-
8/3/2019 Writing Legal Opinions and Corporate Resolutions
1/22
The Plain English Approach
to Writing Legal Opinions
-
8/3/2019 Writing Legal Opinions and Corporate Resolutions
2/22
Legal opinion or Opinion Letter
An opinion of law consisting of writtenadvice provided to a client, who may
choose how to act after considering theadvice.
-
8/3/2019 Writing Legal Opinions and Corporate Resolutions
3/22
-
8/3/2019 Writing Legal Opinions and Corporate Resolutions
4/22
Writing Good Legal OpinionsBryan A. Garner, The Red Book: A Manual on Legal Style, p. 299 (2002)
An opinion letter should openwith a
summary of the issue and your
conclusionsThe opening should set forthevery assumption on which the opinion isbased, the basic facts (woven into theissue), and the conclusion (with a briefstatement of its basis).
-
8/3/2019 Writing Legal Opinions and Corporate Resolutions
5/22
Then, after the summary, a fullstatement of facts may appear. Some
opinions do not require a lengthy factsection; others, such aspatent
infringement or insurance coverage, dorequire one.
-
8/3/2019 Writing Legal Opinions and Corporate Resolutions
6/22
Bryan A. Garner, The Red Book: A Manual on Legal Style, p. 299(2002)
The body [then] explains what legal
principles apply, where they are derived
from, and how they apply to the facts.The conclusion then restates the main
findings, preferably in a slightly differentform (do not simply repeat the summary).
-
8/3/2019 Writing Legal Opinions and Corporate Resolutions
7/22
Outline of a Legal Opinion
Issue Presented
Answer or Opinion;
Assumptions on which the Opinion is Based; Statement of Facts;
Legal Analysis:
What legal principles apply;
Where they derive from; and
How they apply to the facts.
Conclusion.
-
8/3/2019 Writing Legal Opinions and Corporate Resolutions
8/22
Bryan A. Garner, The Red Book: A Manual on Legal Style (2002)
Clients who seek opinions want to know what theirrights and liabilities are and what the possible legalconsequences are in a given situation. Avoid meanderingbefore giving an answer[A]n opinion letter should not
resemble a treatise or law-review article. Focus on the
specific facts presented and the particular legal issue towhich they give rise, with a full assessment of the controllinglegal principles. State your conclusions and advice as clearlyas possible. Avoid giving a broad answer that could beapplied to a different question or to the same question butwith significantly different facts. Use plain English. If you uselegal terms that the client may not know, explain them.
-
8/3/2019 Writing Legal Opinions and Corporate Resolutions
9/22
Common Faults
(1) Non-responsive opinion.
(2) Template-driven opinion.
(3) Jumping to conclusions.
-
8/3/2019 Writing Legal Opinions and Corporate Resolutions
10/22
Bryan A. Garner, The Red Book: A Manual on Legal Style (2002)
An opinion letter is ineffective if it does notboth pose a clear issue and answer it. Not everyissue has a firm yes-or-no answer, but an
unambiguous conclusion should be stated withonly specific and necessary qualifications orreservationsReaching an unnecessarilytentative conclusion, hedged with generalreservations and qualifications, wont give theclient an answer that he or she can understand orany confidence in your advice.
-
8/3/2019 Writing Legal Opinions and Corporate Resolutions
11/22
Example of a Good Legal OpinionBryan A. Garner, The Red Book: A Manual on Legal Style, p. 303 (2002)
[1] You have asked the firm to review the
performance of your prior counsel, W & P, in
representing your company, Biltmore Corporation,
concerning title issues over Lot 2 (commonly
known as Parcel 3) and the actions of USM Title
Company.
-
8/3/2019 Writing Legal Opinions and Corporate Resolutions
12/22
Bryan A. Garner, The Red Book: A Manual on Legal Style, p.303 (2002)
[2] Specifically, you have asked whether any of W & Ps
advice fell below the standard of care expected of legal
professionals and, if so, whether Biltmore can now sue W &
P for legal malpractice. In brief, we conclude that (1) at leastsome of W & Ps advice fell below the level of skill and
diligence that other members of the legal profession
possess and would use in a similar situation, but (2) an
action based on malpractice would probably fail because
Biltmore will have great difficulty proving that is has incurredactual damages.
-
8/3/2019 Writing Legal Opinions and Corporate Resolutions
13/22
Bryan A. Garner, The Red Book: A Manual on Legal Style, p.303 (2002)
[3] Of course, in discussing the actions and the
advice of W & P, we have the benefit of examining the
actions of W & P in hindsight. We have attempted to form
our opinion on W & Ps action and advice without makingunfair use of the perspective of hindsight. Moreover, a
detailed knowledge of the totality of the communications
between the individuals at W & P and those at Biltmore
might change the facts and assumptions on which thisletter is based.
-
8/3/2019 Writing Legal Opinions and Corporate Resolutions
14/22
Bryan A. Garner, The Red Book: A Manual on Legal Style, p.303 (2002)
[4] Although in many respects W & P did
provide the advice that we believe would have
been appropriate to the situation, most of thematters on which we differ with W & P are those
where competent lawyers could disagree.
-
8/3/2019 Writing Legal Opinions and Corporate Resolutions
15/22
Bryan A. Garner, The Red Book: A Manual on Legal Style, p. 303 (2002)
[5] Yet in one particular area, we believe that W & P failed
to exercise the level of skill and diligence that other members of
the legal profession possess and would use in a similar
situation. Specifically, we believe that W & Ps advice to
Biltmore at the time of the settlement agreement between
Biltmore and USM Title was deficient. This conclusion is based
on our understanding that W & P failed to discuss with Biltmore
the potential scope of the release that Biltmore was to sign and
failed to take the necessary steps to identify other claims thatmight have existed against USM Title claims that appear to
have been released under the language of the agreement.
-
8/3/2019 Writing Legal Opinions and Corporate Resolutions
16/22
Bryan A. Garner, The Red Book: A Manual on Legal Style, p.303 (2002)
x x x
[6] Based on the information we have received,
we find fault with the actions and advice of W & P in
not fully advising Biltmore as a releasing party. But as
explained more fully below, we do not believe that W
& Ps actions give rise to a claim for legal
malpractice, since it is uncertain that all the elementsfor a malpractice claim can be shown.
-
8/3/2019 Writing Legal Opinions and Corporate Resolutions
17/22
Bryan A. Garner, The Red Book: A Manual on Legal Style, p.303 (2002)
[7] A legal malpractice claim arises if (1) the
attorney has a duty to the client to use at least the level
of skill and diligence that other members of the legal
profession possess and use; (2) the attorney fails to usethe appropriate level of skill and diligence in connection
with the clients work; (3) this failure proximately causes
injury to the client; and (4) the client suffers actual loss
or damage as a result of the attorneys failure to actappropriately. [citation omitted]
-
8/3/2019 Writing Legal Opinions and Corporate Resolutions
18/22
Bryan A. Garner, The Red Book: A Manual on Legal Style, p. 303 (2002)
x x x
[8] As discussed above, we believe that W & Phad a duty to explain to Biltmore the fact that therelease could be construed as releasing allfuture
claims against USM Title, whether or not thoseclaims had arisen. The failure of W & P to adviceBiltmore of the potential effect of the release could
arguably give rise to a claim against W & P for legalmalpractice.
-
8/3/2019 Writing Legal Opinions and Corporate Resolutions
19/22
Bryan A. Garner, The Red Book: A Manual on Legal Style, p. 303-304(2002)
[9] But to maintain a malpractice claim, the
alleged malpractice must have cause the client tosuffer actual damages: The mere breach of a
professional duty, causing only nominal damages,speculative harm, or the threat of future harm not
yet realized does not suffice to create a cause ofaction for the attorneys negligence or legal
malpractice. Xxx
-
8/3/2019 Writing Legal Opinions and Corporate Resolutions
20/22
Bryan A. Garner, The Red Book: A Manual on Legal Style, p.303 (2002)
[10] Biltmore has informed us that it is notcertain whether Biltmore would have settled if ithad been informed by W & P that, by signing the
release, Biltmore would be releasing all futureclaims against USM Title. But even if Biltmore hadnot signed the release, the chance of recoveryfrom USM would be speculative at best. If no
damages were suffered by Biltmore, any claim forlegal malpractice would be likely to fail.
-
8/3/2019 Writing Legal Opinions and Corporate Resolutions
21/22
Bryan A. Garner, The Red Book: A Manual on Legal Style, p.303-304 (2002)
[11] In conclusion, we do not believe that theadvice given by or the actions taken by W & P giverise to a claim by Biltmore against W & P for legalmalpractice. Although W & P failed to adviceBiltmore of the potential effect of the release on anyfuture claims that Biltmore may wish to bring againstUSM Title, it is uncertain whether Biltmore hassuffered any damages as a result of W & Ps actions.
This uncertainty of actual damages would make aclaim for legal malpractice difficult to prove.
-
8/3/2019 Writing Legal Opinions and Corporate Resolutions
22/22
Bryan A. Garner, The Red Book: A Manual on Legal Style, p.303 (2002)
[12] Please contact us if you have anyquestions about the matter here discussed,
or any other issues.Very truly yours,