Download - Tilt Up Design
1
1C O N C R E T E D E S I G N H A N D B O O K • T H I R D E D I T I O N
Chapter 13Tilt-Up Concrete Wall Panels
By Gerry Weiler
April 2006
2C O N C R E T E D E S I G N H A N D B O O K • T H I R D E D I T I O N
Effect of Recent Code Changeson Tilt-up Construction
3
CSA A23.3-04 - Design ofConcrete Structures
• Includes changes affecting Tilt-up Construction
• Minor revisions to Chapter 23, Tilt-up Wall Panels
• Comprehensive changes to Chapter 21, Special Provisions for Seismic Design
• Significant effect on seismic requirements for tilt-up and other low rise buildings
2
4
CSA A23.3-04 - Chapter 23,Tilt-up Wall Panels
• Provides a simplified method for analysis and design of slender concrete walls
• Based on flexural tension yielding of the longitudinal reinforcement
P e
P ∆
P e ∆
DeflectedShape
+
PanelLoading
PrimaryMoment
SecondaryMoment
CombinedMoment
W =
5
CSA A23.3-04 Chapter 23Tilt-up Wall Panels
• Covers only the basic aspects of tilt-up panel design
• Limited to vertical and out-of-plane lateral forces
• Design for in-plane shear forces not included in this chapter
• Chapter 13 of the handbook provides additional guidelines for the application of A23.3
6
Moment Magnifier MethodBasic equations:
Mmax = Mb + Pf ∆max
Mb = applied factored moment
Pf = factored axial load 5 l 2 Mmax∆max = –– –––––––48 Ec Icr
Mmax 48 Ec Icr–––– = ––––––– = Kbf∆max 5 l 2
Kbf = bending stiffness
3
7
Moment Magnifier MethodPf Mmax
Mmax = Mb + ––––––Kbf
Rearranging:⎧ 1 ⎫
Mmax = Mb ⎨–––––––– ⎬ = Mb δb⎩ 1- Pf / Kbf⎭
1 δb = ––––––––
1 - Pf / Kbf
= moment magnification factor
Gives identical results to iteration method
8
Bending Stiffness• Bending stiffness, Kb is the maximum
moment divided by maximum deflection• It will vary, depending on support conditions,
type of loading and properties of the cross section
• For pure axial load it is the same as the Euler buckling load:
π2 E I 9.87 E IKbf = Pcr = –––––– = ––––––
l 2 l 2
• For tilt-up panels the following is more representative:
48 E I 9.6 E IKbf = –––––– = ––––––
5 l 2 l 2
9
Member Resistance Factor• Member resistance factor, φm is used to
reduce the calculated bending stiffness:⎧ 1 ⎫
Mmax = Mb ⎨ –––––––––– ⎬ = Mb δb⎩ 1- P /φm Kbf ⎭
φm = 0.75• φm has been increased from 0.65 to 0.75 and is
now consistent with CSA A23.3, Chapter 10 and ACI 318-2002
• P-delta deflections decreased• Designs will be slightly less conservative
4
10
Area of Reinforcement Modification (23.3.1.5)
φs As fy + PfAs eff = ––––––––––– (23-4)φs fy
• Simulates increased strength due to axial load on the cross section
• Not specifically permitted for increasing bending stiffness in CSA A23.3-04
• More conservative than ACI and UBC codes where stiffness modification is permitted
11
Clause 23.3.1.2Provides limit on axial compression
Pwf + Ptf–––––––– < 0.09 φc f´cAg
• Assumptions for bending stiffness and P-delta effects not valid with large axial loads
• Axial loads on most tilt-up panels are small• Sometimes affects panels with large openings
and narrow legs
12
Panel Height to Thickness Limitations (23.2.3)
Max l / tSingle mat of reinforcement 50(centered in panel)2 mats of reinforcement 65(25mm clear to each face)
• Primarily intended as practical limits• Panel thickness my be controlled by
service load deflections• Reduce the above limits by half for
cantilevers
5
13
Maximum UnsupportedPanel Height
Panel ReinforcementThickness Single mat Double mat
140 mm 7.0 m 9.1 m160 mm 8.0 m 10.4 m190 mm 9.5 m 12.4 m260 mm 13.0 m 16.9 m
14
New Clause 23.2.10“Where vertical reinforcement is placed in two layers, the effect of compression reinforcement shall be ignored”
Reasons:• Assumptions for bending stiffness and
P-delta effects are not valid with compression reinforcement
• Reinforcement on the compression side of thin concrete cross sections in a tilt-up panel will often be in tension at ultimate loads
15
New Clause 23.3.2 ServiceLoad Deflection Limitations
• Provisions expanded and now similar in format to strength calculations
• Stiffness reduction factor, φm not included in deflection calculations
span• Service load limit of –––– is unchanged
100• Panel deflections are rarely problematic• Recent studies suggest that the CSA / ACI
methods for deflection of thin concrete members may be non-conservative
6
16
Creep and Initial Deflections• The design should allow for initial deflections
due to warping or uneven casting beds• Differential shrinkage and thermal gradients
may also be a factor• Long term creep has not been a significant
problem because axial loads are usually small
• Clause 23.3.1.4 requires a minimum initial deflection ∆0 = l / 400
17
Loading Conditions on Tilt-up PanelsChanges in NBCC 2005 for “Principal Loads”
and “Companion Loads”Factored Resistance Principal Load Companion Load
1. φR 1.4D2. φR 1.25D + 1.5L + 0.5S or 0.4W3. φR 1.25D + 1.5S + 0.5L or 0.4W4. φR 1.25D + 1.4W + 0.5L or 0.5S5. φR + effect of 0.9D 1.4W or 1.5L or 1.5S6. φR 1.0D + 1.0E + 0.5L or 0.25S7. φR + effect of 1.0D 1.0E
# 4 and 6 usually control for out-of-plane bending# 5 and 7 apply to in-plane shear
18
Lateral Wind Loads on Panels(NBCC 2005, Clause 4.1.7)
p = Iw q Ce (Cp Cg - Cpi Cgi)Iw = 1.0 for normal buildings (ULS)
= 0.75 for serviceability (SLS)q = 1 in 50 reference velocity pressureCp Cg = typically + 1.3 or - 1.5 for tilt-upCpi = + 0.30 or - 0.45 for buildings with
only a few small openingsCgi = internal gust factor fixed at 2.0 (?)Ce = exposure factor ranges from 0.7 to
1.0 for most low rise buildings
7
19
Lateral Wind Loads on Panels
• Effect of new wind load provisions are not a significant change for tilt-up design
• NBCC 2005 load factor reduced to 1.4 for wind• Design wind pressures are typically greater
compared to ASCE requirements• Panels reinforcement for high, simply supported
panels is directly proportional to wind loads
20
Wind Load Design ComparisonPanel Height 30 ftWidth 20 ftThickness 6.25"Self Weight 80 psfReinf 2 layers
d = 4.75" Roof DL = 500 plfRoof LL = 1000 plf
.
21
Wind Loads on Tilt-upWall Panels
• 100 kph (62 mph) was selected for the 1:30 reference wind speed in NBCC 1995. The reference pressure q would be 0.5 kPa (10.4 psf)
• Corresponding 1:50 wind speed for NBCC 2005 is 105 kph (65.2 mph), or q = 0.55 kPa (11.5 psf)
• Equivalent 1:50 wind speed for ASCE 7-02 is 85 mph (137 kph), q = 15.4 psf (0.74 kPa)
8
22
Comparison of Wind LoadsDesign Wind Pressures:
NBCC 1995 NBCC 2005 ASCE 7-02+ve W 21.2 psf 25.5 psf 13.6 psf+ve Wf 31.8 psf 35.7 psf 21.8 psf
------ + 12% - 31 %-ve W 23.0 psf 24.1 psf 15.1 psf-ve Wf 34.5 psf 33.7 psf 24.2 psf
------ - 2% - 30%Total Panel Reinforcement:
A23.3-94 A23.3- 04 ACI 318-021473 lbs 1536 lbs 1100 lbs
Difference ------ + 4% - 25%
23
Lateral Seismic Loads on Panels• Obtained from NBCC 2005, Clause 4.1.8.17• Vp = 0.3 Fa Sa(0.2) IE Sp Wp
Cp Ar AxSp = –––––––– where 0.7 ≤ Sp ≤ 4.0
Rpand
hxAx = 1 + 2 ––
hn
• hx usually be taken as the center of mass of the panel at each storey
• Rp is typically 2.5 for wall panels
24
Lateral Seismic Loads on Panels• Cp is the risk factor equal to 1.0• Ar is usually 1.0, but could be as high as
2.5 for if the fundamental period of the building is similar to that of the panel component
• Large warehouse buildings with tall panels may be affected
• Lateral seismic forces may be similar in magnitude to wind loads and both should be checked
9
25
Axial Loads• Axial (vertical) loads from
roof or floor members • Assume uniform line load
for multiple joists• Apply minimum
eccentricity of ½ panel thickness
• Effect of eccentricity should be additive to lateral load effect
• Do not use wind uplift to reduce axial load
.
.Joist Load
DesignCrossSection
bd
/ 2
/ 2l
l
26
Large Axial Loads• Large axial loads can
sometimes be supported on the panel
• Restrictions on effective panel design width bd
• Check for axial stress in the design widthPwf + Ptf–––––––– < 0.09 φc f´cAg
Beam Load
DesignCrossSection
21
= Design Widthb d
bd
bd
/ 2
/ 2l
l
27
Panel Self WeightR
2 ∆3
W
1
R2
c
Wc
Wcl
∆3
2 Wc ∆R1 = R2 = ––––––3 l
Mid-height moment:R1 l Wc ∆ Wc ∆M = –––– + –––– = ––––2 2x3 2
Wc = panel self weight∴ Panel weight above the
critical section acts as an additional axial load
10
28
Continuity and End Fixity• Panels extending below
floor slab• Effect of lateral soil
pressure below floor slab• Consider the
effectiveness of footing restraint
• Continuous multi storey panels
• Moments may be affected by lateral deflections at flexible supports
PrimaryMoment
P
WM
SecondaryMoment
1 M
M2M2
δ
δ
1
= Moment Magnifierδ
• Additional lateral loads from intermediate floors
29
Continuity and End Fixity• Not specifically covered in CSA A23.3-04• Simplified, but conservative methods are
often used• Assume simple spans with a reduced
effective length k l• k should not be less than 0.9
30
Openings in Panels• Effect of openings
approximated by using vertical design strips
• Gives reasonable accuracy and economy for most designs
• Distribute entire axial and lateral load over the tributary width to the design strips each side of the opening
• Limit design width to 12t
bb
= Design WidthTypicalDesign Strip
t
bd
bt
b
=12 t maxbd
d
= Tributary Widthbt
bd
t = Panel Thickness
=12 t max
=12 t maxbd
11
31
Isolated Footings and Pier Foundations
• Panels support at each end of panel
• Continuous lateral restraint at top (roof) and bottom (floor)
• Design strip bd limited to 12t
• Distribute all vertical loads, including self weight into the design strips.
• Lateral bending resisted by entire panel width
CriticalCrossSection2
1
Joist Load
bd
DesignStrip
32
Stiffening Pilasters• Support large vertical
loads• Provide increased out-
of-plane bending resistance at edges of large openings
• Provide ties at beam bearing points
• Compression ties otherwise not required with axial stresses less than 0.10f´c
Beam supportedon Pilaster
Roof
Floor
Pilasterat edgeof opening
Header BeamOver Opening
Roof
Floor
33
Concentrated Lateral Loads• End reactions from
header beams in wide panels
• Lateral loads from wind or seismic on intermediate floors
• Lateral loads from cranes or other equipment
• Opposing lateral loads from suspended elements such as canopies
R
1
a
2
H
.
R
c
b
1R
R2
W/2
W/2
H
W
W W LoadDiagram
MomentDiagram
Deflection
x
l
12
34
Cantilever Panels• Free standing signs
and screen walls with cast-in-place concrete footings
• Parapets above the roof of a building
• Moment magnifier method can be used but Kb factor is different
l
M
Wc
∆3
∆max
l W2.
∆2
∆ 1
Roof
Floor
l
W 1
1
1
∆3
∆ 2
22Fixedbase
c
W W
2c
c
Panel with Parapet
Cantilever Panel
35
Cantilever Panelswf lc2
Mb = ––––2
Wc ∆ Wc Mf lc2Mf = Mb + –––– = ––– ––––
3 3 4 EIMf lc2 4 EI
∆max = ––––; Kbc = ––––4 EI lc2
Moment magnifier equation:1
–––––––––Mf = Mf δc where δc = Wc1 - ––––––
3 φm Kbc
l
M
Wc
∆3
∆max
Fixedbase
Wc
Cantilever Panel
36
Panels Subjected to In-Plane Shear• Lateral wind or seismic forces resisted by tilt-
up panels around the building perimeter• Sometimes, interior shear walls are required• Concrete shear stresses are usually very small• No specific design guidelines in Chapter 23 of
CSA A23.3-04 for design of tilt-up shear wallsIn- Plane Shear fromRoof or Floor Diaphragm
Panel to SlabConnector
In-Plane Shear Forces
Panel to PanelShear Connector
In- Plane Shear fromRoof or Floor Diaphragm
Panel to SlabConnector
In-Plane Shear Forces
Panel to PanelShear Connector
13
37
In-Plane ShearDesign Considerations:• Panel overturning• Panel sliding• Concrete shear
stress• Axial load stability• Frame action• Seismic ductility
In- Plane Shear fromRoof or Floor Diaphragm
PanelWeight
Panel to PanelShear Force
Resisting Forceat Foundations
In-Plane Shear Forces
Panel Shear
38
Resistance to Panel Overturning• Panel overturning taken
about an outside corner• Point of rotation is usually
near the corner• All applied forces are
factored• Forces and weights resisting
overturning are modified in accordance with NBCC
• Provide connections to adjacent panels or tie down anchors to foundations for increased overturning resistance
b
Vr
Wpanel
Vpanel
Vroof
floor
roof
panel
2nd Floor
Roof
Vfloor
Main Floor
Vr fdn
Main
main
C of G
R
Foundation
Panel Overturning Resistance
ll
l
l
39
Panel Edge Connector(For Seismic Shear Transfer)
• Embedded angle with rebar anchor
• Recess below surface
• Good for seismic ductility
• Resists overstress
SOLID BARWELDED TOEMBED ANGLE
ANGLE WITHREBAR ANCHOR
14
40
Resistance to Sliding
• Friction between the panel and the foundation• Direct bearing of panel to notch in floor slab• Connections to foundations or floor slab• Minimum 2 connections at base of panel is
recommended• Soils resistance to sliding should also be
checked
41
Chapter 21, Special Provisions for Seismic Design
• Past requirements originally intended for monolithic concrete elements
• The unique aspects of tilt-up construction are not specifically addressed
• Seismic forces in tilt-up buildings often resisted by a series of individual wall panel elements
• Solid panels do not have a well defined mechanism for seismic energy dissipation
42
Section 21.7, Moderate Ductility
• Rd = 2.0 and Ro = 1.4 for moderately ductile shear walls
• Rd = 2.5 and Ro = 1.4 for moderately ductile frames
• Requires capacity design principles and a well defined energy absorbing mechanism
• Does not recognize panel rocking as a legitimate seismic energy absorbing system
• Dimensional limitations for solid shear walls are severe and impractical for tilt-up
15
43
Seismic Design for Frame Panels
New Clause 21.7.1.2Tilt-up Wall Panels shall be designed to the requirements of Clause 23 except that the requirements of Clause 21.7.2 (Moderately Ductile Moment Resisting Frames) shall apply to wall panels with openings when the maximum inelastic rotational demand on any part of the panel exceeds 0.02 radians. However, the inelastic rotational demand shall not exceed 0.04 radians.
44
Seismic Design Requirements for Solid Shear Panels
New Clause 21.7.1.2The requirements of Clause 21.7.4 (Squat Shear Walls) shall apply to solid wall panels when the maximum in plane shear stress exceeds
–––vf ≥ vc = 0.1 φc √ f ´c
vc = 0.33 MPa (48 psi) for 30 MPa concrete
45
Clause 21.7.2 - Moderately Ductile Moment Resisting Frames
• Rd = 2.5 and Ro = 1.4• Applies to frame panels, where joint rotational
demand exceeds 0.02 radians ( 1.140 )• Provides a joint rotational limit of 0.04 radians• Difficult to check rotational demand except for
very simple and regular buildings• Analysis of deflections and rotational demand for
buildings with a mixture of stiff and flexible panel elements may be impractical
• Clause 21.8 Conventional Construction will be easier to apply to tilt-up
16
46
Rotational Demand fora Simple Panel
Rotational Demand =
∆
Vf
L
∆ L/
10M Ties
4-20M EF
Left Leg10M Ties
4-20M EF
Right Leg
47
Typical Wall Elevation ofTilt-up Panels
• Most tilt-up warehouses consist of solid panels with high in-plane shear strength and stiffness
• Shear force capacity often limited by panel overturning
48
Typical Elevation ofFrame Panels
• Panel widths, thickness and opening configurations may vary in a wall line
• Panels may also be interrupted or offset within the wall line
• The provisions in Chapter 21 are difficult to apply
17
49
Single Storey Office
50
Panels with Openings
51
Panels with Openings• Large openings are common in tilt-up
office buildings• Panels designed as moment resisting
frames to resist in-plane shear• Plastic hinges may develop at some
interior panel joints• Panel overturning should be checked, but
may not control the design
18
52
Frame Panel
• Panel header beams are often deep compared to width of supporting legs
• Plastic hinging is more likely to occur in the legs rather than the headers.
Roof VF
PlasticHinge
WP
VP
Floor VF
53
Joint in Frame Panel
HookedLongitudinalReinforcement
Continuous Vertical Reinforcement
Closed Hoop Ties
ConcreteSpalling
HeaderStirrups
54
Frame Panel Reinforcement
19
55
Clause 21.7.2 - Moderately Ductile Moment Resisting Frames
• The provisions were modified to reflect changes to NBCC
• Close spacing of ties required to prevent buckling of longitudinal reinforcement
• Tie spacing of 8db or 6.25" (160mm) for 20M longitudinal bars in beams
• Tie spacing in columns is more restrictive6db or h/2 (4” or less)
56
Panel Leg Cross Section
HoopTies
Cross Ties
HoopTies
Section withCross Ties
Section withoutCross Ties
• Axial Stress in vertical legs is usuallysmall and typically less than 0.10 f ’c
• Panel legs can often be detailed without cross ties
57
Warehouse Panel Detailed forIn-Plane Shear Forces
Roof VF
WP
VP
Floor VR
Ties @ 6 o/c at Joint
"
Ties @ 12 o/cBelow Joint
"20M VerticalBars in Legs
2 - 15MHorizontalBars inHeaders
Ties @ 4 o/cabove Joint
’
10M @ 18Ea Face
"72
10M @ 10 Alt Face"
20
58
3 Storey Tilt-Up
59
Solid Panels• Panel overturning should be checked and
often controls the panel design• Edge connections added to resist
overturning• Panel hold down ties to foundations are
rarely used• Energy absorption achieved by
deformation of edge connectors and panels rocking on foundations
60
New Clause 21.7.4Squat Shear Walls
• The wall is required to yield and absorb seismic energy, but the diaphragm must remain elastic
• Allows the designer to opt out by designing the wall and diaphragm for Rd = R0 = 1.0, or about 2.8 times the prescribed earthquake force
21
61
Squat Shear Walls• Can apply to solid tilt-up panels where shear
stresses–––vf ≥ 0.1 φc √ f ’c
• Equivalent to a threshold in-plane shear force of 3400 plf for a 6” tilt-up panel for 4350 psi (30MPa)
• Permits Rd = 2.0 and Ro =1.4• Buildings with a mixture of stiff and flexible
panels may fall into this category• Designers will likely try to avoid this clause by
using “Conventional Construction” withRd = 1.5 and Ro =1.3
62
Connections for Tilt-up Panels
3 major categories:• Cast-in-place concrete infill
sections• Welded embedded metal• Drilled-in anchors
63
Cast-In-Place Concrete In-fill
Exterior grade
HookeddowelFloor slab infillafter panelinstallation
Rebar pinsor weldedconnection
Strip Footing
Panel on Strip Footing
Extend rebarinto pilaster
Cast-in-placepilaster with ties
Chamferon outsideface
Cast-In-Place Pilaster
Extend panelrebar intoconnection
Cast-in-place infill sectionChamfer
on outsideface
Cast-In-Place Panel Infill
22
64
Cast-In-Place ConcreteIn-fill Sections
• Usually very strong and can emulate cast-in-place concrete
• Good seismic ductility• Excessive restraint for concrete
shrinkage• Post construction cracking
65
Welded Embedded Metal
• Good strength and low to moderate ductility
• Adaptable to a variety of applications• Edge distance is sometimes a problem• Preferred by most designers and
builders due a relative cost advantage
66
Welded Embedded Metal
Steel Joist on Angle Seat
EM3embedplate
Edge angleSteel decking
Angle seatfield welded toembed plate
Edge AngleConnection
EM2embedplate
Edge angleSteel decking
Angle tiestrutsSteeljoist
23
67
Welded Embedded Metal
Shear PlateConnection
Steel BeamConnection
Edge angle
EM2embedplate
EM4embedplate
Steelbeam
Bolts withslotted holesShear plate fieldwelded to embedplate
68
Welded Embedded Metal
Exterior grade
Strip footing
Panel on Strip Footing
EM5 in floor slab
Weld to filler barand EM2 in panel
Solid barwelded toembed angle
Embed angle with studs
Panel Edge Connector (not recommended)
Potential crack
EM5 Angle with Rebar Anchor
Solid BarWelded toEmbed Angle
Panel Edge Connector(for seismic shear transfer)
69
StandardizedConnections
V
T20
0
4 6 0
11
3 8 m m
VT
EM5 Edge Connector
20M Gr 400 Rebar Anchor
Vr = 125 kN, Tr = 100 kN
L 38 x 38 x 6 x 200mm
V
T
f
f
f
f
ff
V
Tf
f
EM3 Shear Plate PL 200 x 9.5 x 2004 - 16mm studs
V
Tf
f
EM4 Shear Plate PL 225 x 9.5 x 4608 - 16mm Studs
EM2 Shear Plate PL 150 x 9.5 x 2002 - 16mm studs 100mm 150mm Studs Vr = 65 kN 65 kNTr = 50 kN 95 kN
Studs
100mm 150mm Studs Vr = 110 kN 130 kNTr = 65 kN 130 kN
Studs
100mm 150mm Studs Vr = 170 kN 265 kNTr = 90 kN 200 kN
Studs
Standard Tilt-up Connectors
d = 1 0 0o r 1 5 0 m m
d = 100mm 150mm Vr = 110 kN 110 kNTr = 45 kN 70 kN
EM1 Joist Seat L89 x 89 x 6 x 300mm2 - 15M Gr 400 Rebar Anchors
24
70
Standardized Connections• Developed by an SECBC Committee in
Vancouver• Testing Carried out at UBC by Kevin
Lemieux• Included monotonic and cyclic testing• Includes 5 basic connector types• Decreases cost of fabrication• Provides load capacities for design
71
Panel Edge Connectorin form
72
Panel Edge Connector after Welding
25
73
Drilled-in Anchors• Includes expansion bolts, adhesive
anchors and coil inserts• Limited strength and ductility• Readily available and inexpensive• May be used where other connections
are incorrectly installed• Suitable for light architectural
components
74
Connections for Seismic Forces• Vp = 0.3 Fa Sa(0.2) IE Sp Wp
Cp Ar AxSp = ––––––– where 0.7 ≤ Sp ≤ 4.0
Rpand
hxAx = 1 + 2 ––hn
• hx usually be taken as the center of mass of the component being connected
75
Connections for Seismic Forces
• Cp = 1.0 for ductile connections= 2.0 for non ductile connections
• Ar = 1.0 for rigid elements= 2.5 for flexible elements
• Rp = 1.0 for non ductile connections= 2.5 for ductile connections
• Connection forces are less than previous code due to the limit of 4.0 on the Sp
26
76
Construction Requirements
• Includes recommended panel forming tolerances
• Concrete cover for reinforcement• Concrete strength and mix
recommendations• Reinforcing Steel
77
Design for Lifting andBracing of Panels
• The handbook provides only basic guidelines for lift design
• Refers to TCA Guide and British Columbia WCB regulations for panel bracing
78
AcknowledgementsThe following provided assistance in reviewing and checking this document:
• Kevin Lemieux, Ben Benjamin, Brent Weerts; WSB Consultants
• Andy Metten; Bush Bohlman• John Wallace, Pomeroy Engineering• Perry Adebar, Ken Elwood; UBC• Ron DuVall; RJC• Jim Mutrie; JKK• Walid Salmon, Sal Tabot, Calvin Schmitke; Krahn
Engineering• Bill McKevitt; McKevitt EngineeringAnd of course Rick McGrath and Andy Viser of CPCA
27
79
End of Presentation