Download - Theory - Participatory Development
Theory - Participatory Development
• What is it?• Involvement by a local population to create
and implement programs to improve their lives
• Built on a belief that citizens can be trusted to shape their own future
• Participatory development uses local decision making and capacities to steer and define the nature of an intervention
Theory – Participatory Development
• Participatory Development – From USAID study involving a variety of interventions– Greater upfront investment– Throughout program overall costs average lower– More relevant and effective at addressing local
needs– Gains are more often sustained– Involvement of women and youth will improve
their status
Vision Statement
What is our program?
Executive
LeadershipMonitoring
and Evaluation
FinanceEducationSport
What is our program?SPORT• Soccer teams (separate teams for boys and girls)• Objectives – challenge gender roles, build social networks,
and empower participants• Overseen by the Sport Committee
– MYSA and MTGP – K as model organizations. Both started with soccer and then added.
– neo-colonialism by displacing traditional games?• Scholars counter that soccer is reinterpreted by different cultures.
Demonstrated by how the sport is played and watched in various countries
– Playing traditional male games such as soccer can provide a more direct challenge to male power and wider socio-cultural relations…compared to ‘female’ games like netball - Saavedra
What is our program?SPORT• ‘Fun’ days – Segregated and Co-ed games• Objectives – challenge gender roles, build social
networks, empower participants, and teach human rights.– F4P and Sugden advocated segregated programs
because of culture. However, F4P program not directly dealing with gender equality
– Feel that integrated games will offer opportunities to teach and discuss human rights• HIV/AIDS programs more successful when ideas are taught
through games as opposed to class room sessions – Kruse• Similar to F4P – Co-ed games can offer teachable moments
What is our program?
EDUCATION• Objectives – Develop knowledge and awareness of
GBV and HR, challenge gender roles, empowerment participants, and build social networks
• Linked to Freir’s idea of developing a critical conscious• Overseen by the Educational Committee– Workshops (segregated and integrated)– Games (segregated and integrated)– Connect to other organizations working in the area of GBV
and HR
What is our program?LEADERSHIP• Peer Educators• Objectives – Awareness of GBV and HR, gender roles, empowerment,
safe spaces• Examples from MYSA, MTGP-K, OYAP, NSGA, FAWE
Munro – after food , water, shelter, health and education, nothing is more important for future development than providing good role models for our youth
- Perceived similarity to learner- Self efficacy expectancy – belief that one is able to perform a
behaviour- Outcome expectancy – belief that behaviour can result in
desired outcome- Benefits of being a peer educator and people as an outcome
How will we train staff and volunteers?
• Coaches (adults and peer educators)– SLFA and FIFA GOAL program – similar to MYSA and KFA
• Referees (adults and peer educators)– SLFA and FIFA GOAL program
• Peer educators – NSGA and FAWE– Kerrigan and Kruse – Many peer education program lack
ongoing support. Peer educators benefit from continued support, the opportunity to reflect on learning, and the opportunity to build networks
• Substantial initial investment followed by transfer of responsibilities
Monitoring and Evaluation
DIFFICULTIES WITH M&E• Accountability vs Development - Coalter– Who is benefiting from program evaluation?– What is the purpose of M&E
• Summative vs Formative - OFFS– Simple outcome measurement is insufficient.
Can’t answer which sports and sports processes produce which outcomes for which sections of the populations in which circumstances - Patriksson
Monitoring and Evaluation
• Theory Based Evaluation– Attempts to assess the process. Not just beginning
and end– How is the program supposed to work?
Monitoring and Evaluation(Coalter and sportanddev.org toolkit)
• Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation– Overseen by the M&E committee– MYSA, MTGP-K, OYAPWhen organizations involve their members in M&E this leads
to (Coalter):– Capacity building and sustainability (SCORE)– Greater ownership, understanding, and integration (MYSA)– An ability to reflect on and analyze attitudes, beliefs and
behaviour (DFiD)– Direct assault on hegemonic knowledge (Elabor-Idemudia)
Theory based participatory monitoring and evaluation
STEP 1:Stake holders identify
problem and collaboratively discuss the causes and solutions to this problem
• Example:Problem Tree
Theory based participatory monitoring and evaluation
STEP 2: From the problem tree the project
objectives/goals are chosenOur objectives:– Challenge gender roles– Empowerment– Build social networks– HR awareness– GBV awareness
Theory based participatory monitoring and evaluation
STEP 3:• Develop activities that can address these
objectivesOur Activities:– Soccer and other games– Education– Leadership
Theory based participatory monitoring and evaluation
STEP 4:• Stakeholders develop indicators for how the program will
measure achievement of objectivesExample:• Objective – Challenge Gender Roles• Activity – Women’s soccer program• Indicators – Perception of gender roles among participants,
Distribution and access to resources, Equal representation of women and men in leadership positions within the soccer program (coaches, referees, committees)
Theory based participatory monitoring and evaluation
STEP 5:• Decide on how to measure the indicatorsExamples:• Surveys• Focus groups• InterviewsSTEP 6: • Decide how to publish the results so stakeholder have an
opportunity to review and provide feedbackExamples: Posters, flyers, newsletters, community meetings
(through the soccer games)
Environmental Impact
• Where is our equipment coming from?• What is the environmental impact of shipping
goods to Sierra Leone?