bridge

1239 Good overall, impact attenuator

damaged

Box Beam Guide Rail

Ramp WN, right side, after bridge

1426 Good overall, several posts out

Exhibit 2.3.3.8-8 Lyell Ave and Lexington Ave Interchanges



Box Beam Guide Rail

Ramp DE, left side 261 Fair


Ramp DE, left side 185 Fair, end section damaged


Ramp DE, right side 324 Fair

Box Beam Guide Rail

Ramp DC, left side 272 Fair, several posts out

Box Beam Guide Rail

Ramp DA, left side 619 Good


Between ramp EA and ramp ED

1447 Fair, some posts out, corroded

Exhibit 2.3.3.8-9 Lyell Avenue




Lyell Ave (WB), between ramp DB &

Matilda St 118 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Lyell Ave (WB), adjacent to I-390

bridge 141 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Lyell Ave (EB), adjacent to I-390 bridge

152 Good

Box Beam Guide Rail

Lyell Ave (EB), at ramp DE

154 Good


Lyell Ave (EB), between ramp DD and

Erie Canal 126 Fair

Cable Guide Rail Adjacent to Erie Canal 49 Poor, corroded

Cable Guide Rail Adjacent to Erie Canal 107 Poor, corroded


UTILITY FACILITIES INVENTORY REPORT

HC 203 (6/03) UTILITY FACILITIES INVENTORY REPORT X INITIAL / FINAL (check one) P.I.N.(s): 4390.13 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NYS Route 390/I-490/NYS Route 31 Interchange Improvements Federal Aid Project Number(s): Contract “D” Number: Date Inventory to DQAB: Date Revised Inventory to DQAB: Letting Date:

REF NO

1

NAME AND DESCRIPTION OF

UTILITY SCOPE AND LOCATION OF WORK REQUIRED

PRESENT

ROW LOCATION

RELOCATION DATA

DDAD3

TO UTILITY

DA TO

UTILITY4

UTILITY WORK

AGREE. DQAB

AUTHORIZATION AND

REMARKS

Y/N

R or NR

2

COST EST.

WHEN?/BY?

March 2012 Page 1 of 23

Fiber Optic

F1

Buried fiber optic cable crosses BIN 7025830

over I-390. Owned by WilTel Communications. Extends along CSX ROW

off the project limits to the East and West STA SB 137+60 ±

CSX Rail

N

F2

Fiber optic cable crosses BIN 7025830 over

I-390. Owned by Sprint. Cable in steel conduit attached to the north side of the

bridge. STA SB 137+60 ±

CSX Rail

N

F3

Fiber Optic cable runs north –south along the west side of I‐390 SB from southern project

limits until I‐490 EB where it changes direction and runs east crossing proposed work at ES 25+25, SB 170+75, NB 656+40

and SBC 171+90

New York

State

Y

F4

Fiber Optic cable runs north-south along the

west side of I-390 SB at stations shown. SBC 169+00 to SBC 180+00 (LT)

New York State

N

F5

Fiber optic cable runs along the south side of Trolley Blvd from Lee Road off the western project limit. Owned by MCDES. Crosses

under I-390 at STA SB 229+50 ±

City of

Rochester

N


REF NO

1



PRESENT

ROW LOCATION

RELOCATION DATA

DDAD3

TO UTILITY

DA TO

UTILITY4

UTILITY WORK

AGREE. DQAB

AUTHORIZATION AND

REMARKS

Y/N

R or NR

2

COST EST.

WHEN?/BY?


Electric

E1

Highway lighting, I-390 NB, RT, SB 112+00

to STA NB 655+10

New York State

N

E2

Highway lighting, I-390 NB, RT/LT

STA NB 669+00 TO STA NB 671+75 LT, STA NB 671+75 TO NB 684+75 RT

New York State

Y

E3

Highway lighting, I-390 SB, RT, STA SB

116+40 TO SBC 158+00

New York State

Y

E4

Highway lighting, I-390 SB,

STA SB 197+00 TO STA SB 200+00 RT STA 200+00 to STA SB 201+75 LT

New York

State Y

E5

Highway lighting, I-490 EB, RT, Howard

Road to I-390 SB

New York State

N Outside project limits

E6

Highway lighting, I-490 EB, RT/LT, I-390 SB to ramp SE

New York State

N

E7

Highway lighting, I-490 EB, RT, ramp SE to

Erie Canal

New York State

N

E8

Highway lighting, I-490 WB, RT, Howard

Road to ramp SW

New York State



REF NO

1



PRESENT

ROW LOCATION

RELOCATION DATA

DDAD3

TO UTILITY

DA TO

UTILITY4

UTILITY WORK

AGREE. DQAB

AUTHORIZATION AND

REMARKS

Y/N

R or NR

2

COST EST.

WHEN?/BY?


E9

Highway lighting, I-490 WB, RT/LT, Erie

Canal to ramp SW

New York State

N

E10

Highway lighting, Ramp SE, RT

New York State

N

E11

Highway lighting, Ramp SW, LT

Entire ramp

New York State

Y

E12

Highway lighting, Ramp DD, RT

New York State

N

E13

Highway lighting, Ramp ES, RT, ramp begin

to approximate ramp midpoint STA ES 23+75 TO STA ES 38+75

New York State

Y

E14

Highway lighting, Ramp NE, LT

No proposed work/widening

New York State

N

E15

Highway lighting, Ramp WN, LT


New York State

N

E16

Highway lighting, Ramp WS, RT


New York State

N

E17

Highway lighting, Ramp EN, RT

Before STA EN 10+00 TO EN 28+00

New York State

Y

E18

Highway lighting, Ramp NW, RT

New York State



REF NO

1



PRESENT

ROW LOCATION

RELOCATION DATA

DDAD3

TO UTILITY

DA TO

UTILITY4

UTILITY WORK

AGREE. DQAB

AUTHORIZATION AND

REMARKS

Y/N

R or NR

2

COST EST.

WHEN?/BY?


E19

Highway lighting, Ramp DE, RT

Removal Required

New York State

N

E20

Highway lighting, Ramp DF, RT

New York State

N

E21

Highway lighting, Ramp DC, RT

New York State

N

E22

Highway lighting ramp DB, RT

New York State

N

E23

Highway lighting, Ramp DA, RT Removal Required

New York State

Y

E24

Highway lighting, Ramp EA, RT

New York State


E25

Highway lighting, Ramp ED, RT

New York State


E26

Highway lighting, Ramp EC, RT

New York State


E27

Highway lighting, Ramp EB, RT

New York State


E28

Highway lighting, RT/LT, I-390 NB ramp DD

to Lexington Avenue

New York State


E29

Highway lighting, RT/LT, I-390 SB ramp DC

to Lexington Avenue

New York State



REF NO

1



PRESENT

ROW LOCATION

RELOCATION DATA

DDAD3

TO UTILITY

DA TO

UTILITY4

UTILITY WORK

AGREE. DQAB

AUTHORIZATION AND

REMARKS

Y/N

R or NR

2

COST EST.

WHEN?/BY?


E30

Highway lighting, RT/LT, I-390 SB STA SBC 158+00 to SBC 187+50

New York State

Y

E31

Highway lighting, RT, Lyell Ave Rossmore

St. to Tarwood Drive

City of Rochester

Y

E32

Underground electric for

Highway lighting, RT, Lyell Ave, ramp DF to ramp DD (To be Removed)

STA LA 110+32 to STA LA 118+50

City of Rochester

Y

E33

Overhead Electric and Highway lighting, LT,

Lyell Ave, Lee Road to Erie Canal STA LA 119+25 to STA LA 132+00,LT

City of Rochester

Y

E34

Highway lighting, LT, Lexington Avenue,

ramp EB to Lee Road

City of Rochester


E35

Highway lighting and overhead electric,

crosses Lyell, between Rossmore Street and Matilda Street

STA LA 102+55

City of Rochester

Y

E36


crosses Lyell, between Rossmore Street and Matilda Street

STA LA 103+92

City of Rochester

Y

E37


crosses Lyell, at Matilda Street STA LA 105+10

City of Rochester

Y


REF NO

1



PRESENT

ROW LOCATION

RELOCATION DATA

DDAD3

TO UTILITY

DA TO

UTILITY4

UTILITY WORK

AGREE. DQAB

AUTHORIZATION AND

REMARKS

Y/N

R or NR

2

COST EST.

WHEN?/BY?


E38


crosses Lyell, at Tarwood Drive STA LA 106+22

City of Rochester

Y

E39


crosses Lyell, between Tarwood Drive and ramp DF

STA LA 107+12

City of Rochester

Y

E40

Overhead electric, crosses Lyell, between Tarwood Drive and ramp DF

STA LA 108+25

City of Rochester

Y/N

E41

Overhead electric, crosses Lyell, at Lee Road

STA LA 120+30, continues down ramp C

City of

Rochester Y

E42

Overhead electric, crosses Lyell, between

Lee Road and the Erie Canal STA LA 122+30

City of Rochester

Y

E43



City of Rochester

Y

E44



City of Rochester

Y


REF NO

1



PRESENT

ROW LOCATION

RELOCATION DATA

DDAD3

TO UTILITY

DA TO

UTILITY4

UTILITY WORK

AGREE. DQAB

AUTHORIZATION AND

REMARKS

Y/N

R or NR

2

COST EST.

WHEN?/BY?


E45



City of Rochester

Y

E46



City of Rochester

Y

E47

Overhead electric, crosses Lyell, east of the

Erie Canal STA LA 133+90

City of Rochester


E48

Underground Electric, Lyell Avenue (north side) crosses ramp DA and continues west

over Lyell Avenue bridge over I-390 , crossing ramp DC and DB ending at Eugene

Street STA LA 109+30 ± to STA LA 117+50, LT

New York State/City

of Rochester

Y

E49

Underground electric, Howard Road (west

side) begins south of I-490 crosses Howard Road bridge and ends north of I-490

New York State/City

of Rochester

N

Outside project limits

E50

Underground electric, Buffalo road (south side) crosses I-390 at Buffalo road bridge

STA SBC 148+50 STA BR 14+50 to STA BR 17+25 (RT)

New York State/City

of Rochester

Y

Electric on bridge to be replaced


REF NO

1



PRESENT

ROW LOCATION

RELOCATION DATA

DDAD3

TO UTILITY

DA TO

UTILITY4

UTILITY WORK

AGREE. DQAB

AUTHORIZATION AND

REMARKS

Y/N

R or NR

2

COST EST.

WHEN?/BY?


E51

Underground electric, runs north from

Dearcop Drive under ramp SE where it turns to run east parallel to ramp SE, crosses to

the south side of SE near the converge point and travels east on the south side of ramp

SE to the end of ramp SE

New York State

Y

E52

Overhead Electric and underground electric,

crosses I-390 at Trolley Blvd (north side) STA SB 230+00

New York

State

Y/N

Overhead electric will not be impacted

E53

Overhead electric and lighting runs along the

north side of Lyell Ave LA 94+00 to LA 103+90 (LT)

City of Rochester

Y

E54

Overhead electric and lighting crosses Lyell

Ave LA 95+30

City of Rochester

Y

E55

Overhead electric crosses Lyell Ave

LA 97+75

City of Rochester

Y

E56


left side of Lyell Ave LA 105+10 to 106+10 (LT)

City of Rochester

Y

E57

Overhead electric runs along the left side of

Lyell Ave LA 106+10 to 109+30 (LT)

City of Rochester

N


REF NO

1



PRESENT

ROW LOCATION

RELOCATION DATA

DDAD3

TO UTILITY

DA TO

UTILITY4

UTILITY WORK

AGREE. DQAB

AUTHORIZATION AND

REMARKS

Y/N

R or NR

2

COST EST.

WHEN?/BY?


E58


left side of Lyell Ave LA 117+50 to LA 119+25 (LT)

City of Rochester

N

E59

Underground electric for ramps LA 118+50 to LA 120+40 (RT)

City of Rochester

N

E60


right side of Lyell Ave LA 120+40 to LA 132+00 (RT)

City of Rochester

Y

E61

Overhead electric crossing both I‐390 NB and SB (High Tension Power Lines)

SB 122+00

New York State

N

E62

Overhead electric crosses I‐390 NB & SB at CSX Transportation Crossing

SB 137+00

New York State

N

E63

Electric & highway lighting crosses I‐390 SB before Ramp WS and runs along Ramp ES

crossing 390 Southbound Through Traffic at SB 170+50 and 390 NB at NB 656+75 before heading

east along I‐490 off project limits

SBC 162+75

New York State

Y/N

E64

Highway lighting for I‐490 EB crosses

Southbound Through Traffic at SB 170+50 and I‐390 NB at NB

656+00 before heading east along I‐490 off project limits

New York State

N


REF NO

1



PRESENT

ROW LOCATION

RELOCATION DATA

DDAD3

TO UTILITY

DA TO

UTILITY4

UTILITY WORK

AGREE. DQAB

AUTHORIZATION AND

REMARKS

Y/N

R or NR

2

COST EST.

WHEN?/BY?


E65

Highway lighting on RT & LT side

NB 647+00 to NB 721+00

New York State

Y

E66

Highway lighting on LT side SB 200+00 to SB 236+50

New York State

Y/N

E67

Overhead electric

LR 10+50 to LR 14+40 L

City of Rochester

Y

Cable Television

C1

CATV cable, underground, crosses I-490 at

Howard Road and continues to the north and south off the project limit

New York State/City

of Rochester

N


C2

Cable crosses Lyell Avenue overhead at

Matilda Street (see E37) LA 105+10

City of Rochester

Y

C3

Cable crosses Lyell Avenue overhead at Lee

Road (see E41) LA 120+30

City of Rochester

Y

C4

Crosses beneath I‐390 NB & SB on the north side of Buffalo Road

SBC 150+00

New York State/City

of Rochester

N


REF NO

1



PRESENT

ROW LOCATION

RELOCATION DATA

DDAD3

TO UTILITY

DA TO

UTILITY4

UTILITY WORK

AGREE. DQAB

AUTHORIZATION AND

REMARKS

Y/N

R or NR

2

COST EST.

WHEN?/BY?


C5

Cable crosses NYS 390 at Trolley Blvd underground. North of Trolley Blvd.

SB 230+00

New York State/City

of Rochester

Y

C6

Cable crosses NYS 390 at Trolley Blvd

overhead. North of Trolley Blvd. SB 230+00

New York State/City

of Rochester

Y

C7

Cable runs along the north side of Lyell

Avenue overhead from Howard Road to Erie Canal

LA 93+75 to LA 132+00

City of Rochester

Y

C8

Overhead cable runs along the west side of Lee Road.

LR 10+50 TO LR 14+40

City of Rochester

Y

Gas Mains

G1

20” steel gas main in 24” casing, crosses I-390 at the Buffalo Road Bridge (north side), continues east and west off of project limits

SBC 148+50

New York State/City

of Rochester

N

Assume adequate depth

G2

Gas main of unknown diameter and length located SE of the I-490 EB bridge over the

Erie Canal

Griffith Energy

N



REF NO

1



PRESENT

ROW LOCATION

RELOCATION DATA

DDAD3

TO UTILITY

DA TO

UTILITY4

UTILITY WORK

AGREE. DQAB

AUTHORIZATION AND

REMARKS

Y/N

R or NR

2

COST EST.

WHEN?/BY?


G3

8” & 12” gas main crosses NYS 390 at Lyell Avenue (north side), continues along Lyell avenue to the east and west at 8” diameter

until it leaves the project limits SBC 205+00 (crossing),

LA 93+25 TO LA 132+00 north side

New York State/City

of Rochester

Y

G4

2” PE gas main crosses NYS 390 in 3” steel casing at Trolley Blvd and continues to the

east and west off the project limits SB 230+00

New York State/City

of Rochester

Y

G5

8” gas main, crosses I-490 at Howard Road and continues north and south off the project

limits

New York State/City

of Rochester

N


G6

Two (2) 24” WR Steel gas mains in 30” casing. Cross I-390 NB & SB

SB 122+00

New York State

N

G7

Gas main crosses Lyell Ave and connects to

G3 and 93+25 to 96+25 City of

Rochester Y

G8

3” Gas main leaves G3 and travels north up

the middle of Cornelia Drive LA 99+10

City of Rochester

Y

G9

2” Gas main leaves G3 and travels north up

the east side of Cornelia Drive LA 99+40

City of Rochester

Y


REF NO

1



PRESENT

ROW LOCATION

RELOCATION DATA

DDAD3

TO UTILITY

DA TO

UTILITY4

UTILITY WORK

AGREE. DQAB

AUTHORIZATION AND

REMARKS

Y/N

R or NR

2

COST EST.

WHEN?/BY?


G10

Gas main leaves G3 and travels up the east

side of Rossmore Drive LA 101+00

City of Rochester

Y

G11

Gas service into East Gates Professional

Building LA 102+80

City of Rochester

Y

G12

Gas main that leaves G3 and travels north

up Matilda Street and south into East Gates professional building

LA 104+60

City of Rochester

Y

G13

Gas main leaves G3 and travels up the east side of Lee Road

LA 120+90 & LR 10+40 to LR 12+00 RT

City of Rochester

Y

G14

Gas main leaves G3 and travels south from

Lyell Ave and continues down proposed Ramp C

LA 121+40

New York State/City

of Rochester

Y

G15

Gas main leaves G3 and travels south from

Lyell Ave and continues off project limits LA 123+60

City of Rochester

Y

G16

Gas main leaves G3 and travels south from Lyell Ave and continues off project limits

LA 127+60

City of Rochester

Y


REF NO

1



PRESENT

ROW LOCATION

RELOCATION DATA

DDAD3

TO UTILITY

DA TO

UTILITY4

UTILITY WORK

AGREE. DQAB

AUTHORIZATION AND

REMARKS

Y/N

R or NR

2

COST EST.

WHEN?/BY?


G17

2” Gas main travels along the south side of

Lyell STA LA 104+25 to LA 106+40 then heads south along the east side of

Tarwood Drive

City of Rochester

Y

G18

2” Gas main leaves G3 at STA LA 108+25

and heads north up the west side of Eugene street

City of Rochester

Y

G19

2” Gas main leaves G3 at STA LA 116+40 and runs north under existing ramp DA and

continues north along the west side of Evelyn Street

City of Rochester

Y

G20

Two (2) 10” Gas lines in 30” casing run

under I-490 EB and I-490 WB along the west side of the Erie Canal

Buckeye Pipeline

New York State

N

Assume adequate depth

G21

2” Gas main leaves G3 and travels north up the east side of Fox Run. STA LA 93+10.

City of Rochester

Y

Water Mains

W1

42” Water main located on Lee Road from the Lexington Avenue intersection to the

project limit

City of Rochester

N



REF NO

1



PRESENT

ROW LOCATION

RELOCATION DATA

DDAD3

TO UTILITY

DA TO

UTILITY4

UTILITY WORK

AGREE. DQAB

AUTHORIZATION AND

REMARKS

Y/N

R or NR

2

COST EST.

WHEN?/BY?


W2

10” Water main and services located on Lee Road from the Lexington Avenue intersection

to the project limit

City of Rochester

N


W3

12” Water main and services located on Lee Road from the Lexington Avenue intersection

to the project limit

City of Rochester

N


W4

12” Water main located on Lexington Ave

from the Lee Road intersection to the project limit

City of Rochester

N


W5

12” Ductile iron water main, crosses I-390

NB & SB north of the Buffalo road overpass, encased, continues east and west as 8” off

project limit Crosses I-390 at SBC 150+00

New York State/City

of Rochester

Y

W6

36” PCCP runs across I-490 EB & WB on the eastern side of the Erie Canal, continues to

the north and south off the project limit

City of Rochester

N


W7

6” Ductile Iron water main, crosses I-490 EB & WB at Howard road and continues to the north and south along Howard Road off the

project limit

New York State/City

of Rochester

N



REF NO

1



PRESENT

ROW LOCATION

RELOCATION DATA

DDAD3

TO UTILITY

DA TO

UTILITY4

UTILITY WORK

AGREE. DQAB

AUTHORIZATION AND

REMARKS

Y/N

R or NR

2

COST EST.

WHEN?/BY?


W8

8” & 12” ductile iron water main, cross NYS 390 north of Lyell Avenue, continues along Lyell Avenue at 8” until it leaves the project

limits LA 93+25 to LA 132+00

Crosses I-390 at SBC 205+10

New York State/City

of Rochester

Y

W9

6” AC water main, crosses NYS 390 between Lyell Avenue and Trolley Blvd. and continues

east and west Crosses I-390 at SBC 215+60

New York State/City

of Rochester

N

Reimbursable – depends on depth

W10

8” Ductile iron water main in 30” casing crosses NYS 390 north of Trolley Blvd,

continues east and west off the project limit Crosses I-390 at SB 230+10

New York State/City

of Rochester

Y

Reimbursable – depends on depth

W11

6” AC water main cross NYS 390 from

Evelyn Street to Albert Street and continues east and west off the project limits

STA SB 226+00

New York State/City

of Rochester

N

W12

16” & 8” Ductile iron water main runs along the south side of Lyell Avenue, crosses to

the north side and meets W8 LA 98+25 to LA 107+50

Crosses Lyell at LA 107+50

City of Rochester

Y


REF NO

1



PRESENT

ROW LOCATION

RELOCATION DATA

DDAD3

TO UTILITY

DA TO

UTILITY4

UTILITY WORK

AGREE. DQAB

AUTHORIZATION AND

REMARKS

Y/N

R or NR

2

COST EST.

WHEN?/BY?


W13

16” Ductile iron water main, runs along the

south side of Lyell Avenue from Erie Canal to W8, crossing to the north side before it

reaches its western terminus LA 119+37 to LA 132+00

City of Rochester

Y

W14

8" Cast Iron Water main, crosses I-390 NB &

SB SB 120+50

New York State

N

W15

12" Cast Iron Water main, crosses I‐390 NB & SB

SB 122+75

New York State

N

W16

36" STL water main, crosses I‐390 NB & SB STA SB 127+40

New York State

N

W17

8" Diameter water main off of W8 that runs north

LA 97+00 (LT)

City of Rochester

N

W18

Water main off of W8 that runs north down

Cornelia Drive LA 99+10 (LT)

City of Rochester

Y

W19

6" Diameter water main off of W8 that runs

north down Rossmore Street LA 101+08 (LT)

City of Rochester

Y


REF NO

1



PRESENT

ROW LOCATION

RELOCATION DATA

DDAD3

TO UTILITY

DA TO

UTILITY4

UTILITY WORK

AGREE. DQAB

AUTHORIZATION AND

REMARKS

Y/N

R or NR

2

COST EST.

WHEN?/BY?


W20

6" Ductile Iron water main off of W8 that runs

north down Matilda Street STA 104+93 (LT)

City of Rochester

Y

W21

Water main that runs along the south side of

Lyell STA 101+00 to LA 105+95 (RT)

City of Rochester

Y

W22

6" Cast iron water main that partially crosses

Lyell Ave and heads down Tarwood Dr. LA 106+00

City of Rochester

Y

W23

Water main that runs down Lee Road and proposed Ramp A, crosses Lyell Ave at LA

120+50

City of Rochester

Y

W24

8” Ductile iron water service, leaves W21 at STA LA 101+05 and heads south

City of Rochester

Y

W25

6” Water service leaves W21 at STA LA 103+55 and runs south along unnamed road

City of Rochester

Y

Sanitary Sewer Mains

S1

22’ SDR/26” HDPE south of and parallel to I-

490 EB, Howard road to west of ramp WS and south off the project limit

New York State/City

of Rochester

N



REF NO

1



PRESENT

ROW LOCATION

RELOCATION DATA

DDAD3

TO UTILITY

DA TO

UTILITY4

UTILITY WORK

AGREE. DQAB

AUTHORIZATION AND

REMARKS

Y/N

R or NR

2

COST EST.

WHEN?/BY?


S2

8” ACP, Kencrest Drive to pump station at Tarwood Drive Intersection

City of Rochester

N

S3

18” pipe (force main), unknown type begins at the Kencrest-Tarwood intersection and

crosses I-490 EB & WB as well as ramp WN and continues south off the project limit

New York State/City

of Rochester

N

S4

8”/10” ACP, crosses Lyell Avenue at STA

126+80 and runs south crossing ramp EN, I-490 WB, ramp ES, I-490 EB and ramp SE

ending at the Dearcop pump station

New York State/City

of Rochester

Y/N

Portion beneath Lyell Avenue may

require relocation. Remainder outside project limits.

S5

18” Tile and PVC pipe begins at Rossmore

St and runs to manhole at north end of Tarwood Drive, meets S14

STA LA 101+25 to LA 106+25

City of Rochester

N

S6

10” pipe, unknown type begins at Wegmans

drive and runs to manhole at north end of Tarwood Drive

STA LA 102+25 to LA 106+25 (RT)

City of Rochester

N

S7

10” pipe of unknown type, North side of Lyell

Avenue, begins between Lee Road and Erie Canal and runs to the north end of

S4 from the east and west LA 124+20 to LA 129+75 (LT)

City of Rochester

N


REF NO

1



PRESENT

ROW LOCATION

RELOCATION DATA

DDAD3

TO UTILITY

DA TO

UTILITY4

UTILITY WORK

AGREE. DQAB

AUTHORIZATION AND

REMARKS

Y/N

R or NR

2

COST EST.

WHEN?/BY?


S8

8” pipe of unknown type, North side of Lyell Avenue, begins at ramp DA and runs north

on Lee road off the project limits LA 117+50 to LA 120+75 (LT) LR 10+40 to LR 17+10 (RT)

City of Rochester

N

S9

8” ACP , Evelyn Street, begins at the south

end and runs to the north end where it meets S11

City of Rochester

N

Sufficient depth, relocation not anticipated

S10

12” ACP,crosses I-390 NB & SB from Evelyn Street to Albert Street and runs west off the

project limit

New York State/City

of Rochester

N

S11

8” pipe of unknown type, Beechwood Drive, runs from south end to north end where it

meets S11

City of Rochester

N


S12

8” pipe of unknown type, begins at the south end of Matilda and runs north where it meets

S11

City of Rochester

N

S13

8” ACP, begins at the south end of

Rossmore St. and runs north where it meets S11

LA 101+25 (LT)

City of Rochester

N

S14

8” pipe of unknown type begins at the

intersection of Dearcop Drive and Buffalo Road and runs west for approximately 180’

City of Rochester

N

May require relocation based on bridge excavation


REF NO

1



PRESENT

ROW LOCATION

RELOCATION DATA

DDAD3

TO UTILITY

DA TO

UTILITY4

UTILITY WORK

AGREE. DQAB

AUTHORIZATION AND

REMARKS

Y/N

R or NR

2

COST EST.

WHEN?/BY?


S15

12” CIP pipe (force main) begins south of Buffalo Road and crosses Buffalo Road

between Crestwood Blvd and Dearcop Drive where it continues to the north to an

unknown terminus

City of Rochester

N


S16

6” CIP, begins at an unknown southern terminus and runs to the Dearcop pump

station

City of Rochester

N


S17

15” Clay sanitary sewer, begins south of the

rail line adjacent to Trolley Blvd. and runs North under Trolley Blvd to a manhole where

the line ends

City of Rochester

N


S18

8” pipe of unknown type begins at the

southern end of Lee Road Extension and runs north to Lyell avenue where it turns east

and intersects S4 STA LA 121+00 to LA 126+70

City of Rochester

N

S19

12” PVC pipe begins at structure north side of Lyell Ave and runs west off the project limits. Structure located at STA 93+50. Structure has 3 12” PVC inlets with unknown origins.

City of Rochester

N


REF NO

1



PRESENT

ROW LOCATION

RELOCATION DATA

DDAD3

TO UTILITY

DA TO

UTILITY4

UTILITY WORK

AGREE. DQAB

AUTHORIZATION AND

REMARKS

Y/N

R or NR

2

COST EST.

WHEN?/BY?


Telephone

T1

Underground telephone travels along the south side of Lyell Avenue from Howard

Road to the Erie Canal. STA LA 95+00 to LA 132+00

City of Rochester

Y

T2

Underground telephone runs north from Lyell Avenue main line. STA LA 97+25.

City of Rochester

Y

T3

Underground telephone runs north-south and crosses Lyell Avenue at STA LA 108+25.

City of Rochester

Y

T4

Underground telephone runs north from Lyell Avenue along the center of Lee Road.

STA LA 120+50

City of Rochester

Y

T5

Underground telephone runs north from Lyell Avenue along the center of Lee Road.

STA LA 120+75

City of Rochester

Y

T6

Underground telephone runs east-west along

the north side of Trolly Blvd crossing NYS 390 NB & SB.

City of Rochester

Y


REF NO

1



PRESENT

ROW LOCATION

RELOCATION DATA

DDAD3

TO UTILITY

DA TO

UTILITY4

UTILITY WORK

AGREE. DQAB

AUTHORIZATION AND

REMARKS

Y/N

R or NR

2

COST EST.

WHEN?/BY?


T7

Two (2) underground telephone lines cross I-390 NB & SB via the CSX rail bridge. STA

SB 137+50.

CSX Rail N

1. 1A, 2A, etc., should be used for reimbursable relocations, and 1B, 2B, etc., should be used for non-reimbursable relocations or betterments. 2. R – Reimbursable, NR – Non-reimbursable 3. DDAD – Draft Design Approval Document 4. DA – Design Approval Memo 5. Highlighted cells refer to Contract 2, which will require updating with further detailed design.


CRITICAL DESIGN ELEMENTS FOREXISTING RAMPS

NYS 390 / I-490 / NYS 31 Interchange ImprovementsSeptember 2012 Draft Design Report / Environmental Assessment PIN 4390.13

1

Exhibit 2.3.3.2.(1)-1Critical Design Elements for Direct Connection Ramps (Existing Conditions)

(I-490 / I-390 / NY 390 Interchange)PIN: 4390.13 NHS (Y/N): Connects NHS Highways

Route No. & Name: SW (I-390 NB to I-490 WB)WN (I-490 EB to NY 390 NB)NE (NY 390 SB to I-490 EB)ES (I-490 WB to I-390 SB)SE (I-390 NB to I-490 EB)

NW (NY 390 SB to I-490 WB)WS (I-490 EB to I-390 SB)

EN (I-490 WB to NY 390NB)

Functional Classification: UrbanPrincipal Arterial Expressway (NY 390)Principal Arterial Interstate (I-490/I-390)

Project Type: Reconstruction Design Classification: Ramp% Trucks (Max.): 7.9% (SW) / 6.2% (WN)

2.5% (NE) / 5.7% (ES)13.7% (SE) / 6.4% (NW)3.4% (WS) / 8.3% (EN)

Terrain: Level

AADT (2035): 14,900 (SW) / 11,500 (WN)20,900 (NE) / 8,000 (ES)7,100 (SE) / 11,500 (NW)14,800 (WS) / 24,000 (EN)

Truck Access/Qualifying Hwy. Yes / Connects Qualifying Highways

Element StandardExisting Condition

(all ramps within original projectstudy area)

1 Design Speed

45 mph1 (SW/NE/WN/SE/NW)50 mph1 (WS/ES/EN)

40 mph (Minimum) / 50 mph (Preferred)HDM Section 2.7.5.2 A

30 mphHDM Section 7.6.3, Exhibit 7-11

“Standards of the Day”

Posted35 mph (SW)

40 mph (NE/WN/SE)45 mph (NW)

50 mph (ES/WS/EN)

2 Lane Width2

(Existing)

16 ft. minimum (WS)17 ft. minimum (SW/SE/WN/NW)

(Case II Condition D. Includes deduction for combinedshoulder width. Deduction for shoulder width < Case I

width. Use Case I width.)HDM Section 2.7.5.2B, Exhibit 2-9

27 ft. minimum both lanes combined (NE)25 ft. minimum both lanes combined (ES/EN)

(Case III Condition D1)(Includes 2 ft. deduction for shoulder width)

HDM Section 2.7.5.2 B, Exhibit 2-9

12 ft. per lane (NE/ES/EN)*

14 ft. (SW/SE/NW/WS)*

14 to 15 ft. (WN)*

3 Shoulder Width(Minimum)

Curbed - 0 ft. (left/right)Curbed – 2 ft. Desirable (left/right)

Uncurbed - 3 ft. (left) / 6 ft. (right) (40 mph) / 8 ft. (right)(45-50 mph)

HDM Section 2.7.5.2 C, Exhibit 2-10

3 ft. (right) (WN)*

3 ft. (left)8 ft. (right)

(all other ramps)

4 Bridge Roadway Width Full Approach Roadway WidthHDM Section 2.7.5.2 D

All 3 bridges are narrower than theapproach roadway width*

5 Maximum Grade7% (30 mph)4

6% (40 mph)4

5% (45-50 mph)4

HDM Section 2.7.5.2 E, Exhibit 2-10

3.80% (NE/EN)1.30% (ES)3.50% (SW)2.20% (WN)

3.0% (SE/WS)2.0% (NW)


2


(I-490 / I-390 / NY 390 Interchange)

6 Horizontal Curvature(Minimum)

485 ft. (@ e = 6.0%) (40 mph)4

643 ft. (@ e = 6.0%) (45 mph)833 ft. (@ e = 6.0%) (50 mph)

HDM Section 2.7.5.2 F, Exhibit 2-10230 ft. (@ e = 6.0%) (30 mph)485 ft. (@ e = 6.0%) (40 mph)4

894 ft. (@ e = 6.0%) (45 mph)1104 ft. (@ e = 6.0%) (50 mph)HDM Section 7.6.3, Exhibit 7-11


674 ft. (SW)676 ft. (NE)

716 ft. (WN/SE/NW)955 ft. (WS)1273 ft. (ES)1432 ft. (EN)

7 Superelevation Rate(Maximum)

6% (Urban)HDM Section 2.7.5.2 G

6% (SW/WN)

> 6%*(all other ramps)

8 Stopping Sight Distance(Minimum)

305 ft. (40 mph)360 ft. (45 mph)425 ft. (50 mph)

HDM Section 2.7.5.2 H, Exhibit 2-10200 ft. (30 mph)275 ft. (40 mph)

unlisted (45 mph)350 ft. (50 mph)

HDM Section 7.6.3, Exhibit 7-11“Standards of the Day”

228 ft. (Ramp SW)259 ft. (NE)

250 ft. (Ramp WN)329 ft. (SE)348 ft. (ES)

407 ft. (Ramp EN)390 ft. (WS)

>425 ft. (NW)

9 Horizontal Clearance(from EOT)

3 ft. Minimum (left side)Greater of shoulder width or 6 ft. Minimum (right side)

(Additional 4 ft. clearance beyond the outside ofshoulders to bridge piers or abutments)

HDM Section 2.7.5.2 I


10 Vertical Clearance(Minimum)

14 ft. (Bridge)3

14.5 ft. Desirable (Bridge)15 ft. (Overhead Sign Structures)

15.5 ft. Desirable (Overhead Sign Structures)HDM Section 2.7.5.2 J & BM Section 2.4

14 ft. Min (Bridge)

11 Travel Lane Cross Slope 1.5% Min. to 2% Max.HDM Section 2.7.5.2 K superelevated

12 Rollover4% between lanes; 8% at EOT;

(If shoulder drainage is a concern, and superelevation >6%, may use 10% for outer 1.2 m of shoulder).

HDM Section 2.7.5.2 L & 3.2.5.18%

13 Structural Capacity

AASHTO HL-93 Live Load and the NYSDOT DesignPermit Vehicle (new and replacement bridges)

HDM Section 2.7.5.2.M & BM Section 2.6.1

HS 20 Minimum (bridge rehabilitation)HDM Section 2.7.5.2 M & BM Section 2.6.2

> HS 20

14 Level of Service Min. “C” – Urban (interstate ramp junctions only)HDM Section 2.7.5.2 N Section 2.3.1.7*

15 Control of Access Fully controlledHDM Section 2.7.5.2 O Fully Controlled

16

PedestrianAccommodation(For ped facilities locatedat the ramp terminal)

5 ft. Minimum4 ft. Minimum (Restricted Areas)

In accordance with HDM Chapter 18HDM Section 2.7.5.2 P & 18.6.5.1

Prohibited

17 Median Width NA NA


3


(I-490 / I-390 / NY 390 Interchange)(1) The use of a Design Speed of 45 to 50 mph was selected based on the ramp type and the sharpest ramp curve for each ramp.A ramp speed study is not required to determine the ramp design speed. The ramp design speed for the design criteria applies tothe sharpest ramp curve, usually on the ramp proper. The ramp design speed does not apply to the ramp terminals, whichgenerally includes transition curves and speed change lanes. Desirably, ramp design speed should approximate the anticipatedoff-peak 50th percentile speed on the higher speed intersecting highway (mainline) within the range of functional class speeds forthe terrain and volume. (Refer to Section 2.3.1.5 Speeds and Delays and Appendix C of this report for additional information onspeed data).(2) Standard lane width shown is based on the sharpest ramp curve for each ramp.(3) Since the Thruway (I-90) is the designated 16 ft. clearance route through the Rochester urban area, the minimum verticalclearance is 14 ft. as per NYSDOT Engineering Structures Management.(4) Criteria listed is the same as the “Standards of the Day” shown in the HDM Exhibit 7-11.* Non-standard feature


4

Exhibit 2.3.3.2.(1)-2Critical Design Elements for Loop Ramps (Existing Conditions)

(NY 390 / NY 31 Interchange)(NY 390 / Lexington Avenue Interchange)

PIN: 4390.13 NHS (Y/N): Connects to an NHS HighwayRoute No. & Name: DC (NY 31 WB to NY 390 SB)

DE (NY 31 EB to NY 390 NB)EC (NY 390 SB to Lexington

Ave.)

Functional Classification: UrbanMinor Arterial (NY 31/Lexington Ave.)

Principal Arterial Expressway (NY 390)

Project Type: Reconstruction Design Classification: Ramp% Trucks (Max.): 18.5% (DC)

10.4% (DE)15.3% (EC)

Terrain: Level

AADT (2035): 3,700 (DC)2,200 (DE) / 1,700 (EC)

Truck Access/Qualifying Hwy. Connects Qualifying toAccess Highway



1 Design Speed 25 mph (Minimum)3

HDM Section 2.7.5.2 A

Posted25 mph (DE)

30 mph (DC/EC)

2 Lane Width1

(Existing)

25 ft. minimum (DE)28 ft. minimum (DC)34 ft. minimum (EC)

(Case II Condition D. Includes deduction for combinedshoulder width. Deduction for shoulder width > Case I

width. Use Case II width.)HDM Section 2.7.5.2 B, Exhibit 2-9

15 ft. (DC/DE/EC)*


Curbed - 0 ft. (left/right)Curbed – 2 ft. Desirable (left/right)Uncurbed - 3 ft. (left) / 6 ft. (right)


Curbed0 ft. (left/right) (EC)

Uncurbed4 ft. (left) (DC/DE)5 ft. (right) (DC)*6 ft. (right) (DE)

4 Bridge Roadway Width Full Approach Roadway WidthHDM Section 2.7.5.2 D NA

5 Maximum Grade 7%4


4.2% (DC)3.62% (DE)2.3% (EC)


144 ft. (@ e = 6.0%)4

HDM Section 2.7.5.2 F, Exhibit 2-10150 ft. (DC/DE)

230 ft. (EC)


6% (Urban)HDM Section 2.7.5.2 G > 6%*


155 ft.HDM Section 2.7.5.2 H, Exhibit 2-10

160 ft.HDM Section 7.6.3, Exhibit 7-11


200 ft. (DC/EC)141 ft. (DE)*





2 ft. min. (left) (EC)*

> 3 ft. (left)> 6 ft. (right)

(all other ramps)


14 ft. (Bridge)2

14.5 ft. Desirable (Bridge)HDM Section 2.7.5.2 J & BM Section 2.4

NA

11 Travel Lane Cross Slope 1.5% Min. to 2% Max.HDM Section 2.7.5.2 K superelevated


5

Exhibit 2.3.3.2.(1)-2Critical Design Elements for Loop Ramps (Existing Conditions)

(NY 390 / NY 31 Interchange)(NY 390 / Lexington Avenue Interchange)



HDM Section 2.7.5.2 L & 3.2.5.18%





NA

14 Level of Service NA NA

15 Control of AccessFully controlled

HDM Section 2.7.5.2 OFully Controlled

(Except EC)*

16




Existing sidewalks at ramp terminals arescarce and do not comply with standard

criteria*

17 Median Width NA NA(1) Standard lane width shown is based on the sharpest ramp curve for each ramp.(2) Since the Thruway (I-90) is the designated 16 ft. clearance route through the Rochester urban area, the minimum verticalclearance is 14 ft. as per NYSDOT Engineering Structures Management.(3) For loop ramps, a 25 mph design speed may be used as noted in the HDM Exhibit 7-11, Note 7.(4) Criteria listed is the same as the “Standards of the Day” shown in the HDM Exhibit 7-11.* Non-standard feature


6

Exhibit 2.3.3.2.(1)-3Critical Design Elements for Diagonal / Outer Connection / Semidirect Ramps

(Existing Conditions)(NY 390 / NY 31 Interchange)

(NY 390 / Lexington Avenue Interchange)PIN: 4390.13 NHS (Y/N): Connects to an NHS Highway

Route No. & Name: DA (NY 31 WB to NY 390 NB)DB (NY 390SB to NY 31)DD (NY 390 NB to NY 31)

DF (NY 31 EB to NY 390 SB)EA (NY 390 NB to Lexington)EB (Lexington to NY 390 NB)ED (Lexington to NY 390 SB)

Functional Classification: UrbanPrincipal Arterial Expressway (NY 390)Minor Arterial (NY 31 & Lexington Ave.)

Project Type: Reconstruction Design Classification: Ramp% Trucks (Max.): 28.1% (DA)

3.1% (DB)9.5% (DD)2.3% (DF)6.7% (EA)24.2% (EB)16.1% (ED)

Terrain: Level

AADT (2035): 1,100 (DA) / 4,100 (DB)11,400 (DD) / 7,400 (DF)7,600 (EA) / 1,900 (EB)

7,600 (ED)

Truck Access/Qualifying Hwy. Connects Qualifying toAccess Highway



1 Design Speed 30 mph (Minimum)4

HDM Section 2.7.5.2 A

Posted35 mph (DB)

30 mph (DD/DF/ED)Unposted (DA/EA/EB)

2 Lane Width1

(Existing)

15 ft. minimum (DA/EA/EB)18 ft. minimum (DF)

(Case II Condition D. Includes deduction for combinedstandard shoulder width < Case I width. Use Case I

width.)20 ft. minimum (DB)22 ft. minimum (ED)

(Case II Condition D. Includes deduction for combinedshoulder width. Deduction for shoulder width Case I

width. Use Case II width.)14.5 ft. minimum (DD)(Case III Condition D1)

(Includes 2 ft. deduction for shoulder width)HDM Section 2.7.5.2 B, Exhibit 2-9

12 ft. (DD)*13 to 14 ft. (DA/DF)*14 ft. (DB/EA/ED)*

16 ft. (EB)


Curbed - 0 ft. (left/right)Curbed – 2 ft. Desirable (left/right)Uncurbed - 3 ft. (left) / 6 ft. (right)


Curbed0 ft. (left) (ED)

Uncurbed3 ft. (left) (ED)


(all other ramps)

4 Bridge Roadway Width Full Approach Roadway WidthHDM Section 2.7.5.2 D NA


7

Exhibit 2.3.3.2.(1)-3Critical Design Elements for Diagonal / Outer Connection / Semidirect Ramps

(Existing Conditions)(NY 390 / NY 31 Interchange)

(NY 390 / Lexington Avenue Interchange)

5 Maximum Grade7% (30 mph)4

5% (45-50 mph)3


2.0% (DA/DD)3.6% (DB)3.8% (DF)3.2% (EA)3.5% (EB)

1.08% (ED)


231 ft. (@ e = 6.0%) (30 mph)643 ft. (@ e = 6.0%) (45 mph)3

HDM Section 2.7.5.2 F, Exhibit 2-10230 ft. (@ e = 6.0%)

HDM Section 7.6.3, Exhibit 7-11“Standards of the Day”

1910 ft. (DA)278 ft. (DB)260 ft. (DD)430 ft. (DF)

2865 ft. (EA/EB)290 ft. (ED)


6% (Urban)HDM Section 2.7.5.2 G

6% (DA/DB/EA/EB)> 6% (DD/DF/ED)*


200 ft. (30 mph)4

360 ft. (45 mph)3

HDM Section 2.7.5.2 H, Exhibit 2-10

156 ft. (ED)*195 ft. (EA)*

200 ft. (all other ramps)





2 ft. min. (left) (ED)*


(all other ramps)


14 ft. (Bridge)2

14.5 ft. Desirable (Bridge)HDM Section 2.7.5.2 J & BM Section 2.4

NA

11 Travel Lane Cross Slope 1.5% Min. to 2% Max.HDM Section 2.7.5.2 K 1.5% Min. to 2% Max.



HDM Section 2.7.5.2 L & 3.2.5.18%





NA

14 Level of Service NA NA

15 Control of AccessFully controlled

HDM Section 2.7.5.2 OFully Controlled

(Except DF/DD/ED)*

16




Existing sidewalks at ramp terminals arescarce and do not comply with standard

criteria*

17 Median Width NA NA(1) Standard lane width shown is based on the sharpest ramp curve for each ramp.(2) Since the Thruway (I-90) is the designated 16 ft. clearance route through the Rochester urban area, the minimum verticalclearance is 14 ft. as per NYSDOT Engineering Structures Management.(3) Criteria utilized for proposed ramps only.(4) Criteria listed is the same as the “Standards of the Day” shown in the HDM Exhibit 7-11.* Non-standard feature

draft design report / environmental assessment · draft design report / environmental assessment...

Documents