Texas Environmental Resources InstituteEngineering Tomorrow’s Environment Today
Environmental and Water Resources Engineering ProgramCollege of Engineering
The University of Texas at Austin
Environmental Engineering: Top 20 Programs
Rank1-56-1011-20
Source: US News and World Report, 1998
Environmental Engineering at UT Austin
• Only top 20 program West of the Mississippi except for California and Washington
• Only top 20 program in Big XII Conference States (TX, OK, KS, CO, NE, MO, IA)
• Nearest top 20 program is 800 miles away (Georgia Tech)
Research Sponsors
Neal ArmstrongSurface Water Quality Modeling
• Characterization of point and nonpoint pollution sources
• Water quality modeling in rivers, bays and estuaries
• Effects of aquatic vegetation on water quality
• Water quality monitoring
Randall CharbeneauHydrocarbon Fate and Transport
GAS - FOOD - BEER
Ground Water Flow
Leaking TankSand
LNAPL VaporsResidual
Oil
Smear Zone
DissolvedGasoline Components
Research ObjectivesResearch Objectives
• Design of Efficient Free-Product Recovery Design of Efficient Free-Product Recovery Systems Using Trenches, Skimmer Wells, Systems Using Trenches, Skimmer Wells, Single and Dual-Pump Wells, and Vacuum Single and Dual-Pump Wells, and Vacuum Enhanced Recovery SystemsEnhanced Recovery Systems
• Evaluate Potential Exposure to Evaluate Potential Exposure to Hydrocarbon Contaminated GroundwaterHydrocarbon Contaminated Groundwater
Plume Reduction Through Biodegradation
Tank
Tank MTBE(Conservative Tracer)
BTEX(Biodegrading Plume)
Richard L. Corsi Indoor Air Quality
Indoor air quality is of great importance to the collective health of Texans
Texans spend 90% of their time indoors
Levels of hazardous air pollutants and allergens are generally much greater indoors than outdoors
Studies suggest that poor IAQ causes as much as a 168 billion dollar/year drag on the U.S. economy.
Indoor Air Quality Research & Initiatives at UT Austin
Volatilization of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) from drinking water to indoor air
Indoor air quality in public schools Emissions of HAPs from computers Emissions of HAPs from photocopy machines Human exposure to HAPs - that new car odor Interaction of HAPs with indoor materials HAP levels in homes above contaminated soil Development of a state-of-the-art indoor air quality model
for residential homes, public schools, and office buildings
Interaction of Hazardous Air Pollutants & Indoor Materials
The following slides include the results of recent studies to better understand how volatile and hazardous air pollutants interact with indoor materials. Such interactions can lead to prolonged chemical retention in homes, schools, and offices. Humans may then be exposed to these chemicals via ingestion (e.g., eating food that was contaminated by air pollutants), dermal contact (e.g., infant skin contact with contaminated carpet), or inhalation (e.g., as chemicals are slowly released from materials to indoor air over time). The latter is clearly illustrated when non-smokers receive a “smoking” room in a hotel, and find the odors objectionable. These odors are from chemicals that desorb from material surfaces such as carpet, walls, and curtains.
Dichlorobenzene: Carpet
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 2 4 6 8 10Time (hr)
C/C
in
pad1 (6/23)
pad1 (7/4)
pad2 (7/6)
h80% (7/17)
h80% (7/19)
h50% (7/23)
5ppm (8/23)
15ppm (8/26)
model
These results were obtained in a novel test chamber at UT. They depict the extent to which dichlorobenzene (a major ingredient of moth cakes and a suspected human carcinogen) can adsorb to carpet under various conditions. The solid line depicts what the dichlorobenzene concentration would be in the absence of the material. Such results can be used to develop parameters that allow for the prediction of chemical storage and release over time.
Predicted & Measured: PERC
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 4 8 12 16 20
Time (hr)
C/C
in
measured predicted
These results depict the concentration of tetrachloroethene (a suspected human carcinogen and common dry cleaning agent) in air adjacent to carpet. The symbols depict measured data. The solid line represents predicted values using a novel model developed at UT. The good comparison between predicted and measured values indicates that the model can be used for predicting levels of pollutants in indoor air after indoor contamination, and should be useful for establishing delay times prior to humans re-occupying a contaminated building.
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 2 4 6 8 10Time (hr)
C/C
inCp1 (w /)
Cp2 (w /)
Cp3 (w /)
Cp1
Cp2
Cp3
Vinyl F
Wood F
Unp GB
P GB
W GB
Ceiling T
Uphols
Show er S
Apples
Reference
Material Effects: DCB
These results illustrate the extent to which dichlorobenzene is adsorbed to several different materials over a 10 hour release period. Carpet appears to be the interior material with the greatest affinity for sorbing and storing dichlorobenzene. However, sorption can also occur to material such as unpainted, painted, and wall-papered gypsum board, vinyl flooring, and even to apples that are left exposed to contaminants in indoor air.
Earnest F. GloynaSuper Critical Water Oxidation (SCWO)
• Hazardous wastewater converted to near drinking water quality standards
• Can take less than one minute of treatment time• Environmentally friendly and economical• By-products are:
– recoverable heat
– acceptable gaseous emissions
– possible inorganic precipitates
– small amounts of oxidized ash
Using SCWO to Treat Wastewater
• Wastewater contains 30% hazardous organic substrate.• Treated effluent can meet drinking water quality
Using SCWO to Treat Sludge
• Hazardous biological sludge contains 5% foul organic substrate• Treated effluent can be released to the environment
Hillary Hart:Environmental Risk Communication
• Good environmental policy requires good communication.
• Such policy is crafted by many stakeholders: government, business, regulators, the public.
• Stakeholders must talk same language.
Who Thinks Environmental Risk Communication Is Necessary?
• “ . . . decision-making responsibility involving risk issues must be shared with the American people.”
– William Ruckelhaus, 1986
• “ . . . we must ensure that [citizens have] a fuller understanding of the inevitable tradeoffs . . . in the management of risk.”
– Lee M. Thomas, 1986
How Has Environmental Risk Communication Changed?
• No longer one-way messages from experts to non-experts . . .
but rather . . .
• -- an interactive process of exchange of information and opinion among individuals, groups, and institutions -
National Research Council, 1989
Current Problems• Public debate has become polarized
– Two camps: developers/industry vs. zero-growth proponents
• Each camp has its own support system -- both seek credibility
• Public confidence in big business and gov’t has declined– 55% to 19% between 1966 and 1980
Risk Communication now has its own body of research
• Mental Model Approach– focus on cognitive studies
• Procedural Approach– focus on risk perception and social movement studies
• Peter Sandman’s Work– practical applications for government and industry
My Research Approaches
• Collect data through surveys and focus group work
• Test risk messages in verbal, written, and graphical forms.
• Use case studies to gather best practices.
• Devise and test mechanisms for ensuring interactive communication (the feedback loop).
• Create communication plans that integrate communication into risk management.
Ed HolleyTransport and Fate of Pollutants in Water Bodies
• Analyticalstudies
• Laboratorystudies
• Fieldstudies
0
0 .0 5
0 .1
0 .1 5
0 .2
0 .2 5
0 .3
0 .3 5
0 .4
0 .4 5
1
3
5
7
9
1 1
1 3
1 5
1 7
1 9
2 1
2 3
2 5
2 7
2 9
3 1
3 3
3 5
3 7
3 9
S 1 S 2 S 3 S 4 S 5 S 6 S 7 S 8 S 9 S 1 0 S 1 1 S 1 2 S 1 3 S 1 4 S 1 5 S 1 6 S 1 7 S 1 8 S 1 9 S 2 0 S 2 1 S 2 2 S 2 3 S 2 4 S 2 5 S 2 6 S 2 7 S 2 8 S 2 9
Lynn KatzContaminant Fate and Transport• Research Areas
– Contaminant Fate and Transport
– Contaminant Remediation
– Multimedia Learning Tools
• Areas of Expertise
– Water Chemistry
– Surface Chemistry
• Funding Agencies
– National Science Foundation
– Department of Energy
– DuPont Engineering
Contaminant TransportContaminant Transport
Toxics, Inc
Trichloroethylene
Uranium
Arsenic LeadToxic Ions
Radionuclides
Do WeMeetWater Quality Standards?
Gasoline Benzene
Chlorinated Solvents
Toluene
Plutonium
Well
Contaminant Fate and TransportContaminant Fate and Transport
MacroscopicQuantify Removal
MicroscopicIdentify Reactions
Rock
H2O
Air & Water
Field ScalePredict Transport
Research StrategyResearch Strategy• Identify Reactions
that increase/decrease contaminant concentrations.• Quantify Removal
as a function of environmental conditions. • Incorporate these Reactions
into models that will enable us to predict transport.• Develop Treatment Processes
that employ these reactions to reduce contaminant levels.
Spyros KinnasOcean Engineering and Computational Hydrodynamics
• External and internal propulsor flows
• Propulsor/hull interaction
• Prediction of cavitation
• Design of optimum propeller blades
• Wave dynamics and wave/body interactions
• Viscous flows
Cavity Planforms on a Propeller Blade
Simulated
Observed
Flow Field Around a Propeller
Transient Flow Through a Propulsor
B-spline Representation of a Propeller
Interaction of waves and ocean bodies
Viscous Flow Inside a Channel
Biological Treatment of Vapor Phase Contaminants
Dr. Kerry A. Kinney
Civil Engineering Department
Why is Air Pollution Control Important?
• Approximately 46 million Americans currently live in areas that do not meet EPA’s ambient air quality standards: VOCs + NOx
Ozone SMOG
• Approximately 3.7 million tons of air toxics are emitted annually.
What does this mean in Texas?
UT Program in Air Resources Engineering
Source Characterization
Ambient Air Monitoring
Air Pollution Control
Vapor Phase Bioreactors
• Use microorganisms to remove pollutants from air.
• Advantages– high efficiency
– minimal byproduct generation
– less energy intensive
– lower operating costs
Biologically Active Packed
Bed
Current Research
• Develop Environmentally Friendly Air Pollution Control Systems
• Specific Applications– Treat waste gas streams from paint spray booth operations
or from hazardous waste site remediation activities.
• Explore New Types of Bioreactors– Fungal Based Bioreactors !
Fungal Vapor-Phase Bioreactor
Fungus: Doing Your Dirty Work For You!
Desmond F. LawlerPhysical/Chemical Treatment Processes
for Water and Wastewater
• Removal of Particles
– Flocculation
– Sedimentation
– Filtration
– Membrane Processes--Ultrafiltration
• Removal of Soluble Contaminants
– Precipitation of Metals
– Stripping of Dissolved Gases
– Adsorption of Natural Organic Matter
Current and Recent Applications
• Removal of disinfection by-products from drinking water
• Hydrodynamic effects on particle collisions in flocculation
• Particle and fluid dynamics in continuous flow sedimentation
• Softening and ultrafiltration: a drinking water treatment strategy
• Recycling water in semiconductor manufacturing
• Dynamics of deep bed filtration
• Lead removal from soil
• Chromium removal from groundwater
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1Fraction Removed
Area = Fraction
Remaining
Area = Fraction Removed Profile
in batch or in pfr
Particle Trajectories inFlocculation/Sedimentation
CriticalOpen
aiaj
Xc
Analysis of Continuous Flow Sedimentation
Drinking Water Treatment: From Particle Size to Plant Performance
Howard LiljestrandEnvironmental Chemistry
• Air Chemistry– Coupling air chemistry with vertical turbulent
transport– Predicting rates of reaction from molecular
structure– Collection and treatment of Volatile Organic
Compounds– Prediction of air quality from accidental releases
Ray LoehrSite Remediation
• Environmentally acceptable endpoints
• Kinetics of chemical release from soil and sediment
• Technologies for site remediation
• Data for risk-based site decisions
Remediation Approaches
• Obtaining sound knowledge for sound decisions
• Based on Assessment of site-specific risks
• Performance based evaluations
Daene McKinneyWater Resources Planning and Management
Precipitation
Surfacewater Groundwater
David Maidment:GIS in Water Resources
• Better flood risk assessment
• Better drought planning
• Better water quality planning
CRWR-FloodMap
ArcViewDigital
ElevationModel
HEC-HMSFlood
discharge
HEC-RASWatersurfaceprofiles
ArcViewFlood
plain maps
CRWR-PrePro AvRAS
Digital map database
3D Flood Modeling
Surface Water Rights in Texas
Rio Grande
Colorado
Brazos SulphurTrinity
Nueces
8000 water rightlocations
23 main river basins
City of Austin
Water Rights in the Sulphur BasinWater right locationStream gage location
Drainage areas delineated fromDigital Elevation Models are used to estimate flow at water right locations based on flow at stream gage locations
Water Quality Planning in the Trinity Basin
• Discharge points• Water right locations• Water quality segment
points• USGS flow gage
locations• Surface water quality
monitoring stations
Points Connected by a River Network
Global Outreach“The United States is pre-eminent among nations in the development of industrial and scientific techniques.The material resources which we can afford to usefor the assistance of other peoples are limited. But ourimponderable resources in technical knowledge are constantly growing and are inexhaustible. I believethat we should make available to peace-loving peoplethe benefits of our store of technical knowledge in orderto help them realize their aspirations for a better life…”
President Harry S. Truman Inaugural Speech, January 1949
Joe MalinaMunicipal and industrial wastewater treatment
• Environmental impacts and controls from highway construction
• Sludge handling, treatment, disposal and management
• Inactivation and fate of indicator organisms in wastewater sludge
• Solid waste engineering and management
Runoff Quality from Highways
Gerald E. Speitel, JrTreatment Processes for
Hazardous Organic Chemicals
• Biodegradation
• Adsorption
• Oxidation
• Drinking water treatment
• Treatment process design
• Treatment process computer simulation
Treatment Process Engineering
• Improve understanding of basic mechanisms affecting process performance
• Develop new technologies
• More cost-effective approaches to design and operate treatment processes
• Reduce raw materials consumption and waste production
Schematic of an Experimental Reactor
Lumen Influent
Sample Port
Experimental Laboratory Reactor
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550
Time (hours)
Mas
s F
low
Rat
es (
µg
/min
)
Biotic Lumen Influent
Biotic Lumen Effluent
Biotic PFR Effluent
Abiotic Lumen Influent
Abiotic Lumen Effluent
Abiotic PFR Effluent
Results from the Reactor
Lumen Residence
Time1.5 min
Shell Residence Time Constant at 10 min
Lumen Residence
Time2.5 min
Lumen Residence
Time3.7 min
EWRE Institute Vision
• What does Texas need in the future?
• What are we doing about supplying that now?
• How can we define our mission in such a manner as to enlist the support of donors, program sponsors, and the University administration
Texas Population and Water Resources
0
5
10
15
20
0
10
20
30
40
1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
36 million
14 million
17 million
Population (Millions)
Year
Water Resources(Millions Acre-ft)
Year20501990
Surface WaterGroundwater
• By 2050, twice the population to support on less water than now• Increasing dependence on more polluted surface water • Droughts reduce water resources by half or more
B
C
D
A
AIR LAB
SITE REMEDIATION
WASTE WATER TREATMENT
WATER TREATMENT
WASTE MINIMIZATION
ORGANIC & INORG. LABS
NEW INITIATIVES
COMPUTER LAB
ADMINISTRATION
STUDENT OFFICES
FACULTY OFFICES
SEMINAR/CONFERENCE
LA
BO
RA
TO
RY
FA
CIL
ITIE
SS
UP
PO
RT
SUPPORT LABSA = Microbiological preparation labB = Clean roomsC = Temperature & humidity control roomsD = Cold Storage
Current EWRE Program Data
• 15 faculty
• 100 graduate students
• 10 professional research staff
• 25 graduate courses offered per year
• 200 graduate degrees granted over the past five years
• Average research funding of $6.9 million/yr
Future Areas of Excellence
• Treatment process engineering
• Water resources engineering
• Air resources engineering
• Environmental remediation
• Water quality
• Risk analysis and assessment
• Environmental management and policy
Future Directions
• Water reuse planning, management, and treatment
• Drought planning and management
• Indoor air quality
• Pollution prevention and industrial ecology
• Environmental toxicology
• Environmental molecular sciences
• Solid waste management
Future Concerns in Texas
• Environmental sustainability
• Rapid population growth
• Diminishing supply of drinking water
• Air pollution in urban areas
• Hazardous chemicals
Fund Raising Goals
• New Environmental and Water Resources Engineering Research Facility
– Building ($12,000,000)
– Equipment ($3,000,000)
• Endowments
– Technical staff ($3,000,000)
– Equipment upgrades ($1,500,000)
– Distinguished Visiting Scholar ($2,000,000)
• Total Funds Needed = $21,500,000
Impact of a New Facility
• A focal point for research and educational excellence
• An environment for integrated, interdisciplinary projects
• State of the art laboratories
• Consolidation of all EWRE activities in one facility
Impact of a New Facility
• Continue momentum for growth of the EWRE program
• A base of support for leveraging external funds
• A unique opportunity to better serve Texas