The Labour-Leisure ChoicePart 1: Robinson Crusoe
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis
Universidad Autonoma de Madrid
Autumn 2012
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 1 / 29
The Economics of Robinson Crusoe
Suppose the economy is populated by a single individual (RobinsonCrusoe). At the end of each day, Robinson consumes the proceeds ofhis work (coco nuts).
To characterize Robinson’s choices, we need to specify his:
I Production technology
I Preferences over consumption and leisure (or work)
I Time constraint
For the moment we assume that the unique final good is perishable.Hence, Robinson cannot save — i.e. move goods to the next period.
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 2 / 29
Production technology
The production technology is fully described by a production function.It specifies a unique level of output for each combination of inputs.
Formally,y = Af (k, l)
where k denotes capital (machines) and l denotes the units of labor(time devoted to work). Finally, A denotes the level of technology orTotal Factor Productivity (TFP).
Throughout the course we often consider production functions of thetype:
y = Alαk1−α para α ∈ (0, 1)
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 3 / 29
Cobb-Douglas Production Functions
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 4 / 29
Neo-classical production functions
The class of neo-classical production functions satisfies the followingcharacteristics:
1 The production function passes through the origin (F (0, 0) = 0)
2 Strictly positive and decreasing marginal productivity
i Fk (k , l) = ∂F (k,l)∂k > 0; Fl (k , l) = ∂F (k,l)
∂l > 0
ii Fkk (k , l) = ∂Fk (k,l)∂k < 0; Fll (k , l) = ∂Fl (k,l)
∂l < 0
3 Constant returns to scale (F (λk , λl) = λF (k , l))
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 5 / 29
Robinson’s Production Technology
Suppose that k = 1. In this case we can write the per capita outputof Robinson, y , as a function of l ,
y = f (l) = Alα
Similarly, Robinson’s Marginal Product of Labour (MPL) is defined as:
PML = f ′ (l) =∂y
∂l
With our Cobb-Douglas production function we obtain:
f ′ (l) =∂y
∂l= αAlα−1 > 0
f′′(l) =
∂2y
∂l2= α (α− 1) Alα−2 < 0
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 6 / 29
MPL
F
l
F
l
y t= f(l)
PML
lt
PML= f’(l)
Pendiente = f’(l) =PML
l1 l2l1l2
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 7 / 29
Preferences
We represent the preferences with the aid of a (twice continuouslydifferentiable) utility function
u (c , l)
with
u1 (c , l) =∂u
∂c> 0 y u2 (c , l) =
∂u
∂l< 0.
Assuming that agents have one unit of time at their disposal we canalso use the following notation:
u (c, 1− l) ,
where 1− l represents leisure and in this case u2 > 0
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 8 / 29
Example: Logarithmic Utility
Throughout the course we frequently use the convenient example oflogarithmic utility. An example of this class of preferences is:
u (c , 1− l) = log (c) + ρ log (1− l) ,
where ρ > 0 is a parameter that measures the relative weight of leisure inthe utility function.
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 9 / 29
Indifference curves
Indifference curves are defined by all the combinations of c and l thatprovide the same level of utility
Formally, suppose we are interested in the combinations of c and lthat yield u utils. In other words, with ρ = 1
u = log (c) + log (1− l)
Notice that we can rewrite this expression as
eu = c (1− l)
and so
c =eu
1− l
The indifference curves have a positive (negative) slope in the plane(c , l) ((c , 1− l)).
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 10 / 29
Indifference curves
c
l
Curvas de indiferencia
u3
u2
u1
u4
dl
dc
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 11 / 29
The Marginal Rate of Substitution between Consumptionand Leisure
The slope of the indifference curve is known as the MRS betweenconsumption and leisure.
Suppose we raise l by an infinitesimally small amount (dl) . The MRS tellsus by how much we need to raise c to keep the level of utility constant.Taking the total derivative,
du = 0 = u1 (c , 1− l) dc + u2 (c , 1− l) (−1) dl
u1 (c , 1− l) dc︸ ︷︷ ︸utility gain
= u2 (c, 1− l) dl︸ ︷︷ ︸utility loss
MRS =dc
dl=
u2 (c , 1− l)u1 (c , 1− l)
> 0
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 12 / 29
The Labour-Leisure Choice
We now have all the necessary elements to characterize the optimal choiceof labor and leisure:
Recall that the unique final good is perishable.
Given that Crusoe cannot store goods, in every period he willconsume his entire output. Hence,
ct = yt = f (lt) ∀t
In the absence of shocks Robinson therefore needs to resolve the samestatic problem in each period.
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 13 / 29
Labor-Leisure decisions
Formally, Robinson needs to solve the following constrainedoptimization problem
Maxc,l
[u (c , 1− l)]
s.a
c = f (l)
The best option is to solve this problem with the help of thesubstitution method. Replacing c in the maximand by f (l), weobtain:
Maxl
[u (f (l) , 1− l)]
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 14 / 29
The optimal choice
The first-order condition (FOC) that characterizes the optimal choiceis given by:
u1 (f (l) , 1− l) f ′ (l) + u2 (f (l) , 1− l) (−1) = 0
u1(f (l), 1− l)f ′(l)︸ ︷︷ ︸marginal benefit
= u2(f (l), 1− l)︸ ︷︷ ︸marginal cost
MRS =u2 (c , 1− l)u1 (c , 1− l)
= f ′ (l) = MPL
Notice that MPL can be interpreted as the marginal rate oftransformation of labor in goods.
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 15 / 29
Graphical representation
Trabajo l
Consumoc
c*
c=y=f(l)
u1u2
l*
A
E
D
B
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 16 / 29
Exercise I
Suppose Robinson’s preferences satisfy
u(c , 1− l) = ln(c) + ρln(1− l).
a. Derive the expression for the MRS.
b. How does the value of the MRS change if we raise the value of l?
c. What is the effect on MRS of a rise in the value of ρ?
Answers:
a. MRS = ρ(
c1−l
).
b. The MRS is an increasing function of l . At higher values of l theworker needs a larger compensation for further losses of leisure.
c. A rise in ρ leads to a rise in the value of the RMS for given values ofc and l .
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 17 / 29
Exercise I
Suppose Robinson’s preferences satisfy
u(c , 1− l) = ln(c) + ρln(1− l).
a. Derive the expression for the MRS.
b. How does the value of the MRS change if we raise the value of l?
c. What is the effect on MRS of a rise in the value of ρ?
Answers:
a. MRS = ρ(
c1−l
).
b. The MRS is an increasing function of l . At higher values of l theworker needs a larger compensation for further losses of leisure.
c. A rise in ρ leads to a rise in the value of the RMS for given values ofc and l .
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 17 / 29
Exercise II
Suppose that
f (l) = Alα, and that u(c , 1− l) = log(c) + log(1− l).
a. Derive the FOC and demonstrate that the optimal values of c∗ y l∗
satisfy the following condition:
u2 (c∗, 1− l∗)u1 (c∗, 1− l∗)
= f ′ (l∗)
b. Derive the expressions for c∗ y l∗ and analyze the effects of anincrease in A and α on the optimal choices of Robinson.
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 18 / 29
Solutions
a. The FOC associated with maxl
[log(Alα) + log(1− l)] is given by:
1
AlααAlα−1 =
1
1− l
Hence:
MPL = f ′(l) = αAlα−1 =Alα
1− l= MRS
b. The FOC implies that
α =l
1− l
Thus, l∗ = α1+α and c∗ = A
(α
1+α
)α.
It follows immediately that ∂l∗/∂α > 0 and ∂l∗/∂A = 0, while∂c∗/∂α > 0 and ∂c∗/∂A > 0.
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 19 / 29
The Lagrange methodThe alternative is to use the Lagrange method. The Lagrangian associatedwith our optimization problem can be written as
L = u (c , 1− l) + λ [f (l)− c ]
where λ denotes the Lagrange multiplier. The FOCs are given by:
∂L
∂ct= u1 (c , 1− l)− λ = 0
∂L
∂lt= u2 (c , 1− l) (−1) + λf ′ (lt) = 0
∂L
∂λ= f (lt)− ct = 0
As λ = u1 (c , 1− l) , we again obtain the standard optimality condition
u2 (c , 1− l)u1 (c , 1− l)
= f ′ (l)
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 20 / 29
Productivity shocks
Our next objective is to study the effects of productivity shocks on thechoices of Robinson.
In general, productivity shocks produce both income and substitutioneffects.
In the case Robinson’s island economy, productivity shocks may be duechanges in the weather conditions. In modern business cycle models onthe contrary productivity shocks may be driven by a wide range of factorssuch as changes in energy prices, climate conditions, arrival of newtechnologies etc.
For the moment we maintain the assumption of perishable goods. Theoptimization problem of Robinson is therefore static although productivityshocks may be persistent.
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 21 / 29
Example I: Parallel shift of the production function
l
f(l)
l
f(l)
PML
PML
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 22 / 29
Example II: A positive TFP shock
F
l
f(l)
F
l
f(l)
PML
lt
PML
PML
lt
PML
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 23 / 29
Definitions
Income effect: An increase in output for any given choice of l , but nochange in the MPL schedule.
Substitution effect: A change in the MPL, or equivalently the marginalrate of transformation of labor into consumption.
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 24 / 29
Example III: A Pure Income Effect
u2
Trabajo l
Consumoc
c0
c=y=f(l)
u1
l0
A
Trabajo l
Consumoc
c0
c=y=f(l)
u1
l0
A
B
l1
c1
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 25 / 29
Example IV: The Effects of a Pure Substitution Effect
u2
Trabajo l
Consumoc
c0
y=f(l)
u1
l0
A
Trabajo l
Consumoc
c0
y=f(l)
u1
l0
A
B
l1
c1
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 26 / 29
Combined Income and Substitution EffectsSuppose that Robinson has a fixed endowment a ≥ 0 of consumptiongoods and that f (l) = AL. Accordingly,
c = a + Al
andMax
l[log (a + Al) + log (1− l)]
Notice that the FOC for this problem can be written as
1
a + AlA =
1
1− l
And so,
l∗ =A− a
2A
c∗ =A
2+
a
2
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 27 / 29
Combined Income and Substitution Effects
In our example,
The increase in a generates a pure income effect. In response to thispositive income effect, Robinson increases both leisure andconsumption.
The increase in A produces both income and substitution effects.The latter dominate as Robinson’s optimal labor supply is rising in A.
Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis (UAM) The Labour-Leisure Choice Autumn 2012 28 / 29