Westlands Neighborhood Response: ZBA Decision Criteria for12 Steadman St. Special Permit Application
Respectfully submitted to the Chelmsford Zoning Board of Appeals
Meeting Date: 14 January, 2010
14 January 2010 2
Summary
“Special permits shall be granted by the special permit granting authority, unless otherwise specified herein, only upon its written determination that the adverse effects of the proposed use will not outweigh its beneficial impacts to the Town or the neighborhood. . .”
Chapter 195, Section 103
In granting this special permit. . .
• Only the applicant will derive benefit
• There are no substantial benefits to the town or the neighborhood
• The town and neighborhood would be encumbered with only adverse effects
14 January 2010 3
Special Permit or Spot Zoning?
“Spot zoning arises where a zoning change designed solely for the economic benefit of the owner of the property receiving special treatment and is not in accordance with a well considered plan for the public welfare.”
Should we even be here?
Ruling by Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court – Court of Appeals
14 January 2010 4
Home Occupation By-Law
Home Occupations shall be… (2) Not more than 25% of the combined floor area of the
residence and any qualified accessory structures shall be used in the home occupation.
Chelmsford Bylaws §195-7
In conversation with Evan Belansky, Director of Community Development, the definition of combined floor area shall be that of Gross Floor Area as defined in the Chelmsford Bylaws 195-108.
14 January 2010 5
Establishing the Gross Floor Area
“THE SECOND FLOOR AND BASEMENT OF HOUSE (PERSONAL SPACE), AND SECOND FLOOR OF GARAGE (OFFICE SPACE) HAVE CEILINGS THAT ARE LESS THAN 7’3”, BUT WERE INCLUDED IN GROSS SPACE ...”
According to the By-Law, GROSS FLOOR AREA is defined as,
“The sum of the horizontal areas of the floors of a building or several buildings on the same lot measured from the exterior face of exterior walls or from the center line of the wall separating two buildings, not including any space where the floor-to-ceiling height is less than seven feet three inches.”
-Chelmsford Bylaws §195-108 Word Usage and Definitions
14 January 2010 6
Business Use % Exceeds 195-7 and Precludes Special Permit Consideration
Without the basement, Gross floor area = 3,418 ft².
4463 ft² - 1045 ft² = 3,418
With a total business use of 1,046 ft², the business use =
30%[796 + 25%(998)] / 3418 = 1046
Consideration of dual use in bedrooms 2 and 3 (98.5 ft²) gives an actualbusiness use of:
33%[98.5+796 + 25%(998)] / 3418 = 1046
14 January 2010 7
Additional Considerations
A Net Floor Area excludes “cellars and attic areas used only for storage, bathrooms, stairwells, elevators, mechanical rooms or areas for service incidental to the operation or maintenance of the building.”
Chelmsford Bylaws §195-108
Using Net Floor Area, Business Use = 33% Total Gross Floor Area (4463) – Basement (1045) – Bathrooms (201) – Stairwells (88) = Net Floor Area (3129) > Business Use (1045.5) / Net Floor Area (3129) = 33%
Under the Massachusetts Basic Building Code, laboratories for testing and research are specifically mentioned as business occupancies.
780 CMR 304.0 Business Group B
The Massachusetts Building Code defines a HABITABLE SPACE as “a space in a building for living, sleeping, eating or cooking. Bathrooms, toilet rooms, closets,
halls, storage or utility spaces and similar areas are not considered habitable spaces.” 780 CMR 5202 Definitions
14 January 2010 8
In accordance with the Gross Floor Area Definition
Removing all rooms that do not meet the definitional threshold, the true gross floor area = 1965 ft² Business Use = 387 ft² Dual Purpose Use = 768 ft² Personal Use = 542 ft²
Total Business Use = 579 ft² or overall use of
29%
14 January 2010 9
Chapter 195, Section 103 Criteria
(1) Social, economic or community needs which are served by the proposal;
(2) Traffic flow and safety, including parking and loading;
(3) Adequacy of utilities and other public services;
(4) Neighborhood character and social structures;
(5) Impacts on the natural environment; and
(6) Potential fiscal impact, including impact on town services, tax base and employment
14 January 2010 10
Criteria (1): Social, economic or community needs Zoning bylaws and Master Plan recognize inherent social benefit of
residential-only neighborhoods Special permit would create a precedent that amounts to spot zoning If it’s not spot zoning, it’s a “new” zone w/o TM approval or review. –
Anyone could have employees and customers on-site Customers derive no benefit from OBCM’s operating in a residential
setting – may even prefer working with a company operating more professionally
Non-household employees do not reside in Chelmsford; one lives out-of-state
Not using commercial real estate = empty commercial space; more economic benefit if NOT operating in home
OBCM website stresses growth goals – in commercial space, business can move steadily ahead and legally add employees in line with growth
No public infrastructure improvements offered, such as sidewalks
14 January 2010 11
Criteria (2): Traffic flow and safety
O’Brien Compliance Management has employees, vendors, deliveries, and customers driving in and out of their facility daily
12 Steadman St. is in very close proximity to Chelmsford St. intersection 2nd most dangerous intersection in town Police Chief sees need for cameras at lights to deter traffic
violators Major business growth on Rt. 110 impacting both
Chelmsford St. AND Steadman St. traffic Lowe’s on the Chelmsford/Lowell line Stop & Shop scheduled to begin construction this summer
ANY ADDITIONAL INCREASE IN TRAFFIC IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD HAS SIGNIFICANT SAFETY IMPLICATIONS
14 January 2010 12
Criteria (3): Adequacy of utilities and other public services
Town trash pick-up is intended for residential waste only OBCM is using town trash removal services for both the
residential as well as the business use of its facility Appropriate private trash pickup would require a visible
dumpster on the property which would deter from the character of the neighborhood
14 January 2010 13
Criteria (4): Neighborhood character and social structures
Non-residential employees, vendors, and customers amount to an unknown, transient, population that presents concerns in a neighborhood filled with children
The provision for business signage degrades the residential appearance of the neighborhood
In reality, creates a mixed-use zone Sets a precedent that would allow other businesses to
operate in same fashion ANYWHERE in town
14 January 2010 14
Criteria (5): Impacts on the natural environment
Negligible
14 January 2010 15
Criteria (6): Potential fiscal impact, including town services, tax base and employment Town Services
OBCM has consistently defied compliance with existing bylaws – even with a cease and desist order
Non-compliance history requires monitoring Zoning enforcement exceeds the capacity of the town’s current, over-
taxed Building Department Special permit provisions, such as restricting number of outside
employees to one, is unenforceable in practice Tax Base
Economic deficit – operating since Feb. 09 w/o payment of excise tax on equipment = loss of tax revenue to town
Decrease in home values* = decrease in property assessments = decrease in revenue collection = increased deficits to town
Employment OBCM’s current, non-residential employees do not live in Chelmsford;
one is an out-of-state resident*See next slide for more information
14 January 2010 16
Impact to Property ValuesRelevant to Criteria (1) and (6)
14 Steadman St.
14 Steadman St.
WITHOUT a business operating next door
WITH a business operating next door
Price Differential = <$30,000.00>From Century 21 Market Appraisal Jan. 2010
Assuming 14 Steadman St. is average home in neighborhood,
Multiplied by 21 Abutters* = <$630,000.00> loss
Even a conservative estimate of <$20,000.00>/ home price differential represents an excess of <$400,000.00> drop in market value for abutters
Should our property values subsidize OBCM?
*Total number of abutters = 31; 21 physically and/or visually abut 12 Steadman
14 January 2010 17
Potential Requests forProperty Tax Abatement
Potentially, 21 abutters could be seeking abatements from the town
Should the town’s tax base subsidize OBCM?
Lost Property Tax Revenue
14 January 2010 18
Past History as an Indicator of Future Behavior
Didn’t comply with
Lowell’s bylaws
Due to a significant increase in new business, OBCM has hired it’s fourth employee. OBCM proudly announces the hiring of a new Engineering staff member, Pooja Soni.
From OBCM website: 2 Sep 2008OBCM hires new Project Engineer; Staff up to four
• Enter and Exit signs appear on 10/9 for Customer Open House.
• Told to remove signage.
• Signs re-appeared on 10/13 in preparation for a customer visit.
Defied initial order from Chelmsford Building Inspector re signage
14 January 2010 19
Past History as an Indicator of Future Behavior, cont’d
Despite formal notices, OBCM continued to be out of compliance.
14 January 2010 20
Past History as an Indicator of Future Behavior, cont’d
> 3 Hours
4 Times
4 - 7 Hours
10 Times
8+ Hours
3 Times
In December 2009, OBCM employees were on-premise 17 out of 18 business days
14 January 2010 21
“If you give a mouse a cookie…”
Wanted to “openly” operate against town’s zoning bylaws
Then wanted to operate “covertly” against town’s zoning bylaws and a cease and desist order
Now wants a special permit for one non-household employee
AND wants a variance for another employee
Talks about wanting to hire assistants to Engineers to support growth
Ultimately wants to advance business interests to the detriment of neighborhood and community
In this case, OBCM doesn’t just want a cookie. . .