-
UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl)
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
Molecular and genetic basis of congenital conotruncal heart defects
Rana, M.S.
Publication date2014
Link to publication
Citation for published version (APA):Rana, M. S. (2014). Molecular and genetic basis of congenital conotruncal heart defects.
General rightsIt is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s)and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an opencontent license (like Creative Commons).
Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, pleaselet the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the materialinaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letterto: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Youwill be contacted as soon as possible.
Download date:31 May 2021
https://dare.uva.nl/personal/pure/en/publications/molecular-and-genetic-basis-of-congenital-conotruncal-heart-defects(53e1025c-8dcb-48f3-8e1e-d9ee29ce3dd2).html
-
Chapter 5
Identification of a Tbx1/Tbx2/Tbx3 genetic pathway governing pharyngeal and
arterial pole morphogenesis
K. Mesbah*, M.S. Rana*, A. Francou, K. van Duijvenboden, V.E. Papaioannou, A.F.M. Moorman,
R.G. Kelly, V.M. Christoffels
Human Molecular Genetics 2012 Mar 15;21(6):1217‐29
*equal contribution
-
118
Abstract
The 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) is the most common microdeletion disorder and is characterized by abnormal development of the pharyngeal apparatus and heart. Cardiovascular malformations affecting the outflow tract (OFT) are frequently observed in 22q11.2DS and are among the most commonly occuring heart defects. The gene encoding T‐box transcription factor 1 (Tbx1) has been identified as a major candidate for 22q11.2DS. However, cardiovascular malformations are generally considered to have a multigenic basis and single gene mutations underlying these malformations are rare. The T‐box family members Tbx2 and Tbx3 are individually required in regulating aspects of OFT and pharyngeal development. Here, using expression and 3D‐reconstruction analysis, we show that Tbx1 and Tbx2/Tbx3 are largely uniquely expressed but overlap in the caudal pharyngeal mesoderm during OFT development, suggesting potential combinatorial requirements. Cross‐regulation between Tbx1 and Tbx2/Tbx3 was analyzed using mouse genetics and revealed that Tbx1 deficiency affects Tbx2 and Tbx3 expression in neural crest‐derived cells and pharyngeal mesoderm, whereas Tbx2 and Tbx3 function redundantly upstream of Tbx1 and Hh ligand expression in pharyngeal endoderm and BMP‐ and FGF‐signaling in cardiac progenitors. Moreover, in vivo we show that loss of two of the three genes results in severe pharyngeal hypoplasia and heart tube extension defects. These findings reveal an indispensable T‐box gene network governing pharyngeal and OFT development and identify TBX2 and TBX3 as potential modifier genes of the cardiopharyngeal phenotypes found in TBX1 haploinsufficient 22q11.2DS patients.
-
119
Introduction
22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) comprises DiGeorge syndrome, velocardiofacial syndrome and conotruncal anomaly face syndrome and is the most common interstitial microdeletion syndrome with an estimated prevalence of 1 per 4,000 live births1. 22q11.2DS patients exhibit a wide spectrum of developmental anomalies, including craniofacial defects, hypoplasia of the thymus and parathyroid glands and conotruncal cardiovascular malformations (CVMs). CVMs are the leading cause of birth defect‐related death in the western world2, 3. Defects in the formation of the arterial pole of the heart, or outflow tract (OFT), account for up to 30% of CVMs. Formation of the OFT is a complex process, requiring spatial and temporal expression of genes in multiple interacting cell types. A population of mesodermal progenitor cells called the second heart field (SHF) residing in splanchnic pharyngeal mesoderm in the dorsal wall of the pericardial cavity is progressively added to the elongating arterial pole of the embryonic heart tube giving rise to the right ventricle and OFT 4. These SHF cells are closely associated with neural crest (NC)‐derived mesenchyme and pharyngeal endoderm, and complex autocrine and paracrine signaling events regulate SHF development, including pro‐proliferative fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signals and pro‐differentiation bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signals5‐7. Direct or indirect perturbation of second heart field development leads to failure of correct alignment between the great arteries and ventricles during cardiac septation resulting in conotruncal CVMs. However, the mechanisms coordinating intercellular signaling events during SHF deployment remain insufficiently understood.
While single gene mutations or chromosomal abnormalities cause certain CVMs or syndromes, the majority of CVMs appear to have a multifactorial basis. Despite this, little is known about the networks of interacting genes that control cardiac or pharyngeal morphogenesis. Several scenarios involving interactions of multiple genes with major or minor effects have been proposed to explain the complex inheritance and variability of CVMs8. T‐box transcription factors play a series of critical roles in patterning and morphogenesis of the vertebrate heart6, 9. TBX1 is a major candidate gene in the etiology of 22q11.2DS, contributing to a variable phenotypic spectrum including conotruncal congenital heart defects10. In mice, haploinsufficiency of Tbx1 causes fourth pharyngeal arch artery (PAA) defects, whereas Tbx1 null mutants display most of the severe defects found in 22q11.2DS patients, including common arterial trunk11‐13. Tbx1 is required in pharyngeal mesoderm to regulate proliferation and differentiation of SHF progenitor cells7, 14‐17. This function is mediated in part by the regulation of FGF ligand expression and signal response18, 19. Other T‐box proteins known to impact on OFT development are the closely related paralogs Tbx2 and Tbx3. Heterozygous mutations in TBX3 cause Ulnar‐Mammary syndrome, but usually do not include heart defects20. Nevertheless, mouse studies have shown that Tbx3 plays important roles in the development of the cardiac conduction system21. Moreover, whereas Tbx3 haploinsufficiency does not affect heart development, Tbx3 loss‐of‐function results in OFT alignment defects including double outlet right ventricle22, 23. The role of Tbx3 in OFT development appears to be indirect as Tbx3 is predominantly expressed in cardiac NC cells and ventral pharyngeal endoderm, rather than pharyngeal mesoderm22, 23. The paralogous gene Tbx2 is expressed in pharyngeal mesoderm, including the SHF and OFT, and in NC‐derived cells. Although Tbx2 haploinsufficient mice appear normal, a fraction of Tbx2 null embryos develop OFT alignment defects24, 25.
-
120
Here we show that Tbx2 and Tbx3 are required redundantly during OFT development to attenuate Tbx1 expression in the ventral foregut, but also depend on Tbx1 for their correct distribution in pharyngeal mesoderm, endoderm and NC cells. Furthermore, loss of function of Tbx1 and either Tbx2 or Tbx3 also causes severe defects during OFT and foregut development, suggesting that these three genes (Tbx1/Tbx2/Tbx3) comprise a crucial regulatory network controlling the topography of intercellular signaling during pharyngeal and OFT development. When disrupted, this network fails to properly orchestrate morphogenesis of the pharyngeal apparatus and cardiovascular system. Our results underscore the clinical relevance of this Tbx1/Tbx2/Tbx3 network which potentially contributes to the phenotypic variation of congenital cardiopharyngeal malformations in the 22q11.2DS patient population.
Materials and Methods
Transgenic mice
Tbx1tm1Pa (synonym: Tbx1‐; 11‐13), Tbx1tm1Bld (synonyms: Tbx1LacZ , Tbx1‐ 12), Tbx2Δ2 (synonym: Tbx2‐ 48), Tbx3tm1Pa (synonym: Tbx3‐ 49) and Tbx3tm1.1(cre)Vmc (synonyms: Tbx3Cre, Tbx3‐ 50) mice have been described previously. Homozygosity for above‐mentioned alleles is also indicated as ‐/‐. All strains were maintained on mixed or outbred (Bl6/CD1 or FVB/N) backgrounds. Embryos were staged considering noon of the day of the copulation plug as embryonic day (E) 0.5. Embryos were isolated in ice‐cold 1x Phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS), fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 1‐4 hours, examined and processed for in situ hybridization or immunohistochemistry. Genomic DNA obtained from yolk sac or tail biopsies was used for genotyping by PCR, using primers described in the above references.
Immunohistochemistry
Embryos were collected and whole embryos or trunk regions were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, dehydrated and embedded in paraffin prior to sectioning at 7‐12 μm for immunohistochemistry (IHC), in situ hybridization (ISH) and haemotoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. IHC was performed on hydrated sections treated for 15 min with antigen unmasking solution (Vector) or pressure‐cooked for 4 min in Antigen unmasking solution (H‐3300, Vector Laboratories). The sections were processed according to the TSA tetramethylrhodamine system protocol (NEL702001KT, Perkin Elmer LAS). Primary antibodies were incubated overnight. Primary antibody concentrations were: Tbx1 (1/100, Zymed), Tbx3 (1/200, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), Islet‐1 (clone 40.2D6 : 1/100, DSHB), AP‐2α (1/50, clone 3B5 DSHB), phospho‐ERK (1/100, phospho‐p44/42 MAPK (Thr202/Tyr204) (20G11) Cell Signaling) phospho‐SMAD (1/100, Phospho‐Smad1 (Ser463/465)/ Smad5 (Ser463/465)/ Smad8 (Ser426/428), 9511, Cell Signaling). Secondary antibody concentrations were: anti‐species Alexa 488 (1/500, Jackson), Alexa 680 (1:250, Molecular Probes), Alexa 647 (1:250, Molecular Probes), Alexa 568 (1:250, Molecular Probes) and Cy3 (1/500, Jackson). Sections were counterstained with Hoechst, Sytox Green nucleic acid stain
-
121
(1:30,000; Molecular Probes) or Dapi (1:40,000; Molecular Probes) and observed using an ApoTome microscope (Zeiss).
In situ hybridization
Nonradioactive ISH on sections was performed as described 51 using mRNA probes for the detection of Tbx2 52, lacZ, Tbx3, Tbx1, Fgf8, Bmp4, Isl1, Mlc2a and Shh 23. Sections were counterstained with Nuclear Fast Red. For whole‐mount in situ hybridization embryos were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and processed as described 27.
Ink injection
Visualization of pharyngeal arch artery formation at E10.5 by ink injection into the embryonic ventricle was carried out as described 53.
3D‐reconstruction of gene expression patterns and morphology
Image acquisition of serial sections stained by ISH or IHC, and processing for subsequent 3D reconstructions was performed using a previously described method using Amira 5.2 software 54. The mRNA expression patterns were independently confirmed in at least two additional embryos.
Results
Three‐dimensional analysis of Tbx1, Tbx2 and Tbx3 transcript distribution in the cardiopharyngeal region
In order to understand the multigenic cause of cardiopharyngeal defects observed in 22q11.2DS, we first explored whether Tbx1, Tbx2 and Tbx3 could be expected to function co‐operatively during arterial pole development. This was achieved by examining their expression patterns relative to each other by in situ hybridization (Figure 1A‐C) and fluorescent immunohistochemistry (Figure 1D‐F) in wildtype embryonic day (E) 8.5 and E9.5 embryos, stages at which SHF cells are added to the elongating heart tube. To facilitate a more accurate identification of unique and overlapping expression sites in the cardiopharyngeal region, we generated 3D‐reconstructions of transcript distributions for these three genes (Figure 1G‐L; Supplementary Material, Figure S1; Supplemental 3D‐PDF file). At E8.5 and E9.5, Tbx1 is expressed in lateral pharyngeal endoderm (arrows in Figure 1A, arrowhead in 1F) and surrounding mesoderm, in the SHF and in surface ectoderm (Figure 1D‐F). In pharyngeal endoderm, Tbx3 primarily accumulates ventrally (Figure 1C, arrowhead; 1D‐F), overlapping with Tbx2 in the endoderm underlying the aortic sac (Figure 1K, L, arrow). Tbx2 and Tbx3 are also co‐expressed in NC‐derived mesenchyme (Figure 1B, C, black arrow; 1I, arrow) and the dorsal and lateral pericardial wall at E9.5 (Figure 1B, C, green arrow). Overlap between Tbx1 and Tbx2 was observed in mesoderm lateral to and underlying ventral pharyngeal endoderm (Figure 1A, B, arrowhead), including SHF cells. A small patch of
-
122
overlapping Tbx1 and Tbx3 expression was also observed in the dorsal pericardial wall (Supplementary Material, Figure S2; Supplemental 3D‐PDF file). Unlike Tbx1 and Tbx3, Tbx2 is robustly expressed in the myocardial wall of the developing OFT at E9.5 (Figure 1G, I). Tbx2 and Tbx3 are co‐expressed in distal OFT mesenchyme at this stage (Figure 1B, C, K). In summary, Tbx2 and Tbx3 are extensively co‐expressed, whereas Tbx1 demonstrates a more distinct pattern in pharyngeal mesoderm and endoderm (Figure 1J).
Figure 1. Unique and overlapping expression patterns of Tbx1, Tbx2 and Tbx3. In situ hybridization at E9.5 showing Tbx1 (A), Tbx2 (B) and Tbx3 (C) mRNA in pharyngeal endoderm (A, arrows; C, arrowhead), neural crest‐derived mesenchyme (B, C, black arrow) and pharyngeal mesoderm (A, B, arrowheads; B, C, green arrows). At E8.5 (D, E) and E9.5 (F), Tbx1 protein (red) was found in lateral pharyngeal endoderm (L‐end, arrowhead), pharyngeal mesoderm (mes) and surface ectoderm (se) and Tbx3 protein (green) in ventral pharyngeal endoderm (V‐end) and neural crest‐derived mesenchyme (arrow). Three‐dimensional reconstructions showing unique and overlapping (black arrow) sites of expression of Tbx1/Tbx3 (G), Tbx1/Tbx2 (H) and Tbx2/Tbx3 (I). (J) Summary of expression sites of Tbx1–2–3 at E8.5–9.5. Note that ventral endodermal Tbx2 expression is restricted to where endoderm underlies the aortic sac. Cross sections (K) of corresponding three‐dimensional models (G, H, I, dashed line). Note the overlap between Tbx2 and Tbx3 in ventral endoderm (L, arrow). avc, atrioventricular canal; dpw, dorsal pericardial wall; la, left atrium; lv, left ventricle; oft, outflow tract; ov, otic vesicle; pa1, 2, 1st and 2nd pharyngeal arch; ph, pharynx; pp1–3, first, second and third pharyngeal pouches; ra, right atrium; rv, right ventricle. Scale bar in (A) and (D) is 100 mm and in (E) and (F) is 50 µm.
Loss of Tbx1 affects Tbx2 and Tbx3 expression in the caudal pharynx SHF signaling pathways are affected in Tbx1 null mutant embryos resulting in hypoplasia of the distal OFT at midgestation26. To determine whether this OFT phenotype coincides with altered expression of Tbx2 and Tbx3, we examined the expression patterns of all three genes by in situ hybridization on whole embryos and transverse sections in wildtype and Tbx1‐/‐ embryos. The level of Tbx2 expression was reduced in the pharyngeal region in E9.5 Tbx1‐/‐
-
123
embryos (Figure 2C, D) compared to controls (Figure 2A, B). In contrast, the expression domain of Tbx2 was expanded in the first arch of Tbx1 null embryos (Figure 2C, arrowhead)27. Tbx2 was downregulated in the dorsal pericardial wall (Figure 2F, red surface), and the area of co‐expression with Tbx1 in the SHF was thus greatly reduced in size (purple surface in Figure 2F). Similarly, accumulation of Tbx3 transcripts was reduced in the caudal pharyngeal region including the dorsal pericardial wall (Figure 2I, bracket; Supplementary Material, Figure S2B, D), and expanded in the first arch of Tbx1‐/‐ embryos at E9.5 (Figure 2I, arrow).
Previous work has documented reduced NC‐derived cell numbers in the caudal pharyngeal region of Tbx1 null mutants, showing that Tbx1‐responsive Gbx2 signaling from pharyngeal ectoderm is required for proper guidance of the adjacently located NC cells to the caudal pharynx, where Tbx2 and Tbx3 are co‐expressed 28, 29. We thus analyzed and quantified the number of NC‐derived cells in wildtype and Tbx1 null mutant embryos by labeling NC‐derived cells with an Ap2α antibody, and found a 50% reduction in the number of Ap2α‐positive NC‐derived cells and, among the remaining cells, a 20% reduction of the fraction of Tbx3‐positive cells compared to the wildtype situation (n=3 embryos of each genotype; Figure 2H, J, K). Hence loss of Tbx3 expression in Tbx1‐/‐ embryos reflects both reduced numbers of crest‐derived cells and a reduction of Tbx2‐ and Tbx3‐positive crest cells. In wildtype embryos, Tbx2 and Tbx3 overlap in ventral pharyngeal endoderm. In the hypoplastic foregut of Tbx1‐/‐ embryos, we observed that ventral expression of Tbx2 was decreased (Figure 2M, arrow), whereas Tbx3 expression was maintained (Figure 2O). Thus, Tbx1‐deficiency affects Tbx2 and Tbx3 expression in mesodermal, NC‐derived and endodermal cells in the caudal pharynx, supporting a requirement for Tbx1 upstream of Tbx2 and Tbx3 during OFT development.
Compound Tbx2‐Tbx3‐deficiency affects endodermal Tbx1 expression and key signaling molecules in the SHF
We next assessed whether Tbx1 expression is affected in the absence of paralogs Tbx2 or Tbx3 by analyzing E9.5 Tbx2‐/‐ and Tbx3‐/‐ mouse embryos using in situ hybridization on transverse sections. The overall expression pattern of Tbx1 was found to be normal in both Tbx2 and Tbx3 null mutants (Figure 3, Tbx1). Because Tbx2 and Tbx3 are co‐expressed in multiple regions and share common targets in the heart, they could function redundantly to regulate Tbx1 and OFT development 9. We thus generated mice double heterozygous for Tbx2 and Tbx3 null alleles. Only a few such mice were obtained because this genotype is afflicted with severe craniofacial defects 30. Tbx2;Tbx3 double heterozygous mice were interbred to obtain Tbx2‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos (Table 1). Tbx2‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos could be recovered up to E9.5 (n=11/150) at mendelian ratios and displayed impaired overall embryonic growth, pericardial edema and hypoplasia of the OFT and right ventricle (Figure 3D; Supplementary Material, Figure S3C, D). Tbx1 expression is restricted to lateral pharyngeal endoderm in wildtype, Tbx2‐/‐ and Tbx3‐/‐ embryos. In Tbx2‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos, Tbx1 was upregulated in the subdomain of the ventral endoderm that normally co‐expresses Tbx2 and Tbx3 (Figure 3, Tbx1, arrowhead; Supplementary Material, Figure S3L, arrow; Figure 1L, arrow). In contrast, Tbx1 expression was unchanged in pharyngeal mesoderm and in lateral pharyngeal endoderm that do not co‐express these factors. This observation
-
124
suggests functional redundancy of Tbx2 and Tbx3 in the suppression of Tbx1 expression in ventral pharyngeal endoderm.
Figure 2. Tbx2 and Tbx3 are affected by loss of Tbx1. Tbx2 and Tbx3 expression is broader in the first arch (arrowhead in C and I) and reduced in the caudal pharynx (brackets in C and I; arrows in D and J) of E9.5 Tbx1 null embryos. Three‐dimensional reconstructions of the dorsal pericardial wall showed a smaller overlapping region of Tbx1/Tbx2 (compare purple region in E with F) and reduced detection of Tbx2 mRNA (D, arrowheads, blue region absent in F) in the dorsal pericardial wall of Tbx1‐/‐ embryos. Immunofluorescence and histograms (K) showing a reduction in Tbx3‐positive mesenchymal cells (J, white arrows), Ap2a‐positive neural crest‐derived cells (K) and Tbx3‐positive/Ap2a‐positive cells (compare yellow staining in H with J; K) in Tbx1‐/‐
embryos. 3D‐reconstructions reveal loss of Tbx2 expression in ventral pharyngeal endoderm (M, arrow), whereas expression of Tbx3 is maintained in pharyngeal endoderm of Tbx1‐/‐ embryos (O, yellow). Ca, caudal; Cr, cranial; D, dorsal; dpw, dorsal pericardial wall; L, left lateral; la, left atrium; lv, left ventricle; pa1, first pharyngeal arch; ph, pharynx; pp1–3; first, second and third pharyngeal pouch; R, right lateral; ra, right atrium; V, ventral. Scale bar is 100 µm.
-
125
The LIM homeodomain transcription factor Isl1 is expressed in undifferentiated cardiac progenitors in the SHF and in the distal OFT. In Tbx2‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos, Isl1 transcripts could still be detected in SHF cells and the shortened OFT, suggesting that the deployment of SHF cells is compromised downstream of Isl1 expression (Supplementary Material, Figure S3D, arrow). We therefore examined the expression patterns of known regulators of SHF development. Shh has been implicated in proliferation and deployment of cardiac progenitor cells and in signaling events required for cardiac NC survival from an expression site in ventral pharyngeal endoderm 31. Moreover, Shh has been reported to regulate Tbx1 in pharyngeal endoderm and arches 32, 33. Shh expression in ventral pharyngeal endoderm was decreased, concomitant with the increased expression of Tbx1, in Tbx2‐/‐
;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos, but not in Tbx2 or Tbx3 single mutants (Figure 3, Shh, arrowhead).
We subsequently investigated FGF signaling, also known to play a critical role in regulating SHF progenitor cell proliferation in pharyngeal mesoderm distal to the OFT. Fgf8 appears to be the major FGF ligand driving heart tube elongation and Fgf8 and Tbx1 have been linked genetically during vascular morphogenesis and to the etiology of 22q11.2DS 6,18, 34,35. At E9.5 Fgf8 is co‐expressed with Tbx1 in lateral pharyngeal endoderm, overlying surface ectoderm and, at low level, in pharyngeal mesoderm lateral to the pharynx including SHF progenitor cells 15, 36, 37. We found elevated Fgf8 transcript accumulation in the SHF and OFT of compound Tbx2‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos (Figure 3, Fgf8, red arrowheads, Supplementary Material, Figure S3K, arrowhead).
BMP signaling induces cardiac differentiation and antagonizes FGF signaling proximally to the OFT during heart tube extension 7. We therefore included Bmp4, known to be a crucial BMP ligand during OFT development, in our expression pattern analyses 38. We observed a decrease in Bmp4 transcript levels in ventral pharyngeal endoderm, where Tbx2 and Tbx3 are normally co‐expressed, as well as in pharyngeal mesoderm including the SHF and distal OFT of Tbx2‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos (Figure 3, Bmp4, arrowheads). Bmp4 and Nkx2‐5 expression in the dorsal pericardial wall has been reported to depend on GATA family member Gata6, where it is required for proper maturation of cardiomyocyte precursors 39. In Tbx2‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos, in situ hybridization revealed a decrease in Gata6 expression in the dorsal pericardial wall, presumably affecting BMP‐signaling in the SHF (data not shown). Albeit slightly less severe, a shortened OFT, hypoplastic right ventricle and modulations in FGF and BMP ligand and Shh expression were also observed in Tbx2‐/‐;Tbx3+/‐ and Tbx2+/‐
;Tbx3‐/‐ compound mutants (Figure 3E, I; n=21 and n=15, respectively, Table 1; n=3 as examined by in situ hybridization). However, endodermal expression of Tbx1 was unaffected in these compound mutant embryos (Figure 3E, Tbx1). These results indicate gene dosage effects and functional redundancy between Tbx2 and Tbx3, as a single allele of either gene is insufficient to activate normal FGF and BMP and Hh signaling pathways, yet is sufficient to repress Tbx1 in ventral endoderm.
Taken together, our findings indicate that endodermal Tbx1 and the abovementioned signaling molecules are potential downstream effectors of the redundant actions of Tbx2 and Tbx3, impacting on both pharyngeal and OFT development.
-
126
Figure 3. Morphological, Tbx1 expression and signaling component analysis in Tbx2;Tbx3 compound mutant embryos. Severe hypoplasia of the outflow tract and right ventricle, ectopic distribution of Tbx1 mRNA and decreased expression of Bmp4 and Shh in the ventral endoderm (black arrowheads) were observed in E9.5 Tbx2‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos compared with wild‐type, Tbx2‐/‐ and Tbx3‐/‐ embryos (A–D). Elevated Fgf8 and decreased Bmp4 expression was observed in splanchnic mesoderm (red arrowheads). Tbx2+/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ and Tbx2‐/‐
;Tbx3+/‐ embryos display similar aberrations in transcript levels of Shh, Fgf8 and Bmp4, but no ventral expansion of endodermal Tbx1 (E). Composite Tbx2;Tbx3 mutant embryos with pharyngeal arch, OFT and RV hypoplasia (G–I). Morphology and three‐dimensional reconstruction of the pharyngeal endoderm showing patterning defects of interpouch endoderm in Tbx2‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos (G′, red arrow) and hypoplasia of the first and second pharyngeal pouches (G′‐I′). dpw, dorsal pericardial wall; lv, left ventricle; pa1–3, first, second and third pharyngeal arch; oft, outflow tract; ph, pharynx; pp1–3; first, second and third pharyngeal pouch; ra, right atrium; rv, right ventricle. Scale bar in (A) is 100 µm. Pharyngeal segmentation defects in Tbx2‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos In vertebrates, the pharyngeal apparatus is a transient structure and contributes to the thymus, thyroid and parathyroid, structures frequently affected in 22q11.2DS. Upon macroscopic examination of Tbx2‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐, Tbx2‐/‐;Tbx3+/‐ and Tbx2+/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ mutants at E9.5,
-
127
the pharyngeal region was observed to be severely affected (Table 1) revealing an underdeveloped first pharyngeal arch, while the more caudal arches were hypoplastic compared to wildtype controls (Figure 3G‐I). The foregut of E9.5 control embryos showed three pharyngeal pouches and two interpouch regions (Figure 3F, F’, pp1‐3). Tbx2‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos displayed some pharyngeal expansion, as the foregut did not acquire the tube‐like shape observed in Tbx1‐/‐ embryos (compare Figure 3G’ with 2M, O). However, interpouch endoderm could not be distinguished (Figure 3G, red arrow). Pharyngeal segmentation was also, albeit less severely, affected in embryos lacking three of the four alleles (Tbx2+/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ and Tbx2‐/‐;Tbx3+/‐), indicating that a developmental delay is not the primary cause of this phenotype (Figure 3H, I). Unfortunately, all compound Tbx2;Tbx3 mutants die by mid‐gestation, making it impossible to study the development and differentiation of pharyngeal precursors of the (para)thyroid and thymus. Nevertheless, our results indicate that proper segmentation of the pharyngeal region requires all four alleles of Tbx2 and Tbx3, suggesting roles during development of the pharyngeal apparatus and possibly its derivatives.
Severe arterial pole defects and altered FGF‐ and BMP‐signaling in Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx2‐/‐ and Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos Since Tbx1 is required for correct pharyngeal expression of Tbx2 and Tbx3, which in turn are redundantly required to attenuate expression of Tbx1 in the ventral endoderm, we hypothesized that these three genes could constitute a regulatory T‐box network. We therefore investigated the combinatorial in vivo requirements for Tbx1 and either Tbx2 or Tbx3 by interbreeding Tbx1;Tbx2 or Tbx1;Tbx3 double heterozygous mice and analyzing the respective compound mutant embryos. Tbx1+/‐;Tbx2+/‐ and Tbx1+/‐;Tbx3+/‐ mice were obtained at the expected mendelian ratio and are viable and fertile. As Tbx3‐deficiency is reported to delay aortic arch artery formation 23, we investigated whether heterozygosity for Tbx3 influences the incidence or severity of pharyngeal arch artery defects in Tbx1+/‐
embryos. We did not find significant changes at either E10.5 or E15.5 (Supplementary Material, Figure S4D). Analysis of E9.5 and E10.5 embryos obtained by interbreeding Tbx1+/‐
;Tbx2+/‐ or Tbx1+/‐;Tbx3+/‐ mice revealed that Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx2‐/‐ embryos were not recovered at the expected mendelian ratio (n=4/134, expected n=8.4/134), in contrast to Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos (12/156). Importantly, 4/4 of Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx2‐/‐ embryos and 9/12 (75%) of Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos displayed impaired overall embryonic growth with development apparently blocked at E8.5 (Figure 4D, J). These embryos all exhibited pericardial edema. Severe hypoplasia of the pharyngeal region was also observed, including underdevelopment of the first arch (Figure 4D, J), which forms relatively normally in Tbx1‐/‐ embryos 11. Expansion and segmentation of the pharyngeal endoderm was mildly affected in Tbx1+/‐;Tbx2‐/‐ embryos compared to wildtype and Tbx1‐/‐ embryos (Supplementary Material, Figure S5C). We could not perform transcript detection or immunohistochemical analyses on Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx2‐/‐
embryos, since 3 out of 4 embryos were necrotic and thus unfit for molecular analysis. We compared cardiac morphology between E9.5 wildtype and Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx2‐/‐ embryos using histological and 3D analyses and found a severely shortened OFT connected to an embryonic ventricle, whereas morphological signs of a developing right ventricle were lacking (Figure 4D, F, n=3). Moreover, the OFT lumen of the mutant heart was extremely narrow or completely obstructed by myocardium.
-
128
Figure 4. Heart tube elongation is severely compromised by loss of Tbx1 and either Tbx2 or Tbx3. Right lateral views at E9.5 showing pharyngeal and cardiac hypoplasia in Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx2‐/‐ (D) and Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos (J). 3D reconstruction of a Tbx1‐/‐
;Tbx2‐/‐ heart revealing a shortened outflow tract with a constricted lumen (F, arrowhead). Transverse sections showing pharyngeal hypoplasia (ph) and a persistent dorsal mesocardium in Tbx1‐/‐
;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos (N, arrow). Milder pharyngeal hypoplasia is observed in Tbx1‐/‐ embryos (L). In situ hybidization showing reduced Tbx5‐negative right ventricular and OFT myocardium in Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos (R). lv, left ventricle; la, left atrium, pa1, 1st pharyngeal arch; oft, outflow tract; ph, pharynx; ra, right atrium; rv, right ventricle. Scale bar is 100 μm.
As we could not isolate a sufficient number of Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx2‐/‐ embryos, we examined transverse sections of Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos, and found that pharyngeal endoderm was severely reduced, and that the dorsal mesocardium failed to close under the hypoplastic pharynx (Figure 4N, arrow). Gene expression analysis revealed that Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ hearts were almost entirely positive for Tbx5 transcripts, normally restricted to the left ventricle and inflow regions of the heart (Figure 4O‐R). In addition, very few Isl1‐positive cells were observed at the arterial pole compared to the situation in Tbx1‐/‐ or the majority of Tbx3‐/‐ hearts (Supplementary Material, Figure S6A‐D). The observation that Tbx2 and Tbx3 are co‐operatively required for Hh, FGF and BMP ligand expression, key regulators of cardiac progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation, led us to investigate the extent to which these signaling pathways were altered in Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos compared to wildtype, Tbx1‐/‐ and Tbx3‐/‐ embryos. Using in situ hybridization on transverse sections, Shh expression was found to be expressed at a lower level in ventral pharyngeal endoderm of Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ (Figure 5C) compared to Tbx1‐/‐ (Figure 5B) and Tbx3‐/‐ embryos (Figure 3, Shh). Fgf8 expression was reduced in lateral pharyngeal endoderm of Tbx1‐/‐ embryos at E9.5, as
-
129
previously documented (Figure 5E, arrow) 28. In contrast, in Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ compound mutants, Fgf8 transcript accumulation was elevated in the SHF and OFT (Figure 5F, arrowhead). Consistent with elevated ventral and loss of lateral Fgf8 expression, increased p‐ERK was observed in pharyngeal mesoderm underlying the pharynx and in the distal OFT of Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos (Figure 5M, white arrow), compared to wildtype and Tbx1‐/‐ embryos (Figure 5K, L). Bmp4 expression was unchanged in Tbx1‐/‐ embryos (compare Figure 5G with 5H), but decreased transcript levels were observed in the distal OFT and SHF of Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos (Figure 5I). Consistent with altered Bmp4 expression, reduced P‐Smad labeling was observed in the distal OFT of Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ (Figure 5Q, white arrow) compared to wildtype and Tbx1‐/‐ embryos (Figure 5O, P).
Figure 5. Altered signaling pathway components in Tbx1;Tbx3 composite mutant embryos. In situ hybridization showing that endodermal Shh expression was reduced in E9.5 Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ compared to wildtype and Tbx1‐/‐
embryos (A‐C, arrowhead). Fgf8 expression was reduced in lateral endoderm of Tbx1‐/‐ (E, black arrows) and Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ (F, black arrows) embryos and elevated in ventral pharyngeal mesoderm of Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐
embryos (F, arrowhead). Bmp4 transcript detection was decreased in the distal OFT (I, arrowhead) of Tbx1‐/‐
;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos. Immunofluorescence of wildtype P‐Erk (J) and P‐Smad (N) staining with higher magnifications in wildtype (K, O), Tbx1‐/‐ (L, P) and Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos (M, Q) of the boxed regions in J and N. P‐Erk was increased (M, white arrow) and P‐Smad was reduced (Q, white arrow) compared to the situation in atrial endocardium (Q, yellow arrow) in the distal OFT of Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos. ph, pharynx; l‐end, lateral pharyngeal endoderm; lv, left ventricle; oft, outflow tract; v‐end, ventral pharyngeal endoderm; se, surface ectoderm. Scale bar in Panels A, J, N is 100 μm and in Panels K‐M, O‐Q 25 μm.
-
130
It has been shown that Tbx1 deficiency affects proliferation and differentiation of cardiac progenitor cells 17. Our results demonstrate that combinatorial loss of regulators of proliferation and differentiation of cardiac precursors in Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx2‐/‐ and Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos results in a severe failure of heart tube elongation. These changes are similar to those observed in Tbx2‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos. Together these data uncover impaired intercellular signaling in cardiac precursors and surrounding tissues in composite Tbx1/Tbx2/Tbx3 mutant embryos during OFT formation and pharyngeal development, structures contributing to the pathogenesis of 22q11.2DS.
Discussion
Tbx1, Tbx2, and Tbx3 constitute a T‐box regulatory network that controls OFT and pharyngeal development
Variability in clinical features between 22q11.2DS patients suggests that disruptions of multiple genes or pathways are likely to contribute to the cardiopharyngeal phenotypes found in 22q11.2DS. The 22q11.2DS gene Tbx1 is an important regulator of pharyngeal and OFT development, as Tbx1 deficiency affects SHF proliferation and differentiation leading to hypoplasia of the distal OFT and a common ventricular outlet, as well as patterning defects of the pharyngeal apparatus 11‐13. As T‐box factors comprise a family of related proteins that recognize a similar DNA binding site and interact with the common co‐factors 40, mutations in other T‐box factor genes may contribute to phenotypic variability. Loss of function mouse models of two other T‐box transcription factors, Tbx2 and Tbx3, revealed important roles during arterial pole development. Tbx2 and Tbx3 are closely related transcriptional repressors and are required for proper deployment of SHF cells and ventriculoarterial alignment 22‐24, 41. Tbx2 and Tbx3 are thus excellent candidate modifier genes of the cardiopharyngeal phenotypes resulting from Tbx1 disruption.
Our study indicates that Tbx1, Tbx2, and Tbx3 constitute a T‐box regulatory network that controls OFT and pharyngeal development. Firstly, Tbx1 is required for the expression of Tbx2 and Tbx3 in pharyngeal and NC‐derived mesenchyme. As Tbx1 is not expressed in NC cells the effect on Tbx2 and Tbx3 in this cell type is likely to be indirect, mediated by altered intercellular signaling between Tbx1 expressing mesoderm or pharyngeal epithelia and NC cells. Tbx2 and Tbx3 are also potential direct targets of Tbx1, as these genes are co‐expressed in pharyngeal mesoderm, including SHF cells in the dorsal pericardial wall. Ongoing analysis of Tbx2 and Tbx3 cis‐regulatory elements will provide insight into the Tbx1 dependent signaling pathways, and potential direct role of Tbx1 in pharyngeal mesoderm, in the transcriptional regulation of these genes.
Secondly, we demonstrate that Tbx2 and Tbx3 are co‐expressed in multiple cell populations and that loss of function of both Tbx2 and Tbx3 causes overall growth impairment, disturbed patterning of endodermal pouches (Figure 3) and hypoplasia of the OFT and right ventricle suggesting defective SHF deployment. Tbx2 and Tbx3 overlap in function to pattern pharyngeal endoderm, since Tbx1 expression was observed in ventral pharyngeal endoderm of Tbx2‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos. This localized up‐regulation of Tbx1 in the
-
131
ventral endoderm of Tbx2;Tbx3 compound mutants, coinciding with the site where Tbx2 and Tbx3 are normally co‐expressed, suggests that Tbx2 and Tbx3 directly suppress Tbx1 in this domain of the foregut. However, putative T‐box binding sites regulating Tbx1 expression have not yet been identified. In addition, downregulation of Shh expression was observed in ventral pharyngeal endoderm where Tbx2 and Tbx3 are co‐expressed. Hh‐signaling is required during SHF proliferation and migration and, together with downregulation of Bmp4 and upregulation of Fgf8 in the SHF and distal outflow tract, potentially underlies perturbed SHF deployment in Tbx2;Tbx3 compound mutants.
Thirdly, we provide evidence for the functional importance of a cross‐regulating Tbx1/Tbx2/Tbx3 network, as embryos lacking Tbx1/Tbx2 or Tbx1/Tbx3 present similar severe pharyngeal and heart tube elongation phenotypes, suggesting overlapping roles for Tbx2 and Tbx3 in conferring network robustness. This phenotype is characterized by a C‐looped heart tube that fails to close dorsally, cardiac dilation and OFT obstruction and pericardial edema, associated with reduced addition of SHF derived progenitor cells to the arterial pole of the heart as revealed by Tbx5 and Isl1 expression. This severe phenotype is associated with overall growth impairment and developmental delay, potentially resulting from the cardiac defects. These results demonstrate that the Tbx1/Tbx2/Tbx3 network identified here is robust, requiring loss of function of two of the three components for network collapse and a severe phenotype to emerge. Tbx1 and Tbx2 are co‐localized in a broader domain of the SHF than Tbx1 and Tbx3 potentially explaining the low numbers of Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx2‐/‐ embryos recovered at E9.5. Moreover, downregulation of Tbx2 and Tbx3 in Tbx1‐deficient endoderm and splanchnic mesoderm could further disrupt SHF development in Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx2‐/‐ and Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos.
Disruption of SHF signaling in compound T‐box factor mutants
Recent work has defined the importance of intercellular signals in controlling SHF deployment during heart tube elongation, including FGF, BMP, Shh, Notch, retinoic acid and Wnt signaling pathways 5, 6. In particular, the balance between FGF signaling, predominant in the lateral pharynx where it promotes progenitor cell proliferation, and BMP signaling, predominant in the ventral pharynx and distal OFT where it drives myocardial differentiation, has emerged as a central axis controlling progressive addition of SHF cells to the OFT. Antagonism between these signaling pathways has been dissected revealing that BMP signaling downregulates FGF signaling through BMP target genes in NC cells 7, 42. In addition, BMP regulates microRNA function to silence the SHF progenitor cell genetic program 43. We have investigated the expression of Fgf8 and Bmp4, thought to be the major ligands mediating this signal exchange during OFT morphogenesis in the mouse, and p‐Erk and P‐Smad, intracellular readouts of FGF and BMP signaling, in embryos lacking combinations of Tbx1/Tbx2/Tbx3. Our results reveal that in compound mutant embryos, but not in single mutant embryos, combinatorial defects are observed such that proximal to the elongating heart tube FGF signaling is elevated and BMP signaling downregulated (Figure 6). The topography of signaling events in the caudal pharynx of compound mutant embryos is thus altered and is likely to contribute significantly to generating the observed phenotypes.
-
132
Alterations in FGF and BMP signaling pathways in Tbx2‐/‐;Tbx3+/‐ and Tbx2+/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ embryos indicate that more than one functional allele of either Tbx2 or Tbx3 is required to correctly regulate these signaling pathway components. The elevated Fgf8 expression in pharyngeal mesoderm of Tbx1/Tbx2/Tbx3 compound mutants potentially results from disrupted BMP signaling and decreased antagonism between these pathways (Figure 6). BMP signaling is likely to be tightly regulated during normal OFT development, because expanded BMP signaling in Nkx2.5 mutant embryos also leads to failure of heart tube extension 38.
A small percentage of Tbx3‐/‐ embryos display a severe phenotype on a mixed Bl6/CD1 genetic background (Table 1)23, affecting endodermal Hh‐signaling and the expression of Bmp4 and Fgf8 in the SHF and distal OFT, similar to that the expression changes observed in Tbx2‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐, Tbx2+/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ and Tbx2‐/‐;Tbx3+/‐ embryos on a FVB/N background. Tbx1/Tbx2/Tbx3 is thus likely to be part of a larger network comprising other genetic factors that differ between different genetic backgrounds. Furthermore, downregulation of the BMP target genes Msx1 and Msx2 is observed in the pharyngeal region of severely affected Tbx3 mutant embryos, supporting a role for this gene in the regulation of BMP signaling during pharyngeal development (Supplementary Material, Figure S6F, H).
Figure 6. Altered FGF and BMP signaling in Tbx1/Tbx2/Tbx3 composite mutant embryos. Cartoons showing the distribution of Tbx1, Tbx2 and Tbx3 and the topography of BMP and FGF signaling in pharyngeal mesenchyme (comprised of mesodermal cells, dark grey, and neural crest‐derived cells, light grey), pharyngeal endoderm, dorsal pericardial wall and the outflow tract of wildtype (A), Tbx1‐/‐ (C) and compound mutant embryos (D, E). (B) Schematic summary of FGF‐BMP signaling axis regulation by Tbx1 and by the redundant action of Tbx2/Tbx3 during pharyngeal and arterial pole morphogenesis. Red arrow in C, reduced expression of Tbx2 and Tbx3; green arrow in D, elevated expression of Tbx1. See text for details.
TBX2 and TBX3 are candidate modifier genes of the cardiopharyngeal phenotypes in TBX1 haploinsufficient 22q11.2DS patients
Tbx1 regulates proliferation and differentiation of cardiac progenitor cells in the SHF, and our data demonstrate that Tbx2/Tbx3 function redundantly to assist in coordinating these crucial developmental processes. While the detailed mechanisms linking Tbx1/Tbx2/Tbx3 function to the regulation of this signaling axis remain to be dissected, our study has shown that in the absence of two components the Tbx1/Tbx2/Tbx3 regulatory network collapses,
-
133
severely compromising crucial intercellular Hh, BMP and FGF signaling events during arterial pole morphogenesis (Figure 6). Interestingly, recent work has shown that DNA variations in TBX1 are unable to fully explain the variable cardiovascular phenotypes in 22q11DS patients, highlighting the importance of genetic modifiers of the 22q11DS phenotype 44. Using mouse models, genetic interactions have already been identified between Tbx1 and the genes Crkl, Fgf8, Pitx2, Gbx2, Chd7, Six1/Eya1 and Hes1 29, 45‐47. Here, we show that Tbx2 and Tbx3 can be added to this list. Our findings provide new insights into the mechanisms by which polygenic mutations compromise the robustness of cardiac morphogenesis and lead to CVMs. In conclusion, this work highlights the central roles of Tbx1/Tbx2/Tbx3 in conotruncal morphogenesis and identifies TBX2 and TBX3 as potential candidate modifier genes of the cardiopharyngeal phenotypes in TBX1 haploinsufficient 22q11.2DS patients.
Acknowledgements We thank Jaco Hagoort for his help preparing the interactive 3D‐PDF file and Edouard Saint‐Michel and Laure Lo‐Ré for technical assistance.
FUNDING This work was supported by the European Commission under the FP7 Integrated Project CardioGeNet (HEALTH‐2007‐B‐223463), the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (Vidi grant 864.05.006 to V.M.C. and Mosaic grant 017.004.040 to M.S.R.) and the Fondation pour la Récherche Médicale and Agence National pour la Recherche (to R.G.K.).
Table 1. Phenotypic severity of embryos resulting from Tbx2+/‐;Tbx3+/‐, Tbx1+/‐;Tbx2+/‐ or Tbx1+/‐;Tbx3+/‐
intercrosses.
Phenotypic severity c
Genotype N (obs) a N (exp) b 1 2 3 4 5
Tbx2+/+;Tbx3+/+ 10 9.4 10 0 0 0 0
Tbx2+/‐;Tbx3+/+ 20 18.8 20 0 0 0 0
Tbx2‐/‐;Tbx3+/+ 7 9.4 6 0 1 0 0
Tbx2+/+;Tbx3+/‐ 20 18.8 20 0 0 0 0
Tbx2+/‐;Tbx3+/‐ 34 37.5 34 0 0 0 0
Tbx2‐/‐;Tbx3+/‐ 21 18.8 0 0 0 19 2
Tbx2+/+;Tbx3‐/‐ 12 9.4 10 0 2 0 0
Tbx2+/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ 15 18.8 0 0 0 10 5
Tbx2‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ 11 9.4 0 0 0 0 11
Total 150 100 0 3 27 20
-
134
Tbx1+/+;Tbx2+/+ 10 8.4 10 0 0 0 0
Tbx1+/‐;Tbx2+/+ 24 17 24 0 0 0 0
Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx2+/+ 7 8.4 0 7 0 0 0
Tbx1+/+;Tbx2+/‐ 16 17 16 0 0 0 0
Tbx1+/‐;Tbx2+/‐ 36 34 36 0 0 0 0
Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx2+/‐ 13 17 0 13 0 0 0
Tbx1+/+;Tbx2‐/‐ 7 8.4 6 0 1 0 0
Tbx1+/‐;Tbx2‐/‐ 17 17 15 0 2 0 0
Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx2‐/‐ 4d 8.4 0 0 0 0 4
Total 134 107 20 3 0 4
Tbx1+/+;Tbx3+/+ 13 9.75 13 0 0 0 0
Tbx1+/‐;Tbx3+/+ 17 19.5 16 1 0 0 0
Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx3+/+ 7 9.75 0 7 0 0 0
Tbx1+/+;Tbx3+/‐ 19 19.5 17 1 1 0 0
Tbx1+/‐;Tbx3+/‐ 34 39 29 0 5 0 0
Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx3+/‐ 26 19.5 0 23 3 0 0
Tbx1+/+;Tbx3‐/‐ 12 9.75 2 0 8 1 1
Tbx1+/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ 16 19.5 2 0 12 1 1
Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ 12 9.75 0 1 2 1 8
Total 156 62 65 15 4 10
a Number of embryos collected of each genotype between E9.0 and E10.5
b Number of embryos expected of each genotype
c Phenotypic severity was determined according to the following criteria:
1: wildtype configuration (example panel 3A)
2: arches 2‐6 absent, distal outflow tract hypoplastic (example panel 4B)
3: right ventricle and outflow tract hypoplastic (example panel 3G)
4: pharyngeal hypoplasia and severe right ventricular and outflow tract hypoplasia (example panel 3D)
5: C‐looped dilated heart tube, edema, pharyngeal hypoplasia (including arch 1) (example panel 4D)
d Of which 3 embryos were necrotic
-
135
SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES
Supplemental Figure S1. 3D‐reconstruction of Tbx1, Tbx2 and Tbx3 transcript distrubution in wildtype E9.5 embryos. Expression patterns of Tbx1/Tbx2, Tbx1/Tbx3 and Tbx2/Tbx3 in different embryos were determined using in situ hybridization and subsequently used to generate 3D reconstructions of these combinations (Supplementary Material, 3D‐PDF file).
Supplemental Figure S2. Tbx3 expression in the caudal pharynx is affected by loss of Tbx1. In E9.5 Tbx1 null embryos, Tbx3 expression was found to be reduced in pharyngeal mesenchyme (red arrows in B), in the dorsal pericardial wall (black arrows in B) but not in ventral endoderm (arrowhead in B). 3D‐reconstructions of the dorsal pericardial wall showed a smaller overlapping region of Tbx1/Tbx3 (compare orange region in D with C) in Tbx1‐/‐ embryos. dpw, dorsal pericardial wall; la, left atrium; ph, pharynx; ra, right atrium.
-
136
Supplemental Figure S3. Transcript distribution of Mlc2a, Isl1, Fgf8 and Tbx1 in Tbx2; Tbx3 compound mutants. A shortened outflow tract and right ventricular hypoplasia was observed in compound mutants (C) compared to wildtypes (A). Isl1 was relatively unaffected in the dorsal pericardial wall and outflow tract (D). Sagittal section of an E9.5 wildtype embryo (E, E’), illustrating the plane of the sections in F‐I. In Tbx2‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ mutants, Fgf8 was upregulated in the dorsal pericardial wall (K, arrowhead), and Tbx1 was upregulated in ventral endoderm (L, arrow). dpw, dorsal pericardial wall; la, left atrium; oft, outflow tract; ph, pharynx; V‐end, ventral endoderm.
Supplemental Figure S4. Heterozygosity for Tbx3 does not modify the frequency or severity of the Tbx1+/‐ fourth pharyngeal arch artery (PAA) phenotype. Ink injection at E10.5 showing the right 3rd, 4th and 6th PAAs of a wildtype embryo (A) and absence of the right 4th PAA in Tbx1+/‐ (B) and Tbx1+/‐;Tbx3+/‐ (C) embryos. (D) Bar graph showing the incidence of unilateral (hypoplastic or absent) and bilateral (hypoplastic, hypoplastic/absent and absent) 4th PAA defects for wildtype, Tbx3+/‐, Tbx1+/‐ and Tbx1+/‐;Tbx3+/‐ genotypes. Examples of retro‐oesophageal right subclavian artery in Tbx1+/‐ (E, arrow) and Tbx1+/‐;Tbx3+/‐ (F, arrow) embryos at E14.5. da, descending aorta.
-
137
Supplemental Figure S5. 3D‐reconstructions of pharyngeal endoderm in wildtype, Tbx1‐/‐, and Tbx1+/‐;Tbx2‐/‐
E9.5 embryos. Proper segmentation and expansion of the foregut is severely affected in Tbx1‐/‐ embryos, but also affected in Tbx1+/‐;Tbx2‐/‐ embryos.
Supplemental Figure S6. Expression of Isl1 in Tbx1;Tbx3 compound nulls and of Msx1 and Msx2 in Tbx3‐deficient embryos. Expression analysis of Isl1 revealed no differences in Tbx1‐/‐ and Tbx3‐/‐ single mutant embryos but a reduced contribution to the Tbx1‐/‐;Tbx3‐/‐ compound mutant outflow tract. BMP target genes Msx1 and Msx2 were downregulated in severely affected Tbx3‐/‐ embryos. dpw, dorsal pericardial wall; lv, left ventricle; oft, outflow tract; pa1, pharyngeal arch; ph, pharynx.
References
(1) Wilson DI, Burn J, Scambler P, Goodship J. DiGeorge syndrome: part of CATCH 22. JMG 1993 October;30(10):852‐6.
(2) Hoffman JI, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002 June 19;39(12):1890‐900.
(3) Pierpont ME, Basson CT, Benson DW, Jr. et al. Genetic basis for congenital heart defects: current knowledge: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Congenital Cardiac Defects Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young: endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Circulation 2007 June 12;115(23):3015‐38.
-
138
(4) Buckingham M, Meilhac S, Zaffran S. Building the mammalian heart from two sources of myocardial cells. Nat Rev Genet 2005 November;6(11):826‐37.
(5) Dyer LA, Kirby ML. Sonic hedgehog maintains proliferation in secondary heart field progenitors and is required for normal arterial pole formation. Dev Biol 2009 June 15;330(2):305‐17.
(6) Rochais F, Mesbah K, Kelly RG. Signaling pathways controlling second heart field development. Circ Res 2009 April 24;104(8):933‐42.
(7) Tirosh‐Finkel L, Zeisel A, Brodt‐Ivenshitz M et al. BMP‐mediated inhibition of FGF signaling promotes cardiomyocyte differentiation of anterior heart field progenitors. Dev 2010 September;137(18):2989‐3000.
(8) Stankunas K, Shang C, Twu KY et al. Pbx/Meis deficiencies demonstrate multigenetic origins of congenital heart disease. Circ Res 2008 September 26;103(7):702‐9.
(9) Hoogaars WMH, Barnett P, Moorman AFM, Christoffels VM. T‐box factors determine cardiac design. Cell Mol Life Sci 2007;64:646‐60.
(10) Scambler PJ. The 22q11 deletion syndromes. Hum Mol Genet 2000 October;9(16):2421‐6.
(11) Jerome LA, Papaioannou VE. DiGeorge syndrome phenotype in mice mutant for the T‐box gene, Tbx1. Nat Genet 2001 March;27(3):286‐91.
(12) Lindsay EA, Vitelli F, Su H et al. Tbx1 haploinsufficieny in the DiGeorge syndrome region causes aortic arch defects in mice. Nature 2001 March 1;410(6824):97‐101.
(13) Merscher S, Funke B, Epstein JA et al. TBX1 is responsible for cardiovascular defects in velo‐cardio‐facial/DiGeorge syndrome. Cell 2001 February 23;104(4):619‐29.
(14) Xu H, Morishima M, Wylie JN et al. Tbx1 has a dual role in the morphogenesis of the cardiac outflow tract. Dev 2004 July;131(13):3217‐27.
(15) Kelly RG, Brown NA, Buckingham ME. The arterial pole of the mouse heart forms from Fgf10‐expressing cells in pharyngeal mesoderm. Dev Cell 2001;1:435‐40.
(16) Liao J, Aggarwal VS, Nowotschin S, Bondarev A, Lipner S, Morrow BE. Identification of downstream genetic pathways of Tbx1 in the second heart field. Dev Biol 2008 April 15;316(2):524‐37.
(17) Chen L, Fulcoli FG, Tang S, Baldini A. Tbx1 regulates proliferation and differentiation of multipotent heart progenitors. Circ Res 2009 October 23;105(9):842‐51.
(18) Vitelli F, Taddei I, Morishima M, Meyers EN, Lindsay EA, Baldini A. A genetic link between Tbx1 and fibroblast growth factor signaling. Dev 2002 October;129(19):4605‐11.
(19) Vitelli F, Lania G, Huynh T, Baldini A. Partial rescue of the Tbx1 mutant heart phenotype by Fgf8: genetic evidence of impaired tissue response to Fgf8. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2010 November;49(5):836‐40.
(20) Bamshad M, Lin RC, Law DJ et al. Mutations in human TBX3 alter limb, apocrine and genital development in ulnar‐mammary syndrome. Nat Genet 1997 July;16(3):311‐5.
(21) Christoffels VM, Smits GJ, Kispert A, Moorman AF. Development of the pacemaker tissues of the heart. Circ Res 2010 February 5;106(2):240‐54.
(22) Bakker ML, Boukens BJ, Mommersteeg MTM et al. Transcription factor Tbx3 is required for the specification of the atrioventricular conduction system. Circ Res 2008;102:1340‐9.
(23) Mesbah K, Harrelson Z, Theveniau‐Ruissy M, Papaioannou VE, Kelly RG. Tbx3 is required for outflow tract development. Circ Res 2008 September 26;103(7):743‐50.
-
139
(24) Harrelson Z, Kelly RG, Goldin SN et al. Tbx2 is essential for patterning the atrioventricular canal and for morphogenesis of the outflow tract during heart development. Dev 2004 October;131(20):5041‐52.
(25) Aanhaanen WT, Brons JF, Dominguez JN et al. The Tbx2+ primary myocardium of the atrioventricular canal forms the atrioventricular node and the base of the left ventricle. Circ Res 2009 May 7;104(11):1267.
(26) Theveniau‐Ruissy M, Dandonneau M, Mesbah K et al. The del22q11.2 candidate gene Tbx1 controls regional outflow tract identity and coronary artery patterning. Circ Res 2008 July 18;103(2):142‐8.
(27) Kelly RG, Jerome‐Majewska LA, Papaioannou VE. The del22q11.2 candidate gene Tbx1 regulates branchiomeric myogenesis. Hum Mol Genet 2004 November 15;13(22):2829‐40.
(28) Vitelli F, Morishima M, Taddei I, Lindsay EA, Baldini A. Tbx1 mutation causes multiple cardiovascular defects and disrupts neural crest and cranial nerve migratory pathways. Hum Mol Genet 2002 April 15;11(8):915‐22.
(29) Calmont A, Ivins S, Van Bueren KL et al. Tbx1 controls cardiac neural crest cell migration during arch artery development by regulating Gbx2 expression in the pharyngeal ectoderm. Dev 2009 September;136(18):3173‐83.
(30) Zirzow S, Ludtke TH, Brons JF, Petry M, Christoffels VM, Kispert A. Expression and requirement of T‐box transcription factors Tbx2 and Tbx3 during secondary palate development in the mouse. Dev Biol 2009 December 15;336(2):145‐55.
(31) Goddeeris MM, Schwartz R, Klingensmith J, Meyers EN. Independent requirements for Hedgehog signaling by both the anterior heart field and neural crest cells for outflow tract development. Dev 2007 April;134(8):1593‐604.
(32) Garg V, Yamagishi C, Hu T, Kathiriya IS, Yamagishi H, Srivastava D. Tbx1, a DiGeorge syndrome candidate gene, is regulated by sonic hedgehog during pharyngeal arch development. Dev Biol 2001 July 1;235(1):62‐73.
(33) Yamagishi H, Maeda J, Hu T et al. Tbx1 is regulated by tissue‐specific forkhead proteins through a common Sonic hedgehog‐responsive enhancer. Genes Dev 2003 January 15;17(2):269‐81.
(34) Vitelli F, Zhang Z, Huynh T, Sobotka A, Mupo A, Baldini A. Fgf8 expression in the Tbx1 domain causes skeletal abnormalities and modifies the aortic arch but not the outflow tract phenotype of Tbx1 mutants. Dev Biol 2006 April 4.
(35) Aggarwal VS, Morrow BE. Genetic modifiers of the physical malformations in velo‐cardio‐facial syndrome/DiGeorge syndrome. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2008;14(1):19‐25.
(36) Crossley PH, Martin GR. The mouse Fgf8 gene encodes a family of polypeptides and is expressed in regions that direct outgrowth and patterning in the developing embryo. Dev 1995 February;121(2):439‐51.
(37) Ilagan R, bu‐Issa R, Brown D et al. Fgf8 is required for anterior heart field development. Dev 2006 June;133(12):2435‐45.
(38) Prall OWJ, Menon MK, Solloway MJ et al. An Nkx2‐5/Bmp2/Smad1 negative feedback loop controls heart progenitor specification and proliferation. Cell 2007 March 9;128(5):947‐59.
(39) Peterkin T, Gibson A, Patient R. GATA‐6 maintains BMP‐4 and Nkx2 expression during cardiomyocyte precursor maturation. EMBO J 2003 August 15;22(16):4260‐73.
(40) Naiche LA, Harrelson Z, Kelly RG, Papaioannou VE. T‐Box Genes in Vertebrate Development. Annu Rev Genet 2005 July 5;39:219‐39.
(41) Dupays L, Kotecha S, Mohun TJ. Tbx2 misexpression impairs deployment of second heart field derived progenitor cells to the arterial pole of the embryonic heart. Dev Biol 2009 June 26;333(1):121‐31.
(42) Kirby ML, Hutson MR. Factors controlling cardiac neural crest cell migration. Cell Adh Migr 2010 October 1;4(4).
-
140
(43) Wang J, Greene SB, Bonilla‐Claudio M et al. Bmp signaling regulates myocardial differentiation from cardiac progenitors through a MicroRNA‐mediated mechanism. Dev Cell 2010 December 14;19(6):903‐12.
(44) Guo T, McGinn DM, Blonska A et al. Genotype and Cardiovascular Phenotype Correlations with TBX1 in 1,022 Velo‐Cardio‐Facial/DiGeorge/22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome Patients. Hum Mutat 2011 July 27.
(45) Nowotschin S, Liao J, Gage PJ, Epstein JA, Campione M, Morrow BE. Tbx1 affects asymmetric cardiac morphogenesis by regulating Pitx2 in the secondary heart field. Dev 2006 April;133(8):1565‐73.
(46) Guris DL, Duester G, Papaioannou VE, Imamoto A. Dose‐dependent interaction of Tbx1 and Crkl and locally aberrant RA signaling in a model of del22q11 syndrome. Dev Cell 2006 January;10(1):81‐92.
(47) Randall V, McCue K, Roberts C et al. Great vessel development requires biallelic expression of Chd7 and Tbx1 in pharyngeal ectoderm in mice. J Clin Invest 2009 November;119(11):3301‐10.
(48) Wakker V, Brons JF, Aanhaanen WT, van Roon MA, Moorman AF, Christoffels VM. Generation of mice with a conditional null allele for Tbx2. Genesis 2010 January 21.
(49) Davenport TG, Jerome‐Majewska LA, Papaioannou VE. Mammary gland, limb and yolk sac defects in mice lacking Tbx3, the gene mutated in human ulnar mammary syndrome. Dev 2003 May;130(10):2263‐73.
(50) Hoogaars WMH, Tessari A, Moorman AFM et al. The transcriptional repressor Tbx3 delineates the developing central conduction system of the heart. Cardiovasc Res 2004 June 1;62:489‐99.
(51) Moorman AFM, Houweling AC, de Boer PAJ, Christoffels VM. Sensitive nonradioactive detection of mRNA in tissue sections: novel application of the whole‐mount in situ hybridization protocol. J Histochem Cytochem 2001;49:1‐8.
(52) Chapman DL, Garvey N, Hancock S et al. Expression of the T‐box family genes, Tbx1‐Tbx5, during early mouse development. Dev Dyn 1996;206:379‐90.
(53) Kelly RG, Papaioannou VE. Visualization of outflow tract development in the absence of Tbx1 using an FgF10 enhancer trap transgene. Dev Dyn 2007 March;236(3):821‐8.
(54) Soufan AT, van den Berg G, Moerland PD et al. Three‐dimensional measurement and visualization of morphogenesis applied to cardiac embryology. J Microsc 2007;225:269‐74.