-
8/3/2019 The Editor to the Texas Atty Gen to the FBI Voice of the Mainland 2 8 12
1/10
Historia Chicana8 February 2012
Voice of the MainlandURL:http://voiceofthemainland.blogspot.com/#!/2012/02/to-texas-attorney-general-and-to.html
Accessed: 8 February 2012
To the Texas Attorney General and to the Federal
Bureau of Investigation
By Bernardo Eureste, Editor
Voice of the Mainland8 February 2012
The public media have gone head over heels over the ranting and raving of Luis Vera, the attorney forLULAC, in the Texas redistricting fight.
The Texas Attorney General said it very clear yesterday when he recognized the major Latino partiesentering an agreement with Texas in the Texas redistricting legal battle and cited: Texas LULAC,
MALDEF, GI Forum, Southwest Voter Registration Education Project, Domingo Garca, The MexicanAmerican Bar Association of Texas, and La Fe Policy Research and Education Center. There were alsothe Southwest Workers Union and NOMAR. These organizations are all well-known Latinoorganizations, known to people nationally and in Texas and very representative of Latinos in Texas.
Many of these organizations were born in Texas.
The Texas LULAC and the Luis Vera LULAC needs some clarification.
The Luis Vera LULAC that is getting all of the media attention is a paper tiger, in Texas and in most ofthe United States.
The Luis Vera LULAC is led by a national board of directors who are elected into office at each year'snational LULAC convention. The election which elected the current slate of national LULAC leaderswas held in Cincinnati, Ohio this past July where LULAC held its national convention.
LULAC has been going through a national struggle for leadership since 1994 when the national electionheld in El Paso, Texas was decided by 325 delegates who were flown in from the island of Puerto Ricoto a convention that normally hosts 450 to 500 delegates from throughout the United States. The El Paso
http://voiceofthemainland.blogspot.com/#!/2012/02/to-texas-attorney-general-and-to.htmlhttp://voiceofthemainland.blogspot.com/#!/2012/02/to-texas-attorney-general-and-to.htmlhttp://voiceofthemainland.blogspot.com/#!/2012/02/to-texas-attorney-general-and-to.htmlhttp://voiceofthemainland.blogspot.com/#!/2012/02/to-texas-attorney-general-and-to.html -
8/3/2019 The Editor to the Texas Atty Gen to the FBI Voice of the Mainland 2 8 12
2/10
convention had just over 800 delegates. The conservative candidate for President won with a margin of1 to 5 votes. There were five counters. Puerto Rico's first thrust into LULAC national politics gave 325delegate votes to the conservative winner. Mainland LULAC'ers broke at about 400 for the liberalcandidate and 77 for the conservative candidate. Puerto Rico voted its entire slate of delegates for theconservative candidate. This new arrangement was repeated each year, since LULAC elects its national
officers each year. In 1998, new candidates had to run, since national office holders cannot serve formore than four years. In 1998 in Dallas, island Puerto Rico showed up with 340 delegates. The victoryagain went to the conservative candidate, who won by 16 votes. Again mainland liberal LULAC'ersmade up 75% of the mainland delegate vote. In 1999-2000, the FBI investigated, charged and gotindictments against island Puerto Rico government officials, some going to prison. Island Puerto Ricostayed out of LULAC politics until 2010, when they showed up with 225 delegates at the nationalconvention in Albuquerque.
The island Puerto Rico strategy regarding LULAC is orchestrated by island Puerto Rico's ruling party,the New Progressive Party, also known as the PNP. Its governor is Luis Fortuno.
In Puerto Rico, the politics of island stauts has the PNP supporting statehood. Opposition parties supportcommonwealth status (current status), independent status and no change in status.
Over the 50 years, Puerto Rico has had three plebiscites on the issue of status, 1967, 1993 and 1998.Each time, statehood and independence have lost out to status quo.
The PNP made a decision in 1994 to use LULAC as its mainland forum to have LULAC lobby for itsstatehood status. They supported that decision by paying for the transportation, lodging and feeding ofthe hundreds of island Puerto Ricans who are flown in to the LULAC national conventions. That runsinto over one million dollars each year. The PNP gets government contractors to pay the bill. InAlbuquerque, the Plaza in downtown Albuquerque had island Puerto Rico entertainment during theLULAC convention there in 2010. Several banquets were hosted by island Puerto Rico. Many mainlandLULACers have given up on the national conventions, why go and spend money if the elections will bedecided by the Puerto Rican PNP.
The history of LULAC has LULAC organized in states throughout the US. The strongest stateorganization of LULAC is Texas, the LULAC cradle.
The current battle in LULAC is to figure out how national LULAC can control Texas LULAC.
In 2011 as we got into the Texas redistricting fight, the word went out from Luis Vera, nationalLULAC's legal counsel, that Texas LULAC should not self-direct its Texas redistricting strategy. TexasLULAC wanted to join the Texas Latino Redistricting Task Force (TLRTF). Luis Vera sent out a moredirect letter. Do not join the TLRTF or heads will roll. The Texas LULAC Board voted to have TexasLULAC join the TLRTF. In response to this decision, Luis Vera engineered a complaint against JoeyCrdenas, the State Director of Texas LULAC. The complaint resulted in a hearing to impeach JoeyCardenas on October 1, 2011. The hearing was rigged. Joey Crdenas was impeached and removed fromoffice. Crdenas had served as state director for 3 years and was in his 4th year as director, his last. Hehad 9 months to serve out his term. He had no challenger
-
8/3/2019 The Editor to the Texas Atty Gen to the FBI Voice of the Mainland 2 8 12
3/10
The national board named Florinda Chvez, the Deputy Director of Texas LULAC, which is the next inline scheme in the organization, as the State Director. Ms. Chvez is on the same page that TexasLULAC is on the matter of the redistricting agreement.
The word on the LULAC street is that the national board will remove Ms. Chavez and replace her with aState Director who dances to the national board's music. On the street LULAC'ers know who that personis.
The purpose of this opinion piece is to ask the question, who is National LULAC and what is its role inthe Texas redistricting process?
Texas LUAC'ers spoke on the Texas redistricting effort. They decided through their board of directors tojoin up with the TLRTF.
What we know of national LULAC is that their politics is controlled by island Puerto Rico money. Why
should that national board be sticking their nose into the Texas redistricting effort?
Luis Vera's only interest in the Texas redistricting effort is to protect the Congressional District ofCongressman Lloyd Doggett.
All of the Latino organizations who joined up to fight for Latino interests in the Texas redistricting fighthave agreed to the redistricting plans that were announced on Monday. The State of Texas is on board.
Luis Vera says...No! With that, National LULAC says...No!
Who is Luis Vera? And who is National LULAC in the Texas redistricting fight when all of the majorLatino organizations are saying that we have an agreement?
National LULAC should be investigated by the Attorney General of Texas for violating the charterprovisions under which LULAC was organized. What is a Texas chartered not for profit organizationdoing being a lobbying agency for island Puerto Rico? What is Luis Vera doing running a lobbyinggame for Lloyd Doggett in the redistricting fight? Is that what national LULAC is all about, becomingthe lobbying arm for causes that are not the causes of mainland Latinos and Texas Latinos?
Who is paying Luis Vera's bill? Lloyd Doggett? National LULAC? Island Puerto Rico? The bill must bein the hundreds of thousands. Who is paying that bill?
The Texas Attorney General should not pay heed to Luis Vera or National LULAC. They are papertigers. The conservatives in Texas LUAC support the State of Texas and the liberals in Texas LULACsupport the agreement that MALDEF was able to work out with the state as the attorney for the TexasLatino Redistricting Task Force. Forget Luis Vera and national LULAC, they are paper tigers.
Island Puerto Rico does not vote in Texas. Island Puerto Rico is a colony of the United States. They donot vote in federal elections. They do not pay federal income taxes. Their per capita is $17, 692, 1/3 ofthe US and they fly 340 delegates to LULAC conventions in the US, some in first class seats. Google r/t
-
8/3/2019 The Editor to the Texas Atty Gen to the FBI Voice of the Mainland 2 8 12
4/10
flights from San Juan to El Paso, Albuquerque, Dallas, Cincinnati to get a feel of the millions of dollarsthat the PNP has spent to control national LULAC.
Voice of the Mainland
URL:http://voiceofthemainland.blogspot.com/2012/02/luis-vera-does-not-speak-for-texas.html#!/2012/02/luis-vera-
does-not-speak-for-texas.html
Accessed: 8 February 2012
By Bernardo Eureste, Editor
Voice of the Mainland
6 February 2012
Luis Vera Does Not Speak for Texas LULAC
Luis Vera is the attorney for National LULAC. Vera and Rosa Rosales got the National LULAC Board
to remove Joey Crdenas from his position in Texas LULAC as State Director. National LULAC does
not carry much water with LULACers in Texas. It appears that Vera and Rosales interest was to have
National LULAC be the Latino spear for Lloyd Doggett in the Texas redistricting fight. Rather than
push for a Latino agenda, Vera and National LULAC lost their footing and got into the Texas
redistricting battle to support Doggett. Vera and Rosales dont do anything for free. Texas LULACers
supported Joey Crdenas and the Texas LULAC Board who decided to join up with the Texas Latino
Redistricting Task Force in the late summer of 2011. Joey Crdenas had charges drummed up against
him by Vera and Rosales and had Crdenas impeached by the National LULAC Board in October 2011.
National LULAC is controlled by money that is pumped in from the political right of Puerto Rico, where
the government party, the PNP pumps about $1,000,000 to fly island Puerto Ricans to national LULAC
conventions where they outdo the liberal base in mainland LULAC, which is about 70 to 75 of the
delegate count in national conventions. In 1994, island Puerto Rico flew in 325 island Puerto Rico
delegates to the convention in El Paso. They block voted to give the election by 4 votes to a conservative
mainland LULACer. They repeated this strategy in 1995, 1996, 1997 and then again in 1998. In 1998,
they brought in 340 delegates, about 40% of the delegates to the national convention in Dallas. Again,the winning margin was 16 votes for the conservative mainland LULACer who won. The US federal
government, FBI, took down politicians in Puerto Rico in late 1999 through 2001. Island Puerto Rico
was not active in national LULAC until 2010, where they brought 225 delegates to the national
convention to Albuquerque. Again, the conservative LULACer won, Margaret Moran. Luis Vera does
not speak for Texas LULACers.
Bernardo Eureste
http://voiceofthemainland.blogspot.com/2012/02/luis-vera-does-not-speak-for-texas.html#!/2012/02/luis-vera-does-not-speak-for-texas.htmlhttp://voiceofthemainland.blogspot.com/2012/02/luis-vera-does-not-speak-for-texas.html#!/2012/02/luis-vera-does-not-speak-for-texas.htmlhttp://voiceofthemainland.blogspot.com/2012/02/luis-vera-does-not-speak-for-texas.html#!/2012/02/luis-vera-does-not-speak-for-texas.htmlhttp://voiceofthemainland.blogspot.com/2012/02/luis-vera-does-not-speak-for-texas.html#!/2012/02/luis-vera-does-not-speak-for-texas.htmlhttp://voiceofthemainland.blogspot.com/2012/02/luis-vera-does-not-speak-for-texas.html#!/2012/02/luis-vera-does-not-speak-for-texas.htmlhttp://voiceofthemainland.blogspot.com/2012/02/luis-vera-does-not-speak-for-texas.html -
8/3/2019 The Editor to the Texas Atty Gen to the FBI Voice of the Mainland 2 8 12
5/10
Editor
http://voiceofthemainland.blogspot.com/
Voice of the Mainland
URL:http://voiceofthemainland.blogspot.com/2011/07/charges-made-by-members-of-lulac.html#!/2011/07/charges-made-by-members-of-lulac.html
Accessed: 8 February 2012
The Charges Made by Members of the LULAC National
Board against Editor on August 28, 2010
By Bernardo Eureste, EditorVoice of the Mainland
4 July 2011
Below you will find a copy of the charges presented by members of the National LULAC Board that
resulted in a hearing held by National to expel the Editor on October 2, 2010. The persons responsible
for the charges are:
Sylvia Gonzales, LULAC National VP for Southwest
Juan Carlos Lizardi, National VP for Southeast
Rolando Gonzalez, National VP for the Elderly
Manuel Rendon, National VP for Young Adults
Magadena Rivera, National VP for Midwest
Esther Degraves , National VP for Northeast
Regla Gonzalez, National VP for Women
Toula Politis Lugo, National Chaplain
Mickie S. Luna, National VP for Farwest
Bertha Urteaga, National VP for Youth
Your responses have been very supportive. I need the address for Manuel Rendn.
I have had several persons asking to be coordinators of any fundraising efforts that might be needed. The
filing against 14 defendants will run at about $1,300.00. The coordinator/s of that effort will be
announced later this week.
I have already written the petition. The facts of the case are clear. The procedure used to expel the
Editor, a member of LULAC, not an office holder is bad. If LULAC were a government, members of
http://voiceofthemainland.blogspot.com/http://voiceofthemainland.blogspot.com/2011/07/charges-made-by-members-of-lulac.html#!/2011/07/charges-made-by-members-of-lulac.htmlhttp://voiceofthemainland.blogspot.com/2011/07/charges-made-by-members-of-lulac.html#!/2011/07/charges-made-by-members-of-lulac.htmlhttp://voiceofthemainland.blogspot.com/2011/07/charges-made-by-members-of-lulac.html#!/2011/07/charges-made-by-members-of-lulac.htmlhttp://voiceofthemainland.blogspot.com/2011/07/charges-made-by-members-of-lulac.html#!/2011/07/charges-made-by-members-of-lulac.htmlhttp://voiceofthemainland.blogspot.com/2011/07/charges-made-by-members-of-lulac.html#!/2011/07/charges-made-by-members-of-lulac.htmlhttp://voiceofthemainland.blogspot.com/2011/07/charges-made-by-members-of-lulac.html#!/2011/07/charges-made-by-members-of-lulac.htmlhttp://voiceofthemainland.blogspot.com/ -
8/3/2019 The Editor to the Texas Atty Gen to the FBI Voice of the Mainland 2 8 12
6/10
LULAC could be summarily subjected to midnight raids, taken to the gulag and having the keys thrown
away, like what the German Nazis did to Eurorpeans from 1935 through 1945, what Porfirio Diaz did to
the Maderistas in 1905-1910, what Stalin did to his countrymen in the 1940's and '50's.
LULAC is a civic organization. It has a constitution and a set of by-laws. All members of LULAC are
guided by the constitution as to the duties and rights of officers and members of the organization.LULAC has very clearly drawn out sections in its constitution on how to impeach or remove officers.
Removing members involves a process that starts at the council level. This is the protection that lowly
LULAC members have against tyrant officers in the organization, at any level, at district, at state or at
national. Like the Editor, his problem is with the national board, not with state, district or council. To
expel the Editor, LULAC needed to get members of LULAC Council 612 to initiate a process to
impeach him, to remove him from his council. The district director could not initiate the process, neither
could the state, and neither could the national. The constitution has the step printed in its constitution at
Article VIII, Section 8, subsection b, sub-subsection (2)
"b. Charges against a member or officer may be brought by a Local Council, a member, or anotherofficer, following the guidelines below:
"[F]ollowing the guidelines below" in "b." above should mean something to a LULAC member. The
constitution is his protection, his guide, his rule book, his company's rules.
"(2) Charges against Officers at District, State and National levels and Local Councils shall forward
their charges directly to the National President. Charges against members shall be presented at the
council level;"
A member may be removed in LULAC, but the action, "Charges against members shall be presented atthe council level;" The word "shall" has no equivocation in law.
The LULAC procedure for removing a LULAC person is spelled out in Section 8.b.1 through 9.
b. Charges against a member or officer may be brought by a
(2) Charges against Officers at District, State and National levels and Local Councils shall forward their
charges directly to the National President. Charges against members shall be presented at the council
level;
(3) If the accused is the National President the charges shall be forwarded to the National Treasurer or
any National Vice President;
(4) The National President or the National Treasurer or any National Vice President, upon the receipt of
the charges, shall inform the accused and schedule a hearing for the next meeting of the National Board
of Directors.
-
8/3/2019 The Editor to the Texas Atty Gen to the FBI Voice of the Mainland 2 8 12
7/10
(5) If the National Board of Directors determines that there is reasonable cause to support the charges,
the
case will be dismissed and all references to the charges will be stricken from the record;
(6) If the National Board of Directors determines that there is reasonable cause to support the charges
the National Officer shall be removed from office and this decision will be final;
(7) If the National Board of Directors determines that the accused should also be expelled from the
League, the accused shall have the right to appeal this decision to the National Assembly;
(8) The decision of the National Assembly rendered by a majority vote shall be final;
(9) The accused shall have the right to legal counsel at the hearing before the National Board of
Directors and the National Assembly guidelines below:
(1) Charges must be in writing, sworn to by the individual or council and giving the name of the accused
and the details of causes;
Section 8.b.(9) states very clearly that at a hearing before the board, once you get there, the accused shall
have a right to counsel. A right to counsel was denied the Editor in the telephonic hearing that was held
on October 2, 2010.
Section 8.b.7 states that if the National Board of Directors determines that the accused should be
removed, the "accused shall have the right to appeal this decision to the National Assembly." The
procedure is very "American," but its applied like the Syrian, the Iranian, the Nazi government or
Stalin's government in Russia might have applied it. Summary proceedings, remove the "bastard," off to
the gulag with him,
Section 8.b.(7) If the National Board of Directors determines that the accused should also be expelled
from the League, the accused shall have the right to appeal this decision to the National Assembly;
The Editor was never notified of the Board's action on October 2, 2010. Had he been notified, he would
have appealed the decision to the national assembly.
As you will recall, LULAC was a defunct organization from April 8, 2005 through October 14, 2010.
The Texas Secretary of State had involuntarily dissolved the organization for that period of time.
LULAC as a legal entity ceased to exist on April 8, 2005. Acts for, against, on behalf of LULAC have
no legal standing without a corporate charter. LULAC had no corporate charter during this time period.A mangy dog could have come from the street and pissed all over LULAC from April 8, 2005 to
October 14, 2010 and LULAC, as an organization, would not have been able to mount a legal challenge.
Losing corporate status is serious business. You lose legal standing. If someone wanted to sue LULAC
during that time, you would sue the individuals who were the last persons on the board of the
organization during that time period. If persons acted on behalf of the organization during that time
-
8/3/2019 The Editor to the Texas Atty Gen to the FBI Voice of the Mainland 2 8 12
8/10
period and you wanted to sue the organization for acts or omissions, you would sue the individuals on
the board at the time.
If you are a dissolved organization, the corporation or business entity is informed by the Secretary of
State or by the Texas State Comptroller that the organization is to cease conducting business. LULAC
knew by October 2, 2010 that it did not have a state charter to conduct business. The Editor wroteseveral articles about this dissolved status weeks before that date.
Any article that the Editor wrote from April 8, 2005 through October 14, 2010 that was critical against
LULAC would be like the dog pissing on the stairs of LULAC. The organization had no standing. It had
no legal right to conduct business during that time period.
The Editor's lawsuit is filed against members of the board as individuals. In filing charges against the
Editor, they were acting as individuals.
The Editor will add all members of the Board who actually voted to expel the Editor. They will sued be
individually.
LULAC is included in the lawsuit because the Board became legal tender on October 14, 2010. The
complaint against LULAC is that LULAC did not expel the Editor according to the process that is laid
out in the LULAC Constitution.
The Editor does not believe that the National Board of LULAC has summary powers to have its
members expelled from the organization at will.
You should have been witness to the hearing that was conducted by National in expelling the editor. The
telephone conversation opened with Manuel Escobar talking to the Editor. Escobar is some sort of legal
counsel for national LULAC. When the Editor got on line, Escobar said you will have five minutes to
make your presentation to the Board. The charges were not read out to the Editor. The standard
procedural tradition in criminal proceeding is that the charge is read out to the accused. The party who
takes responsibility for making the charges is identified. Once the charges are read out, you are given
time to present your case, you defense.
All of you have seen enough TV, watched enough movies, read enough books and articles about being
presented with your accuser. Even Abu Ghraib terrorists are given such rights. Who is your accuser?
What are the charges?
One of the charges leveled against the Editor was "(7) Improper or immoral conduct." The charge was
not explained or elaborated on before the Editor. That charge covers a massive area of misbehavior.
What was it that the Editor do to fall into that charge? The Editor was not told.
Not at LULAC, "you have 5 minutes to present your case." The Editor asked Escobar that he would like
his legal counsel, Roger Guevara, an attorney from San Antonio, to represent him in the proceeding and
-
8/3/2019 The Editor to the Texas Atty Gen to the FBI Voice of the Mainland 2 8 12
9/10
the response from Escobar was that that would not be permitted. The Editor made a 3 minute
presentation and the hearing for the Editor ended. There were no questions from the Board, no
discussion that the Editor could hear what was being said about him.
Expelling a member of LULAC at the national board is rare, very likely the first. Its the first time that a
lowly member has had an expulsion initiated by national and concluded at national.
The Editor feels that his case is summary judgment proof.
In the case, Bernardo Eureste versus the 14 named defendants, Eureste, the Editor here, represents the
interests of the "lowly" members of LULAC. Eureste has a BA in political science, a master of social
work from Michigan, a master in public health from Michigan, a doctorate of juris prudence from
Thurgood Marshall School of Law, is a former graduate professor at Our Lady of the Lake University in
San Antonio and a former City Council member, representing District 5 in San Antonio's west side for 8
years. Eureste might be a lowly member of LULAC, but he is not a lowly person. Eureste is not afraid of
a fight. He will stand his ground. He will fight this issue to the end. The Editor's objective is to get re-instated into LULAC. There are better things to do in life. But this is a good fight. Eureste has the high
ground. He is fighting abuse, arrogance, greed, intimidation, corruption from a LULAC national board
that wants to run him, a lowly memebr of LULAC, into the ground. The board wants to use Eureste as
an example of what can happen to members who speak their mind in the organization. That is not going
to happen. The Editor is not going away. Bernardo Eureste is not going away.
-
8/3/2019 The Editor to the Texas Atty Gen to the FBI Voice of the Mainland 2 8 12
10/10
Historia Chicana
Mexican American StudiesUniversity of North Texas
Denton, Texas