dr. manuel decker (phome) photonic crystals and...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Photonic Crystals and Metamaterials
Martin Wegener
WavePro Symposium, Rethymnon (Greece), June 8-11, 2011
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany- DFG-Center for Functional Nanostructures (CFN), KIT- Institut für Angewandte Physik (AP), KIT- Institut für Nanotechnologie (INT), KIT- Karlsruhe School of Optics & Photonics (KSOP), KIT
Dr. Manuel Decker (PHOME)Tolga Ergin (AP)Joachim Fischer (CFN)Dr. Isabelle Staude (CFN)Dr. Nicolas Stenger (KSOP)
Prof. Dr. Kurt Busch (KIT, Karlsruhe, Germany)Prof. Dr. Stefan Linden (Universität Bonn, Germany)Prof. Dr. John B. Pendry (Imperial College, London, U.K.)Prof. Dr. Costas M. Soukoulis (Heraklion, Greece)
Martin Wegener
Martin Wegener
- Split-Ring Resonators (SRR)- Getting Started in 2004- Remaining Puzzles in 2011
- Woodpiles and Beyond- Particle Accelerators on a Chip- 3D Visible Invisibility - Wave Cloak or Ray Cloak?
- Conclusions
Martin Wegener
- Split-Ring Resonators (SRR)- Getting Started in 2004- Remaining Puzzles in 2011
- Woodpiles and Beyond- Particle Accelerators on a Chip- 3D Visible Invisibility - Wave Cloak or Ray Cloak?
- Conclusions
Martin Wegener
- Split-Ring Resonators (SRR)- Getting Started in 2004- Remaining Puzzles in 2011
- Woodpiles and Beyond- Particle Accelerators on a Chip- 3D Visible Invisibility - Wave Cloak or Ray Cloak?
- Conclusions
The split-ring resonator …
J.B. Pendry et al., IEEE Trans. MTT 47, 2075 (1999)
2
S. Linden et al., Science 306, 1351 (2004) Martin Wegener
Theory of waves in metamaterialsL. Solymar, E. Shamonina, and L. Solymar, Waves in Metamaterials, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009
Experiments on magnetization waves in photonic metamaterialsS. Linden et al., Science 306, 1351 (2004)G. Dolling et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 231118 (2006)N. Liu et al., Adv. Mater. 20, 4521 (2008)M. Decker et al., Phys. Rev. B 80, 193102 (2009)I. Sersic et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 213902 (2009)
Martin Wegener
- Split-Ring Resonators (SRR)- Getting Started in 2004- Remaining Puzzles in 2011
- Woodpiles and Beyond- Particle Accelerators on a Chip- 3D Visible Invisibility - Wave Cloak or Ray Cloak?
- Conclusions
Tight-binding model (instantaneous interaction):
M. Decker et al., Phys. Rev. B 80, 193102 (2009)
22~ ΩΩ
)(tmn tmn (1 )
)sin( )cos( )Im(
)cos( )cos( )Re(
kaW
kaWΩ
)(~
2 112
nnnnn mmWΩmΩmm
Tight-binding model (instantaneous interaction):
22~ ΩΩ
)(tmn tmn (1 )
)sin( )cos( )Im(
)cos( )cos( )Re(
kaW
kaWΩ
)(~
2 112
nnnnn mmWΩmΩmm
M. Decker et al., Phys. Rev. B 80, 193102 (2009)
Tight-binding model (with retardation):
22~ ΩΩ
)sin( )cos( )Im(
)cos( )cos( )Re(
kaW
kaWΩ
)(tmn tmn (1 00 ; )iexp( ) ΩtWWt
)(~
2 112
nnnnn mmWΩmΩmm
M. Decker et al., Phys. Rev. B 80, 193102 (2009)
3
Tight-binding model (special example):
22~ ΩΩ
)(tmn tmn (1
2
)sin( )cos( )Im(
)cos( )cos( )Re(
kaW
kaWΩ
00 ; )iexp( ) ΩtWWt
)(~
2 112
nnnnn mmWΩmΩmm
M. Decker et al., Phys. Rev. B 80, 193102 (2009)
Electron Micrographs
40-nm thick Au SRR, 500-nm scale bar
a=280 nm
Electron Micrographs
a=300 nm
40-nm thick Au SRR, 500-nm scale bar
Electron Micrographs
a=325 nm
40-nm thick Au SRR, 500-nm scale bar
Electron Micrographs
a=350 nm
40-nm thick Au SRR, 500-nm scale bar
Electron Micrographs
a=400 nm
40-nm thick Au SRR, 500-nm scale bar
4
Electron Micrographs
a=500 nm
40-nm thick Au SRR, 500-nm scale bar
Electron Micrographs
a=550 nm
40-nm thick Au SRR, 500-nm scale bar
Electron Micrographs
a=600 nm
40-nm thick Au SRR, 500-nm scale bar
Electron Micrographs
a=700 nm
40-nm thick Au SRR, 500-nm scale bar
Measured Spectra
M. Decker et al., submitted (2011) M. Decker et al., submitted (2011)
Experimental Geometry
5
In-Plane Dispersion
M. Decker et al., submitted (2011)
In-Plane Dispersion
M. Decker et al., submitted (2011)
No Retardation
M. Decker et al., submitted (2011)
Retardation & NN
M. Decker et al., submitted (2011)
M. Decker et al., submitted (2011)
Retardation & …
M. Decker et al., submitted (2011)
Three Dipoles
6
M. Decker et al., submitted (2011)
Dipole Chain
M. Decker et al., submitted (2011)
Numerics 2D SRR Array
Martin Wegener
- Split-Ring Resonators (SRR)- Getting Started in 2004- Remaining Puzzles in 2011
- Woodpiles and Beyond- Particle Accelerators on a Chip- 3D Visible Invisibility - Wave Cloak or Ray Cloak?
- Conclusions
Woodpile Structure
C.M. Soukoulis et al., Solid State Commun. 89, 413 (1994)
Woodpile Structure
C.M. Soukoulis et al., Solid State Commun. 89, 413 (1994)
Woodpile Structure
C.M. Soukoulis et al., Solid State Commun. 89, 413 (1994)
7
Woodpile Structure
C.M. Soukoulis et al., Solid State Commun. 89, 413 (1994) C.M. Soukoulis et al., Solid State Commun. 89, 413 (1994)
Woodpile Structure
fcc for (c/a)2=2, full gap for index contrast >1.9, 25% gap for holes in Si
scheme not to scale, actual NA=1.4, Tolga Ergin
3D Direct Laser Writing (DLW)
10 µm
M. Deubel et al., Nature Mater. 3, 444 (2004)
10 µm
M. Deubel et al., Nature Mater. 3, 444 (2004) I. Staude et al., Opt. Lett. 35, 1094 (2010)
Complete 3D PBG @ 1.55 μm
8
I. Staude et al., Opt. Lett. 36, 67 (2011)
3D Waveguide Architectures
Martin Wegener
- Split-Ring Resonators (SRR)- Getting Started in 2004- Remaining Puzzles in 2011
- Woodpiles and Beyond- Particle Accelerators on a Chip- 3D Visible Invisibility - Wave Cloak or Ray Cloak?
- Conclusions
Stanford Linear Accelerator (SLAC)
B.M. Cowen, Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. Acell. Beams 11, 011301 (2008)
Particle Accelerator on a Chip
mirror plane
termination
Si
Martin Wegener
- Split-Ring Resonators (SRR)- Getting Started in 2004- Remaining Puzzles in 2011
- Woodpiles and Beyond- Particle Accelerators on a Chip- 3D Visible Invisibility - Wave Cloak or Ray Cloak?
- Conclusions
9
3D Carpet Cloak 2D Carpet Cloak
T. Ergin et al., Science 328, 337 (2010)
3D Carpet Cloak
single NV center in diamond: E. Rittweger et al., Nature Photonics 3, 144 (2009)
STED Microscopy
Martin Wegener
Stimulated Emission Depletion (STED) microscopyS.W. Hell et al., Opt. Lett. 19, 78 (1994)S.W. Hell et al., Nature Methods 6, 24 (2009) E. Rittweger et al., Nature Photonics 3, 144 (2009)
STED inspired DLW lithographyL. Li et al., Science 324, 910 (2009)T.F. Scott et al., Science 324, 913 (2009)J. Fischer et al., Adv. Mater. 22, 3578 (2010)
STED Microscopy
Joachim Fischer
Jablonski Diagram
10
Joachim Fischer
Jablonski Diagram STED-DLW Photoresist
0.25% wt 7-diethylamino-3-thenoylcoumarin in pentaerythritol tetraacrylate (+ quencher)
scattering off 100-nm Au beads in monomer
x
z
x
y
200 nm
200 nm
DLW @ 810 nm
Measured Foci
lateral STED @ 532 nm
Measured Foci
scattering off 100-nm Au beads in monomer
200 nm
200 nm
x
z
x
y
axial STED @ 532 nm
Measured Foci
scattering off 100-nm Au beads in monomer
200 nm
200 nm
x
z
x
y
J. Fischer et al., Opt. Lett. 36, 2059 (2011)
Electron Micrograph
crystal: woodpilerod spacing: 350 nm
bump width: 6 μmbump height: 0.5 μm
cloak height: 5 μmcloak width: 50 μm
Au thickness: 100 nm
DLW power: 10 mWSTED power: 50 mWduty cycle: 3%; 4 kHz
mode: HDRscale bar: 10 μm
11
Optical Micrographs
700-nm illumination, NA=0.4, circular polarization
Top ViewBottom View
Optical Micrographs
700-nm illumination, NA=0.4, circular polarization
Top ViewBottom View
700-nm illumination, NA=0.4, circular polarization
Top ViewBottom View
“Not-Seeing is Believing”
ray-tracing theory: T. Ergin et al., Opt. Express 18, 20535 (2010)
Direct Comparison
ExperimentTheory
Dark-Field Mode
ExperimentTheory
30-degree tilt of sample along bump axis Martin Wegener
- Split-Ring Resonators (SRR)- Getting Started in 2004- Remaining Puzzles in 2011
- Woodpiles and Beyond- Particle Accelerators on a Chip- 3D Visible Invisibility - Wave Cloak or Ray Cloak?
- Conclusions
12
Wave Cloak or Ray Cloak?
www.howstuffworks.com & www.mamapop.com U. Leonhardt and T. Tyc, Science 323, 110 (2009)
Non-Euclidian Ray Cloak
Martin Wegener
- Split-Ring Resonators (SRR)- Getting Started in 2004- Remaining Puzzles in 2011
- Woodpiles and Beyond- Particle Accelerators on a Chip- 3D Visible Invisibility - Wave Cloak or Ray Cloak?
- Conclusions
Science 306, 1351 (2004); submitted (2011)
Opt. Lett. 36, 67 (2011); in preparation (2011)
Science 328, 337 (2010) & 330, 1633 (2010)
“accelerator on a chip” STED-DLW
Opt. Lett. 36, 2059 (2011); unpublished (2011)